Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=
( )
M V g
o a o
,
T
2
=
( )
M V g
o w o
,
T T
2 1
=
( )
( )
M V g M V g
o w o o a o
=
( )
a w o
V g
F
T
=
( )
a w o
V g.
kI M V g
U a o 1
=
( )
kI
L1
= F
T
2002 by CRC Press LLC
(29.12)
(29.13)
from the results of the previous discussion. With simple algebra:
(29.14)
This expression is useful because it allows all the readings to be cross-checked. It was derived using
only Archimedes principle and Newtons second and third laws.
Prior to beginning the experiment, the two electronic balances are placed side by side and calibrated
with a standard weight of mass S. After calibration, both balances give the same indication when the
standard weight is placed on their respective pans and the air density is unchanged. One can predict the
change in both balance indications in the experiment, in kilograms, if the terms are expressed in SI units.
(29.15)
(29.16)
The density of water
3
(see Chapter 14) can be calculated from the water temperature measurement
and the air density
4
(see Chapter 12) can be calculated from measurements of air temperature, barometric
pressure, and relative humidity.
29.4 Experimental Results
The experiment was conducted using an 85-g silicon crystal of known volume.
1
(One could use a precision
sphere and measure its diameter and calculate its volume.) The silicon crystal volume was 37.01596 cm
3
.
The experiment was performed immediately after the balances were calibrated in situ with the standard
weight.
First, the water temperature was measured and then the balances were adjusted to indicate zero just
prior to loading. The crystal was attached to a hook on the upper balance for weighing below the pan
and the beaker of water and the blocks were placed on the lower balance pan. All the remaining instrument
indications were then recorded.
The blocks and the beaker of water were then arranged to submerge the crystal and after reaching
stabilty the balance indications were again recorded.
We can now calculate for each balance the difference between indications and compare them to the
observed difference. The calculated and observed differences are tabulated in Table 29.1.
Within experimental error, the balances indicate the equal and opposite responses in kilograms.
Table 29.1 Balance Responses
Calculated kg Observed kg
Upper Lower Upper Lower
0.0369082 0.0369082 0.0369079 0.0369070
0.0369083 0.0369083 0.0369105 0.0369084
0.0368886 0.0368886 0.0368881 0.0368881
0.0368886 0.0368886 0.0368887 0.0368884
kI M V g
U w o 2
=
( )
kI V g
L w a o 2
= +
( )
F
T
I I I I
U U L L 1 2 1 2
= =
( )
Upper balance prediction =
( )
w a o
V
Lower balance prediction=
( )
w a o
V
2002 by CRC Press LLC
An ancient and useful method of volume determination was used to obtain the crystal volume from
the observations made on each balance.
Electronic balances are usually calibrated
5
(see Chapter 10) by adjusting the balance to indicate zero
when the pan is empty and indicate the nominal value, I
C
, of the calibration weight of mass S when it
is loaded on the mechanism. I
C
and S are close to each other in value and the calibration weight has a
density
S
of approximately 8.0 g/cm
3
.
One can express the force imposed on the balance by an object of unknown mass, X, and the
corresponding balance indication, I
X
, as follows:
(29.17)
Eq. (29.17) is rearranged to obtain the volume V
X
. M
O
and V
O
are substituted for X and V
X
, respectively,
in Eq. (29.17). The expression for the crystal volume (could be any object) is
(29.18)
The upper balance data were used to calculate the silicon crystal volume. The crystal volume deter-
mined from the four experiments is 37.0239 cm
3
and the standard deviation is 0.003 cm
3
. The difference
between the measured volume and the known volume is 0.008 cm
3
and is statistically signicant. The
difference was most likely caused by gas bubbles adhering to the submerged crystal.
However, the uncertainty of the measured volume is adequate for use in ordinary weighing.
Mass is not in the expression for volume above. Furthermore, when Eq. (29.17) is solved for the mass
X, g is not present; the same is true of Eq. (29.18).
Although sufcient precision was not achieved in the experiment to observe the effect from the vertical
separation of the balances, one would expect to see 0.0000003 kg/m/kg due to the gradient in the Earth's
gravitational eld.
29.5 Conclusion
The piggyback balance experiment is easy to perform and useful in teaching students about the opposition
of the gravitational and buoyant forces. This can be especially useful for anyone engaged in high-accuracy
gravimetric measurements. There is the additional advantage of teaching the importance of the ancillary
measurements to achieve accurate results. This is especially true of the volume determination.
References
1. Schoonover, R. M., The piggyback balance experiment; an illustration of Archimedes principle
and Newtons third law, in Proceedings of the Measurement Science Conference, Pasadena, CA, 1994.
2. Newman, J. R., The Harper Encyclopedia of Science, Harper and Row Evanston and Sigma, New
York, 1967, 223.
3. Kell, G. S., Density, thermal expansivity, and compressibilty of liquid water from 0 to 150C:
correlations and tables for atmospheric pressure and saturation reviewed and expressed on 1968
Temperature Scale, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 20, 97, 1975.
4. Davis, R. S., Equation for the determination of density of moist air (1981/91), Metrologia, 29, 67,
1992.
5. Schoonover, R. M., A look at the analytical balance, Anal. Chem., 52, 973A, 1982.
S I I g X V g
a s X C a X
1
( )
[ ]
=
( )
.
V S I I I
o a s C w a
=
( )
( )
[ ]
( )
1
1 3
.
2002 by CRC Press LLC