A Comparative Electrochemical Study on Arsenic Removal Using Iron, Aluminum,
and Copper Electrodes
Jewel Andrew Gomes 1 , Md. Sanoar Rahman 2 , Kamol Das 2 , Srikanth Varma 2 , David L. Cocke 3
1 Department of Chemical Engineering 2 Department of Civil Engineering 3 Gill Chair of Chemical Engineering Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710
Arsenic is considered as one of the toxic materials being controlled by environmental protection agencies in several developed and developing countries. It is found in the nature as constituents of the soil, minerals and also in various organic forms. It enters the air, water, and land from wind-blown dust and gets into water from runoff, leaching, soil erosion and anthropogenically from chemicals used for wood preservation, insecticides, medicine, military purpose, pigments, and electronic circuitries. There are several techniques available for removal of arsenic, such as coagulation/filtration, lime softening, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, wet chemical, and electrochemical. Electrocoagulation has been found as one of the most efficient techniques to remove inorganic arsenic with more than 99% efficiency. In this paper, we present our work on electrochemical treatment of both the inorganic and organic arsenic from water using various sacrificial electrode materials, i.e., iron, aluminum, copper, and combination of them. The floc produced by this method has been also characterized using XRD, SEM/EDS, and cyclic voltammetry.
Introduction Arsenic, a toxic trace element present in natural waters has become a major unavoidable threat for the life of human beings and useful microorganisms. Arsenic concentration in soils and water can become elevated due to several reasons like, mineral dissolution, use of arsenical pesticides, disposal of fly ash, mine drainage, and geothermal discharge [1]. It is present in natural waters in both inorganic and organic forms. The most common form of inorganic arsenic in surface water is arsenate (As(V)), while under highly reducing conditions, such as anaerobic ground waters, arsenic may form reduced arsenite (As(III)) forms [2]. The toxicity of As(III) is much higher than that of As(V). Arsenic concentration in soils and water can become elevated due to several reasons like, mineral dissolution, use of arsenical pesticides, disposal of fly ash, mine drainage, and geothermal discharge [1]. The concentration of arsenic species is mainly dependent on redox potentials [3] and pH [4]. Arsenate species are the only species that can exist at high redox potentials on the entire pH range. Electrocoagulation (EC) is a simple, efficient and promising method where the flocculating agent is generated by electrooxidation of a ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 10.1149/1.3309678 The Electrochemical Society 59 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp sacrificial anode. In this process, treatment is done without adding any chemical coagulant or flocculants, thus reducing the amount of sludge that must be disposed [5]. In an EC process, the coagulating ions are produced in situ involving three successive stages: (i) formation of coagulants by electrolytic oxidation of the sacrificial electrode, such as copper, iron or aluminum, (ii) destabilization of the contaminants, particulate suspension and breaking of emulsions, (iii) aggregation of the destabilized phases to form flocs. Cu/Fe/Al get dissolved from the anode generating corresponding metal ions, which almost immediately hydrolyze to polymeric copper, iron or aluminum oxyhydroxides. These polymeric oxyhydroxides are excellent coagulating agents. Figure 1 shows a conceptual sketch of the electrocoagulation mechanism. As shown in the Figure 1, the anodic reaction involves the dissolution of metal, and the cathodic reaction involves the formation of hydrogen gas and hydroxide ions [1].The sacrificial metal anodes are used to continuously produce polymeric oxyhydroxides in the vicinity of the anode. Coagulation occurs when these metal cations combine with the negative particles carried towards the anode by electrophoretic motion. Contaminants present in the wastewater stream are treated either by chemical reactions and precipitation or physical and chemical attachment to colloidal materials being generated by the electrode erosion. They are then removed by electroflotation, or sedimentation and filtration. Thus, rather than adding coagulating chemicals as in conventional coagulation process, these coagulating agents are generated in situ [6].
Figure 1. Conceptual sketch of the electrocoagulation mechanism. M and X indicate electrodes. They may be different or same materials. n indicates charge of the metallic ions produced. The arrows indicate the migration of electrolysis gases towards top of the solution. ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 60 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp Experimental
The electrodes used in this study consisted of copper, aluminum and iron plates. Stock inorganic arsenic solutions were prepared according to the EPA standard method by dissolving arsenic oxide (As 2 O 3 ) in 20% (w/v) potassium hydroxide and then diluting to with DI water. Solutions of lower concentrations were prepared by proper dilution. For the organic arsenic, the solution was prepared by dissolving dimethylarsinic acid (DMA/cacodylic acid) [(CH 3 ) 2 As(O)OH] to DI water. Solutions of lower concentration were prepared by proper dilution of the sample. The pH of the solution was adjusted by adding either 3 M sodium hydroxide or sulfuric acid. Electrocoagulation was conducted at different pH using three combinations of electrodes (CuCu, CuFe, and CuAl). The polarity of the electrodes were reversed every 15 min. The solution was constantly stirred using a magnetic stirrer to reduce the mass transport over potential of the EC cell [6]. The treated organic sample was prepared for measurement following EPA method (acid digestion). The sample was digested with nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide then analyzed for total arsenic in the solution.
Electrocoagulation procedure
EC was run both in flow-through EC apparatus (FTEA, manufacturer: Kaselco) and beaker-size reactor. The FTEA essentially consists of a flow-through cell, the electrode assembly, the feed pump and the DC power supply unit. A schematic diagram of the FTEA is shown in Figure 2. The volume of the reactor was 450 mL. The beaker size EC was carried out in a 250 ml beaker with magnetic stirrer, using vertically positioned electrodes dipped in the wastewater. The current and voltage during the EC process were checked using Cen-Tech multimeters. The current density was 30 mA/cm 2 and 8.3 mA/cm 2 for the beaker-size reactor and FTEA reactor, respectively. The pH of the solutions before and after EC was measured by an Oakton pH meter. EC was run for a certain period of time. After that, the EC-mixture was filtered and the precipitate was dried. The solid precipitate was characterized by XRD, SEM/EDS, FTIR and Cyclic voltammetry. The filtrate was used for determining the amount of residual arsenic.
ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 61 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of Kaselco bench reactor
Results and discussion
Arsenic removal
The Nanoband explorer (Trace Detect) was used to measure arsenic concentrations and filtrate solutions after EC process showed that more than 99.9% of arsenic was removed by using CuCu electrode pair in the treatment of inorganic arsenic. The removal efficiency varied from 86.1% to more than 99.9% (see Table I). CuCu or combination of Cu-Fe plates as sacrificial electrodes in EC process is very promising for arsenic removal as it showed in the data. The initial pH 6 was found to be the optimum pH for maximum arsenic removal. The rate of formation of metalarsenate/arsenite complexes may be lower due to solubility effects than that at pH 6.
ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 62 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp Table I. EC treatment of synthetic inorganic arsenic and their removal efficiencies
Material characterization
XRD characterization of electrode by-products
X-ray diffraction spectrum of different combinations electrodes by products was taken and presented in Figure 3-5. X-ray diffraction analysis of CuCu electrode by-product showed broad and shallow diffraction peaks. It showed (see Figure 3) presence of tenorite (syn-CuO) which is monoclinic and cubic cuprite (syn- Cu 2 O). The XRD also showed small peak at 12.7 (2 Scale) which may be of copper arsenic oxide [Cu 4 (AsO 4 ) 2 O]. The analysis of Cu Fe electrode by-product also showed the presence of tenorite (syn-CuO) and cuprite (syn- Cu 2 O) (see Figure 4). It also showed presence of magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and sympesite at 11.1 (2 Scale), 13.16 (2 Scale) and 23.05 (2 Scale). In the Cu-Al electrode by product analysis, it also showed tenorite (syn-CuO) and cuprite (syn- Cu 2 O). Other than that there was also presence of orthorhombic diaspore [AlO(OH)] and monoclinic structured bayerite [Al(OH) 3 ].
Reactor Type Electrode pH
pH (After treatment) As (ppm) (Initial) As (ppm) (Final) Removal Efficiency (%) Current Density (mA/cm2) FTEA, Cu, 2 EC Cu 4.0 11.6 50.000 0.300 99.4 8.3 Beaker Cu-Cu 4.0 8.1 1.000 0.005 99.5 30.0 6.0 7.9 1.000 <0.001 >99.9 30.0 Beaker Cu-Fe 4.0 9.8 1.000 0.009 91.1 30.0 6.0 7.8 1.000 0.004 99.6 30.0 Beaker Cu-Al 4.0 9.7 1.000 0.139 86.1 30.0 6.0 9.5 1.000 0.025 97.5 30.0 ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 63 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction analysis of CuCu electrode by-product. The x-axis indicates 2-theta (ranging from 2 to 70 degrees) and the y-axis linear intensity in counts (ranging from 6 to 1000). The red line diffraction pattern indicates tenorite, and the blue line cuprite.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction analysis of CuFe electrode by-product. The x-axis indicates 2-theta (ranging from 2 to 70 degrees) and the y-axis linear intensity in counts (ranging from 0 to 550). The red line diffraction pattern indicates tenorite, the blue line cuprite, and the pink line magnetite. 2-Theta Scale 2-Theta Scale ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 64 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction analysis of CuAl electrode by-product. The x-axis indicates 2-theta (ranging from 2 to 70 degrees) and the y-axis linear intensity in counts (ranging from 6 to 500). The blue line diffraction pattern indicates tenorite, the red line cuprite, the green line diaspore, and the pink line bayerite..
SEM and XRF
SEM and XRF were also performed on the EC by products. The SEM in general showed amorphocity and crystallinity of different sizes in the by products from EC. Figure 6 shows examplary the SEM image of EC by products. The elemental analysis by XRF confirmed the presence of As removed from the sample solution. Other elements detected in the floc come from the adsorption of the conducting electrolytes, chemicals used in the experiments and the scrap impurities of the Cu, Al and Fe electrodes.
2-Theta Scale ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 65 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp
Figure 6. SEM image of the EC-byproducts containing initial As of 1 ppm at initial pH of 6 with the CuFe electrode system.
Cyclic Voltammetry
Electrochemical analysis of EC byproducts were studied using cyclic voltammetry technique with Voltalab 10 instrument. The voltammogram of EC by product shows cathodic (reduction) peaks at -375 mV vs SSCE (saturated silver/silver chloride electrode) and around -10mV vs SSCE. The conditions of the experiment are as follows: scan rate- 5 mV/sec, electrolyte- phosphate buffer, pH- 9, reference electrode- SSSE, and temperature- 25 C. These points observed may be due to reduction of Cu 2+ or Cu + at those particular points. The proper identification is under progress.
ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 66 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp
Figure 7. Voltammogram of EC byproduct (Cu-Cu electrodes). The conditions of the experiment: scan rate- 5 mV/sec, electrolyte- phosphate buffer, pH- 9, reference electrode- saturated silver/silver chloride electrode, temperature: 25 C. The x-axis indicates potential in mV (ranging from -600 mV to +600 mV) and y-axis indicates current density in A/cm 2 (ranging from -10 to 80 A/cm 2 ).
Conclusion
Electrocoagulation is effective in treatment of water contaminated with arsenic. In this study we observed the efficiency of combinations of copper electrodes which works better (in terms of removal efficiency) than aluminum and iron electrodes alone. The frequent change of electrode-polarity may provide an efficient way for removal of both organic and metallic pollutants from water. The elemental analysis by XRF and EDS confirmed the presence of As removed from the sample solution. The XRD showed the presence of tenorite (syn-CuO), cuprite (syn- Cu 2 O), magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and sympesite in the EC by products. Other than that there was also presence of orthorhombic diaspore [AlO(OH)] and monoclinic natured bayerite [Al(OH) 3 ].
ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 67 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp
Acknowledgements
We greatly acknowledge the financial support from the Welch Foundation (V-1103), USDA (2006-38899-03586), and Lamar University Research Enhancement Grant 2009.
References
1. M.Y.A. Mollah, R. Schennach, J.R. Parga, and D.L. Cocke, J. Hazard. Mater., 84, 29 (2001). 2. M.J. Kim, J. Nriagu, and S. Haack, Environ. Pollut., 120, 379 (2002). 3. J.G. Hering, P.Y. Chen, J.A. Wilkie, M. Elimelech, and S. Liang, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 88, 155 (1996). 4. P.H. Masscheleyn, R.D. Delaune, W.H. Patrick Jr., Environ.Sci. Technol., 25, 1414 (1991). 5. V.E. Cenkin and A.N. Belevtsev, Eff. Water Treat. J., 25(7), 243 (1985). 6. J.A.G. Gomes, P. Daida, M. Kesmez, M. Weir, H. Moreno, J.R. Parga, G. Irwin, H. McWhinney, T. Grady, E. Peterson, and D.L. Cocke, J. of Hazard. Mater., B139, 220 (2007). ECS Transactions, 25 (28) 59-68 (2010) 68 Downloaded 07 Sep 2010 to 133.87.247.206. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see http://www.ecsdl.org/terms_use.jsp
Nigella Sativa Seed Based Nanohybrid Compositefe2 O3 SnO2 BC A Novel Material For Enhanced Adsorptive Removal of Methylene Blue From Waterenvironmental Research