OVERVIEW OF LAWSUIT

QBG.1306 of A.D. 2005 (Court of Queen's Bench, Regina, Saskatchewan)

Saskatchewan Court of Appeal CA 1605 of A.D. 2008
THE CAUSES OF ACTION ARE SUMMARIZED AS CONTINUOUS INJURY.
CAUSES OF ACTION:
Fraudulent Acts, Acts of Gross Negligence, Acts of Theft and Corruption and
Conspiracy, Wrongful Death of Autumn, abuse of privilege, tampering with legal
documents, obstruction of justice, breaches of trust and duty:
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES IS BASED ON: CONTINUOUS INJURY (by government
officials and those contracted with them from the pre-adoption period to date as stated in
the Statement of Claim (Amended-Fresh Copy).
Continuous injury was claimed by me as public servants acting on behalf of the Attorney
General, Saskatchewan Government in conjunction with the Attorney General, Government of
Canada brought to us CONTINUOUS HARM / INJURY as described below.

Their deceptions, lies and aggressive and oppressive actions where intended to be in control of
their own political mandates. Their actions were mirrored by the judiciary. What happened to us
was on a smaller scale than the lies and breaches of duty and trust imposed on the Aboriginal and
First Nations in splitting-up their families and placing their children in Residential Schools, taking
their lands and breaching their treaties.
They did manage to split-up our family in ignoring the truth, undermining the truth and denying my
daughter the help she deserved. Then you took our financial investment & chattels and damaged
our reputations. They took away our livelihood. With the adoption of Des we were grafted into their
collective pain which has made me even more empathic..
I accepted this but not the aftermath as described. Once they had pitted me against my adopted
daughter, against her people and used them as pawns to cause division to bring
irreparable harm to me/us I needed to do something to Stop their madness and
irresponsible and criminal actions. So I did-I litigated them!
This website is Voices of the Bruised Reeds of our nation-Canada who have suffered
from their actions or lack thereof & A CRY FOR REFORM & JUSTICE!
* The DISCOVERABILITY PRINCIPLE was pleaded, realizing in the fall of 2003 that
'continuous injury' had occurred by the Attorney General, Government of Canada and the
Attorney General, Saskatchewan Government. In the decision the facts were
MISREPRESENTED and the public domain and other lawyers across Canada who read
the CanLII website was unable to read my claim and decide for themselves if in fact it
was frivolous and should have been struck.

COURTS OF
SASKATCHEWAN

2

2
The 'Road to Justice' was very rough and unjust as described on this website. No
transparency and no way to determine the truth of my pleadings and no justice.
The registrar Mr. G. Dauncey refused to allow me to file a motion for a hearing to
determine if fresh evidence ( autopsy report ) which would support the pleading of a
wrongful death of the grandchildren's infant sister Autumn Starr would be allowed in.
After this hearing I complained to Chief Justice Laing via a letter that I left with the
registrar's office. Chief Justice Laing wrote me a page letter to assure me I was being
treated fairly. See Affidavit to Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) to support my
application To Take Leave to Appeal the decision of the Saskatchewan Courts.
THE ORIGINAL CLAIM WAS FILED JULY 25
TH
, 2005. I wrote it as a narrative
telling my story of what happened and why I deemed these defendants culpable. (that is
the causes of action and damages sought to acquire justice. I claimed continuous injury.
See one page overview of this lawsuit from the Saskatchewan courts to the SCC.
COUNSEL'S DOCUMENTS ARE NOT ATTACHED TO THIS WEBSITE,
Council could not use any of their materials filed for the original claim to support
striking the amended claim and since they filed NOTHING of substance, not even
an application to strike it or a Statement of Defence.
ALTHOUGH THIS LAWSUIT IS NOVEL AND COMPLEX
IT IS NOT REASON ENOUGH TO STRIKE IT.

CAUSES OF ACTION /PLEADINGS:
PART ONE:
1. False and fabricated pre-adoption report denying Plaintiff an informed decision
and preparing her for future challenges.
2. Fabrication of case notes by the same social worker as filed as supporting
evidence for Plaintiffs amended claim, which demonstrates his being coached as
to how to word the case notes to depict a false perception of the Plaintiff.
PART TWO:
3. Continuation of slander, false information and accusations leading to
defamation. 3 medical doctors reports, deliberately portray either Mr. Lowery
and/or Mrs. Lowery as people who have not taken proper care of their
grandchildren. They comment on the sanitation of their home, describe Ms.
Lowery as mentally unstable (delusional), indicate that if the youngest gra (a boy)
had been sexually abused by a male that the only male he was in contact with was
Mr. Lowery, and claimed that the 2 older grandchildren in their care would have
to received their injuries while in their care, without any basis for such false and
incriminating accusations. These doctors and others involved with the integrated
Regina Sexual Abuse Team did not weigh the grave damages this caused us and
the implications that could result. Such claims could have jeopardized their
grandchildrens safety and well-being. For these reasons a lawsuit was necessary
to hopefully 'get the facts straight' and hear what Charlene Dobson claimed
occurred as what she told these defendants and Arlene Lowery.

3

3
4. Continuation of slander, false information and accusations leading to
defamation. Regina Childrens Justice Integrated Sexual Abuse Team knows the
standard protocol and procedures when someone reports a child whom they
suspect had been sexually abused; that the child must be seen within 24 hours of
the reporting and at the very outside, 72 hours. The defendants waited up to 3
weeks before seeing them, and then used this time-frame to fabricate evidence
against the Lowerys as possible perpetrators of the crimes inflicted on their
grandchildren. For this they claimed damages which included pain and suffering.
5. Continuation of slander, false information and accusations leading to
defamation. Gross negligence in not securing the evidence of the injuries in
photographs, as documented in Dr. C. Normans 3 medical reports December,
1996 and the 2 reports done April 14
th
, 1997 on J. D. and his older sister Charlene
Dobson., stating photographs were done and would even be compared with one
another on Charlene Dobson, and in the end were never taken.
6. Failure to protect and had placed subsequent babies with my daughter (adopted)
whose oldest daughter accused her and others of physical, sexual and emotional
abuse and gave her permission to find her own caregiver with the last baby so
they did not need to deal with another death (if it happened) and trouble with me.
PART THREE:
7. Conspiring ( Government of Canada, Attorney General and the Saskatchewan
Government, Attorney General Breach of Court Order Sealing Order breached
by the Saskatchewan Government conspired to bring down the non-profit
organization The Anchorage Counselling & Rehabilitation Services Inc. and evict
the Lowerys from the premises they occupied their offices from. Their offices
were used for their private counselling practice and for the contractual and
employed work they did for others.
8. The hostile eviction occurred at 2060 Broad Street, Regina, SK on March 06th,
2002, orchestrated by Joyce LaPrise and the Regina Police Services. this was all
planned and proven through Arlene Lowery obtaining Access to Information.
9. Continuous injury was loss of income.
10. Continuous injury re: Joyce LaPrise and certain others, including the Regina
Police Service conspiring on behalf of the governments mentioned to unlawfully
evict the Lowerys from the property at 2352 Smith Street, Regina, SK. whereby
they were traumatized. Their actions were high handed that resulted in their
interrupting the sale of 2352 Smith Street, Regina, SK. which Arlene Lowery had
a right to sell to secure her investment but lost through their actions.
11. Saskatchewan Government, Attorney General provides Joyce LaPrise with a copy
of the Statement of Claim (Amended-Fresh Copy) after they had put a sealing
order on the file and had not indicated that they were defending her.
12. Continuing their collective vendetta to date spreading accusations and doing acts
that are intended to discredit and malign the Lowerys to others such as the
Aboriginal Healing Foundation and doing two on site audits by Revenue Canada
in an effort to 'get dirt' on us.