You are on page 1of 16

‘‘


‘ ‘
‘‘  ‘‘

‘‘ ‘ ‘‘ ‘! ‘‘


O   O 
 
‘

½ 1660, the Crow , at that time Ki  Charles ½½, could o lo er afford the upke ep
½    
    of la d a d services to His subjects therefore he abolished old te ures a d allowed a



   
 statute law to be e acted for the sale of the la ds of the Crow 

        
!   ! 
      ½ the early days of the colo y at Bota y Bay, Gover or Philip could o ly tra sfer
 
   the ow ership from the Crow to the orii al settlers after omi ati  a parcel of
la d This the had to be surveyed, a d ive a Lot umber for ide tificatio 
½ ½ 
  
 
 

  
     
The officers of the Crow had the to make e tries i the reister of Lots The title
½      
 deed that e sued carried a Volume umber, folio umber a d the Lot umbers
     
    " # O $ 

     All la d i Australia was sold i to private ha ds throuh a Gra t i Fee Simple
           
 Title The ew ow er of this title was required to hold a Deed
  The orii al deeds were si ed by the Gover or of the State, after first determi i 
that all purchase mo ies had bee paid ³Now Know Ye that for and in

     
      consideration of the said sum for and on Our behalf well and truly paid into the
             Treasury of Our said State before these Presents are issued and of all and singular
  
 
    the premises, WE HAVE GRANTED and for Us Our heirs and Successors DO
HEREBY GRANT unto the said H.W.T, Heirs and Assigns.......subject nevertheless
  

        to the several and respective reservations hereinafter contained that We do Reserve
            unto Us Our Heirs and Successors all minerals«..´

   The Gover or si ed ³In witness whereof I have hereunto signed my name and
!  " 
    affixed my Seal«.´
# 
 
#  #  This the , is a very leal ½ strume t of Law, a Co tract with ot just with the Crow
via the Seal, but with the actual Soverei Majesty, his/her Heirs a d Successors
$ 
    
 This ½ strume t is a Deed i Trust with the curre t Quee Elizabeth as the
    
     Successor to the Crow  it is a Trust i ½ herita ce a d a Trust i Equity That
mea s that the act of purchase of a Gra t i Fee Simple Title carries the riht to pass
 #      #   
o the estate throuh a ½ herita ce, a riht which is protected by the Co stitutio al
 

 courts of Australia
!      
     
 A Trust i Equity is the purchaser¶s riht to retai his equity (equality) of value i
   his la d So that whe the Parliame t requires the resumptio of the la d the Crow
has sold, it must be u der Just Terms Compe satio 

d
  " # O  
%
‘‘
‘ There are 4 eleme ts of ow ership that are carried i a Fee Simple Title Deed
1 The purchase of a y structures or buildi s that are o the la d - tenements
1 Gra t i Fee Simple Title
2 The riht to build a y structures of a y ki d o the la d - messuages
6 Trespass
12 Permissio 3 The riht of ow ership of all atural eleme ts o the la d, to a i defi ite exte t
14 Ho our/Disho our above the la d, a d to the very ce tre of the earth ± corporeal hereditaments
17 Our Deed 4 The riht to use the la d i a y ma er i cludi  to waste the la d (Waste
bei  a leal term mea i  to take back to bare rock or destroy) ± incorporeal
Editor: hereditaments
Sue May es O   
O 
Farmers La d Ow ership Rihts i
1 Ow ership of a y water o the la d as water ca ot be ow ed, as it is moveable
Australia
You have o ly the use of the water while it is  the la d
flora@reach etcomau

1
‘‘
2 The riht to i jure a eihbour¶s e joyme t a d use of his of la d ow ership o ly You must have purchased your la d
property u der a Gra t i Fee Simple Title, must have paid for your
3 The riht to trespass o a other¶s la d without his la d i order to complete the sale, BEFORE the la d title
permissio  cha e ca be loded u der the Torre s Title system
Torre s Title is o ly able to  deali s or the ³chai of
! 
  " # O  title´ attached to the la d
This is the leal term for our ow ership We are proprietors of More importa tly, we ca ever ow our la d u der a
the Fee Simple Gra t Which mea s we operate the Title Torre s Title, because it does ot a d ever will allow for the
duri  the period of our ow ership Our proprietory rihts are ability to i herit A riht which is uara teed by the Quee ,
ofte called µ atural rihts¶ Her Heirs a d Successors
We hold a Proprietas plena ± full property, i cludi  ot o ly  $   
the title, but the usufruct, or exclusive riht to the use
This, however, is where the State & Federal Parliame ts are
O  
    participati  i removi  our ow ership
Our Gra t i Fee Simple Title deed lists the ew ow er as a O docume ts from the Australia Gover me t, Departme t
Te a t i Commo  of Families, Housi , Commu ity Services a d ½ die ous
This refers to the fact that we share a ½ terest i the la d Affairs it is stated ± ³The most common type of ownership is
with the Crow throuh the reservatio of the mi erals ³Torrens Title´«As long as any repayments on mortgages
However the o ly riht the Crow reserves is that listed o the are kept up to date and there are no government or council
Title Deeds Also, i the eve t that we die without heirs, the plans to resume the land, Torrens title ownership offers the
Crow resumes sole ow ership of the la d (escheat) most permanency. As a Torrens Title owners you are
responsible for the cost of all rates, services, maintenance
The refere ce to Commo is verificatio that our la d
and improvements to the property. Subject to regulations,
ow ership is a Commo Law eleme t, so removi  Commo
you can alter the building or property. ³
Law or Old System Title would i dicate that these are
attempts to remove proof of our Commo Law te a cy with The docume t does ot refer to a Gra t i Fee Simple Title i
the Crow i the form of Her Majesty Quee Elizabeth ½½, her a y ma er other tha Commo Law or Old System title
Heirs a d Successors ± who are ot Parliame ts O the Departme t of La ds website dictio ary it states -
 !" #   # % Title Conversionë The action taken within Land and Property
Information, Department of Lands to convert parcels of Old
No The eleme ts of ow ership i a Gra t i Fee Simple Title System land to Torrens title. It includes actions under Part
are attached to the la d itself We simply ma ae that IVA Real Property Act 1900 and the more recent Conversion
ow ership for a period of time To sell la d with o e or more Actions (CAs).
eleme ts removed is to sell somethi  completely differe t
A d to the call the la d title Fee Simple would be fraudule t The stateme t from the Dept of Families is a outriht lie
Torre s Title ca ever be how we ow our la d a d to state
For example, o e ow er may place atural eleme ts of la d it is, i a attempt to attach our la d ow ership to the rates
u der a cove a t, removi  these eleme ts from ow ership a d parliame tary acts which remove ow ership rihts, is
use, however at the mome t a sale is completed the ew ow er crimi al
has the retur of all rihts i here t i the Title
A d to replace Commo Law system titles (ie Fee Simple)
These rihts are ot the ow er¶s to remove or separate, they with Torre s Title is, i effect, the theft of our ow ership
belo  to the la d ½t has bee said that we simply attach rihts by parliame tary leislatio 
ourselves to the imme se rihts for the period of ow ership
O   O 
 
d
"  O %
³Alienation of land ± Charles II A.D. 1600
Ma y people believe they ow their la d u der a Freehold
Title They do ot! However, Public serva ts a d the IV. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that
docume ts they provide sometimes use the expressio all tenures hereafter to be created by the King¶s Majesty, his
Freehold for la d ow ership because it does ot carry the Heirs and Successors, upon any gifts or grants of any
rihts of the true title of Fee Simple manors, land, tenements or hereditaments, of any estate of
inheritance at the common law, shall be in free and common
A Freehold Title o ly ives the ow er the riht to buy, sell a d socage only, and not by knights service or in capite, and
i herit la d ± o other rihts are i cluded Freehold is a part shall be discharged of all wardship, value and forfeiture of
of the Fee Simple Title, the expressio bei  µmereable marriage, livery, primer siesin, ouster-le-main, aide pur fair
therei ¶ fitz Chivalier and pur file marrier; and law, stature, or
d
O
O % reservation to the contrary thereof in any wise
Remember back to the Reister that the early colo ial officials notwithstanding."
used to record the Lot umbers of la d? Free a d commo socae o ly ± tells us we do ot have a y
The issue of protecti  la d ow ership was very real, a d debts attached to our la d o ce we purchase it Reardless of
ofte mortaes etc were ot fou d prior to a purchase, so the a y law, statute or reservatio to the co trary
ew ow er had areas of jeopardy to co cer him Sir Robert
Torre s developed the La d Reistry to i clude every eleme t ½&!'½ O#!!½ O½( O ))
of the la d ow ership, i cludi  mortaes, lie s o
properties, etc, i order to allow a leitimate list of all the # *    
 
i terests attached to the deeds to be available to a pote tial Land held of the Crown in fee simple may be assured in  
ow er
 without licence and without fine and the person taking
Torre s Title is NOT a form of la d ow ership ½t is a record under the assurance shall hold the land of the Crown in the

2
‘‘
same manner as the land was held before the assurance "owner", in relation to land, means any person entitled to an
took effect. estate of freehold in possession in the land:
12 Charles II c 24-The Tenures Abolition Act 1660 -s 4. 37 (a) whether in  
  or for life or otherwise, and
Tenure (b) whether at law or in equity, and
All tenures created by the Crown by way of the alienation of (c) whether absolutely or by way of mortgage.
an estate in  
 in land after the commencement of
this Act shall be taken to be in free and common socage    
without any incident of tenure for the benefit of the Crown.   $     
!  - a ½ strume t ive from
This Act is Australia law a d duplicates the Abolitio of the over me t, a d co veyi  a riht, authority, or ra t to a
Te ures Act 1660 i stati  that we buy (take) a d are i dividual Familiarly termed a µpate t¶
assured (uara teed) our la d free of a y debts    $       ½
   +A leal docume t i
Alienation mea s to leally tra sfer title to a property i writi  such as a deed, co tract, will, bo d or lease
real property law   $    +A act evide ced by letters pate t
With no incidence of tenure mea s the Crow has o u der the reat seal, ra ti  somethi  from the ki  to a
holdi  or occupyi  riht over the la d subject
d(($# O)-)    $     "  #  + A freehold estate of
i herita ce, absolute a d u qualified ½t sta ds at the head of
# )O    estates as the hihest i di ity a d the most ample i exte t
A person who has acquired land from the Crown by way of si ce every other ki d of estate is derivable thereout, a d
purchase or exchange (other than a person who has mereable therei 
acquired land under a lease from the Crown by way of   $   
 ,A clause i a deed or other
exchange) under this Act has an estate 
 in the i strume t of co veya ce by which the ra tor creates a d
land. reserves to himself, some riht, i terest, or profit i the estate
'!!'O  O)  ra ted, which had o previous existe ce as such, but is first
# *.$   / 0 called i to bei  by the i strume t reservi  it such as re t, or
a easeme t
In this Part:

ñ  
             
C ½
       

% !  
  &   '  (" 
  
&#    
  )"*

*+  
 #!  ,  
- 
 
.  
&#   
'  
  
*+   
& ' 
/ $  
        
 *+ 01 0'    
, 
 #   

#  #    
-      
  
2 ! 
    &      '      
  
       - 
   
 
  



  
.  

  #  
 
3 !  
  
4 05          
6 
!     
  
. 
7 $&   '  ½    - !
 
   '  
   
) , $C- ! $C7 

½ $$ $C3

     
$    C33
C $     
  8.   

-  
  
  4 05 8
  ½
  8  9: 
CC ½
     

   # 
C% (    &   '    #   
C  
   
       
 

14       
           
    
             



      $9) 
#  
 
 
C2 ' 
#     


  
 
-  
-   
           
  # 

         


ATTORNEY: Were you prese t whe your picture ATTORNEY: So the date of co ceptio (of the baby) was Auust 8th?
was take ? W½TNESS: Yes
ATTORNEY: A d what were you doi  at that time?
W½TNESS: Would you repeat the questio ? W½TNESS: Uh

3
‘‘
"  O !


     $ ! 

     !  1 Ki /Quee -ow er of property co tracts/letters pate t with
1 Ow er of property co tracts with real estate ae t to put
over me t-real estate ae t to put la d o market
la d o market 2 Gover me t-real estate ae t fi ds buyer
2 Real estate ae t fi ds buyer 3 Gover me t-real estate ae t ha ds details of sale over to
3 Real estate ae t ha ds details of sale over to lawyers to
lawyers to fi alise betwee pote tial buyer a d seller
fi alise betwee pote tial buyer a d seller 4 Buyer si s co tract a d pays mo ey
5 Gover or si s co tract for ki /Quee to fi alise sale, the
4 Buyer si s co tract a d pays mo ey
Great Seal bei  the si ature, which he is authorized to use
5 Seller si s co tract to fi alise sale u der the Letters Pate t for the la d sale
6 Lawyers et paid for deal 6 Lawyers et paid for deal
7 Real estate ae t ets paid for the deal 7 Gover me t-real estate ae t ets paid for the deal
8 Seller ets paid for the la d 8 Ki /Quee -Seller ives their share of the sale to the
over me t-real estate ae t too

As the orii al Letters Pate t to the Gover me t-Real Estate Ae t was o ly to ive them permissio to sell the la d, the
Gover me t-Real Estate Ae t must be ive a ew Letters Pate t i order for t hem to claim further rihts over & above our la d
purchase
A d that Letters Pate t must have the ew "rihts" assumed over the sale of the la d by over me t si ed with the Great Seal /
Ki  or Quee ¶s si ature
Otherwise, if the Ki /Quee ± previous ow er of the property, has ot approved the details of the ew assumed "rihts"
over me t are claimi , the there is absolutely o leitimacy a d over me t-real estate ae t are acti  without of authority,
‘
therefore fraudule tly
‘
½f‘ over me t believes that they have this permissio the show us the Letters Pate t si ed with the Great Seal However, the last
Letters
‘ Pate t ra out i 1919 a d the British Cha cellery has verified there has bee o e si ce the 
‘
Have we as the Heirs a d Successors i riht of the Crow u der the Australia Co stitutio , ive Gover me t permissio to
co‘ ti ue to i trude i the Co tractual details of a Gra t i Fee Simple?
‘
‘
u
   
     
   
- ½  ; 
 ;

‘
 
 
;
  ;
   ; 
4 
‘ 9     ;
  
  

 
  
    u ! .   ' 
#' <C3/=
u  
    



    
   
 



 
  
 


  
   
 
 
  


 

 
u  
     
!"#$%&‘
(     >
             # ;
 
  
 
     
#  ‘‘ ‘ ‘
‘

‘
½ order to protect our property a d properly i form all who would e ter of our rihts, it is importa t (particularly today) to place No
E try si s o each e try ate to your property, a d keep your ates closed

~O 

 
O     ~ O 
O               
  !  
"
O #
Ruli s by the Hih Court of Australia ±
 Kuru v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 26 (12 Ju e 2008)
 New South Wales v ½bbett [2006] HCA 57 (2006) 231 ALR 485 (2006) 81 ALJR 427 (12 December 2006)
 Ple ty vs Dillo [1991] HCA 5 (1991) 171 CLR 635 FC 91/004 (7 March 1991)
 Geore v Rockett [1990] HCA 26 (1990) 170 CLR 104 (20 Ju e 1990)
 Halliday v Nevill [1984] HCA 80 (1984) 155 CLR 1 (6 December 1984)
 Commo wealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1 (9 Auust 1923)

4
‘‘
This si must be addressed to both perso s a d e tities as occupier of land has granted a licence to another to enter upon it
this covers both a y i dividual a d a y public / corporate is essentially a question of fact««.The most common instance of
official A perso may e ter throuh your ate a d proceed such an implied licence relates to the means of access, whether
to your fro t door, however a y i dicatio that e try is ot path, driveway or both, leading to the entrance of the ordinary
permitted mea s the perso is ow u der accusatio of suburban dwelling house½     
trespass    
     
  
     
³O ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘  ‘  ‘ ‘      1       
      
 ‘ ‘  ‘  ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘   ‘ ‘       

       
‘ ‘  ‘  ‘  ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ 
   

 
     2  the law will
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘  ‘  ‘   ‘ ‘  ‘ imply a licence in favour of any member of the public to go upon
 ‘ ‘  ‘   ‘ ‘   ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘‘ the path or driveway to the entrance of the dwelling for the
 ‘ ‘   ‘ purpose of lawful communication with, or delivery to, any person
½ Robson v Hallett [1967] 2 QB 939, Lord Parker CJ said in the house. Such an implied or tacit licence can be precluded or
(at 951): at any time revoked by express or implied refusal or withdrawal
u ‘   ‘‘‘   ‘  ‘  ‘  ‘‘ of it.
‘   ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ³The principle applies alike to officers of government and to
 ‘‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘‘  ‘‘ ‘‘
private persons. A police officer who enters or remains on
‘ ‘ u‘O‘  ‘  ‘ ! ‘‘ ‘ ‘‘
‘  ‘" ‘ ‘  ‘‘ ‘‘‘ private property without the leave and licence of the person in
 ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ possession or entitled to possession commits a trespass and acts
 ‘ ‘  ‘  ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘   ‘ ‘ ‘ outside the course of his duty unless his entering or remaining on
   ‘ the premises is authorized or excused by law.´
A si at your fro t e tra ce clearly i dicates that you do  ' "' ! " $5'OO )*++/. Ã$ 640 1*++/2 *7/ $%"
ot ive permissio u less by i vitatio therefore e try is */-16/8 *++/2
prohibited ½ formatio from QLD has i dicated that the ?      
 ,         
police will e ter throuh a ope ate reardless of the si ,  #           

       @
but ca ot ope o e Therefore, keep your ates closed   
  
1
- 
 
Police have also i dicated that they ca ot deliver a    #  
 
 

summo s past a proper Trespass si u less a felo y has ³It is the duty of a justice before issuing«.a warrant, to satisfy
bee committed u der the Crimes Act a d a warra t issued himself that there are grounds for suspecting and grounds for
#O ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘‘‘ $‘‘‘  ‘   ‘       
    
      #3   
 ‘ ‘  ‘   ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘  ‘    and that those grounds are reasonable.´
 ‘‘‘‘‘ ‘‘ ‘‘
 ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘   ‘  ‘ ³What is required by the law is that the justice of the peace
   ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘   ‘ should stand between the police and the citizen, to give real
‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘   ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ attention to the question of whether the information proffered by
 ‘‘‘‘ ‘ ‘‘ ‘   ‘‘ ‘ the police does justify the intrusion they desire to make into the
‘ ‘     ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘   ‘ ‘ privacy of the citizen and the inviolate security of his personal
  ‘‘‘‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ and business affairs.´
Lord Edmu d-Davis i Morris v Beardmore stated:‘ ‘ # ‘  ‘ ³When a statute prescribes that there must be µreasonable
‘‘‘‘‘‘ ‘ ‘‘‘ ‘ grounds¶ for a state of mind ± including suspicion and belief ± it
‘ ‘   ‘    ‘  ‘   ‘ ‘ ‘ requires the existence of facts which are sufficient to induce a
‘  ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ % ‘ ‘  ‘   ‘ ‘ state of mind in a reasonable person.´
 ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘  ‘    ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘
 ‘‘‘ &‘‘ ‘ ‘ ‘  ‘‘ ½ Feathers v Roers, Justice Simpso stated that the complai t
‘  ‘‘ must exist as a swor oath, otherwise the stateme ts made i the
Every Australia Parliame tary Act ow states that, u der that Act, complai t are immaterial A swor oath would be i a affidavit
public officials may e ter your property for the purposes of that form verified by oath or affirmatio 
Act Suspicio without proof is ot e ouh for a warra t to be issued
½ firmly believe that is ot true, ive the previous quotes Here
are otes from the 6 major Australia Hih Court Trespass cases
 %'
O&!%%
 )*++*.Ã$301*++*2*7*$%"493
we use to defi e our rihts i this area #$#+*://-17; *++*2
,              
  
A d remember, Lord Coke¶s quote #'‘ (‘ ‘
 
  #      
      
‘ ‘‘  ‘ ‘  ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
 1 
1
  
   
'‘)‘‘ ‘ ‘  
%  
 Ã%%& !
'(%% )*+,-. Ã$ ,/0 1*+,-2 *33
³Common law authority tends against (     
$%"*14  *+,-2
#    
 ) has been forbidden by the
,          #      
 person in possession and entitled to possession thereof.´ 
# ?


  
 

       

      ³Next, it is submitted that the statutory power to serve a

#       
 ,       summons, either personally or non-personally, carries with it the

 
1
-  right to make such entry on land as is necessary to effect
BRENNAN J ³This case is about privacy in the home, the service«..The grounds to justify to this fail. Police entry was
garden and the yard. It is about the lawfulness of police wrongful.´
entering on private premises without asking for permission. ³Serving a summons is not an µexecution under the process of
½
 
       
  any court of justice¶; it is simply the commencement of the
   
.´ process.´
Notes from the case: ³While the question whether an ³It would be incongruous for the common law to permit entry for

5
‘‘
the purpose of arrest in a few cases only but to permit entry ow ership that are carried i a Fee Simple Title Deed
for the purpose of serving a summons in every case 1 tenements
whatsoever.´
2 messuages

~!<<'OO)6//4.Ã$37016//4269*%"-,30
16//42,*%8"-671*6  6//42 3 corporeal hereditaments
,    

   
 
 ?   4 incorporeal hereditaments
 
     
 *½   First we must remember that ma y words have differe t leal
      
    ##   
 , 
words or had differe t orii al mea i s to our curre t
   

u dersta di 
µIt is well established that the tort protects the interest of the
plaintiff in maintaining the right to exclusive possession of her Therefore, the word Tenement i 1 does ot mea a hovel,
place of residence, free from uninvited physical intrusion by shacks, etc ½ a arrow se se it simply mea s buildi s,
strangers.´ however, i the broader se se as attached to a Fee Simple
Gra t, it mea s ot o ly the la d, but everythi  of a
³The common law fixes by various means a line between the perma e t & solid ature attached to the la d, so the
interests of the individual in personal freedom of action and buildi s, the re ts, the leases, etc
the interests of the State in the maintenance of a legally
ordered society. An action for trespass to land and an award ½ 2 Messuages is a term for dwelli  house ½ esse ce this
of exemplary damages has long been a method by which, at ow ership riht is permissio to build a d live o the la d
the instance of the citizen, the State is called to account by the At 3 & 4 we come to the Hereditame ts These are thi s
common law for the misconduct of those acting under or with capable of bei  i herited, i cludi  ot o ly the la d, but
the authority of the Executive Government.´ everythi  thereo 
Lord Devli i Huckle v Mo ey stated: ³the servants of the Corporeal Hereditaments are the ta ible/physical eleme ts of
government are also the servants of the people and the use of that i herita ce Accordi  to Blacksto e¶s Comme taries o
their power must always be subordinate to their duty of E lish Law 1765 (still used i the Hih Court of Australia
service.´ today): ´This consists of substantial and permanent elements
of the land ± the ground, soil, or earth whatsoever; as arable,
 5="= ! ~OO' 
~ )6//,. Ã$ 64 1*6 8 
meadows, pastures, woods, moors, waters, marshes, furzes,
6//,2
and heath. It legally includes buildings, as they use the land as

         
 
  their foundation. Water cannot be owned, but the land which
  
       
   
   

holds it can. ½ 
  
      
      
  
     
   #   #     $ 
     
       1     
 4   
    
         
  
  
 
 
  0
After the ma had asked the police to leave«´there was Incorporeal Hereditaments are the i ta ible eleme ts of that
neither statutory nor common law justification for the police i herita ce This is a riht issui  from the physical eleme t
remaining on the appellant¶s premises.´ of la d, such as re t, i comes from a e terprise o the la d
They are a riht to have a idea that will become physical o
S 357F Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)(3) Except as provided in the la d, ie to develop a busi ess a d produce a i come A
subsection (4), a member of the police force may not enter or i corporeal hereditame t is the thi s we do with our la d
remain in a swelling-house by reason only of an invitation i cludi  waste it
given as referred to in subsection (2) if authority to so enter or
remain is expressly refused by an occupier of the dwelling- Now i the case we are discussi , the dispute was betwee
house and the member of the police force is not so otherwise the State of NSW a d the Federal Gover me t over mi i 
authorizes (whether under this or any other Act or at common la d, which the Federal Gover me t were resumi  The
law) to so enter or remain. State wa ted full compe satio 
The case hi ed o 3 facts: As the dispute was about mi i , ma y comme ts were made
about the mi erals u der the surface of the rou d All of the
1.‘ an occupier of the swelling-house had invited the police followi  quotes from this case cover the facts stated i
to ³look around¶ the flat Corporeal Hereditame ts, that we ow all the atural eleme ts
2.‘ an occupier of the dwelling-house had then asked the of our la d from the top of the sky to the ce tre of the earth
police to leave
3.‘ the police officer did not leave and remained on the ³«..´land the property of a State´ covers the whole soil from
premises for longer than it would reasonably have taken the surface to the centre and everything which is physically
them to leave. incorporated in it including the Royal metals.´
³Regs 8 and 9 of the Police Regulations 2000 (NSW), coupled ³The power given by s13 Land Acquisition Act is to acquire
with ss6 and 201 of the Police Act, prescribes a form of oath µland¶, and prima facie that means to acquire the soil from the
or affirmation to be taken by a police officer under s13 of the surface to the centre.´
Police Act. The prescribed for of oath or affirmation ³«.by its definition of the word µland¶, enables the
contained a promise to µcause Her Majesty¶ peace to be kept Commonwealth to acquire interests in, or rights, powers or
and preserved««s201 of the Police Act made it an offence to privileges over, land as well as land in its ordinary meaning,
neglect or refuse to carry out any lawful duty as a police namely, µthat in respect of which you have a right from the
officer.´ centre of the earth to the heaven above.´
 $ ;;
'%OÃ!
~)*+69.Ã$9-01*+692 ³As a natural fact, gold and silver, neither more nor less than
99$%"*1+*+692 copper or tin or platinum or clay or oil, are part of the

           #        
concrete physical mass, commencing at the surface of the
 

  '   earth and extending downwards to the centre of the earth,
which is called µland.¶´
Remember previously ½ ave details of the 4 eleme ts of

6
‘‘
³«.trees growing on the land are, according to the received perfect accuracy (    
    
      1

legal definition of µland¶, regarded as part of it.,,´ u less - A  ); µIn the language of the English law, the word
reserved to the Crow  fee signifies an estate of inheritance as distinguished from a
Whe resumi  la d«´the full contents of the parcel of less estate; «.A fee simple is the most extensive in quantum,
land pass; the ¶land¶ being measured superficially by metres and the most absolute in respect to the rights which it confers,
and bounds and extending actually downward indefinitely of all estates known to the law  ½   
  
    
and notionally upward indefinitely, is that which is µpassing      
 

      
to the Commonwealth¶ ³ whe the resumptio occurs  4 
     
      
   
            
Ma y properties are ow faced with Mi i  compa ies            
 5     
assessi  the la d for the mi erals u der the soil O ce   

 
 
 
  
mi ers had to pay full royalties for whatever they fou d i            4    
 
your la d Si ce the 1950¶s approx, the over me t  
    

6   7

 
 
 
restricted that to the top 6 i ches  
   
    
    
 
  
Did the over me t have a Letters Pate t to re-e ter our la d      
  
 0
i this ma er a d reduce our i come from our la d? ½ C           

effect, they removed part of our ½ corporeal Hereditame ts ±    
a riht sold to us by the Ki /Quee who reserved the
mi eral rihts, it is true, but ot a y royalty i come via a ³Real Property Act 1900 provides by s13, as follows: (1) All
depth i the soil A d this has led most people to believe waste lands««when alienated in fee, be subject to the
they o ly purchase the top 6 i ches of the soil Not true provisions of this Act. (2) the grants of such land shall be in
Absolutely ot true A d clearly verified by this Hih Court duplicate, and every such grant, in addition to proper words
case, which is still curre t i Australia law, bei  a CLR of description, shall contain a diagram of the land thereby
case ± law precede t case granted on such scale as the Governor directs, and shall be
delivered to the Registrar-General, who shall register the
C       
   same in manner hereinafter directed.´
Whe we purchase the la d, the Crow uara tees that we ³It will be observed that it is only when land in this class is
buy that la d free a d clear Remember that the Abolition of µalienated in fee¶ by the Crown that it becomes subject to the
Tenures Act 1660 & theImperial Acts Application Act 1969 - provisions of the Act«««Unless there has been an
SECT 36 both co firmed that we take o o debt throuh the alienation by Crown grant of an estate in fee simple, the
purchase of the la d This case ow tells us how the Registrar-General is no authorized by the real Property Act to
Commo wealth Gover me t do resume the la d free a d take any step in the direction of registration or bringing the
clear also land under the Act, or issuing a certificate of title thereto.
³«the lands have vested in the Commonwealth for an Unless««there is nothing which the Act authorizes the
absolute and unconditionable estate in fee simple freed and Registrar-General to enter in the register-book and against
discharged from all reservations, rights, royalties, conditions which he can record any instrument, dealing, or matter
and obligations of any kind whatsoever to the State of NSW.´ affecting such land.´
³«and be freed and discharged from all trusts, obligations; ³His action is a State service, not an individual service.´
estates, interests, contracts, licences, charges, rates, and C        

easements, to the intent that the legal estate therein, together
with all rights and powers incident to«..´ ³s27 Land Acquisition Act 1906, it is provided that where any
Crown land is acquired by compulsory process the State shall
³The word µland¶ is, and has been«.defined by S5 of the be entitled to compensation, to be estimated as if the State
Lands Acquisition Act as including µany estate or interest¶ in were the proprietor of an estate in fee Simple.´
land ± legal or equitable ± and any easement, right, power,
or privilege over, in, or in connection with land«´ ³Clearly, since the Lands Acquisition Act 1906 was passed
under the power granted in s51(xxxi) of the Constitution, any
³No implied limitation can be placed on the fullest meaning µproperty¶ specified in the statute may be taken provided ³just
that can be given to the word µproperty¶ in s51(xxxi) and s85 terms´ are available by law. Clearly also the same results
of the Australian Constitution.´ must follow in the case of land taken compulsorily under the
³s22 Acts Interpretation Act 1901«so as to include statute as in the case of the Constitution. The Constitution
µmessuages, tenements and hereditaments, corporeal and suo vigore passes instanter on the transfer of the
incorporeal, of any tenure or description, and whatever may µDepartments¶ the property used in connection therewith; the
be the estate or interest therein¶ and µestate¶ to include µany statute, under constitutional authority, passes, when its
estate or interest, charge, right, title, claim, demand, li en or conditions are satisfied, the property taken for the µpurposes¶
incumbrance at law or in equity¶«.´ indicated. The result, however, must in each case be the
³«sec 16(1) of the Act applies: so that the land decribed in same, because in each case the Constitution is the ultimate
the notifications became vested in the Commonwealth µfreed basis of title.´ ³here we deal with«.a Constitution
and discharged from all trusts, obligations, estates, distributing property and powers between different organs of
interestes, contracts, licences, charges, rates and easements, the King¶s government.´
to the intent that the legal estate therein, together with all ³Where any land (other than Crown land) is acquired by
rights and powers incident thereto or conferred by this Act, compulsory process, the owner of the land shall, if deprived of
shall be vested in the Commonwealth.´ the land in whole or in part, be entitled to compensation
³«.S17 (of the Act)includes not only the corporeal land but under this Act (Land Acquisition Act 1906).´
every interest therein, and any easement, right, power or ³17 sub-section2 says: the compensation shall be estimated as
privilege over, in or in connection with that land.´ if the State were the proprietor of an estate in fee simple in the
³From Challis¶s Real Property, 3 rd ed., p218, it is stated with land, subject to any estate or interest which any person had in

7
‘‘
the land at the time of its acquisition by the pri ciples
Commonwealth.´         ½  
 ± Ge eral term de oti  property
µs5, Interpretations, Lands Acquisition Act 1906, the word i la d or chattels Particularly a y riht i the ature of
µowner¶ includes, with respect to the land, µany person who property, but less tha the title a partial or u divided riht a
under this Act is enabled to sell or convey the land to the title to share
Commonwealth¶; and µland¶ includes any estate or interest             > Tra sfer of property a d
in land (legal or equitable) and any easement, right, power possessio s of la ds, te eme ts, or other thi s from o e
or privilege over, in or in connection with land. The owners perso to a other Absolute co veya ce of real property
of such outside interest appear to be entitled to all costs,
charges and expenses of all conveyances and assurances of         ½   
 > Lati : refers to property
the interests (s61 (1)(a)); and this right would be anomalous tra sfers betwee livi  perso s, as opposed to i herita ce
if such owners were not also entitled to compensation.´      $ 
 >A ift of real property by
will, by i herita ce
     #  >Lati : e ery, viour 
   
     ½
  >prese tly to, upo
       ½   ± where circumsta ces a d ot
words appear to create a i te tio  $     reservatio s, royalties, co ditio s, obliatio s,
trusts, co tracts, lice ces, chares, rates, title, claim, dema d,
     O ± A leal wro  committed upo a
lie or i cumbra ce at law or i equity¶, to the i te t that the
perso or property, ie trespass, theft, etc
leal estate therei , toether with all rihts a d powers, every
        #  ± A leislatory act, e acted i terest therei , a d a y easeme t, power or privilee over, i
a d established by the will of the over me t of the day or i co ectio with that la d ± all the words used to co vey
        ± Not moder civil law ± those eleme ts that the Gra t i Fee Simple title is free from o
comes from A lo-Saxo times ± relates to over me t, alie atio  This is how we purchase our la d from the
security of perso a d property, derivi  from a cie t Ki /Quee , this is how the Commo wealth resume la d from
usaes a d customs ± fixed a d immutable rules a d private ow ership a d the States¶ co trol
pri ciples The backrou d to Commo Law is biblical 

ñ  
         
C ?     
 
    

      
 
  
 # 
      
 
         
 ?

  B        1 #          
 #    
 ,     B    
  
- $ 
 $
       
  
   # 
  

 
 $          B    
   

C  # 8
   
 

 

 ?  
             
.  #    
1
-  
:  
C 
   
#      
    
         
     
       
    

CC $ 
      
    D @  
 
 #          ½       


  
 
   
½    #    9: E   ½
  
C ½  #    
     
 
 ½    
   #  A    -    
 ½   
 #     

C $ ½      ##   $
 #         # 

  


   
 
C $ $

#      
#       
 
   
 
 
&   '  ½ 
 
 @  
     
C ,       
 #        #  #        D     @   
  
  
 0:    # 
   # #        #  
 
 
    
     :  
 
 
C 
  #        
  
- 
     #  
 

C $&   '  - !½     ?
        
    -#   
C F   - !  9:  ½
    
  

8
‘‘
" ‘ (1) The holder of a authority is e titled to a riht of way
(to be i dicated or described i the ma er prescribed by the
½f we have superior rihts over our la d, that ca ot be removed reulatio s) betwee the la d subject to the authority a d a
without ether trespass a d/or compe satio applyi , how the public road
do over me ts both claim a d e force their riht over ours
(6) A riht of way is subject to such co ditio s as to its
½t ca o ly be with our permissio  Yet every over me t acts exercise, a d to such exceptio s as to the la d over which it
tells us that the releva t e tity/public official already has may be exercised, as may be prescribed by the reulatio s
permissio ! or as may be imposed by a warde pursua t to a i quiry
% $% ('"
;'
O$O*++9 u der subsectio (7)
*+*  (7) A warde may hold a i quiry i to a y matter arisi 
u der, or i co ectio with, a riht of way co ferred by
(1) For the purpose of e abli  a cou cil to exercise its this sectio 
fu ctio s, a cou cil employee (or other perso ) authorised by a
cou cil may e ter a y premises (8) Such a i quiry may be held o the warde ¶s ow
motio or o the applicatio of a y la dholder affected by,
(2) E try may o ly be made at a y reaso able hour i the or the holder of a y authority e titled to, the riht of way
daytime or at a y hour duri  which busi ess is i proress or is
usually carried o at the premises *44=   
*+-=  (1) ½f la d subject to a authority i cludes the surface of the
la d, the holder of the authority must ot:
(1) Reaso able force may be used for the purpose of ai i 
e try to a y premises (other tha reside tial premises) u der a (a) use water artificially co served o that la d, or
power co ferred by this Part, but o ly if authorised by the (b) fell trees, strip bark or cut timber o that la d,
cou cil i accorda ce with this sectio  otherwise tha i accorda ce with the co se t of a y
(2) The authority of the cou cil: la dholder of the surface of the la d or, if such a la dholder
refuses co se t or attaches u reaso able co ditio s to the
(a) must be i writi , a d co se t, with the approval of a warde 
(b) must be ive i respect of the particular e try co cer ed,
a d (2) ½f la d subject to a mi i  lease i cludes the surface of
(c) must specify the circumsta ces which are required to exist the la d, the holder of the lease must ot:
before force may be used (a) depasture horses o the la d, or keep o the la d a y
6//                do that is ot kept u der effective co trol, u less the la d
  is securely fe ced, or
The powers of e try a d i spectio co ferred by this Part are (b) remove rock or earth from the la d, except i co ectio
ot exercisable i relatio to that part of a y premises bei  with mi i  operatio s, otherwise tha with the co se t of
used for reside tial purposes except: the la dholder of the surface of the la d
(a) with the permissio of the occupier of that part of the 9,9<$        >  
premises, or  
(b) if e try is ecessary for the purpose of i specti  work (1) This sectio applies i relatio to:
bei  carried out u der a approval, or (a) the requireme ts of sectio s 31, 49, 62 a d 188 that
(c) u der the authority co ferred by a search warra t certai rihts ca ot be exercised or leases or mi eral
claims ca ot be ra ted except with the writte co se t of
*++   a perso or perso s specified i the releva t sectio , a d
(1) A power co ferred by this Part to e ter premises, or to make (b) the provisio i sectio 81 that certai operatio s may
a i spectio or take other actio o premises, may ot be be carried out with the co se t of the la dholder, a d
exercised u less the perso proposi  to exercise the power is
i possessio of a authority a d produces the authority if (c) the requireme t of sectio 140 that certai operatio s
required to do so by the ow er or occupier of the premises may ot be carried out otherwise tha i accorda ce with a
access arra eme t areed with each la dholder or
(2) The authority must be a writte authority which is issued by determi ed by a arbitrator as referred to i sectio 140 (b),
the cou cil a d which: a d
(a) states that it is issued u der this Act, a d (h) the requireme t of sectio 265 (4) that rihts ca ot be
(b) ives the ame of the perso to whom it is issued, a d exercised u less the amou t of compe satio payable to a
(c) describes the ature of the powers co ferred a d the source la dholder i respect of a mi i  area is the subject of a
of the powers, a d valid areeme t or of a assessme t
(d) states the date (if a y) o which it expires, a d
(e) describes the ki d of premises to which the power exte ds, 6**" >   
a d (1) The holder of a mi eral claim is e titled to a riht of
(f) bears the si ature of the e eral ma aer way (to be i dicated or described i the ma er prescribed
(3) This sectio does ot apply to a power co ferred by a search by the reulatio s) betwee the claim area a d a public
warra t road
-         
 B    
   (6) A riht of way is subject to such co ditio s as to its

        
 
  exercise, a d to such exceptio s as to the la d over which it
   

        may be exercised:
;

$O*++6 (c) as may be imposed by a warde pursua t to a i quiry
*4-" >    u der subsectio (7)
(7) A warde may hold a i quiry i to a y matter arisi 

9
‘‘
u der, or i co ectio with, a riht of way co ferred by  
this sectio  (1) A authorised officer may, o a y property lawfully e tered
(8) Such a i quiry may be held o the warde ¶s ow u der sectio 69A, do a ythi  that i the opi io of the
motio or o the applicatio of a y la dholder affected authorised officer is ecessary to be do e for the purposes referred
by, or the holder of a y mi eral claim e titled to, the riht to i that sectio , i cludi  (but ot limited to) the thi s specified
of way i subsectio (2)
(9) ½ the case of la d withi a mi eral claims district, the (2) A authorised officer may do a y of the followi :
co ditio s imposed by a warde pursua t to a i quiry (a) make such exami atio s, i quiries a d tests as the authorised
u der subsectio (7) must ot be i co siste t with the officer co siders ecessary (i cludi  the sca i  of a compa io
co ditio s specified i a y reistered access ma aeme t a imal to ascertai its ide tificatio i formatio ),
pla applyi  to the la d (b) take such photoraphs, films, audio, video a d other recordi s
*        
 # 
 as the authorised officer co siders ecessary,
 
 
 
 ? @ -    (c) require records (i cludi  certificates of reistratio i relatio
   # #       to a compa io a imal) to be produced for i spectio ,


(d) exami e, i spect a d copy a y records,
$ ;


;%~$O*++3
(e) seize a ythi  that the authorised officer has reaso able
4+    rou ds for believi  is co ected with a offe ce u der this Act
(1) A authorised officer may, at a y reaso able time, or the reulatio s,
e ter a y property for a y of the followi  purposes: (f) do a ythi  else the authorised officer is empowered to do
(a) to seize or secure a y compa io a imal that the u der this Act
officer is authorised to seize or secure u der this Act, (3) The power to seize a ythi  co ected with a offe ce
(b) to determi e whether there has bee complia ce with, i cludes a power to seize:
or a co trave tio of, this Act or the reulatio s (a) a thi  with respect to which the offe ce has bee committed,
(2) Before e teri  a y property u der this sectio , a a d
authorised officer must ive the occupier of the property (b) a thi  that will afford evide ce of the commissio of the
reaso able otice of the i te tio to e ter the property offe ce, a d
u less:
(c) a thi  that was used for the purpose of committi  the offe ce
(a) e try is made with the co se t of the occupier of the
property, or A refere ce to a y such offe ce i cludes a refere ce to a offe ce
that there are reaso able rou ds for believi  has bee
(b) e try is, i the opi io of the authorised officer, committed
required ure tly because of the existe ce or reaso able
likelihood of a serious risk to the health or safety of a y 4+$=     
perso or a imal, or The fu ctio s of a authorised officer u der sectio s 69A a d 69B
(c) e try is made for the purposes of seizi  or securi  a may be exercised with the aid of assista ts a d with the use of
do u der sectio 18, or reaso able force
(d) the ivi  of the otice would, i the opi io of the 
 $         
   
authorised officer, defeat the purpose for which it is  C        (  
        
i te ded to e ter the property  :  
   
 0   
(3) The powers of e try co ferred by this sectio are ot There are a reat ma y more over me t acts that carry similar
exercisable i relatio to a y part of premises used o ly stateme ts While they me tio requesti  permissio , they also
for reside tial purposes except: state they ca e force their rihts without that permissio 
(a) with the permissio of the occupier of the premises, or No e of which is supported by the Hih Court cases
(b) u der the authority co ferred by a search warra t ½f othi  i these cases supports a riht of e try by over me t,
u der sectio 69D the questio still sta ds ± how do they assume they have e try?
4+<             


  
C !  "     "    "
  #"  $ 
  
          
 $           ñ   "    
   %&    "         
 '
           
     

    " 
 '
            #
 "#
 "(  " 
 )  " 
 $    "  "  
 $    
   "*   "+   , 


10
‘‘
First let us look at the structure of over me t   #   (      

O '   

 (  ) "(**
  -
 ˜  
 

  
  + ,- . '/  
 $ 
.'  
(

  /
 ,  0
 /
 '    &  /&
1  2 O    
  
 ˜
  
'3

   

  
 4 

  
   

 
5 6 

3  
         

     (#      
    0 1#  
    (
# (  (
O                 
O  
   
 

    
        $ ?#the people are the

    
 
    ‘‘‘
Commo wealth«the people areed to u ite««the a 
    ‘‘
Commo wealth is i dissoluble (able to be
dissolved)«with our areeme t we formed the The basic pri ciple is simple ±
Commo wealth«so it would take our areeme t to  Our Co stitutio al basis for mo ey is old a d silver
dissolve it  Therefore the amou t of old a d silver i the ba ks defi ed
Althouh Quee Victoria did ot si the Australia the amou t of mo ey available i the commu ity
Co stitutio i to existe ce due to ill ess she was prese t i  Duri  the war there was ot e ouh, the old sta dard was
the room whe it was si ed a d clearly areed to it lifted a d credit e tered
 After the war all over me ts were faced with the task of
½ doi  so, she surre dered her Heirs & Successors rihts
payi  off the debt at the same time as havi  to borrow to
i to the ha ds of the people µu der Australasia´ She ave
rebuild the cou try
the people of Australia the Soverei ty, a d to the
 Ba ks areed to co ti ue loa i , the debt was ever to be
Parliame t she ave the task of mai tai i  the rihts a d
assets    $    repaid, as lo  as i terest payme ts were met
 Gover me t could ot create that co tract without assets,
The Commo wealth of Australia is reistered with the US therefore the people were used as the asset, their labour
Securities & Excha e Commissio (0000805157) ± creati  taxes which the paid the i terest o the debt
busi ess address 1601 Massachusetts Ave ue, NW, c/o  ½ order to adhere the people to this co tract (without their
Australia Embassy, Washi to , DC, 20036 co se t) a form of areeme t was created via reistratio 
All the departme ts a d public e tities of the  Birth Certificate reistered our childre u der the
Commo wealth of Australia are ow co trolled throuh corporatio  The certificate is o bo d paper a d carries a
o -accou table Corporatio s, each carryi  their ow umber which allows over me t to borrow $1 millio per
ABN umber child
These corporatio s ow admi ister the leislative acts  The birth certificate is used to e roll the child i areas such
produced by both State a d Federal Gover me t as educatio , ba ki , etc u til the child is of adult ae
 At adult ae, the child must make their ow areeme t,
What commo wealth is reistered? Certai ly ot the o e
which is via electoral reistratio , vehicle reistratio , etc
   #
 The Marriae Certificate is listed i 3 US State Marriae
Did the people of the Commo wealth ive a areeme t Acts as allowi  the State to become the third AND primary
via refere dum for this Corporative commo wealth party to the marriae
structure?  Medical careers require reistratio for i sura ce purposes
---------------  Mortaes also require i sura ce reistratio 
˜           -         Tradesme are required to ai Gold Card reistratio to


             
 
 establish their crede tials Home Builders must reister
-    
    #        
  Teachers are required to complete either a deree or a course
&#  B& 
&#   
'  of trai i  that is used i TAFE¶s a d other over me t
˜     !8  #   i stitutio s
             
 '       ½ order to work i over me t places, certai perso such as
#   $ 
        urses & teachers are forced to be i oculated i order to


-   <½ 'C   $ ! keep their jobs

 
     
    =
 Our ba k accou ts require verificatio from birth certificates,
! #   +        G-  passports, lice ces, etc i order to be approved
!H  Etc, Etc
-----------------
How the does this relate to ivi  over me t permissio ?
Clearly, all the listed Acts a d i cludi  the ma y others
made by a Corporate over me t which have ot bee ½ almost every case permissio is i the reistratio a d with
prepared with refere ce to the Australia Co stitutio , la d it appears to be the Torre s Title reistratio 
carry o respect for Commo Law, as they are acti  to %@ A%  $        
completely remove Commo Law rihts of la d ow ership  !  #
How ca the Commo wealth of the people operate u der a Whe we purchase our la d u der a Gra t i Fee Simple title,
corporatio if the corp itself is a child of the Co stitutio ? the lawyer prepares the Torre s Title reistratio process at the
How ca the people of the Commo wealth be forced to same time We do ot otify our local cou cil of the cha e of
obey laws that are ot Commo Law without refere dum? ow ership, however they are obviously i formed because you
promptly receive a Rati  Notice

11
‘‘
   769 %  !   *++9B%     $     #   ± A alleatio  a declaratio
 !    of matters of fact
(1) A co veya ce or tra sfer u der this Divisio vests the la d At o stae do we receive a Bill from Cou cil ½ stead we
i the purchaser for a estate i fee simple freed a d receive a Notice that tells us we are required to pay
dischared from all trusts, obliatio s, estates, i terests, ½s this volu tary or is it forced?
co tracts a d chares, a d rates a d chares u der this Act or
a y other Act, but subject to: Clearly, as is show u der s713, it is forced, a d u der
Australia law all Co tracts carry the followi  requireme ts
(a) a y reservatio s or co ditio s for the be efit of the Crow
affecti  the la d, a d 1 Offer a d Accepta ce
(b) a y easeme ts, restrictive cove a ts, positive public 2 $  (e erally, the supply of mo ey, property
cove a ts created i accorda ce with sectio 88D or 88E of or services)
the Conveyancing Act 1919 a d public rihts of way affecti  3   are performed (for i sta ce, most co tracts
the la d i volvi  real estate must be i writi 
   3-4     BÃ 4 That the parties         
 !
5 $  i what the co tract requires to be do e, or
(1) A rate or chare is levied o the la d specified i a rates restricts from bei  do e a d,
a d chares otice by the service of the otice
6 That the parties have $  to e ter i to a co tract (ie
(2) The otice may be served at a y time after 1 July i the
me tal capacity, or i the case of corporatio s, that they are
year for which the rate or chare is made or i a subseque t
authorised to do so)
year
½t is illeal u der Australia law to force a yo e i to a
(3) A otice that is required to effect a adjustme t of rates or
Co tractural arra eme t aai st their areeme t or without
chares may be served i the year for which the rate or chare
all the facts of the co tract bei  disclosed
is made or a subseque t year
(4) The otice may i clude more tha o e rate, more tha o e Are all the facts of a rati  otice disclosed? Not if we have
chare a d more tha o e parcel of la d to be forced by duress i to it So, aai how do we aree?
(5) ½t is ot ecessary to specify the ame of the rateable Very simply The Rati  Notice is a U ilateral Co tract You
perso or the perso liable to pay the chare i the otice if the are u der o obliatio to aree to the co tract You simply
cou cil does ot k ow the perso ¶s ame pay the listed amou t by the due date a d the co tract
becomes leal a d e forceable As this Co tract is based o
O     7*9B~    
la d, it must be dealt with i a Commo Law court
  B   
Now cou cil also expect us to apply a d pay for such thi s as
(1) For the purposes of this Divisio , a rate or chare is
Developme t Applicatio s o our la d ½t is stated that this is
overdue if:
i order to harmo ise the reside tial, busi ess, i dustrial
(a) i the case of vaca t la d, it has remai ed u paid for more developme t i a area, to e sure buildi s are sou d a d safe
tha o e year, or for the public, to assist i road creatio , etc
(b) i the case of a y other la d, it has remai ed u paid for ½ plai fact, it is about reve ue U der Commo law, a la d
more tha 5 years, ow er must ot cause disturba ce a d distress to his
from the date o which it became payable eihbour¶s ow ership, a d this ca be mediated i a commo
(2) A cou cil may, i accorda ce with this Divisio : law court No cou cil i sures a buildi  project, the home
ow er must carry his ow i sura ce i order to protect the
(a) sell a y la d (i cludi  vaca t la d) o which a y rate or
e eral public Road creatio is a cost that properly should be
chare has remai ed u paid for more tha 5 years from the
date o which it became payable, a d carried by the road taxes a d the federal taxes
(b) sell a y vaca t la d o which a y rate or chare has A d more importa tly, it is ot o ly a illeal impositio over
remai ed u paid for more tha o e year but ot more tha 5 the rihts i here t i a Gra t i Fee Simple title, but it is also a
years from the date o which it became payable, but o ly if: co tractural arra eme t that allows cou cil permissio to
e ter our property a d exami e other facets of our ow ership
So from sectio 723 which accepts our sale rihts, sudde ly by
sectio 546 & 713 Cou cil have permissio to both levy rates The we look at Zo i  As zo i  is ot leitimately
a d resume la d for u paid rates attached to our Deed, it ca ot be e forced over the Fee
Simple title (more to come)
How?
Now with reard to the Mi i  Act, it also uses a form of
Well, let¶s look at the Rati  Notice itself The first clue is
coercio to bri  about our areeme t to e try, by stati  that
that it is a Notice ½ rece tly spoke to a you  fellow from
if we do disaree i a y area, the matter ca be take to the
Lawli k to do with a leal accou t
Warde ¶s Court
Our co versatio we t like this ±
What you are ot told is that the Warde ¶s court is created
Him ± ³Was it a bill?´ u der the Mi i  Act, a d is therefore a e tity of the
Me ± ½ do ot believe so, ½ thi k it was a Stateme t over me t As it is the over me t acti  for the Crow that
Him ± You should o ly pay o a bill authorises the mi eral leases over our la d, this could ot be
a u biased court
   $    7 - The creditor¶s writte stateme t of
his claim, specifyi  the items Nor is it is Commo Law court, a d remember, our Gra t i
Fee Simple title is a Commo Law ½ strume t, which reserves
  $   ( ± ½ formatio of a act to be do e o ly the mi eral rihts a d o other riht o our la d,
or required to be do e especially ot trespass

12
‘‘
I1 
     

‘‘
We are  a democracy we are a co stitutio al Christia
O                    Mo archy a d it is ot possible to be both O ly a republic
à :$    CO ' O %D ca be a democracy
                  
  #C  0!   E       $       ± ½ the Law of Co tracts a
0     Ã 0           areeme t, co ve tio or promise of two or more parties, by
     C  # deed, i writi , si ed, sealed a d delivered, by which either
of the parties pledes himself to the other that somethi  is
        $  ± A sealed ½ strume t, co tai i  a either do e or shall be do e, or stipulates for the truth of
co tract or cove a t, delivered by the party to be bou d certai facts
thereby, a d accepted by the party to whom the co tract or
cove a t ru s So, Her Majesty Quee Victoria, has pleded throuh her
authority as the protector of the i herita ce of the Crow
Now it is worth co sideri  the fact that a Deed also evokes a (which is God the Father, Jesus Christ a d the Holy Spirit), to
Cove a t, because a cove a t is a very importa t word Cove a t with us throuh this Gra t of la d, this Deed of
½ previously me tio ed that the basis of Commo Law was Trust A d because she ives a µPower of Attor ey¶ i the
biblical Let¶s look at the Coro atio Ceremo y of Quee form of the Letters Pate t to her serva ts the Parliame t of
Elizabeth ½½ Australia, the Gover ors a d Gover or-Ge eral, they are
C 9C 
  
    4  &   I½         bou d by that plede just as surely as if it were their mouth
     
      C   that had spoke the words, their heads that had carried the
 
  1    Crow , a d their ha ds that had accepted the scepter a d the
% '
    1    #   orb
  A  
-

#  Whe these e tities of corporate over me t dare to attempt
 '
 
   -
  F         
 to steal that which is ot theirs i the form of this cove a t
  

'
  )  # 1    relatio ship over our la d, they are spiritually breaki  the
/ '
 
- 


  

 Word of God, wherei He promised to us, throuh Victoria,

- A  -
1   
  
 Her Heirs & Successors, the free occupatio of our la d
    ------ § ------
2 !   '
    
    
     1     
  ;
   
'
- B -
 
        
 
 
   $
('&
$
$O*+*+
    
       1  69<     
6 '
    
A  -

   
1  (1) No assura ce of la d shall be valid to pass a i terest at
         
 '
   
 1 
  law u less made by deed 
   
  1
3/"   
6 
  
 '
   1          
u)  uu)  ;u   
  
   (1) Every riht of e try, co ti e t remai der, a d every
 
 co ti e t or executory or future estate, riht, or i terest, or
7 F 
       u   # u   $  ,  possibility coupled with a i terest, i property, may be

         
        co veyed by deed
#    BB  1     #    1  (2) A y co veya ce of a prese t riht of e try i a y la d,

  
#   #   ; '
    1 

other tha a co veya ce to the perso i possessio thereof,
<'

   
 >#    
  

= 1  u,# - u   1  F      a d a y cove a t or areeme t for, or promise of a

    : '
 1 )$  co veya ce (other tha as aforesaid) of the same shall be
     ! void as aai st the perso i possessio or those claimi 
 '
    u der him or her u less the perso co veyi  or cove a ti ,
areei , or promisi  to co vey, or the perso throuh
C'
   #     whom he or she claims has bee i possessio of the la d
11(
 
 '
# 1   withi twelve mo ths from the date of the co veya ce,
12½   
   '

 
  ; > 
   
 cove a t, areeme t or promise
'
   


            "
   ± o o e ca tra sfer a ½ terest i our la d
 #  without holdi  the deed Remember a ½ terest is a partial
Quee Elizabeth has publicly declared that the Bible is the µow ership¶ A Mortae is a ½ terest u til such time as the
reatest book o earth That µbook¶ must be used to make a mo ey is fi ally paid, he ce the ba k holds the deeds At all
swor oath, it must be fou d i every court i this la d, times we must k ow where our deeds are ½f we are to
politicia s are required u der the Australia Co stitutio to protect our la d ow ership we must hold the deeds
swear their oath to the people of the commo wealth o that ½ formatio has bee ive to us to i dicate that ba ks are
µbook¶ ot providi  the deeds whe the mortae is cleared a d it
O    $   has take some people over 6 mo ths to et their deeds
½$F  
½  
       Whe they have bee retur ed the deeds are stamped
1  *+  5  I 1 
       ! a d have holes pu ched i them Other
  '"19!,*9&".J i formatio has i dicated that the releva t over me t
O   $   departme ts i QLD have bee destroyi  ot o ly deeds,
but a y docume t carryi  the Seal of the Crow 
½$F              
½ 
  
            1  *+  5 A rece t case i America co cer ed the Deutscheba k

13
‘‘
foreclosi  o 13 home ow ers The court dema ded the ba k the Register shall, except in case of fraud,    
 
produce the deeds to prove their riht of debt They were ot
6 
 

   

and such entries,
able to a d the court refused to allow the foreclosure At the if any, 
      but 
   
poi t of the mortae bei  si ed, the ba k sells the debt o to   

   

  
  8
other customers, sometimes oi  throuh 3-4 ha ds
Barwick CJ said i Breskvar v Wall:
Therefore it is more commo tha ot that the ba k does ot
have your deeds a y more a d will ot be able to fi d them "The Torrens system of registered title ... is not a system of
registration of title but a system of title by registration. That
½ that eve t, apply to the court for a ew copy which the certificate of title describes is not the title which
#    ± Your deeds i dicate all the rihts o your la d the registered proprietor formerly had, or which but for
Which mea s that your deeds carry your title, a y reservatio s, registration would have had. The title it certifies is not
a y mortaes, a y easeme ts, e cumbra ces, etc They are historical or derivative. ½ 
       
 
the leal proof of your rihts o your la d ½f it is ot attached 


    8
to your deed, is has o leitimacy over your la d These 3 cases clearly show that othi  ca be attached to
Three importa t Hih Court cases verify our la d rihts via the our title without our permissio , whether it is a mortae, or
Torre s Title reister a easeme t or whatsoever However, over me t
 %
F
OÃ'"!<%)*+9/.Ã$40)*+9/. docume ts are ivi  fraudule t i formatio o the truth of
--$%"*4416,; *+9/2 ow ership
$     
  #  %        
              !  
!      
  # 
          Ã  $  ~! 
   
        
   
        ±
1 #   #  $ 
 ³There are many forms of ownership title including ±
    $   #  #  
   ! 
  

   
   # 
   Common Law or Old System Title
    $ ! @  
        
  Torrens Title
  
  
   
   Company Title
³Under the Torrens' system it is registration of a dealing which  Strata Title
operates to extinguish inconsistent equitable titles. The system  Community Title
provides the machinery of caveats in order to enable the owner  Perpetual Lease or 99 year Lease
of an equitable interest to forbid registration and thus preserve
The most common type of ownership is µTorrens Title¶. This
his equity.´
usually applies to a standard residential suburban house
 "' ! "'~O""B'
'"% )*+46. Ã$ 3, with its own yard. Some townhouse or courtyard blocks also
1*+462*/+$%"4*+19/
! *+462 have Torrens Title. As long as repayments on mortgages are

         
     
 ) B kept up to date and there are no government or council plans
&       
      
 to resume the land, Torrens Title offers the most
)&  
1
-    
  @
 permanency. As a Torrens Title owner you are responsible
³«.it seems to me that it is not for the Registrar-General to for the cost of all rates, services, maintenance and
decide whether an entry should be cancelled because it was not improvements to the property. Subject to regulations, you
authorized by s. 88(3) and then to act upon his own decision, can alter the building or property. You might also have to
««´ meet the terms of any building µcovenants¶ you have signed.
These are agreement with developers that have terms and
³It follows, I think, that the Registrar-General whose duty it is conditions about alterations.´
to put no unauthorized entries in the register book is under a
corresponding duty to remove any that ought not to be there.´ The details of this whole docume t are ot just i error, they
are fraudule t a d crimi al This docume t, desi ed to ive
³«««the Registrar-General had, in effect, refused - and details of home ow ership, ca o ly lead us to assume that
refused improperly - to issue to the applicant a certificate of over me t have a deliberate pla to remove true la d
title under the Act.´ ow ership throuh deceptio a d misi formatio  As well,
 Ã%%%;O&%O!Ã'('
@~ "O&%O this docume t places over me t i false ow ership of our
)6//-.Ã$3+1*  6//-2 la d via such stateme ts as ³you are respo sible for«all
$      
    #   
   :     rates«´
  
 B     
 A docume t from eChoice Home Loa s, states ³Old system

 ½   $        titles can be converted to Torrens title.´
  
       
  B     

   
   $
 

     ½ formatio from QLD is that several years ao, la dow ers
      
       
 were e couraed to tur i their ³old titles´ a d were the

       
  
  ive a Torre s title reistratio  Torre s is ow compulsory
³The respondent now has no registered easement of way over i QLD
the appellant's land. None is recorded as an exception, Domai Fi a cial Services states ± ³Torrens Title is the most
encumbrance or interest on the title to the appellant's land. Can common form of property title in Australia. All previous and
the respondent compel the appellant to grant it such an current owners are listed on the one deed, as are all previous
easement and compel the appellant to construct a track along mortgagees etc. Also know as "RPA" standing for "Real
that easement?´ Property Act", the legislation that governs the operation of
³"Notwithstanding the existence in any other person of any Torrens Title.´
estate or interest which but for this Act might be held to be A d there are ma y properties for sale listed as Torre s Title
paramount or to have priority,   
    r for the properties
time being of any estate or interest in land recorded in a folio of

14
‘‘
; 5 ~   ;   8   ;   9 

O  G% stated that i a reply to a letter from Mr. Whitlam reiterated his contention to use section 96 of the
a co stitue t, published i the Toowoomba Chro icle Constitution as a means of "competing" with private enterprise.
Auust 11, ³Finally, in relation to Mr Patch's third enquiry In effect this is the selective use of the government's power in the
(TC 25/07),    
    credit field to put free enterprise at a disadvantage to
9
      
            government "enterprise".
O
 O 

  in 1861 or the leasehold lands Mr. Hawke told his Fabian colleagues in Melbourne "For our
which are governed by the Lands Act 1994. The "Brigalow reforms to endure, the whole mood and mind and attitudes of the
Corporation" simply administers land pursuant to this Act. nation must be permanently changed". This is a appeal for a
This system functions effectively to protect the interest of proramme of atio al social e i eeri 
private landholders in Queensland.´
He also said in that speech, "The Fabian Society acknowledges
Commo Law la d rihts bei  a Gra t i Fee Simple the principal tenet of Marxism, the abolition of private property,
---------§-------- in this case to own land. They then align themselves with the non-
     violent arm of Marxism by accepting the non-violent road of
patient gradualism to total government."
½ 1973, Gouh Whitlam authorized a Commissio i to
La d Te ures, headed by Sir Joh Kerr  ;    !   !
!      
This docume t of over 900 paes stated that the private
la d ow er should ot be allowed to be efit fi a cially  Cou cil zo i 
from over me t activities such as re-zo i  To preve t  Developme t applicatio s
this, the ow er should have his ow ership rihts reulated  ½rriators Water Buy-Backs
away, so that a y zo i  be efit would be offset by the loss  La d Cleari  Laws
of la d use rihts The suestio was made to buy all la d  Native A imal Wildlife corridors
back i to Crow ha ds, but the authors reco ized the cost  State Parks
factor would be too imme se  Forest pla ti s
This docume t did ot, at a y stae, reco ize the rihts  Carbo emissio taxes (proposed)
i here t i a Gra t of Fee Simple  E viro me tal laws
The overall decisio of this docume t was to completely  La d care ra ts
reulate all aspects of la d use, resume la d where possible  Native Veetatio laws
a d allow major a d chose developers to develop specific  Global Warmi  propaa da
areas The i dividual could build a house o that la d, with  A d etc
the riht to sell it, but would ever be allowed to ow the While we may perso ally favour some of these measures, it is o
la d lo er a myth that they have all combi ed to remove our
commo law la d ow ership rihts at a massive pace 100¶s of
Gouh Whitlam is widely reco ized as the µleader¶ of the hours of perso al research have led me to believe a d state that
Fabia Society i Australia all these reulatio s were ot i te ded for the betterme t of
This Society favours radual i creme tal cha e rather either the Australia Co ti e t or the people who make it home
tha revolutio ary cha e, tactics of harassme t a d
Their o e over-reachi  aim was to take the la d out of private
attritio rather tha head-o battles They pla to create
ow ership, lock it up, place the citize s i structured, reulated
socialist states i Australia by promoti  Marxist a d housi  a d create a form of commu ist co trol that is almost
Darwi ist doctri es ‘‘Fabia s favour the atio alizatio of complete
la d O  !CA    
#H We are ow seei  Whitlam¶s pla i actio  Farms bei  closed
dow for lack of water that they still pay for People¶s homes
The Fabia Coat of Arms was orii ally a  % 

resumed a d tur ed i to park la d, which is the leased to major
~Ã''@~$% OÃ
#
corporatio s to be tur ed i to resorts La d resumed at basic
ÃAF"   A    costs, for public purposes, the sold to become housi  estates

$  $Ã 
Ma y believe the courts are corrupt, the lawyers are corrupt, the judes are corrupt A d some may well be But your rihts are
still i place, just well hidde  To fi d them, you must e ter the riht court Commo Law carries the law of the Soverei people
Civil law courts are the maistrate courts, La d a d E viro me t Courts, Mi i  Warde ¶s Courts, Family Law courts a d the
like All boards, commissio s, pa els, etc operate esse tially u der Civil law Civil law is the law of corporatio s 
Ã< !Ã " F'I   $ F #$#+3://4)*++3.Ã$*/01*++32*,9$%"6-3
$   %1$ 2169 *++32
½ 
 
1
-  $  #  8
#  #   +   # 
 0
 
    #     +        
   -
  ½½½   
 -      $        +  
 +  
 # 
Judes Dea e, Dawso , Gaudro a d JJ McHuh state«‘
³«.it is not essential to the exercise of judicial power that the tribunal should be called upon to execute its own decision«.it is
apparent that the Commission¶s functions point in many respects to the exercise of judicial power. It decides controversies
between parties and does so by the determination of rights and duties based upon existing facts and the law.´
³ Thus Kitto J in Reg. v. Gallagher; Ex parte Aberdare Collieries (69 (1963) 37 ALJR 40 at 43) said that judicial power con sists
of the "giving of decisions in the nature of adjudications upon disputes as to rights or obligations arising from the operation of the
law upon past events or conduct".

15
‘‘
Commo Law courts are Chapter ½½½ Co stitutio al Courts properly formed u der the Judiciary Act The o ly courts i which you
will fi d your commo law rihts are the Commo Law divisio of the Supreme Court a d the Hih Court
The curre t propaa da i volves ma y ewspaper articles about whether the Hih Court is worth keepi  A d Mr Hatzeeros of
the NSW State Parliame t rece tly dema ded that the Hih Court justices keep their ha ds off laws! Maybe the real issue for both
State & Federal Gover me t is that, like the Quee , it is ot the power the Hih Court has, but the power it de ies to others

  
We have two forms of over me t i Australia, the true de jure Co stitutio al Parliame t which still has its structure i place, but
is o -existe t at prese t A d the pho y, fictio al, prete d de facto over me t that has take over
The Australia Co stitutio has bee replaced with the Australia Act Her Majesty Quee Elizabeth ½½, Her Heirs a d Successo rs
have bee replaced with the Quee of Australia The people¶s riht of Ma date has bee stole a d is used to validate every ew
act of suppressio  The de jure over me t¶s role of ³peace, order a d ood over me t´ has bee replaced with de facto
versio of ³us first, you last´ This de facto over me t uses the riht words to commit the wro  acts aai st the people
QLD calls itself a soverei state, which is a act of war aai st the people of the Commo wealth, because the ³Made´, bei 
corporatio s, parliame ts, etc are thereby placi  themselves ABOVE their ³Creators´ A d if, as has bee stated, Australia is
ow a forei cou try to the Quee , the Her heirs a d successors are the people of the Commo wealth ± us We are therefore
the Soverei s WA has removed the Crow from its de facto over me t, a d made mi i  the od
Over 62 public serva ts are attai ted a d i dicted for Treaso  No-o e accused of treaso ca hold public office, or sta d for
public office, yet all 62 are either still i office or participated i the Federal a d NSW State electio s
O %   O ± the offence of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes
allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power. Also compassing or imagining the death of the king or
queen; giving the king¶s enemies in his realm aid and comfort.
All public serva ts commit treaso whe they swear the oath or affirmatio of the Co stitutio , the state they support a Republic
All public serva ts commit treaso whe they follow the ethics of such subversive commu istic roups as the Fabia Society
All public serva ts commit treaso whe they pla to remove the Ki  of Heave from His rihtful place of authority over a
Christia cou try a d over our cove a ted la d ow ership rihts
All public serva ts commit treaso whe they pla a act of war aai st the people of the Commo wealth, by plotti  to
ma ipulate the mi ds of the people i order to bri  about the serva ts stated i te tio of a ew co stitutio a d republic
½t is time we, the people of Australia stood up aai st these fictio al over me ts a d dema ded the retur of our cou try to the
Commo Law a d the 9th July 1900 Co stitutio of the people of the Commo wealth that our diers fouht to protect
Before Australia had bee discovered it was a u shaped area o the explorers¶ maps, k ow as Terra Australis del Espiritu
Sanctus ± Great South Land of the Holy Spirit. God has always had His Ha d o Australia What He ave to us, o ly He ca take
away
--------------§------------
With ma y rateful tha ks to the ma y soverei people who have shared i formatio which has bee used i this docume t ½
claim othi  more tha the compilatio ± Sue May es Without Prejudice UCC1-207

16
‘‘

You might also like