You are on page 1of 7

The Enjoined Ambuscade of Manifest

Simulacra as Law
By

Yes the title is a mouthful and it would be helpful to define for your self the terms in
the title.
 Enjoined
 Ambuscade
 Manifest
 Enjoined
 Simulacra

Did it help? Oh well, then let’s move to the long version:


What I am talking about is the creation of rules that we ignorantly think we are
bound to and how those rules can be enforced under real law. It is vital that one
knows the difference between real law and fictions of law or rules having the name of
“statutory law”, “statures”, “colorable law”, “fictions of law” or law that grows from
the concept of “Legal Positivism. What is “legal” is not what is “lawful”. Legality
pertains to fiction and matters involving contracts. What is lawful, deals with matters
enforced and judged by that which men call God or nature, depending on their
spiritual proclivities. Gravity is completely in the hands of nature. Killing someone
has consequences as it violates the rights of another. When one kills there are
always uncomfortable consequences that occur and fall outside of any man-made
enforcement, prosecutorial and judicial process. In fact, the entire law creation,
enforcement and adjudication process is parasitic. These agencies feed off the
power granted by divine right to the victim such that they are made whole. Why we
believe we need these parasites is a question that goes far deeper then this
treatment will explore. Remember that “vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord” thing
the religious folks harp about? Well like it or not, that truth is firmly ensconced in our
system of law.
As an aside, the use of the word “Lord” in place of “God” or “nature” is dubious in
the extreme. The reason is that one could falsely believe that God or nature has the
will or desire to keep a man from killing or jumping from a cliff as it is implied by the
word “Lord”. No, God will not stop us from killing or jumping from a cliff but one
must understand that when one kills or jumps from a cliff that they will recognize
very soon that they immediately experience some uncomfortable consequences.
We, in our ignorance, call those consequences “bad luck” but it is simply that actions
have consequences and a cause has an effect. Man has long documented that
certain actions have unwelcome effects. Common Law is at its core contains many of
these action that yield to harsh consequences. This concept is what is understood
as: “The Law cannot compel performance”.
In matter of law it is extremely important for a man or woman to understand the
difference between real law and “fictions of law”. Lawful is real. Legal is fiction. God
enforces “Law”. Man through the existence of a contract enforces “Legality”. We
cannot be forced to accept laws created by man. Why? The reason is that all true
contracts are voluntary. Since “legality” can only have force of “law” when a man or
woman makes contract. We can in ignorance be fooled into thinking that we are
subject to the laws of man because many do not understand that a contract must be
voluntary. There is no forced compliance and this is indicated in every man-made
law. This is the remedy to the law of man. See “Contract: A Principle of the Power of
Law” for a more detailed treatment.
I tend not to resort to expletives but in this case I will make an exception because
sanitized verbiage really falls short. “Legal and legality” is simulacra or an image or
fiction used in place of the real thing. So whenever one hears the word “legal” or
“legality” one must substitute the word BULLSHIT! Take “legal tender” or the
“money” we use. It becomes “Bullshit Tender” or a fictional or weak representation
of money. Now would you sell your car for bullshit money? Do you lawfully own
things if you paid with bullshit money? Think about that for a while.
This bullshit surrounds us. We have a bullshit government, Bullshit laws, bullshit
cops, bullshit lawyers, bullshit judges and bullshit courts. See “Who Are These
Enemies of the USA?” for a more detailed treatment. The biggest mistakes we make
is we presume that we are subject to the “law” and we presume those we hold in
authority have the power to enact, enforce and adjudicate these “laws”. We seldom
question the validity of this law and authority and they have taken great care in
making sure the average man or woman never se the trick. If you noticed I did not
say “person”. The reason is that “person” has a specific legal meaning that is
outside of what we think a “person” is. Oh, you can to the dictionary and look up the
word person but until one understands that under legal or bullshit law one can define
any term however they want. It is lawful provided they actually tell you that they are
calling a “square” a “circle”. It is when we try to find the diameter of their “circle”
when the simulacra is exposed for what it is.
For instance, is there anyone who actually believes the Federal Government is
actually a “servant” of the people? They have simply redefined the term servant.
People in researching law make a fatal mistake. The go to the glossary of the “law”
book and look up the section of interest. They read: “all “persons” are subject…etc.”
They presume that the law applies to them. Person is a simulacrum representing
individual people created under the un-ratified 14th Amendment ad referred to in the
latest 13th Amendment.

14th Amendment:

• Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the
State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which
shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
• Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States
according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of
persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to
vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice
President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive
and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof,
is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one
years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged,
except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of
representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the
number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male
citizens twenty-one years of age in such State
• Section 3. No one shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or
elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military,
under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken
an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or
as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer
of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have
engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds
of each House, remove such disability.
• Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by
law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for
services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt
or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United
States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such
debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
• Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate
legislation, the provisions of this article.
Sounds impressive doesn’t it? The important things a man or woman should
understand is that this amendment was not ratified! We were not asked that it be
law and that is why they put at the very beginning: “All persons born or naturalized in
the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside.” Person is does not apply to a man or
woman! That is, until they willfully or in ignorance describe themselves as a person!
See “The Official State Office Known as ‘Person’” for a more detailed treatment on
what exactly they are talking about when they use the term person.

The 13th Amendment


• Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
• Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by
appropriate legislation.
Here is another un-ratified bullshit amendment and look at the last lines in both
amendments: “Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation.” Well guess what? If we did not give them the permission to be our
“god” then they are not our “god”. That is, unless we give them that permission.
Notice that the ban “slavery” and “involuntary servitude”. They did not ban
“voluntary servitude”! That means is you choose to willingly be our slave then they
are more then happy to accommodate you. It is crucial to understand what is going
on here. One needs to understand the whole “subject to the jurisdiction” bullshit
routine. This is what they mean:
I am forming a club. To be a member of my club and to be able to
wear the fancy hat, you can only join willingly. If you willingly join
you must abide by the club rules and that is you are to be my
personal slave one day a week for the rest of your lives. If you break
the rule then you will be my slave for two days a week and so on and
so on. You can leave any time provided you tap your heels together
three times and say: “there is no place like home.” and then you
must give back the fancy hat. Until you employ your remedy then
you will be compelled or forced to be my slave and I have the power
to enforce this rule as I see fit using any means at my disposal. If
you want to be part of the club then you must know the club has
rules.
What we are dealing with is the same thing. They set up a club, the club has rules
and they will force you to obey the rules of the club. However in the example above
the remedy is obvious in that you tap your heels together three times and say: “there
is no place like home.” and then you must give back the fancy hat. In the case of
Federal law they do not make the escape or remedy obvious. Obvious hell! They
deliberately concealed it though legalistic (bullshit) jargon and couched it within
other bullshit jurisdictional constructs. It does exist but finding it takes patience and
the persistence to sort through their “code”. The Uniform Commercial Code UCC is
deliberately encrypted. That is why it is called code. The Federal Government did
not write it. It is the intellectual property of the Vatican and is leased by the Federal
Government for use in their fictional “State”. The trick is to realize that being a
“person” or a “US Citizen” is to willingly join their club.
The second big mistake that a man or woman makes is to presume that the
governing body has the authority and power to govern and in the case of the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA it has neither. Remember that is established law that:
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed
This from the Declaration of Independence. The operative word here is consent. If a
bunch of traitors in government want to create a club and most of the people
ignorantly join then one must understand that I cannot be force to join and they do
not have the power to force me. Am I Un-American? Hell no! I was born here and
my forefathers fought for me to be here. I’ll be damned if a bunch of idiot
nincompoops push me off the land of my country! If they want to be slaves to
international bankers then no problem but I choose not to join that club!
If you read: “Who Are These Enemies of the USA?” then you understand that the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is not lawful because it is a fictional corporation.
Now what is the difference between a mall cop and a police officer? They both
have official looking uniforms. The both serve in an official capacity under a granting
authority. Both are bullshit it is just the amount of concealment of their respective
illegitimate authority. Nothing more
When one looks in the glossary of the law book or code to find the law, then they
will mistakenly think the law applies to them. The astute will go to the beginning of
the book and first check to see if the law actually applies to them. If we as a people
would start doing this simple thing and carefully look at the terms then one will
understand that this “law” or bullshit does not apply to men, women or people. If the
law specifically does not list a particular thing then it is law that it does not apply to
that thing. For instance when one goes to the UCC then they see all the things that
the law applies to. The list a term called “party”. They then define party as person,
corporation, LLC etc. When you look at the term person it is described as
“individual”, corporation, LLC etc. “Individual” is not defined further. If one does not
know any better they would assume from that it means man. This ambiguity is
purposeful. Individual means an individual corporate entity of commerce or a man or
woman who willingly places him or her self in the office of “person” and is therefore
subject to the law. That is a man or woman who joined the club willingly. That is an
“individual”! The courts have further upheld this precedent. The UCC does not apply
to men, women or people.
What does this mean? It means when you walk into a court the judge presumes
that you are a person who has joined the club. The rule is that unless you clearly
state that you are non-compliant in the way the code tells you to do so then you are
presumed bound by your willing entry into a contract that gives the judge permission
to do anything with you as he sees fit. Your remedy is found under UCC 1-207.
Research it for yourself.
When did you enter into this contract? Most don’t even realize doing it. The most
common way is by using Federal Reserve Notes or “legal tender”. They used to put
on the note the words “non-negotiable”. Non-negotiable applies to contracts and
when a man uses this contract to buy needful things then they unwittingly join the
club and subject themselves to all the law the traitors in government can invent.
Wait a minute!
If it is a contract then I cannot be forced to be bound to its terms if I do not enter
into it willingly. That’s correct! If you go to the store and plop down a silver dollar
(or lawful money) the clerk will not take the money, or even know what it is in all
likelihood. Since they do not provide a reasonable lawful alternative to the colorable
money that has so completely monopolized every aspect of our lives then aren’t we
being forced to use it? The answer is
YES!
That is “the contract” is not valid or enforceable as one cannot be forced against
their will. Our problem in this country is we do not know any better and under the
law if we are ignorant of the law then we are subject to it. Every judge knows this
and every attorney has sworn not to educate you to the law. Remember:

Ignorance of the law is no excuse!

You might also like