Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VD
PD
P4. In that study, the surface temperature was as-
sumed to be equal to that of the medium (e.g. innite Biot
number-Bi). Incropera and DeWitt (1996) also reported
that a nite cylinder can be approximated as an innite
one as long as the length to radius ratio is greater than
10, e.g.
VD
PD
> 5. These innite geometry assumptions have
been widely used to simplify the heat and mass transfer
problems without any restriction.
Rovedo and Viollaz (2000) attempted to determine a
VD
PD
value to assume a nite slab as an innite one at Bi number
of 0.1 and 100. According to their results, a nite slab can
not be considered as an innite one even for a
VD
PD
value of
20, and the relative error obtained with this assumption
increased as the Fourier number (Fo) increased, and it was
dierent at Bi number of 0.1 and 100.
Recently, Turhan and Erdogdu (2003, 2004) reported
that the error due to approximating a nite geometry as
an innite one changed with Fo and Bi numbers indicating
that the innite geometry assumptions may not be accurate
by just considering the ratio of the dimensions, e.g.
VD
PD
.
In these previous works, only temperature changes were
considered in heat transfer problems for innite geometry
assumptions. On the other hand, in case of heat treatment
of foods, changes due to temperature may also be more
important than the temperature change itself. For example,
rather than a temperature reached for a given process time,
an ideal thermal process should give a certain sterilization
Notation
a geometrical constant in Eq. (15)
Bi Biot number
hd
k
D D-value (min)
Fo Fourier number
at
d
2
1
n1
2 sink
n
k
n
sink
n
cosk
n
cos k
n
x
L
_ _
expk
2
n
Fo
_ _
6
where k is given by
Bi k tank 7
Innite cylinder
w
T T
1
T
i
T
1
1
n1
2
k
n
J
1
k
n
J
2
0
k
n
J
2
1
k
n
J
0
k
n
r
R
_ _
expk
2
n
Fo
_ _
8
where k is given by
Bi k
J
1
k
J
0
k
9
where k is thermal conductivity (W/m K), h is heat transfer
coecient (W/m
2
K), L is half thickness of the innite slab
(m), and R is radius of the innite cylinder (m).
Using the super imposition technique, the solutions for a
nite cylinder and a nite slab can be given as
T T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
finite
plate
T T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
infinite
plate;depth
T T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
infinite
plate;width
T T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
infinite
plate;height
10
T T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
finite
cylinder
T T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
infinite
cylinder
T T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
infinite
plate
11
Then, these solutions are easily used to determine the un-
steady-state temperature changes of 13 dimensional
geometries.
In the solution of Eqs. (6), (8), (10), and (11), 150 roots
of Eqs. (5) and (7) were applied since the number of roots
that should be used especially when Fo < 0.2 was an impor-
tant matter to make these solutions as error-free as possible
at any time and geometry combination (Turhan &
Erdogdu, 2003).
3.2. Determination of sterilization value (SV)
Sterilization value (SV) at a center point of certain
geometry was determined using Eq. (12) for a given process
time:
F
_
t
0
10
TctT
ref
z
_ _
dt 12
where T
ref
is the reference temperature (121.1 C), z is the
z-value of Clostridium botulinum (z = 10 C (Singh &
Heldman, 2001)), T
c
is the center temperature change of
the given geometry. Change in T
c
values was determined
applying Eqs. (6) and (8) for innite plate and innite cyl-
inder cases while Eqs. (10) and (11) were applied for a nite
slab and nite cylinder, respectively.
3.3. Determination of process times
To determine the process times, Eqs. (13) and (14) were
solved for the temperature ratio (TR = 0.1) and the steril-
ization value (SV; F
0
= 2.4 min) approaches by applying
the analytical solutions of innite plate, innite cylinder
and innite rod using a simple bisection optimization
procedure.
T
c
t T
1
T
i
T
1
_ _
0:1 0 13
_
t
0
10
TctT
ref
z
dt
_ _
2:4 0 14
where T
c
is the change in center temperature of a given ref-
erence geometry.
All calculations in this study were performed using a
computer program written in Microsoft Visual Basic V.
6.0 (Microsoft Corporation, 1984).
4. Results and discussion
Required process times for the temperature ratio (TR)
and sterilization value (SV) approaches were determined
and used in the study. Tables 1 and 2 show the process
times for the reference geometries where the center TR is
0.10 and the center SV is 2.4 min, respectively.
Using the process times given in Tables 1 and 2, the
center TR and SV changes for cylindrical rod, square
rod, circular slab and rectangular slab geometries were
determined to obtain IAR (the
VD
PD
ratio required to make
innite geometry assumption). In these calculations, VDs
were changed as explained above while PDs were held con-
stant. The changes in IAR values in rod group (cylindrical
and square rods) and slab group (circular and rectangular
slabs) geometries were independent of PD (Table 3). The
IAR values were same within the groups (rod and slab
groups) but dierent between the groups at a given Bi num-
ber. The TR and SV approaches also resulted in the same
IAR values, and IAR decreased with increasing Bi number
for all geometries (Table 3). This nding is important since
the TR approach was using only a temperature value
reached after a certain period of time while the SV
approach used the temperature history at the center of
the given geometry for this period of time.
Fig. 2 gives the IAR values for rod and slab group
geometries at Bi number of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100. The
change of IAR versus Bi number for both rod and slab
groups decreased exponentially for Bi 6 10 and remained
constant for Bi > 10 (Fig. 2). As seen in Fig. 2, for
Bi > 10, a nite rod was found to be assumed as an innite
one as long as IAR P4, which was used as ve by Farid
and Abdul Ghani (2004) based on Incropera and DeWitt
(1996). This value was determined to be four by Olson
and Schultz (1942) without any restriction. However, when
Bi 6 10, the IAR value was higher as seen in Fig. 2 (e.g. 8
for Bi = 1, 16 for Bi = 0.1, etc.). In the case of slab geom-
etries, the behavior of IAR versus Bi number was similar.
Bi = 10 was again the limiting value, but the
VD
PD
value of
eight was required to make the innite slab assumption
for Bi > 10.
The lumped system approach assumes that the tempera-
ture distribution in a solid body is uniform for Bi 6 0.1
(Incropera & DeWitt, 1996). According the ndings of this
work, the IAR was aected by Bi for Bi 6 0.1 (Fig. 2)
pointing the existence of a temperature prole within the
body. This behavior suggests a detailed investigation of
the lumped system assumption.
As seen in Table 3 and Fig. 2, the dimensional ratio
VD
PD
had been doubled (from PD 2
0
to PD 2
n
mm,
n = 1, 2, . . . , 1) with Bi number of 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10.
Therefore, the IAR values were determined to be more
than enough to make an innite geometry assumption.
This enabled the IAR value be as independent of the size
of the geometries (Table 3).
The change of IAR versus Bi number was regressed for
Bi 6 10. The following exponential equation perfectly t-
ted the data obtained from the given analytical solutions
at Bi numbers of 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 for both rod and slab
group geometries with <0.005% deviation (Fig. 2):
IAR 2 a Bi
0:30103
for 0:01 6 Bi 6 10 15
where a is the geometrical constant which gives the value of
IAR for Bi > 10 that is four for rod and eight for slab
group geometries. When the results of Eq. (15) were com-
pared with the analytical data obtained at dierent Bi num-
bers within 0.0110, the results were also in perfect
agreement with <0.005% deviation for both rod and slab
group geometries. The comparison pointed that the given
equation (Eq. (15)) can also be used to practically deter-
mine the IAR value at any Bi number within 0.0110.
The IAR values were always higher in the slab group
geometries than the rod group geometries that is obviously
due to the higher volume to surface area ratio (characteris-
tic dimension) in the rod group geometries. Obtaining
Table 2
Process times (min) for the reference geometries of innite slab, innite cylinder and innite rod for the sterilization value (SV) to be 2.4 min
Reference geometry Principle dimension (PD; mm) Biot number (Bi)
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Innite slab (2L) 2 35.51 6.69 2.99 2.62 2.59
5 165.30 25.04 6.02 3.77 3.56
10 551.22 78.14 15.53 7.73 6.95
20 1872.06 256.11 46.98 21.35 18.73
40 6425.09 861.84 152.28 66.75 58.00
Innite cylinder (R) 2 62.85 10.55 3.52 2.80 2.74
5 300.89 43.69 9.12 4.88 4.49
10 1013.85 140.36 25.91 11.76 10.39
20 3464.13 467.30 81.87 35.08 30.50
40 11929.32 1586.91 271.80 114.30 98.72
Innite rod (2L 2L) 2 2 20.46 4.59 2.70 2.52 2.50
5 5 91.56 14.72 4.29 3.13 3.02
10 10 301.22 44.10 9.60 5.29 4.85
20 20 1015.09 141.79 27.54 13.20 11.68
40 40 3468.70 472.40 87.54 39.96 34.87
Table 1
Process times (min) for the reference geometries of innite slab, innite cylinder and innite rod for the center temperature ratio (TR) to be 0.10
Reference geometry Principle dimension (PD; mm) Biot number (Bi)
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Innite slab (2L) 2 26.16 2.71 0.37 0.14 0.12
5 163.52 16.95 2.31 0.88 0.74
10 654.09 67.79 9.23 3.51 2.98
20 2616.37 271.16 36.92 14.05 11.90
40 10465.49 1084.65 147.69 56.21 47.61
Innite cylinder (R) 2 52.30 5.49 0.71 0.26 0.22
5 326.87 33.74 4.47 1.64 1.38
10 1307.49 134.97 17.87 6.56 5.54
20 5229.95 539.90 71.50 26.22 22.15
40 20919.80 2159.60 285.98 104.90 88.59
Innite rod (2L 2L) 2 2 13.09 1.37 0.19 0.077 0.065
5 5 81.82 8.53 1.21 0.48 0.41
10 10 327.37 34.13 4.83 1.92 1.63
20 20 1309.08 136.52 19.32 7.67 6.52
40 40 5236.31 546.07 77.29 30.68 26.06
Table 3
The change in innite assumption ratio (IAR) values in rod group (cylindrical and square rods) and slab group (circular and rectangular slabs) geometries
for the temperature ratio (TR) and sterilization value (SV) approaches with respect to principal dimension (PD) and Biot number (Bi)
Geometries PD (mm) Biot Number (Bi)
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
TR SV TR SV TR SV TR SV TR SV
Cylindrical rod 2 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
5 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
10 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
20 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
40 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
Square rod 2 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
5 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
10 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
20 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
40 32 32 16 16 8 8 4 4 4 4
Circular slab 2 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
5 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
10 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
20 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
40 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
Rectangular slab 2 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
5 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
10 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
20 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
40 64 64 32 32 16 16 8 8 8 8
0
8
16
24
32
40
48
56
64
72
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Bi
I
A
R
Slab Group Geometries, a=8
Rod Group Geometries, a=4
0. 30103
2 IAR a Bi = . .
Fig. 2. IAR (innite assumption ratio) changes versus Biot number (Bi) for the rod (cylindrical and square) and slab (cylindrical and rectangular) group
geometries (broken lines give the t of Eq. (15)).
smaller IARvalues in rod geometries at the same Bi number
also agreed with the results of a previous work (Turhan &
Erdogdu, 2004). In this work, it was concluded that, at
the same conditions (same Bi and Fo numbers), the errors
due to innite geometry assumption in slab geometries were
higher than the corresponding errors in rod geometries.
5. Conclusions and suggestions
The results of this study showed that the IAR (the
VD
PD
ratio required to make the innite geometry assumption)
in conduction-heated regular solid rod and slab geometries
was a function of Bi number. For diusional mass transfer
problems in solids, it is expected to obtain the same results
for the given geometries since the same analytical solutions
will hold. In the previous works of Turhan and Erdogdu
(2003, 2004), the errors associated with assuming a nite
slab and rod geometry as an innite one during an unstea-
dy-state heat/mass transfer processes were determined as a
function of Fo and Bi numbers. However, this study has
given the required
VD
PD
value to assume a nite slab or rod
geometry as an innite one at a given Bi number. It has
been also shown that the accepted ratio of P4 for the in-
nite cylinder and square rod cases was not always correct
(Olson & Schultz, 1942; Incropera & DeWitt, 1996).
Fig. 2 or Eq. (15), to determine the IAR value for rod
and slab group geometries at a known Bi number, can be
used together with the commonly used Heisler charts
(Heisler, 1947) to determine the temperature/mass concen-
tration change in regular rod and slab geometries.
The phase change phenomenon (freezing, thawing, dry-
ing, etc.) is very common during food processing opera-
tions aecting the heat transfer. Therefore, validity of the
innite geometry assumptions should be investigated for
these processes to determine the temperature changes dur-
ing phase change phenomenon applying the required
numerical solutions for dierent cases.
References
Farid, M., & Abdul Ghani, A. G. (2004). A new computational technique
for the estimation of sterilization time in canned food. Chemical
Engineering and Processing, 43, 523531.
Heisler, M. P. (1947). Temperature charts for induction and constant-
temperature heating. Transactions of ASME, 69, 227236.
Incropera, F. B., & DeWitt, D. B. (1996). Fundamentals of heat and
mass transfer (4th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 226
229.
Microsoft Corporation. (1984). Visual Basic Professional, Version 6.0.
Redmond, WA.
Olson, F. C. W., & Schultz, O. T. (1942). Temperatures in solids during
heating or cooling. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 34(7),
874877.
Rovedo, C. O., & Viollaz, P. E. (2000). Drying of solids: the innite slab
condition. Drying Technology, 18, 10071021.
Singh, R. P., & Heldman, D. R. (2001). Introduction to food engineering
(3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Turhan, M., & Erdogdu, F. (2003). Error associated with assuming a nite
regular geometry as an innite one for modeling of transient heat and
mass transfer processes. Journal of Food Engineering, 59, 291
296.
Turhan, M., & Erdogdu, F. (2004). Errors based on location and volume
average changes in innite geometry assumptions in heat and mass
transfer processes. Journal of Food Engineering, 64, 199206.