Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of
Table 1 Summary of previous experiments on cylinders with a free-end mounted on a ground plane
Author(s) Year h/d Re10
4
Measurements
P F HW 7PP LDA PIV OFV SFV
Okamoto and
Yagita (1973)
1973 1 12.5 1.3
4 4
Farivar (1981) 1981 2.78 15 7.0
4 4
Sarode et al. (1981) 1981 1.1 10 2.2
4 4
Taniguchi et al. (1981b) 1981 0.75 5 2.1
4 4 4
Taniguchi et al. (1981a) 1981 1 5.0
4
Okamoto (1982) 1982 1 4.7
4 4 4
Sakamoto and Arie (1983) 1983 1 8 0.027 0.092
4 4
Kawamura et al. (1984) 1984 1 8 3.2
4 4 4
Sin and So (1987) 1987 0.5 2.5 4.8
4 4
Uematsu et al. (1990) 1990 1 4 3.2 15.1
4 4 4
Baban and So (1991a, b) 1991 1 2 4.6
4 4
Okamoto and
Sunabashiri (1992)
1992 0.5 24 2.5 4.7
4 4 4 4
Luo et al. (1996) 1996 4 8 3.3
4
Kappler (2002) 2000 2 5 2.2 5.4
4 4
Park and Lee (2000, 2002) 2000 6 13 2.0
4 4 4
Leder (2003) 2003 2 20.0
4
Roh and Park (2003) 2003 1.25, 4.25 0.6,14.8
4 4
Sumner et al. (2004) 2004 3, 5, 9 6.0
4 4 4
Present work 2004 1 20.0
4 4 4
Key to measurement types: P surface pressures, F force measurements, HW hot-wire anemometry, 7PP seven-hole pressure probe, LDA
laser Doppler anemometry, PIV particle image velocimetry, OFV oil ow visualisation, SFV smoke ow visualisation
11
20 m/s. The cylinder model had an aspect ratio h/d=1,
with height and diameter of 150 mm (Fig. 1). These
dimensions give a Reynolds number based on diameter
of 1.9610
5
, which is just below the critical value for
transition in the boundary layer on a circular cylinder
(Zdravkovich 1997). The x, y and z axes are in the
streamwise, transverse and spanwise directions, respec-
tively, while the respective velocity components are de-
noted as u, v and w.
The model was mounted on a ground plate, which
had an elliptic leading edge 0.6 m upstream of the axis of
the cylinder. The boundary layer on the ground plate
was allowed to develop naturally. Its prole was mea-
sured using a hot-wire without the model being present
at x/d=0.5. This indicated a turbulent boundary layer
with a displacement thickness of 0.1d at 20 m/s. Table 2
shows further details of the boundary layer. The
boundary layer is dened by its thickness d, the dis-
placement thickness d
*
, the momentum thickness h, the
Reynolds number based on momentum thickness, Re
h
and the shape factor g=d
*
/h. The ow at the leading
edge of the ground plate was uniform across the span of
the tunnel to within 0.5%, while the turbulence intensity
was 0.3%.
It is necessary to consider the eects of the walls of
the tunnel on the ow around the body. This is assessed
by means of a blockage coecient or, in the case of a
three-dimensional body, three ratios. These are the lat-
eral blockage ratio B
l
=d/W
T
, the vertical blockage ratio
B
v
=d/H
T
and the total blockage ratio B
t
=B
l
B
v
, where
W
T
and H
T
are the width and height of the wind tunnel
working section above the ground plate, respectively.
In this case, the ratios are B
l
=0.167, B
v
=0.275
and B
t
=0.042. For a blu body, there is no simple
relationship describing the eect of blockage, but studies
have been carried out by West and Apelt (1982) on
cylinders spanning the tunnel, and by Farell et al. (1977)
on cooling tower models. According to the work of
Farell et al. (1977), the base pressure coecient (C
Pb
) in
these measurements can be expected to be 35% higher
than in unconned ow. The change in the pressure
gradient induced by a tunnel blockage can also have an
eect on the ow topology due to changes in the sepa-
ration and transition points.
3.2 Surface ow visualisation
Oil ow visualisation gives insight into the topology of
the ow. It shows the lines of separation and attach-
ment, as well as the bases of vortices on the surface. To
achieve this, all the surfaces of the ground plate and
model were covered with black self-adhesive PVC. A
mixture of titanium dioxide, paran and oleic acid was
then applied to all the relevant surfaces. The tunnel was
run for about 30 min so that the mixture dried com-
pletely. The ow pattern was then photographed using a
standard 35 mm camera, with the model in place in the
tunnel.
3.3 Particle image velocimetry
The PIV measurements were carried out using a Dantec
FlowMap system. A 120-mJ Nd:Yag dual-cavity laser
was mounted on the roof of the wind tunnel, above a
slot, to form a 1-mm-thick light sheet. This allowed
measurement in either the longitudinal, xz, plane or the
transverse, yz, plane. In the longitudinal planes, u and
w velocities were measured, while in the transverse
planes, v and w were measured. The 80C60 HiSense
CCD camera was mounted either at the side of the
tunnel, viewing through a glass window, for the longi-
tudinal planes, or inside the tunnel, viewing upstream,
for the transverse planes. Details of the image locations
and elds of view are given in Table 3. The seeding was
provided by a water-based fog generator, placed outside
the tunnel so that the fog would diuse before entering
the tunnel. This avoided large concentrations of particles
entering the image plane.
The cross-correlation method is used to calculate the
velocities from the images. The images are divided into
interrogation areas of 3232 pixels, with an overlap of
50%. The physical size of these areas are given in
Table 2 Details of the boundary layer on the ground plane at the
position of the leading edge of the model (x/d=0.5, y/d=0)
U
(m/s) d/d d
*
/d h/d Re
h
g
10 0.20 0.022 0.018 1,761 1.21
15 0.14 0.016 0.013 1,942 1.25
20 0.10 0.013 0.010 2,037 1.30
55mm
600mm
2400mm
1200mm
545mm 150mm
150mm
Cylinder model
Ground plate
(b) Side view of model in working section
Contraction
Working section
0.9m
0.6m
2.4m
Diffuser
4.0m
6.4m
(a) Arrangement of wind tunnel
x=0
U
Fig. 1 Diagram of wind tunnel and model arrangement (not to
scale)
12
Table 3, denoted as D
PIV
. In the longitudinal planes, the
dominant velocity is parallel to the plane and of the
same order of magnitude as the free-stream velocity. At
20 m/s, the time for a particle to cross the interrogation
area of the coarse-grid longitudinal planes is 365 ls.
This means that the time between consecutive frames
should be less than 90 ls, according to experience, which
suggests that the time should be less than 25% of the
time to cross the interrogation area. In practice, a time
of 60 ls was found to give the most reliable measure-
ments.
In the transverse planes, the dominant ow is nor-
mal to the plane, with the in-plane components being
relatively small compared to the free-stream velocity.
This can cause poor correlation if the particles are
crossing the light sheet too quickly, so the time between
images generally needs to be small when the ow is
normal to the plane. With a light sheet thickness of
1 mm, the particles would take 50 ls to cross the light
sheet, although in reality, the thickness of the light
sheet and its intensity distribution are not known ex-
actly. Also, the ow in the turbulent recirculation re-
gion varies greatly across the plane, so it is dicult to
determine what the time between frames should be. In
practice, a time of 15 ls was found to give the maxi-
mum number of valid correlations. The erroneous
vectors caused by poor correlation were removed using
a range validation, with the upper limit typically set to
25 m/s for the longitudinal planes. The discarded vec-
tors were replaced with interpolated values from the
surrounding points.
The accuracy of the velocity measurements is esti-
mated by assuming an accuracy in the correlation of
0.1-pixel displacement (Rael et al. 1998). This corre-
sponds to a velocity accuracy of between 0.5% for the
closeup views and 6% for the transverse planes. There
is an additional statistical error due to the nite number
of samples. By looking at the mean after a certain
number of samples, it was found that, after 500 sam-
ples, the mean had converged to within 1% of the value
after 1,000 samples. In the longitudinal planes, the
deviations from the mean ow were smaller than in the
transverse planes, so only 500 samples were needed in
these planes.
3.4 Surface pressure measurements
The pressure on the surface of the model was measured
using a set of ve pressure transducers set in the sides
of the cylinder. The sensors used were piezoresistive
gauge pressure transducers (Endevco Model 8507C-2)
with a 2-mm-diameter silicon diaphragm and a range
of 13,790 N/m
2
. The ve transducers were equally
spaced along a generator of the cylinder (z/d=0.17 to
0.83 inclusive) and the cylinder was rotated on the
dynamometer base through 360 at 5 intervals, so that
a full picture of the surface pressures could be gath-
ered.
It was found to be necessary to calibrate the
transducers in the model, even when xed using a
exible adhesive to minimise the radial loading on the
barrel of the transducer. This was achieved by mea-
suring the surface pressures at two angles using pres-
sure tappings in the transducer holes which were
connected to a Furness FC012 digital micromanometer
with a known calibration. The frequency response is
at up to 20% of the resonant frequency, 70,000 Hz,
which covers the range of interest. The total uncer-
tainty to a 95% condence level in the pressure mea-
surements is 1.4%.
4 Results and discussion
4.1 Overview
The ow considered here is complex, with a number of
constituent features, as shown in the schematic diagram
in Fig. 2. The dominant features of the time-averaged
ow are the horseshoe vortex, which is formed on the
ground when the upstream ow separates due to the
Table 3 Details of PIV measurement planes
Plane x/d y/d z/d D
PIV
(mm) Samples U
(m/s)
L1 1.45 0.50 0 0 1.55 7.3 1,000 20
L2 0.71 1.24 0 0 1.55 7.3 1,000 20
L3 0.66 2.60 0 0 1.55 7.3 1,000 20
L4 0.46 1.01 0 0 0.44 2.1 500 10,20
L5 0.60 0.57 0 0.62 1.56 4.4 500 10,20
L6 1.28 0.34 0 0 0.75 3.5 500 10,15,20
L7 1.03 0.48 0 0 0.44 2.1 500 10,15,20
T0 0.50 0.75 0.75 0 1.20 5.6 1,000 20
T1 0.67 0.75 0.75 0 1.20 5.6 1,000 20
T2 0.83 0.75 0.75 0 1.20 5.6 1,000 20
T3 1.00 0.75 0.75 0 1.20 5.6 1,000 20
T4 1.50 0.75 0.75 0 1.20 5.6 1,000 20
T5 2.50 0.75 0.75 0 1.20 5.6 1,000 20
13
adverse pressure gradient; the vortex system on the free-
end, inside the separated ow; the arch vortex in the rear
recirculation region; and the trailing vortices down-
stream of the reattachment.
4.2 Pressures on the cylinder
Figure 3 shows the mean surface pressure coecient C
P
,
around the circumference of the cylinder at dierent
heights above the oor, at U
, of 0.09.
4.3 Horseshoe vortex
The signature of the horseshoe vortex on the ground can
be seen in the ow visualisation picture in Fig. 5. The
ow features in the oil ow visualisation are interpreted
according to Tobak and Peake (1982) and Perry and
Chong (2000). The primary separation point (S
1
) is at
0 50 100 150
5
0
0.5
1
(degrees)
C
P
z/d=0.83
z/d=0.67
z/d=0.50
z/d=0.33
z/d=0.17
0 50 100 150
5
0
0.5
1
(degrees)
C
P
Current work
Okamoto (1992)
Kawamura (1984)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3a, b Pressure distributions around the cylinder. a Distribu-
tion of pressure coecient around cylinder at dierent heights, at
U
E
(
f
)
Fig. 4 Power spectral density function of pressure measurements at
z/h=0.5, u=180, U
=20 m/s
Separation
Horseshoe vortex
Arch vortex
z
x
y
d
U
Tip vortex
Trailing vortex
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of the time-averaged ow over a
truncated cylinder (not to scale)
14
x/d=1. Line C is the line of converging streamlines at
the upstream edge of the primary vortex. This line has a
thickness of about 0.04d, which is likely to be the width
of the vortex 1 in Fig. 6. This means that the separation
point S
2
is at the downstream edge of this line, while the
attachment point A
1
is at the upstream edge. The
streamlines on the inside of this line are created by the
outward ow under the primary vortex and are swept
back by the spiral motion of the vortex. There is another
line of diverging streamlines (D) inside this line,
extending from the leading edge of the cylinder. This is
the inner edge of the horseshoe, which moves away from
the cylinder as it moves downstream. The inward facing
streamlines inside this line are due to a small vortex
which is formed in the corner, and rotates in the oppo-
site sense to the primary vortex. Figure 5 shows a view
of the front of the cylinder, illustrating the upwash near
the free-end and the downwash near the ground.
Figure 7 shows the time-averaged streamlines on the
symmetry plane in front of the cylinder, which indicate a
dominant vortex. Its centre is at x/d=0.67, z/d=0.04.
Extrapolation of a dividing streamline to the ground
suggests that there is a separation point on the ground
plane in front of the horseshoe vortex at x/d=0.76
when U
=0.1
(a)
(b)
Fig. 7 a Time-averaged streamlines on centreline (y/d=0) up-
stream of cylinder, showing the horseshoe vortex. b An exploded
view of the area marked by the dashed rectangle in (a), showing the
attachment point with time-averaged vectors of velocity
(U
=20 m/s)
9 8 7 6 5
1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
x/d
U
/
U
=10 m/s
U
=20 m/s
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
4
2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
z/d
U
/
U
=10 m/s
U
=20 m/s
(a)
(b)
Fig. 8a, b Normalised time-averaged streamwise velocity through
the centre of horseshoe vortex. a z/d=0.04. b x/d=0.66
16
mean ow shows a vortex structure on the centreline,
formed by the reversed ow along the tip. The location
of the reattachment point, R
T
, at x/d=0.17 can be seen.
There is an uncertainty of 0.01d in this measurement,
due to the resolution of the PIV. Looking at the
instantaneous vorticity plots in Fig. 10, the shear layer
over the top of the cylinder is visible. This remains fairly
steady for the rst 0.2d, but quickly becomes fully tur-
bulent, forming the coherent structures visible down-
stream of x/d=0.3. Figure 11 shows the ow
immediately behind the trailing edge of the cylinder. The
tip vortices formed by the ow up over the edge of the
free-end are visible at the corners of the free-end.
One recent paper on the subject of the free-end owby
Roh and Park (2003) proposed a ow topology consist-
ing of two pairs of counter-rotating streamwise vortices,
with the inner pair being rooted on the swirl patterns on
the tip. These measurements were carried out at Rey-
nolds numbers of 5.9210
3
and 1.4810
5
, with aspect
ratios of 1.25 and 4.25; the high Re, low aspect ratio case
should correspond quite closely to the present study.
Their light-sheet visualisation appears to show these
vortices inside the two tip vortices and trailing down-
stream of the cylinder. However, there is no evidence of
this inner pair of vortices in the current results. While the
ow topology on the surface of the free-end agrees well
with the present ndings, the ow topology on the
symmetry plane does not. The PIV measurements of the
owon the symmetry plane show that the owreattaches
at the saddle point R
T
, whereas Roh and Park show a
separation here with no reattachment on the free-end.
The PIV on the symmetry plane shows a vortex core in
the recirculation region, which must be attached to a
surface. The most likely explanation is that this vortex is
attached to the free-end at the two swirl patterns seen in
the oil ow visualisation. This would agree with the
hypothesis of Kawamura et al. (1984), that a mushroom
vortex exists here. If the smoke visualisation of Roh and
Park is showing this vortex, the core would have to cross
5 0 0.5
1
1.2
x/d
z
/
d
U/U
=1
5 0 0.5
1
1.2
x/d
z
/
d
0.5 0 0.5
1
1.2
x/d
z
/
d
(a)
(b)
Fig. 10a, b The ow in the symmetry plane (y/d=0) on top of the
cylinder showing time-averaged velocity vectors and two instanta-
neous vorticity plots (U
=1
Fig. 12 Streamwise evolution
of the ow in the yz plane,
showing time-averaged velocity
vectors viewed from
downstream, U
=20 m/s
6 4 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
0.8
1
1.2
y/d
z
/
d
V/U
=1
Fig. 11 Time-averaged velocity vectors at x/d=0.5 (U
=20 m/s)
18
from the leading edge. This is further forward than the
100 angle that would be expected for an innite cylinder
in the turbulent boundary layer regime. The later sepa-
ration point appeared to make little dierence to the
topology of the ow, and so, other measurements were
not repeated in this condition.
Downstream of separation, the detached shear layer
around the cylinder encloses a recirculation region. This
extends to x/d=1.6, where the ow descending from the
free-end attaches to the ground plane, marked by R
F
in
Fig. 5. For comparison, Okamoto and Sunabashiri
(1992) found a value of x/d=2.9 for this reattachment
position, discovered by searching for the line of zero
dynamic pressure using a Pitot tube. The more recent
work of Leder (2003) gives x/d=2.2 for an aspect ratio
of 2, using LDA, and Sumner et al. (2004) give x/d=3
for an aspect ratio of 3, found using a seven-hole
pressure probe. Okamoto and Sunabashiri did nd that
the recirculation length reduced with aspect ratio, so it
seems that the present work is in line with Leder and
Sumner et al., but not with Okamoto and Sunabashiri.
This may be due to the dierent measurement technique
of Okamoto and Sunabashiri.
Between the reattachment point and the cylinder,
there is a region of backow along the ground, which
wraps into the arch vortex. The bases of this vortex can
be seen in the ow visualisation in Fig. 5, marked as F
F
.
The shear layers at the sides and over the top interact
and form a pair of tip vortices aligned in the streamwise
direction. The development of these vortices can be seen
in the PIV measurement planes in Figs. 12 and 13.
At the rst plane (x/d=0.5), two counter-rotating tip
vortices can be seen at the free-end of the cylinder. They
are most clearly shown by the area of high vorticity, ra-
ther than the velocity vectors, as these are inuenced by
the global ow around the back of the cylinder. These
vortices remain at a similar location in the plane until x/
d=1.0, where they start to dilate and descend towards
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x/d=0.50
z
/
d
x/d=0.67
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x/d=0.83
z
/
d
x/d=1.0
5 0 0.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x/d=1.5
z
/
d
y/d
0.5 0 0.5
x/d=2.5
y/d
0 2
Fig. 13 Streamwise evolution
of the ow in the yz plane,
showing time-averaged
contours of vorticity magnitude
viewed from downstream,
U