http://sad.sagepub.

com/
Journal of South Asian Development
http://sad.sagepub.com/content/8/1/136.citation
The online version of this article can be found at:

DOI: 10.1177/0973174113477014
2013 8: 136 JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT
Chaity Das
Bangladesh War
Dead Reckoning: Memories of the 1971 Book Reviews: Sarmila Bose. 2011.

Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at: Journal of South Asian Development Additional services and information for

http://sad.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Email Alerts:

http://sad.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints:

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions:

What is This?

- Apr 15, 2013 Version of Record >>

by guest on July 8, 2014 sad.sagepub.com Downloaded from by guest on July 8, 2014 sad.sagepub.com Downloaded from
136 Book Reviews
Journal of South Asian Development, 8, 1 (2013): 127138
background of the above discussion, Pahi Saikias work assumes importance
towards reinforcing the need for a platform where communities can come together
and discuss in an interconnected and wider platform, and is an important contribution
to cross-cultural understandings.
Northeast India is today more interconnected in conflict and peace than never
before, and this interestingly presents a set of challenges and prospects at the same
time. The interconnectedness, the meandering pathways of conflict and peace, the
diverse ethnic claims and contestations, all of these require at the same time, a
separate understanding of the conflict dynamics, and a concerted, coherent and
connected vision of peace for the entire region, which cannot be done in a piece-
meal fashion. In order to make the success of counter-insurgency efforts of the
government and outcomes of the past few years translate into tangible and sus-
tainable peace in the region, the peace efforts and interventions must be informed
of the meandering nature of the pathways, and the recognition that these are not
essentially straight lines, or be explained in black and white.
The intricacies and contours of peace processes in Northeast India, in order to
be successful in the long run, have to be understood in a holistic manner, and
taken forward similarly. Pahi Saikias book is part of a process by which we
understand the complex history and dynamics of these tribal movements, and she
points out future markers of research, as she is aware of the need of a more wider
and intensive inter-disciplinary approach towards taking this understanding and
dialogue through research forward. There are many ways by which testimonies
and stories of peace, violence and resilience is carried across communities, and
this book connects understandings of three case studies in more ways than one.
Mirza Zulfiqur Rahman
Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati India
Sarmila Bose. 2011. Dead Reckoning: Memories of the 1971 Bangladesh
War. Gurgaon: Hachette India. ISBN-10: 0231701640: ISBN-13: 978-
0231701648
DOI: 10.1177/0973174113477014
When Sarmila Bose uses the description Memories of the 1971 Bangladesh War,
one expects it would fall into one of the gaps that scholarship on 1971 has left
unexplored, except in native accounts. Scholarly and journalistic versions of the
war in 1971, such as that of Sisson and Rose and Anthony Mascarenhas, offer a
limited account of the build-up, diplomatic manoeuvring and violence and none
on the aftermath of the conflict. The author invites the reader to treat her conclu-
sions as revelatory for what emerged from her research surprised her. It was
General A.A.K. Niazis (the Eastern Commander of the Pakistani forces in 1971)
wisdom that has admittedly guided her: Early in the study, after interviewing
General Niazi, I mentioned to him that I was trying to write about 1971 without
by guest on July 8, 2014 sad.sagepub.com Downloaded from
Book Reviews 137
Journal of South Asian Development, 8, 1 (2013): 127138
emotion. No keep the emotion, he had said, your writing will be the better for
it. Over the years I have come round to agreeing with that view (p. 12). Bose,
undoubtedly, writes a passionate account. In her hands though, memories become
competitive.
When she examines allegations of excesses of Pakistani soldiers, she pits the
memories of individual soldiers against their victims. This method lends arbi-
trariness to her conclusions. While she cites Anthony Mascarenhas to corroborate
her charge of Bengali violence against Biharis, she dismisses other observations
on the Army excesses and genocidal action which were part of his famous Sunday
Times article, insinuating that most of it was only rumour regurgitated as eye-
witness account. The mass killings of Hindu refugees at Chuknagar during 1971
is sought to be dismissed as sheer banditry (p. 123). Obviously then the local
Bengali Awami League politician who still seeks official recognition for this mas-
sacre of Hindus lacks credibility since his uncle was a well-known Razakar (col-
laborator) and had probably led the military to Chuknagar! Her respondents tell
her of Bihari military while her sources in the Pakistani army remember nothing
of such an incident. The matter rests, it seems, for Bose with a sudden tone of
moral righteousness recommends that the army investigate the band of twenty-
five, thirty men behind the genocide which brought a nation and its army lasting
disgrace. While historians will clearly have issues with her book, my quarrel with
it is that while she uses the word memories to set the tone of her research she
uses them opportunistically, sometimes as alternative history and sometimes as
motivated recall depending on who her subject is. Second, the prominence of
oral sources in current research is important for the affective dimension which
traditional historiography cannot address. Bose is clearly wanting in such aware-
ness and her claim that she sympathises with her victims will surely disturb
those acquainted with the discourses of secondary witnessing in the study of
violence and war. Her criticism of Jahanara Imams wartime classic Ekattorer
Dinguli is a case in point. Her choice of the title Ballad of a Tragic Hero to
describe Rumis (Imams son) place in the nationalist imaginary is disingenuous.
The argument, stripped to its bare essentials, is that Rumi and his friends should
have known more about guerrilla warfare than expose themselves to a crackdown
by being careful in choosing their hideouts. Also they had morally erred in killing
civilians in their attack on military targets. Boses summing up of the horrible
torture of suspects (including Rumi) by the military is revealing: Custodial vio-
lence is a curse that is endemic all over South Asia and infected both sides of the
conflict in 1971 (p. 143). Imams memoir, to those familiar with Bangladeshi war
memoirs, shall appear to be a more significant addition to the archives of womens
writing on conflict than Bose gives it credit for.
Her refusal to understand the import of words is carking. In her final chapter,
Words and Numbers: Memories and Monstrous Fables she takes exception to
the Bangladeshi use of the expression hanadar bahini (occupant forces) for the
Pakistani military since in 1971 East Pakistan was a province of Pakistan, a coun-
try created in 1947 as a homeland for South Asias Muslims (p. 163). It was
by guest on July 8, 2014 sad.sagepub.com Downloaded from
138 Book Reviews
Journal of South Asian Development, 8, 1 (2013): 127138
clearly a search for a language that would express both outrage and terror of those
nine months, the horrors of the military crackdown on 25 March and the extent of
sexual violence. She then prescribes the word enemy as the one with appropriate
connotations. The entire edifice of Boses work rests on her attempt to discredit
the official figures of the dead and the raped. Therefore, the search for truth leads
her to a foregone conclusion visible from the very beginning of the workthe
numbers are exaggerated and most Bangladeshi accounts are monstrous fables.
Yet when she says that comparisons with the Holocaust are an obvious attempt to
benefit from the association with the horrors of Nazi Germany and an insult to
the victims of the Nazi Holocaust (p. 183), her impatience with victims accounts
and the desire to exonerate the vanquished men in uniform is evident. This
polemical tone corrodes the authors attempt to address the important yet under-
researched area of Bengali atrocities on minorities in 1971.
Bose is unable to see beyond numbers and almost characterises memories of
the war in Bangladesh as a search for its own six million victims. One wonders
what benefit would accrue to the survivors and witnesses from comparisons with
the fate of Jews in Hitlers Germany. It is true that there are significant diver-
gences between the two, both historical and in the nature of violence and memo-
ries of survivors. Also while Auschwitz may be invoked as a parallel in accounts
of erudite authors, the common unlettered or semi-literate survivors in their testi-
monies access no such metaphor. Indeed if Bose had studied the literature of the
Lager for reasons other than the details of the dehumanising torture and the num-
bers of the dead she would have appreciated the importance of points of reference,
analogies and metaphors from the past in articulating mass suffering imposed by
the State upon the stranger in its midst. The horrors of Auschwitz are so much
part of our vocabulary denoting experience of the inhuman (Agamben has
explored this question eloquently in his Remnants of Auschwitz) that summoning
it has become almost inescapable. It is worthwhile to critique the framework of
the analogy. However, it is particularly amusing that Bose herself draws in the
Holocaust arbitrarily towards the end of the book only to suggest that the real
victims of 1971 would feel slighted by the reference.
To conclude, Dead Reckoning: Memories of the 1971 Bangladesh War, remains
an exercise in glossy revisionism.
Chaity Das
Assistant Professor
Kalindi College, University of Delhi
Email: chaity.das@gmail.com
by guest on July 8, 2014 sad.sagepub.com Downloaded from