Introduction to CFD Part I : What is CFD ?

I know that there are may articles/ presentations/ blogs on this topic. I thought to share my views on the way I look at overall CFD process. This is just a first
post on this topic. There would more to cover the complete introduction.
Introduction :
Computational Fluid Dynamics or simply CFD is an art/method/science/technique of solving mathematical equations governing different physics including flow of
fluid, flow of heat, chemical reactions, phase change and many other phenomena.
There are two traditional methods for studying any physics, one the conventional experimental method and other the analytical method. As far as physics of fluid
flow is concerned, the experimental method is called as Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) and the analytical method is called as Analytical Fluid Dynamics (AFD).
In EFD, a typical approach followed is to create a prototype of device under study and put it in an appropriate test facility. The measurement of some properties
like temperature and pressure (in case of fluid flow) which can give us an understanding of the physics is done through some measurement equipments. Many
scientist around the world worked together to understand the physics of fluid and heat flow. Findings of the experimental methods helped to convert the given
physics in to mathematical equations. In todays advanced world also, there are many phenomena present which doesnt have a definite mathematical formulation
and many are relying on the experimental methods only to understand the physics of the phenomena. We will get into the details of EFD in later part of article.
Experimental approach does have its own pros and cons. The disadvantage includes time and cost involved in such kind of studies. Also there might be errors in
the experimental setup or measurement techniques. If the scaling of the prototype is not done accurately, it might lose the actual physical phenomena. The main
advantage of experimental approach is that it replicates the exact physics under study without any approximation.
In AFD, we try to solve the mathematical equation (may be in differential, integral or any other form) governing the physics of phenomena under study. Analytical
solutions (which are also termed as closed form of solutions), is an exact solution of governing equations. If the physics is simple and if the governing equations
are simple, then we can obtain the solution of such equations by doing some mathematical manipulations. The example of simple physics could be static fluid. In
case of static fluid, we can get a close form solution of governing equation (momentum equation), which can give us the variation of pressure in terms of depth (p
= rho*g*z). Once we know the variation of pressure along the depth of fluid, we can calculation the load on dam which can be used while designing the dam
structure. AFD has its own pros and cons. The main advantage of AFD is that it will give us the exact solution of governing equations. So there is no error
involved in the calculation (except the error in mathematical model itself). The disadvantage of analytical method is that it can be applied for very simple governing
equations. If the equations are very complicated, there is no specific method available to solve those equations (which are the most common case as far as
industrial problems are concerned).
Experimental and analytical approaches are many time infeasible (may be because of cost, time involved or may be because of simplifications involved) to solve real
life industrial problems. So now the third approach is emerging in engineering community which is called as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). CFD is the
technique, which can reduce the experimental cost and time without doing much approximation in the governing equations. In CFD, we solve the governing
equations of given physics (may be differential form or integral form) using some numerical techniques like Finite Difference Method (FDM), Finite Element Method
(FEM) or Finite Volume Method (FVM)
It is to be understood correctly that, CFD is not a replacement for experimental or analytical approach. There are many errors (like discritization error, round off
error, algorithm error) involved in this approach. Once we get the CFD results, somewhere down the line we have to validate those results either with
experimental results or with analytical result or with both. CFD is just an add-on tool to understand more about the flow. CFD can give overall qualitative (in
terms of color plots etc) or quantitative (in terms of number) idea about the physics under study. CFD will be useful during initial design stage where many
preliminary designs have to be evaluated for its performance. Once the couple of designs are shortlisted, we can do experiments only on those designs to
evaluate its performance and validate our CFD results. This way the cost and time involved to evaluate all initial designs will be reduced.
All the three approaches EFD, AFD and CFD should go hand in hand.

Figure 1.1 : All three approaches go hand in hand
Lets take another view point to understand the process of studying any physics.
04 April, 2012 Vijay Mali (/index.php/en/blog/by-author/vijay-mali)
Figure 1.2 : Overall process of understanding physics
Figure 1.2 explains typical process of understanding any physics. Lets take a case of physics of fluid and heat flow. Both these phenomena are involved in many
devices like heat exchangers, high speed gas flows, heat ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) devices and many more. Lets say we want to study the
performance of a new heat exchanger to design and optimize for maximum possible heat exchange. A good heat exchanger will give maximum rise in the cold
fluid temperature (or maximum drop in hot fluid temperature) with minimum pressure drop (minimum pumping power for these fluids). Lets say that based on
understanding of heat exchanger device and fluid and heat flow physics, one has come up with a new design of heat exchanger. Now the task given is to find out
the increase/decrease in the temperature of cold/hot fluid as well as pressure drop across inlet and outlet. This task can be done using following approaches
1) Experimental Approach :
In this approach, we will create a prototype of heat exchangers and will carry out the experiment. The parameters measured during the experiments could be inlet
and outlet temperature of cold and hot fluid as well as inlet and outlet pressure. Once these parameters are measured, this can give us an idea about the
performance of the new heat exchanger. We can compare this existing design or any other alternate design to conclude which one is better.
In this particular approach, we have to do the similarity study (dimensional analysis). Similarity study will make sure that the scale down prototype of the heat
exchanger will have same physics as that of full scale working model. If this is not carried out, then the performance of actual full scale model will not be same as
that of prototype used in experimental study.
So the fluid and heat flow physics can be studied using experimental approach. In this approach, we have to be concerned about following points:
Similarity Study (Dimensional Analysis)
Time involved in the study
Cost involved in the study
Availability of experimental facility and measurement devices
Errors like human error, measurement error, surrounding atmosphere conditions error etc involved in the study
2) Analytical Approach :
If you have a careful look at the Figure 1.2, it shows that analytical approach is something after we could able to convert the physics under consideration in to set
of mathematical equations. Once the physics under consideration is converted into mathematical equations, we can solve those equations by doing mathematical
manipulations. There are many physical phenomena still unexplored and no definite mathematical formulation is available. We cannot use analytical approach for
studying such physical phenomena.
As far as physics of fluid and heat flow is concerned, based on physical principles like conservation of mass, momentum and energy, we can convert the physics of
fluid and heat flow into set of mathematical equations (May in differential or integral from). These mathematical equations will correlate basic properties of fluid like
pressure, velocity, density and temperature to each other. Its always not true that we can solve any mathematical equation using analytical approach. The
feasibility of using analytical approach depends on complexity of equations, the complexity of boundary conditions and off course the complexity of geometry
involved. If we consider the general fluid and heat flow governing equations, the resulting mathematical equations are second order nonlinear partial differential
equations. Its very difficult to get closed form solution for such equations for complex geometries like heat exchanger, flow over car, flow over an aircraft etc. So,
if you refer any standard text book on fluid mechanics, most of the books explain solving the governing equations for simple geometries like circular cylinder, flat
plate, airfoil etc.
To make analytical approach feasible, we do many assumptions based on problem under consideration. The typical assumptions made to simplify the governing
equations are incompressible flow, steady flow, invicisid flow, laminar flow etc. All these assumptions removes some terms from general governing equations and
simplified equations can then be solved. We have to be very careful during making such assumptions as one wrong assumption can give very wrong result. The
validity of assumption depends on the aim and objective of the problem under consideration and the physics involved. For example, we often make assumption of
incompressible flow in case of liquid flows. We know that very large about of force (pressure gradient) is needed to compress the liquid. We dont come across
such kind of high forces in real life engineering problems (for example flow of water through centrifugal pump). In most of the cases, although everything in the
universe is compressible, we can make assumptions of incompressible flow in case of liquid flows as it will not give that much difference in the solution. In case of
gas, we can definitely not make assumption of incompressible flow as very less amount of force (pressure gradient) is required to compress the gas. So
assumption of incompressible flow in case of gas flows will become invalid if the speed gas flows is high (example: flow over an aircraft). But if the gas speed is
less (means less pressure gradient), we can make an assumption of incompressible flow. If the Mach number of the gas flow is less than 0.3, we can make
assumptions of incompressible flow. Although there is compressibility effect, this is not going to make that much difference in the calculations with an assumption
of incompressible flow. So every assumption is some kind of approximation, but we should be careful about the validity of such an assumption.
To get an idea about the assumptions and simplifications, lets consider the simple equation like Bernoullis equation. We have used Bernoullis equation to
calculate the discharge through pipe. The typical procedure used to calculate discharge is as follows:
Put the venture meter in line with pipe
Measure the pressure at two sections
Use Bernoullis equation along with continuity equation to find velocity at any section
Calculate discharge using the velocity
Figure 1.3 : Experimental setup for venture meter experiment
Bernoullis Equation
If we have look at Bernoullis equation, its very easy to solve. Bernoullis equation is a very simplified form of general momentum or energy equation. If we make
following assumptions, we can get Bernoullis equation:
Inviscid flow
Steady flow
Incompressible flow
No energy addition and subtraction during two sections
One dimensional flow
If all of the above assumptions are valid (means if it does not make major difference in the results we are interested in), then we can use Bernoullis equation for
getting desired result. But many of the above assumptions are very restrictive (inviscid flow is the major limitation). We cannot definitely use Bernoullis equation
for general cases like flow of gas through pipe (not incompressible), drag on a car (not inviscid) and so on.
While using analytical approach for any problem we have to give attention to following points:
Is mathematical equation available for physical phenomena under consideration?
Is mathematical method available for solving the governing equations?
Can I make some assumptions to simplify the governing equations?
Are those assumptions valid for the problem under consideration?
Although it looks like, analytical approach is very restrictive for general case; we still use many analytical correlations and formulas in advanced studies of fluid
mechanics and heat transfer. These correlations are combination of some experimental studies (typically carried out to find the values of constants in the
correlations) and analytical studies. Following is one of the examples where drag on flat plate is specified in terms of velocity distribution, geometry parameters
and density.
Figure 1.4: Flow over flat plate
Analytical correlation for drag on flat plate
The above formula is derived using simplified form momentum equation with assumption of steady and incompressible. In the above formula, drag is specified in
terms of velocity profile at downstream end of the plate, boundary layer thickness and density of fluid. This is simple analytical correlation. To get an exact value
of drag on the plate, we can use experimental method to get velocity profile at downstream end and boundary layer thickness. Once we get both these values, we
can get the drag on flat plate.
For heat exchanger under consideration, we can use analytical methods like LMTD or NTU to find the temperatures at inlet and outlet. There are certain analytical
corrections which can be used to find the pressure drop. You can refer any heat transfer book to get an idea about these analytical approaches.
3) Numerical Approach :
If you have careful look at the above figure, it shows that numerical approach is something after we could able to convert the physics under consideration in to
set of mathematical equations. The use of numerical approach also depends on availability of numerical method to solve the governing equations. It might happen
that, the governing equations are well defined, but no specific numerical method is available for solving those governing equations. We can use numerical method
only when:
Physics is well captured in set of governing equations
Numerical method is available for solving the governing equations
Computational resources are available for numerical algorithms
There are many numerical methods available to solver set of partial or integral form of equations. Following are very regularly used methods and have their own
advantages and disadvantages:
Read 167 times

Finite Difference Method (FDM)
Finite Element Method (FEM)
Finite Volume Method (FVM)
All the above methods are going to be discussed in detail in subsequent chapters. The overall idea of all above methods is to break the complicated domain in
small parts and solver all the equations governing physics under consideration on each and every part. All above method uses following philosophy:
Solution of entire flow = Solution in all small parts
The basic ingredients of all the above methods are:
Discritization of set partial differential or integral form of governing equations (equation discritization)
Discritization of given domain into small parts (grid generation)
Solution of discritized form of governing equations on discritized geometry
Visualization of different properties in the domain
For all above methods, we have to also talk about:
Stability of the method
Convergence of the method
Conservativeness of the method
Computational resources needed
I know that many of the first readers gathering CFD knowledge may not able to understand most of the terms written above; all those terms will be made clear
in subsequent posts (the only condition is that you have to keep on reading).
Tweet 0
Share 2
Vijay Mali (/index.php/en/blog/by-author/vijay-mali)
Director and Chief Operating Officer,
LearnCAx
Inspire | Educate | Mentor
(http://in.linkedin.com/in/vijaymali) (https://www.facebook.com/VijayMali.CCTech) (https://twitter.com/Vijay_Mali)
(https://plus.google.com/u/0/109261140296924060321)
Website: LearnCAx.com (http://LearnCAx.com) Email: vijay@cctech.co.in (mailto:vijay@cctech.co.in)
Refresh comments list
Add Comment
6 Share 6 Like Share 9
#1 (/newsite/index.php/en/blog/by-category/cfd/item/2019-introduction-to-cfd-part-i-what-is-cfd#comment-15) Vijay Mali
2014-02-26 03:07
This is the first blog in the series of "Introduction to CFD". During my teaching career I came across very basic question about CFD. This is my try to cover
all those queries in my own way !! Please post any queries or comments you have !!
0
Quote
Name (required)
E-mail (required, but will not display)
Notify me of follow-up comments
Send
Refresh