Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
4
4
0
1
0
k
g
=
6
8
0
0
2
9
k
g
=
1
9
7
2
0
3
6
k
g
=
2
4
4
8
0
8
5
k
g
=
5
7
8
0
0
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 52
DCB improving grid performance?
Certainly!
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 53
Free Space Free Space
Disconnector Circuit Breaker Disconnector
Conventional current
measurement
Saving space and money
Removal of disconnectors
DCB
Reduced Space!, Increased Availability!, Lowered Costs!
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 54
Disconnecting
Circuit Breaker
Digital Optical
Current Transducer
Conventional current
measurement
Free Space Free Space
Free Space
Saving space and money
Removal of conventional CT
DCB
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 55
80 m
51.5 m
Advantages - Space requirement
Comparison, 420 kV 1 breaker system
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 56
160 m
72 m
160 m
72 m
103 m
60 m
103 m
60 m
= Disconnecting Circuit Breaker
* Disconnecting links for section clearance were used in the calculations
Saving space and money
Overview 420 kV 1 breaker solution
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 57
160 m
72 m
160 m
72 m
103 m
60 m
103 m
60 m
Area (square meters)
11520
6180
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Conventional DCB
A
r
e
a
(
s
q
u
a
r
e
m
e
t
e
r
s
)
= Disconnecting Circuit Breaker
* Disconnecting links for section clearance were used in the calculations
Saving space and money
Overview 420 kV 1 breaker solution
Space
savings
of 46%
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 58
* Disconnecting links for section clearance
were used in the calculations
Maintenance outage of line feeder, 400kV 1 1/2 solution
3,20
0,27
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
Conventional DCB
Solution
O
u
t
a
g
e
(
h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
)
Failure outage of line feeder, 400kV 1 1/2 solution
0,09
0,04
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
0,1
Conventional DCB
Solution
O
u
t
a
g
e
(
h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
)
Saving space and money
Increased performance 420kV 1 Breaker solution
DCB solution
provides
91%
maintenance
outage
decrease
DCB solution
provides
55% failure
outage
decrease
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 59
Lowering LCC
Increased performance 420kV 1 Breaker solution
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
DCB Conventional
E
U
R
LCC comparison, DCB vs conv solution, one diameter
420 kV
Initial cost
Maint and repair
Electrical losses
Total
Saving space and money
Configuration comparison 132 kV
77 m
54 m
77 m
The DCB
solution can
even
accommodate
two more
bays on the
same area
50 m 50 m 50 m
49 m
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 60
Double busbar conventional
Sectionalized single busbar DCB
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 61
54 m
77 m
54 m
Area (square meters)
4158
2450
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Conventional DCB
A
r
e
a
(
s
q
u
a
r
e
m
e
t
e
r
s
)
Saving space and money
Space savings 132 kV
Double busbar conventional
Sectionalized single busbar DCB
More than
40% space
savings!
50 m 50 m 50 m
49 m
The DCB
solution can
even
accommodate
two more
bays on the
same area
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 62
Maintenance outage of line feeder, 132kV
1,20
3,07
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
Conventional DCB
Solution
O
u
t
a
g
e
(
h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
)
Failure outage of line feeder, 132kV
0,13
0,24
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
Conventional DCB
Solution
O
u
t
a
g
e
(
h
o
u
r
s
/
y
e
a
r
)
Saving space and money
Improved performance 132 kV
DCB solution
provides 46%
failure outage
decrease
Double busbar conventional
Sectionalized single busbar DCB
DCB solution
provides 60%
maintenance
outage
decrease
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 63
Combination of
double and
single breaker
Double
Breaker
Solution
Sectionalized
single busbar
Classic
Double
Busbar
Highly reliable switching arrangements
Reduced complexity of switching scheme
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 64
H-
connection
Single
busbar
Ring
busbar
Sectionalized
busbar
Transfer
busbar
Double
busbar
Double
breaker
H-
connection
Single
busbar
Ring
busbar
Sectionalized
busbar
1
breaker
1
breaker
Double
breaker
The transfer busbar
does no longer fill
any function and
should be removed.
Better alternatives
are available for the
double busbar.
Highly reliable switching arrangements
Reduced complexity of switching scheme
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 65
Combination of
double and
single breaker
Double
Breaker
Solution
Sectionalized
single busbar
Classic
Double
Busbar
Highly reliable switching arrangements
Reduced complexity of switching scheme
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 66
Section clearance
Where to apply and why?
Single busbar Double breaker
1 Breaker Disconnecting links are
used to minimize the
outage of busbars and
lines
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 67
Primary earthing switches
Where to apply and why?
Single busbar Double breaker
1 Breaker Primary earth done from
remote
Earthing switch should
ensure no current flow in
permitted work zone
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 68
Primary earthing switches
Where to apply and why?
Single busbar Double breaker
1 Breaker Primary earth done from
remote
Earthing switch should
ensure no current flow in
permitted work zone
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 69
ABB High Voltage Products
April 26, 2013 | Slide 69
References and Examples
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 70
Worldwide references
More than 1300 units in 30 countries
Argentina
Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Germany
Hungary
Iceland
Iran
Kazakhstan
Lithuania
Mexico
Nigeria
Nicaragua
Norway
Oman
Romania
Sudan
South Africa
Sweden
Uganda
Spain
Russia
China
USA
Poland
New Zeeland
Iraq
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 71
Installations in southern Sweden 2005
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 72
Sknebrnnerier 72.5 kV
Onsala 145 kV
Grngesberg 145 kV
Lngshyttan 145 kV
Ulricehamn 72.5 kV
Hemsj 400/145 kV
Kolsva 145 kV
Untra 245 kV
Dsjebro 145 kV
Knred 145 kV
Vansbro 72.5 kV
Hallstavik 245 kV
Ekedal 145 kV
Lindome 420 kV
storp 145 kV
Repbcken 420 kV
Odensala 420 kV
Jnkping 72.5 kV
Lisselberga 145 kV
Kville 72.5 kV
Scanraff 145 kV
Ringhals 145 kV
Kvarnsveden 145 kV
If 72.5 kV
Skrplinge 145 kV
Trelleborg 72.5 kV
Tomelilla 72.5 kV
Landskrona 145 kV
Rissne 145 kV
sbro 72.5 kV
Installations in southern Sweden 2005
Voltage levels from 72.5 420 kV represented
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 73
Swedish National Grid
Experience
Swedish National Grid
Experience
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 74
Swedish National Grid
Experience
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 75
Swedish National Grid
Experience
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 76
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 77
Swedish National Grid
Experience
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 78
Swedish National Grid
Experience
Swedish National Grid
Experience
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 79
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 80
Swedish National Grid
Experience
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 83
Double busbar vs. Double breaker
Double busbar
If conventional ~75 meters
Single DCB ~70 meters
50 meters
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 84
Double busbar vs. Double breaker
Double breaker
Easy Overview
Failure resistant
solution
Less Auxiliary
Cabling
Easier control and
protection
Less foundations
Faster installation and
commissioning time
Increased safety
Increased
revenues
Less outage fees
Less expensive
and more reliable
substation
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 85
Double busbar vs. Double breaker
Removal of 14
Disconnectors
Add 3 DCB
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 87
420 kV Double busbar, Line bay
Disconnecting link
Impact examples
Double Breaker Superior availability solution
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 88
A removable link, with bolted
connection, prepared to be
opened in a quick and simple
manner under de-energized
conditions.
Highly reliable switching arrangements
Disconnecting Link reconnection example
In less than one hour the DCB
can be disconnected from the
system.
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 89
A cherry picker is used
Conductors/clamp to be
reconnected
Highly reliable switching arrangements
Disconnecting Link reconnection example
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 90
Conductor is brought in place
Surfaces are cleaned and greased
Highly reliable switching arrangements
Disconnecting Link - reconnection
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 91
Fine tuning of position using a
small pulling device
Tighten up the bolts
Highly reliable switching arrangements
Disconnecting Link reconnection example
Disconnecting link
Impact examples
420 kV Maintenance example, Increased safety
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 92
Impact examples
420 kV Maintenance example, Increased safety
Open line and busbar adjacent
breakers
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 93
Impact examples
420 kV Maintenance example, Increased safety
Lock the breakers and close the
motor operate earthing switch
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 94
Impact examples
420 kV Maintenance example, Increased safety
A clear visible earth for
maintenance staff safety
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 95
Clear visible earth,
its safe!
Disconnecting link
Impact examples
420 kV Maintenance example, Increased safety
Apply portable earthing switches
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 96
Impact examples
420 kV Maintenance example, Increased safety
Slack/remove the links
Section
clearance
Section
clearance
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 97
Impact examples
420 kV Maintenance example, Increased safety
Safe island for maintenance,
take the line back in service
Section
clearance
Section
clearance
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 98
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 99
Example 132 kV
Conventional
Solution
DCB Option
DCB
Improvment 1
DCB
Improvment 2
Maintenance or failure
12 disconnectors
directly take the
mine out of service!
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 100
Savings: 2 Breakers
24 Disconnectors
X lenghts of busbar and foundations
Plenty of space reduction
Outage decrease: (450.88 - 152.42)/450.88 ~ 66%
Conventional
Solution
DCB Option
DCB
Improvment 1
DCB
Improvment 2
A
16000
1
5
0
0
0
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
R
o
o
m
2000
3
0
0
0
6500
7
7
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
7000
2
0
0
0
39000
2
5
7
5
0
7500
2
7
5
0
1500 1500 1500
A
B
B
C
C
Example 132 kV
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 101
Savings: 3 Breakers
24 Disconnectors
X lenghts of busbar and foundations
Plenty of space reduction
Outage decrease: (450.88 - 105.69)/450.88 ~ 77%
Conventional
Solution
DCB Option
DCB
Improvment 1
DCB
Improvment 2
Example 132 kV
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 102
Savings: 4 Breakers
24 Disconnectors
X lenghts of busbar and foundations
Plenty of space reduction
Outage decrease: (450.88 58.96)/450.88 ~ 87%
Conventional
Solution
DCB Option
DCB
Improvment 1
DCB
Improvment 2
Example 132 kV
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 103
Summery
Improved in availability
Lower maintenance need
Saving in numbers of breakers and
busbars
Safety is increased when less time is
spent in the substation
Example 132 kV
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 104
Turnkey delivery of
145/12 kV indoor substation
2 x 145 kV transformers 32.5
MVA (Moved from old site)
2 x 145 kV cable bays
2 x 145 kV transformer bays
31 x 12 kV outgoing bays
2 x aux.transformers 12/0,4 kV
1 x capacitor bank
Relay and protection
Batteries
The footprint is
21.4 x 19.3 m
Bckelund substation 145/12 kV
Borlnge energi
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 105
Turnkey including:
Design
HV and MV
Civil works
Buildings
Erection and Installation
ABB Group
January 18, 2011 | Slide 105
Bckelund substation 145/12 kV
Borlnge energi
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 106
DCB Indoor ring solution
Loussavaara 145/12 kV
Vattenfall
ABB Group
January 18, 2011 | Slide 106
Loussavaara 145/12 kV
Vattenfall
Designed to fit with the
environment and
surrounding buildings
Loussavaara 145/12 kV
Vattenfall
Suitable for harsh and
urban environments.
Loussavaara 145/12 kV
Vattenfall
High Voltage, Transformers and
Medium Voltage under the same roof
Loussavaara 145/12 kV
Vattenfall
A less costly and highly
reliable alternative to GIS
substations
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 111
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 111
New Zealand
ABB preferred DCB supplier to Transpower
From Transpower Technical
Specification, 145 kV:
Transpowers main reason for putting in DCBs
is to:
(a) maximise circuit availability,
(b) minimising components that need
maintenance and
(c) increase the maintenance intervals
requiring outages from 4 years to 12 years.
ABB fulfills IEEE 693 high (0.5g)
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 112
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 112
Rio Tinto DCB substations
Why did Rio choose DCB as there preferred solution?
Benefits
Maintenance savings
Availability, Outage costs >1 MAUD/day
Reliability: Fewer apparatuses in substation
Safety: used hand operated disconnectors in the
past.
IEC 61850 compliant substation
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 113
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 113
Rio Tinto DCB substations
Preferred Design
Ring Bus
Few DCBs
Each line can be fed from two directions
Good solution for open up a power line
Sectionalized single busbar
Very good solution for parallel lines
DCB solution has a better performance than
a conventional double bus bar.
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 114
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 114
Before renovation:
Double busbar with
transfer bus, traditional CB
After renovation:
Singel busbar with
section breaker, DCB
Sample 1
145 kV Ref S/S,
Norway
Installations and operational experiences
Refurbishment, double busbar transfer bus
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 115
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 115
Before renovation:
Double busbar with
transfer bus, traditional CB
81 units of DS
Sample 1
145 kV Ref S/S,
Norway
Installations and operational experiences
Refurbishment, double busbar transfer bus
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 116
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 116
Result
- 30% of existing area
- 15 years maintenance interval
Sample 1
145 kV Ref S/S,
Norway
Installations and operational experiences
Refurbishment, Single busbar section breaker
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 117
Summary
Switchgear Solutions
ABB High Voltage Products
April 26, 2013 | Slide 118
Interrupters
Summary PASS and DCB
Operations and Safety
Minimum need for maintenance will give
fewer hours in the SS hence safer
Easy to understand the S/S layout
Fewer apparatus will make life easier
Less testing at site
Less time needed in the S/S
makes it safer
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 119
Direct Cost Savings
Land Acquisition
Land Preparation
Material savings
Busbar
Fence
Cabling
Support structures
Simplified layout
Less Engineering
Faster Delivery time
Faster Installation and
Commissioning time
Summary PASS and DCB
Direct Cost Savings
Switchgear solutions gives a lower
CAPEX
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 120
Indirect Cost Savings
Reduced Energy Losses in the substation
Increased availability:
Decreased cost for maintenance
Decreased cost and power outage
Increased revenues when the line can be in
service
Summary DCB
Indirect Cost Savings
Switchgear solutions gives
lower OPEX
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
DCB Conventional
E
U
R
LCC comparison, DCB vs conv solution, 420 kV
Initial cost
Maint and repair
Electrical losses
Total
ABB High Voltage Products
April 26, 2013 | Slide 121
Read more
Buyers and Application Guides
Design application
dcbsubstations.com
Download from
abb.com/highvoltage
ABB Group
April 26, 2013 | Slide 122