The latest digital subscriber line (DSL) standard being developed - G.fast. Uses 106MHz of phone wire spectrum to deliver gigabit broadband. Comes at the cost of greater signal attenuation and crosstalk.
The latest digital subscriber line (DSL) standard being developed - G.fast. Uses 106MHz of phone wire spectrum to deliver gigabit broadband. Comes at the cost of greater signal attenuation and crosstalk.
The latest digital subscriber line (DSL) standard being developed - G.fast. Uses 106MHz of phone wire spectrum to deliver gigabit broadband. Comes at the cost of greater signal attenuation and crosstalk.
service, the role of the telephone wire continues to be refashioned. The latest digital subscriber line (DSL) standard being developed G.fast uses 106MHz of phone wire spectrum to deliver gigabit broadband, a far cry from its original purpose of carrying a 3kHz voice call. The developments (see fg 1) complement fbre getting ever closer to the home. G.fasts 106MHz spectrum compares to 17MHz used for VDSL2, the current leading DSL standard. But this comes at the cost of greater signal attenuation and crosstalk. Signal attenuation is a result of the phone wires limited spectrum. Greater attenuation at higher frequencies cuts the distance over which data can be sent: VDSL2 operates over 1500m, while G.fast will typically be up to 250m. Cutting the crosstalk Crosstalk describes the signal leakage between copper pairs in a cable that can hold tens or hundreds of wire pairs. The leakage means each pair not only carries the sent signal, but also noise; the sum of all the leakages from neighbouring DSL pairs. Crosstalk increases with frequency and early G.fast trials by Alcatel- Lucent showed crosstalk was so severe at higher frequencies that the interference matched the strength of the received signal. Its one reason why no one has developed G.fast technology until now, said Dudi Baum, CEO of Israeli start up Sckipio. Vectoring, which tackles crosstalk by using noise cancellation, is already used with VDSL2. Vectoring is considered a key aspect of G.fast, even more than for VDSL2, said Paul Spruyt, DSL strategist for fxed networks, Alcatel-Lucent. While G.fast is viewed as an extension to VDSL2, it has clear differences. VDSL2 uses frequency division duplexing where data transmission is continuous upstream (from the home) and downstream but on different frequency bands or tones. In contrast, G.fast uses time division duplexing, where the full spectrum is used alternatively to send or receive data. If a cable carries both VDSL2 and G.fast services, G.fast will use frequencies of more than 17MHz to avoid overlapping with VDSL2; crosstalk between the two cannot be cancelled because of the different duplexing schemes. Operators want G.fast to deliver aggregate data rates ranging from 150Mbit/s over 250m to 1Gbit/s over cable lengths of less than 100m (see fg 2). This compares to VDSL2s aggregate data rate of 70Mbit/s (50Mbit/s downstream, 20Mbit/s upstream) over 400m, a rate that doubles to 140Mbit/s with vectoring. Vectoring works by measuring the crosstalk coupling on each line before the DSLAM the platform at the cabinet or the fbre distribution point unit for G.fast generating anti-noise to null each lines crosstalk. The crosstalk coupling between the pairs is estimated using modulated sync symbols sent between data transmissions. A users DSL modem expects to see the modulated sync symbol but, in reality, receives the symbol and crosstalk from modulated sync symbols transmitted on neighbouring lines. The modem measures the crosstalk and sends the value back to the DSLAM. This correlates the received error values on the victim line with the pilot sequences transmitted on all other disturber lines and measures the crosstalk coupling for every disturber-victim pair. Anti-noise is generated and injected into the victim line on top of the signal to cancel the crosstalk; a process repeated for each line. G.fast vectoring is, however, more complicated than VDSL2s. Besides the greater crosstalk, G.fast has a power saving mode in which the line is deactivated if no data is sent. The vectoring algorithm needs to stop generating anti-noise as soon as a line is deactivated and to respond DSL technology is developing to the point where data might soon be delivered to the home at 1Gbit/s over copper pairs. By Roy Rubenstein. In G.fast trials conducted in Austria, the use of vectoring allowed data rates of 500Mbit/s to be reached over 100m of copper cables www.newelectronics.co.uk 25 March 2014 Its down to the wire 33 COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN NEXT GENERATION COMMUNICATIONS 1995 2000 2005 2010 Beyond 2020.... D a t a
r a t e
( M b i t / s ) ADSL ADSL2 ADSL2plus VDSL(2) 8b VDSL(2) 17a + bonding + vectoring + Phantom the gap + G.fast Fibre to the home Fig 1: How innovations in copper have supported fibre roll out 1000 500 100 50 100 50 1 25 March 2014 www.newelectronics.co.uk rapidly once it restarts. VDSL2 modem lines also get deactivated, but far less frequently. The number of computations is proportional to the square of the number of lines, said Spruyt. For G.fast, the number of lines is 4 to 24, or even 48, since the distribution point unit is closer to homes (see fg 3). For VDSL2, 200 or even 400 pairs are possible. Both DSL technologies use discrete multitones, but G.fast uses half the number 2048 of VDSL2s, with each tone 12 times broader in frequency. G.fasts symbol rate, related to the tone spacing, is 12 times faster, requiring the calculations to be performed a dozen times more quickly. Since crosstalk cancellation is required for each tone and there are half the number of tones, G.fasts calculation rate is six times that of VDSL2 for the same number of lines. Thus, while G.fast vectoring is more complicated, the overall computation load and power consumption are lower, due to fewer DSL lines. In contrast, G.fasts analogue front end requires much faster A/D and D/A converters due to the 106MHz bandwidth, upping the power consumption. We should expect the frst generation of G.fast to consume more power than VDSL2 silicon, said Spruyt. The main functional blocks for G.fast and VDSL2 include the baseband DSP, vectoring, the analogue front end and the line driver. The degree to which they are integrated whether one chip, or four if the home gateway functions are included depends on where they are used. The chipsets will be designed differently for the different segments where they are used, said Arun Hiremath, director of marketing for Ikanos Communications. For example, the G.fast modem could be implemented as a single chip the baseband, home gateway and even the line driver, due to the short transmission lengths, he says. Products have yet to appear Ikanos has yet to disclose G.fast silicon, but has announced its Neos development platform, allowing its customers to test and trial the technology. Hiremath says its G.fast silicon will be based on the Neos architecture, with samples expected later this year. Neither has Sckipio revealed its G.fast chipsets, but it is expecting frst samples. We will provide more information in a few months, said Baum. The start up has ported its RTL design onto a Cadence Palladium system and has DSL models bundles of twisted copper pairs to test its designs performance. We use those models to see the expected performance running our protocol over those wires, said Baum. Alcatel-Lucent has its own vectoring know-how for VDSL2 and G.fast. Having our own vectoring technology means we have our own vectoring processing, said Stefaan Vanhastel, marketing director for fxed networks, Alcatel-Lucent. Alcatel-Lucent has conducted G.fast trials with A1, the home subsidiary of Telekom Austria. Over 100m, G.fast only achieved 60Mbit/s, due to crosstalk. Activating G.fast vectoring saw it rise to 500Mbit/s, almost a factor of 10, said Vanhastel. Much work is still to be done before G.fast will be deployed, says Alcatel-Lucent. The ITU is only likely approve the G.fast PHY specifcation later this year, while there are interoperability, test, functionality and performance specifcations still to be written by the Broadband Forum. Sckipio is more upbeat about timescales, believing operators will start deployments in 2015. Operators have to respond to broadband competition from cable players and operators deploying fbre, says Baum. Sckipio has multiple feld trials of its G.fast silicon planned this year. Both companies might be right, said Hiremath. For G.fast, you need fbre closer to your house to get a gigabit and that is not available with most carriers. G.fast will start with small scale deployments, he says, but the carriers will wait a little more for things to mature. It is hoped that G.fast will support data rates of 1Gbit/s over distances of less than 100m. However, this will require the use of vectoring 2.0, which reduces the effect of crosstalk significantly 34 COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN NEXT GENERATION COMMUNICATIONS Fig 2: G.fast will require Vectoring 2.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 A g g r g a t e d
d a t a
r a t e
( M b i t / s ) Loop length (m) G.fast full FEXT Crosstalk G.fast single line (17.7 to 106MHz) G.fast vectored FEXT: far end crosstalk cancellation 800 600 400 200 0 Fig 3: A fibre to the distribution point architecture 1 to 48 users per remote network equipment Distribution point unit Passive splitter 60V DC Aggregation Customer premises equipment Vectored VDSL2: 200Mbit/s G.fast: up to 1Gbit/s G.fast transceiver Power extraction Power insertion DPU power supply Power source G.fast transceiver