Cryptology and Data Secrecy : The Vernam Cipher

There is only one perfectly secure cryptosystem known

Of all the methods of encryption ever devised, only one has been mathematically
proved to be completely secure. It is called the Vernam cipher or one-time pad.
The worth of all other ciphers is based on computational security. If a cipher is
computationally secure this means the probability of cracking the encryption key
using current computational technology and algorithms within a reasonable time is
supposedly extremely small, yet not impossible. In theory, every cryptographic
algorithm except for the Vernam cipher can be broken given enough ciphertext
and time.
For example the public key cryptosystems such as PGP and RSA are based on
the following :
Calculate an integer N such that it has only two prime number factors f1 and f2.
This triad of integers forms the basis of the encryption and decryption keys used
in PK cryptosystems. The security of these systems is simply based on the
computational difficulty of calculating f2 and f1 from N if N is a very large integer.
To break this cipher N must be factored, and at the time these systems were
devised the best publicly available factoring algorithms would take millions of
years to factor a 200 digit number. This does not logically exclude the possibility of
a new factoring algorithm being discovered, or the existence of a secret factoring
algorithm, or the invention of technology capable of running current factoring
algorithms at high speed.
(Please also click here to view RFC1750 - "Randomness
recommendations for security")
Computationally secure cryptosystems ?
The use of public key cryptosystems has become commonplace, yet should their
widespread presence in itself lead to an unquestioning trust of the security of data
encrypted using these methods? How do you know the cryptosystem you use is
actually safe? Do you understand how it works? Do you think if a Government or
military intelligence institution had a method of breaking cryptosystems they would
announce this fact? Though the security of cryptosystems should be a matter of
importance to anyone with a healthy mistrust of those drawn to positions of power
it is of particular relevance to those activists and dissidents operating within a
society ruled by oppressive governments, dictators or power elites. The
interception and decryption of personal communications can literally be a matter of
life or death to these individuals.
As a result of work on a new form of computational technology known as the
quantum computer a factorisation algorithm now exists to factor giant integers in
The only unbreakable cryptosystem known - the Vernam cipher http://www.pro-technix.com/information/crypto/pages/vernam_...
1 of 7 01/07/2014 6:14 PM
linear time. This was devised in 1994 by Peter Shor from AT&T's Bell Laboratories.
A quantum factorisation engine running Shor's algorithm could factor a one
hundred digit integer in few thousand arithmetic operations, which might well take
only a matter of minutes. Anyone with access to such a machine would easily be
able to read any intercepted message encrypted using a pubic key cryptosystem.
Prototype quantum computers are already operational ( see the Scientific
American article on the NMR quantum computer and this introduction to quantum
computing).
This article contains information on a hardware implementation of a scalable matrix
inversion on time area optimised (SMITH) cryptanalysis device.
Follow this link for the paper "Randomness and the Netscape Browser" by Ian
Goldberg and David Wagner describing their attack on the security of this browser.
This article provides an excellent introduction to the dangers of using deterministic
processes when generating encryption keys.
Finally, for those of you wishing to still place your faith in the experts I recommend
reading about the Data Encryption Standard (DES), the EEF DES cracker
machine, and a possible secret backdoor found within a encryption standard from
the NSA.
The Vernam cipher or one-time pad.
Cryptology is such a complex specialist subject that there seems no choice but to
place your trust in a few individuals with sufficient knowledge to grasp the
underlying principles of supposedly secure cryptosystems. However
understanding the operation of the Vernam cipher is not demanding. Its perfect
security is intuitively obvious.
Using the Vernam cipher
In 1917 during the First World War the American scientist Gilbert Vernam was
given the task of inventing an encryption method the Germans could not break by
AT&T. What was devised was the only provably unbreakable encryption scheme
known to this day. Compared with most cryptosystems it is a very simple. To use a
one-time pad, you need 2 copies of the "pad" ( also known as the key ) which is a
block of truly random data at least as long as the message you wish to encode. If
the data on the pad is not truly random, the security of the pad is compromised.
One-time pads are used in pairs. The more copies of a given pad, the greater the
likelihood is that one may be captured, in which case the message encrypted by
the pad will be compromised. One copy of the pad is kept by each user, and pads
must be exchanged via a secure channel (e.g. face to face on disks or USB keys).
Pads must only be used once.
The fastest method of encrypting and decrypting a message with a one-time pad
is with a computer. If you do choose this method keep the pad on a USB key, CD
or DVD and destroy it completely once used. Supposedly deleted data can be
The only unbreakable cryptosystem known - the Vernam cipher http://www.pro-technix.com/information/crypto/pages/vernam_...
2 of 7 01/07/2014 6:14 PM
retrieved and reconstructed from storage media, so never store pads on your hard
drive or keep the medium holding the pad one it has been used. The message
recipient should apply the same precautions. Using a networked computer for
implementing the encryption/decryption should be avoided because of possible
eavesdropping.
A computer simplifies the process because the message and pad are encoded in
binary. Each character is represented internally by a computer as a unique
combination of zeros and ones called bits, for example the letter 'b' is composed
of the eight bits '1100010'. This binary number is 98 in decimal. To encrypt the
message each bit of each letter in the plaintext is combined with the
corresponding letters' bit in the pad in sequence using a transformation called the
bitwise exclusive or ( abbreviated to XOR ). This simply takes two bits as input and
outputs a single bit according to the following schema :
Input bits Output
bit Message Pad
0 0 0
0 1 1
1 0 1
1 1 0
This operation is performed on each letter in sequence i.e. The first letter of the
plaintext is XORed with the first letter of the pad to produce the first letter of the
ciphertext, then the second letter of the plaintext is XORed with the second letter
of the pad to produce the second letter of the ciphertext and so on.
A basic example :
Suppose you wish to encrypt the message [begin at 17.30] using the pad
[#/KBZaF>TQV^Nc ]. Firstly all the bits in 'b' are XORed with all the bits in '#. This
produces the binary pattern for the character 'A'.
Bit
sequence
for [b]
Bit
sequence
for [#]
Bitwise
XOR [A]
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
The only unbreakable cryptosystem known - the Vernam cipher http://www.pro-technix.com/information/crypto/pages/vernam_...
3 of 7 01/07/2014 6:14 PM
The same process is repeated for the next letters - '
e' and '/' are XORed to produce 'J'
'g' and 'K' are XORed to produce ',' etc.
To do this manually necessitates that you have a list of all the character binary
codes, which is why a computer is helpful. The completed ciphertext looks like
[AJ,+4A'Jt`ap}S]. By XORing the ciphertext with their duplicate pad, the receiver
regenerates the plaintext. This entire process can be implemented rapidly using
the Vernam.exe program on the downloads page.
You can experimentally verify this procedure as follows :
Produce a mapping table containing the letters of the alphabet, numerals 0
to 4 and the hyphen character. The hyphen character should be used as you
would a space. Assign to each entry an unique bit sequence between 00000
and 11111. A sample table is provided below.
Table 1
Letter
Bit
sequence
Letter
Bit
sequence
a 00000 q 10000
b 00001 r 10001
c 00010 s 10010
d 00011 t 10011
e 00100 u 10100
f 00101 v 10101
g 00110 w 10110
h 00111 x 10111
i 01000 y 11000
j 01001 z 11001
k 01010 0 11010
l 01011 1 11011
m 01100 2 11100
n 01101 3 11101
o 01110 4 11110
p 01111 - 11111
1.
Create a short message to encrypt. Remember to use the hyphen character
as a substitute for a space.
2.
Next generate a random pad of the same length as your message by
throwing a dice twice to index first the rows and then columns of the table
below. If the throws of the dice access an empty cell then simply throw the
3.
The only unbreakable cryptosystem known - the Vernam cipher http://www.pro-technix.com/information/crypto/pages/vernam_...
4 of 7 01/07/2014 6:14 PM
dice again twice until an occupied cell is indexed.
Table 2
- 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 a g m r w 1
2 b h n s x 2
3 c i o t y 3
4 d j p u z 4
5 e k q v 0 -
6 f l -
XOR each bit from each letter of the text with the corresponding bit of the
equivalent pad letter to create the ciphertext. This can be done manually or if
you used the mappings in table 1 the process can be simplified with table 3.
4.
XOR the ciphertext with the pad. You will regenerate the plaintext. 5.
One final test is to XOR the ciphertext with the plaintext. This will reconstruct
the pad.
Table 3
- a b c d e f g h i j k l mn o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5
a a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5
b
b a d c f e h g j i l k n m p o r q t s v u x w z y 1 0 3 2 5 4
c c d a b g h e f k l i j o p m n s t q r w x u v 0 1 y z 4 5 2 3
d d c b a h g f e l k j i p o n m t s r q x w v u 1 0 z y 5 4 3 2
e
e f g h a b c d m n o p i j k l u v w x q r s t 2 3 4 5 y z 0 1
f f e h g b a d c n m p o j i l k v u x w r q t s 3 2 5 4 z y 1 0
g
g h e f c d a b o p m n k l i j w x u v s t q r 4 5 2 3 0 1 y z
h h g f e d c b a p o n m l k j i x w v u t s r q 5 4 3 2 1 0 z y
i i j k l m n o p a b c d e f g h y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 q r s t u v w x
j j i l k n m p o b a d c f e h g z y 1 0 3 2 5 4 r q t s v u x w
k k l i j o p m n c d a b g h e f 0 1 y z 4 5 2 3 s t q r w x u v
l
l k j i p o n m d c b a h g f e 1 0 z y 5 4 3 2 t s r q x w v u
mm n o p i j k l e f g h a b c d 2 3 4 5 y z 0 1 u v w x q r s t
n
n m p o j i l k f e h g b a d c 3 2 5 4 z y 1 0 v u x w r q t s
o o p m n k l i j g h e f c d a b 4 5 2 3 0 1 y z w x u v s t q r
p p o n m l k j i h g f e d c b a 5 4 3 2 1 0 z y x w v u t s r q
q
q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p
r r q t s v u x w z y 1 0 3 2 5 4 b a d c f e h g j i l k n m p o
s
s t q r w x u v 0 1 y z 4 5 2 3 c d a b g h e f k l i j o p m n
t t s r q x w v u 1 0 z y 5 4 3 2 d c b a h g f e l k j i p o n m
u u v w x q r s t 2 3 4 5 y z 0 1 e f g h a b c d m n o p i j k l
6.
The only unbreakable cryptosystem known - the Vernam cipher http://www.pro-technix.com/information/crypto/pages/vernam_...
5 of 7 01/07/2014 6:14 PM
v v u x w r q t s 3 2 5 4 z y 1 0 f e h g b a d c n m p o j i l k
w w x u v s t q r 4 5 2 3 0 1 y z g h e f c d a b o p m n k l i j
x
x w v u t s r q 5 4 3 2 1 0 z y h g f e d c b a p o n m l k j i
y y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 q r s t u v w x i j k l m n o p a b c d e f g h
z
z y 1 0 3 2 5 4 r q t s v u x w j i l k n m p o b a d c f e h g
0 0 1 y z 4 5 2 3 s t q r w x u v k l i j o p m n c d a b g h e f
1 1 0 z y 5 4 3 2 t s r q x w v u l k j i p o n m d c b a h g f e
2
2 3 4 5 y z 0 1 u v w x q r s t m n o p i j k l e f g h a b c d
3 3 2 5 4 z y 1 0 v u x w r q t s n m p o j i l k f e h g b a d c
4
4 5 2 3 0 1 y z w x u v s t q r o p m n k l i j g h e f c d a b
5 5 4 3 2 1 0 z y x w v u t s r q p o n m l k j i h g f e d c b a
The security of the Vernam cipher
The one-time pad is unbreakable if used properly. The pad must be composed of
truly random data, it must never be used more than once and it must be kept
secure.
If each key letter in the pad sequence is truly random a cryptanalyst can do no
better than try every possible key letter for every ciphertext message position. This
is a hopeless situation for the attacker because it is equivalent to trying all the
possible messages the key could ever encrypt. Even for a short pad such as the
example given above the number of possible messages is in the region of
200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. The ciphertext can provide no clues as to which
one of these possibilities is the real message.
Why 'one-time' pad?
A pad should never be reused. As long as the pads are unique and never reused
no statistical analysis or pattern matching techniques can be applied by
cryptanalysts. The fact that the pad can be used only once is the "one time" point
of this cipher.
Soviet intelligence once reused one-time pads years after they had originally been
distributed to field agents in Britain. The British intelligence service noticed some
patterns in coded messages and began searching for comparisons through a
complete archive of all encrypted communications intercepts. Over a period of
years, various secret communications were compromised. This operation took
place under the code word VERONA. See the Wikipedia description of the
VERONA project here for further information.
Randomness and the Vernam cipher
True Randomness
The only unbreakable cryptosystem known - the Vernam cipher http://www.pro-technix.com/information/crypto/pages/vernam_...
6 of 7 01/07/2014 6:14 PM
The other critical aspect of the Vernam cipher is the randomness of the pad
sequence. An event sequence can be said to be truly random if it is impossible to
predict the next event in the sequence even if the entire state of the generating
process up to that point is known. Any deterministic process, such as running
software on a computer, can never produce truly random numbers. The next event
in a computer is completely predictable given the current machine/network/IO
state. ( This ignores the slight probability of a high energy subatomic particle
passing through your CPU or RAM chips and altering the state unpredictably )
Random data for the pad should never be generated purely by software. It must
be gathered by hardware accessing processes of a truly non-deterministic nature.
Radioactive decay and electron tunneling in electronic components are both
non-deterministic phenomena produced by events occurring at the quantum
subatomic level. By gathering and processing the output from Geiger counters or
Zener diodes it is possible to obtain truly random data for the pad. A statistical
study of the available hardware with links to the manufacturers can be found here.
Other resources on cryptological strength random numbers can be found in
Appendix E of the IEEE P1363 Public Key standard. The copy of the Randomness
Recommendations for Internet Security paper available in HTML format from this
site is very informative.
Conclusion
If you are intending to send highly secure or confidential information over
non-secure channels such as telephone, radio or post, and you require absolute
certainty that the ciphertext will not be decrypted if intercepted then there is no
choice but to use the Vernam cipher. This can be implemented using a hardware
true random number generator, a secure computer and some software to rapidly
XOR the data. The software needed is supplied in this site. Manufacturers of the
hardware can be found by following these links :
http://comscire.com/Home/
http://valley.interact.nl/av/com/orion/home.html
http://www.idquantique.com/true-random-number-generator/products-
overview.html


1999 - 2014 Protechnix.
The only unbreakable cryptosystem known - the Vernam cipher http://www.pro-technix.com/information/crypto/pages/vernam_...
7 of 7 01/07/2014 6:14 PM