Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2008/04/porn_and_abuse
It’s always seemed logical to me that porn use could affect the
sexual behaviour of the user. After all, there’s a reason companies
spend billions on advertising. We learn about the world, about
standards of behavour, about norms and values, through what we
see and hear as we grow up, and if someone grows up using porn,
that is where they are going to gain much of their understanding of
sex from. If, like me, you grow up without directly accessing porn,
you may well learn a lot about sex from experiences with someone
who did. And in today’s culture, even if both partners grow up
without watching porn, the porn industry’s influence is growing: the
images of women on lads’ mags covers in your local newsagent, the
trend in ripping out all your pubic hair, thongs for tweenies, women
performing stripper moves in music videos, the list goes on.
If it wasn’t for porn, would this guy** (and many more, if you read the
comments thread) think it was fine and dandy to shoot off in a
woman’s face without so much as a by your leave? Would some
guys think ejaculating on a woman’s body is similarly bog standard,
no-need-to-ask-first behaviour? Would so many young women think
sex with a guy requires preremoval of all body hair? Or fake orgasm
noises?
Yes, many of the messages mainstream porn sends out have been
around for centuries: the dominant male/passive female motif being
a prime example. Porn has not necessarily singlehandedly created
these messages. But it does a mighty fine job of disseminating
them. So, to say that porn has no influence whatsoever on our
sexualities, the expectations we have of sex and of our sexual
partners, seems pretty naive to me.
Yes, rape and abuse and the hurting and humiliation of women are
not necessarily a product of porn use. Not all porn users will rape
and abuse women, and those that do may not do so as a direct
consequence of porn use, or by reenacting what they see in porn. (I
think many will hurt and humiliate women, intentionally or not,
because of the way in which sex and gender roles are portrayed in
much porn - see that thread at Jezebel).
But, in the light of cases like the one above, I really don’t think it’s so
crazy to suggest that porn use in our patriarchal society - a society
where women are portrayed as sexual objects for male pleasure,
where rape can’t happen if she was wearing that, or said yes to that,
or drank that, where men have a biological “need” to access
women’s bodies - can in some cases encourage and lead to the
abuse and rape of women. It sadly makes a lot of sense.
**http://jezebel.com/gossip/how-porn-ruined-sex/how-about-you-
dont-ask-to-come-on-my-face-on-the-first-date-333148.php
***http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=7114&page=0
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=7032
Even excluding file sharing and credit card sites, these boys would
have encountered no problems in finding the pornography they were
looking for. In fact, they might have been surprised at the range of
things they could see men doing to women. For free they could have
seen pictures of men pulling women’s hair while anally penetrating
them, grabbing women around their necks while orally penetrating
them, or ejaculating on women’s faces while slapping them. Or they
could have seen a whole group of men clawing a lone naked
woman.
Advertisement
What are women to think of the fact that our male leaders over the
next decades might have had significant exposure to pornography
from a young age?