Professional Documents
Culture Documents
p0
density of particl e phase i n free
stream
I
Temperature of the flui d at free
stream
o
concentration parameter
diffusi on parameter
F
fricti on parameter between the
flui d and the parti cl e
( F =18p p
p
2
)
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3435
J max
Maxi mum number of Gri d poi nts
along Y axis
L
Reference l ength
w
Dummy variabl e
r
Gri d growth rati o
u
pw
Particle velocity on the plate
p
pw
Particle density distribution on the plate
I
pw
Temperature of particle phase on the plate
Superscripts
* Nondimensional quantities.
Fig. : Plane wall jet
INTRODUCTION
Gas-particle flows, dusty fluid flows and the flow
of suspensions have received considerable attention due
to the importance of these types of flow in various
engineering applications. The influence of dust particles
in both natural and industrial processes like sand dust
storms, tornados, volcano eruptions, fluidized beds,
coal classifiers, power conveyers, particle-laden jets,
petroleum industry, purification of crude oil,
manufacturing in the chemical, pharmaceutical,
biomedical, mineral and new materials sectors, and
increasingly grow in importance as new techniques and
applications, such as functional nanomaterials, are
developed. One important engineering application is the
predication and prevention of dust fires and explosions
in plants, storerooms and coal mines. It is well known
that many organic or metallic powders like cornstarch,
coal, aluminum and magnesium are suspended in air
formexplosive mixtures due to huge specific surface
area of fine dispersed particles.
Schlichtings model [11] of a laminar jet consider
a thin incompressible homogeneous jet issuing into a
medium at rest. This model can be analyzed easily
because the equations goverening the problem admit a
similar solutions. Pozzi & Binachani [9] have found
that the velocity distribution can be studied by a
perturbation on the Schlichtings model [11] and
obtained the first order perturbation solution in the
closed form.
Bansaal and Tak [1] have studied Compressible
laminar plane wall jet and solved the governing
equations by a proper transformation of a similarity
variable and obtained the solution for temperature
distribution in a closed form, for viscous heating, wall
heating, initial heating, for arbitrary values of prandtl
number.
Bansal & Tak [2] have obtained approximate
solution of heat and momentumtransfer in a laminar
plane wall jet. Mellivlle & Bray [3,4] have proposed a
model of two phase Turbulent jet. Panda at.el [7,8] have
studied two phase jet flow for incompressible and
compressible fluids.
No consulted effort found in the literature for
studying two phase wall jet problems. Here in the
present study, we have considered two phase jet flow of
an incompressible fluid be discharged through a narrow
slit in the half space along a plane wall and mixed with
the same surrounding fluid , Being initially at rest
having a temperature I
.
MATHEMATICAL MODELING
Let an incompressible fluid with SPM be
discharged through a narrow slit in the half space
along a plane wall and mixed with the same
surrounding fluid being initially at rest having
temperature I
=
x
L
, y
L
Rc , u
=
u
0
, :
0
Rc,
u
p
=
u
p
0
, :
p
p
0
Rc , p
p
=
p
p
p
p
0
, I
=
1 - 1
,
I
p
=
1
p
- 1
(1)
The governing equations
u
x
+
=0 (2)
x
(p
p
u
p
) +
(p
p
:
p
) =0 (3)
u
u
x
+:
u
2
u
2
o
1
1-q
PL
0
p
p
(u u
p
) (4)
u
p
u
p
x
+:
p
u
p
=e
2
u
p
2
+
PL
0
(u u
p
) (5)
u
1
x
+:
1
=
1
P
2
1
2
+
2 u
3 P
1
1-q
PL
0
p
p
(I
p
I)
+Ec [
u
2
+
1
1-q
PL
0
oEc p
p
(u u
p
)
2
(6)
u
p
1
p
x
+:
p
1
p
=
c
P
2
1
p
2
PL
0
(I
p
I)
+
3
2
Pr.eEc _[
u
p
2
+ u
p
2
u
p
2
_
3
2
Pr Ec
PL
0
(u u
p
)
2
(7)
u
p
p
p
x
+:
p
p
p
=e
2
p
p
2
(8)
Subj ected to the boundary conditi ons
y =0: u =0,u
p
=u
p
w
,
p
p
=p
p
w
,
I =0, I
p
=I
p
w ,
y =: u =u
p
=0, p
p
=0, I =0, I
p
=0 (9)
and the integral conditions
x
|u
2
( uJy
0
)|
0
Jy
+
1
1-q
PL
0
o ]u p
p
(u u
p
)Jy
0
Jy =0 (10)
x
uI( u Jy
0
)
0
Jy
=
1
1-q
2 u
3 P
PL
0
] u p
p
(I
p
I)Jy
0
Jy
1
1-q
PL
0
o Ec ]u p
p
(u u
p
)
2
Jy
Jy
0
+ Ec _u [
u
2
Jy
0
Jy (11)
SOLUTION FOR THE VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION
By taking a perturbation on the Schlichting [ 11 ] model
by writing
u =u
0
+u
1
, u
p
=u
p
0
+u
p
1
,p
p
=p
p
0
+p
p
1
(12)
where u
1
,u
p
1
and p
p
1
are perturbation quantities
and substituting in equations (2) to (5), we get two sets
of equations as follows
1
ST
SET AND ITS SOLUTION
u
0
x
+
=0 (13)
x
(p
p
0
u
p
0
) +
(p
p
0
:
p
0
) =0 (14)
u
0
u
0
x
+:
0
u
0
2
u
0
2
1
1-q
PL
0
o p
p
0
(u
0
u
p
0
) (15)
u
p
0
u
p
0
x
+:
p
0
u
p
0
=e
2
u
p
0
2
+
PL
0
(u
0
u
p
0
) (16)
u
p
0
p
p
0
x
+:
p
0
p
p
0
=e
2
p
p
0
2
(17)
Subjected to the boundary condition
y =0: u
0
=0, u
p
0
=u
p
w0 ,
p
p
0
=p
p
w0
y =: u
0
=u
p
0
=0, p
p
0
=0 (18)
Together with the integral condition
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3437
x
|u
0
2
(
(u
0
)Jy
0
)|
0
Jy
+
1
1-q
PL
0
o ]u
0
p
p
0
(u
0
u
p
0
)Jy
0
Jy =0
(19)
Since we are considering the case of a dilute suspension
of particles, the velocity distribution in the fluid is not
significantly affected by the presence of the particles.
Therefore the drag force term[ i.e. 2
nd
termin the
R.H.S. of equation (15)] is dropped. But for the
submicron particles, Brownian motion can be
significant, the concentration distribution equation (14)
above will then be modified by Brownian diffusion
equation (17). With the above consideration the
equations (15) and (19) become
u
0
u
0
x
+:
0
u
0
2
u
0
2
(20)
x
|u
0
2
(
(u
0
)Jy
0
)|
0
Jy =0
Or, |u
0
2
(
(u
0
)Jy
0
)|
0
Jy =E(soy) (21)
A similar solution of the equation (20) under the
present boundary and integral conditions is possible if
we take
V =(Ex)
1
4
,
(p),p =(
L
1
)
1
4
,
yx
-
3
4
(22)
and u
0
=
+
=(
L
x
)
1
2
(p),
:
0
=
+
x
=
1
4
(
L
x
3
)
1
4|3p
+2
2
=0 (24)
and the boundary conditions are
p =0; =0,
=0 ; p =:
=o (25)
and integral condition
2
0
Jp =1 (26)
Multiplying by (Integrating factor) throughout and
integrating the equation (24) gives,
4
2
2
+
2
=0 (27)
Where the constant of integration is zero by using
boundary condition (25).
The differential equation (27) can be linearized if we
substitute
=
dq
d]
and the
linearized formof the equation (27) is
dq
d]
1
2]
=
]
4
, as 0 (28)
The solution of (28) is given by
= = C
1
6
2
(29)
Where C is arbitrary constant to be determined.
Assuming at p =, =
,
then in view of boundary
condition (25) we get
C =
1
6
3
2
(30)
The value of
J =1
]
,
0
(31)
From(29) , we get
[C
]
2
6
J
]
,
0
=1
Or,
=40
1
4
=2.515 (32)
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3438
Now to solve the differential equation (31) we
substitute
F =
]
]
,
(33)
So that it becomes
dP
dq
=
]
,
6
(F F
2
)
Solving we get
p =
2
]
,
_ln
1+P+P
(1-P)
2
+23orctg
3P
2+P
_ (34)
To develop a computational algorithm with non-
uniform-grid, finite difference expressions are
introduced for the various terms in equations (14) and
(16) as,
w
x
=
1.5 w
]
n+1
- 2w
]
n
+ 0.5 w
]
n-1
x
+o(x
2
) (35)
w
=
w
]+1
n+1
- (1 -
j
2
)w
]
n+1
-
j
2
w
]-1
n+1
j
(
j
+ 1)
+o(y
2
) (36)
2
w
2
=2
w
]+1
n+1
- (1 +
j
)w
]
n+1
+
j
w
]-1
n+1
j
(
j
+ 1)
2
+ o(y
2
)
(37)
w
]
n+1
=2w
]
n
w
]
n-1
(38)
and
y
]+1
y
]
= r
(y
]
y
]-1
) = r
y
]
(39)
Now the equations (16) and (17/14) reduced to
o
]
w
]-1
n+1
+ b
]
w
]
n+1
+ c
]
w
]+1
n+1
= J
]
(40)
Where W stands for either u
p
0
or p
p
0
.
2
ND
SET AND ITS SOLUTION
u
1
x
+
=0 (41)
u
p
1
p
p
0
x
+p
p
0
u
p
1
x
+u
p
0
p
p
1
x
+p
p
1
u
p
0
x
+:
p
1
p
p
0
+ p
p
0
p
1
+:
p
0
p
p
1
+p
p
1
p
0
=0 (42)
u
0
u
1
x
+u
1
u
0
x
+:
0
u
1
+:
1
u
0
2
u
1
2
1
1-q
PL
0
o p
p
1
(u
0
u
p
0
)
1
1-q
PL
0
o p
p
0
(u
1
u
p
1
) (43)
u
p
0
u
p
1
x
+u
p
1
u
p
0
x
+:
p
0
u
p
1
+:
p
1
u
p
0
=e
2
u
p
1
2
+
PL
0
(u
1
u
p
1
) (44)
u
p
0
p
p
1
x
+u
p
1
p
p
0
x
+:
p
0
p
p
1
+:
p
1
p
p
0
=e
2
p
p
1
2
(45)
Subjected to the boundary condition
y =0: u
1
=0, u
p
1
=u
p
w1 ,
p
p
0
=p
p
w1
y =: u
1
=u
p
1
=0, p
p
1
=0 (46)
and the i ntegral conditi on
x
|u
0
2
(
(u
1
)Jy
0
)|
0
Jy
+
x
|2u
0
u
1
(
(u
1
)Jy
0
)|
0
Jy
+
1
1-q
PL
0
o
]u
0
p
p
0
(u
1
u
p
1
)Jy
0
Jy
+ ]u
0
p
p
1
(u
0
u
p
0
)Jy
0
Jy
+ ]u
1
p
p
0
(u
0
u
p
0
)Jy
0
Jy
=0
(47)
is identically satisfied.
Using equations (35) to (39) in (41) to (45), we get
:
1]
n+1
= :
1]-1
n+1
0.5
X
_
(1.5 u
1]
n+1
2 u
1]
n
+0.5 u
1]
n-1
) +
(1.5 u
1]-1
n+1
2 u
1]-1
n
+0.5 u
1]-1
n-1
)
_
(48)
o
]
w
]-1
n+1
+ b
]
w
]
n+1
+ c
]
w
]+1
n+1
= J
]
(49)
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3439
Where W stands for either u
1
or u
p
1
or p
p
1
SOLUTION FOR TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION
By taking a perturbation on the Schlichting [11 ] model
by writing
u =u
0
+u
1
,: =:
0
+:
1
,u
p
=u
p
0
+u
p
1
,
:
p
=:
p
0
+:
p
1
,p
p
=p
p
0
+p
p
1
,
I =I
0
+I
1
, I
p
=I
p
0
+I
p
1
Where u
1
,:
1
,u
p
1
,:
p
1
,p
p
1
,I
1
and I
p
1
are
perturbation quantities,
and substituti ng i n equati ons (6) and (7), we
get the fol l owi ng two sets of equati ons.
SET-1 AND ITS SOLUTION
u
0
1
0
x
+:
0
1
0
=
1
P
2
1
0
2
2
3
1
1-q
PL
0
u
P
p
p
0
(I
0
I
p
0
)
+Ec [
u
0
2
+
1
1-q
PL
0
o Ec p
p
0
(u
0
u
p
0
)
2
(50)
u
p
0
1
p
0
x
+:
p
0
1
p
0
=
P
2
1
p
0
2
+
PL
0
(I
0
I
p
0
)
3
2
PL
0
PrEc(u
0
u
p
0
)
2
+
3
2
Pr.Ec e _u
p
0
2
u
p
0
2
+[
u
p
0
2
_ (51)
Subjected to the boundary condition
y =0: I
0
=0, I
p
0
=I
p
w0
y =: I
0
=0, I
p
0
=0 (52)
and the integral condition
x
|u
0
I
0
u
0
Jy
0
|Jy
0
=
1
1-q
2 u
3 P
PL
0
]u
0
p
p
0
(I
p
0
I
0
)Jy Jy
0
+
1
1-q
PL
0
o Ec ]u
0
p
p
0
(u
0
0
u
p
0
)
2
Jy Jy + Ec _u
0
[
u
0
Jy_ Jy
0
(53)
Since we are considering the case of a dilute suspension
of particles, the temperature distribution in the fluid is
not significantly affected by the presence of the
particles. Therefore the 2
nd
and 4
th
termin the R.H.S. of
equation (50), and 1
st
and 2
nd
termof R.H.S. in equation
(53) are dropped.
Hence equation (50) and (53) reduces to,
u
0
1
0
x
+:
0
1
0
=
1
P
2
1
0
2
+Ec [
u
0
2
(54)
and
x
|u
0
I
0
u
0
Jy
0
|Jy
0
= Ec _u
0
[
u
0
Jy_ Jy
0
(55)
The equation (54) is a linear differential equation in I
0
.
So we can solve the equation by the principle of
superposition of solutions I
00
and I
01
such that I
00
is
the solution of the equation
u
0
1
00
x
+:
0
1
00
=
1
P
2
1
00
2
(56)
and I
01
is the solution of the equation
u
0
1
01
x
+:
0
1
01
=
1
P
2
1
01
2
+Ec [
u
0
2
(57)
So that I
0
= I
00
+I
01
(58)
I
00
and I
01
satisfi es the boundary and the
i ntegral conditi ons are gi ven by
y = 0:I
00
=0, I
01
=0
y =:I
00
=0, I
01
=0 (59)
and
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3440
I
00
u
0
( u
0
Jy
0
)
0
Jy =const =I (soy) (60)
Further,
x
I
01
u
0
( u
0
Jy
0
)
0
Jy
= Ec _u
0
[
u
0
Jy_ Jy
0
(61)
is i dentical l y satisfi ed.
It implies the constancy of the product of volume and
heatflux, for a given prandtl number, through any cross-
section of the boundary layer perpendicular to the wall.
For arbitrary value of Pr, it is assumed that
I
00
=
I
L
[
L
x
1
2
,
(p) (62)
Substituting u
0
and :
0
from(23) and I
00
from(62) in
equation (57), the function (p) satusfies the
differential equation
4
+Pr(
+2
) =0 (63)
With the boundary conditions
=0; h=0; , =0 (64)
and the Integral condition
0
Jp =1 (65)
Introducing the transformation s =[F(n)]
3
2
,
and
E(s) =
2
3
2
(p) in equation (63).
The transformed equation is
s(1s)
d
2
H
ds
2
+]
2
3
[
2
3
Pr +1 s
dH
ds
+
4
3
PrE =0
(66)
With the boundary condition
s =0: E =0 ; s 1: E =0 (67)
and the integral condition
Es
1
3
,
1
0
Js =1 (68)
Equation (66) is a hyper-geometric equation, whose
solution is given by
E(s) =A
2
F
1
(o,b,c;s) +
+Bs
1
3
,
2
F
1
(o c +1,b c +1;2c;s)
(69)
Where
o +b =
2
3
Pr,ob =
4
3
Pr, and c =
2
3
(70)
and
2
F
1
(o,b,c;s) =
u
r
b
r
C
r
=0
.
s
r
!
=
u
0
b
0
c
0
s
0
0!
+
u
1
b
1
c
1
s
1
1!
+
Since the prandtl number Pr of a fluid is always +ve
integer the series is absolutely converges.
Now by boundary condition (67), for s =0, A= 0
(71)
and H(s)=Bs
1
3
,
2
F
1
(o c +1,b c +1;2 c;s)
(72)
In (72) B is still an unknown constant which will be
determined by the integral condition (68) which is
given by
B =
5
3
]
3
F
2
[o c +1,b c +1,
5
3
,2 c,
8
3
;1
-1
(73)
The solution of the equation (57) is solved by using
finite difference technique.
Using equations (35) to (39) in equation (57), we get
o
]
w
]-1
n+1
+ b
]
w
]
n+1
+ c
]
w
]+1
n+1
= J
]
(74)
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3441
Where W stands for I
01
2
ND
SET AND ITS SOLUTION
u
0
1
1
x
+u
1
1
0
x
+:
0
1
1
+:
1
1
0
=
1
P
2
1
2
+
2
3
u
1-q
1
P
PL
0
|p
p0
(I
p
1
I
1
) +p
p1
(I
p
0
I
0
)|
+ 2Ec
u
0
u
1
+
u
1-q
PL
0
Ec _
p
p
1
(u
0
u
p
0
)
2
+ 2p
p
0
(u
0
u
p
0
)(u
1
u
p
1
)
_
(75)
u
p
0
1
p
1
x
+u
p
1
1
p
0
x
+:
p0
1
p
1
+:
p
1
1
p
0
=
c
P
o
2
I
p
1
oy
2
PL
0
(I
p
1
I
1
)
+
3
2
Pr Ec e._u
p
0
o
2
u
p
1
oy
2
+u
p
1
o
2
u
p
0
oy
2
+2
u
p
0
u
p
1
_
3
PL
0
PrEc (u
0
u
p
0
)(u
1
u
p
1
) (76)
Using equations (35) to (39) in equation (75) and (76),
we get
o
]
++
w
]-1
n+1
+b
]
++
w
]
n+1
+c
]
++
w
]+1
n+1
= J
]
++
(77)
Where W stands for I
1
, I
p1
DISCUSSION
We choose the following parameters involved
p =0.913 kg/ m
3
; p
p
=8010 kg/ m
3
; o =0.1;
=50pm,100pm ; u =0.45 m/ sec; I =0.044 m;
Ec =0.1 ; Pr =0.71,1.0,7.0; p =22.2610
-6
kg/msec; v =2.4310
-5
m
2
/ scc
Fig.-1 shows the velocity distribution u
0
,is plotted
against y. The velocity distribution near the plate is of
Blasius type and away from it resembles with the
distribution of plane free jet.
Fig.-2 & Fig.-3 depicts velocity profile u
1
without and
with viscous heating respectively for the presence of
particles of above micron size. The conclusion is that
the nature of the curve is of Balsius type near the plate
and away it resembles like the distribution of plane free
jet. The magnitude in both the cases is same .But
inclusion of viscous heating decrease the magnitude of
u
1
.
Fig.-4 shows the distribution of the perturbed velocity
u
1
for submicron size particles. Here also the
magnitude of u
1
is less in case of viscous heating. The
Pattern of u
1
near the plate is of Balsius type and away
is like that of free jet.
Fig.5 & Fig.6 Shows the velocity pattern of particle
velocity u
p
1
incase of without and with viscous heat
respectively in the presence of particles of above
micron size. Magnitude of u
p
1
is greater when
coarser particles are present. The velocity pattern is
of Blasius type near the plate and away is that of free
jet.
Fig.- 7 Demonstrates the pattern of velocity u
p
1
for
submicron Particles with and without viscous heating.
The magnitude of u
p
1
is less incase of Viscous
heating is considered. Here also the pattern is of Blasius
type near the plate and of free jet type at away from
plate.
Fig.-8. Shows the pattern of fluid phase temperature I
0
is of Balasius type near the plate and like free jet at
away fromplate.
Fig.-9 depicts the particle phase temperature I
p
0
for
various material densities of the particles. The
temperature is more in case of particles with less
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3442
material density and here also the temperature
distribution is of Blasius type.
Fig.-10 Shows the temperature distribution I
1
for with
and without viscous heating and the pattern is of
Balasius type near the plate and of free type away from
the plate.
To show the heat transfer in the wall jet, the nusselts
number is calculated for different values of the
parameter. The Value of Nu is given in Table-1 to
Table-5. Here Nu =Nu
0
+Nu
1
, where Nu
0
is the
nusselt number when the carrier fluid is not affected by
the presence of particle and Nu
1
is calculated based on
perturbation temperature I
1
. In table-1 values of Nu
0
for initial heating and viscous heating for different
values of Pr. Similarly Fig-2 shows the dependence of
Nu
1
on Pr. From Table-1 and Table-2 , it can be
observed that Nu
0
and Nu
1
is increasing in both for
initial heating and for viscous heating. Further it is
observed that Nu
0
and Nu
1
increases when x increases
i.e in the down streamdirection of the plate. In the
Table -3, the dependence of Nu
1
on Pr for initial
heating as well as viscous heating is shown. In this case
also Nu
1
increases with the increase of size of the
particle. Table-4 shows the dependence of Nu
1
on p
s
i.e material density of the particle. Here also Nu
1
increases with the p
s
. .Table -5 shows the dependence
of Nu
1
with the diffusion parameter e for initial
heating and viscous heating. It is observed that Nu
1
increases with the increase of e . From numerical
calculation, it has been observed that dependence of
Nu
0
on the size of the particles, material density of
particles and diffusion parameter is negligible.
0 5 10 15 20
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
y
0
u
Fig. 1: Velocity distribution (u
) with y
0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.0000018
-0.0000016
-0.0000014
-0.0000012
-0.0000010
-0.0000008
-0.0000006
-0.0000004
-0.0000002
0.0000000
0.0000002
D=50E-06
D=100E-06
y
1
u
Fig. 2: Variation of u
1
with y for different size of the particles(Initial
Heating)
0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.0000018
-0.0000016
-0.0000014
-0.0000012
-0.0000010
-0.0000008
-0.0000006
-0.0000004
-0.0000002
0.0000000
0.0000002
D=50E-06
D=100E-06
y
1
u
Fig. 3: Variation of u
1
with y for different size of the particles (Viscous
Heating)
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3443
0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
D=0.5E-06(Initial Heating)
D=0.5E-06 (Viscous Heating)
y
1
u
Fig. 4: Variation of u
1
with y for sub-micron particles
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
D=50E-06
D=100E-06
y
1 p
u
Fig. 5: Variation of u
p
1
with y for different size of the particles (Initial
Heating)
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
D=50E-06
D=100E-06
y
1 p
u
Fig. 6: Variation of u
p
1
with y for different size of the particles (Viscous
Heating)
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
D=0.5E-06 (Initial Heating)
D=0.5E-06 (Viscous Heating)
y
1 p
u
Fig. 7: Variation of u
p
1
with y for sub-micron particles
0 5 10 15 20
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
y
0
T
Fig. 8: Variation of T0 with y
0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.00030
-0.00025
-0.00020
-0.00015
-0.00010
-0.00005
0.00000
800
s
8010
s
y
0
p
T
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 4 Issue 8- August 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 3444
Fig. 9: Variation of T
p