Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sixteenth (2007)
(2007)
International
International
Offshore
Offshore
andand
Polar
Polar
Engineering
Engineering
Conference
Conference
Lisbon, Portugal, July 1-6, 2007
Copyright 2007 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers(ISOPE)
ISBN 978-1-880653-68-5; ISBN 1-880653-68-0(Set); ISSN 1098-6189 (Set)
the 32,000 natural slopes vulnerable to heavy rain are in peril situation.
The ultimate objective of this study is to enhance the present risk
assessment system in terms of proper geotechnical inputs for better
prediction of failures in the region.
ABSTRACT
Lightweight dynamic cone penetrometer was successfully applied to
investigate natural Masado slopes vulnerable to failure in Hiroshima
prefecture, Japan. Based on the laboratory calibration test results, a way
of determining void ratio, e from the data of cone resistance, qd was
established for different degrees of saturation. A process of
manipulating shear strength parameters from the data of qd was
proposed based on the correlations developed between void ratios with
qd and shear parameters. Finally, a method of determining the design
shear strength parameters was proposed based on the lower boundary of
cone resistance data.
INTRODUCTION
Shallow slope failures on Masado, a residual soil of heavily
decomposed granite, slopes are common during torrential rain all over
Hiroshima prefecture, Japan. At present, 22,000 natural slopes and
10,000 valleys are found to be susceptible to landslide disasters in
Hiroshima prefecture, the highest number of any prefecture in Japan
(Thi ha, 2005). Failure of unstable slopes in the region not only put the
lives and properties at risk, but also has adverse effects on day-to-day
activities. Although, occurrence of these failures cannot be prevented
completely, the loss of lives and properties can be lessened through
appropriate counter measures. That requires quantitative approaches,
and design of control or remedial measures. The current risk
assessment system, developed by prefectural government of Hiroshima,
is based on rain fall data and past records of failures. Sangrey and
Williams (1984) pointed out that slope failures do not occur direct
proposition to precipitation quantity and some years a given quantity
produces many landsides while in other years same quantity produces
few failures. Also, slope failures occur during heavy rainfall are due to
weakening of inbound shear strength of soils (Anderson and Sitar,
1995; Brand, 1981). Due to these facts, the use of existing risk
assessment system for accurate prediction of failures in the region is in
doubt. Moreover, the present system was found to be developed
without carrying out any reliable slope stability analyses and most of
1205
80
60
40
44
Angle of internal friction d
.
Percentage passing (%)
100
20
0
0.01
0.1
10
42
40
38
Sr=40%
Sr=50%
Sr=60%
Sr=70%
Sr=80%
36
34
32
30
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Void ratio e
1.1
Sr=40%
Sr=50%
Sr=60%
Sr=70%
Sr=80%
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Void ratio e
1.1
(1)
where:
1206
(2)
Interpretation of results
The data collected under the measurements of pore pressures were
analyzed the hypothesis described in Eq. 2. Fig. 4 illustrates the
cohesion determined in effective stress state under different void ratios
and degrees of saturation. In calculating the cohesion, failure envelopes
were assumed to be linear. For the easiness of understanding
attenuation of cohesion due to pore pressures at effective stress state,
apparent cohesion recorded under total stress state were also drawn in
the Fig. 4.
Sr=50%
12
Effective stress
Total stress
8
4
16
Cohesion (kPa)
Cohesion (kPa)
16
(striking mass)
8
4
0
0.7
Sr=70%
12
0.8 0.9
Void ratio e
1.1
Effective stress
Total stress
8
4
0.6
16
Cohesion (kPa)
0.6
Cohesion (kPa)
Effective stress
Total stress
16
Sr=60%
12
0.7
0.8 0.9
Void ratio e
1.1
Scale
Rod train
Dialogue Terminal
Sr=80%
12
Effective stress
Total stress
Rod Guide
4
0
0
0.6
0.7
0.8 0.9
Void ratio e
1.1
0.6
0.7
0.8 0.9
Void ratio e
1.1
Cone
The blow from the hammer to the anvil provides energy input, and a
unique microprocessor records the speed of the hammer and depth of
penetration. The dynamic cone resistance is calculated from a modified
form of the Dutch Formula, as shown in Eq. 3. It should be noted that
the expression for energy used in this formula (MV2) is for kinetic
energy, as the energy input is variable and is delivered manually by the
blow of the hammer. Dialogue terminal displays not only the real time
data but also the dynamic cone resistance and penetration depth
graphically and in tabular form.
qd =
2
1 1 2 M .V
1
.
.
P
A 1+
x90 0
M
where:
x900 = penetration due to one blow of the hammer (90 cone),
1207
(3)
M
= weight of the striking mass,
P = weight of the struck mass, and
V = speed of the impact of the hammer.
where:
= bulk density of soil in kN/m3, and
Z = depth in m.
q d 5 = q d 0.01 (Z 5)
The main objective of this part in the study was to develop strength
correlations between qd (LWDCPT) and shear strength parameters and
there by use the correlations to predict the shear strength parameters
from the in-situ LWDCPT data. A series of LWDCPTs were performed
under void ratios ranging from 0.6 to 1.1, and degrees of saturation
ranging from 50% to 90% in the calibration chamber. A typical
calibration test arrangement is shown in Fig. 6.
(4)
2.5
Sr=40% A B
Sr=50%
Sr=60%
Sr=70%
Sr=80%
Sr=90 100%
40%
LWDCPT
2.0
50%
60%
1.5
70%
1.0
80%
0.5
90-100%
0.0
Weights
0.5
Acryl cylinder
Porous plate
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
Void ratio e
Base plate
The low values of cone resistance at most of the test conditions may be
due to disregard of essential gravel fraction in Masado soils in carrying
out laboratory penetration tests. However, it is more important to
observe the materials have weak shear strength which initiates the slope
instability problems. The close investigation of the relationship
indicates that cone resistance is drastically decreased at higher void
ratios. These are clearly displayed in the curves drawn in Fig. 7. The
graphical correlations shown in Fig. 7 can be approximated to the
formula shown in Eq. 5. This facilitates to calculate void ratio from the
qd data for known degree of saturation. The proposed empirical
relationship can be further developed with the availability of more data
especially in higher degrees of saturation (>70%).
S 100
(5)
where:
qd = Cone resistance in Mpa, and
S = degree of saturation in percentage.
All data collected at different void ratios and degrees of saturation were
reanalyzed to examine the effect of overburden in determining the cone
resistance. It has been observed that the variation of cone resistance
with overburden stress is almost in similar rate irrespective of void
ratios and degrees of saturation. The linear ascent gradient
(0.01Mpa/1kPa) was observed the graphs drawn between cone
resistance with overburden stress (Athapaththu, Tsuchida, Suga, and
Kano, 2007)
1208
Mt. Gagara
275 m
0.25 m mesh
270 m
1.0 m mesh
In-situ LWDCPTs were conducted at a site 220 m away from the pilot
site, Ikeno-ue, in Gagara Mountain. Topographically, the site is
identified as a first order valley approximately 200 m in length and 50
m in width running into northwestern direction. Lateral slopes of the
valley were covered with dense vegetation and in some places well
matured large trees were observed. Ground water was observed logged
in the middle of the main valley.
Hiroshima prefecture
Not in Scale
Fig. 8. Site location and grid arrangement for in-situ tests
Classification of profiles
Soundings of 55 grid points (a-1 to e-11) were statistically analyzed,
and the average cone resistance in 50 mm intervals was calculated. It
was observed that most of the soundings could be fitted into six
patterns based on the trend of variation in cone resistance with the
depth. Categories were numbered from A to F and graphically
presented in Fig. 9. The detailed characteristics of patterns can be found
in the previous literatures (Athapaththu, Tsuchida, Sato, and Suga,
2006a and 2006b) and an additional description in terms of degree of
weathering is presented below.
Penetration resistance (MPa)
10
15
10
3
4
5
Pattern A
10
10
5
6
2
3
4
Pattern D
5
6
Pattern E
c-9
d-8
d-9
d-10
b-10
Depth (m) .
Depth (m) .
Pattern C
15
a-6
c-10
c-11
d-11
a-5
(a) Valley
Eight in-situ test spots each 5 m spacing were established close to the
valley crest as circled in the Fig. 10(a). It is believed that the initiation
of slope failure occurs within this area and a substantial number of tests
points were proposed within close proximity of the locality. Eight test
locations spacing 20 m parallel to the center line of the valley in either
side were established as shown in Fig. 10(a). LWDCPTs were
conducted at each point up to the hard layer. It was found that most of
the soundings (88%) could be classified into the proposed six patterns.
Fig.10 (b) illustrates the distribution of patterns of the site. Since nearly
half of the soundings (46%) show very low values at shallow depths
(>2.0 m), those profiles were identified as the trend of pattern D.
Patterns A and B occupied 29% and 12.5% of the total soundings while
some of the soundings (12.5%) couldnt be fitted well into the
proposed categories. None of the soundings was identified as patterns
C, E, and F. This analysis revealed that the six patterns identified at the
pilot site in Ikeno-ue, Gagara Mountain can be successfully applied to
other locations with a reasonable accuracy.
10
15
a-8
b-9
e-9
2
3
4
Pattern F
5
6
(b)
15
Pattern B
12.5%
Pattern D
46.0%
Test points
a-11
b-5
b-6
b-7
b-8
b-11
c-7
c-8
e-7
e-11
Center line
Fig. 10. Sketch of the test locations (a) and distribution of patterns (b)
Pattern A
29.0%
15
Gagara -Site I
Undesided
12.5%
Pattern B
10
Depth (m)
Valley crest
15
d-6
a-3
a-1
b-3
c-1
c-3
c-5
d-1
d-3
d-5
c-6
Depth (m)
.
Depth (m)
c-2
d-2
d-4
d-7
e-1
e-2
e-3
e-4
Depth (m) .
0
1
1209
20
40
60
80 100
20
40
60
80 100
20
Pattern A
60
80 100
Pattern C
Pattern B
40
0.5
3
4
2.5
20
40
60
80 100
40
60
Coefficent of Variance(%)
80 100
0.5
20 40 60
80 100
Pattern E
Pattern D
Pattern F
1.5
Depth (m)
0.5
1
Depth (m)
20
1.5
Depth (m)
0.5
COV (%)
0
20
40 60
80 100
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1.5
2.5
In general, slope failures occurred under heavy rain are due to the
saturation of fine particles. Therefore, determination of shear strength
of fine particles is essential for slope instability analyses. In-situ
recorded soundings are due to the different material encountered along
profiles. Authors proposed to use the lower boundary of a particular
sounding in order to determine the qd values of fine particles. The
redrawn penetrograms considering the lower boundary should be used
to decide the design qd value for a specific depth of a single profile. The
design penetrograms of 0.25 m grid considering the lower boundary
values of each sounding are shown in Fig.14 (b).
40
60
80 100
40
60
80 100
Depth (m)
1
1.5
2.5
3.5
60
10
I-1
I-2
I-3
I-4
I-5
II-1
II-2
II-3
II-4
II-5
III-1
III-3
III-4
III-5
IV-1
IV-2
IV-3
IV-4
IV-5
V-1
V-2
V-3
V-4
V-5
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
(a)
Coefficent of Variance(%)
40
20
1.5
2.5
2.5
I-1
I-2
I-3
I-4
I-5
II-1
II-2
II-3
II-4
II-5
III-1
III-3
III-4
III-5
IV-1
IV-2
IV-3
IV-4
IV-5
V-1
V-2
V-3
V-4
V-5
1.5
4
10
80 100
0.5
40 60
Pattern C
Depth (m)
0.5
20
Pattern B
Pattern A
Depth (m)
20
0.5
Depth (m) ..
0
0
0
0
Coefficent of Variance(%)
Coefficent of Variance(%)
Depth (m) ..
(b)
80 100
Fig. 14 Soundings of 0.25 m grid data (a) and their lower limit curves
Pattern D
Depth (m)
0.5
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Pattern E
1.5
1210
10
7/15
20
7/10
7/15
7/10
7/5
100
6/30
10
195cm
30
7/5
200
100cm
40
6/30
20
Reference to the Fig. 7 and Eq. 5, void ratios were calculated using the
data of qd for locations illustrated in Fig. 16. Apparent cohesion was
calculated thereafter referring to the Fig. 3. In predicting void ratios, the
average degree of saturation in a fine day was assumed to 40 %. The
assumed values of degree of saturation are well within those calculated
from volumetric water content variations shown in Fig. 15. Fig.17
illustrates the variation of predicted void ratios and predicted cohesion
at four grid points. Predicted void ratios, cohesion and internal angle of
friction from the lower boundary of qd values also shown in Fig. 17.
50cm
50
6/25
300
30
60
Cumulative rainfall (mm).
Hourly rainfall
Cumulative rainfall
6/25
40
soundings recorded before the rainfall as shown in Fig. 16. This has to
be used for calculation of shear parameters. However, more data is
required to draw reliable outputs and to make solid relationships for the
reduction of cone resistance under different rainfall conditions.
Date
Date
Predicted cohesion
Predicted cohesion-LB
LB- Lower Boundary
Data collected from in-situ tests carried out after the rainfall were
statistically analyzed and plotted with respect to the location. In order
to examine the variation of penetration resistance, in-situ tests carried
out before and after the rainfall were plotted in the same penetrograms
as shown in Fig. 16.
0.5
1.5
2.5
2.5
Penetration resistance (Mpa)
4
10
0.5
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
0.5
1.0
40.5
2.0
2.0
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.6
1.2
Void ratio e
Cohesion (kPa)
0
5 10 15
Pattern D-(c-10)
1
1.5
1.0
1.2
20
0.0
Before rain
After rain
0.8
Void ratio e
Before rain
After rain
39.5
0.5
1.5
38.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
39.0
39.5
Pattern B-(c-5)
0.0
38.5
0.5
Cohesion (kPa)
5 10 15 20
10
15
0.0
Before rain
After rain
Depth (m) .
Depth (m)
Pattern A-(e-2)
Depth (m)
0.5
Depth (m) .
Before rain
After rain
20
0.5
Depth (m)
Cohesion (kPa)
5 10 15
0.0
Depth (m) .
40.0
1.0
40.5
1.5
0.5
1.0
38.0
1.5
Pattern C-(b-7)
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.5
0.6
0.8
1.0
Void ratio e
Considerable variations of cone penetration resistance were noted in insitu tests conducted before and after rainfall. The deviation of cone
resistance is different with the depth. That may be due different
materials encountered along the soil strata. However, it is quite clear
that there may be clear reduction of penetration resistance due to partial
saturation of underneath materials. As suggested the design
penetrograms were drawn considering the lower boundary for the
1.2
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Void ratio e
1211
5 and Fig. 7 were compared with the in-situ samples taken at the depth
of 0.5 m. The measured values of void ratios are plotted in the Fig. 17.
It could be observed that the calculated void ratio is in good agreement
with the measured value in locations e-2 (pattern A). However, the
calculated void ratios were underestimated from the measured values in
locations c-5, b-7, and c-10 which belong to patterns B, C, and D
respectively. The reasons for these differences are explained below.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable suggestions and
comments by Dr. Koji Ichii, Associate professor, Graduate School of
Engineering, Hiroshima University, Japan and the financial assistance
provided by the Ministry of Science and Education, Japan.
REFERENCES
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The primary objective of this paper was to present an efficient and
simple methodology to find the shear strength parameters of Masado
soils based on the cone penetration test data. On the basis of the content
of this paper following conclusions can be drawn.
1. The internal angle of friction of reconstituted Masado soils
was found to be linearly varying with void ratios
approximately. Fairly good linearly varying relations were
established between void ratios and apparent cohesion under
different degrees of saturation.
2. It was found that the pore pressure effect is quite significant in
determining the cohesion of Masado soils. The reduction of
apparent cohesion due to suction was found to be 10% to
60% depending on the degree of saturation.
3. Laboratory calibration tests revealed that there is fairly good
relations between qd with void ratios of reconstituted Masado
under different degrees of saturation. Empirical equation was
developed to calculate the void ratio from cone resistance
data at a known degree of saturation.
4. A method of determining shear strength parameters from the
data of qd was proposed based on the correlations developed
between void ratios with qd and shear parameters.
5. The scatter of the cone resistance at different grid spaces was
quantitatively analyzed by mean of COV. It was found that
COV varies 0% to 40% for all range of data. The variance of
1212