BRANCH 5 JOYCE ANN S. CAPITO, Plaintif, -versus- Civi C!se N". #$%5&' F"r( C"e)*i"+ ", Su- ", M"+e. FELI/ R. ESGUERRA, Defendant. 0---------------------------------------------------0 MOTION TO 1ISMISS Comes now, defendant, Felix R. Esguerra, by the undersigned counsel, and to this Honorable Court, most respectfully move for the dismissal of the above- captioned case upon the sole ground that this honorable court has no urisdiction over the person of the defendant. 1ISCUSSION
Rule !" of the Rules of Court provides the di#erent modes by which service of summons may be made on a particular defendant. $uch modes must be complied with because the manner in which service of summons should be e#ected is SUMMONS 2AS NOT SER3E1 UPON 1EFEN1ANT AS MAN1ATE1 BY THE RULES, HENCE, THIS HONORABLE COURT HAS NO JURIS1ICTION O3ER THE PERSON OF THE 1EFEN1ANT. urisdictional in character and its proper observance is what dictates the court%s ability to ta&e cogni'ance of the litigation before it. (here the defendant is an individual, $ection ) and *, Rule !" of the Rules of Court speci+cally provides the ordinary modes in which service of summons may be made, thus, -$ec. ). Service in person on defendant - (henever practicable, the summons shall be served by handing a copy thereof to the defendant in person, or, if he refuses to receive and sign for it, by tendering it to him.. -$ection *. $ubstituted $ervice. / 0f, for usti+able causes, the defendant cannot be served within a reasonable time as provided in the preceding section, service may be e#ected 1a2 by leaving copies of the summons at the defendants residence with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein, or 1b2 by leaving copies at defendant%s o3ce or regular place of business with some competent person in charge thereof.. 4s may be gleaned from the foregoing, the general rule is that summons must be served to the defendant in person. 0t is only when the defendant cannot be served personally within a reasonable time and for usti+able reasons that substituted service may be made. 0mpossiblity of prompt service should also be shown state the e#orts made to +nd the defendant personally and the fact that such e#orts failed. $trict compliance with the re5uirements of substituted service is re5uired. 6nder the controlling decisions, the statutory re5uirements of substituted service must be followed strictly, faithfully and fully, and any substituted service other than by the statute is considered ine#ective. 7his is necessary because substituted service is in derogation of the usual method of service8 it is a method extraordinary in character8 and hence, may be used only as prescribed and in the circumstances authori'ed in the statute. 0n the case at bar, there was no showing that a copy of summons was either given personally to the defendant or left at the defendant%s residence or regular place of business. 7here being no service of summons upon defendant Felix R. Esguerra in accordance with the re5uirement of the rules, it follows that this Honorable Court has not ac5uired urisdiction over said defendant%s person. RELIEF (HEREF9RE, defendants respectfully pray that the herein complaint be ordered dismissed on the ground of lac& of urisdiction over the person of the defendant. 9ther relief, ust and e5uitable are also prayed for. :ay ;<, ;<!", =amboanga City NEIL GABRIEL A. BALTAZAR Counsel for >efendant ?@: Auilding, Beterans 4venue =amboanga City 0A? Co. "*<)<)D<!-!"-<)D:@?? ?7R Co. !"*E!<*D<!-!"-<)D:a&ati R9@@ Co. F*GH! C9?I F6RC0$HE> ATTY. GERAR1 PETER C. MARIANO Counsel for ?lainti# " th Floor CJB Auilding, !<G 4guirre $treet @egaspi Billage, :a&ati City C970CE 9F HE4R0CK 7he Honorable Court :7C =amboanga City, Aranch H 477I. KER4R> ?E7ER C. :4R04C9 Counsel for the ?lainti# ?lease ta&e notice that the foregoing motion will be submitted, and is re5uested to be submitted, for the consideration and approval of the Honorable Court on ;H :ay ;<!" at !,F< p.m. or soon thereafter as matter and counsel may be heard on notice. NEIL GABRIEL A. BALTAZAR EL?@4C4709C 9C $ERB0CE AI REK0$7ERE> :40@ >efendant, by counsel, respectfully manifests that due to lac& of managerial personnel, time constraint and the distance involved, a copy of the foregoing :otion to >ismiss was served via registered mail in accordance with Rule !F of the Revised Rules of Civil ?rocedure. NEIL GABRIEL A. BALTAZAR