Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhydene
Abstract
Hydrogen with low spark-energy requirement, wide ammability range and high burning velocity is an important candidate for being used as
fuel in spark-ignition engines. It also offers CO2 and HC free combustion and lean operation resulting in lower NOx emissions. However, well
examined external mixing of hydrogen with intake air causes backre and knock especially at higher engine loads. In addition, low heating
value per unit of volume of hydrogen limits the maximum output power. In this study, attention was paid to full usage of hydrogen advantage
employing internal mixing method. Hydrogen was directly injected into cylinder of a single-cylinder test engine using a high-pressure gas
injector and effects of injection timing and spark timing on engine performance and NOx emission were investigated under wide engine loads.
The results indicate that direct injection of hydrogen prevents backre, and that high thermal efciency and output power can be achieved
by hydrogen injection during late compression stroke. Moreover, by further optimization of the injection timing for each engine load, NOx
emission can be reduced under the high engine output conditions.
2006 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Internal combustion engine; Direct-injection SI hydrogen engine; Combustion process; Performance; NOx emission
1. Introduction
Hydrogen has been regarded as a future secondary fuel for
power systems due to CO2 and HC free operation. Recent drastic increase in the price of petroleum, rapid increase in emission
of green house gases and very strict environmental legislations
are major motivating factors for usage of hydrogen in fuel cells
and internal combustion engines. Nevertheless, energy policy
experts generally believe that utilization of hydrogen as a fuel
for transportation sectors more likely can be expected in internal combustion engines than in fuel cells at least for some
decades [1,2]. Although, there are still several barriers for utilization of hydrogen as fuel in transportation sectors, results of
recent works on hydrogen production, distribution and storage
are promising [3].
Hydrogen fuel exhibits desirable characteristics for the combustion in SI engines. Wide range of ammability limits enables
Corresponding author.
0360-3199/$ - see front matter 2006 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.005
297
Nomenclature
(dp/d)max
(dq/d)max
NOx
p
pe
pmax
pi
e
i
j
Table 1
Engine specications
Engine type
Bore Stroke
Displacement
Compression ratio
Combustion chamber
Swirl ratio
Intake valve open
close
Exh valve open
close
Injector nozzle
298
Surge tank
P
flow meter
Pressure
regulator
Laminar
flow meter
Intake air
H2
Injector
Exhaust gas
Spark plug
Nox meter
Amp.
Pressure
pickup
Injection
controller
Data
recorder
Coil
Ignition
controler
Dynamo
meter
Crankangle
pulser
Fig. 2. Experimental setup.
to the combustion chamber wall. NOx (NO + NO2 ) emission was measured using a chemiluminescence NOx analyzer
(Yanaco KA-200). All experiments were conducted at wideopen throttle condition, at a xed cooling-water temperature of
80 C, and at a xed engine speed of 1200 rpm. In present study,
beside knocking and unstable combustion, two other limiting
criteria were considered for the engine operation. Engine operation was carried out for exhaust gas temperature and maximum
in-cylinder pressure lower than 600 C and 7 MPa, respectively.
In-cylinder pressure higher than 7 MPa would damage the gas
injector, when the injection pressure is set at 8 MPa.
3. Results and discussions
In the experiment, effects of fuelair mixing on engine performance and emission were investigated varying the injection
timing in a very wide range. At rst, hydrogen was injected
at early stage of the intake stroke to achieve sufcient mixture preparation period. Then, injection timing was delayed
toward the compression stroke and improvement in engine
performance was demonstrated. In the next step, injection was
further delayed and optimized injection timing for each engine
load was claried.
in one stroke is approximately 11.2 mg (0.125NL) with approximately 60 CA injection duration. As shown, maximum brake
thermal efciency e is achieved at = 0.5 and is about 35%.
Spark timing i for maximum brake mean effective pressure
pe (MBT) delays with increasing the equivalence ratio . For
= 0.6 and 0.7, advancing i toward MBT was difcult due
to strong knocking. Therefore, e was diminished when compared with that for = 0.5. Brake mean effective pressure pe
increases with increasing the equivalence ratio. However, this
tendency decays under the high equivalence ratio conditions
and therefore maximum mean effective pressure pe achieved in
this experiment was about 0.65 MPa, which is lower than that
achieved from the original diesel engine. As shown later in this
paper, in this injection timing, increasing amount of hydrogen
injected lowers the amount of the intake air and therefore volumetric efciency decreases. In particular, for hydrogen with
low heating value per unit volume, maximum power is greatly
limited by reduction in the intake air amount. Regarding combustion characteristics, maximum in-cylinder pressure pmax decreases when spark i is retarded, and is lower than 6 MPa in
all conditions. Maximum pressure increase rate (dp/d)max increases by increasing the equivalence ratio , resulting in an
increase in NOx emissions, typically at > 0.5. For = 0.7,
maximum NOx emission was about 8000 ppm.
ppm
=0.3
0.4
4000
=0.23
6000
0.3
4000
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.4
MPa/deg
2000
2000
0.6
0.4
6
4
0.8
0.7
= 0.5
0.6
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.4
pe
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.40
0.40
0.2
0.35
0.30
0.35
pe
=0.6
MPa
1.0
pmax
MPa
2
pmax
0.0
MPa
0.0
0.2
(dp/d)max
MPa
0.2
MPa/deg
6000
NOx
j=130BTDC
8000
(dp/d)max
8000
NOx
ppm
j = 300 BTDC
299
0.25
0.30
0.25
0.20
-40
-20
i
20
0.20
60
BTDC
40
20
i
-20
BTDC
1.0
j=130BTDC
Volumetric efficiency
-60
0.9
0.8
j=300BTDC
WOT
0.7
i=MBT
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
=0.5
6000
1000
0.4
MPa
0.6
pmax
2000
MPa/deg
NOx
4000
0.2
8
0.0
4
3
j=130BTDC
100
90
0.6
(dp/d)max
MPa
2000
0.4
0.2
4
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.375
MPa
pmax
0.40
0.2
0.35
j=80BTDC
70
0.325
20
10
i
0.30
-10
BTDC
0.25
0.20
60
0.350
pe
0.6
0.4
MPa/deg
ppm
3000
NOx
j=100BTDC
8000
ppm
(dp/d)max
300
40
20
i
-20
BTDC
compared to that for j = 300 BTDC. This means that degree of mixing is not much affected with retard in the injection
timing.
Finally, injection timing was further retarded to j =
100 BTDC and the results are shown in Fig. 6. Compared
with results of j = 130 BTDC, pe and e have further increased. In this case, spark timing of MBT is not so retarded.
Maximum in-cylinder pressure pmax changes little with that
of j = 130 BTDC at the same i , whereas (dp/d)max is remarkably increased. Retarding the injection timing lowers NOx
concentration typically for the higher equivalence ratios. This
indicates that NOx formation depends on the heterogeneity in
the fuelair mixture. Study carried out by one of the authors
shows that for < 0.7, combustion of heterogeneous mixture
gives higher NOx emission, however, for > 0.7 NOx emission of homogeneous mixtures combustion is much higher
than that for heterogeneous mixture [21].
MPa
=0.5
j=300BTDC
6
4
kJ/kg.deg
dq/d
i=12BTDC (MBT)
16
6
-4
i=11BTDC (MBT)
0
150
2
-3
0
150
i=12BTDC (MBT)
i=11BTDC (MBT)
16
7
100
50
-4
50
19
0
-60 -45 -30 -15
100
-3
14
8
MPa
j=130BTDC
19
14
301
15
30
45
60
j=100BTDC
18
6
-4
15
30
45
60
j=80BTDC
15
i=8BTDC (MBT)
-7
dq/d
kJ/kg.deg
i=11BTDC (MBT)
0
150
150
0
i=11BTDC (MBT)
18
100
-4
100
50
i=8BTDC (MBT)
15
-7
50
0
-60 -45 -30 -15
15
30
45
ATDC
60
15
30
45
60
ATDC
Fig. 8. Changes of in-cylinder pressure p, heat release rate dq/d with ignition timing i for different injection timing j at = 0.5.
6000
j=300BTDC
130
100
80
70
2000
NOx
4000
8000
MBT
6000
4000
2000
BTDC
20
15
20
0
30
10
pi
10
0.6
40
30
20
10
0
-10
0.0
0.375
(dp/d)max
0.2
0.400
0.375
e
0.350
0.325
BTDC
0.6
0.8
MPa/deg
=0.5
0.4
ppm
MBT
NOx
8000
=0.3
0.4
ppm
302
0.350
0.325
0.300
130
120
110
100
BTDC
90
80
70
0.300
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Fig. 10. Brake thermal efciency e , MBT ignition timing, pi and NOx
emissions against equivalence ratio for different injection timings j .
303
Fig. 11. Changes of in-cylinder pressure p, heat release rate dq/d with equivalence ratio for different injection timing j at MBT ignition timing.
6000
MBT
ppm
8000
2000
0
8
MPa
NOx
4000
2
0
j=300BTDC
300
130
100
80
70
200
kJ/kgdeg
pmax
0.375
(dq/d)max
100
0.350
0.325
0.300
0.2
0.4
0.6
pe
0.8
1.0
MPa
indeed important to achieve an engine performance level competitive to that in the modern direct-injection diesel engines.
Acknowledgment
This study was partially supported by a Grant-in-aid for
the 21st Century COE Program Establishment of COE on
Sustainable-Energy System from Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and by Industrial
Technology Research Grant Program in 2003 from New Energy
and Industrial Development Organization NEDO of Japan.
References
[1] Romm J. The car and fuel of the future. Energy Policy, in press.
[2] Lavrive JF, Mahieu V, Griesemann JC, Rickeard DJ. Well-to-wheels
analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European
context. SAE Paper 2004;2004-01-1924; 2004.
[3] Mizuno M, Ogami N, Negishi Y, Katahira N. High pressure
hydrogen tank for FCHV. JSAE proceeding, 2005;84-05;20055157:136
[in Japanese].
[4] Varde KS, Lucas GG. Hydrogen as a fuel for vehicle propulsion. PIME
1974;26:36572.
[5] Saga K, Furuhama S. Performance and emission control in stratied
charge hydrogen fueled engines. IMechE 1976; 2936.
[6] Wallace JS, Ward CA. Hydrogen as a fuel. Int J Hydrogen Energy
1983;8(4):25568.
[7] Knecht W, Hakimifard D, Carletta, M. A hydrogen engine for heavy-duty
vehicles. SAE Paper 1984; No. 845138, Trans, vol. 93, 1984. p. 20511.
[8] Welch AB, Wallace JS. Performance characteristics of a hydrogen-fueled
diesel engine with ignition assist, SAE Paper 1990; No. 902070; 1990.
304