DMITRI MARTILA

eestidima@gmail.com
Estonian Physical Society
Laane 9-51, Tartu 50605, Estonia
Return to Innocence
or Vaccine against atheism.
Have You seen lm NeverEnding Story? There is enemy - noth-
ingness. The atheism is nothing, because in its core is absence of Holy
Trinity, thus - nothingness. If weighed on a balance, they are noth-
ing; together they are only a breath (Psalm 62:9). You are like Don
Quixote, are ghting the nothing, arguing with it? The Angels are
crying out loud! You can not win, because there is nothing to ght.
Your only option is to write Repent now! and that is all You can.
Nothing is atheist and, thus, atheist can not hear You. If the man is
not atheist, then he can repent the sins. Therefore the title of the book
is not Cure of Atheism, but only Vaccine. The beloved Richard
Dawkins is not atheist, he is 50% theist (cf the nal battle in video
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed). Atheist can not repent, Atheist
is nothing (cf Psalm 62:9), nothing does not exist (see below), thus,
there are no atheists. They all are theists, our missing brothers and
beloved sisters. The arguments of reason can not reach semi-theists,
because mind is severe damaged. The cure is giving them the exact
Bible quotes. Let God speak, you are not wiser, than He: Heaven and
earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. (Matthew
24:35).
Contents
1. Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
. 1.1 The beauty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. Jesus I know, and Paul I know about, but who are you? Acts 19. . . . . . . . . . . 5
List of rejections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3. Battle with satan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4. Truth exists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5. Life is like fairy-tale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6. Our free will and Gods omniscience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
7. Dangers of doing science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
. 7.1 Correcting methodological naturalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1
8. My proofs of God. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
. 8.1 Vacuum mystery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
9. Universe of the Bible. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
. 9.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
. 9.2 On Calculus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
. 9.3 On Virtual Big Bang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
. 9.4 Neverwas history. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
. 9.5 Supporting the Biblical Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
. 9.6 Speeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
. 9.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
. 9.8 Using the Biblical model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
. 9.8.1 Virtual Big Bang. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
. 9.9 Where are Heavens?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
10. An alternative to 5-sigma selection rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
11. Proton is like God? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
12. Observer is needed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
13. Life of numbers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
14. We all have the power (song Life is Life) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
15. All knowledge is faith. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
16. One can be proving God. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
17. The Orthodox Faith is the true religion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
18. Me on Black Holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
19. Evolution into nonsense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
20. Holy Icons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
21. Problem of two parallels intersection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
22. On logic and omniscience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
23. Law of conservation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
24. Talking to people . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
25. And more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
The Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
2
1 Preface
Morning. Sun is under horizon, is leaving the America. In that hour I decided to
write a book. Bestseller book. I have experience as writer: the LAP Academic
publisher ordered mine book. The sense of beauty. Mine goal is to submit to
the reader the sense of beauty within poor words of this paper. What do we
want: beauty, truth, feeling to be at home, justice. The world. It must has the
author, because the book has the author.
There is good and there is evil. I was told on a date with beautiful lady:
You must choose.
What to choose? - I wondered - am I loving You or not?
Not that, but You must choose. - was the strange answer.
The good or evil. One can not be partly good and partly evil; like a picture
in Google, where angel lustfully hugs the demon. The good rejects evil like acid
the rusty metal. There is always one choice. Evil or Good. Atheists chose Evil.
satan is the Commander of evil forces.
What is evil? The evil is the persecution of God. Who is God? He is good.
The making compromises with own conscience, is THE TICKET TO HELL.
The mistakes we make, are subject of confession, matter of regrets. In such way
we show God, that we hate the evil.
After the shame named The God Delusion the book glorifying God is best
welcome. It must become the bestseller as our redemption after the feast of
fools called God Delusion. It will be our Return to Innocence the title of
present bestseller. It is bestseller in the future, otherwise we have no future after
releasing totally hellish well-selling book God Delusion. Full of hatered. It is
simply ill, it is illogical: in one part Richard Dawkins argues, that no-one is re-
sponsible for anything. Another part tells, that the believers are responsible for
everything. Also Dawkins argues, that atheists made no harm whatsoever. But
history proves, that atheistic Soviet Union has killed many innocent Christians,
especially the Orthodox priests.
At least Richard is believer, that matter exists. Be strong, Richard, ght for
3
that! The tendency is to refute the matter also. Orthodox Christians dogma, is
what material world exists. We share that with dear Richard. Go, Richard, go!
Dear Lord Jesus, please show mercy on Richards soul! Dear Guardian Angel,
please pray for Richard Dawkins! Richard, your admiration of Nature and
Science comes from grace of Holy Trinity. Otherwise two rustproof electrodes
in pleasure center of the brain for certain give you unimaginable pleasure: just
push the button. Be grateful to Holy Trinity, do not bite the hand, which is
feeding you. Hereby the fjh1616 user asked plenty of questions, among: If god
is real, why am I an atheist? Me: Luke 11:52-54, it is your criminal use of Free
Will the gift from Holy Trinity. Do not bite!
To atheist B.B.: it is Your faith, that all people are mindless, as written
in a mindless sick book. But it is satanic lie. Thus, all good people have mind.
Why it is true? The Verity by denition is Jesus Christ, the Son of Father God.
Jesus is saying, that mind exists. Thus, it is true, that good people are with
mind. The boy in video I Declare War on Atheists is good. Thus, he has the
mind and Free Will.
Here midst physics and spiritual is neutral area X. I wrote a book about
this area (there is a movie Stalker about the area). And Bruce Anomaly (be-
low) in that area. My proof of God is not a rejection of faith or its destruction,
because all knowledge is faith. That you understand in the course of reading.
There is your quest for knowledge. Almost all theists say: we have evidences.
However I have derived the solid proofs in glory of God. But be not tempted
by the cold rationality down, brother. There must be enough room for faith. It
is our beauty - the faith; we, Orthodox Christians, are the keepers of true faith.
As a great scholar M.Lomonosov said, the God gave us many great books:
Holy Scriptures (Bible and writings of Holy Fathers) and Nature. St. Basil
the Great once said, that the Lord has given us two wonderful books, these
are Scripture and the book of the Universe, the very World in which we live
(azbyka.ru). You can read the Bible still and always the ultimate bestseller.
For many holy martyrs the Holy Scriptures were sucient for salvation. And
for me and for you are sucient. But if you nd a piece of your time, precious
to eternity, I perch you in what I read in the book of Nature. I read with an
4
eye to the Bible. The Lord has written another book besides the Bible, and
did everything right. The book of Nature is vital, it is our task in our human
nature. Yes nature is beautiful, very good (Genesis 1:31). Human is the
bunch midst the material and the spiritual. So our home is in the Stalker
area X. Maximus the Confessor has uttered: man is created to bring all creation
to God (predanie.ru).
While reading the Bible without the help of the Holy Spirit and consultations
with Holy Fathers, the person makes false conclusions. Analogously, while
studying Nature the person makes mistakes in the methods and interpretations.
Especially if he started with the book of Nature, but never seriously read the
Bible. You know that Nature in Greek language sounds like Physics. And
in the Greek text of the Bible it is found thirteen times!! (rusbible.ru). The
second book Nature is kindly advertised in many places of the First Book;
for example, the rst chapter of Genesis and the chapter 43 of the Sirach.
Without even mentioning the word Physics. Observations from high tower of
magnicent starry sky led heart of St. Barbara http://youtu.be/3KzzpvJICJc
into the unimaginable delight: she saw between the lines of the Nature Book
the Spirit of the author.
1.1 The beauty
There is no Gravity force in General Relativity, so a body on the ground do
have non-zero acceleration result of acting of the ground on free motion of the
body. Just like the cosmonaut in starting rocket does not move, however has
the acceleration (even in perception of the Guardian Angel in the cabin). But
the Newtonian force of Gravity in the [15] exactly equals the case of General
Relativity. This is divine miracle, which is embedded in the beautiful creation,
And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.
Genesis 1:31.
A space-station. Rocket A starts with acceleration g gets velocity v, then
ies for L, then slowing down with acceleration g, turns back and accelerates to
v and ies back to station, having the g in the end. You had Special Relativity.
Now clock from station gets to Earth (radius R) and gets back. All takes the
5
same time as the rocket A travel. You had General Relativity. The time dilation
in Special Relativity is dierent from that in General Relativity. Moreover, the
Lorentz contraction of the rocket is dierent from a kind of contraction at
the Earth. Moreover, the case L 0 is physically totally dierent from L = 0
one. However dilations are dierent. All that changes if velocity is cosmic, s.c.
escape velocity (v
2
= 2 g R the character at the R). That is clear sign. The
cosmic velocity, our quest for Heavens is embedded in the nature.
Karl Schwarzschild gave the solution of the Black Hole called Schwarzschild
metric. In my article of reviewed journal JCRSCI horizon is an insuperable
barrier for earthly life. As a shield the edge of the Universe is shielded from our
y. That word Schwarz-schild in German means black shield. Next in the
Schwarzschild solution (the most famous and historically leading) the Coulomb
force has the same form with a Newtonian force one in slightly curved region
of space. Though Id like to follow their calculations. Two coincidences. And
coincidences in Gods world it is Beauty (see Genesis 1)
1) Fibonacci numbers with the golden ratio are written in nature (cf. video:
Intelligent Design: Waking Up To Creation). 2) She: study the cytology...
The Large-scale structure of the universe, is like a single cell cytoskeleton.
2 Jesus I know, and Paul I know about, but who are you? Acts 19
My large and impressive CV You nd in my rst (Spiritual and physical) book
[10]. I received an excellent education, which was crowned with a gold medal
and red diploma (cum laude). But I was like everyone else. Not wise. I
wrote as like under dictation the articles for Phys.Rev.E and EPJB. Then I have
discovered another source, from which I drink and eat now. You know, What is
the source. This true education was crowned with article (Dmitri S Martila, On
Naked Singularities of Spacetime Curvature, JCRSCI, 2012) in peer reviewed,
ocial journal. There I thanked my mystical Supervisor, calling Him the
embodiment of Truth.
University of Tartu, Laboratory of Field Physics: since March 2004 was
researcher and lector, dismissed some time after confessing the Orthodox faith in
6
Jesus Christ. Diplomas for hard work for the benet of the Church, Estonian
Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate (2008, 2010). Acknowledgement for
contributing to the campaign, Family and Tradition Protection Center (2013).
You may read my papers in Physical Review, preprints archive viXra and
other places.
So I have got goldmedal. Materialist would say: it is not goldmedal, it
is only gilded. But he is not right before God! See me with gold in video:
http://u.to/D3lkBQ. Perhaps I am not worthy, and I am unhealable schizophrenic.
But even such a man can be inside Gods Plan: And he stripped o his clothes
also, and prophesied before Samuel in like manner, and lay down naked all that
day and all that night. Wherefore they say, Is Saul also among the prophets?
(1 Samuel 19:24 KJV).
Inside my head and heart are connected physics, mathematics, and faith in
the Lord Jesus Christ. Here is a photo, where Im between two racks: the right
of me Orthodox books, Cross, Holy icons, and the lamp icon. Left abstracts
and books about physics. Im not ashamed or embarrassed on any of this. Here
is a hybrid, a crazy mutant of XXI century. But I hope that with Gods
help, bearing fruits.
7
M.K.: Dima, but do not you think, sir, that you are somewhat confused
gates of the temples? Me: Read Acts 7:49. In this I take example from Him:
I am Orthodox Christian in physics and in Orthodox faith I am a physicist.
A.S.: Religion with physics? No! After all, there are many religions... Me:
So, purely logically, one of it is true. Two religions can not be true, because
Heaven is not cracked! In the Sky is no split of Truth Stone, latter is Jesus
Christ. Rebellious angels were dropped from Heaven to Earth. Read Galatians
1:8 and Revelation 12:7-13. The true religion must be placed under Physics.
And with true Religion we must raise the Physics up the hill, to the heights.
Without Him, the Physics has slipped to primitivism: the satanic materialism,
which is mild word for complete craziness.
In one man there are religion and science. So there must be not dialogue
(sick self-talk), but symbiosis. Symbiosis: one helps the other. As the left hand
and right hand, as the heart and brain. This symbiosis is called chastity.
I am not alone. 1) The priest Pavel Florensky is s.c. Russian Leonardo. In
his 17 years, Pavel Florensky has experienced a deep spiritual crisis, when sud-
8
denly clearly saw the limitations of physical knowledge and realized that without
faith in God it is impossible to know the Truth. In 1904 Florensky brilliantly
graduated Physics and Mathematics Faculty of Moscow University. Religious
and philosophical problematics in the subsequent the Fr. Florensky has widely
combined with research in various elds of knowledge linguistics, theory of
spatial arts, mathematics, physics http://drevo-info.ru/articles/2524.html. 2)
The Planck has... articles and lectures on the relationship of religion and sci-
ence. 3) I believe, that Einstein had progressed in faith:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwEw6UTIE68. 4) Fr. Timothy wrote the
book The Orthodox world and modern science. Lessons of creation science in
high school. (Moscow: Palmer) 1998. 5) He: The fruitfulness of combin-
ing scientic worldview with religious, i.e., derivation of scientic discoveries
from the dogmas of religion: the ancient Babylon was discovered thanks to
Bible http://www.riverow.ru/2012-4-Babilon.php; symbiosis between science
and religion in the past, the stars surveillance, the Pope Gregory XIII intro-
duction of the modern calendar http://www.astrogalaxy.ru/178.html.
N.S.: The priest does not indicate specically what formula to use, he says
something like: Do not make a nuclear bomb. Do not make hybridization of
girae with a man. Every scientist must have true faith. M.K.: You confuse
faith and morals. N.S.: Do you think that faith is not involved in the formation
of moral society? Without it, morality is decaying, as is happening now in
society. Religion is basic core of morals. Take the Europe, see the modern
attitude toward marriage, virginity, to the family tradition? Me: Terrorist at-
tacks in Volgograd in 2013. Why Russia has not announced a week of mourning
and prayer for the victims (and their families) of New Year terrorist acts? Or
are we in honor of the Great binges will move this mournful thing for the sum-
mer? She: Easy! Every day people are dying. Me: And if today all earthlings
will hang themselves, then will it also be some boring every-day event? No.
9
List of rejections
Section rejected: Universe of the Bible. Reject-or I is Creation Research
Society Quart. Reason stated: poor English. Reject-or II is The Review of
Metaphysics with no response. Reject-or III is The Journal of Theological
Studies with response: the article is unlikely to be accepted. Reject-or IV is
Journal of Creation with reason in my perception: schizophrenia and poor
English. Me: To my brothers and sisters of meant to be very kind journal. I
mean only good for you. In afterlife the survived souls will come to one table
and will discuss issues of my paper Universe of the Bible. Without any of
the current satanic hostility. Please, be more kind to people. Please make kind
Science, not evil one like they do in Phys.Rev. If You reject the paper, please
do not say: paper is rejected, but write: dear author, what can you say about
that? Perhaps we are wrong and you are right before our Lord Jesus the True
Wisdom.
10
3 Battle with satan
G.N.: The evidence for God is well documented but the most compelling ev-
idence is the fact that mans constant search for meaning and transcendence
has dominated all human history. Man cannot live consistently and happily
within an utterly meaningless, materialistic worldview. Me: From perspec-
tive of Truth, Who is Jesus Christ, the atheists is trained organization of sa-
tanic ghters, they all are not well-meaning (cf http://youtu.be/VnIH4gomOqc,
http://youtu.be/jCvQfr

t-e8). Thus, you better to share such deep pearls with

audience meant for them, read: Matthew 7:6.
K. E.: hahahaha, You Athiest cant handle the truth!:) Me: In a more kind
world You do not handle the Truth, the Truth handles You. But the people
do not like, that the Truth handles them completely. Because the satan will
be very mad. His followers, the vast majority of scientic community, will take
from You the job. To be follower of satan is enough to reject the promising
paper without a reason. However the reason is there. It is pleasing the dark,
destructive forces. The people do not trust the God, so they very weakly ght
the satan, making compromises with him; time after time oering him the
discouraged hearts of innocent writers.
Next to a man are Guardian Angel and demon tempter. With both kissing is
impossible. Whom do you kiss? Angel will lead you to the Cross. The tempter
can lead to the top of the world. But the wily can only destroy others and
destroy himself. The demon on worlds top will push you in the back. And
from the top of the world the way is only one: down, down into hell and Lake
of Fire.
To Love Jesus, rst one needs is to believe Him. Atheists do not believe
Him. Thus, they do not like Him. If you became believer will you be with Life
or with satan? He: According to your beliefs. Also, life is never in absolutes,
Everything depends on your point of view. Me: Just play like a child does, that
you have repented and understand, that repent and life mean according
to Orthodox Christianity. So, do you love Jesus now? Or the real hate is too
strong to love Him even in a play? He: As of now, I cannot conclusively prove
11
anything but my own existence(I think, therefore I am), so to me, My known
universe is my mind, in which I am all, God and Insignicant being. Me: So
you are King of my castle (the song). So, the king can not play? Wake up
at 6 and say: Jesus, I like You, thank You for my surviving through the night!
Then at 9 say: Jesus, I like You, thank You for my surviving through the day!
Please, give me good night sleep. Repeat this cycle during all your life. And at
the edge of afterlife say: Dear Jesus, please take my soul into better place.
So this will be the great play! Can the king do that? Yes, he can. The only
reason You reject this play is satanic hate to real Jesus. Thus, Jesus Christ is
alive!
Atheist: Faith is crutches for the lame. Me: You are not happy having
lames alive. What do you suggest, slaughter all the lames? See then, take care
of your feet. And in fact: revolution devours its own children (J. Danton).
You write about it, for you a lame is like a splinter in the brain. Be silent in a
rag. satan invented atheism. You follow atheism. So you follow satan. satan
is the deceiver. So you are lying, that you are happy with the lames on the
planet. The history of persecutions (especially in atheistic Soviet Union) has
clear showed it.
The Richard Dawkins in Expelled: No intelligence allowed said, that life
was created. You all agree? Yes, you do. So why now (Richard Dawkins In-
terviews Creationist Wendy Wright http://youtu.be/-AS6rQtiEh8) he is such
a jerk-like actor? Evolution, Evolution... He is making commercial, the book
God D. must be sold out! In Wendy video Richard hates the Darwinian
principles of life. Thus, remained are divine ones.
Atheist: prove a god exists! Me: What is existence? Do my thought and
feeling called God exist? Yes. You can not wipe out all Christians. Thus,
You will not be fully happy, ever.
Atheist: If God doesnt know what lust feels like, then He isnt all-knowing.
Me: It is enough to know, that is good to know. God is all-good-knowing. Have
You ever read between lines?
VampiricDarkDragon: God knows all. Some people go to hell. Is hell meant
12
for some people? Me: Is the prison in Your town meant for You? Yes? Then
go right in there! Why You worry? You got Your atheism. Not happy? Trying
to make theists unhappy too? Criminal.
He: What is the best evidence... of <atheistic> evolution? Me: It is really
simple: satan tells so. Let us all hate satan, missing brothers in Christ!
While an atheist is alive, does God warn him about Lake of Fire? Yes,
through us here. He rejected the warning? There is no-one to pray for him,
after he goes into afterlife? Then he will certainly burn! It is the perfect justice.
Atheist: We have not denied God. We do not believe in God. We deny your
claims that he exists. Me: You denied all our proposals to repent, to accept
the faith in true God. The true is by denition of true-ness. Thus, You denied
faith in God. Thus, shortly, You denied God.
Atheist: God is not good, because He punishes. Me: Who is better then,
concept of Holy Trinity or satan? There is no third option. The Lord Jesus is
truly good, but You are rebel, damned satanic rebel. Thus, You lie, that Jesus
is satanic evil. Repent now!
He: Atheism is not scientic, its merely lack of a belief in a god or gods.
Me: may it be not lack of a belief in a god, but strongest protest against
existence of God? He: Its not a protest either. Is not collecting stamps a
protest against collecting stamps? Me: Stamps-hater is not blaring around,
saying in every discussion Folks, ladies and gentlemen, I am not collecting
stamps! Be like me. Throw the stamps out the society. But the atheists do
that to God. Thus, they are protesting against God. Some uses God given Free
Will as weapon against God, against His desires, Feelings and plans. Behind
that army of atheists is satan. An atheist likely converts into satanist. djbare9:
atheists cannot hate on a god not proven to exist, our problem is not with god,
its with his followers. Me: In this sentence You admit, that He exists. It is
something demonic: I have problem with Bens followers. However the Ben
does not exist. Logically, if there is no Ben, then there is no Bens possession.
Thus, there is no Bens followers. Orthodox Christians (we) are followers of
God. We exist. Thus, God exists also; like the Ben, if last has at least one
follower. djbare9: I should have said followers of the idea. Me: Thus, the
13
idea of God exists. Very clever answer, where from You dig such cleverness?
In any way, You are true to atheism, like I was true to communism in USSR.
So, You never accept following formulation: God exists as idea. Am I right?
djbare9: 3700 gods exist as an idea. Me: all the gods of the nations are idols:
but the LORD made the heavens Psalm 96:5 KJV. Thus, Bible agrees, that
gods do exist and describes them. A (wo)man shall choose the God to follow.
There is Jesus Christ, who warns us about the Judgement Day. N.G.: problem
is with the religions followers. Me: So atheists have problem with Religion, not
with God. So stop criticize Him! Otherwise every observer will make conclusion,
that God exists.
Robots can be overloaded http://youtu.be/sLywJd5x3AE! We have such
ability, we are humans. Try this on Hawking: How consistent atheist talks?!
God is idea (verb to be spoils the purity of atheism). Theres idea of God
(thus, God is author of idea). Theres idea about God (thus, there is God and
sinners have got idea to crucify Him). Thus, it is madness for atheist to think
and talk. Do not kill yourself: confess this atheistic sin in Orthodox Church.
See video Hurts - Wonderful life Lyrics. They say: God is in the soul of
human, but the church is the bureaucratic machine. Me: the same they say in
the Samaritan village to banish Christ! Read Luke 9:53.
The proof: There are no mistakes in vast Bible text. Humans are making
mistakes. The Orthodox God does not (the Catholic god made some mistakes
while witch burning). Thus, Orthodox God wrote Bible. Proof of satan: he
is in New Testament. The Book wrote God, Orthodox God does not lie, thus
satan exists. At least satan exists as idea and word. Man, I am writing to save
You, so forgive me in-logical-ness in the ways God through me tries to save
You.
XENoVAR: Can you give me any observable evidence for God. Me: here are
52 089 comments and number growing (2000 comments a day)
http://youtu.be/U0u3-2CGOMQ. Too much credit for non-existence! I even
fear, that YouTube hard drive (the server) will collapse. It is very strong evi-
dence, that God exists. J.M.: About a quarter of those are mine. Me: You said
it, missing brother in Christ! The Atheism probes and proves the Orthodox
14
God! Rate of comments is 2000 a day during rst 4 weeks on Gods matter,
waaaay too much credit for non-existence, dont You think? Please, stop criti-
cizing the God. Believers in God certainly know more of God, than unbelievers.
Imagine sick someone says: I do not believe that the Africa exists, I never was
there, I never smelled it. But Africa is like shit.
He: You think that there is no dierence in believing observable/provable
facts and believing in your faith? Me: Yes, we use same word believing.
What is fact? What says Wikipedia? To have observable/provable facts,
one need to trust own eyes, own mind and certainly do not consider yourself a
soulless Darwinistic-deterministic robot. In last case You would not have caught
any facts, the all facts would have got Your Constructor, Who constructed a
robot-You. In fact, You can not be called You, if You are the soulless robot.
He: Dont let religion blind you from logic. Me: Let me guess, Your favorite
character in Star Track is never smiling Mister Spock or the Robot Data,
when he is without emotional microchip. Before deciding to become atheist,
You, dear, shall know, what Russian mean to live without the King in Your
head. who the hell said that atheists are robots? The Steven Hawking is
deadly outspoken, it is the frontier of so called progressive thinking. But the
healthy alternative exists: become soulfull member of the Orthodox Church -
the wonderful Body of Jesus Christ on Earth.
He: How about you let them nish. Me: these pseudo-experts all will be
nished, if they wont repent till great pass over or if the Orthodox God - our
True Ruler becomes too angry to keep them on Earth. Reading these comments
against such great video Evolution Vs. God, is easy to loose hope for atheists
and say a rhyme: they have Fell The well.
Atheist: the godless world is ultimate knowledge. Me: Did You go to the
home of God and did not nd Him there? Not. You have not gone into afterlife
yet. There is Jesus Christ sitting His Father right hand. Then You will actually
see Him and realize, that the huge mistake was done and which you missed to
repent.
15
4 Truth exists
Indeed, the opposite statement truth does not exists is either lie or truth.
In both ways the statement is wrong. All that does not exist can be refuted.
The truth can not be refuted. Hence, there is truth. A.M.: The intellect can
not invent, what does not exist in the Universe. Truth can not be invented.
Hence, there is no truth. Me: If invisible cat lays in a chair, latter would
seem empty. It seems empty. Hence, there is an invisible cat (storyteller and
theologian, anonymous Orthodox C.S. Lewis). i.d.: What nonsense. From
this statement it appears that there is only truth, and everything else no.
Then why should we look for truth? Me: If I tell you I have pink elephant
in the bathroom. You will not enter my apartment, I will not let a stranger.
But God sees my bathroom, knows that there is no elephant. We need God,
because I will not let You into my bathroom, but He is omnipresent. But the
fact, that I wrote this sentence: I have a pink elephant in the bathroom, is
undeniable. Written sentence exists; then the existence of the statement is true,
but not the subject of the utterance. So, there is only the Truth. If you do not
need to look for Truth, then He is found, He found us, He is always there and
everywhere: Welcome to the Kingdom of Heaven.
And if you do not recognize God, you have no foundation in truth. Then any
proof (of what and whom whatsoever) does not exist for you. What is called
insanity. The fools are out of our way!
My statement God is Verity is either true or false, isnt it? Yes it is. Thus,
the Verity in this regard exists. Thus, there is Verity. It is major step towards
believing the Jesus: I am Verity. Read John 18:37, 3 John 1:8, Psalm 22:3,
Psalm 90:4, Romans 1:17-32, John 8:32. Let us go further, my potential brother
in Christ! Is true, that God by denition is Creator, the our Father. Thus, He
is origin of everything. He is director of all destinies. Thus, He is true meaning
of all. Thus, He is Truth of all there is. He is Verity and Judge of all Things
and Lifeforms. Accept wisdom and spit on stupid satan and go into the happy
afterlife, missing brother in Christ! Me: God is Verity. D.H.: You havent
dened verity. You havent proven that your arbitrary deity exists. Me: Thus,
16
looking at Biblical Truth God is Verity you see: Uhjhjh is Yjhoykh. Are
you as atheists, completely crazy or partly dismantled in hidden mill of satan?
I am enemy of satan. You feel, like I am Your enemy. Thus, You are not
satans enemy. Atheist: There arent any gods which appear to exist. Me:
If gods do not exist, the looking at word gods your defected (by satan)
brain reads: uhi9. The Holy Trinity is basis and power-source of everyones
sanity. Without Him atheists are truly insane, they often go amok and kill
innocent people. Like Russian Communists have done. The Holy Trinity is also
the source of Love. You know, what love means? It means to put people into
jails, into closed mental clinics, to make painful surgery. To save the plant,
one must cut the dead parts of it. The demons have taken from God the basis
of knowledge, but left the Love. Why? To know how to kill people. You are
blinded? No problem, just pray: The true God, please guide me to the True
Religion!.
Who tells, what is true? They say, that 1 = 2 is false. But I would say, that
it is true and pay billions to people. Thus, in the end, all they say that 1 = 2
is true. Just for huge money.
Atheist: Prove him rst, the one, who created everything. Me: proofs are
based on belief in the Verity. God is the Verity (read the Gospel!). In God you
do not believe. Do not believe in the Verity. So, do not believe in any proof
of whatsoever. Full satanic madhouse, so atheists cut innocent people. And
satans helpers say: we do not believe in the innocence. And how can they
know what innocence is, if satans helpers have crucied Innocent Jesus Christ
with the wicked? Read Mark 15:28.
Atheist: Is there, however, still a contradiction in the order of when the rst
woman was created? Me: There are no contradictions whatsoever in atheistic
worldview: atheism does not believe in Verity. If atheists were seeing contra-
dictions, then they were seeing also the dierence between good and evil. In
the True sense.
He: Absolute true knowledge is not there in science. Me: Knowledge is there
only when science is not the false science, latter is divorced from Theology.
I personally went to physics, to nd the Truth in all things. Adam and Eve
17
rushed to the tree of knowledge, as I understand. But it was necessary eat from
the Tree of Life rst. Him they not tasted. Knowledge without Love it is
Hiroshima, it is yperite poison, it is genetically modied food, it is tobacco,
etc.
Atheist: can you tell us which was created rst, Man or the Animals? Have
you read Genesis 2:18-20? Me: Repent and Read Genesis 1: there is clear
timetable, the schedule of works. Your doubts are in fact satanic attacks on
Verity. This crazy rebel-ness prove for one, who knows the true proofs, that
atheists are not well-meaning and are taught into crazyness in hidden satans
mill: the Darwinistic school.
Do you believe that there are normal people, who do not know whether they
are awake or not? No, they are crazy, according to Psalm 52:2. With mind
resuscitated, they would realize that in the dream do not know how you ended
up in some place. And if you go somewhere, you can not go back: everything
has changed. This applies to Indian follies. The continuousness of spacetime
says, that we are not part of a computer game (The Matrix). The spacetime
does not consist of computer bits [16]. Arguments. In Matrix absurdity
any body B is collection of spacetime mathematical points of exactly zero
volume. Between points is nothing there, thus all points coincide into single
one: volume of body B is zero. 1) If in fact the spacetime is discrete (granular),
the movement of a point is discrete. So the point would suer action of
innite acceleration (as shaking when riding on the angular wheels). So, it
will ruin the point. Hence, the spacetime is not discrete. 2) Motion of a point:
at one oclock (we consider Greenwich time) it is in Jerusalem, after then it
does not exist, at two oclock it is in Moscow, then it does not exist, it is at
three in Tartu, then it does not exist... Total is: there is no point, because it
exists exactly zero seconds. In every city it pops out the nihility and then
disappeared back at once. Down with the philosophy of absurdism, read Fr.
Seram Rose http://youtu.be/cASVM-lrp3o If time is continuous, the motion
of point : at one oclock it is in Jerusalem, it is there until two oclock, and
at two oclock it is in Moscow and so on. Conclusions: A) one point, but it
is two: at two oclock it is in Jerusalem and in Moscow. Innite velocity of
18
matter? Absurd. B) The area occupied by the point in Jerusalem is exactly
zero. So the point is nowhere. Absurd. 3) Physicist Jacob D. Bekenstein
proposed a method for detecting spacetime foam, i.e. spacetime peculiarity at
Planck scale: arXiv:1211.3816. But his proposition, even in theory refutes the
foam (I feel so).
Truth does not pass the Popper criterion, which reads: scientic theory must
be falsiable. So the worse for the criterion of Popper. Either we manage to
disprove a lie, or it will do God. Atheism is not seeking the truth, hence there is
this Popper criterion; which may have been snapped from context of Poppers
talk.
For some people all around is information. There is information about God.
Thus, the God exists. But s.c. false information is out there too. It is not
the information, because it is false. Thus, around is information mixed with
mistakes and satanic lies.
5 Life is like fairy-tale
Facts are
Virgin gave birth.
Demons are afraid of the Cross. Do not look for reasons outside of the
Gospel, do not look for causes in psychology and fantasies.
our free Will and Gods omniscience.
Thus the life with God is like fairytale. God says and that happens.
So how does it works? Stop for a moment to adjust and tune the formulas,
while describing nature. They certainly do not t the demonic UFO-s! Lets
look at this spiritual and material world. Creator created dierent kind of
macrosystems: stars, volcanoes , comets , planets , quasars... And all of them,
all the processes in them, satisfy the law of conservation of energy; and action
19
function is minimal (without spiritual intervention). You might think that these
laws do not dene the behavior of the systems, but systems only describable by
these laws. But okay, God made a system in which is the law of conservation of
energy. But we can also make an arrangement in which this law is not satised!
But it is impossible to us: numerous ideas for perpetual motion machines are
not true, in spite of all our creativity. Hence, there is a word of God, that is: all
the systems (even not invented yet) are describable by the energy conservation
law. An exception: a spiritual intervention.
Here are the natural numbers in mathematics. If no Gods word, you can not
nd the relationships, extra bells and whistles such as Fermats Theorem and
working hypotheses.
How is arranged the Nature? Perhaps by record in the Book of Life: Nature
is arranged. And every scientist can verify this.
We are impetuously curious: what is inside the electron? And I came to
realize, that we live as if in a fairy tale. And storyteller has to use his brain,
so we would consider his Story very logical not nonsense in short. Used
to be just a ower. So we invented the microscope: it is necessary to add a
paragraph in the Book of Life The cells. Then we came up with an electron
microscope: storyteller added to the Book of Life that we must see. That are
atoms. Now we made Large Hadron Collider... And the story may soon become
quite confusing. We really dig too deep.
He: evolutionists have gave you so much evidence, and you dont bother to
look into them, and believe in fairytails you believed in since you where a child.
Me: There is nothing wrong with a good Fairytale. I show it to You, dear
missing brother: even if there was no Narnia and I saw Narnia only in dream,
I still will seek the passage to Narnia and die trying, this seeking and trying is
better, than darkness and hopeless of Your underground country (cf apologist
Clive Staples Lewis, The Chronicles of Narnia). We live in Fairytale (cf apologist
Gilbert Keith Chesterton, the Orthodoxy). The authors of fairytales are people,
thus only ill persons are living in them (visit with presents a mental hospital,
like I did). But if the author of fairytale is God, then we live in fairytale. Thus,
20
not any person, who lives in fairytale, is mentally ill (song you must believe
the fairy tales http://youtu.be/io3vYgTHO2U).
The Author of our Life writes: Heaven and earth will pass away, but my
words will never pass away. (Luke 21:33 NIV).
He: the fact, that Lord gave the laws, gives us nothing in understanding
of the world. Me: believer scholars like Newton or creationists disagree with
you. How became a force? From principle of least action. The action itself,
which is minimal, has dimension energy multiplied by time. I can not see
the physics behind it. So the unique connection of this principle to reality,
is saying: the Lord created so. Why would matter obey the laws? Behold,
I, would write on paper Martila law: world wicked vodka, become water and
put a seal. But vodka will not obey this law, until the Lord breathes grace into
the law of Martila. God is holy life. Ocean of Life. The popular mistake: the
science only provides models of what really exists, but what is above human
understanding is truly the mistake. God created the Universe for us to collect
the truthful information and to build the true theories. They are Gods dizzying
Creation Plan.
The equations of General Relativity the nonlinear partial derivatives are
not calculatable even numerically. Such is my impression of them. So even
innite powerful computer can not help to tell the matter where to move. But
it moves. This is miracle. All around us is miracle. Also the fact, that we
survived through the day without bullet in our stomach is greatest miracle and
mistery. Such impression I have got from the News. The demons will kill us in
a moment, but the angels of Jesus Savior protect us.
Anyone can lead out nothingness the round square. This is called a fairy
tale. It exists only on paper, but nevertheless is there by the very fact of
existence (at least on paper). Here I write: the prince of Wonderland has a
fairytale bike, that drove smoothly as on the road well on the palace stairs. You
would not believe it: bike had wheels in the form of round squares. But it is
a fairy tale, and the reader will forgive me the violence on common sense,
which is sometimes so serious and boring. Because of square-ness the wheels t
21
into the stairs, but because of roundness they t into the plane of the road. One
quality did not impede other. Just like the electron, which I call now: wave-ly
particle.
6 Our free will and Gods omniscience
We are ying through spacetime (cf Psalm 89:10). And Jesus Christ is with
us, like He promised (see Matthew 28:20). He is like one of us, what if God
was one of us (the song, however lled with licentiousness). But He is also
outside the time, thus knowing the History in detail (see Matthew 26:34). Here
I call History as Gods omniscience of our (and His) past, present and future.
He knows our and own actions, before they happened. He is doing an action,
what supposed to happen (see Matthew 26:24), not because He cant refuse,
but because He is Holy: does not make mistakes, does not regret (see John
19:30). The ood-time repentance (see Genesis 6:6) is perhaps expression
of His strong emotion (He is lustless, but not emotionless). But what if He
decide to change the History? Then He risks. Indeed, if He would kill Kolja,
who otherwise becomes bandit and kills Gena, who otherwise becomes world
dictator. The God doesnt know, about Genas dictatorship. He just knows
the future, in which Gena was killed by Koljas stray bullet inside mothers
womb. Now, removing the Kolja, God is unleashing the Gena. God risks His
Revelation and us, if He changes the History. But sometimes He does that (as
some stories tell). So perhaps that is why He allows to live ones, who will go to
hell (see Matthew 13:29,30). Can God change His Revelations, can He change
the past, if the future was changed? No, because He is among us not in the past,
but in present, for real. And we live and make free decisions not in the past,
but now, in present. So He doesnt allow to change the past, He is Protector
of Chronology, see section 8.
God is actively involved in the events of daily life, his grace sancties every
year all waters (the Great Feast of the Holy Theophany). Otherwise, the world
would have collapsed completely.
Free will is a persons ability to violate the laws of nature, not to live after
22
the rudiments of the world (we do small miracles, like quitting smoking). Thus,
the atheistic materialism is a satanic lie.
The laws of nature God spoked out willingly. Behavior of items display these
laws. So, God invites us follow His words too. They thought, that the nature
is so constructed, that the Earth is at. But this law has collapsed, when
was discovered round Earth. But God always knew that the Earth was round.
Without the word God scientic research is meaningless (as life itself in the
representation of atheistic materialism). Extracting a law from behavior of a
system we do not know whether law is true, and they say that any rule has an
exception. Because of the quantum uncertainty principle, knowing the cause,
it is impossible to know exactly the eect (only the probability of a particular
outcome). This violates the law of causation at the micro level. Incredibly
powerful computer, even in principle can not see the future. But God by
denition - sees any point in spacetime. Therefore He perfectly sees all four
dimensional world.
So, in the time stream we violate the laws. But history is written clearly,
with all of these disorders. Last also belong to history. To change history
document does not allow the just God (see paragraph 8).
7 Dangers of doing science
The Atom Bomb. Hiroshima. But atoms consists of quarks. Can we make
Quark Bomb? No, because there is no individual quarks. But these talks
about super-weapons of pre-ood people? Only one detail: they used spells,
the contact with fallen angels. Our free will is violation of nature laws. So the
free will of fallen angels is much more dramatic violation of them. Therefore,
trying not to do magic, we can do science: study the laws in nature the
materialized will of the true God. Hereby our achievments, got by terrorists,
wont do much harm, because we can not make the Quark Bomb. You may
argue, that the treasure chest of nature is bottomless. But, actually, it has
bottom. And it only seems provide innite possibilities, because mostly we shall
correct mistakes in knowledge we already gained. And mistakes are certainly
23
there, as prime example: Black Hole Hawking temperature in two abstracts of
[13] is dierent. But must be the same, because it is his most famous discovery.
Have the World gone with true one? As next example: all scientists used
solution of dust collapse almost century, but it was wrong [14]. And my own
paper: the unreal coordinate singularity of black hole surface is actually real
[15].
Outstanding person and a successful scientist Rudolf Peierls also noticed
errors [7]; I have not got the unappreciated his work, so I can not agree with
him. Honest work on the errors, as I understand, has not begun. You postpone
everything until the Second Coming? But God speaks: Matthew 25:26.
7.1 Correcting methodological naturalism
A scientist like grim death tries to isolate his laboratory by ignoring the
spiritual forces. The current method says: even believer enters laboratory as
pretended atheist [19]. But psychics can not pretend for long [19], so it is cause
of metaphysical naturalism (atheism [19]). Atheists have most high suicide
rate [19]. So the corrected method must be writing in every paper: Believers
among us were asked to pray in their homes and communities. The signal of
Higgs boson has mass 126 Gev. Believers were asked to be thankfull in their
homes and communities. In such way the laboratory is isolated from spiritual
wickedness in high places (Ephesians 6:12 KJV). Being ashamed of God is sin
against rst commandment. The Scientic World is in guilt. So recognizing the
achievments of God is truely the Return to Innocence. This is title of present
book. See also my paper [18].
The science will not be the search for naturalistic explanations of natural
phenomena. The science in general shall be innocent investigation of all (what
is outside and inside) by all innocent methods, if they are necessary. Besides
Physics there are Mathematics, Philosophy, Art, Theology, Oratory, Medicine,
Grammar,... The Physics cant work without curing scientists (Medicine), with-
out representations of results (Art, Oratory, Informatics, Grammar), without
calculating results (Mathematics, Informatics), without developing general ap-
proaches (Philosophy) and the Sociology, Ethics, Linguistics, Psychology help
24
for cooperation. Then why they ashamed of God, at least in the papers? They
are mad: Atom Bomb, Hiroshima and ultimate goal Quark Bomb. The fool
hath said in his heart, There is no God. (Psalm 53:1). Not all, the creational
scientists (beaten Young-Earth Creationists) admit Theology. And the ob-
jectivity simply means, that your result is (or will be) useful or beautiful for
another person (not for every one, of course).
Atheist: The objective is not dependent on subjective by denition. Me: I
am surprised to hear from you about the objectivity (in atheism is no Truth by
denition). We are subjects. Object is God. Perhaps you say, that a community
is the object? Then how Hitlers Germany has arranged Holocaust? All what
is commonly accepted, but originated in humanism, is subjective. As example
the discovery of the Higgs boson. Who sanctied apparatus, who held a prayer
service against evil spirits? So again it is subjectivity: cursed demons perhaps
staged all of these signals (more than ve sigma).
Let the science be, be as there is existence called Holy Trinity; be not only
the Physics; be in general the good desire to understand, learn, accept as fact
or just feel all of the good.
The world in which quantum physics is not complete without a live observer
is spiritual and material. Creation of a Spiritual: Einstein said, that really
wants to believe, that the moon is there even, when Einstein was not looking at
it. And spirituality is above the materiality. If the journal N. had elementary
Love to us and Faith in Verity, it would have opened to look in at least one
manuscript sent to them from the man in the street. Look within Orthodox
Christianity themes spiritual look, spiritual person, spiritual beauty, the
Google might help.
The Orthodox martyr, Fr Daniil Sysoev writes in [6]: Scripture is not a
textbook on astronomy and geology, but without it all the sciences are a lie,
that destroys the soul. Revelation should not replace the researches of scien-
tists, but serve as the worldview foundation for them. How much better would
develop medicine, if most scientists would not believe in evolutionary stories
about rudiment organs! How less suering would be in the world, if the Nazis
and the Communists did not believe in the evolution! Science must return to his
25
master the Theology, from which it ed during the Renaissance; if humanity
wants to survive on this fallen planet. True the word of the Ultimate Wise, that
the Earth shakes when a servant... displaces her mistress (Proverbs 30:21-
23 NIV). The science, this servant, imagines himself as a god, and not our
business to kneel before this naked king. On the contrary, we must learn to
distinguish between, what is a genuine discovery of science, from a humanistic
and evolutionary nonsense.
People made Science, dierent people are making dierent science. Thus,
there are bad and good sciences. Science based on Creationism is Gods one,
science based on Darwinian Evolution is satans one and lead people to self-
extinction. My science has proven our Hope, it is the study of the Shroud of
Turin the material print of Jesus miraculous resurrection. Also scientic in-
vestigations of the Holy Fire; the Lanciano Miracle; the chrism coming from
the icons; appearance of icon copy on kiot glass and other miracles. He: direct
me to... creation science papers... in reputable peer reviewed scientic jour-
nals. Me: Reputable, which ones? Reputable by Creationists or Darwinian
Evolutionists? There are two Sciences, each one has own journals. The Nature
is not our journal. Choose the Gods side in this war. Not any article in Nature
(and other God-rejected journals) is useless for us. We use their results. See
lm Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.
Physics is dierent, by the people. Here I prove it. News: fell the meteorite
with strange composition. The reaction of scientists on the Truth: God made
the composition of the meteorite as He wanted and might quipped with it.
metaphysical naturalism: there are no miracles!
methodological naturalism: miracles do not consider,
Creationism: Miracles explore,
Brahmanism: there is no world to begin with! Thus, there was no meteorite!
26
8 My proofs of God
Einsteins theory allows even from ordinary materials, to make a time ma-
chine to travel back in time (my not appreciated calculations, as well as a time
machine of Mr. Ori). Then the confusion, the mess must to occur (e.g., Grand-
father Paradox) unravels the God Himself: breaks the time machine before its
rst start, and punishes the presumptuous ones.
Right here was rigorously proved, that the right understanding of God is
absolutely necessary in Physics: Read section 5 in [10].
8.1 Vacuum mystery
This is my paper published in [17]. Is known, that any material (air, wood,
cosmic void, etc) at absolute zero of temperature is vacuum. Indeed the con-
dition with lowest energy is called so. Nevertheless the compounds of vacuum
have the zero-point vibrations. Therefore, vacuum has huge energy (even in
cosmic void). Its scientic mystery, why such high energies dont aect the
Universe.
I have another opinion, but perhaps the solution is following. Suppose we
have vacuum substances A and B. The A has more energy, than B. Let A touch
B. Thus, energy of B must increase. Therefore grows the temperature of B. But
that is impossible, because temperature of A is absolute zero, therefore the A
can not warm anything. Ive got a contradiction, thus A doesnt inuences the
B. Theres no interaction at all. Parts of vacuum dont interact with each other
not through any of interaction kind (not gravitationally, not electromagnetically,
not weakly, and not strongly). Such disintegrated energy can not inuence the
parameters of Universe.
Naturally, before the World appears was only God (see also, Genesis 1,2). If
inside the God somehow quantumly on itself appears the planet, then it quickly
cools down and disintegrates into vacuum pieces. For example, a rose in liquid
hydrogen is incredibly brittle. Solution of the disintegration problem: to supply
object with external energy (then the temperature wont decrease).
So appeared our Universe, and Ive got proof: we are not alone. Someone
27
(and not somewhat) is giving us energy to live (in all senses).
With what temperature you can compare the hells re? Hardly its a billion
degrees. There is always grater number. Only impressive choice is absolute
zero. In hell theres no communication between sinners. In vacuum also no
interconnection. Thus, theres analogy between hell and vacuum. Without
interconnection is also no light in vacuum. Biblical descriptions sound fearsome:
total darkness, darkness outside (outside our Universe, may I say). In vacuum
is no live - only death, lifelessness.
In hell is re, but is the darkness. You can not give the ashlight signal
in a vacuum substance. Quote: using refrigeration one lowers the tempera-
ture of the medium, through which the light passes, to near absolute zero... is
hard greatly to slow down the light it requires extremely low temperatures
(Baygelou... to 57 meters per second) Jim Wilson, Igry so svetom, Popul-
yarnaya mekhanika 7(21), 2004, www.popularmechanics.ru.
When we turn away from God, then we ourselves are cutting the ow of the
live energy. We are cooling down - becoming vacuum.
28
9 Universe of the Bible
Abstract Following Newtons example I am applying the current state of sci-
ence to the Bible verse: And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim
to the other: it was round all about, and his height was ve cubits: and a line of
thirty cubits did compass it round about (1 Kings 7:23 KJV). I am sure that this
molten sea is a mystery of the wise King Solomon and it has to be solved. This
results in a still undisproved Biblical model of the Universe, which has a closed
Friedmann (FLRW) metric with a denite 27.1 Gpc (giga parsec) of geomet-
ric scale. This quiets any critical voice (www.tektonics.org/lp/piwrong.html)
against Biblical Pi (), bringing glory to the God of the Bible, its true author.
The Biblical Universe also includes me. Thus, I reveal in own style my (re)views
on many relevant topics; e.g. dark energy, speed of gravity and light.
9.1 Introduction
Creation scientists talk about the astronomically small probability of self-creating
the rst simple organism. But, if the universe is innite, or there are many
parallel universes (the so called Multiverse), this point is under attack from
evolutionists. There seem to be innite possibilities. For me, it is easy to
reject the Multiverse idea because, between parallel universes, there is noth-
ing (the absence of space and time). All universes coincide with ours. In-
deed, as ingeniously expressed by K., if there is nothing between two points
A and B, these two points coincide A = B. So there is only one universe
- ours. Notably, the multidimensional String Theory was recently disproved
on trans-Planckian scales [16]. Science under the dictation of macroevolution-
ism cannot answer the fundamental question [24]: Is the universe innite in
space or the opposite - closed, like some wonderful treasure chest. Astro-
physicists (project Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (abbr. WMAP)
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni

shape.html) say only that it has a topol-

ogy scale larger than 24 Gpc [24]. I asked them: how topology scale is related
to geometric scale, but got no answer. No time? Not true! There will be no
time (see Revelation 10:6), when Judge Jesus will return and there be eternity
29
to think what we have done wrong with our current time.
Also correcting the use of language is over my head and wallet. Shall we
stop doing Creation Science till Jesus Christ returns and we will really serve
each other? And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all
(Mark 10:44). I am like cripple in language, but perhaps very good with ideas.
In fact, Im the cripple. You are very good with Grammar and style. Why not
we come together in this fallen world? Creation scientists at The Institute for
Creation Research denied helping us (me and even famous Kent Hovind, who
put his words for me). Busy, hurry.
Creational work previously done on Biblical Pi is discussed in the summary
below, but I ask the reader to follow me successively through the text to develop
complete understanding. Besides the Sections devoted to the molten sea, there
are Section 9.3 and Section 9.6. I disarm Big Bang through its virtualization
in Section 9.3. This is just the Omphalos hypothesis [25, 26] written in a more
attractive manner for creationists because many depart along side tracks, as
it written in Wikipedia. One of these divergent tracks is the changeable c
hypothesis. I criticize it in Section 9.6.
9.2 On Calculus
Let us draw a circle in the closed Friedmann universe [27]. The idea is to assume
squared interval ds
2
= c
2
dt
2
+ R
2
(d
2
+ sin
2
(d
2
+ sin
2
d
2
)). Scale factor
R expands with time t. We get the perimeter of the circle L = 2R
0
sin =
30 cubit and diameter 2a = 2R
0
= 10 cubit, where metric spatial coordinate
= /6 and scale factor R
0
= 30/ cubit. The 30 and 10 are in 1 Kings 7:23.
The molten sea was observed in Solomons temple. The diameter of the
observable universe is 2a = 28.3 Gpc [28]. Thus, one cubit symbolizes 2.83 Gpc
and, therefore, at the present time R = R
0
27.1 Gpc.
There is help coming from WMAP specialists. They have great biblical
names. But I still do not know: Is topology scale d in [24] our geometrical
R? However, these specialists distinguish geometry and topology. Their paper
possibly constrained R
0
, but my model survived: 27.1 Gpc > 24 Gpc. The new
paper [28] restricts for at universe d > 27.9 Gpc, but we have not a at, but
30
a closed universe. Today in 2013 I made the conclusions: the topology scale d
and geometry scale R
0
are unrelated; and that there are serious hints in favor
of nite Universe.
9.3 On Virtual Big Bang
Possibly the height of molten sea is the time as c t, perpendicular to the at
map of the universe - the surface of the sea, just like we draw it in Penrose
diagrams. I am using the molten sea as an analogy to build a model of the
Universe. I am making it clear that this idea is not necessarily implied by the
text, but is the authors analogy. In 1 Kings 7:23, the height of molten sea
equals its radius, just like it would be in an unexpanded universe (as written in
Wikipedia). It was unnecessary to show expansion in the sea because science
was capable of revealing it. Thereby, Big Bang was unreal, virtual. God does
not violate us. Jesus Christ remained on Cross. I stand at the door, and knock
(Revelation 3:20 KJV).
His Wish must have somehow created the universe at coordinate time t
5508 BC (see squared interval above). The brim, as well as water surface, has
same height - the same coordinate time everywhere! God chooses one way to cre-
ate, which is polite, non-aggressive (conference Creational Science Today held
4 May 2011 in the Holy Aleksievskaya desert http://youtu.be/5wOlQg

cEhY)
to eye, and really free (go out and look at the majestic sky!). This is my answer
to the false history criticism in [25, 26].
So there was no Big Bang, but God the Father created expansion and relic
light (microwave background radiation) as if the Big Bang acually happened. In
my opinion, this virtual Big Bang is part of Gods creation plan realized in 5508
BC, which thus shall be further studied [25, 26]. Without this knowledge, we
would not know that the universe is nite (we are putting a ne point on this),
and the visible part is not the entire Universe (WMAP, Ref.[28]). Only the
necessary things would be surrounding you in connement in a mental hospital.
But we are free, thanks to Jesus Christ (cf John 6:56), so we have unnecessary
things as well, like the hidden parts of the universe, which angels can only
observe and admire. But if you will Orthodoxically, fundamentally, follow the
31
Church - this ship through a cruel world - you will also be like the angels (cf
Mark 12:25).
Any nearby galaxy is gravitational lens and shall cast a shadow [33]. Paradox
within shadows could be another one of Gods cues, that there is articial virtual
history [25, 26]. God is like Painter, Who paints very good (Genesis 1:31) even
bizarre dark matter, which is thoughtfully remoted from us: [34] and Nine Signs
are like paintings in the sky: http://kp.ru/daily/25735.5/2725392. In [32], it is
written: cosmic microwave radiation is supposed... to be lensed by foreground
galaxies-but it isnt. This miracle is described in [4]. Later the papers [5]
unconvincingly (less than needed 5 sigma) show, that miracle has disappeared.
Might it be temporal miracle?
God created already cosmic rays of ultrahigh energies in ight at 5508 B.C.
Therefore we can not determine their sources. Another miracle.
Four of Gods Nine Signs: light pattern of the DNA helix (sign 1), question
mark ? (sign 2), accent mark ! (sign 3), and innity sign 4. I have
them interpreted that way: Dear Human (sign 1), See, I have set before thee
this day life and good, and death and evil Deuteronomy 30:15 KJV (sign 2)
choose life Deuteronomy 30:19 KJV (sign 3), the power of an endless life
Hebrews 7:16 (sign 4).
9.4 Neverwas history
The world was created 5508 B.C. The God has immediately succeded and ev-
erything started working. Because of His innite wisdom and omnipotence,
there is no failed attempts. So to the innitely ne details (because there is no
grain space) the present and future were established in 5508. But the present
and the future does not happen without the past. After all, many of the laws
of physics are reversible: if there appeared ying Earth, then it ew not out
the Sun, if Adam would calculate its virtual path prior to 5508. Otherwise
were be no (real) circular orbit around the Sun. The past is virtual, is Gods
Plan of creation. The Plan, but not the Creation. So the time prior 5508
is virtual, neverwas time. As an engineer draws a drawing of the building
32
up to the smallest details, and then starts pouring the concrete. You say, that
Earth ying out of the Sun is absurd? The Soul Doctors prescribed spoon of
absurdity is also in the Big Bang. Where are the relic neutrinos (the blast
shards)?
At the time of the Creation the world must be natural not to scare people.
To get the natural pattern at the moment of Creation, He must rst has a Plan of
Creation. How to get it? How to draw a picture? Too many degrees of freedom:
a blank canvas contains potentially endless possibilities, although the informa-
tion elements are only 12 elementary particles (six quarks and six leptons) plus
the interaction bosons. As an analogy, consider the equation for the growth of
fractals and let the computer go. The powerful machine almost immediately
gives the virtual result. Then move it to a real canvas, but not mechanically:
add ber of the Soul, His zest http://pogoda.mail.ru/article.html?id=39455.
Pass the World through His redaction http://kp.ru/daily/25735.5/2725392. Cre-
ated world is full of wonders, as the signatures of the Creator. Pulsating object
appears much older than phenomenon, which gave him life
http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=673104
The Neverwas history is not real? Then what is reality? In physical theories
are s.c. virtual movements, which never happen in nature (Wikipedia Vari-
ational Principles). The Bible is true. Genesis is true and there is no word
about the Big Bang. God the Father created the old young world. As scien-
tists have produced young, but old Dolly the sheep. How could the plants
appear before the Sun? Fight the disproved hypothesis, which is still deadly,
the Darwinian macroevolution!
The harvest truly is great, but the labourers are few (Luke 10:2 KJV). Alas,
it is not grace Pushkin century. Now gay writhes on gay and men put eyes on
me. Shameful statistics: there is hardly one accredited doctor of physics, who
is preaching the date 5508 of Creation. In Fr. Daniil Sysoevs Hexaemeron
Against Evolution (the compiler is killed) is one such weakness, that leads me
into despair. It is at the end of the book. Yes, the Quotes of Great Minds are
strong. But most of these great minds are dead. All, without exception, cited
in defense of Hexaemeron (date 5508) the Greats are born in the nineteenth
33
century. In Pushkins century! Who are the modern apologists, defenders
of 5508? I am still not convinced, that the accredited PhD-s are in Gods
little ock. Why? It is impossible to have piece inside and outside on this
acid-like planet; and if one makes the compromises, the Gods image looses
the Gods grace, thus, surrounds to satan. Outside are very few ghters for
Young Earth Creationism, more fewer are with PhD (especially grim picture
is in physics), but they are in piece with satan: they are still not Orthodox
Christians. The Hexaemeron can be proved: http://www.halos.com, Robert V.
Gentry (Wikipedia, see also on CreationWiki).
Where the shit ows from, i.e. who is lying? 1) The dead Academic
Altukhov Yuri Petrovich is Darwinist (Russian Wikipedia), 2) Academic Y.P.
Altukhov is Creationist: very solid Russian movie The hypothesis of the cen-
tury! http://youtu.be/IHGE63EMiwA. For whom the Wikipedia (?) ocially
lies and why? For whom, for what horned ideology Wikipedia works? Such the
obvious grin of evil! The Viktor Tsoi is right: if there is darkness, then must
be light.
9.5 Supporting the Biblical Model
Let us read further: Below the rim, gourds encircled it-ten to a cubit. The
gourds were cast in two rows in one piece with the Sea (1 Kings 7:24 NIV).
Outside the visible universe is a large, strange area with a ball ornament (see
Barness Note http://bible.cc). I read there: twice (2x) 10-cubit-row. So I have
two numbers on the Journey to the Edge of the World: the distance to the
special point is a + 10 = 15 cubit, and the distance to the most distant point
is 2x 15 = 30 cubit. In our FLRW metric, the circle of maximum perimeter is
R
0
/2 = 15 cubit away, and the most distant point is R
0
= 30 cubit, which is
in perfect harmony with Bible verse.
Let us read 1 Kings 7:25. The twelve living beings are the Church of 12
Apostles. The Church holds the universe, being its fundament and (common)
sense. They turn their faces to the pagans and bring the Gospel to all sites.
They go in the Spirit of the Trinity (Holy Spirit) because they are by Three.
The sea is also described in 2 Chronicles 4:2-6, where I can see a cue for
34
the virtual part of the universe history (the height of the sea is larger than the
actual thickness of it).
When Jesus Christ returns in glory, something will happen to spacetime (the
stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the universe will be shaken Mark
13:25 GWT). Our sea is a symbol of current spacetime. So, logically, there was
no more sea (Revelation 21:1 KJV). Because no eye has seen, no ear has heard,
and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love him (1
Corinthians 2:9 NLT).
9.6 Speeds
I use the mainstream paradigm, stating that the speed of light is a fundamental
constant (see [29]). Even if many saw changes in c, it might be long-term
supernatural provocation. Our Church is a commune of ghters not against
esh and blood, but against... spiritual wickedness in high places (Ephesians
6:12 KJV). Do not watch broadcasted UFO-hypnosis in literally high places.
Through this c = const faith, the Large Scale Universe as Gods creation is
deeply studyable. It is human tuned (see also Birges reason in [29]). Because
the c is maximal velocity of material body, than the c relates traveled space
to time. So even space perturbation (gravitational wave) cannot cover more
space than it allows lightspeed. See also [30] and media report with critics
http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2003/split/620-1.html.
I turn to Holy Trinity in my scientic proofs about nature. But one can take
and the intermediate agencies the Holy angels, the Holy humans. After all,
the saints are the true sanes, the angels in the esh; they stoop the grace
of Heaven to Earth. The gift of creativity is given to humans. Yes, the writer
creates information. The Bill Gates is father of his computers, hereby the
Holy Trinity is origin and owner of Bill. The writer is not just summarizing
the materials: otherwise a robot could do it. But online robot-translator does
not understand a thing, it mostly outputs a stupidities! The divine spark (gift
of creativity) is no in the translator. He: In the end, the observed is a
kind of integration of sensory signals, and you can hardly move away from it;
35
and despite all the eorts to build an abstract representations, at their core
always lies the sensation. Me: I see no problem. It is known, that the human
brain is designed and works much more complicated, than the entire universe
does. Therefore, we, with the help of Our Lord, are objective metewand of the
reality. Through our sensors. After all, for us and for our sake is set up and
ne-tuned universe, not for mystical aliens.
V.S.: How many feelings a healthy human has?
http://mistermigell.ru/post180673530/. F.M. Kanarev http://kanarev.inauka.ru.
Misconception: ve. Reality: at least nine. Me: How powerful is the holy ruler
of nature (cf. Luke 16:1)! V.S.: Vision, hearing, taste, smell, touch this
is, what we know from school. We add to these ve the four: termotseptsiya
(feeling of warmth), ekvibriotseptsiya (sense of balance), nociception (feeling
of pain) and proprioception (understanding where are parts of our body, even
when we do not feel and do not see them. Close your eyes and shake leg
you will still know, where is your foot).
Let me note that the creational paper [29] does not include Gods name.
But with Him, Holy One, all questions (conference Creational Science To-
day http://youtu.be/5wOlQg

cEhY) are solvable! Remember these phrases:

it is Gods Will, it is Gods Plan, it is what God allowed. Because is written:
Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest
(Matthew 11:28 KJV). The head and heart do not rest in mainstream jour-
nals. They do not mention God. They worship and respect nothing! There
is description of nothing in Wikipedia and in lm The Never Ending Story
(http://youtu.be/KCAK0D7mPQ0, http://youtu.be/CrG-lsrXKRM). Our closed
universe also has no boundaries (like world in the lm) but will pass.
9.7 Summary
The often dicult to understand (some of the Critics and Apologetics in
http://www.tektonics.org/lp/piwrong.html) numbers in 1 Kings 7:23 can occur
in a closed Friedmann Universe, where the perimeter devided by diameter is
always less than . Following simple cues, like arranged guides, I have got a
scale factor of 27.1 Gpc. This universe is round (in an abstract four-dimensional
36
euclidean room) like the surface of an imagined ball (Section 9.5), which has a
radius of 27.1 Gpc. So the most remote point (one on opposite site) is 27.1
Gpc 278 billion light years away from us.
The current state of creation science shall be the described Biblical Model of
Universe until someone constrains out the scale of 27.1 Gpc. But, because the
most severe constraint cannot reach 28 Gpc, (read [24]), the line of termination
will be always on the very edge of the Biblical Model. In case 27.1 Gpc is
wrong, I will take the next possible number between 27.1 Gpc and 28 Gpc (but
the current Biblical model would be disproved). Why? Take into account that
God is not forcing us into a Biblical World. So, as I can accept, He left the
Biblical Model in balancing between proof and disproof.
There is a rational explanation of rational , see illustration in [31]. However,
the beings must hold the Sea, 2 Chronicles 4:15. So the Author of Bible, God,
gives man the freedom to accept or reject my paper. As written above, it was
unnecessary to show the expansion of space. But King Solomon qualitatively
did it anyway. Look at picture [31] and read: the brim thereof was wrought like
the brim of a cup, with owers of lilies (1 Kings 7:26 KJV). Hereby, horizontal
expansion is accelerated in time. Latter is the height of the molten sea. The
year 2011 has Nobel Prize for the accelerated expansion... It was always in the
Bible! As it was once (and still is, by the Flat Earth Society) a disputed fact
that the Earth is a terrestrial globe (Verse 3 Ezra 11:32 you nd in Russian
http://rusbible.ru/sinodal/3ezd.html).
One is too sure, that the technical construction of sea was not supernatural,
as [31] implies. But the very description in 1 Kings 7:23 denitely guides our
mind towards asking questions or takes someone like me to the horizons of
curved spacetime. Verily, this is certainly part of the miracle.
Look at the graphic in http://www.astronet.ru/db/msg/1174484/node5.html
and elevate the start by the vertical line - ination expansion at the rst
moment after Virtual Big Bang. You get a prole of a (horizontally lying) cup
or lily, exactly as the Bible verse says. The 30 cubits line in 1 Kings 7:23
denitely separates the virtual (13.75 billion years < t < 5508 BC) and real
37
history (5508 BC< t < 2012) of the universe. The blessed year 2012 is xed
date because it is historical moment. The mystery of molten sea opens. The line
is not imaginary, it is translated as snurok in Synodal Translation. Snurok from
the historical dictionary means lace, cord, string, braid, twist, twine, pull, and
interwoven chain (as in 2 Chronicles 3:16). Truly, snurok is very good (Genesis
1:31)! This line itself is the moment (week) of Creation in 5508 BC, read the
emergence of the world of Narnia (C.S. Lewis). In realistic quantitative scale
(Section 9.3), this line almost exactly coincides with the circular brim of molten
sea. But, if construction was not supernatural, this line qualitatively found its
place below the brim.
However, 1 Kings 7:23 does not say line below the brim. The verse de-
nitely ignites our critical minds with rational . There is a suspicious coinci-
dence that diameter of this line circle would naturally be 30/ cubits, which
is just the scale factor R
0
derived from general relativity (Section 9.2). And it
is called the main body [31], like astrophysicists called their scale fundamental
domain [28].
I shall study the theme further. I need many friendly hands (and maybe a
grant) for going further because Jesus is the Way, as many Holy Fathers say.
9.8 Using the Biblical model
In a simplication that the pressure elements of materia tensor are almost
zero compared to density (it holds very well for not singular states of liquids
and gases), the Biblical model more beutifully suits the experimental points.
Hereby the actual Biblical model satises the scientic criteria: it has falsia-
bility (refutability).
The variant without dark energy is excluded: any possible curves are close
to line (1) dismatching the experimental points (see Fig.1). Vertical lines at
points show the range of a result: it can be anywhere on the vertical line, but
also outside of it, which is less likely.
In such case can we distinguish betwean dierent k? The Biblical model has
k = 1; space-innite models have k = 0 (simplest and most popular) or k = 1.
38
Figure 1: Picture from internet. My numerical blue line (3) more perfectly matches the experimental points.
Analytic solution (1) has k = 0 and is without dark energy. It matches the
m
= 1 line of Ref.[35]. Line (2) is
the thick line
m
= 0.3, k = 0 from Ref.[35].
Possibly. Take k = 1. The line (2) is not perfect: entire 4 points are out of
standart range. But curve (3) with R
0
= 27.1 Gpc lefts only one point out.
Note, that allready 1.5x 27.1 Gpc is bad match: 3 points out. This line is
closer to line (2). Taking higher the R
0
we get even more closer to line (2). If
you take k = 0 then solutions are at line (2), hereby my eye can not distinguish
lines of dierent R
0
. If k = 1 solution is higher then line (2), so the higher
mismatch than the line (2).
But the used set of parameters violates Einstein equations at present time.
But if to replace with 1.3 percent higher value, then Einstein equations are
satiesed and the solution is betwean (2) and (3) lines, so still having better
match, than line (2). Hereby case 5x 27.1 Gpc closely resembles line (2), being
partly higher than it.
9.8.1 Virtual Big Bang
Lets nd the moment of virtual ination. In Biblical model the edge of observ-
able Universe has = /6. This corresponds to parameter t 14.0995 billion
39
years (here is taken t = 0 for today), scale factor R(t) 53 Mpc and maximum
cosmological redshift z
m
512. The singularity has t 14.101 (it is allmost
the 1/H
0
).
Indeed, the Wikipedia tells, that the redshift of relict photons is in the order
of thousand, however found Ia supernovas have z < 2 some quasars have z 6.
Of course, not all relict light is hitting telescope right now, so the sphere of
relict lights origin is really the observable Universe.
Taking not the Biblical model: R
0
= 20 x 27.1 Gpc we get 0.02611,
singularity has t = 13.8992, the relict light has t = 13.8982, the R(t)
799 Mpc and z
m
677.
In these two models (R
0
= 27.1 Gpc and R
0
= 20 x 27.1 Gpc) the relict light is
at million years after singularity, however in Wikipedia it is allmost half million
years.
Still undisproved, but scientically disprovable (falsiable) Biblical model
tells us, that Bible is true historical document. So the nature was created 5508
BC. We can study nature, thus, getting glance into Creators mind. But study
before 5508 BC is look directly into Gods mind.
9.9 Where are Heavens?
In section 9.1 was showed, that there are no parallel universes. Then, there are
the Biblical Heavens, there are the treasures of the hail (Job 38:22)? One
could consider the reality as mathematical structure: elements m1, m2, m3,....
are things from material world we know. Elements s1, s2, s3,... are things from
Heaven. The inuence is denoted as +. The energy-impulse conservation
law tells, that allways m1 + m2 = m3, so the material world without action
of Heavens is closed, isolated laboratory (see section 7.1). Believers know, that
there is reaction s1 +m1 =?, but what is product of it? We could write on the
left the m2, i.e. produced one we see in material world (e.g., Son of God was
born). Or we can write s2, i.e. the result is seen in the Heaven (the prophet
Ilia was taken alive). Mathematician would say, that could exist reactions
s1 + s2 = s3 and s1 + s2 = m1. There is my favorite song Heaven Is A
40
Place On Earth: In this world were just beginning to understand the miracle
of living... love comes rst.
Yes, the physicists intuition fails in the Double Slit Experiment, but re-
lying on mathematics one is sure. However, we can not say that Cosmic Sin-
gularity has vanishingly small minimum volume. Such case is not in nature.
In mathematics is, but not in nature. If the volume is arbitrarily small, it is
exactly zero volume. No problem, read my section No Big Bang in [10].
41
10 An alternative to 5-sigma selection rule
Such rule says: event, which probability to happen is less than d := one in
a million, has not happened yet [36]. Contrexample: how was probable your
birth? Some of your relatives could have chosen wrong girl to marry. Its like
random numbers (very long ones) generator. The probability, that among just
seven billions of it is your code is very small. But it has happened.
I hope, You heard about Schrodingers Cat in Quantum Mechanics. It is
unlogical situation, when the imaginary cat is both dead and alive. Cat is in
limbo state as one wrote. It has the wave function. An observation collapses
this function and thus, one observes not limbo but dead or alive cat (when
opens the imaginary box).
Same limbo is with life from lifeless matter. But I have opened the box. I
have calculated, that the probability of life in Metagalaxy (observable Universe)
is less than u := 10 in minus 437. The atheistic most hope for extraterrestial
life after discoveries of Genetics (http://youtu.be/WDuu1VxqxKg) would have
been amoebas. The u is slightly better, than 1/250! (the 250! is factorial of
minimum number of proteins). The zero is not excluded, because fairy things
must be for non-zero probability, e.g. lightning, that not destroyes swimming
organical-blocks but like a fairy glue reconnects them over and over to get
working thing. The extraterrestial life was in closed box: in limbo of real and
unreal. I have opened the box by tossing a coin into the air. I called it sides
head and nut. There must be at least 1449 nuts in a row. But the head
dropped rst. Date: 10.September.2012, morning. The experiment is closed for
all times: extraterrestial observable Universe is sterile. Another tester would
violate the trueness of experiment. I, Dmitri, asked Jesus Christ to bless my
action on behalf of all mankind.
A critic might say: to open the box one need study planet after planet until
one nds the life. If there is no life, as one can conclude from silence of Genesis,
one need to check all planets in seen and unseen Universe to open the box. But
my box is box of conviction. And it was open 10 september 2012. To develope
this tactic take a normal event. Outcome A has probability 0.6, outcome B
42
has 0.4. Either outcome must not harm eternal life and salvation of me and
others. Thus, to open the box of conviction I can toss a coin (the number
of times depends of probability to be collapsed and outcomes of tossing). But
I can stay in limbo, if its needed for my research. When the event realizes
and it is against my conviction, then nothing dramatic happens. In case of
extraterrestial sterility you can either stay in limbo and search for organisms
on Mars, Jupiter of Milky Way. Or once and for all bury the idea and follow
the conviction. You dont need and can not toss a coin, because I did this for
you. If you can not decide which university to go, then please pray, go to Afon
mountain, ask a saint. But you can not toss a coin, because you dont know
probability of happiness in the end of each of two paths. And God is not an
automat. Tossing a coin I see in Bible (Acts 1:24-26), but they are saint people
guided by Holy Spirit, so it was necessary to do it. Another example: Higgs
boson is in limbo, with probability one in billion (or so) it doesnt exist. I think,
nobody was brave enough to toss a coin, so the world prefer stay in limbo or
blindly ignore the opposite talking about articial 5 sigma rule. If they followed
their own rule, they would kill the idea of extraterrestial life u d.
The News: 1) On the surface of Mars the life can not and has not existed:
Bethany L. Ehlmann, John F. Mustard, Scott L. Murchie, Nature 479, 53-60
(2011). 2) The administration of U.S. President released an ocial statement
about contacts with aliens and extraterrestrial life in general
http://beta.novoteka.ru/?s=politics#nnn15156641. The statement said that
the U.S. government has no information about the existence of intelligent life
beyond Earth, and also did not x no conrm contact with extraterrestrial
civilizations. Specially emphasized that no secret information on this issue
exists - there is no reason to hide a thing like that from the world.
From Discussion
Lets go back to the event at September 10, 2012, morning. For the collapse
of a probability of 10
437
only rst head was needed in 1449 attempts, and
for the collapse probability 0.5 the head was needed in very rst attempt.
And it has happened, September 10, 2012, for all the people. Nobody else can
replicate this unique experience. Many do not know me, but after the September
43
10, 2012, the scientic belief of all people is: Metagalaxy sterile. Alternative:
kingdom of doubts, the limbo, without any conviction. In short, even if the
probability of spontaneous generation would be 50 percent, then it has not
happened anywhere else in the Metagalaxy. Experiments of Louis Pasteur and
Miller (for almost 50 years) demonstrated that the probability of spontaneous
zing is much smaller than 1. As I have shown, it is less than 10
437
. Well,
really, take your watch and wipe it o into the powder. Then shake powder,
beat it with discharges.... How to nd the probability that in a few thousand
years (lasted after the Hexaemeron) we get the clock, ticking and showing the
correct local time? My calculations are easier: get only 250 pieces on the line
in order. This is factorial of 250. Only one combination will work. I applied
the Stirling formula. How many attempts are to get this Frankenstein alive?
In every square meter of surface (of Earth-like planet), every second, during
13 billion virtual years, happens one virtual try. The number of planets in the
Metagalaxy is about one planet per star. It would be strange if the amoeba
appeared earlier than the Creation year 5508 B.C. Where they would swarm?
Atheist: What is the probability to meet a dinosaur at the door? Exactly
one half. Because either I meet him or not. Me: It is not probabilities, but
description of events. One still need to calculate the probabilities of these
two events. Is needed the statistics for such events, which must happen often
enough.
He: perhaps probability to make the alive Frankenstein tends to zero, but
exact zero is excluded! Knowledge is not sucient to accurately determine the
zero! Me: probability depends on ones faith, knowledge and belief. Blind
evolutionist never meets a living dinosaur. And if he meets, he rather believes
in own schizophrenia. Therefore, the probability of spontaneous zing is zero for
Fr Daniil Sysoev, who is the Ortodox Martyr.
He: Zero is excluded! Me: Let us forget for a while about probabilities:
let it be perfect luck. What specic, detailed, natural mechanisms lead to
getting a living cell? With helix DNA, cytoplasm,... Given: primeval soup in
which are all the necessary material for the cell, but not combined. Material is
mixed at random. Have lightning, heaps of lightnings. What is the angle, the
44
power and the shape of the discharge barrel of rst lightning? One lightning
is not enough? Even so perfectly chosen one? Well, describe me lightning
number 2. When it must strike and where? No one can give even number
one. The weakest lightning discharge is much more than 220 volts. For sure,
such currents will not connect the two protein but will destroy them. And still
it is necessary to form the proteins from the periodic table, but note: using
natural, rough means. Hence, the scientic probability of spontaneous zing is
exactly zero. You can add the following: science does not know any way to get
Frankenstein alive. Hence, the scientic probability is absent. Synonymous of
absence is zero as being customary said. Therefore, the scientic probability is
zero. Atheistic model: world without the Creator exact zero probability,
because such model the science (no matter how pued) can not invent. Thus,
the probability of the opposite model world with God is exactly: 100 0 =
100 %.
He: do not be angry on amoebae from Alpha Centauri: they just do not know
what you told fortunes on them using banknotes. Me: the telling fortunes is
deal with the evil spirits. God will punish for it. The die is repeatedly used by
priests (read Bible and election of Patriarch Tikhon), but with the holy faith in
the miraculous intervention of God. And what do I have? I am talking about
collapse of the wave function, the random number generator, without references
to the spiritual realm.
We truly are the crown of creation. This knowledge puts on us the
responsibility for life in the universe. We are called to bury war tomahawk,
condemn and curse abortions. My house is not on the edge, but in the center,
in the epicenter. I wondered, why the war sniper tracks so hard the victim,
spends so much time on a simple soldier. Yes, because on the one living soldier
holds the worth of practically innite number of star systems.
11 Proton is like God?
Gods brushstrokes (in gorgeous pristine natural scenes) show the fact of the
Trinity for a careful look. The little book of the Martyr Fr. Daniil Sysoev In
45
simple words about the mystery of the Trinity, Moscow, 2011 has examples,
including the trefoil (shamrock).
Perhaps protons self-decay time is innite long. The three quarks in pro-
ton cant be removed away from each other, because are no isolated quarks.
This is similar to the mystery of Holy Trinity. The quarks inside proton have
the strong interaction charges called colors. And they are just three (see
Wikipedia). As in the basis of the usual color. Proton surprised the scientists,
that did not break up until now. They lost waiting enthusiasm, because there
is no action. In proton are three quarks of three dierent colors, but of the
two natures (u and d) as the Godman. Here I cross oneself with three ngers
together, and two ngers down. Created a fairy tale, I felt as quarks in the
proton communicate: all-connecting power of love and the knowledge, that the
other is always there, no matter what happens; that from any hole You will
be dragged out. One for all and all for one.
The proof, that God must be Holy Trinity.
In the book [11], page 118 the conditioned realities (CR) are arranged in a
circle: R1 = f(R2), R2 = g(R3), R3 = s(R1). As any single of them, for
example R1 = f(g(s(R1))) = R1 depends only on himself, then each of the
three is Unconditional Reality (i.e. is the God as by denition in the book
[11]). But since dependencies f, g, s are still there, the whole Trinity is one
God. This analogy is not talking about the origin, because the Son is from the
Father, and the Spirit is from the Father, but the Spirit does not originate from
the Son. The analogy speaks about relationships.
Suppose logical operation P(n) takes two logical states: true and false. If is
true, that n = 1 then n
3
= 1 is true and vice versa. That system is complete,
thus the Godel theorem of incompleteness does not hold for cyclic logic and also
the Godel theorem does not hold for Holy Trinity. I have not read the Godels
proof, so my counterexample may be wrong.
The vectors analogy of the Holy Trinity.
One scientist sought, thought, and noticed that Trinity is like the three-component
vector. However, how the Father gives birth to the Son and how the Holy Spirit
emanates from the Father, is out of the scope of this analogy. Here I will go in
46
deerent way and much further, than this scientist.
The Three in Trinity are omnipresent. Hereby they do not jostle each other.
It is possible, because at any given point of the World they are in dierent
dimensions (directions). Thus, you have basis of three spacelike vectors. The
fourth vector is timelike

t. It is not in the same dimension as Trinity. Thus,
the Trinity is in every point of space and time; but, nevertheless, is outside
the time.
Take vector

f before the Creation. By transformation you get vector s =
B

f. It is like the birth of the Son. Abother kind of transformation

h = S

f
gives the analogy of the Holy Spirit, which emanates from the Father, and
not from the Son.
Check also Is Ratio 3:1 a Comprehensive Principle of the Universe?
viXra:0907.0008.
12 Observer is needed
Who we would send to measure the temperature and pressure at the center
of the Sun? And in the center of the emerging Black Hole, from where is so
unlikely to get out? Basically, saying that according to the calculations there
is such pressure, we mean that it would measure the observer (e.g. robot) and
handed to us, if observer had appeared there. Naturally, the robot itself can
aect the pressure and temperature (especially aect the parameters of the
microsystem), breaking the purity of the measured. And how to talk about
the past or the future? There we will not send the robot (even in the future
can not, because the feedback will not come: Section 8). So, we need God.
Here is the photon, a particle of light: no robot will catch him to photograph
in ight. Therefore, saying that photon has such rest-mass; we mean that there
is God, who caught the photon and can say about it (if we ask in fervent
prayer). He: technically dicult to saddle the photon. I: And for God? He is
anywhere. Therefore, God may move at any speed. And even faster than light.
But can He touch the photon? No, because the rest-mass of the photon is zero.
Hence, the photon is the movement, if an Electromagnetic wave is a photon.
47
The observer aects the observed, no matter how hard tries not to aect.
But God can do everything, can even change the laws of nature, so if He wants
to, He would not spoil the purity of observation. Omnipresent and Omnipotent
God is the perfect observer, whom physicists must consider and use His helping
hand. At least clearly understand and write in the text, that without the God
their formulas and conclusions have no physical meaning.
In quantum physics, observation (in Jungs double slit experiment) aects
the observed at the screen http://detalimira.com/news/1315. So is considered,
but it is necessary, that the holy humen check it. A holy man has mind puried
through Holy Sacraments. In another experiment physics bypassed collapse
of the wave function (the observer has not aected the outcome). It has not
simply collapsed: http://lenta.ru/news/2013/03/04/uncertain.
The true God does not lie by denition. And if God, and not damned demon,
reveals that the calculations were correct; then we can rely on it and move on
to new discoveries.
Discussant: scientist can mentally get in the Sun. Me: like, what would I
measured, if I would be in the Sun? But it is unscientic and self-deception:
the worldly man in an imaginary ight can not take the real instruments. It is
impossible, even in principle, but in principle it is possible to become a saint.
Hereby not afraid to say With Christian Love in a letter or paper. So, the
Physics without God has no physical meaning, cf Matthew 7: 26,27. And what
a sinner (and without Gods suerance) mentally penetrates into my apartment
and counted (for the proof) the number of books on the top shelf?
That Poppers criterion of physical scientic theory: latter is falsiable (pos-
sibility of refutation). With the adoption of God, all the theories meet this
criteria: God Himself can tell whether a theory is true. Another sign of phys-
ical scientic theory: it is veriable (can be checked). How to instantly check
the temperature in the center of the Sun or the emerging Black Hole? Read the
Matthew 19:26. Hence, all theories correspond to this criterion, if scientists are
not ashamed of God. Then worldly scientic criteria are replaced by the divine
truth criterion: a straight answer from God, the answer to fervent prayer. Here
for example, we read on the Internet: Down with aliens lieth with a beast.
48
It disturbs us. Ask the God, and He would reassure. Read the Matthew 11:28.
This is Return to Innocence in Physics and not only there. Read the John 15:5.
He: Grass is not green, it has no color. I: The world does not exist without
the observer (see Quantum Mechanics). So the sane one can not talk about the
grass in isolation from the whole spectrum of feelings and thoughts of observer.
We see the green grass. So the grass is green. He: I see the green grass,
but I understand that it has no color. I: You risk to understand everything
and to leave no room for Mystic: Alice begins to grow and will destroy her
wonderland. VG: To be consistent to the end, it must be admitted that there is
no grass, too. Me: But its creepy to be consistent to the end. Isnt it better
to go slightly mad? In case one has decided to go mad.
Physics need God. Even Laplace needs Him, despite the Sir, I have no need
of that hypothesis. The famous Laplaces demon is so fast and powerful,
that it is the Orthodox God, and not some pathetic demon! Loving God in our
life, we can move ahead, but without atheism.
Came information: In quantum physics is s.c. problem of observer, hereby
the observer is subject, not object. It is solved for static case, and solu-
tion for dynamic case is not expected today. Me: 1) Who will observe the
observer? The miraculous Holy Trinity. 2) How the known solution relates to
Godels incompleteness theorem? 3) The observer may well be static, because
the unchanging God observes. The True Physicists are like wise men, who
saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped
him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts;
gold, and frankincense, and myrrh. (Matthew 2:11).
49
13 Life of numbers?
Z.E.: The rational is meant for Science and irrational is for Religion. It can
not be confused. Brain will ache! Me: In science is only rational? And how
about irrational numbers? So You disagree to call the Pi as irrational? Then
please suggest in Wikipedia the new description of Pi, the atheistic one. The
Pi is irrational, but the 3.14 is not. Dear, the irrational is not nice word in
atheistic worldview. So please, rename the irrational Pi. You must hate word
irrational, if you are still atheist. It certainly does not suit the respectable
Pi. So, please edit the Wikipedias article on Pi, if you are so low in theism.
You can not be fully in atheism latter is grim death of brain and soul. What?
Several meanings of irrationality? I suppose, if the Pi would carry name divine
Pi or atheism is stupid Pi, You swallow it also?
Here numbers k and n are integer. Take two shits of paper A and B. Which
one is wider? Put them close together and You will see. Now You want to
measure the degree of dierence. Make some copies of A, put them in a row,
until they all together will be wider than B. Thus, You are able to say, that B
is wider than 10 copies of A, but smaller than 11 of A. Shall the A be etalon.
How to make smaller etalons? Take an object F and make some copies of it,
put them in a row. If they not perfectly coincide with A, than change a bit the
size of F. It must be nF = A in order the F is found. Now the F is etalon.
make k copies of it and put them together: S = kF. You will be knowing S, it
is the new etalon. The S = (k/n)A. The (k/n) is so called rational number.
Here I have attached numbers to lengths of objects. Thus, mathematics is
attached to physical spacetime. The line of numbers is continues, as is brought
in [12]. Thus, one can imagine, that spacetime is also continues.
You have object X for study, it may be length of a circumference X = ,
which diameter is one meter. Do we know the X? We have not found the length,
but the information (which we got) has xed it. Assuming, that spacetime is
not curved. But it is curved. So, we really do not know the X. We shall
measure it. What if it is irrational?
The irrational Pi does not expressed through sum of etalons, otherwise the
50
Pi would be the etalon itself. We know properties of it, such as 3 < < 4,
3.12 < < 3.5, but do not know the Pi itself. Yes, the Pi is innite sum of
rational numbers
= 3 + 1/10 + 4/100 + . . . = 3 +

k=1
p
k
10
k
,
where p
k
can take values 09. But no one has found them all. Moreover, it
is believed (for my knowledge not yet proved), that the spectrum is fully
stochastic, thus the is used in random number generators. Does the Pi
exist? Yes, but as a process, as our tendency to perfect knowledge. Analogously
the can be expressed as
= 3 +

k=0
h
k
2
k
,
where h
k
can take values 0 and 1. This is decimal code: (0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,. . . ).
Can one prove, that is not rational? I see no way to prove that: the may
have innite serie of members in the code.
One can say, that the number 0.99999 . . . 0.99(9) is irrational, however it
tends to 1. But just because it does tend, I think it has some irrationality. The
number, which square tends to become 2, is the irrational

2. But what about

the irrational ? It is the perimeter (divided by the diameter) of a regular
polygon, which is incerted into the circle, hereby the number of angles tends
to innity. The innocent desire (tendency, aspiration) is a life, isnt it? But
that lives, the ? God lives, then we live, then we revive mathematical science.
Thus, the God revives the formulas: He is outside the time, thus He is just
created Fr. Adam.
May I suggest own problem of millenium? Who knows, may be the k
2
= 2 n
2
has at least one pair of integers k, n, and so the

2 is rational number after

all. Please prove it. The Fermats Last Theorem [9] gives, that 2
1/m
, m 3 is
irrational number. It is at least mine observation. But how they have grasped
the actual innity (see Hilberts Prohibition of Actual Innities in [11]) of
information, our list {p
k
}? Truely, the humans are made in Gods image, thus
are making wonders outside nitness, read Sec.14.
Here is our irrational desire to overcome the light barrier: v c. Here
is our irrational desire to open the doors to New Physics: just to demonstrate
51
that the dierence of the gravitational and inertial masses IR := m
g
m
i
is
not zero. So for the moment the IR is an irrational number.
Let irrational may be strictly dened, but it is not exactly known, not
grasped. Also, while speaking of God, we denitely know of Whom we are
speaking. But He is great, very great! We just love Him and love nature, neigh-
bors. Love Him most. Tips are not for all occasions: Live as in paradise! Work
as if you do not need money! LOVE as if no one has hurt You. The Grisha
Perelman, the mathematician, lives in own miracle world. Renounced worldly
million! Read Luke 20:25.
14 We all have the power (song Life is Life)
He: Now an atheist needs to make one asking people to show proof or observable
evidence of a higher being. Me: Who is higher being? Of course: it is the
president Barack Obama. He is higher educated, has higher power than average
American. But he also has room for growth: he can make Orthodox politics.
There are critical situations, in which there is no time for decisions (car
accident, war, plain crush). But they decide correctly. Also the normal situation
of Mathematical Wunderkinds: they calculate in no time like PC. Thus, the time
is not crucial for choosing and Free Will.
15 All knowledge is faith
Exact knowledge is in fact the faith. Indeed, many ones do not believe even,
that knowledges or truth exist. They would say: there is no knowledge, besides
one very simple knowledge I know, that nothing else I know. But it is false
knowledge the satans lie, mistake or self-deceit. False knowledge (or false
faith) is not the knowledge (or faith), because former is false. Thus, anyone
must believe in the true knowledge; thus, any knowledge is trust, is faith. The
knowledge is strongest faith and vice versa.
Is God true? Yes, the God is Verity by denition.
They knew, that Earth is at. This was false. But we have organization
52
Flat Earth Society (check the Wikipedia). They all are knowing. I know
better.
To explain a thing one uses words, describing terms. To explain these words
one uses other words. Thus in the end, there are basic words, like God,
which we hold as faith. Aristotle the father of logic taught that in basis
of knowledge is the faith, page 106 in [11]. Therefore all knowledge is faith
confession. It is so important to recognize, because it does not allow to fall
into the atheistic abyss. After all, if the false knowledge there is no God, is a
very strong belief of imbeciles army (Psalm 52), then one can refuse to accept
such demonic faith in favor of the Orthodox faith. For example, a ctional
story. I say to Bob: at noon I bought a carton of milk and at six oclock I
bought another carton of milk. Half of milk I drank. How much milk is left?
Bob answers: one package. That is, Bob knows that I still have one carton of
milk. But his knowledge is based on trust to me. And in vain: I did not buy
milk. He: and basis of faith is knowledge. If Bob have analyzed your previous
statements, found that 80% of them are false, it is unlikely he believe it. Me:
O.K. What faith the Bob gets from this knowledge? That I am a liar. But it is
not the faith, but, again the knowledge. Therefore, the knowledge is not basis
of faith. And what is basis of Bobs knowledge? The faith, that exists absolute
truth: therefore 80% of mine sentences can be regarded as false.
Many believe that the world and our life with suering and joy does not exist,
i.e. it is an illusion. Yes, the same Dr. Leonard Suskind (one of the architects
of disproved string hypothesis) has created a scientic theory the world is
an illusion, a hologram. Therefore, the Bobs analysis of my statements does
not exist, because there are no statements in reality. Such a strange belief. So
all our knowledge is either the illusion and we know nothing, or we will pray,
trust, drink and eat the Jesus Christ, whose powers keep us from described
insanity.
V.K.: most interesting thing, that people, who are rejecting the General
Relativity... Me:... long rejected it. I have information in the form of peer-
reviewed articles (not mine) that General Relativity as any theory has a range
53
of application. It means, that the General Relativity is not perfectly accurate.
This is regions of singularities (e.g., Seemingly Big Bang) and the eld around
a particle with non-zero spin. They say, that General Relativity is not s.c. nal
knowledge, i.e. not the Truth; and again the theorists fumble in the dark. But I
defend the verity of General Relativity, expressing my faith in it [10]. Moreover,
spin-particle case does not demand a departure from General Relativity (2014-
Wikipedia: Belinfante-Rosenfeld stress-energy tensor).
Verity of arithmetics.
Brian in [8] page 67 argues, that arithmetics of large numbers can not be per-
formed using school tokens, thus mathematics is the rules of our imagination,
which may not correspond to outside reality. It is his faith. But I believe, that
the truth exists, what the God has made human to study the correct outside
world. Below I will prove, that Brian is wrong. If you are sure, that the truth
exists, I can then convince You. Otherwise the Magister Sci. can not ever bit
the Doctor Sci.!
1) Commutativity. Let there in space God made the n horizontal lines and
let on them be the k vertical lines. The number of intersections is nk. Now
God would made k horizontal lines and draws on them the n vertical lines. The
number of intersections is k n. Does holds nk = k n or not? Yes, because God
Jesus shall not make another grid, but simply turn His head horizontally. Then
the vertical lines become horizontal and vice versa. And according to Einsteins
Relativity, the physics (structure) of grid will not change.
2) A natural number of length u 1 is
N =
u

k=0
n
k
10
k
,
where n
k
= 0, 1, 2, ..., 9. Another number is M =

m
k
10
k
. The sum N +M =

(m
k
+n
k
) 10
k
. Can occur that the m
k
+n
k
= 10 +s
k
, where s
k
= 0, 1, 2, ..., 9.
Then, there be 10 x 10
k
= 10
k+1
thus, nothing will be lost. Please, prove, that
if N = M, then all m
k
= n
k
. I think, one can prove that, taking the fact, what
single act of counting lasts one second. While counting the n
1
must change 10
times, until changes once the n
2
, which must change 10 times, to once change
the n
3
and so on. Therefore, if the couter state is not identical, then the counting
54
time is dierent. Therefore, the things N and M are dierent.
The world of Sniper.
He : he is not just a marksman, who believes in victory; he is also an individual,
who has knowledge how to do his job. Without faith in victory he is just a
killer. Without knowledge he is cannon meat for the enemy. Me: The
headquarters will change and scientist would criticize, retrain sniper. Then
last should rmly believe in the correctness of his knowledge and spit on the
weisenheimers. Then the KNOWLEDGE of sniper turns into an explicit faith,
what it is and always have been.
Here is the temptation of Jesus Christ in the desert, what has saved him
from suicide: knowledge or faith? Such trinity must be in a person: Faith,
Hope and Love. Where is the knowledge here?! The pilot ies on instruments
in the clouds or night, if he lost faith in them he dies. Sometimes instead
of the word knowledge consider to use the word ability. Sniper can kill
enemies and hide from them. He: Knowledge of sniper is true, because he
knows how to protect himself from the enemy, using animal instincts. And no,
it is not the faith. Me: Knowledge of how to act in this situation turns to faith,
if suddenly thought comes, that the enemy can use the atomic bomb. Becomes
the faith, that the enemy will not do so. You can argue with me thats
understandable. I do not repeat the basics of Logic every morning I wake. But
Aristotle is acknowledged father of logic. He teaches, that all knowledge is
based on faith, on the defaults. Sniper default hopes and believes that suddenly
demented, he does not shoot himself from his own rie. At least subconsciously
believes it. He: You are joker, Dmitri. Me: The best comedian is someone,
who says in all seriousness. Like me. I am saving people (with the help of God),
while they have not become atheists.
Many quark collision.
Consider the material arXiv:1212.1701, arXiv:1309.4235,
http://elementy.ru/news/432089. I believe, that in a ying proton are only 3
quarks. So, only 6 quarks collide, while the pair of protons collision inside the
LHCollider. How they can reconstruct the collision scene, if there hundreds of
quark are in only two protons collision? Absurd. Thus, I believe, the theo-
55
reticians made mistake, saying, that in ying proton are more than 3 quarks.
Indeed, if I put 3 quarks on the ground and run from them, will I see hundreds
of quarks? It is not the spirit of Relativity. If 3 = 100 is really the case, then
the quarks can not exist. Same day the 6 cars collided on the road to my town,
at one place and time. This is clear evidence, that probably demons overheard
me and the descriptive demonstration staged.
A knowledge as temporary agreement
Now all know, that Pluto is not a planet. That means, when near Pluto is lot
of similar bodies, it is not a planet; and if would be none, then the Pluto is the
planet. This type of knowledge is very similar to an articial faith, so it is.
Good science vs bad one.
Everyone is free to believe as he wants and to unite with co-believers. There is
Christs community, that believes the Orthodox Symbol of Faith. Faith with-
out doubt is knowledge and vice versa. Think about the situation in Matthew
4, which one would have prevented us from the fall: faith or knowledge? But
do not raise my idea in the absolute. Perhaps it is not correct or does not
work for all occasions. The knowledge can be true or false. Prior to Einstein,
everyone knew that the time is absolute. But it was a false knowledge. After
Einstein everyone knows that the passage of time is relative. And this knowl-
edge is true. I call upon scientists to hoard true knowledge rather than doubt.
Wikipedia: Knowledge is... that is extracted from the experience. My expe-
rience is reading the Bible. Wikipedia: Faith is... trust. I trust the Bible.
Hence, knowledge and faith are one and the same in essence. I will go to heaven,
if I fence this knowledge, defend it from attacks of satanic doubts and people
(cf. Matthew 14:31), and act accordingly. Otherwise it would not be knowl-
edge. Knowledge of atheist is a false belief. The belief, that the world is real,
is not faith-less knowledge but the Orthodox Faith: science do honor also the
Matrix (check the lm). VK: Dmitry, science never claims that is not known
science is not a religion! Me: you do not like religion life? Pass by! Science
is faith confession. MK: faith is not science. Me: then science is also not love,
and not hope. That is evil hopelessness. But the science, I have, is both the
rst and the second and the third.
56
H.D.: You cant observe Napoleon yet it is a fact he existed. Me: You trust
these historians? You trust Your eyes, ears and brain activity? It is also faith,
man! So strong, that it can be called knowledge. Not any knowledge is true.
I know that you are by the passport: Anna S. How do I know? It is faith, a
very strong faith. Care to check? If you would allow and I will come to you:
Show your passport!. Please. I will say: fake! I do not believe it! We
go to check your identity at police. I will say: You bribed the police, I do
not believe it! Therefore, if someone does not want to believe in God, how to
prove God? And this proves that any knowledge is faith. Believe me, that it is
proven, then for you is also proven.
She: Faith and Knowledge in essence are contradictory things. He: name
me one your personal knowledge, in which you personally do not believe? She:
I have before me a glass of milk. I know its milk, if I milked the cow itself
and lled a glass with liquid from the cow. I need not to believe that this
milk. Me: If you only knew, how often batty Victor milks non-existent cows
and drinks non-existent milk! Or eats the Sun! What is the guarantee, that
in one moment you have not lost the mind and see in front the glass and
remember that you milked the cow? There are chances that waked up, you
gone crazy. Therefore, all knowledge is in fact faith confession. It is therefore
necessary to protect own knowledges.
Take the Orthodox Holy Sacrament: we see and feel the bread and
wine, but in fact it is a hallucination. Recall Miracle of Lanciano (check the
Wikipedia).
All our exists thanks to God. So, not knowing God, you do not know all
ours. All knowledge is based on knowledge of God. And this we call faith,
very strong faith. Here you see before you a pencil and you wonder, where its
material originated from. If you have no answer, then there is no pencil it is a
hallucination. Here people yearn through the CERN Colliders to the beginning
of the universe, in the Beginning (Alpha) are the answers.
I submitted a paper to Physical Review Simplest and natural Time Ma-
chine. Referee rejected it with such brief reasoning: I do not believe.
Therefore, any knowledge is faith.
57
16 One can be proving God
Martyrs and torturers of the rst centuries. Torturers have seen clear miracles
of God, but lied, that it all was witchcraft. All was proved to them and they
are without excuse on Gods Judgment Day. They have sinned against the Holy
Spirit. Read Acts 1:3, Jeremiah 5:12.
But we can prove God and proving. The cosmological argument is not an
argument, but the prove, one of many proves. My own prove the God exists
at least at level of printed word. Many writers feel, that their heroes are living
their own life. If God is dead, then why such many evil comments here? The
atheism is evil. I wonder, has the YouTube limit on the number of comments?
Atheist: why follow a nonsense book. Me: The following makes sense: in
the book is promised afterlife. The book, that promises afterlife could be taken
seriously, because the thing that anybody wants is afterlife. Atheist: I give you
afterlife for 10% of your income. Me: another Savior... go away, antichrist!
Proof of next life: Lady Di, Michael Jackson, Jack from Titanic and Elvis
Presley live! Ask the fans. They are LIFE in their hearts: Every night in my
dreams I see you, I feel you. That is how I know you go on. Far across the
distance And spaces between us You have come to show you go on... You open
the door And youre here in my heart And my heart will go on and on... Well
stay Forever this way You are safe in my heart And my heart will go on and
on. Watch proofs on mine YouTube channel. J.S.: LOL. Thats not proof...
famous people are no more alive. Me: Why, oh, why You need to laugh out
loud? In Your struggle for truth You are destroying the good feelings. Thus
this is certainly not the Truth You struggle for - it is satanic lie. If You are
too weak in Holy Spirit, then Let them think, that Lady Di is alive and may
be watching us from Heaven. Listen to the song Candle in the wind and cry,
cry man, cry, cry out loud! COL. After such cruel Lady Di is dead, but the
memory of her continues the I am not destroying the good feelings is the
self-hypnosis. Mother, who lost her child is feeling hope, that child is in Heaven.
Then smarty John comes and whispers: You are silly bitch, because You are
animal, and Your dead meat is Your child. The meat, that You still remember,
58
but soon is wisy to forget. This is exactly, what You do on YouTube: satanic
destruction of good feelings. The evil truth is lie. Repent.
Looking at fossils one concludes: Creationism is right. Thus, the opposite
conclusion (macro-evolution) is faith. Facts are hard to ignore, but faith in
eternal death is very easily to ignore. Therefore this video prevents innocent
people become atheists - ultimate criminals against rst commandment. He:
World oldest pottery conrmed to be 20,000 years old
http://www.bu.edu/bostonia/web/prehistoric-pottery/. Me: shall we believe
You and them? If Yes, then Darwinism is matter of faith, trust.
He: God is not observable in a way the scientic method describes... im not
saying the scientic method is above the Bible, it is something created by
fallible humans. Me: Like the Higgs Boson is not directly observable: they see
only its manifestations. He: However the rst 7 days of this earths history are
nished, and will not come back again. Thus, we cannot observe them. Me:
Please see video Intelligent Design: Waking Up To Creation on YouTube. All
is very observable by spiritual vision.
This can be modied into cyclic logic: God wrote Bible, because Bible
tells so. This logic perfectly works: God is the Spirit. The Spirit spokes in
Bible through the hands of holy writers. He: the conclusion must already be
accepted for the premise to be valid. Me: The thing is valid not because You
accept it. The Hitler rejected the humaneness, but humaneness is from God
(thus, is valid). I may call the cyclic logic as cyclic description, beautiful
cyclic picture of thoughts instead, is it more suitable? Take the Chernobyl
nuclear meltdown. Because the clicks of a Geiger counter exist, the deadly
radiation exists. Because radiation exists, there is Geiger activity. It is very
healthy, practical conclusions, which may not t in the Aristotles laws of logic.
It is circular. He: they are not mutually dependent! Me: but save your butt
from radioactive contamination.
Drak.: impossible - to prove non-existence. Me: not evident claim. For
example, one receives a closed box and can easily prove, that inside is no tiger.
God is much more noticeable, than tiger. Indeed, ask Your professor: why
Hawking radiation does not come from walls of our box? Why a black hole
59
evaporates due to antiparticles in vacuum uctuations, but an electron in CERN
stays there? It is Orthodox Gods Will. Take a matchbox. Orthodox God is
everywhere. Thus, He is inside this matchbox. Thus, one could very easily
prove, that there is no God. Why You still can not? It is impossible to prove
non-existence of God, because God exists. Drak.: I have a magic invisible pink
dragon in my garage who breathes re and reads Shakespeare. Can you prove it
doesnt exist? Me: Open Your life and garage for someone, then he could learn
Your inner World. But I can talk to the Orthodox God inside our matchbox.
Perhaps He tells me some of Your secrets. Be silly in eyes of this fallen World:
every day talk to Orthodox God inside matchbox, He might answer and You
will got Your prove. Not any god, but Orthodox God is everywhere. Thus,
He is inside our matchbox. We got Him! But He is not piss artist. We do
not see radio waves, and think that they are not, because they do not prevent
us to sin. Same case is with God: you need a receiver, the receiver of grace.
Who sins, he does not accept the grace of God, and does not detect Him. Drak:
Right, when confronted with logic, a bible thumper turns to preaching mode
and starts spewing nonsense... Typical. Me: The teaching of General Relativity
also makes no sense for a brain, which does not opened his potentials, like the
one year old child. Jaw.: So because you dont understand extremely advanced
physics, it must be wrong? Me: What must be wrong? General Relativity is
true, I am convinced. Is it wrong not to study General Relativity? Orthodox
God wants us to be developing, but we have limited time before pass over.
In this school-class (current life on Earth), we must prepare our eternal soul for
the Judgement Day.
He: does Batman exists? Me: Yes, on some level (ask the dedicated writers).
Thanks for interest in word God. One can not wipe it out from encyclopedias
and minds of people: word God is truly immortal. This word was always
there: serious studies show, that the Earth never was atheistic, neither it is now.
Repent: if You accept and will preach the fact God is word in encyclopedias,
then You will have less strong torture in Fire Lake. P.W.: Evolution has been
observed. Do your research. Me: You mean as words macro evolution? One
observes such words in dictionary. But have they true meaning? They have not,
60
it is printed lie. d.: can anyone see if GOD indeed wrote the bible? Me: there
are no mistakes, even no grammar mistakes. The text is huge. The Orthodox
God does not make mistakes. Absolutely nobody has found a single mistake.
Having DNA found on crime scene one gets information about suspect. Thus,
one extracts useful information from DNA. Logically, it contains information.
Information has the source - the Creator. freeloadx3: Ok so tell us how this
intelligent mind created every thing ? Me: It is easy, all provides information,
thus, all is information. You can not show a thing, without transferring infor-
mation. To create information is easy, just say a Word. Indeed, the word Uni-
Verse is probably one verse of the Bible, namely Genesis 1:1. All Orthodox
God was willing to do, is to say: let there be light (cf Genesis 1)! Winged-
Wyrm: No, we extract the shape and positioning of the DNA molecules. We
extrapolate that to information about who was at the scene. Me: If someone
asks You: I derive my own theory: the Combinatorial Statistics, I need infor-
mation about those combinations in DNAs. Please provide me full information
about shape and positioning of the DNA molecules. Thus, You give him
INFORMATION, which directly You have recorded while peering the DNAs.
WingedWyrm: By that denition, the shape of a rock is information. Me: Yes,
brother! Have seen the serial Third Rock from the Sun? The Scientists are
interested in exact information about shape and inner structure of the Earth,
that Third Rock. WingedWyrm: Then, weve eectively dened informa-
tion in such a way that the addition of more is not extraordinary. Therefore,
the incredulity that it could be added by mutation cannot be evidence against
it. Me: the seed of tree is like a Creators compact log, the recorded recipe of
how the Earth shall be used to get the grown tree. The radiation has damaged
a seed, thus a part of information (of how to get Gods designed construction)
was lost. Thus, we get the sick tree, a genetic cripple mutant.
Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinows Inadvertent Proof for God
http://www.strangenotions.com/hawking-proof-for-god/. The PhD Hugh Ross
wrote REASONS TO BELIEVE. Dr Jason Lisle presented: Ultimate Proof
for Creation.
61
17 The Orthodox Faith is the true religion
Safety EXIT is made obvious for every passenger, regardless the IQ. Which
feeders have name True Faith? It is the Orthodoxy in languages I know,
including the original language. The Holy Fire illuminates the more precise
choice. Simply accept dogmas of that Church, which receives the Holy Fire. It
is the rotating beacon with period of exactly one year.
The Verity of given situation can not change, because it is the Truth. The
Orthodox faith is, as the name says, the True Faith. Thus it is the same through
all space and time. The Adam in Eeden has True Faith. Thus, our forefather
was Orthodox. The Orthodox Christians are the True Body of Christ on Earth.
The real ght is against Him, the war against alternative christianity is like
the battle of Don Quixote. According to the Savior, Orthodox Christianity is
the narrow door. On the cemeteries the godless, non-Orthodox graves are the
majority. So atheism and heresy is a wide door. The number of ways to get
an arrow into the bullseye is very small. Read 2 Timothy 2:5.
All people are born with faith in God - it is natural. A criminal has done huge
work and eorts to wipe the God from own heart. Thus, conversion from atheist
to theist is not something heroic. Namely to recognize in humble Jesus Christ
the Orthodox God is act of bravery, which will be rewarded. Lack of faith has in
itself no justication, because faith in God is embedded in the individual (Mar-
tyr Daniil Sysoev http://blogs.mail.ru/mail/tajnaa/657BCD1A5554D92A.html).
Ancient Greek thinker Plato acquired such basic knowledge: all people have in-
nate concept of God (Zitija Svjatqh, june 1). Dear (wo)man with false name,
there is tribe(s) in South America, to which can not be preached Gospel by
missionaries in ash. Only by Orthodox Angels (cf St. Theophan the Recluse,
Pskovo-Pechorski listok 644). Even Mowgli will do his choice: hell or Heaven.
Jesus Christ has freed Eve (cf Saint Seraphim of Sarov). You, jamgrl, would
have no voice and not right to loud fart in other faith society.
The baby, who can not tell and remember for long to tell, sees the invisible
angel next to the praying Orthodox Priest. There is high-tech device, which
tells where the baby directs the look. http://youtu.be/3J6nq6IBfxo?t=11m2s
62
Our Priest (8th century, Lanciano town) was in doubt about the Body and
Blood of the Lords Supper. And the Lord showed miracle: cleaned the hallu-
cination of bread and wine. Travel to Lanciano! Scientists go there: research
is blessed in the 1870s. Body is part of His heart, His blood is suitable for
transfusion (4th group (AB)). Blood has clotted in ve balls, each weighing as
much as 5 all together! Read: [1].
18 Me on Black Holes
For a long time, the Religion and any science were not separated. Were saying,
that Physics does not make sense, if not conduces to revelation of the Cre-
ator. Is not possible to cover purely rational the nature of black holes, and the
Jesus. After all, here and there the physical laws waltz with lyrics. Indeed,
on the surface there are the so-called singular eects [15]: excessive (breaking
all senses) energy, strength, and even volume occupied by the emerging black
hole (according to my unappreciated calculations) unlimited by theory. Black
holes are just there, as there are snowakes, bubbles and a bumblebee ying
contrary to the laws of modern aerodynamics. They understood how dragony
ies http://elvisti.com/node/8966, but bumblebee was ignored. I saw a drag-
ony. Huge wings. Is it the most complicated case? The bumblebee has large
body and wings are relatively small. Scientists have shown that dragony can
y. But bumblebee they have not modeled. Strange, so there is still the wonder
of the bumblebee: missionaries bring it out as an example of Gods miracle
and failer of atheistic science. One can begin to love and admire: to pro-
tect the living and inanimate nature, because it is the Second Book in which
the Holy Trinity reveals Himself through parables. You become attached, and
do sympathize while reading books of Creator. As Bastian in the movie The
Neverending Story you become the part of story the endless story; reading
others and developing with your good ideas the textbooks. Fly on fairy wings
to a neutron star. The ultraboundary star.
Suppose a physicist after death, rather than to gad for three days on the
Earth, went into the emerging black hole at the center of our Galaxy. Due to
63
time dilation, while he will fall into the hole, the Lord comes the second time,
and draws him on the Day of Judgement. Waiting may be not more than three
days. This can be proved rigorously. If the faller has penetrated into the
black hole (i.e., below the event horizon), then coordinate connection with
the outside world will break [15] and will form a parallel to Earth the new
universe. Parallel Universes are banned by my argument in Section 9.1. So, be
sure, the angels will pick up the soul to Court before it will disappear into a
black hole. Drawing upon information from the Bible, is solved the Einsteins
puzzlling as to what the time is real for faller t
F
< , however never realizable
from the perspective of an observer on Earth t
E
= . According to the Bible
both the times are nite, the latter is limited by Judgment Day: t
E
t
J
.
19 Evolution into nonsense
Why oldyoung Earth ght? The point is elsewhere: the Creation Scientists
hate the idea, that death brought men into the world. God says, that man
brought death into the world.
A.S.: evolution would never be as quick as making a sh a reptile. Me: I
disagree. Take the search for protons decay. Waiting until a proton would
decay can take more than 10
30
years. But observing group of 10
30
protons
during only one year would get you the Nobel Prize. Therefore, if there is a
slightest chance, that ever the transition happens, then in group of enough sh
mass will be born an eagle. During only some year.
She: you dont need faith to believe in evolution, you need a brain. He:
We have never seen one type of animal slowly changing into another (without
the articial assistance from a scientist). Therefore all the evidence points to
generic stability even in the face of environmental instability. Me: She must
be hale, to agree to your proof. You can not cure her. The cure is True God,
whom she rejects. The miracles are needed. Pray, that she would walk on water
or something.
News. March 21, 2012, at the A.N.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evo-
lution, Academy of Sciences... Overall opinion the question of the initial
64
appearance of man on Earth is dark enough. And in this connection it is im-
possible to dismiss even such exotic version, as the appearance of man on Earth
from space... descendants of the ancient cosmonauts, astronauts, aliens. Or
gods as who how likes. Me: nightmare! Has not God made foolish the
wisdom of the world? (1 Corinthians 1:20 NIV). After all, when it turned out,
that people are not monkeys, why not honor the Biblical Word? Why so hate
Jesus Christ and Mother of God, that to assume the doggy-sexposition before
the alien?
Suppose you got cancer. The Jesus goes down the Street You live. Will You
run to Him? Yes. So you believe in supernatural wonder. The evolution has no
true wonders. But after then, You will try to tempt the Jesus down or crucify
Him, if You are the satans servant.
OptiBee12: On the ip side, there is evidence to support the big bang the-
ory and evolution. Me: Dear (wo)man. The Young Earth Creationists are in
fact totally on this ip side, namely they KNOW the big bang and evolu-
tion. Namely there are VIRTUAL Big Bang and MICRO evolution. Thus,
Creationists can describe more of reality, than Your vague words do. Yes, I
believe in evolution with its TRUE meanings. It is my strongest faith. How
else? There is spiritual evolution: according to Orthodox Faith the Son of God
has become Man, for us to become Gods. It is everyones task and purpose
in life to become God by the grace. That is, what I call macro evolution!
65
Man, learn to read between lines: you <IF YOU NOT GOD> cant make
something out of nothing. Indeed, even a fairytale is composed of preexisted
words. But come together, the words create never existed before meaning (like
a river springs out from brooks). Thus, even we can create something totally
new. Why? Are we like God?
So You ask for proof, like all they do. Me as God by grace could only
be proved after Judgement Day: please read Revelation 20:12, if Your small,
innitely logical world is indeed open to any information. Stop calling Evolu-
tion without specication: 1) a historically - Darwinian E.; 2) Spiritual E. -
Orthodox men become Gods by grace; 3) micro E. - such term is in arXiv.
The Darwinian Evolution relies on Oort cloud as source of short living comets.
Here cloud is disproved: Raymond A. Lyttleton, The non-existence of the Oort
cometary shell, Astrophysics and Space Science, vol 31, december 1974,385-401.
Thus, make the most important logical conclusion in Your life till now: the Dar-
winian Evolution is wrong, because in peer-reviewed paper the Evolutions Oort
cloud is disproved. This cloud was last fortress of Darwinian Evolution. And
it fell by attack of the God in men. He: Again, how does that disprove the
various dating methods used to age the earth? Me: Thus, the Darwinism is
based also on ignoring. You simply ignore a part of peer-reviewed papers. Just
like the Creation Scientists do. Thus, the teachings are both the faiths, which
one chooses from and strongly defends. He: how it disproves every other dating
technique that doesnt rely on comets. Me: The Creation Scientists have seri-
ous arguments against the datings also. Not any man is retarded in mind.
Thus, there is objective reasons, why there is Creationism. What creationists
ignore? Many things on UFOs. It is simply not healthy. Creation Scientists
ignore dendrochronology, believing, that it is farfetched. He: it seems to be
more saying We dont actually have evidence for the Oort cloud. Me: Your
brain is severely damaged by atheism, repent and read the scientic conclusion
in abstract (which has survived the severe peer-review): the alleged shell of
comets is non-existent. What do You prefer: feel to be right and soulless
robot, or be humble follower of Jesus Christ? He: I want to understand how
the world around me works... I nd that far more fullling than closing my
66
eyes and ignoring evidence. Me: closing my eyes I bet, You have dreams
full of wonders; this is the resting from the cold logical-ness of Darwinism. He:
Whats wrong with logic? Me: Mister Spock from Star Track never laughs
and if smiles then very thinkfully: he is vulcanian.
Human: I wonder why only some apes evolved into humans? Me: (wo)man,
please draw the obvious conclusion! Very, very wise observation, dear brother/sis
in Adam!
To an atheist: Can I call you brother? Yes, if we have common relatives.
Darwinian evolution does not provide such links: what if you have originated
from dierent ape, or dierent amoeba in the prehistoric broth? The Ortho-
dox Christians do not make your life more miserable, as it is now. So, please
do not crucify us, and do not try to save us.
EASTYJAZ34: Creation is not a scientically proven theory. Me: Dear
(wo)man, if a thing can be truly called theory, then it is truly proven hy-
pothesis. Thus, any theory is proven. Therefore, calling Creation a theory, You
admit, deep in Your heart, that Creationism is right. Fight for Creationism,
defend it from satans demons, which whisper to people the deadly lies.
Bocaj130: A change of kind doesnt mean anything. What does he really
want? A change of species? Of genus? Of family, order, class, phylum, kingdom
or domain? If he wants to dispute science then he aught to know something
about it rst... Me: You just protecting the face of experts in this lm
http://youtu.be/U0u3-2CGOMQ. Why they can not protect themselves? To
call a police at least, if there are no words. bobbbbEE: Dene a kind. What
makes a kind exactly? Me: There are two kinds of beings: ones, which y
and ones, which not (however can jump). There is one animal, which belongs
to both these kinds, he is one of the kind. And again, we can separate
swimming beings in two kinds: ones with lungs and ones with gills. One can
separate beings in three kinds: 1) ones, which are holy humans; 2) humans,
which actually pleasure satan (like atheists and anti-theists), and 3) ones which
are Orthodox-Gods beautiful, sinless animals.
Darwin have put into the believers soul the doubts. But in his book gave
way out of them: to dig the earth and not nd transitional forms, not to nd
67
common relatives between ea and blue whale. Doubts dispelled: the common
sense (holy sense) and excavations have refuted such relatives.
Evolutionist: Can you use a theory in practical things if it is not true?.
Me: They do that very easy. The Newton Gravity considers Gravitys Force
Field, but Einstein have found, that there is free motion in curved space-time,
and not a force eld of Gravity.
He: No one here was going to disprove the Bible. Me: And there is nothing
scary for Bible: Jesus Christ is Truth. Lie is doomed. The Wikipedia implies
that selection of (allegedly yearly) tree rings denies the appearance of life in the
year 5508 B.C. This is humiliation of Gods omnipotence by satanic macroevo-
lution. This is essentially a lie of scientists like Druids, and unmasked in
http://creationwiki.org/Dendrochronology.
On your problem: A life from lifeless matter. You say, that snowakes are
self-organized in comparison with liquid water. On entropy read me in viXra.
But without an observer, a man, who will see it and identify? Organization
of snowakes occurred primarily in humans inside, in the sense of beauty.
Therefore snowakes are not organized by themselves. They purchased the
beauty in the heart (core) of human observer. Universe without a living
observer does not exist a single second. Observer Holy Trinity am always.
A monkey and a man both have two legs, two arms, one head, one stomach,
one spine, etc... Thus, their DNA is not much dierent. Therefore, any peer-
reviewed paper, claiming, that 98 percent of similarity is prove of Darwinian
Evolution, is wrong.
Neanderthals are our relatives (http://zaberaj.ru). Articial intellect will
never catch humans one (http://my.mail.ru). The Earth has slowed rota-
tion during couple years, how then it behaved darwinistically during 4.5 billion
years? (http://news.mail.ru/society/7793390/?frommail=1). There are calcu-
lations, that the Moon moves away from Earth 4 sm/year, and the Earth moves
away from Sun 15 sm/year [2]. Then the Moon would be so close to Earth (cou-
ple billion years ago), that due to gigantic tides the life would be impossible.
The Armstrong saw, that Moon is not darwinistically dusty. The Darwinists
envented ad hoc hypothesises: the emerging craters prevent dustication of
68
the Moon. Read the Moon dust in CreationWiki.
Atheist: The idea of morality is not made any less valuable by the fact that it
didnt come from a god. Me: from where then? The prehistoric soup/bouillon?
Atheist: From us. Not the prehistoric soup/bouillon. Where on earth have
you gotten that? He: Only Dmitri could have thought of that prehistoric
soup/bouillon hahahahahahahaha Priceless! Me: morality is from us, we
are from prehistoric soup/bouillon. Thus, morality is from prehistoric
soup/bouillon. Repent!
20 Holy Icons
Came the Good News, that the Heavenly is materialized: the Jesus Christ
became incarnated in the Virgin Mary. Due this we became so close to God!
He is closer to us, than our skin. And all for Love, neverseen before the Love!
Love, that resurrects the dead: Christ is Risen!
Joy of the veneration of icons in the... We have heard Him with our ears,
seen with our eyes, our hands touched Him (cf. 1 John 1:1)... aspiration for
holiness in concrete, tangible way, greed for it, and we love to touch it, kiss
it, wearing it on our chest, to sanctify our homes through it. The iconoclasts
wanted to deprive us of this shrine... Look how cold and discarnate is the belief
of confessions, which deny icons. Explicitly denying icons, they unconsciously
deny incarnation... Their Eucharist itself... becomes discarnate and minor...
The Flesh, communion with which gives eternal life, have turned by them into
words and reasoning. (Priest Alexander Elchaninov, Pravoslavie dlja Mnogih,
2006).
Godman Jesus Christ Himself produced icons for us. Do not believe me? But
the Turin Shroud? And the Cross? The Edicule? And even Jerusalem itself?
And the Image of Edessa? The prints of his holy feet? The Scripture is Holy
Tradition written. Not all, that Holy Tradition gives us, is written down: Read
John 21:25. Believe in the Holy Trinity, that all will honor the Son (cf. John
5:23). How to honor the Son? To honor, as ones honor the Father (cf. John
5:23). I believe that God has gloried His martyrs, because in place of their
69
burial was erected the Botanical Garden of Tartu. I perceive the sculptures of
people in the garden as icons, read my article: Drevnyaya byl nashikh mest,
26.01.2011, International Newspaper Valk http://walk.ee/.
21 Problem of two parallels intersection
From [8] I learned, that it is open question even in year 2007. On the straight
long road look along it. You see, how the road borders tend to merge in po-
tential innity. Suppose Universe is innite (most popular at Friedmann
model) then, in our eye the images of parallel tracks will in fact merge, because
in physical nature the two innitely close points are actually one point. But
that would mean, that parallels locally merge in innity. But the parallels are
dened as when the distance between lines is constant along the tracks (even
in curved space). Therefore they can not locally merge, even in innity. Thus,
the premise, that Universe is innite, is not true.
What are parallels? Take a long rigid straight pipe. The two opposite sides
of this pipe are parallel lines A and B, which have the same local distance from
each other: the diameter of the pipe.
Shoot a bullet into the cosmos. The two opposite sides of this bullet are points
A and B. The parallel wordlines A and B do not intersect in any spacetime,
however their projection on (coordinate planes) may have intersections.
Therefore, any parallel couples: universes, kinds of lifeforms, human souls,
do not come together. Even in extreme cases, like some billions virtual years of
false evolution. Even if You have billions of dollars, but an ice-cold wife. The
strange visitors like UFO-s and Bigfoots come not from the parallel worlds, but
they come in spiritual evil sense.
22 On logic and omniscience
Human logic: the same thing can not be both true and untrue (in the same
respect). But there is uncertainty principle with the wave-particle dualism.
But even simpler: 1) here is a criminal in prison, who is sitting and standing
70
at the washstand. I did not say: sitting and not sitting, because it would
not be logical; and I did not say, that the criminal stands and not stands. Is
written, that he stands and sits: one does not nullify the other. 2) Yes, married
bachelor exists: in a fairytale; as the movie; in a sick mind; as combination of
two words; bachelor could have dream, in which he is married; etc. 3) While
driving in city-bus to radio studio, we simultaneously can be moving away (the
radio signal fades a bit) and approaching the station (number of bus-stops is
getting smaller). 4) Is it possible to turn on the crossroad, same time, to the left
and to the right? You can, but dissected through samurai sword and dragged in
dierent directions. And can even alive, just sign a power of attorney and give
it to friend, who turns to the left, and you go to the right. Indeed, as stated in
the Monte Cristo: you know that is a signature? It is a continuation of your
hand. 5) What can be simultaneously the same and the other? Answer: a copy.
6) According to the Theory of Relativity river is moving and not moving, all
in silver moonlight (Russian song). But here in regard of sherman the water
ows, but relative to maple leaf on water, the latter has standstill. Thus, in
dierent relations situation can be dierent. For Americans now night, but
day for Estonians. So relatively to Estonians is day, and relatively to Americans
is not day. I thought: in regard of me, I have free will in the world; and in
respect of God there is no freedom of the will in the world. But even here there
are interesting exceptions. Very rarely, in the most exceptional circumstances,
the God changes His Omniscience and launches unpredictable (even for Him)
course of events. I believe so. And then we can surprise God. Here He asked
the mother, can He take her sick child to Heaven, because otherwise the child
would become a killer. Just the time will be abolished, we will surprise the God
(in a good way), but here now the Creator wants to be knowledgeable about
everything in advance because we do sin, do violate all that is holy. I just
now thought.
Vladik: Freedom is the ability to change the future in our sole discretion. It
is incompatible with the fact, that someone knew (without asking you), that
you will be doing. Me: Only A Sith Deals In Absolutes (from movie). Would
you like to get free, when Lifeguard pulls you by the hand from the infernal
71
abyss? Free, but dead! Theomachy always comes down to one thing: suicide.
One way or another. Let there be no more suicides! Wake up, Vladik, your
dissatisfaction with life destructs the people! I like living and call for your still
small voice to get out of your head all these thoughts of violence against body
and psyche!
23 Law of conservation
He: the law of conservation... I would call it a law, that miracles are impossible;
and prefer to believe in it. Me: Read Rev. 3:20. You have not opened for Him
the door to your cage. That is why all remains in your cage, all conserves
there: all the feces, all stale air can not go anywhere. In a closed system the
(thermal) death is waiting you. Repent!
Proof of the reality of miracles. God is the person, so it is unethical to make
tests on Him without His consent. Another thing are the thought experiments,
but so, that it does not come under the criminal article perk thinking of God.
So I asked a blessing from Jesus Christ on the thought experiment. Holy Martyr
Conon (memory on fth of March) got rid of the evil spirits, driving them by
force of Christs Cross into jars and sealing the exits. What if persuade God to
get into the bottle and solder the neck? Put the bottle with God on the scales.
You get weight of bottle only, because God is the Spirit. But here He showed
Himself, created the wine-miracle in the bottle. Scales showed an increase in
mass. Shall situation be not in conict with the law of conservation, which we
like. Then do the following conclusion. Our system bottle + God is not a
closed system, in spite of the sealed neck. After all, conservation law is
written only for a closed system. In an open system is the law of continuity
: the dierence between the in-comed and out-comed energy equals to the
increase of energy of an open system. How can a sealed bottle with God within
be open? Answer: the God is omnipresent. He is out of the bottle. Miracle.
So what says the law of continuity? Elementary: wine miraculously appeared
in the bottle, hence the weight of the bottle increased. Law of continuity is
not broken. So, dear M., the Founder of Life exists and loves you and works
72
miracles. We give Him be Himself in our hearts and minds, let sing You are the
God, so make the wonders. He: I was taught that God is omnipresent. And
if this is true, then how could it be that at the beginning of your experiment,
He was not in the bottle? Is He pumped from there or what? Me: And God
says to me: Ps. 13:1. But you are just in the condition described in the Bible.
However, you will come to the fact that the Existent (as one of Gods names)
exists. This is elementary. So I proceeded from the fact, that God is not in the
bottle, but came to realize that He is omnipresent. Miracle. Like a miracle,
when a caterpillar becomes a buttery.
According to my not appreciated calculations, some comets (the Comas, the
Faye http://citadel.pioner-samara.ru/distance/1969come.htm) appeared in the
material world after 5508 B.C. Perhaps God drew them from the Heavens (there
is treasures of hail and snow). And maybe made out of nothing as bread was
multiplied. You say that He did not made bread from nothing, but from the
bread of boy. But in our material world is the energy conservation law. Calories
in boys bread are less than in the remained baskets. So it is great miracle,
when He created additional energy. Previously, it was not. It emerged from
nothingness.
24 Talking to people
S.P.: Just one question what is God? Me: not what, but Who, which
is with a capital W: please do not fall into satanic Humanism! You even in
this question were not able to break from the clutches of materialism. Read
Exodus 3:13-15.
spiritual evolution
S.K.: how he did it and why he did it (the World)? you do not know a thing
about him. Me: If specialist would like to explain how works the PC (com-
puter) to me, he must prepare me. I am physical and mental cripple. Increase
my ability to memories, analyze, heal my myopia, decrease my laziness and
inattention. It is truly macro evolution! I must go through spiritual evolution,
in order to know God. The ash and blood of Godman (Jesus) being taken in
73
due course inside the Orthodox Church, will make of me (if Godman wants)
the God as well. I have own book already.
Circle of life
The buttery produces young Caterpillar, grown Caterpillar produces second
buttery, this buttery produces second Caterpillar and so on. It is a circle of
life, in it is no positive (directed as arrow) development called evolution. The
true spiritual macro-evolution of R.C. would be his conversion into Orthodox
Faith.
Russells Teapot:
in orbit around the sun is ying teapot. So small that it can not be detected in
any telescopes. Civilization prays to teapot and who doubts its existence gets
burned by the Inquisition. Me: Teapot can not replace God. Therefore, such
a Society is impossible. Who needs a wretched teapot, even a space one? It
can, in principle, be detected or accidentally butt with a spacecraft. We do not
need it, so let it y in the other universe, that is: in a parallel universe ies
Sulas teapot. We can not detect it. Sulo is my father. There are no parallel
universes: Section 9.1. To prove the non-existence in space of the Russells
teapot is as dicult as to conrm its existence. And to prove a fact of non-
existence of something is possible, at least in principle. After all, there are no
solutions of the equation

x
2
+ 2 = 1.
Burden of proof
They set the rule: asserting a claim proves it. But here Poincare gave his
Poincare conjecture. And has not proved it. It got proved much later by
the Grisha Perelman, the Russian reclusive. Even by that fact this rule can
be violated. And, of course often happens so, that who has more money has
convincing power. It is articial rule, invention of people. Or does the rule
of burden come (or approved) from Holy Trinity? In this case it would have
needed authority for me to respect it.
No Big Bang.
If in a theory is the Cosmic Singularity, then the world begun to function
after it, i.e. there is no Big Bang in our worlds history [10]. Now take the
74
most popular model, the space-innite Flat Friedmann Universe and apply the
identical transformation {X = a(t) x/(|x| + 1), Y = a(t) y/(|y| + 1), Z =
a(t) z/(|z| + 1)}, you get for xed time t the box of nite size a(t). So for the
Big Bang (a 0) there is no physical universe to make Bang with.
God can know all potential ideas.
The God can (using His random number generator) compose all possible texts,
which are t in couple A4 pages. Then He can read and test/check them all,
because He is not only innity but also the Verity. As example, the random
statement will be: Is the the rational number?, He then can study the
problem, which is not the problem for the actual innity as He is. Note,
that the true statements will be mixed with untrue formulations. Just like
in Miller-Urey experiment the needed organics was hopelessly mixed with poi-
son/destructive substances. The tree of knowledge of good and evil (Genesis
2:9) is just like described generator of ideas. Hereby the atheists randomly
generate the evil statements and doubts.
God is uncaused.
Everything that has a beginning has a cause... God, as the Creator of time,
is <also> outside the time. Since He has no beginning in time, He has always
existed, and therefore He does not need a cause
http://origins.org.ua/page.php?id

story=375.
Loss in Heavens.
Page 160 in [8]. Me: martyr Fr. Daniil Sysoev (?) says, that 1/3 of angels
became demons. Read Revelation 12:4. Me: this is illustrated on asteroids,
Kirkwood gap. If orbital period is 1/3 of Jupiter, then there is no asteroid in
its home: the bloody colored Mars causes it to leave. Dear astronomer, is
about 1/3 of asteroids missing?
Analogy of Jesus?
In the Bible, Jesus Christ is true God and true man. And is in another Book of
Our Lord, the Nature, something like that? Perhaps this is electromagnetism.
In one situation the magnetism is seen, in other electricity is seen. God and
Man, the Jesus: is not merged, is not separated as in heterostructure (e.g.
diode, transistor) are several semiconductors, whose properties are dierent.
75
http://ufn.ru/ru/articles/2002/9/d/.
Creational proof, that Time exists in Nature.
He: Time is not a physical entity, but the mathematical conditional concept.
Me: Not. Read: Revelation 10:6. If the time is no longer there, then the
time was there. Does the Heaven care that much about mathematical illusion?
Possibly no. So, the time now is the physical, natural entity.
Sleep is not death.
He: Under full anesthesia, or deep dream the consciousness is disabled. Me:
And if consciousness would be not turned o in sleep, how would we rested?
And is sleeper dead? No. Heard about the subconscious? Indeed, not any
noise awakes us from sleep, only suspicious. He: As long as our minds are not
developed, we remain on the level of animals... we need to live... The animals
have no such right. Me: Down with this science, which tempts us to abortion
and murder of mentally underdeveloped. And you will learn, that grounds
are false, when you look documentary The Silent Scream. The young human,
called embryo, shows clear consciousness, when ghts the powerful suction
tube of the satanic killers: the doctor, the president and the mother.
Everybody, even paralytic can pray like a monk, so please let the cripples live.
Even the brain dead can pray in his soul and heart the own, mystical way.
No rights to choose evil.
Expression freedom of conscience does not mean the freedom to choose evil,
because conscience is from God, and the evil can not come from God. The
good voice in the heart is the Gods guardian angel.
O.Ch.: He gives the right of choice, but you took this right. Me: It is
nonsense, that a dauter says to Farther: Dad, I want to burn in hell, I will
enjoy it more, than being here with you. Father: Go, go, my daughter, good
riddance. It is your freedom of choice.
The Lord gives the right. Drivers license, civil rights, parental rights...
But He did not give anyone the right to choose hell. As a loving Father, He
curses those, who show in society the criminal examples of Free Will use: Read
Matthew 25:41. If freedom is a property of the Will, the freedom is to act
76
in accordance with the Will of the Creator and Redeemer (cf. Archbishop
Theophan of Poltava). God does not tell me what to buy, I can now choose
between a glass of milk, tea or water. Or do not drink. In such a frivolous
choice is my freedom. It is even somehow scary.
There are: God, spirits, humans, matter and Einstein ether.
The matter (for me) is all, that on the right side of the Einstein equations.
But there is a left side. Latter is not matter. To hell the God-less materialism
with its abortions, lies and tortures!
The intuitive expectation of mankind, rejected by the Theory of Relativity
may exist and is not contrary to the Theory of Relativity. It is ether, read mine
study [10].
This ether is not contrary to the postulate of Special Relativity, formulated
as all the laws of nature are the same in all inertial frames of reference. There
are laws for the ether, there are laws for the curvature of spacetime. We can
deduce the set of relevant laws in our terrestrial laboratory and apply them as
appropriate in all times and throughout the universe. But not the entire set of
laws is necessary in a particular case, for example, Ohms law and the law of
radioactive decay are not acting in the childrens water pistol. The Lord has
placed us to cultivate the garden, to be masters. The Garden becomes larger:
the historical garden of Eden, then the mainland, then the whole Earth, then
the Moon,... While revealing the secrets of the deep Universe, we understand
that there are no aliens, the beautiful Universe is small sphere like our Earth.
We are as if cultivating the Universe in the mind: we do not need a broom
to shake the dust from the stars. This is the task of the Lord Creator. We
cultivate this Garden in our inside.
The thought of eternity.
Jesus Christ will return and abolish time. So how we will live without time?
Moving in time 2 < t < 10 the particle stands still in this t = 6 eternity, but in it
life: the momentum vector, the rest energy. This is so, if we understand
eternity as a stop of time. I dreamed. Saw photo of frolicking children. Read
Acts 2:17, Joel 2:28, 1 Samuel 19:24. Photo has captured life, stoped the
77
time, caught a moment. If the time were going on, this photo would be like
a window, in which children are fossilized paralytics or inanimate. However
I have not grasped the eternity, because: 1 Corinthians 2:9.
He: arrow paradox: arrow ies through the air during a series of successive
moments; and arrow does not move in each of them, then it does not move at all.
Me: To Zeno: dear, please imagine, that to move and to have a speed are
two dierent things. The instantaneous speed (IS) determines only the Holy
Spirit. The average speed (so called speed of displacement: SD) is associated
with the movement. But, talking about the macrocosm, without IS is no SD
(this is known from mathematics). Therefore, it is another proof of God the
Ultra-rapid Creature.
Against The paradox of omnipotence.
Atheist: Can God create a stone, that can not lift? Me: This is equivalent to
the words: Can God be not God? Since He can not, then not everything He
can. These words are from the philosophy of absurdism and are outside the
logic of Aristotle. Because the last statement is equivalent to the provision of
the philosophy of the absurd: God exists. Can He not exist? Because can
not.... My unhesitating answer: because can not, then He exists! God is alive!
Since A is omnipresent (in time and space), then if A kills himself in year 2013,
then it will be dead already in 2012. How then the A managed to kill himself?
Therefore the hypothesis of the death of God is logically untenable: God exists.
Can He not to exist? Because can not, then... My decisive answer: then there
is the God! To sin is to do the deicide. God is everywhere, and if He is not in
the soul, then God is killed there.
The evil Free Will must be suppressed.
St. John Chrysostom: God does not force anyone. And if He wants, but we
do not want, then our salvation is not possible. Me: I would add, that on
a conagration might be nothing to save, all burned out. We do not want.
But in this sentence is the word we. So we still are. And if we still are, the
Trinity can save us. Even against the sick will of us! Oh, why Russia has no
compulsory treatment of alcoholic captivity? People are dying, but they can
be helped. The true (non-satanic) psychiatrists are from God and they forcibly
78
treat schizophrenics, outing their freedom. The true Doctors are from Trinity,
then the Trinity likes this freedom outing. God knows what we need. And the
prison inmates? The prison true authorities are also from God.
We must go crazy.
Dear V., do not scold, do not criticize your mom! Pray and do for her act of
bravery: Stop smoking jimsonweed and drinking dishwater! Your mother said,
that she would go mad, if she tries to quit smoking. She is right, after the most
dramatic and decisive quitting she would go mad: read 1 Corinthians 3:18. Let
us all be mad. We sing the songs to the madness of the braves!
The Holy Trinity as Standard in metrology.
He: the standard line is extending too. Me: I do not agree. On the immutability
of Standards are built all Physics and Geometry. Immutability of standards
must be enrolled in their denition, otherwise there are no standards. Likewise
the God is the Standard. After all, He is always the same (as the Holy Fathers
say), actions are dierent, but the God is one and the same (cf. 1 Cor 12:6).
Jesus is the measure of a particular action and events. Read Isaiah 3:14. Here
we are talking about Geometry. This is one aspect of life. There are others.
How long ago have we discussed the fact, that every 2-3 seconds a child dies of
hunger?
Is God simple?
Lord made a living cell. The cell is unimaginably complicated for us to under-
stand and to product. Lord is very simple. How does it t in? May be the
Lord is simple in one aspect, and complex in the other?
Who is keaper of Science?
He: And call - God or Nature - it is just a term. Me: human, has Nature
crucied itself for you on the Cross? The pagans (sounds as Estonian word for
demons) worshiped nature and therefore have not dared to make scientic
experiments on it. Please do not destroy the Science, you are rolling to sartir
of paganism! Only Orthodox Christianity was able to produce and keap the
Science.
Many channels.
Anonymous Orthodox Christian C.S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity in
79
my retelling this: because God exists also outside the concept of time,
then He is beyond the concept of simultaneous and therefore can listen to
everyones prayers.
God is person, thus the God has holy feelings, but not lust. He controls
own feelings. Humans sense of feelings is desecrated through sins.
Sun is not God.
Our father Abraham said to pagan ruler: I will not bound for the sun, because
it can not be God. A simple cloud prevents the sun to shine. Me: the neutrino
telescopes see sun even at night, because neutrino pass through the planet.
There is atheistic necessity, that the neutrino is massless (so called Standard
model). It would imply, that the Sun embraces us, because neutrino travels
instantly (in proper time) from Sun surface to Earth. But, unexplainably, the
neutrino has non-zero mass. Thus, the Sun is not like God. To save people
from pagan temptation the Holy Trinity created rest-mass for neutrinos.
Articial immortality.
There are plans to make from human a cyborg (like the Data in Star Track)
to live for ever. Me: but what about the deadly risks: wars, meteorites falling,
armed robbery, killing, terrorists, car accidents, suicide? All this innitely
reduces the eternal life. In fact on average every 7 000 years a meteorite
will hit a British man (http://cyclowiki.org/wiki). Hereby I do not know, is
this a chance, that denite human will suer; or the chance, that they will hear
about an accident on TV. The God is wonderful and has opened the only way
and Life; here is as naturalistic illustration: the immortal being found: jellysh
[3].
Miracles of discrepancy.
There is discrepancy in the measures of gravitational constant G (http://oko-
planet.su), discrepancy in size of the proton
(http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6118/417). The un-natural variation
in the speed of satellites (http://astronews.ru) I suggest to call Bruce anomaly,
as there is lm Bruce Almighty, where Jim Carrey pulls closer the natural
sattelite the Moon. I suppose some sorcerer inuences (as much as the God
tolerates) the behaviour of our satellites. The faster than light neutrinos at
80
Italy Project OPERA
(http://news.mail.ru/society/7374807) I suggest to call Phantom of the Opera
(as the lm). I suppose the Jesus has ne sense of humor.
What is information?
Formation, which is an intelligent intention (i.e. is not accidental) and has
meaning for observer is information. The clouds forming castles, faces
and horses may have direct intelligent intention (the Will of God or spirits),
thus may provide the information, however not reliable one. During the study of
stars, meteors, planets we get meaningful information. Thus, the Universe is not
accidental. Thus, the World has Intelligent Creator the Holy Trinity. There is
no natural mechanism for conserving the information, because there are: Free
Will of lifeforms (we blow the heaven and earth with a-bombs), Heisenberg
uncertainty principle, and the Black Holes eat the incoming information.
Therefore, we never can say, what was the weather 2000 B.C. Yes the chaos,
but it is not classical (solvable) one, it is the quantum chaos. The God is
necessary to remember the information, then our decomposed bodies can be
resurrected. The God has invented container for holding the information and
transfering it without the loss. It is DNA molecule. In nature the information
diminishes, but in DNA not. Therefore the DNA inside nature is like an atomic
gun on wild, inhabitable island: it is clear sign of Intelligent Creator.
all is around the Earth the place, where the Godman died and
rose from the dead.
The Sun does orbit the Earth, if You look from south window in a house: it is
the Physics, presented in non-Inertial Reference Frame.
on the Alpha.
R.A.: God has always existed...That is part of the denition of God. He is not
a created being. Me: Yes, of course. The proof: Universe must have cause T,
which has no previous cause. Otherwise, the Universe would not be here. A
cause BB is innitely precisely in the Beginning of Virtual Universe. But in
the Beginning is no Virtual Universe: a point of exactly zero volume. Thus, the
cause BB is outside the Universe. The Metaphysical Naturalism lies, that there
are no causes outside the Universe: it is the closed system without the Holy
81
Fire (see Wikipedia). If there was no reason for the Universe, then Universe is
not there. And it is there, believe it! If absolute beginning of the universe is
not there, then the Universe and life in it have not begun. But we are here, we
are alive!
To struggle through.
The Neil Alden Armstrong is popular, but his family and friends, his favorite
books and lms, his desires and thoughts, at least website of his admires were
not mentioned on his pass to afterlife. Only: breaking news! Died the rst
man on the Moon! No word about his faith. It is strange, not kind admiration.
Have they buried him or not? Yes, the rst man, but if he is atheist, he will
not be rst soul in Hell and not last. Did Christ made Himself popular? Not.
The Christ Savior saves. Christians are so badly tortured. Ancient Jews killed
the prophets. Policy of states often is against the work of Christ on Earth. But
they are powerless against the Miracle of Christ. Verity is there. Atheist: it is
simply a property of the universe. Universe gave rise to your God. Me: Prove,
colleague. Martyrs proved through torments, that God am. And you are ready
to go on the pan, to be sawn by wood saw, be drowning in shit, cooked in
boiling water? No. Well then, be silent and learn from others who know what
Orthodox God am.
Nothing is not there.
In wikipedia is article nothing. I think, nothing does not exist. The only that
exists is Verity. Therefore, the nothing is not Verity. The atheists percept the
nothing: the core of atheism: No God! Thus, the atheism is not Truth. Not
truth, thus is lie and mistake. A denition of nothing as property of absence
of properties is way to insanity. We must ght the nothing with Jesus Christ:
the cross on our neck.
What is matter.
The Lenin: matter is the objective reality, given to us in sensations. Me: this
is atheistic. The God can touch my heart and my leg, but be the God. The
matter is all that, what is in right hand of Einstein Equations.
God as a weather forecaster.
82
I think, that lifeforms can feel the variations in the nature, also in the Moon
tides inside atmosphere and ocean. The behavior of wildlife (preparation for
winter) tells us almost year in advance whether the winter is very cold or not
(see Lin Zhang et al., Current Biology, 2013). The thoughtful Creator submits
to the nature this information, I think so.
The evil exists?
The absence is real. One really suers after losing hand. The cold and darkness
exist, despite Einsteins words in http://video.mail.ru/mail/tajnaa/7/111.html.
They are our feelings. Otherwise the love as feeling is absent. Last is not true:
read Matthew 16:18. When one ignores cold or love one dies: cathes deadly
cold or goes into Lake of Fire. The man is put to hold the nature, technical
and measuring devices. Let us respect his feelings, when they are not sinful.
Evidence and Proof
Atheist: give me evidence! Me: One prayed for healing and got healed. It is
not proof, but strong evidence (voice) in favor of God.
Voltaire is a theist?
If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him(Voltaire). Because
of word necessary the God exists, otherwise Voltaire would wrote nice, but
not necessary.
Scientic truth
He: Scientic truth isnt nal, but constantly evolving. Me: The prime example
is the at Earth mistake? This can not be truth, even scientically: a mistake.
The problem with at Earth mistake: it has being presented to public as
Verity. This was either a satanic lie or mistake, and not the science.
Where is the damned sureness?
Atheist: I dont think there is god so... Me: You must be damned sure not
to go to Church of Orthodox Christianity. So You must have the solid proofs
of atheism, 100% bulletproof ones. Have You them? No. Even the Richard
Dawkins is 50% theist (cf the nal battle in video Expelled: No Intelligence
Allowed).
God speaks:
In what direction is lightning dispersed, or the east winds scattered over the
83
earth? (Job 38:24 NET). Physics can not explain everything. The three-
body problem has not been solved, and how many atoms in a plant? More
than three? Yes. Then nish up with atheism, and go with God! Atheist:
Piss o the Science! Me: brother, how to understand you??? Is nding the
boundaries and application area of Physics not the work for Physicist? Have
we solved the problem of three bodies? Not solved, because all surprises are
possible. And if the bodies will show the phrase Atheism is, but Atheism
does not exist (viXra:1402.0019) you will not be surprised. Simply select the
Cauchy problem for the three-body and ready. The Karl Sundmans innite
series solution is not the numerical method. Check [37]. It shows, that the
nature can have autonomy. But it does not exclude the Gods force. Indeed,
say to dear Karl, when You arrive in afterlife, to add to his proof the casual
forces Gods forces. Will the solution exist? Yes, there is numerical way to
get solution (trajectories) with step t but will they converge when t 0?
Yes. Indeed, for i-th body the vector of displacement is

dr
i
= v
i
t +a
i
(t)
2
/2 , v
i
=a
i
t ,
where acceleration a
i
=

F
i
/m
i
, the Gods force is inside the total force

F
i
. The
net dispacement is

L
i
=

dr
i
. To diverge this sum the forces shall cooperate
(a
i
= m), but they can not diverge it:

L
i
=

V
i
t + mt
2
/2, where laboratory time
t = nt and

V
i
is initial velocity.
Ed: Why Creator does not need the Creator, but the nature needs Him?
Me: Tell me, if you are so smart, Who creates a vacuum pair? Was emptyness,
and then came the electron and positron. Electrons energy is E, the positron
has (E). The textbooks law does not create this pair, but only describes the
situation.
Boundary task
If after the con nothing, then nothing is here. And it is not. We are
here. Errors are in the video, Serious and fatal errors. Physicist knows that
boundary problem without boundaries gives the zero solution.
Christianity believes in many things, but hopes on Christ
Atheist: Christianity is faith in tobacco. I: Do you believe that tobacco does
84
not exist? And Orthodox Christians believe in tobacco. Namely, in that there
is tobacco.
Away, mental Fog!
Croutonza: are you stating that the theory of evolution claims humans evolved
from rocks? Please cite your reference. Me: Then from God. Croutonza: why
do you believe macro-evolution is impossible and where does the leap from rocks
to humans come from? Evolution theory doesnt include the origin of life (that
would be theory of abiogenesis). Now you are mixing two theories. Me: Dear
Brother in Adam, please, be not angry on me for mixing the unmixable. The
Darwinian evolution, or what? The leap comes within what theory? The
Darwin denitely says, what the cell is created by God - The Holy Creator.
Syke OPath: WTF are you talking about?? Me: What is WTF? Syke OPath:
<insult>. Me, as like a self-proclaimed moderator: !!! Note for meaningless
message !!!
To answer a blasphemer.
So You study divine. But be careful: 1) there are evil spirits, there is satan and
satanic people, which can not be trusted. 2) The prophecies will be fullled
in the future, 3) The future can be changed, see viXra:1402.0019. We shall
understand the True and Holy God, brother. But in the rst place, we must
repair the mind via becoming True Orthodox Christians. Then the Grace of
Holy Spirit will come... You are funny with me??? Bugs Funny, go make
some papers in Physical Review, like I did... Man, is it sin of God, that He was
killed on the Cross? Not. So, please, show mercy on God... We, sick humans,
have killed the Savior, the God has simply admitted that. The Jesus Christ did
not make suicide. We, sinners, killed Him.
Error in translation? I make peace, and create evil Isaiah 45:7 KJV.
Please look this verse in NIV translation (and create disaster). The God does
not create the evil, because God is Holy.
85
25 And more...
Atheist: Whos we? Me: All we are from same blood, brothers and sisters. I
use gifts of Holy Trinity, and You use them. Do not bite the hand, which feeds
us.
Atheist: I do not believe... Me: so it is matter of choice then? Therefore I
choose happy afterlife with Jesus the Savior.
Atheist: I nd the movement of an object in my house meaningful, because
I associate something with it. My next door neighbor will not nd meaning in
this. Me: at least some meaning neighbor gets: somebody is in the house, so
it is too early to break in and to stole the plasma TV.
Atheist: And why cant cause T have a previous cause? Me: if there is no
nal cause, there is no cause at all.
Atheist: You can NEVER use Wikipedia as a reliable source. Me: the wiki
has severe review, may be peer one: I have got kicked while trying to modify
article about Proofs of God.
Atheist: it is highly implausible that any such entity... Reasonable Atheist:
but if He does, He will give to us hell. So why not be prepared for such danger?
We can not kill Him, so must obey the possibility of Him. Man, You can not
put Your sex-organ in all the sex-holes, so You can not take from life the all.
Atheist: kills several million people, children slaughtered in numbers. Me:
So You are against abortions as Jesus Christ am? No. Your satanic admiration
of abortions inspire the readers to do killing. Who is better then? God the
Viticulturist or You the Tempter? The young people are feeding the old ones.
Folk, please explain to dear man the abortion case. The abortion is ceasing of
life. Latter is killing. Thus, the humankind even today gets killed. You hate the
killing of humankind. So You must hate abortions. Pure logic, man, pure logic!
Atheist: youre strawmanning. Me: prove, brother, your three unsupported
claims: 1) strawmanning is evil, 2) evil is bad, and 3) I done strawmanning. If
this hammer is not helping, then say: How atheism denes evil? How atheism
denes bad? None denitions. You just do mad damned party in atheism.
Atheist: Knowledge is what information we have. Me: I trust the Bible, so I
86
get useful information from there the knowledge. There are plenty evidence
for Orthodox Christianity, just read my book with the eyes of theist.
Mine Cosmic Singularity is not some nite size point. It is exactly zero
in size. The quantum space in your professional description does not have
singularity: the point is very hot and dense, but the Angels can live even
there.
Humankind happily lived without atheistic propaganda for thousands of
years. Recently came atheists and say: the God does not exist, prove oth-
erwise. The reasonable default is theism. The atheism has the burden of proof.
There is no Holy Trinity in modern humanism, thus it is satanic.
Atheist: This was one of the worst written things Ive ever read. Countless
logical fallacies, lack of critical thinking... Me: The Bible is not absurd. There-
fore, You shall adjust your mind. After the Bible becomes the best book ever,
go look my book again.
Atheist: The net really is where religion comes to die. Me: No, dude,
the work at CERN can not replace the quest for perfection. Because there are
mistakes.
Shane: Its either all this, or all that. Thats a stupid way of thinking. Me:
the law of logic is stupid? No. In logic are only two options (true or false).
Theist: Who do you think God is, and how can you justify truth without
God? Atheist: An imaginary creator does not justify any truth whatsoever,
only the lies of men who seek to control others. Me: So, in absence of real
God You do lie?
Atheist: Why does your god hide away? Me: He is not hiding, but God is
polite. Otherwise all His sheep will be slaughtered in a sec. There was normal
man, but spiritually killed himself: temptation of the wicked world. And what
is remained is nothing, the atheist. You are not atheists. Even the Richard
Dawkins is 50% theist.
Only numbers, which are fractions are grasped. The number which is irra-
tional is free. Indeed, You can not express it properly. Only assign a symbol to
it: Pi, e. The Pi as perimeter of a regular polygon, which has innite number
of angles. Such polygon can exist or not? Have You seen him? If Yes, then he
87
is alive. P.S. The length is fundamental thing and the Pythagorean theorem
(also the line element, metric) is used to calculate it.
Thank You for concern of my mental health, so give me the money for treat-
ments: I would visit Jesus empty tomb for Your money. Guess, He would cure
me. There always can be more of health: too much health can not be.
The truth about the afterlife is shaping the life. You, as almost an atheist,
do party and run to fat. I do preparing, thus is shaping the souls muscles.
The dogma of Orthodox Christianity is that the matter exist, i.e. the matter
is not hallucination.
Orthodox Christianity is Love and Truth. Physics without Love and Truth is
only muck: how many times you, God-less monsters, were accepted in Physical
Review? You have dirtied own draw-well. Atheist: false proof! Me: false
proof, that leads a man to safety is not false.
Me: What are your basics? I have Holy Bible. Sinner: my common sense.
God: The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they,
and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good. (Psalm
53:1). Me to atheist: What principles are forming Your life? What direction
You follow? What is the Basic Law, constitution, of Your actions, which no
one ever will change? You: I follow common sense. Me: Your common sense
is in fact the still small voice (conscience), which planted into You the Holy
and True God. Please enter the ark, because FIRE is coming: believe in Jesus
Christ and receive the Holy Sacraments in the Church. Christianity is not for
nothing called Orthodox. Atheist: what does that actually mean? Me: Look
up in explanatory dictionary, please.
I see, that the atheists, like some rats, got immune to certain arguments.
The other arguments they simply ignore, e.g. Miracle of Lanciano (which still
has not opposition in Wikipedia). Therefore just tell them, that Jesus is alive
and will reveal them Life if they become active members of the True Church.
Please, do not make The Atheists too mad at us and angry. They simply
trample the Gods grace (Read Matthew 7:6). They simply go out right now
and beat somebody passing with a bat.
Atheist: So You are so right, but cant You just go crazy together with me?
88
Me: To judge from the position of atheism? You are asking me to cut o the
head and then start thinking! Unable to accept atheism even hypothetically:
For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities,
nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor
any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is
in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:38,39).
Atheist: Nice try though! ;P. Me: I am not trying. I simply wrote nicely
for myself. I still need be saved!!!
Brothers, who has repented here, please not hide. Give us Your stories to
save the wicked ones! I know, the President Putin, as Orthodox Christian, is
sane! Children in former east-Ukraine are not terrorists!!!
References
[1] 2014-Wikipedia Miracle of Lanciano; Prof. Odoardo Linoli, Studio
anatomo-istologico sul cuore del Miracolo Eucaristico di Lanciano (VIII
sec.); Angelus Della Cioppa, Dei et Apostolicae sedis cratia.
[2] the Astronomical Society of Japan, 61, 1247 arXiv:0905.3008v3
[3] Turritopsis Nutricula. 1996. Biological Bulletin, Vol. 190 (3): 302-312.
[4] R. Lieu, J. P. D. Mittaz, On the absence of gravitational lensing of the
Cosmic Microwave Background, Ap. J., vol 628, 583-593 (2005).
[5] Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 021301, 021302 (2011),
http://ufn.ru/ufn11/ufn11

8/Russian/r118c.pdf,
http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2124, http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.041900
[6] Orthodox Priest Daniil Sysoev, Annals of Beginning. From Creation to the
Exodus. 2nd ed. Moscow: Charitable Foundation Center of Missionary
priest Daniil Sysoev, 2011, ISBN 978-5-4279-0016-4.
[7] Rudolf Peierls, Surprises in Theoretical Physics, Princeton University Press,
1979.
89
[8] Brian E. Davies, Science in the Looking Glass: what do scientists really
know?, Oxford University Press, 2003 (2007).
[9] Richard Taylor, Andrew Wiles, Ring theoretic properties of certain Hecke
algebras, Ann. of Math. 141(3), 553572 (1995)
[10] Dmitri Martila, Simplest Explanation of Dark Matter and Dark Energy,
LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013. ISBN 978-3-659-50275-0.
[11] Robert J. Spitzer, New Proofs for the Existence of God, Eerdmans, 2010.
[12] G.M. Fikhtengolts, Fundamentals of Mathematical Analysis, Vol.1, Else-
vier (1965); ISBN 5-9221-0196-X; 2013-Wikipedia Completeness of the real
numbers.
[13] Hawking SW. Particle Creation by Black Holes. Comm Math Phys.
1975;43:199-220. Hawking SW. Black hole explosions? Nature. 1974;248:30-
1.
[14] Trevor W Marshall, Max K Wallis. Journal of Cosmology. 2010;6:1473-84.
Available from: http://journalofcosmology.com/MarshallWallis.pdf
[15] Dmitri S Martila. On Naked Singularities of spacetime Curvature. J Contra-
dicting Results Sci. 2012;1:9-13. doi:10.5530/jcrsci.2012.1.4 Available from:
http://jcrsci.org
[16] Finer 10000000000000 times (!) than the Planckian scale, any pecu-
liarity or graininess (quantumness) of spacetime was not conrmed. Me-
dia reports: Integral challenges physics beyond Einstein www.esa.int,
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110630111540.htm on observations
Laurent, P., D. Gtz, P. Bintruy, S. Covino, and A. Fernandez-Soto. 2011.
Constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation using integral/IBIS observations
of GRB041219A. Phys. Rev. D 83:121301. Available on arXiv:1106.1068v1
[17] Dmitri Martila. 2009. Zagadka vakuuma. Newspaper Mir Pravoslavija
9(138). http://www.baltwillinfo.com/mp09-09/mp-22.htm
[18] Dmitri Martila. 2009. Netochnaja tochnaja nauka. Newspaper Mir
Pravoslavija 1(130). http://www.baltwillinfo.com/mp01-09/mp-23.htm
90
[19] Hudiev SL lectures 115: Polemika s ateizmom. Lek-
cija 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX9zLTO

R5E
and Pochemu materializm oshibochen 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsM9gTCOyJk
[20] F. Belgiorno, et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 203901 (2010) arXiv:1009.4634v1
and references herein.
[21] Hawking SW. Chronology protection conjecture. Phys Rev D. 1992;46:603-
11.
[22] Michael S Morris, Kip S Thorne, Ulvi Yurtsever. Wormholes, Time Ma-
chines, and the Weak Energy Condition. Phys Rev Lett. 1988;61:1446-
9. Available from http://authors.library.caltech.edu/9262/1/MORprl88.pdf;
Aleksei Levin. 6 sposobov postroit mashinu vremeni. Popularnaja Mehanika.
2005;36:44-53.
[23] Russell Griggs opinion on Hawkings activity
http://creation.com/curiosity-did-god-create-the-universe
[24] Cornish, Neil J., David N. Spergel, Glenn D. Starkman, and Eiichiro Ko-
matsu. 2004. Constraining the Topology of the Universe. Physical Review
Letters 92:201302. Available on arXiv:astro-ph/0310233v1
[25] Upton, James. 2011. Beyond Distant Starlight: Next Steps for Cre-
ationist Cosmology. Answers Research Journal 4:1-9. Available on
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v4/n1/distant-starlight-
cosmology;
[26] DeYoung, Don B. 2010. Mature creation and seeing distant starlight, Jour-
nal of Creation 24:54-59. Available on http://creation.com; Creation Wiki:
http://creationwiki.org/Apparent

age
[27] Hawking, S.W., and G. F. R. Ellis. 1975. The Large Scale Structure of
Space-Time. Cambridge University Press.
91
[28] Bielewicz, P., and A. J. Banday. 2011. Constraints on the topology of the
universe derived from the 7-yr WMAP data. Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society 412:2104-2110. Available on arXiv:1012.3549v2
[29] Ohrstrom, Peter. 1988. The 1924-1944 discussion regarding the velocity of
light. Journal of Creation 3:155-159.
[30] Ros, E., R.W. Porcas, and J.A. Zensus. 2002. General relativistic model
for experimental measurement of the speed of propagation of gravity by
VLBI. Proceedings of the 6th European VLBI Network Symposium pp. 49-
52. Available on arXiv:gr-qc/0206022v1
[31] Grigg, Russell. 1995. Does the Bible say pi equals 3.0? Creation 17:24-25.
Available from http://creation.com/does-the-bible-say-pi-equals-3
[32] Hartnett, John. 2006. Has dark matter really been proven? Journal of
Creation 20:6-8.
[33] Hartnett, John. 2006. The big bang fails another test. Journal of Creation
20:15-16.
[34] Bidin, C. Moni, G. Carraro, R. A. Mendez, and R. Smith. 2012. Kinematical
and Chemical Vertical Structure of the Galactic Thick Disk. II. A Lack
of Dark Matter in the Solar Neighborhood. Astrophysical Journal 751:30.
available on arXiv:1204.3924v1.
[35] Olive KA, Peacock JA. 2012. Chapter 19. Big-Bang cosmology,
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-bbang-cosmology.pdf, Naka-
mura K, et al. 2010. Review of Particle Properties. J Phys G 37:075021
[36] tossing coins in Higgs boson news http://www.membrana.ru/particle/17257;
citation percent chance that the signal is noise or some statistical anomaly
in http://news.discovery.com/space/interesting-higgs-boson-result-to-be-
announced-120218.html; A statistically signicant excess of events can
scientists claim a discovery in CERN Bulletin FAQ.
[37] Qiudong Wang, The global solution of the n-body problem, Celestial Me-
chanics and Dynamical Astronomy (ISSN 0923-2958), vol. 50, no. 1, 1991,
92
p. 73-88; Thomas A. Hockey; et.al. (Sep 18, 2007). Biographical Encyclo-
pedia of Astronomers. Springer. p. 1111. ISBN 0387304002; Diacu, F.: The
solution of the n-body Problem, The Mathematical Intelligencer, 1996, 18,
p. 6670.
93