Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 3 Issue 8, August - 2014
IJE
RT
I. INTRODUCTION
Weight reduction and cost optimization of automotive
components are biggest challenges faced by the automotive
industry in present scenario. The automotive OEMs and their
component suppliers worldwide spend billions on R&D,
which does intensive research on advanced materials whose
properties are superior to those of the conventional materials,
are cost effective and reduces the actual weight of the
system/sub-system thus improving the fuel efficiency of the
vehicle.
The leaf spring accounts for 10-20% of the unsprung weight
of the vehicle [2,3,7]. Any reduction of the unsprung weight
would help in achieving improved ride characteristics [2].
Introduction of FRP (Fiber Reinforced Plastic) material for
the leaf spring has made it possible to replace the
conventional multi-leaf steel spring with a mono composite
leaf thereby achieving a weight reduction of nearly 80-90%
[2,3,4,7]. One of the most advantageous reasons for
IJERTV3IS081093
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
1413
Values
865 mm
910 mm
75 mm
Number of leaves
60 mm
7.25 mm
IJE
RT
The material used for the leaf spring of Tata Ace HD vehicle
is 55Si2Mn90. The material properties of 55Si2Mn90 are
shown in the table below
Table 2 Material properties of 55Si2Mn90 [9]
Parameter
Value
Youngs Modulus
210 GPa
Poissons Ratio
0.3
1962 MPa
Yield Strength
1500 MPa
Density
7850 kg/
IJERTV3IS081093
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
1414
E-Glass/Epoxy
41165.8
10328.8
10328.8
3788.2
3655
3788.2
0.259
0.413
0.259
0.002004
[16]
945 kg
1550 kg
Parabolic multi-leaf steel spring with
hydraulic double acting shock absorber
IJE
RT
On solving (1) & (2), we obtain two values for the thickness.
h1 = 15.83 mm
h2 = 18.00 mm
From the stress point of view, the design is safe with 15.83
mm, but considering deflection, it exceeds the camber of 75
mm, thus making the design fail. Hence, we select 18 mm as
the safe thickness which satisfies both the criteria of
maximum stress and maximum deflection.
III.
R = 38.231 N/mm
The design variable (thickness) for a mono composite leaf
spring is computed using the standard design formulae as
given below [12, 14, 15]
Fig.4 Stress induced in E-Glass/Epoxy composite leaf
IJERTV3IS081093
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
1415
Analytical Result
373.68
69.6
38.23
FEA Result
372.2
70.8
37.58
IJE
RT
Frequency (Hz)
64.62
201.39
369.69
421.59
984.06
1024.1
IV.
FABRICATION OF PROTOTYPE
As per the SAE standards for analyzing leaf spring, only half
leaf spring is required [4]. A half leaf of E-Glass/Epoxy
composite without eye is fabricated using hand lay-up
process.
A wooden mould is prepared following the
geometrical dimensions of the leaf as calculated
from design formulae.
IJERTV3IS081093
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
1416
V.
IJE
RT
IJERTV3IS081093
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
1417
IJE
RT
IJERTV3IS081093
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
1418
64.62
62
VI.
60
62
CONCLUSION
IJE
RT
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to thank our advisors Asst.Prof. Ravikumar
and Asst.Prof. Syed Shahul Hameed for helping us with
vibration testing of prototype. We also thank Asst.Prof.
Arockia Julius for helping us in fabrication of composite leaf.
REFERENCES
IJERTV3IS081093
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
1419