Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Snippets of Physics
16. Lagrange has (more than) a Point!
T Padmanabhan
A so lu tio n to th e 3 -b o d y p ro b le m in g r a v ity , d u e
to L a g ra n g e , h a s se v e ra l re m a rk a b le fe a tu re s. In
p a rtic u la r, it d e sc rib e s a situ a tio n in w h ich a p a r -
tic le , lo c a te d a t th e m a x im a o f a p o te n tia l, c a n
r e m a in sta b le a g a in st sm a ll p e rtu rb a tio n s.
T Padmanabhan works at
IUCAA, Pune and is
M o tio n o f b o d ies u n d er th eir m u tu a l g rav ita tio n a l a t-
interested in all areas tra ctio n is o f h isto rica l, th eoretica l a n d ev en p ra ctica l
of theoretical physics, (th a n k s to th e sp a ce-a g e a n d sa tellites) im p o rta n ce. T h e
especially those which sim p lest ca se o f tw o b o d ies { co rresp o n d in g to th e so -
have something to do with
ca lled K ep ler p ro b lem { a lread y p o ssesses sev era l in ter-
gravity.
estin g fea tu res, lik e th e ex isten ce o f a n ex tra in teg ra l a n d
th e fa ct th a t th e tra jecto ry o f th e p a rticle in th e v elo c-
ity sp a ce is a circle (see, fo r ex a m p le, [1 ]). T h e situ a tio n
b eco m es m o re in terestin g , b u t a lso terrib ly co m p lica ted ,
w h en w e a d d a th ird p a rticle to th e fray. T h e 3 -b o d y
p ro b lem , a s it is ca lled , h a s attra cted th e a tten tio n o f
sev era l d y n a m icists a n d a stro n o m ers b u t, u n fo rtu n a tely,
it d o es n o t p o ssess a clo sed solu tio n .
W h en a n ex a ct p ro b lem ca n n o t b e so lv ed , p h y sicists
lo o k a ro u n d fo r a sim p ler v ersio n o f th e p ro b lem w h ich
w ill a t lea st ca p tu re so m e featu res o f th e o rig in a l o n e.
O n e su ch ca se co rresp o n d s to w h a t is k n ow n a s th e re-
stricted three-body problem w h ich co u ld b e d escrib ed a s
fo llow s. C o n sid er tw o p a rticles o f m a sses m 1 a n d m 2
w h ich o rb it a ro u n d th eir co m m o n cen tre o f m a ss, ex -
a ctly a s in th e ca se o f th e sta n d a rd K ep ler p ro b lem . W e
n ow co n sid er a th ird p a rticle of m a ss m 3 w ith m 3 ¿ m 1
a n d m 3 ¿ m 2 w h ich is m ov in g in th e g rav ita tio n a l ¯ eld
Keywords o f th e tw o p a rticles m 1 a n d m 2 . S in ce it is fa r less m a s-
Classical mechanics, gravita- siv e th a n th e o th er tw o p a rticles, w e w ill a ssu m e th a t
tion, rotation. it b eh av es lik e a test p a rticle a n d d o es n o t a ® ect th e
G (m 1 + m 2)
!2 = : (1 )
a3
G (m 1 + m 2) £ 3 ¤ G (m 1 + m 2)
(r 1 + r 23 )r + (r 23 ¡ r 13 )q = r:
2 r 13 r 23 a3
(6 )
r1 = r2 = a : (7 )
a n d th e m o tio n co n ¯ n ed to th e x { y p la n e.
M ea su rin g a ll m a sses in term s o f th e to ta l m a ss m 1 + m 2 ,
w e ca n d en o te th e sm a ller m a ss b y ¹ a n d th e la rg er b y
(1 ¡ ¹ ). S im ila rly, w e w ill m easu re a ll d ista n ces in term s
o f th e sep a ra tio n a b etw een th e tw o p rim a ry m a sses a n d
ch o o se th e u n it o f tim e su ch th a t ! = 1 . (If th ese a p p ea r
stra n g e fo r y o u , ju st w rite d ow n th e eq u a tio n s in n o rm a l
u n its a n d re-sca le th em ; su ch trick s a re w o rth lea rn in g .)
T h e p o sitio n o f m 3 is (x ;y ) a n d r 1 a n d r 2 w ill d en o te
th e (sca la r) d ista n ces to m 3 fro m th e m a sses (1 ¡ ¹ ) a n d
¹ resp ectiv ely. (N o te th a t th ese a re n ot th e d ista n ces
to m 3 fro m th e o rig in .) It is n ow ea sy to see th a t th e
eq u a tio n s o f m o tio n in (3 ) red u ce to th e set:
@© @©
xÄ ¡ 2 y_ = ¡ ; yÄ + 2 x_ = ¡ ; (8 )
@x @y
w h ere
1 2 (1 ¡ ¹ ) ¹
© = ¡ (x + y 2 ) ¡ ¡ (9 )
2 r1 r2
is th e e® ectiv e p o ten tia l in th e ro ta tin g fra m e w h ich
in clu d es a term fro m th e cen trifu g a l fo rce. T h e o n ly
k n ow n in teg ra l o f m o tio n is th e ra th er o b v io u s o n e co rre-
sp o n d in g to th e en erg y fu n ction (1 = 2 )v 2 + © = co n sta n t.
A little th o u g h t sh ow s th a t r © = 0 a t L 4 a n d L 5 , co n -
¯ rm in g th e ex isten ce o f a sta tio n a ry so lu tio n . T o stu d y
th e sta b ility, w e n o rm a lly w ou ld h av e ch eck ed w h eth er
th ese co rresp o n d to m a x im a o r m in im a o f th e p o ten tia l.
A s w e sh a ll see (F igu re 1 ), it tu rn s o u t th a t L 4 a n d L 5
a ctu a lly co rresp o n d to m a x im a , so if th a t is th e w h o le
sto ry L 4 a n d L 5 sh o u ld b e u n sta b le.
B u t, o f co u rse, th a t is n o t th e w h o le sto ry sin ce w e
n eed to ta k e in to a cco u n t th e C o rio lis fo rce term co r-
resp o n d in g to (2 y_;¡ 2 x_) in (8 ). T o see th e e® ect o f
th is term clea rly, w e w ill ta k e th e C o rio lis fo rce term
to b e (C y_;¡ C x_) so th a t th e rea l p ro b lem co rresp o n d s
to C = 2 . B u t th is trick a llow s u s to stu d y th e sta b ility
fo r a n y va lu e o f C , in p a rticu la r fo r C = 0 , to see w h a t
h a p p en s if th ere is n o C o rio lis fo rce. W e n ow h av e to d o
a T ay lo r series ex p a n sio n o f th e term s in (8 ) in th e fo rm
x (t) = x 0 + ¢ x (t); y (t) = y 0 + ¢ y (t) w h ere th e p o in t
(x 0 ;y 0 ) co rresp o n d s to th e L 5 p o in t w ith y 0 > 0 . W e a lso
n eed to ex p a n d © u p to q u a d ra tic o rd er in ¢ x a n d ¢ y
to g et th e eq u a tio n s g ov ern in g th e sm a ll p ertu rb a tio n s
a ro u n d th e eq u ilib riu m p o sitio n . T h is is stra ig h tfo rw a rd
b u t a b it ted io u s. If y o u w o rk it th ro u g h , y o u w ill g et
th e eq u a tio n s
à p !
d2 3 3 3 d
2
¢ x = ¢ x + (1 ¡ 2 ¹ ) ¢ y + C ¢ y ;
dt 4 4 dt
(1 0 )
à p !
d2 9 3 3 d
2
¢ y = ¢ y+ (1 ¡ 2 ¹ ) ¢ x ¡ C ¢ x : (1 1 )
dt 4 4 dt
To prove that forces match at L 5 , we need to show that the component of the gravitational
force along L 5 D due to the mass ¹ is balanced by the component of the gravitational force
along L 5 E due to the mass (1 ¡ ¹ ) . This leads to the condition ¹ (1 ¡ ¹ ) l = (1 ¡ ¹ ) ¹ l
which is true. (While taking cosines and sines of angles, recall that the equilateral
triangle has unit side. ) Next consider the component of the force along L 5 C. The sum
of the two gravitational forces along L 5 C is given by ¹ x + (1 ¡ ¹ ) (x + y ) which should
balance the outward centrifugal force equal to the length of L 5 C, viz., x + y (1 ¡ ¹ ) . Since
¹ x + (1 ¡ ¹ ) (x + y ) = x + y (1 ¡ ¹ ) , we are again through with the proof. This proves that
one can achieve force balance in the equilateral con¯guration for any value of ¹ . The
fact that C divides AB in the inverse ration of the masses is, of course, crucial.
Figure A