Heinrich Himmler

Heinrich Luitpold Himmler (1900-1945) was Reichsfhrer of the Schutzstaffel (SS), a military
commander and leading member of the Nazi Party in Germany during the 1930s and World War II.
Adolph Hitler later appointed him Commander of the Replacement (Home) Army and General
Plenipotentiary for the entire Reich's administration (Generalbevollmchtigter fr die Verwaltung).
Himmler was one of the most powerful men in Nazi Germany and one of the most directly responsible for
executing people of Jewish faith by the millions, The Holocaust.

Q: Herr Himmler, if this is all right with you; thank you for coming.
HH: It is quite all right this form of address, in German, of the life to which we will relate.

Q: Your immediate superior is probably the only person considered more responsible for The
Holocaust than yourself and I imagine knowledgeable observers and historians might consider you the
leader.
HH: Either view is accurate; we both played equally horrible roles in the process.

Q: What was your personal role, your spiritual mission if this applied and were these carried out?
HH: Yes, they were achieved. I do understand this sounds disgusting, to speak of murder on such scale
as an achievement. My personal role was as it evolved.

Q: I would guess this was the worst case in the history of humanity.
HH: From the Earth view, yes, one of the worst. The ancient battle of Armageddon was similar in
effect, if lesser in numbers.

Q: Why?
HH: Intensity; deadly combat often is. The forces, fear and emotions reach a level of stress, fear and
force even worse.

Q: Why were you willing to carry out such acts and how were you successful convincing others to
follow, as you did follow yourself, your one "superior" if Adolf Hilter can be called that?
HH: I can say from my place and view, it was a grand life plan and scheme that drove all participants
to act. I was not successful as that is usually understood; the appeal for others was the same as mine. Lust
for power.

Q: Did you consider the eventual consequences? What I am curious to know is why the Nazi regime
and you as a key architect of its many atrocities, pushed forward so forcefully despite the rapid response
and development of conflict in the Pacific. Did you and your fellow killers believe no such counter effort
or attack would come your way?
HH: No, we did not, to the intensity it did. We believed the Japanese overreached and provoked a
difficult adversary, creating a wildly dangerous enemy. We believed we were more savvy and calculating.
We knew resistance and counterattack against Nazi Germany were likely and we calculated it would be
resisted by us successfully.

Q: Did the failure of the Russian incursion turn the tide, as was seen inside the Nazi regime leaders?
HH: No; we knew it had drained our abilities yet we remained confident of our ability to rebound.

Q: Why?
HH: The Russians would not invade Germany; they were interested in defense of their sovereignty.
We believed British concern for New Zealand would supply sufficient distraction, given the Japanese
desire to invade and seize control of that land. We miscalculated the cohesion of the English speaking
peoples. We closely observed the United States' efforts to repel Japan and remove them from the smaller
possessions seized.

Q: The British never made any serious effort to defend New Zealand.
HH: It was not needed; the USA's war efforts in the Pacific saw to it Japanese imperialism would fail.

Q: At what point did you concede to yourself that all was lost?
HH: This was not until the very end; the problem was confidence. The string of successes Nazi
Germany achieved as it marched across Europe bolstered our confidence beyond the pragmatic view.

Q: Had Japan not acted against the USA in a surprise attack, how would this have changed things in
Europe?
HH: It would have hastened the downfall of the Nazi regime.

Q: Have you been confronted by your many victims?
HH: Yes.

Q: Have you received forgiveness?
HH: From many, yes. This is the Jewish way, and we can say Hebrew faith strongly aligns with true
spirituality in this sense. I caution against misinterpretation that I could imply other faiths or beliefs are
not supporters and believers in forgiveness; for these exist also. I only wish to say it is equally strong and
represented in the Jewish faith.

Q: What was the objective?
HH: Exactly as history portrays it; to create an enemy group around which offense could be justified.

Q: Was there ever a moment in the rise of the Third Reich where extermination of Jews was not
seriously considered?
HH: No; the Fhrer's need to dominate always included this step.

Q: What discussions took place between you and your victims?
HH: These I will not discuss, as I am certain you will appreciate.

Q: In the absence of linear time, what alternate courses of events could be possible and how do they
compare to history as Nazi Germany rose and fell?
HH: The course chosen was the worst of all options, yet we now see, from our place in Heaven ours
and your home, the greatest benefit from it was had, the best lesson for mankind was achieved through
this extreme of the worst.

Q: Can you describe the lesson?
HH: It supplied the worst extreme of duality, the countering forces of positive and beneficial against
evil and horror. The contrasts are stark.

Q: Have you incarnated again on Earth?
HH: No; this was my last lifetime planned on Earth.

Q: Did many victims also choose torture and execution as was done to them?
HH: Yes.

Q: It is disgusting for us to believe a victim of such unspeakable horror selected it.
HH: Yes, the very reason for its selection. The experience and opportunity is rare and unique in the
universe. Earth is a truly challenging and risky place.

Q: What about innocent victims, those who perished in the Holocaust that did not choose it?
HH: This was the worst part and yet these victims were the first to forgive the acts of murder and
torture put forth by our hands.

Q: Did you ever consider abandoning the war effort, did you feel remorse at any time before your
death?
HH: No; I was numbed and insulated from the effects of this. I did briefly feel a small portion or
sample of the fear instilled in victims, as my death approached.

Q: Can you tell us what reactions were seen from our visitor friends and cousins from other planets,
whom I assume observed the Second World War in all detail?
HH: This was the worst; the horror of the emerging picture was complete and understood and far
worse this made it, for them. The ending of the war in Japan was the low point for extraterrestrial
observers, who recalled equally horrific episodes from development on their own planets of their home
stars.

Q: What reaction in Heaven has there been to this war and conflicts that follow it?
HH: The principal feature of mass conflict, the Korean War and Vietnam after the European Wars
combined with more recent, by Earth time, Middle East conflicts, is to provide knowledge that the
arriving age for Earth will be that much better and advanced by comparison. The contrasts are not
apparent on Earth, not yet and therefore, not understood because of the recognition not yet given.

Q: What message for humanity does this experience offer us, we who dwell on Earth now?
HH: Disagreement and dissent must be encouraged and accepted. These are essential, as this is the
way of the universe. It has always been too common to react to the abhorrent idea or abrasive suggestion
with negativity. This is not the way forward.

There is no time in a linear fashion; existence and events are circular and parallel, simultaneously. There
is no forward away from Earth, yet it is a certainty upon it. The certainty of forward requires the real
illusion of permanent consequence and within this view, there has to be inclusion of divergence. The new
idea is too often offered and suggested with a requirement, often powerfully unspoken yet omnipresent,
that its consideration requires disposal of an idea once prevailing. The established idea must be thrown
away, it is often seen.

This is not the way; there is always room for both. Many ideas coexist, as do all things. You must allow
your white neighbor to hate blacks if you are to have the same ability to form disagreement. Dislike
requires the offer of a better idea; denial of an idea will not kill it. Its acceptance destroys it; the better
way will prevail the quickest, as all ideas are shown equal light and space, as they are chosen and offered.

I wish to emphasize your permanent ability to accept or reject; your valuation of an idea must give this
ability to the one you do not like, for you to have it also.

Q: Your ideas and life as Heinrich Himmler was not this way.
HH: No, it was the opposite and the results are well known.

Q: What would you say to criticism of Jews and Israeli policy today?
HH: If you disagree, put on the shoes of a threatened Israeli as you offer your criticism. Ask them to
wear your shoes as they respond. Humanity dislikes this; too often perceiving it as weakness. It is not;
true strength is confidence to accept.

Q: Did the massive wars and death of the Twentieth Century have to happen?
HH: No, they did not. These were Earth choices.

Q: Did the use of nuclear warheads at the end of World War Two represent a final straw of sorts,
from the view of Heaven?
HH: Yes; you have noted the great proliferation of these weapons since then yet no similar use has
ever been undertaken. We have ensured these weapons will never be used.

Q: Herr Himmler, what message for humanity do you have now, what would you like to say to us on
Earth in this month of July in our year of 2013?
HH: I wish to apologize to the souls whose lives were cut short by my acts and to the souls of their
children who were not born unto Earth by the killing of their parents. The opportunity for learning and
growth I seized from your existence, by my horrific human acts, will be repaid by me in the best way I am
able. I can say to you on Earth the descendants of Holocaust victims, both the dead and survivors who are
very few now by comparison to the middle 1940s of your calendar, you have indeed survived and
blossomed and gained great understanding. I wish to say many souls who were not born as they might
have been, have nevertheless found a way to Earth and you also live where you do now. This is some
small consolation to my regret, guilt and remorse. Your lives are not an excuse or a pardon in anyway,
and my acts are not dismissed by your presence on Earth, which you do not know is because of this, but I
ask all of you who read these words to know, these great and brave souls are among you. This adds a
unique aspect to what already is, that is all.

I wish to say, look forward with confident vigilance and love for your fellow human; challenge and
change there will always be, and there will be more before there is less in the months and years to come.
Seek the love and compassion in all people by offering it yourself, and be ever vigilant for your well
being and safety. It is not wrong to prepare yourself for defense, only to misuse your ability. Inside
yourself the love you have to offer will ensure you remain confident and safe, ever adored in the glory of
your Heavenly soul and your existence.

Be well, all of you.

Q: Mr. Himmler thank you.
HH: My humble honor.

Comments
Lori 07/28/2013 11:18am

Wow...I'm not sure what I expected, possibly an old black/white movie version of the man. What I got was
a strong picture of Earth/life shown to be the intense classroom that it is. Not explaining it at all well.
Thank you, Patrick, Thank you committee........ and all those souls who are willing to be put forth for
ignorant human scrutinization to try and teach/provide us real truth


Mike 07/29/2013 2:02am

In a past life visit I found out I was General Wilhelm Reinhard. None to proud of that.