Implementation of MIMO-OFDM Using Adaptive Modulation Detection With Different Modulation Techniques

International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Engineering (IJETE)
Volume 1 Issue 5, June 2014, ISSN 2348 8050

121
www.ijete.org
Implementation of MIMO-OFDM Using Adaptive Modulation
Detection with Different Modulation Techniques
Varun Sharma* HemantDalal**
*M.Tech Scholar, CBS Group of Institutions, Jhajjar
**Asst. Prof. ECE Deptt.,CBS Group of Institutions, Jhajjar
ABSTRACT
In next generation wireless communication system
high data rates, better quality of service and higher
network capacity is required by many applications.
The combination of MIMO with OFDM is a solution
to achieve above objectives for next generation
network operating in frequency selective fading
environment. The AMUD MIMO-OFDM system
employs adaptive receivers to achieve better
performance in computational complexity ,bit error
rate(BER) and capacity.AMUD MIMO-OFDM
perform better compared to non-adaptive MIMO-
OFDM at low SNR.In this paper simulation results are
obtained for SISO-OFDM,MIMO-OFDM and AMUD
MIMO-OFDM for 2*2,3*3 and 4*4 antennas. Also
capacity and BER results are obtained for different
antenna configuration and different modulation
techniques for SISO-OFDM, MIMO-OFDM and
AMUD MIMO-OFDM.The simulation results shows
that AMUD MIMO-OFDM performs better when
compared to SISO-OFDM and MIMO-OFDM in terms
of BER AND SNR.
Keywords: AMUD, BER, MIMO, OFDM, SNR
1. INTRODUCTION
As MIMO-OFDM system offers high spectral
efficiency, high data rates, improve link reliability and
superior tolerance to multipath fading, increased
diversity gain or enhance system capacity. MIMO
channels increase system capacity. In OFDM, the
entire channel is divided into many narrow parallel sub
channels or sub carriers. In OFDM FFT is used to
transmit data in parallel over a large number of
orthogonal subcarriers. Throughput and capacity can
be improved when multiple antennas are applied to
transmitter and receiver side in frequency selective
fading channels. Multiuser detection method side steps
the need for high precision power control in mobile
communication method. Thus an increase in the
complexity of the base stations enables a reduction in
the complexity of the mobile transmitters.AMUD
designed for total elimination of MAI in the system by
demodulation of digitally modulated signals. The
AMUD MIMO-OFDM technique has good
performance in terms of BER, SNR and capacity in
Rayleigh channel. By doing AMUD in mobile
communication one can easily get network wherever
he goes because of regular handover. By using
multiuser detection in MIMO-OFDM channel capacity
increase due to orthogonally property of OFDM.Also
it mitigates the effect of multiple access interference.
In OFDM system, Doppler shift caused frequency shift
which results in ICI that degrades the BER
performance of system greatly. Similarly, MIMO-
OFDM is also sensitive to Doppler shift which causes
ICI.To reduce the effect of ICI adaptive filters are used
in this scheme. .
2. SYSTEM STRUCTURE FOR AMUD
MIMO-OFM
Fig. 1 is the system model for AMUD MIMO OFDM,
with Nt and Nr transmit and receive antennas with k
sub-carrier in one OFDM block .At time t,a data block
b[n,k]:k=0,1n transformed into different signals
x1[n;k]:k=0,1,,k-and I = 1,2,..,n and i =
1,2,..n and i are numbers of sub channels of OFDM
system. Signals transmitted are modulated by x1[n,k].
3. CHANNEL CAPACITY
MIMO system consist of multiple transmit and receive
antenna.MIMO channel capacity increases linearly
with the no. of transmit antennas, provided that no. of
receive antenna is equal to no. of transmit antennas
.Assume M RX and N TX antennas. The expression
for MIMO capacity in bits/sec/Hz is given by
C =log2 [Im + (/)HH] b/s/hz
Where C is system capacity. H is the M * N channel
matrix, Im denotes the identity matrix of size M and is
122
www.ijete.org
the average signal to-noise ratio(SNR) at each receiver
branch.
The elements of H are complex Gaussian with zero
mean and unit variance. OFDM ensures a narrowband
channel by splitting the wideband channel into N
parallel sub-channels. Each sub channel is orthogonal
to the others and lies on a different subcarrier. In
OFDM the capacity formula for MIMO-OFDM is
given by the expression
m
C=[ log(1+/)est] b/s/hz
=1
Where est is the complex transpose and is an
estimate of the capacity. / is SNR.The capacity
formula for adaptive multi-user detection is given as:
C=log(1/
2
) where
2
is the noise variance of the
signal at the receiver.
Fig 1 System Model (AMUD MIMO-OFDM)
.
4. PERFORMANCE AND SIMULATION
RESULTS
The simulation parameters chosen are shown in
TABLE 1.
Table 1 Simulation Parameters
Parameters Value
Antenna Numbers(Nt,Nr) 2,3,4
Modulation BPSK,M-ary
QAM,M-ary PSK
Carrier Frequency 7.6 GHz
SNR 14db
Simulation are carried out for SISO-OFDM, MIMO-
OFDM and AMUD MIMO-OFDM for Nt=Nr=2,3,4.
The performance is calculated in terms of Bit Error
Rate (BER) versus the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR).
We analyze the BER performance of data transmission
for BPSK, M-ary PSK and M-ary QAM in Matlab
software.Fig. 2 shows the Capacity vs. SNR
comparison of SISO and MIMO-OFDM and AMUD
MIMO-OFDM for 4 transmit and receive antennas
which show that capacity of AMUD MIMO-OFDM is
better than SISO, MIMO-OFDM.F.When we use other
modulation technique like QPSK,M-ary PSK and M-
ary QAM than it can be analyzed that the capacity of
the system increases with increase in number of
antenna.
Fig 3 and Fig 4shows the SNR in dB versus the BER
of SISO, MIMO-OFDM and AMUD MIMO-OFDM
forNt=Nr=2,3 by using BPSK modulation technique. If
we increase the number of transmit and receive
antenna the BER ofAMUD MIMO-OFDM decreases
in comparison to SISO, MIMO-OFDM at 14 db. It
shows that the AMUD MIMO-OFDM has better
performance in terms of BER as the number of
antennas increases. Fig5 ,Fig 6 and Fig 7 shows SNR
vs. BER for other modulation techniques like 16-ary
QAM,16-ary PSK and 64-ary PSK by using different
number of antenna configuration in wireless
communication system. Simulation results are shown
below:
Fig. 2 Capacity vs SNR comparison of SISO and
MIMO-OFDM and AMUD MIMO-OFDM for 4
transmit and receive antennas.
Fig. 3 BER performance of SISO, MIMO-OFDM and
AMUD MIMO-OFDM for Nt=Nr=2 by using BPSK
122
www.ijete.org
branch.
m
=1
C=log(1/
2
) where
2
.
RESULTS
TABLE 1.
Parameters Value
QAM,M-ary PSK
SNR 14db
antenna.
below:
122
www.ijete.org
branch.
m
=1
C=log(1/
2
) where
2
.
RESULTS
TABLE 1.
Parameters Value
QAM,M-ary PSK
SNR 14db
antenna.
below:
123
www.ijete.org
Fig. 4 BER Performance of SISO,MIMO-OFDM and
AMUD MIMO-OFDM for Nt=Nr=3 by using BPS
Fig. 5 BER performance of SISO,MIMO-OFDM and
AMUD MIMO-OFDM for Nt=Nr=2 by using16-ary
QAM
PSK
Fig. 7 BER performance of SISO,MIMO-OFDM
and AMUD MIMO-OFDMfor Nt=Nr=3 by using
64-ary PSK
The capacity analysis with different modulation
techniques with SNR is listed in table below-
Table 2 SNR and capacity for different modulation
techniques
Modulation
Technique
SNR Capacity(bits/sec/hz)
BPSK 60db 19
QPSK 60db 20
8-QAM 60db 30
16-QAM 60db 40
Through all of the graphs we analyzed that the BPSK
modulation gives the least bit error rate, means it is an
effective method for data transmission in all of the
modulations and for all the channels in terms of bit
error rate. If SNR of 20db is considered SISO has a
channel capacity of 6bits/sec/hz,MIMO-OFDM for
Nt=Nr=4 has a channel capacity of
19bits/sec/hz,AMUD MIMO-OFDM has a channel
capacity of 20bits/sec/hz.
5. CONCLUSION
The MIMO-OFDM technology presented in this paper
involves for use of AMUD which enhance system
performance in wireless communication system. The
capacity and BER of three cases (SISO-OFDM,
MIMO-OFDM, AMUD MIMO-OFDM) were
compared using different transmit and receive
123
www.ijete.org
QAM
PSK
64-ary PSK
techniques
Modulation
Technique
BPSK 60db 19
QPSK 60db 20
8-QAM 60db 30
16-QAM 60db 40
5. CONCLUSION
123
www.ijete.org
QAM
PSK
64-ary PSK
techniques
Modulation
Technique
BPSK 60db 19
QPSK 60db 20
8-QAM 60db 30
16-QAM 60db 40
5. CONCLUSION
124
www.ijete.org
antennas and found that capacity of AMUD MIMO-
OFDM were high than SISO-OFDM and MIMO-
OFDM system. Simulation results show that AMUD
MIMO-OFDM performs more efficiently than SISO-
OFDM and MIMO-OFDM.Therefore AMUD MIMO-
OFDM is a promising technique for further wireless
communications. It is also shown that as number of
antennas increases AMUD MIMO-OFDM perform
better in terms of Bit Error Rate. Further work can be
extended with different higher order modulation
techniques.
REFERENCES
[1]. Bhasker Gupta, Gagan Gupta, and Davinder S.
Saini, BER Performance Improvement in OFDM
System with ZFE and MMSE Equalizers, IEEE
Communications Letters, vol.-6, no.,pp. 193-197,
April 2011.
[2]. D. Gesbert, M. Shafi, Da-shanShiu, P. J. Smith, A.
Naguib, From theory to practice: an overview of
MIMO space-time coded wireless systems, Selected
Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal, vol.-21, pp.
281 -302, April 2003.
[3]. M. Jiang and L. Hanzo, Multiuser MIMO-OFDM
for next generation wireless systems, In Proceedings
of IEEE, vol.-95, Issue 7, pp. 1430-1469, July 2007.
[4]. Kuixi Chen, Jihua Lu, Bo Yang, Zhilun Li and
Zibin Zhang, Performance Analysis of an OFDM
Transmission System Based on IEEE802.11a IEEE
Communications Letters, pp. 1-6, Oct. 2011.
[5]. Tian-Ming Ma, Yu-Song Shi, and Ying-Guan
Wang, A Low Complexity MMSE for OFDM
Systems over Frequency-Selective Fading Channels,
IEEE Communications Letters, vol.-16, no.-3, March
2012.
[6]. Allert van Zelst and Tim C. W. Schenk,
Implementation of a MIMO OFDM-Based Wireless
LAN System, IEEE Transaction on Signal
Processing, vol.-52, Issue 2, pp. 483-494, February
2004.
[7]. MitaleeAgrawal and YudhishthirRaut, BER
Analysis of MIMO OFDM System for AWGN &
Rayleigh Fading Channel, International Journal of

Implementation of MIMO-OFDM Using Adaptive Modulation Detection With Different Modulation Techniques

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Implementation of MIMO-OFDM Using Adaptive Modulation Detection With Different Modulation Techniques

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Engineering (IJETE)

Volume 1 Issue 5, June 2014, ISSN 2348 8050

You might also like