Professional Documents
Culture Documents
from horizontal. The tube was kept still and the slurry
was allowed to ow in the tube at a velocity of 8.5 cm/s
which falls in the range of previously reported slurry veloc-
ities in magnetic separators [3,11]. The eld intensity in the
center of the gap between the poles was 1000 G as measured
with a hall probe gaussmeter. The pulp density was adjusted
to 3% solids by weight [12].
All tests were performed using distilled water and at the
natural pH of the pulp.
3. Results and discussion
In order to investigate the effect of particle size on the
recovery of magnetite particles in a low intensity magnetic
separator, different size fractions of magnetite, alone and
mixed with the same size quartz particles at a 0.50.5 ratio
were subjected to magnetic separation tests in a Davis tube
tester. The results are given in Fig. 1. It is seen that in both
cases, recovery of magnetite decreased notably as the parti-
cle size decreased. While magnetite recoveries remained rel-
atively high, more than 90%, for sizes coarser than 23 m,
the recovery of magnetite dropped to around 50% for par-
ticles less than 7.5 m. This nding can be explained, as
discussed previously, by the hydraulic drag force becom-
ing the predominant force on the ner particles. For all size
fractions, magnetite recoveries were a few percentage points
lower for magnetitequartz mixture than for magnetite by it-
self. Grades of the magnetic concentrates obtained from the
magnetite pulp were 510% higher than those obtained with
the magnetitequartz mixture. The reduction in the grade
with the magnetitequartz mixture can be attributed to the
entrapment of quartz particles in the magnetically occu-
lated magnetite particles recovered.
It was thought that the drop in the recovery of ne mag-
netite particles in a magnetic separator can be prevented
by a proper size enlargement process. Flocculation is com-
monly used in mineral industries for particle aggregation.
Aggregation by occulation is accomplished by the bridging
of many mineral particles together by an organic polymer,
occulant [5]. For this study, corn starch, a natural polymer
with a known special afnity towards iron oxides and used
in the selective occulation of iron ores [9], was used as the
occulant. Effect of starch addition on the recovery and the
grade of the magnetic concentrate obtained from different
size fractions below 23 m (the size below which magnetic
concentration recovery dropped sharply, Fig. 1) was investi-
gated. The results of the tests with two fractions; the coarsest
23 +16 m and the nest, 7.5 m, are presented in this
paper. The magnetic concentration test results using corn
starch with the two size fractions consisting of only mag-
netite in one case and a mixture of magnetite and quartz in
the other are presented in Figs. 2 and 3, as Fe
3
O
4
grade and
recovery curves. As can be seen from the gures, addition
of starch up to 5 mg/l dosage improved the recovery of mag-
netite particles whether alone, the solid lines in the gures or
mixed with quartz, the dashed lines. The improvement in the
magnetite recovery for the ner fraction (7.5 m), being
around 20%, was substantially higher than for the coarser
fraction (23 + 16 m), being around 5%. Such a result
is expected as the magnetite recovery of 7.5 m particles
A.I. Arol, A. Aydogan / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 232 (2004) 151154 153
Fig. 1. Effect of particle size on the recovery and grade of magnetite in a magnetic separator.
Fig. 2. Effect of starch addition on the recovery and grade of 23 + 16 m magnetite particles in a magnetic separator.
154 A.I. Arol, A. Aydogan / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 232 (2004) 151154
Fig. 3. Effect of starch addition on the recovery and grade of 7.5 m magnetite particles in a magnetic separator.
without any corn starch addition was much poorer, around
50% against above 80% for the 23+16 m fraction. More
starch addition would not improve the recovery, on the con-
trary a notable drop in recovery beyond 5 mg/l starch addi-
tion was observed. This was likely to be caused by the well
known re-dispersion of the pulp as a result of complete cov-
erage of particle surfaces by the occulant leading to the
loss of bridging sites on individual particles which behaved
as single particles rather than aggregates [5]. It was also ob-
served that the recovery and the grade obtained with the pulp
containing only magnetite were somewhat higher than with
the pulp containing magnetitequartz mixture. The drop in
grade can be explained as before and the drop in the recov-
eries could be related to the shielding of magnetite particles
by quartz particles.
4. Conclusion
Loss of valuable minerals during the concentration of ul-
trane magnetite particles have been reported to be signi-
cant. Such losses are expected to increase in tonnage in the
future as the need to treat lower grade magnetite ores in-
crease and/or as the iron making industries demand cleaner
concentrates both requiring ner grinds. Size enlargement
of ultrane magnetite particles followed by magnetic sepa-
ration may be a remedy for the losses.
References
[1] D.J. Spottiswood, E.G. Kelly, Introduction to Mineral Processing,
Willey, New York, 1982.
[2] B.A.Wills, Mineral Processing Technology, Pergamon Press, Oxford,
1985.
[3] J.A. Oberteuffer, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-10 (1974) 223.
[4] G. Basaran, Beneciation studies on the ne iron ore tailings of
divrigi concentrator, MSc Thesis, Middle East Technical University,
Ankara, Turkey, 1988.
[5] P. Somasundaran (Ed.), in: Proceedings of the International Sympo-
sium on Fine Particles Processing, vol. 2, Las Vegas, SME-AIME,
New York, 2428 February 1980, p. 947.
[6] D.W. Fuerstenau (Ed.), Froth Flotation, SME-AIME, New York,
1962, p. 170.
[7] I. Iwasaki, S.R.B. Cooke, D.H. Harraway, H.S. Choi, Trans.
SME-AIME 223 (1962) 97.
[8] G. zbayo glu, . Hosten, . Atalay, C. Hiyilmaz, A.I. Arol (Eds.),
Mineral processing on the verge of the 21st century, in: Proceed-
ings of the Eighth International Mineral Processing Symposium,
Antalya, Turkey, 1618 October 2000, Balkema, Rotterdam, 2000,
p. 271.
[9] P. Somasundaran (Ed.), in: Proceedings of the International Sympo-
sium on Fine Particles Processing, vol. 2, Las Vegas, SME-AIME,
New York, 2428 February 1980, p. 1034.
[10] S. Mathur, P. Singh, B.M. Moudgil, Int. J. Miner. Process. 58 (2000)
201.
[11] N.L. Weiss (Ed.), SME Mineral Processing Handbook, Part 2,
SME-AIME, New York, 1985.
[12] A. Aydo gan, Enhancement possibilities of recovery of very ne
magnetite particles in magnetic separation, MSc Thesis, Middle East
Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 1994.