Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The complexity and multiple facets of the Mill Valley Streetscape Plan require a multi-disciplinary team
with a shared vision. Our team is selected for their expertise in the many disciplines required. Each firm
has guaranteed over 85% dedicated time and service to the Miller Avenue Streetscape Project. This
team have preformed previous work with the City of Mill Valley or who have worked together on similar
projects in the past. We view the City and the Advisory Committee as members of the team. Our intent is
to work as an extension of the City resources to solve the Miller Avenue Streetscape.
Section 1/1
Firm/Team Experience
Section 1/2
Firm/Team Experience Relevant Projects Per
Project Manager:
Section 1/3
Firm/Team Experience
Section 1/2
* Denotes LOCAL Mill Valley Resident
6 Degrees Group
Social Media Marketing
Kristin Burghart, Project Manager
Jeff Burghart, Project Manager
ILS Associates W-Trans Alta Planning Davis Langdon Gnu Group Ralph Osterling
Civil Engineer Traffic Consultant Bicycle Consultant Cost Estimator Signage Consultant Consultants, Inc.
Arborist
* Irving Schwartz Steve Weinberger Ian Moore Alistair Rich Burns
Project Manager Project Manager Project Manager Project Manager Project Manager Ralph Osterling
Project Manager
Steven Schmidt Zachary Matley Michael Jones Dickson Keyser
Engineering Supervisor Sr. Transportation Founding Principal Design Director Walt Fujii
Planner Consulting Staff
Robert Day Kristin Maravilla
Survey Supervisor Josh Abrams Landscape Designer
Transportation
Arthur Smith Planner
Civil Engineer
Allan Titlon
Sr. Associate
Section 2/1
PROJECT VISION, UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Section 3
OVERALL APPROACH 5 key questions
Question 1
Mill Valley’s citizens are actively involved in major planning decisions and care deeply about community
character and the elements of good design. This project is also critical to a number of local interests,
including the business community, adjoining residential neighborhoods, bicycle and pedestrian advocates,
and affected property owners. In addition, the City Council has appointed a Design Advisory Committee.
Observations
We will develop a public involvement plan, with a range of programs that will provide the most important
project related information and education possible. We will utilize all the current social networking sites
and mediums while promoting efficient and engaging user controls tools to provide the community
with all of the information it will need to understand the design process and, when necessary, make
informed decisions. The public involvement program will provide as many opportunities as possible for
the community to interact with the design team, including the ability to upload photographs, videos and
provide input at all phases of the project, The key element of the public involvement program is that it is
continuous throughout the entire project.
Describe the outreach program as a flow chart and narrative showing timing, proposed steps, proposed
goal of the outreach and education program, and key participants or stakeholders.
Action Approach
Identify Mill Valley’s population can be characterized by the ways in which they are
constituencies & comfortable accessing information about the Miller Avenue Streetscape Plan
special interests process. Interested parties can be described as follows:
groups 1. members of the community proficient in the latest social networking and
communication technology tools.
2. community members not having access to, or are not comfortable using,
these communication techniques
3. community members currently unfamiliar with the project or who have
demonstrated no interest. Those who choose not to attend public meetings,
or find it difficult to express their concerns, are in the third group.
Section 3/1
Action Process
Develop and Assure consistent and timely updates with relevant content to assure
manage content continuity, engagement and rapport with the online community.
Schedule public
meetings The public involvement plan includes a comprehensive set of interactive
programs, including five public workshops, to be held at key milestone
events during the project. One of the workshops will feature a “mini-
charrette” process to review an array of alternative design elements and
develop additional conceptual solutions.
Process and Create the methodology for processing in-put and feedback.
feedback
Section 3/2
OVERALL APPROACH
Question 2
Understanding Mill Valley character and the functionality of Miller Avenue are critical to creating a
successful Streetscape Plan for Mill Valley.
Include:
• what do you see as the street’s major opportunities and constraints?
• how will your consultant team use this information to create a plan that achieves the four main
streetscape components with community support, cost-effectiveness and expeditious?
Observations
Mill Valley is a self described ‘quirky’ community. In actuality, it is one of the country’s most desirable
places to live. The abundant natural resources and beauty first attracted the Coast Miwoks and then the
Rancho settlers. The Eastland settlement (Mill Valley’s original name) grew into a lumber town serving
the needs of the Presidio and San Francisco. A new railroad spur transported lumber and other goods
and attracted new business and visitors. In the summer, tourists would ride the scenic railway to Mt.
Tamalpais and enjoy the views and outdoors. A classic railroad suburb to be sure, Mill Valley emerged as
one of the Bay Area’s most coveted addresses.
Now the City is at once suburban and rural. Miller Avenue embodies the best and worst features of the
community. As a primary thoroughfare, it serves its utilitarian function. The alignment with Mt. Tam
capitalizes on one of the City’s great treasures – the views to the mountain. Portions of the street capture
the historic legacy of timberland and harvests. Others sections are hardly distinguishable from other
suburban commercial streets.
A successful Streetscape Plan for Mill Valley must capture this heritage along with the finest elements
of street design, from setbacks and beyond. It must be a collector and a connector to the adjacent
neighborhoods. Its main function, carrying traffic, must allow complementary activities and uses, and
seamlessly integrate the elements of great street design. It must be the perfect melding of the essential
streetscape plan components as listed below.
Section 3/3
Traffic and Parking Access & Other
Management Connectivity Design Considerations
Action Approach
Opportunities To capitalize on the efforts, studies, consensus, community feedback and other
resources that have been applied to Miller Avenue to date.
To create goals and aspirations for Miller Avenue that transcend current approaches.
Constraints A process that inhibits expansive thinking and that creates complexities that
complicate the process.
Community Community input, support and approvals are critical to a successful streetscape.
support Question 1 addresses in detail the methodology for engaging the community.
Establish While not listed as a constraint above the funds available and the
communications implementation costs are significant to the breadth of the plan. We will work
tools with the City to establish financial proformas that allow meeting the goals of
the program. Question 5 addresses this topic in greater detail.
Schedule public Implementation can happen as expeditiously as the City’s procedures for
meetings approving, procuring and contracting for services will allow. The initial steps in
the process will establish the timelines and benchmarks for meeting them.
Section 3/4
OVERALL APPROACH
Question 3
Identifying issues, collecting data, evaluating options and building consensus are all important steps in
creating a successful Streetscape Plan that is supported by the community. Of the five specialized studies
listed in Task 4, select one (1) specialized study, and discuss your approach in detail.
Include:
• data and data collection required;
• the proposed decision policy;
• necessary design guidelines;
• outline for the study;
• how this information might be presented to the public.
Our response to this question focuses on Task 4 Specialized Studies – Green Streets Analysis
Observations
Miller Avenue must integrate the wealth of indigenous tree species native to Mount Tamalpais and the
surrounding wild land areas. Redwoods and Douglas fir were once heavily logged from the slopes of
Mount Tam and processed in historic Mill Valley.
As the gateway to Mill Valley, Miller Avenue should showcase the heritage of the native species. Current
street trees include a significant variety. Lombardy poplars, California peppers and sweet gums frame the
eastern end of the Avenue. Magnolias, red maples, birches, walnuts and pistache are located in sidewalks
and medians leading up to Sunnyside Avenue.
Retaining mature trees and infilling with appropriate species will contribute to an urban forest feel and
add to the natural ambiance of the City.
Apart from the redwoods, there are no other native tree species in the right of way (back of curb to
opposite edge of sidewalk). The different landscape treatments within each of Miller Avenue’s ‘five
rooms’ result in the eclectic character of the Avenue. A goal of the street tree program is to unify
the corridor and create a cohesive look, feel character and brand for the City’s arrival experience.
Maintenance, growing conditions, exposure and liability have surely influenced the current mix of trees.
Our focus will be to develop a landscape palette that will meet pragmatic concerns while achieving the
optimal character and image for the Avenue and City.
Section 3/5
Our Methodology
Action Approach
Data collection Conduct a Green Tree Analysis consisting of a tree assessment and inventory
of all trees located in the City Right of Way (ROW - the area between the back
of curb and the opposite edge of sidewalk). All trees four inches or greater
in trunk diameter when measured at four feet from the existing grade and all
multi-stem trees having one stem four inches or greater in diameter will be
included in the assessment and inventory. Large shrubs will not be inventoried.
Proposed Work with the Landscape Architect in the selection and placement of suitable
decision policy/ tree species. The tree species must be appropriate for the micro climate and
Necessary design for its proposed location. Trees for merchants must be attractive yet allow for
guidelines sign visibility whereas areas of social activity would require a shade tree with
an inviting nature.
Presentation to Presentation to the public will include the walk through meetings to discuss
the public tree resources and answer questions from the public regarding enhancement,
preservation and replacements. Meeting presentations will include PowerPoint
images coordinated with team presentations. Meeting presentations will
include question and answer sessions.
Section 3/6
OVERALL APPROACH
Question 4
Miller Avenue has a long history that has resulted over time in a number of design and
operational “quirks” that have endeared themselves to local residents and are considered part
of Mill Valley’s character.
Include:
• Site specific examples based on your understanding of existing conditions and history
• Your approach to the design of a “complete” street (functional, sustainable, multi-modal)
that retains the authentic qualities that make Miller Avenue a unique feature of Mill Valley?
Observations
This question is gratifying in that the use of the term ‘complete street’, suggests an appreciation for
the value of designing the entire length of Miller Avenue with continuity that allows the creation of a
unified image and brand statement for Mill Valley. This does not mean predictable or boring but rather
an appropriate integrity and character to make it decidedly Mill Valley’s own. Details may change within
‘rooms’ to reflect the special use distinctions but there will be no mistaking that one is on Mill Valley’s
main street. Our team will work with the community to identify the traditional aesthetics that will
reconstitute Main Street’s small town ethos.
Section 3/7
Action Approach
Main Street, as identified by the Final Summary Report, is the most challenged
room due to its inconvenient center median parking which encourages
jaywalking, odd frontage roads and long and dangerous crosswalks for older
or mobility challenged pedestrians. Yet it is these “operational quirks” that
distinguish Main Street from the rest of the rooms along Miller Avenue.
Second, we will continue to vet the Task Force recommended options of Curbside
Parking #2, Frontage side parking #2 and Median Center Parking until our design
team and the community have reached consensus that we have achieved a high
level of safe interplay between bicyclists, pedestrians, buses and cars.
Third, we design the streetscape. We will take into consideration the needs
of each business owner and the operational requirements that need to be
addressed. For example, a restaurant owner requires outdoor dining in front of
the restaurant. Our streetscape design would plan for tables and chairs, ABC
(Alcoholic Beverage Control) enclosures if they have a license to serve alcohol,
an unobstructed ADA public path for pedestrians and solar/wind and climate
control if necessary.
Our design team find solutions for affordable & safe circulation routes for
pedestrians, bikes, cars and buses.
Bio-swales & storm drain vortex/fossil filters to treat roadway drainage before
flowing to the Bay, porous/permeable pavements to reduce run-off, solar
powered appurtenances, street furnishings made with recycled materials,
native plant material concepts, rain gardens are a few sustainable concepts
that will be considered.
Section 3/8
OVERALL APPROACH
Question 5
Cost and phasing are integral to the successful implementation of the Miller Avenue Streetscape Plan.
Include:
• How your final recommendations on cost and phasing ensure that the design concepts in
your plan can be implemented in the right sequence and time frame and minimize the need
for “value engineering”?
Observations
The length and complexity of Miller Avenue could consume resources far in excess of the monies
that have been identified as available for implementation. This means that the plan must be created
and managed to meet a finite budget. In the early stages of the process we will identify the order of
magnitude of resources needed to achieve various levels of design and infrastructure improvements.
We imagine that there will be an appetite for a solution that transcends current available dollars and
this will mean developing alternative strategies including sourcing additional funding or phasing the
implementation over time. The implementation approach will be one of the topics for consideration by
citizen groups.
Action Approach
Implementation Phasing, budgets, schedules and quality control are the variables of every
plan streetscape improvement program. We will develop a plan that meets the
mandates of the City for implementation budgets, timing and phasing. This
is what we do and what we have done for other public and private
streetscape projects.
Section 3/9
WORK PLAN & SCHEDULE
There are six work tasks listed in the proposal. They are:
Section 4/1
Work Group #1 : The team will prepare a comprehensive public deliverables
Public Outreach involvement plan, to reach all members of the Mill Valley • Public
Campaign (Task 2) community, from old to young, technologically savvy Involvement
Duration: 9 Months to technologically inept, and those interested to those Plan
uninterested. We will orient the community to Work Plan • Community
#1, 2 & 3 and establish ground rules and develop Miller Involvement
Avenue’s Design Vision, project goals and objectives. Activities
We will utilize an array of programs to maximize public • Meeting &
involvement in the streetscape design process, including:. Community
Outreach
• Prepare project mailing lists
Materials
• Develop a newsletter distribution • 5 Public
• Create a dedicated project website, Workshops
• 2 Walking Tours
• Utilize a variety of social media programs such as
• 2City Council
facebook and blogging to coordinate community
Meetings
groups
• Project Website
• Local cable access presentations
• Create newsletter preparation schedules & newsletter
distribution preferences
• Provide one-on-one interviews with members of the
community and meet with neighborhood associations
• Host two walking tours
• Lead 5 community workshops, including one mini-
charrette
• participate in City Council presentations
• Present to DAC during design process
• Provide one-on-one interviews with members of the
community
• Meet with neighborhood associations
Work Group #2: In this work group, our design team will perform the deliverables
Ratifying Task Force following sequence of work to achieve the Traffic • Work Plan &
Recommendations & Parking Management and Access & Connectivity Schedule
(Tasks 1, 3 & 4) objectives outlined in the Essential Streetscape Plan • Project
Duration: 5 Months Components Chart (RFP Table 1). Management
Reports
• Draft Table of
1. Prepare a revised work plan and project schedule Contents
incorporating new community, DAC and City Council • Existing Public
direction, strategy, and budget projections Parking System
Analysis
2. Prepare the ongoing project management program. • Public Parking
Analysis
• Parking
3. Prepare a detailed site conditions survey that shows:
Demands
• Limit of Work
Analysis
• Buildings
• Parking
• Waterways Demand
• Utilities Management
• Roadway & sidewalks
• Exiting trees
• Topography
• Other data & field information
Section 4/2
Work Group #2: 4. Summarize stakeholder and community issues to be deliverables
Continued addressed • Two Roadway/
Ratifying Task Force Parking
Recommendations Configurations
(Tasks 1, 3 & 4) 5. Research and summarize Analysis
Duration: 5 Months • Miller Avenue documents • Transit Analysis,
• Inventory &
• Local/state/federal safety standards Assessment of
• Flood and tidal issues Existing Street
• Sustainability goals & objectives Trees within
ROW
Section 4/3
Work Group #3: In this work group, our design team will perform the deliverables
Designing the following sequence of work to achieve the Streetscape • Preliminary
Streetscape Design & Other Considerations objectives outlined in the Streetscape
(Tasks 5 & 6) Essential Streetscape Plan Components Chart (RFP Table 1). Concepts Plan
Duration: 4 Months • Detailed Design
1. Prepare conceptual plans, sections, sketches to address Options
Miller Avenue’s aesthetic needs: • Flood
• Cultural / Art Management &
• Visual sight lines Creek Access
• Greening / Open space Study
• Character & Image • Typical Street
• Sustainability Cross Sections
• Texture and Materiality • Implementation
• Street and Building Lighting Plan
• Street furnishings • Preliminary
• Historical context Cost Estimate
• Outdoor amenities for Each Design
• View enhancement • Power Point
Presentation
& Support
2. Prepare comprehensive signage, way finding and
Graphics for
environmental graphics program that includes:
2 City Council
• Field reconnaissance Meetings
• Signage opportunities and constraints • Preliminary
• Signage objectives & goals Streetscape
• Character / Branding strategy Plan, Full Size &
• Signage design to address massing scale, look, color & 11x17
materials • One Digital
• Way finding circulation Copy
• Sign placement • One Camera
Ready Copy
3. Prepare cost / benefit analysis, implementation and of Streetscape
phasing scenarios to meet cost and budget constraints. Plan
• Two Draft
4. Preliminary opinion of probable construction costs that Streetscape
address: Plans
• Design options and alternatives • Final
• Construction cost & feasibility Streetscape
• Phasing & timing Plan for
• Implementation priority Adoption
• Potential funding sources
Section 4/4
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9
1 194 days Mon 1/4/10 Thu 9/30/10
Miller Avenue Streetscape Schedule
2 Work Group #1 -Public Outreach Campaign 194 days Mon 1/4/10 Thu 9/30/10
3 Task 1 - Work Plan 15 days Mon 1/4/10 Fri 1/22/10
4 Refine scope & schedule 5 days Mon 1/4/10 Fri 1/8/10
5 Team meeting 1 day Mon 1/11/10 Mon 1/11/10
6 Staff meeting 1 day Tue 1/12/10 Tue 1/12/10
7 DAC meeting 1 day Wed 1/13/10 Wed 1/13/10
8 Finalize scope & schedule 5 days Mon 1/18/10 Fri 1/22/10
9 Task 2 - Community Involvement Plan 15 days Mon 1/25/10 Fri 2/12/10
10 Prepare Public involvement plan 5 days Mon 1/25/10 Fri 1/29/10
11 Set-up Website 5 days Mon 2/1/10 Fri 2/5/10
12 Identify Community involvement activities 5 days Mon 2/8/10 Fri 2/12/10
13 Prepare & organize workshops 10 days Wed 1/27/10 Tue 2/9/10
14 Team meeting 1 day Wed 2/10/10 Wed 2/10/10
15 Staff meeting 1 day Thu 2/11/10 Thu 2/11/10
16 DAC meeting 1 day Fri 2/12/10 Fri 2/12/10
17 Task 3 - Preliminary analysis 90 days Mon 1/4/10 Fri 5/7/10
18 Workshop #1 1 day Wed 3/17/10 Wed 3/17/10
19 Walking tour #1 1 day Thu 3/18/10 Thu 3/18/10
20 Website updates / Newsletter #1 1 day Fri 3/19/10 Fri 3/19/10
21 Team Meeting 1 day Mon 4/26/10 Mon 4/26/10
22 Staff Meeting 1 day Tue 4/27/10 Tue 4/27/10
23 DAC meeting 1 day Wed 4/28/10 Wed 4/28/10
24 Task 4 - Specialized Studies 40 days Mon 3/15/10 Fri 5/7/10
25 Workshop #2 1 day Wed 4/14/10 Wed 4/14/10
26 Group & individual interviews 1 day Thu 4/15/10 Thu 4/15/10
27 Website updates / Newsletter #2 1 day Fri 4/16/10 Fri 4/16/10
28 Team Meeting 1 day Mon 4/26/10 Mon 4/26/10
29 Staff Meeting 1 day Tue 4/27/10 Tue 4/27/10
30 DAC meeting 1 day Wed 4/28/10 Wed 4/28/10
31 Task #5 Evaluation of Streetscape Components 60 days Mon 5/10/10 Fri 7/30/10
32 Workshop #3 -Mini- Charrette 1 day Wed 6/9/10 Wed 6/9/10
33 Walking tour #2 1 day Thu 6/10/10 Thu 6/10/10
34 Group & individual interviews 1 day Fri 6/11/10 Fri 6/11/10
35 Website updates / Newsletter #3 1 day Mon 6/14/10 Mon 6/14/10
36 Team Meeting 1 day Wed 6/23/10 Wed 6/23/10
37 Staff Meeting 1 day Thu 6/24/10 Thu 6/24/10
38 DAC meeting 1 day Fri 6/25/10 Fri 6/25/10
39 City Council Hearing #1 1 day Mon 7/19/10 Mon 7/19/10
40 Task #6 - Draft & Final Plan 44 days Mon 8/2/10 Thu 9/30/10
41 Workshop #4 1 day Wed 8/18/10 Wed 8/18/10
42 Website updates / Newsletter #4 1 day Thu 8/19/10 Thu 8/19/10
43 Workshop #5 1 day Wed 8/25/10 Wed 8/25/10
44 Website updates / Newsletter #5 1 day Thu 8/26/10 Thu 8/26/10
45 Team Meeting 1 day Tue 8/31/10 Tue 8/31/10
46 Staff Meeting 1 day Wed 9/1/10 Wed 9/1/10
47 DAC meeting 1 day Thu 9/2/10 Thu 9/2/10
48 City Council Hearing #2 1 day Mon 9/20/10 Mon 9/20/10
49 Final website update / Final newsletter 1 day Mon 9/27/10 Mon 9/27/10
Section 5/1
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE CONTINUED
Doyle Street Greenway & Streetscapes
Emeryville, California
Section 5/2
REFERENCES
SF Design Center
Berry Campbell
Bay West Group
2 Henry Adams
Suite M-17
San Francisco, California 94103
415-490-5840
bcampbell@sfdesigncenter.com
Capitol Avenue
Christine Daniel
City of Fremont - Office of the City Manager
3300 Capitol Avenue
Building A
Fremont, California 94538
510-284-4060
Section 6/1
SMITH+SMITH PROFESSIONALS
Bill Smith, Design Principal
Education:
As the President of SMITH+SMITH, Bill is responsible for strategic
Master of Landscape
master planning, planning and landscape architectural design, Architecture,
emphasizing conceptual, schematic and design development Graduate School of Design
phases. Bill’s creativity, vision, and skills as multitalented Harvard University
landscape designer and planner have been demonstrated on
many projects throughout his thirty-five year career. His ability to Bachelor of Science
School of Natural Resources,
create unique solutions and ideas satisfy clients’ requirements for
Department of Resource
innovative, modern, or traditional landscape architectural styles –
Economics
makes design versitility the firm’s hallmark. University of Vermont
Professional Registration:
We are licensed by the State
of California, License LA 2310/
LA 2671 and in other states,
(Hawaii #8322, Massachusetts
#570, Rhode Island #123,
Utah# 6318946-5301).
Affiliations:
ASLA – American Society of
Landscape Architects
AIA – American Institute of
Architect
ULI – Urban Land Institute
CLARB – The Council of
Landscape Architectural
Registration Boards
SMITH+SMITH PROFESSIONALS
Ned Smith, Principal
Education:
For 40 years, Ned has overseen the development of technical
Master of Landscape
design from initial conception through project completion, Architecture,
while establishing relative budgetary opinions and identifying Graduate School of Design
constructability issues early on in the project. With nearly forty Harvard University
years of experience, Ned has an extensive planting vocabulary
and award-winning designs, which complement his knowledge Bachelor of Science in
Landscape Architecture,
of engineering and construction methods. He also brings a solid
Associate in Engineering
background in technical programming, cost analysis, and a
Pennsylvania State University
detailed understanding of sensitive environmental locations.
Professional Registration:
We are licensed by the State
of California, License LA 2310/
LA 2671 and in other states,
(Hawaii #8322, Massachusetts
#570, Rhode Island #123,
Utah# 6318946-5301).
SMITH+SMITH PROFESSIONALS
King Leong, Principal
Education:
King performs all aspects of landscape architectural design.
Bachelor of Science in
His project management experience includes a diverse mix of Landscape Architecture
distinguished projects in most market sectors. He has extensive Michigan State University
experience overseeing large project teams to get complex
projects built, on time and within budget. With over 25 years Certificate in Practice
of experience, King adds invaluable mentoring and staff Management
Advanced Management
development experience to the SMITH+SMITH team. He adeptly
Institute
leads project managers and designers to delivering exceptional,
customer-focused design services. Professional Registration:
We are licensed by the State
of California, License LA 2310/
LA 2671 and in other states,
(Hawaii #8322, Massachusetts
#570, Rhode Island #123,
Utah# 6318946-5301).
SMITH+SMITH PROFESSIONALS
Jason Milam, Project Manager
Education:
Jason brings 9 years of versatile professional landscape
Bachelor of Science in
architecture design and extensive technical knowledge of detail Landscape Architecture
project design. He has had key roles in notable Bay Area projects (cum laude)
and he has collaborated in all project design phases, from University of Georgia
programming through construction administration. Jason’s design
and documentation experience encompasses public, residential, Professional Registration:
We are licensed by the State
commercial, civic, and educational projects. He is a leader in
of California, License LA 2310/
computer landscape architectural design applications.
LA 2671 and in other states,
(Hawaii #8322, Massachusetts
#570, Rhode Island #123,
Utah# 6318946-5301).
ILS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Robert A. Day, PLS, Vice President of Land Surveying
Professional Registration:
Mr. Day has over fourty-two years of diverse experience in the
Licensed Land Surveyor,
practice of land surveying, working with both public and private State of California
sector clients. He has been with the firm since 1999. Mr. Day
currently manages the firm’s survey department, providing overall
direction and coordination of individual field crews and survey Education:
staff. He is extremely well-versed in leading and performing Certificate of Completion,
Surveying & Mapping
boundary, right-of-way, topographic, ALTA and construction
International Correspondence
staking surveys, and in conducting title and boundary research.
School
He has also served as Expert Witness and participated in
numerous traffic accident surveys. Mr. Day has developed Associates Degree in History
expertise in the operation of many types of electronic survey University of California,
equipment, and manages the production of topographic mapping Berkeley
in the office utilizing state-of-the-art CAD software.
Affiliations:
Member, California Land
Surveyors Association
Affiliations:
Member, California Land
Surveyor’s Association
ILS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Irving L. Schwartz, CE, President & CEO
Professional Registration:
Mr. Schwartz combines over forty-four years of private and public
Professional Civil Engineer,
sector civil and transportation engineering and land surveying State of California
experience working with owners, developers, builders and public
agencies. Mr. Schwartz has been with the firm since its formation
in 1981. He has specific expertise in land development, planning Education:
and engineering, and has developed a reputation for successfully Bachelor of Science
Civil Engineering
guiding projects of varying size and scope through the often
California State University,
complex regulatory process unique to Northern
San Jose
California. assessment districts.
As principal of the firm, Mr. Schwartz also serves as chief quality Affiliations:
control officer, with direct oversight of all projects produced Fellow, American Society of
within the office. Civil Engineers
Richard is a long time member of The Urban Land Institute where B.A. Design/Fine Arts
Indiana University
he has most recently developed and taught a comprehensive
Bloomington, Indiana
workshop on Marketing Real Estate. He sits on the Community
Development Council, has participated in plan analysis sessions
and is a speaker at other ULI workshops and seminars. He is a
recipient of design and communications awards from all major
design competitions.
LAK ASSOCIATES, LLC
Larry Kennings, Planning Consultant
Affiliations:
Larry Kennings began his 43-year professional planning career in
Urban Land Institute, Public/
1966, while a student in the University of California’s College of Private Partnership Council
Environmental Design. He has participated in over twenty specific American Society of
plan projects in California and Arizona. His professional experience Landscape Architects,
includes both private and public section land use planning for new American Planning Association
communities, recreational facilities, commercial business parks International Association of
Public Participation, Founding
and large-scale environmental planning projects. His extensive
Director, Treasurer
experience includes managing large multidisciplinary planning
Lambda Alpha International
teams. In addition to his land use planning and design skills, he Richmond Art Center Board of
is experienced in planning and facilitating public involvement Directors, President 1998-1999
programs, particularly for controversial projects. Professional College of Environmental
Experience includes: Design Alumni Association,
Board of Directors
LAK Associates, LLC, Sausalito, CA, 2000-present. University of California,
Skyypark Town Center Plan, Scotts Valley, CA Founding Director, President
East Garrison Specific Plan/Monterey County 1991-1995
Franklin Canyon Specific Plan/Contra Costa County Architectural Advisory
Kings Beach Commercial Core Streetscape Plan/Lake Tahoe Committee, Mill
Richmond Bay Trail Master Plan/Richmond, CA Valley, CA., 1978-1980,
Rubicon Trail Master Plan Public Involvement Program/ Chairman-1979-1980
El Dorado County, CA Advisory Committee, U.S.
Marin Country Club Master Plan Entitlements/ Novato, CA Bureau of the Census,
Yolo County Fairgrounds Master Plan/Woodland, CA Housing Element, 1978-1980,
Alameda County Fairground Master Plan/Pleasanton, CA Chairman-1980
Fairfax Downtown Plan, Fairfax Housing Element/Fairfax, CA
Forest Green Estates Master Plan Entitlements/Richmond, CA Oakview Education:
Master Plan/Marin County, CA Master of City Planning
East Sacramento County Open Space Plan and Public Involvement Program Harvard University
Owens Corning Pt. Richmond Facility Entitlement Project/ Graduate School of Design
Richmond, CA Cambridge, MA
Sausalito Marine Central Waterfront Master Plan and Public Participation
Workshops Graduate Studies in Film
Enron Wind Turbine Study Public Participation Program/Solano Co., CA Making
Fairfax General Plan Update Public Involvement Program/Fairfax University of Hawaii, Honolulu
Marina Bay Business Plaza Entitlements (Brownfield)
Sudden Oak Death Project/Marin County Bachelor of Landscape
Magnolia Place Master Plan/Petaluma, CA Architecture
Milk Farm Policy Plan/Dixon, CA College of Environmental
The Reserve Business Campus at Spanos Park West Master Plan/ Design
Stockton, CA University of California,
Atchison Village Master Plan/Richmond, CA Berkeley, CA
Elsie N. Gridley Wetlands Mitigation Bank/Solano Co., CA
Smith Property at Albion River Master Plan/Mendocino Co., CA
LAK ASSOCIATES, LLC
Sean Kennings, Planning Consultant
Affiliations:
Sean Kennings has worked in both the public and private sectors
Urban Land Institute,
and has experience in large-scale master planning projects.
Associate member
Recently, Sean managed the Tentative Map application for the 120
unit Forest Green Estates Subdivision in Richmond, CA. In 2001 he American Planning
prepared a conceptual master plan for the new community at the Association, member
tenth University of California campus in Merced County, and an Harvard Urban Planning
open space plan for 50 square miles of east Sacramento County. Organization, member
Berkeley Community-Based
Transportation Plan*,
Berkeley, CA
Oakland Community-Based
Transportation Plan*,
Oakland, CA
Education:
Master of City and Regional
Planning Degree Candidate,
University of California at
Berkeley
Master of Landscape
Architecture, University of
California at Berkeley
Bachelor of Arts in
Environmental Studies,
Minor in Music, University of
California at Santa Barbara,
Affiliations:
Fellow, American Society of
Civil Engineers
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) – Member
W-TRANS
Allan G. Tilton, TE
Professional Registration:
W-Trans provides traffic engineering and transportation planning
Professional Engineer in
services with goals of maximizing mobility within available California: Traffic Engineer –
resources and transforming streets to serve all potential Certificate No. 1215
users. W-Trans focus is on balancing the technical needs and
functionality of traffic with the desire of communities to create
more livable streets and sustainable transportation systems. Education:
B.S. in Civil Engineering
California Polytechnic State
TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE
University
Traffic Signal Design, Construction and System Management San Luis Obispo
Traffic Collision Database/GIS
Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety
Traffic Demand Modeling Affiliations:
Advanced Technology Applications Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) – Fellow
Roundabout Planning, Design and Construction
Staff Services
Neighborhood Traffic Management
Development of Standards
Traffic Impact Studies
W-TRANS
Joshua S. Abrams
Education:
W-Trans provides traffic engineering and transportation planning
B.A. in Environmental Studies
services with goals of maximizing mobility within available and Planning
resources and transforming streets to serve all potential (Double Emphasis)
users. W-Trans focus is on balancing the technical needs and Sonoma State University
functionality of traffic with the desire of communities to create
more livable streets and sustainable transportation systems.
Affiliations:
American Planning Association
TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE
(APA) – Member
Transportation Planning
Sonoma County Transportation Authority Countywide Bicycle and Institute of Transportation
Pedestrian Master Plan Engineers (ITE) – Member
Solano Comprehensive Transportation Plan; Alternative Modes
Element Association of Pedestrian and
Bicycle Professionals (APBP)
City of Healdsburg Foss Creek Path Study
Wilson Avenue Circulation Plan, Vallejo, CA
Napa Rail Trail Design Study
Solano Countywide Bicycle Plan
Sausalito Bicycle Master Plan
Solano Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Tulare County Association of Governments Countywide Bicycle
Transportation Plan
Yolo-Solano BikeLinks Map, Update 1, 2, 3, & 4
Santa Rosa Creek Bike Path Environmental Assessment,
Santa Rosa, CA
Central County Bikeway Design Study
Simi Valley Bicycle Transportation Plan
Calabasas Trails Master Plan
RALPH OSTERLING CONSULTANTS, INC.
Walter Fujii, Consulting Staff Arborist
Professional Registration:
Walter Fujii’s extensive background in both horticulture and
Registered Consulting Arborist
arboriculture began in 1974 as a plant propagator and grower. No. 402 (American Society of
Consulting Arborists)
Mr. Fujii joined Ralph Osterling Consultants, Inc. in 2001 as the
Staff Consulting Arborist. He often prepares tree assessments and Certified Arborist No. WE
inventories to provide cost-effective protection, preservation or 2257A (International Society
of Arboriculture)
restoration measures for mature trees.
Yosemite Lodge
Redevelopment
Yosemite National Park,
California