an administrative agency conducting an investigativeproceeding, the consequences

of which are essentially criminalsince such technical assessment sets off or commences
thep r o c e d u r e f o r & u l t i m a t e l y t h e d e p r i v a t i o n o f l i b e r t y o f a prospective
extradite. In essence, therefore, the evaluationprocess partakes of the nature of a criminal
investigation. Thereare certain constitutional rights that are ordinarily available onlyin criminal
prosecution. an administrative agency conducting an investigativeproceeding,
the consequences of which are essentially criminalsince such technical assessment sets
off or commences thep r o c e d u r e f o r & u l t i m a t e l y
t h e d e p r i v a t i o n o f l i b e r t y o f a prospective
extradite. In essence, therefore, the evaluationprocess partakes of the nature of a criminal
investigation. Thereare certain constitutional rights that are ordinarily available onlyin criminal
prosecution. But the Court has ruled in other casesthat where the
investigation of an administrative
proceedingm a y r e s u l t i n f o r f e i t u r e o f l i f e , l i b e r t y , o r p r o p e r t y , t h e administrative
proceedings are deemed criminal or penal, & suchforfeiture partakes the nature of a penalty.
In the case at bar,similar to a preliminary investigation, the evaluation stage of theextradition
proceedings which may result in the filing of aninformation against the resp
an administrative agency conducting an investigativeproceeding, the consequences
of which are essentially criminalsince such technical assessment sets off or commences
thep r o c e d u r e f o r & u l t i m a t e l y t h e d e p r i v a t i o n o f l i b e r t y o f a prospective
extradite. In essence, therefore, the evaluationprocess partakes of the nature of a criminal
investigation. Thereare certain constitutional rights that are ordinarily available onlyin criminal
prosecution. But the Court has ruled in other casesthat where the
investigation of an administrative
proceedingm a y r e s u l t i n f o r f e i t u r e o f l i f e , l i b e r t y , o r p r o p e r t y , t h e administrative
proceedings are deemed criminal or penal, & suchforfeiture partakes the nature of a penalty.
In the case at bar,similar to a preliminary investigation, the evaluation stage of theextradition
proceedings which may result in the filing of aninformation against the resp
In the case at bar,similar to a preliminary investigation, the evaluation stage of theextradition
proceedings which may result in the filing of aninformation against the resp

an administrative agency conducting an investigativeproceeding, the consequences

of which are essentially criminalsince such technical assessment sets off or commences
thep r o c e d u r e f o r & u l t i m a t e l y t h e d e p r i v a t i o n o f l i b e r t y o f a prospective
extradite. In essence, therefore, the evaluationprocess partakes of the nature of a criminal
investigation. Thereare certain constitutional rights that are ordinarily available onlyin criminal
prosecution. an administrative agency conducting an investigativeproceeding,
the consequences of which are essentially criminalsince such technical assessment sets
off or commences thep r o c e d u r e f o r & u l t i m a t e l y
t h e d e p r i v a t i o n o f l i b e r t y o f a prospective
extradite. In essence, therefore, the evaluationprocess partakes of the nature of a criminal
investigation. Thereare certain constitutional rights that are ordinarily available onlyin criminal
prosecution. But the Court has ruled in other casesthat where the
investigation of an administrative
proceedingm a y r e s u l t i n f o r f e i t u r e o f l i f e , l i b e r t y , o r p r o p e r t y , t h e administrative
proceedings are deemed criminal or penal, & suchforfeiture partakes the nature of a penalty.
In the case at bar,similar to a preliminary investigation, the evaluation stage of theextradition
proceedings which may result in the filing of aninformation against the resp

an administrative agency conducting an investigativeproceeding, the consequences

of which are essentially criminalsince such technical assessment sets off or commences
thep r o c e d u r e f o r & u l t i m a t e l y t h e d e p r i v a t i o n o f l i b e r t y o f a prospective
extradite. In essence, therefore, the evaluationprocess partakes of the nature of a criminal
investigation. Thereare certain constitutional rights that are ordinarily available onlyin criminal
prosecution. But the Court has ruled in other casesthat where the
investigation of an administrative
proceedingm a y r e s u l t i n f o r f e i t u r e o f l i f e , l i b e r t y , o r p r o p e r t y , t h e administrative
proceedings are deemed criminal or penal, & suchforfeiture partakes the nature of a penalty.
In the case at bar,similar to a preliminary investigation, the evaluation stage of theextradition
proceedings which may result in the filing of aninformation against the resp
In the case at bar,similar to a preliminary investigation, the evaluation stage of theextradition
proceedings which may result in the filing of aninformation against the resp