Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
2
1
2
2
2
B
RB
B
I
V
R
Designer must choose I
B2
and V
RB2
such that V
CE
>V
RB2
>V
BE
) 1 (
) ( ) ( ) (
] ) 1 ( [ ) (
1 2 2 1
2 2 1
FE CBO FE
B C C FE B C B B ie B
CC FE CBO C B C B B BE
C
h I h
R R R h R R R R h R
V h I R R R R R V
I + +
+ + + + + +
+
.
+ +
.
. .
.
R
B2
V
BE
I
B2
R
B1
V
CE
.
I
B2
R
B2
I
B
I
B2
R
C
V
CC
V
CE
I
C
I
B
I
B2
I
C
.
R
C
h
F E
I
C BO
.
R
C
I
C BO
.
R
C
R
B2
V
BE
. .
R
C
.
R
B2
h
F E
h
i e
I
C BO
. .
R
C
R
B2
h
i e
I
C BO
.
R
B1
h
F E
I
C BO
.
R
B1
I
C BO
.
R
B1
R
B2
V
BE
. .
R
B1
.
R
B2
h
F E
h
i e
I
C BO
. .
R
B1
R
B2
h
i e
I
C BO
V
BE
. .
1
h
F E
h
i e
I
C BO
.
h
i e
I
C BO
V
C C
R
C
R
C
h
F E
.
R
C
.
R
B2
h
F E
h
i e
R
B1
h
F E
.
R
B1
.
R
B2
h
F E
h
i e
.
1
h
F E
h
i e
Designer must choose I
B2
R
B1
R
B2
R
C
V
CC
, ' constant
V
I
V
I h
BE
C
BE
CBO FE
'
'
, constant
h
I
h
I V
FE
C
FE
CBO BE
, ' constant
Col l ector Current at any Temperature (I
C
)
I
CBO
Stabi l i ty Factor
V'
BE
Stabi l i ty Factor
h
FE
Stabi l i ty Factor
I
I
I
V
I
V
h
I
h
CBO
C
CBO
BE
C
BE
FE
C
FE
'
'
h
FE
, V'
BE
= constant
I
CBO
, h
FE
= constant
I
CBO
, V'
BE
= constant
Fi rst cal cul ate the stabi l i ty factors
for V'
BE
, I
CBO
and h
FE
. Then, to
fi nd the change i n col l ector current
at any temperature, mul ti pl y the
change from 25 degrees C of each
temper atur e dependent var i abl e
wi th i ts correspondi ng stabi l i ty fac-
tor and sum.
I
C
= SI
CBO
I
CBO
+ SV'
BE
V'
BE
+ Sh
FE
h
FE
Bi as Ci rcui t Non- # 2 Vol t age # 3 Vol t age # 4 Vol t age # 5 Emi t t er
st abi l i zed Feedback Feedback Feedback Feedback
w/Current
Source
I
CBO
stability factor 81 52.238 50.865 19.929 11.286
V
BE
stability factor 2.56653 10
3
2.568011 10
3
3.956 10
3
0.015 6.224378 10
3
h
FE
stability factor 6.249877 10
5
4.031 10
5
3.924702 10
5
1.537669 10
5
8.707988 10
6
I
C
due to I
CBO
(mA) 0.120 0.078 0.076 0.030 0.017
I
C
due to V
BE
(mA) 0.210 0.205 0.316 1.200 0.497
I
C
due to h
FE
(mA) 0.999 0.645 0.628 0.246 0.140
Total I
C
(mA) 1.329 0.928 1.020 1.476 0.654
Percentage change 26.6% 18.6% 20.4% 29.5% 13.1%
in I
C
from nominal I
C
42 APPLI ED MI CROWAVE & WI RELESS
change i n I
C
versus h
FE
. AppCAD i s used to cal cul ate the
resi stor val ues for each of the fi ve bi as networks. The
HBFP-0405 transi stor i s bi ased at a V
CE
of 2 vol ts, I
C
of
5 mA, and V
CC
of 2.7 vol ts. Vari ous val ues of h
FE
are sub-
sti tuted i nto AppCAD; resul ts are presented i n Fi gure 9.
The data cl earl y shows that the emi tter feedback and
vol tage feedback wi th vol tage source networks are supe-
ri or to the remai ni ng ci rcui ts wi th regards to control l i ng
h
FE
at room temperature. These networks provi de a 4:1
i mprovement over the other two vol tage feedback net-
works.
AppCAD i s then used to si mul ate a temperature
change from T
j
= 25 de-grees C to +65 de-grees C wi th
h
FE
hel d constant. Whereas the ori gi nal Matchcad
anal ysi s assumed that T
c
= T
j
, AppCAD takes i nto
account that T
j
i s greater than T
c
. AppCAD cal cul ates
the thermal ri se based on DC power di ssi pated and the
thermal i mpedance of the devi ce. The resul ts of the
anal ysi s are shown i n Fi gure 10. The vol tage feedback
wi th vol tage source network performed nearl y as poorl y
as the non-stabi l i zed ci rcui t. Thi s i s due to the tempera-
ture i nduced V
BE
decrease and the bi as ci rcui t tryi ng to
keep V
BE
constant. Power bi pol ar desi gners wi l l often
uti l i ze a si l i con di ode i n pl ace of R
B2
so that the bi as
vol tage wi l l track the V
BE
of the transi stor. Dependi ng
on the i mpedance of the vol tage di vi der network, V
BE
coul d ri se, causi ng I
C
to i ncrease. The emi tter feedback
network performed very wel l as expected. The si mpl e
vol tage feedback network appeared to be opti mum when
consi deri ng the si mpl i ci ty of the ci rcui t.
Bi as networks 3 through 5 make use of an addi ti onal
resi stor that shunts some of the total power suppl y cur-
rent to ground. Properl y chosen, thi s addi ti onal bi as
current can be used to assi st i n control l i ng I
C
over tem-
perature and h
FE
vari ati ons from devi ce to devi ce.
AppCAD i s set up such that the desi gner has vari ous
choi ces regardi ng the amount of bi as resi stor current
that i s al l owed to fl ow from the power suppl y. AppCAD
i s used to anal yze each bi as ci rcui t.
The graphs i n Fi gures 11 and 12 pl ot the percentage
change i n I
C
versus the rati o of I
C
to I
RB1
. I
RB1
i s the cur-
rent fl owi ng through resi stor R
B1
, whi ch i s the summa-
ti on of base current I
B
and current fl owi ng through
resi stor R
B2
. The maxi mum permi ssi bl e rati o of I
C
to
I
RB1
i s l i mi ted by the h
FE
of the transi stor. Fi gure 11
represents the worst case condi ti on, where I
C
i ncreases
at maxi mum h
FE
and hi ghest temperature. Fi gure 12
shows the opposi te scenari o, i n whi ch the l owest I
C
resul ts from l owest h
FE
and l owest temperature. The
percentage change i s certai nl y more pronounced at hi gh
h
FE
and hi gh temperature.
Al though some of the predi cted resul ts are somewhat
surpri si ng, the bi as network wi th emi tter resi stor feed-
back, as expected, offers the best performance overal l .
For a rati o of I
C
to I
RB1
of 10 to 1 or l ess, the resul tant
change i n col l ector current i s l ess than 20 percent. The
vol tage feedback wi th vol tage source network performs
best wi th an I
C
to I
RB1
rati o between 6 and 10 wi th a
worst case change of 41 percent i n col l ector current.
To compl ete the compari son, two addi ti onal poi nts
representi ng the nonstabi l i zed and the vol tage feedback
networks have been added to the graphs. They are
L Fi gure 8. Agi l ent Technol ogi es AppCAD modul e f or BJT
bi asi ng.
-40.00%
-20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
50 70 90 110 130 150
h
FE
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
F
r
o
m
A
Q
u
i
e
s
c
e
n
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
Nob-stabilized
Voltage Feedback
Voltage Feedback
w/Current Source
Voltage Feedback
w/Voltage Source
Emitter Feedback
L Fi gure 9. Percent change i n qui escent col l ect or current
versus h
FE
f or t he HBFP- 0405 where V
CC
= 2.7 vol t s, V
CE
= 2 vol t s, I
C
= 5 mA and T
j
= + 25 degrees C.
-40.00%
-30.00%
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
-25 -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 65
o
(C)
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
F
r
o
m
A
Q
u
i
e
s
c
e
n
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
Non-stabilized
Voltage Feedback
Voltage Feedback
w/Current Source
Vol tage Feedback
w/Voltage Source
Emitter Feedback
Temperature
L Fi gure 10. Percent change i n qui escent col l ect or current
versus t emperat ure f or t he HBFP- 0405 where V
CC
= 2.7
vol t s, V
CE
= 2 vol t s, I
C
= 5 mA and T
j
= + 25 degrees C.
44 APPLI ED MI CROWAVE & WI RELESS
shown as si ngl e poi nts because onl y the base current i s
i n addi ti on to the col l ector current. The nonstabi l i zed
network has an i ncrease of 129 percent, whi l e the vol t-
age feedback network has an i ncrease of 74.5 percent.
The vol tage feedback wi th current source network offers
no benefi t over the si mpl er vol tage feedback network.
Concl usi on
Thi s arti cl e di scussed the ci rcui t anal ysi s of four com-
monl y used stabi l i zed bi as networks and one nonstabi -
l i zed bi as network for the bi pol ar juncti on transi stor. I n
addi ti on to the presentati on of the basi c desi gn equa-
ti ons for the bi as resi stors for each network, an equati on
was presented for col l ector current i n terms of bi as
resi stors and devi ce parameters. The col l ector current
equati on was then di fferenti ated wi th respect to the
three pri mary temperature dependent vari abl es resul t-
i ng i n three stabi l i ty factors for each network. These
stabi l i ty factors pl us the basi c col l ector current equati on
gi ve the desi gner i nsi ght as to how best bi as transi stors
for best performance over h
FE
and temperature vari a-
ti ons. The basi c equati ons were then i ntegrated i nto an
AppCAD modul e, provi di ng the ci rcui t desi gner wi th an
easy and effecti ve way to anal yze bi as networks for bi po-
l ar transi stors. I
Acknowl edgement
The authors woul d l i ke to thank Bob Myers at Agi l ent
Technol ogi es i n Newark, CA, for hi s fi ne work i n con-
verti ng the bi pol ar bi asi ng equati ons i nto a very effec-
ti ve and useful AppCAD modul e wi th whi ch vari ous bi as
networks can be easi l y desi gned and eval uated.
Ref erences
1. A Cost-Effective Amplifier Design Approach at 425
MHz Using the HXTR-3101 Silicon Bipolar Transistor,
Hewl ett-Packard Appl i cati on Note 980, February 1981
(out of pri nt).
2. Kenneth Ri chter, Desi gn DC Stabi l i ty I nto Your
Transi stor Ci rcui ts, Microwaves, December 1973: 4046.
3. Microwave Transistor Bias Considerations,
Hewl ett-Packard Appl i cati on Note 944-1, August 1980,
(out of pri nt).
4. 1800 to 1900 MHz Amplifier using the HBFP-0405
and HBFP-0420 Low Noise Silicon Bipolar Transistors,
Hewl ett-Packar d Appl i cati on Note 1160, November
1998, publ i cati on number 5968-2387E.
5. AppCAD i s avai l abl e from Agi l ent Technol ogi es
through the companys Web si te, www.semi conductor.
agi l ent.com.
Aut hor i nf ormat i on
Al Ward i s an appl i cati ons engi neer wi th Agi l ent
Technol ogi es Wi rel ess Semi conductor Di vi si on, 1410 E.
Renner Road, Sui te 100, Ri chardson, TX, 75082. He may
be reached at 972-699-4369, or vi a e-mai l at al _ward@
agi l ent.com. Bryan Ward was a summer SEED stu-
dent wi th Agi l ent Technol ogi es.
Maximum h
FE
and +65
o
C
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
1 10 100
Ratio of Ic to IRB1
Non-stabilized
Voltage Feedback
Voltage Feedback
w/Current Source
Voltage Feedback
w/Voltage Source
Emitter Feedback
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
I
c
(
+
)
L Fi gure 12. Percent change i n qui escent col l ect or current
versus rat i o of I
C
t o I
RB1
f or mi ni mum h
FE
and T
j
= 25
degrees C f or t he HBFP- 0405, where V
CC
= 2.7 vol t s, V
CE
= 2 vol t s and I
C
= 5 mA.
L Fi gure 11. Percent change i n qui escent col l ect or current
versus rat i o of I
C
t o I
RB1
f or maxi mum h
FE
and T
j
= + 65
degrees C f or t he HBFP- 0405, where V
C
= 2.7 vol t s, V
CE
= 2 vol t s and I
C
= 5 mA.
46 APPLI ED MI CROWAVE & WI RELESS
L St abi l i t y f act ors f or vol t age f eedback wi t h current source bi as net work # 3.
V
I
V
I h
BE
C
BE
CBO FE
'
'
, constant
I
I
I
h V
CBO
C
CBO
FE BE
, ' = constant
h
I
h
I V
FE
C
FE
CBO BE
, ' constant
Col l ector Current at any
Temperature (I
C
)
I
CBO
Stabi l i ty Factor
V'
BE
Stabi l i ty Factor
h
FE
Stabi l i ty Factor
h
V A R R I h V
R h A R h R R R
I h
FE
BE B C CBO FE CC
B ie B FE C C B
CBO FE
+ ( )
[ ]
+ ( ) + + + ( )
1
]
1
1
+ + ( )
'
2
2 1
1
1
) 1 (
) 1 ( ) (
FE C B ie
FE CBO BE CC FE
h R R h
A h I V V h
+
.
. + +
.
'
+ +
.
V
I
V
I h
BE
C
BE
CBO FE
'
'
, constant
I
I
I
h V
CBO
C
CBO
FE BE
, ' = constant
) 1 (
) 1 (
FE C B ie
FE
h R R h
A h
.
.
+
+ + +
) 1 (
FE C B ie
FE
h R R h
h
+ + +
.
C ie B C FE
CBO BE CC
R h R R h
I A V V ' +
.
.
+ + +
2
) (
) (
C ie B C FE
CBO CBO BE CC FE C
R h R R h
I A I A V V h R
+ +
.
. .
' + + .
+
C B ie
R R h A + +
h
I
h
I V
FE
C
FE
CBO BE
, ' constant
Col l ector Current at any Temperature (I
C
)
I
CBO
Stabi l i ty Factor
V'
BE
Stabi l i ty Factor
h
FE
Stabi l i ty Factor
where
L St abi l i t y f act ors f or vol t age f eedback bi as net work # 2.
Appendi x
where A = R
B1
+ R
B2
+ R
C
B = V'
BE
(R
B1
+ R
B2
+ R
C
)
C = (R
B
+ h
ie
) (R
B1
+ R
B2
+ R
C
)
D = (R
B
+ h
ie
) (R
B1
+ R
B2
+ R
C
)
+ R
B2
(h
FE
R
C
+ R
C
+ R
B1
)
50 APPLI ED MI CROWAVE & WI RELESS
L St abi l i t y f act ors f or vol t age f eedback wi t h vol t age source bi as net work # 4.
. .
.
Collector Current at any Temperature (IC
)
I
CBO
Stability Fact or
V
BE
Stability Factor
h
FE
Stability Factor
Where:
C
CC
V D B
ie
h
CBO
I A
CBO
I ( )
.
( ) +
C
A B h
ie
[ ]
C
E h I
h
R
h
R
I
ie CBO
FE
B
FE
C
CBO
2
1
2
C
R
R
R
R
B
B
B
C
1
2
1
2
constant V , h
I
I
I
BE FE
CBO
C
CBO
constant h , I
V
I
V
FE CBO
BE
C
BE
2 2
2
1
2
2
1
FE FE B
B
FE B
C
h h R
R
h R
R
E
BE
B
BE
B
BE
B
C
V
R
V
R
V
R
R
D
2
1
2
]
+ +
+ + +
FE FE B
B
FE B
C
ie
FE
B
FE
C
C
h h R
R
h R
R
h
h
R
h
R
R C
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2 2
FE B
B
FE B
B
B
C
FE B
C
h R
R
h R
R
R
R
h R
R
B
1
1
B
FE
B
C
FE
C
R
h
R
R
h
R
A + + +
+
+
E h
h
R
h
R
C
V D B h I + A I
ie
FE
B
FE
C CC ie CBO CBO
2
1
2 2
constant V , I
h
I
h
BE CBO
FE
C
FE
+
+
.
+
. .
[
]
[
+ +
V
I
V
I h
BE
C
BE
CBO FE
'
'
, constant
I
I
I
h V
CBO
C
CBO
FE BE
, ' = constant
h
I
h
I V
FE
C
FE
CBO BE
, ' constant
Col l ector Current at any
Temperature (I
C
)
I
CBO
Stabi l i ty Factor
V'
BE
Stabi l i ty Factor
h
FE
Stabi l i ty Factor
B
R
R h
R
R
R
R h
R
R h
C
B FE
C
B
B
B FE
B
B FE
+ +
+ + +
2 2
1
2
1
2
1
1
where:
52 APPLI ED MI CROWAVE & WI RELESS
Collector Current at any Temperature (I
C
)
I
CBO
Stabilit y Factor
V
BE
Stabilit y Factor
h
FE
Stabilit y Factor
Where:
FE
E
FE
E
E
FE
E
FE FE
ie
h
R
R
R
R
h
R
R
R
R
h
R
h R
R
h
h C
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
+ + + + +
C
D B I A I h
CBO CBO ie
+ + ) ( ) (
C
B A h
ie
+
constant h , I
V
I
V
FE CBO
BE
C
BE
constant V , h
I
I
I
BE FE
CBO
C
CBO
C
R
R
2
1
1
CC BE BE
V V
R
R
V D +
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
R
h
R
R
h
R
R
R
R
h
R
R
R
B
FE
E
FE
E
E
FE
E
+ + + + +
1
1
2
1
2
1
+ + +
FE FE
h R
R
h R
R
A
+
E
h R
R
h
h
C
D A I h B I
FE FE
ie
CBO ie CBO
2
2
1
2 2
1
.
+
C
h R
R
h
I h E I
FE FE
CBO ie CBO
2
2
1
2
1
constant V , I
h
I
h
BE CBO
FE
C
FE
[ ]
[ ( ) ]
+
( )
+
L St abi l i t y f act ors f or emi t t er f eedback bi as net work # 5.
V
I
V
I h
BE
C
BE
CBO FE
'
'
, constant
I
I
I
h V
CBO
C
CBO
FE BE
, ' = constant
h
I
h
I V
BE
FE
C
FE
CBO BE
, ' constant
Col l ector Current at any
Temperature (I
C
)
I
CBO
Stabi l i ty Factor
V'
BE
Stabi l i ty Factor
h
FE
Stabi l i ty Factor
FE
E
FE
E
E
FE
E
FE FE
ie
h
R
R
R
R
h
R
R
R
R
h
R
h R
R
h
h C
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
+ + + + +
2
1
2
2
1
2
FE FE
E
FE
E
h
R
h
R
R
R
h
R
E
CC BE BE
V V
R
R
V D +
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
R
h
R
R
h
R
R
R
R
h
R
R
R
B
FE
E
FE
E
E
FE
E
+ + + + +
1
1
2
1
2
1
+ + +
FE FE
h R
R
h R
R
A
( )
+
I E h I
h
R
R h
C
I B h I
CBO ie CBO
FE FE
CBO ie CBO
+
1
]
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
+
_
,
1
]
1
1
A D
C
h
h
R
R h
E
ie
FE FE
2 2
1
2
2
1
where