Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: highlandeld@africaonline.co.ke (H.O. Farah).
tential evaporation can be estimated from mean daily
values of available meteorological variables such as
temperature, solar radiation, humidity and wind speed
(Allen et al., 1998). More recently, one or more in-
stantaneous measurements of evaporation have been
used to estimate daily total evaporation (Brutsaert
and Suigita, 1992). There has been a growing inter-
est in this approach because of its attractiveness for
remote sensing applications. Remote sensing offers
a means of estimating actual evaporation at a large
0303-2434/$ see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jag.2004.01.003
130 H.O. Farah et al. / International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5 (2004) 129140
spatial scale, which is not possible with the tradi-
tional point methods. Many techniques have been
proposed to solve the surface energy balance from re-
motely sensed surface temperature, surface reectance
and vegetation indices (Moran and Jackson, 1991;
Kustas and Norman, 1996; Bastiaanssen et al., 1999).
Remote sensing data are however instantaneous mea-
surements and a method is required to temporally
integrate instantaneous estimates of evaporation.
Latent heat ux (L) and other components of the
energy balance display considerable diurnal variation
over land surfaces. However several ratios of the uxes
have been shown to be relatively constant during day-
light hours (Jackson et al., 1983; Shuttleworth et al.,
1989; Bastiaanssen et al., 1996). The classical energy
partitioning indicator is the Bowen ratio (), which is
a ratio of the sensible heat ux (H) and L. The pit-
fall of applying for time integration is that it shows
distinct diurnal variation features. More recently the
evaporative fraction () has been found to have little
variations during daytime, although it is directly re-
lated to (Crago and Brutsaert, 1996). Evaporative
fraction is dened as:
=
L
R
n
G
=
L
L +H
=
1
1 +
(1)
where, R
n
is the net radiation and G the soil heat
ux. Shuttleworth et al. (1989), were the rst to no-
tice the constancy of during daylight hours. They
analyzed 4 clear sky days data from the rst ISLSCP
eld experiment (FIFE) over relatively homogeneous
grasslands and found that midday is nearly equal to
the average daylight . Nichols and Cuenca (1993),
used 72 days data from Hydrologic Atmospheric
Pilot Experiment-Modelisation du Bilan Hydrique
(HAPEX-MOBILHY) experiment and showed that
the midday was highly correlated with average
daytime but that the midday and daytime are
not statistically equal. Crago (1996a), evaluated 77
days data from FIFE. He used the data irrespective of
weather conditions of a particular day and concluded
that midday is signicantly different from the av-
erage daytime value, the reason being the concave-up
shape of the diurnal progression of .
The central question is whether an instantaneous
value of can be used to estimate daily actual evap-
oration (E) as:
E
d
=
ins
(R
n
G)
d
(2)
where, the subscripts d and ins indicate total daytime
and instantaneous values respectively. This way of ex-
pressing E is a simple approach to integrate E on a
daily basis and across a season, if at least the tem-
poral variations of are known. However, Eq. (2)
may not be valid under non-clear sky conditions be-
cause the diurnal constancy of may not be satised
under cloudy conditions (Zhang and Lemeur, 1995).
For areas with persistent cloud cover, such as in the
humid tropics, it is important to test the validity of
Eq. (2). In order to assess the performance of the ap-
proach, long term data series of measurements are re-
quired so that a wide range of different conditions are
encountered. Most of the previously published stud-
ies have used data from relatively short time periods
as reported above. In this study, eld data collected
over a period of about 1 year in Lake Naivasha basin
in Kenya is used to investigate the applicability of
the method to estimate E at daily scale and for
a season. Continuous daily E measurements at two
sites were compared with daily E estimated by using
Eq. (2).
The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the ca-
pability of instantaneous measurements of to esti-
mate the average day and E throughout a season in
tropical watersheds with data scarcity problems. Al-
though only eld data was used in this study, the re-
sults are expected to establish a sound basis for the es-
timation of E from instantaneous remote sensing data
and routine daily weather data. The theoretical back-
ground of and reasons for its stable diurnal behav-
ior are discussed in Section 2. The eld measurements
carried out are detailed in Section 3. In Section 4, the
diurnal stability of is discussed. The results of the
comparison between instantaneous and average day
are presented in Section 5, while the results of es-
timating time integrated E is presented in Section 6.
Finally the seasonal variations of are described in
Section 7.
2. Theoretical background
2.1. Reasons for the diurnal stability of
The diurnal behavior of can be understood from
its relationship with atmospheric conditions and sur-
face characteristics. The PenmanMonteith equation
H.O. Farah et al. / International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5 (2004) 129140 131
of L combines these conditions and is expressed as:
L =
(R
n
G) +C
p
[e
(z) e(z)]/r
a
+(1 +r
s
/r
a
)
(3)
where, is the slope of the saturation vapor pressure
curve, e*(z) and e(z) are the saturation vapor pressure
and actual vapor pressure at height z, C
p
the specic
heat of air at constant pressure, the air density,
the psychrometric constant, r
s
the surface resistance
to water vapor transport and r
a
is the aerodynamic
resistance to vapor transport. can be obtained by
dividing both sides of Eq. (3) by R
n
G giving the
following expression:
=
1
+(1 +r
s
/r
a
)
+
C
p
(e
(z) e(z))/r
a
R
n
G
(4)
Eq. (4) shows that is a function of vapor pressure
decit (VPD = e
(z) e(z)), r
a
and r
s
, besides avail-
able energy R
n
G.
The transfer equations for heat and water vapor be-
tween the surface of the earth and the atmosphere can
also be used to express without the explicit involve-
ment of R
n
G:
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
0 200 400 600 800
r
s
(m s
-1
)
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
(
-
)
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
0 200 400 600 800
Rn-G( W m
-2
)
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
(
-
)
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
To-Ta(
o
C)
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
(
-
)
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
VPD(hP)
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
(
-
)
(a) (b)
(d) (c)
Fig. 1. Evaporative fraction as a function of available energy, R
n
G, surface resistance, r
s
, from Eq. (4) and surface and air temperature
difference, T
0
T
a
and vapour pressure decit, VPD, from Eq. (7), with the following conditions prevailing on 28th October 1998
at a grassland site: (a) r
s
= 300 s m
1
, r
a
= 70 s m
1
, VPD = 15 mb; (b) R
n
G = 300 wm
2
, r
a
= 70 s m
1
, VPD = 15 mb; (c)
r
s
= 300 s m
1
, r
a
= 70 s m
1
, VPD = 15 mb (d) r
s
= 300 s m
1
, r
a
= 70 s
1
, T
0
T
a
= 2
C.
H =
C
p
(T
0
T
a
)
r
a
(5)
LE =
C
p
(e
(T
0
) e(T
a
)
(r
s
+r
a
)
(6)
where, T
0
and T
a
are the surface temperature and air
temperature, respectively. By Further expressing as
L/(L+H) (see Eq. (1)), an alternative expression for
becomes:
=
L
L +H
= 1
1
(1 +[r
s
((e
T
0
) e(T
a
))]/
(r
a
+r
s
)(T
0
T
a
)
(7)
For ideal conditions with no cloud obstructions and no
heat or moisture advection, R
n
G, r
s
, and VPD fol-
low a regular diurnal cycle. Rowntree (1991), showed
that is more sensitive to R
n
G when R
n
G is
small. Fig. 1a shows as a function of R
n
G. It can
be seen that up to a value of 200 Wm
2
, decreases
rapidly with increasing R
n
G. then remains almost
constant with further increase in R
n
G. Available
132 H.O. Farah et al. / International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5 (2004) 129140
energy greater than 200 Wm
2
, usually occurs be-
tween 9.00 and 16.00 h. This means that variations in
is largest in the mornings and the evenings when
R
n
G is small (<200 Wm
2
). Rowntree (1991) also
demonstrated that variations of due to r
s
are larger
for small values of r
s
(wet conditions) than for larger
r
s
values (dry conditions). Fig. 1b illustrates as a
function of r
s
. decreases rapidly when r
s
increases
from 20 s m
1
to approximately 150 s m
1
, but de-
creases at much smaller rate afterwards. Because
R
n
G often exceeds 200 Wm
2
during midday con-
ditions, can be expected to behave temporally sta-
ble especially for moderately wet and to dry surface
conditions with r
s
larger than 150 ms
1
.
Eq. (7) introduces (T
0
T
a
) as an important vari-
able in the determination of . The diurnal trend of
T
0
T
a
follows closely that of solar radiation reaching
the earth surface (K), T
0
and T
a
. Crago (1996b), il-
lustrated the dependence of on T
0
T
a
for different
surface conditions. He used the formulation of Eq. (7)
for to show that is most sensitive to T
0
T
a
when
T
0
T
a
is small (<2
C. Such values of T
0
T
a
occur in the
middle of the day under clear sky conditions. Fig. 1d
presents the relationship between and VPD using
Eq. (7). increases with increasing VPD, however
increases at lower rate for VPD values larger than
10 mb. Values of VPD larger than 10 mb usually pre-
vail during day light hours.
2.2. Computation of and E
In this study is derived from measurements.
is determined from the difference in vapor pressure
and temperature between the two observational levels:
=
H
L
=
dT
de
=
Ta1 Ta2
e1 e2
(8)
where, the subscripts 1 and 2 indicate the lower and
upper levels, respectively. under eld conditions is
then computed as follows:
=
1
1 +
(9)
Daytime E is calculated as
E =
t2
t1
(R
n
G)dt (10)
where the time difference t
2
t
1,
represents the time
from 8.00 to 17.00 h in the present study. Daytime E
can in a simplied manner be estimated from midday
(
mid
) and morning (
mor
) as follows:
E =
mid
t2
t1
(R
n
G)dt (11)
For
mid
and
mor
measurements conducted between
12.00 and 13.00 h and 9.00 and 10.00 h, respectively
have been used. The daily net radiation is given by:
R
n
= (1 )K +Ln (12)
where, is the surface reectance and Ln is the net
longwave radiation. K was obtained from direct mea-
surements of solar radiation and Ln was evaluated
from T
a
and Relative Humidity (RH) by using empiri-
cal functions (Holtslag and Van Ulden, 1983). G is es-
timated as10% of R
n
during daytime hours (de Bruin
and Holtslag, 1982) and ignored on a daily basis.
3. Field experiment and study area
The study area comprises the Lake Naivasha basin
located in central Kenya (Fig. 2). Two sites, namely
Ndabibi and Eburu, with different canopy cover and
at different altitudes were selected for in situ measure-
ments. The topography of the Ndabibi site varies from
slightly undulating to at terrain and is at an altitude
of 1900 m. The vegetation consists mainly of annual
grasses. The Eburu site is at an altitude of 2200 m and
being a hilly terrain, is covered by woodland and for-
est. MaximumT
a
is approximately 32