18 - (2013) Heras-Saizarbitoria & Boiral - IsO 9001 and ISO 14001

bs_bs_banner
International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 15, 4765 (2013)

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00334.x
ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a

Research Agenda on Management
System Standards*
ijmr_334
47..65
Iaki Heras-Saizarbitoria and Olivier Boiral1

Department of Management, E.U.E. Empresariales, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Plaza Oati 1,
20018, San Sebastian, Spain, and 1Dpartement de management, Facult des sciences de ladministration, Universit
Laval, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1638, Qubec, Qubec G1V 0A6, Canada
Corresponding author email: iheras@ehu.es
Management system standards, also called meta-standards, have been adopted by an
increasing number of organizations across the world. Although these management
system standards are based on the same type of management principles and institutional
arrangements, the literature remains scattered, with diverse studies focused on specific
standards and published in various journals. The main objective of this paper is to
analyse the academic research on meta-standards through an integrative review
intended to shed light on the main conclusions and substantial advances made in this
area. This integrative review focuses more specifically on the two main meta-standards
which have been adopted by more than 1.3 million organizations worldwide: ISO 14001
and ISO 9001.The paper contributes insights into the main streams of the literature and
current knowledge gaps to be addressed in future research on the various issues related
to meta-standards: global governance, diffusion processes, motivations, benefits of
adoption and impacts on performance, internalization, integration, consultancy and
auditing.
Introduction
The development of management standards now
encompasses a very wide range of aspects of business activity, such as quality management (e.g. ISO
9001), environmental management (e.g. ISO 14001),
the prevention of occupational hazards and the provision of health and safety regulations in the workplace (e.g. OHSAS 18000), and corporate social
*This article is a result of a Research Project funded by the
Basque Autonomous Government (GIC 10/89) and the
Spanish Ministry for Education and Science (ECO200912754). The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to
the Co-Editor-in-Chief of IJMR Oswald Jones and to the
three reviewers for their assistance; their constructive criticism and suggestions helped us to improve and develop the
paper substantively.
responsibility (e.g. SA 8000). These standards tend

to use quite similar methodology with regard to
their creation, structure, implementation process and
monitoring by a third party, a trend that was established by the successful ISO 9001 and ISO 14001
standards. Indeed, it should be taken into account
that, by late 2010, over 1,100,000 ISO 9001 certificates and 250,000 ISO 14001 certificates had been
authorized in a total of 178 countries all over the
world (ISO 2011; see Figure 1).
Similarly, standards-based management is a
research field that has received a lot of attention in
recent years, owing to the great success enjoyed by
management standards all over the world. In our
opinion, therefore, it is important to review the different approaches to the study of standardization in a
management context, so as to attempt to synthesize
2012 The Authors

International Journal of Management Reviews 2012 British Academy of Management and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA
02148, USA
48
I. Heras-Saizarbitoria and O. Boiral
Figure 1. Worldwide ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certification. Source: ISO Survey (ISO 2011)
and thus improve academic knowledge, which is

in the interests of the various different stakeholders
involved (i.e. managers, consultants, policy-makers
and researchers).
This work represents an attempt to analyse in depth
the class of standards known as management system
standards (MSS), also referred to as meta-standards
(Uzumeri 1997), and which have been so successful
in recent years. In this paper, a review of the substantial advances made in the field of this subject of study
is carried out; the review comes within the category
of integrative reviews, works that seek to merge
findings from related areas (Macpherson and Jones
2010, p. 109). Moreover, a research agenda for the
field is proposed. The paper focuses on the two main
global management standards at the international
level: ISO 14001 and ISO 9001.
A systematic literature review was carried out
in order to identify the most prominent theoretical
and empirical academic works on the topic. In short,
the ABI/Inform, Emerald and Science Direct databases were used to perform literature searches with
the following keywords: (1) ISO 9000, ISO 9001,
ISO 14001, ISO 14000; (2) ISO standards; (3) metastandard; and (4) management system standard/s.
The main contribution of this paper is to provide
an integrative review of the multifaceted literature on
meta-standards, to analyse the main conclusions of
studies carried out from different perspectives and to
propose various avenues for future research based

on the knowledge gaps identified. The remainder of
the paper is organized as follows. Following this
introduction, the paper presents a short overview
of standardization and MSS or meta-standards. In
the third section, ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 are briefly
analysed, followed by a fourth section in which an
attempt is made to synthesize the main theoretical
perspectives or approaches applied to the analysis of
those meta-standards in academic studies. The fifth
section constitutes an outline map of the main areas
of research undertaken to date and the areas in which,
in the authors opinion, research should be undertaken in the future. The paper ends with a summary
of the main conclusions.
Standardization and meta-standards

Standardization constitutes a mechanism of coordination and an instrument of regulation comparable
with other instruments, such as public regulations,
markets and hierarchies or formal organizations
(Antonelli 1998; Brunsson and Jacobsson 2000). In
a global economy, without standardization and its
results technical standards or specifications interchanges would become exceedingly difficult. Standardization can, then, stimulate international trade by
eliminating obstacles arising from different national
2012 The Authors

Research Agenda on Management System Standards

practices. Thus, standards are important for the
promotion of economic efficiency, as they provide a
basis for reducing information-related transaction
costs (Nadvi and Wltring 2004).
Focusing on the specific case of management
standards, in their monograph on standardization
Brunsson and Jacobsson (2000) refer repeatedly
to standards for administrative processes, and
Furusten (2000, p. 71), in the same monograph,
defines management standards as standards on
how to design and manage organizations. We can
explicitly identify these administrative standards
with what we would define here as MSS, a term
that already has a certain tradition of academic
acceptance behind it in studies relating to quality
management and environmental management (e.g.
Corbett and Kirsch 2001; Delmas 2002; Karapetrovic 2002; Neumayer and Perkins 2004; Wilkinson
and Dale 2001).
In the literature on the subject, MSS are often
called meta-standards (e.g. Boiral 2001; Braun 2005;
Christmann and Taylor 2006; Corbett and Yeung
2008; Karapetrovic and Willborn 1998; Wilkinson
and Dale 1999). Uzumeri (1997) refers to them as
lists of design rules to guide the creation of entire
classes of management systems. Since systems theorists use the term metasystem for lists of this type, it
follows that this type of management standard should
be referred to as a meta-standard (Uzumeri 1997,
p. 22). Corbett and Yeung (2008) use the term metastandard loosely to refer to standards that apply to
broad processes (rather than individual products) and
to entire families of such process standards (Corbett
and Yeung 2008, p. 1).
These management standards are, of course, to be
distinguished from the technical norms and specifications relating to those requirements with which
particular products or processes need to comply.
Even so, such a broad definition of standardization
in the field of management could encompass, for
example, international norms and guidelines dealing with accountancy and audits (the International
Standards on Auditing, for instance) or such general
management models as that of the EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management). These
guidelines and models are based on a set of guidelines and benchmarks developed by specific organizations and referring to a particular field of
management. Although the focus and content of
MSS may be quite different, their principles, structure, terminology and certification processes share
common characteristics.
49
ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: the first

global meta-standards
The ISO 9001 standard does not refer to compliance
with an objective or with a particular result. That
is, it is not a performance standard measuring the
quality of companies products or services. Rather,
ISO 9001 proposes guidelines to systematize and
formalize a series of company processes into a series
of procedures, and to document this implementation.
ISO 9001 standardizes procedures, duties and roles,
rather than goals or outcomes (Braun 2005; Guler
et al. 2002).
Compliance with ISO 9001, which can be certified
by an institution accredited for this purpose, requires
documentation to show the implementation of a
quality management system, including standardized
and documented procedures on the basic processes
used to produce the product or service which
the customer acquires. ISO 9001 standard is thus a
management tool based on the systematization and
formalization of tasks in order to achieve product
homogeneity and to conform to the specifications
established by the customer (Anderson et al. 1999).
Similarly, ISO 14001 does not fix environmental goals or environmental targets to be achieved
(requirements for the prevention and reduction of
the impact of pollution, for instance), as a result of
the possible attainment of which a certificate would
be obtained. Rather, this standard establishes requirements defining the operational systems to be complied with within companies in relation to activities
which have an environmental impact (Delmas 2001;
King and Lenox 2001). It is a model which provides
a systematic framework within which to incorporate
environmental concerns into a companys day-to-day
operations.
From a global perspective, the successful diffusion
of these MSS or meta-standards would appear to be
closely linked to the basic impetus of the process
of globalization of the Western economies, to the
extending global supply chains and the still growing
importance of transnational corporations (Braun
2005). In the current economic environment, in
which outsourcing and relocation of companies
activities have become key strategic elements of
global supply chains, it is necessary to foster a
certain homogeneity of management systems in
order to favour the development of such processes,
and MSS may help to achieve this aim. As Boiral
(2001, p. 80) states: the development of management standards is part of the growing globalization
2012 The Authors

50
of the world economy, which requires the adoption of

international standards that facilitate exchanges and
communication between countries.
Approaches to the academic study

of meta-standards
governance and regulation2 (e.g. Haufler 1999), those

carried out from the standpoint of economic geography (e.g. Neumayer and Perkins 2004, 2005) and
more eclectic works which are difficult to classify
(e.g. Naveh and Marcus 2004; Rondinelli and Vastag
2000).
Technical approaches
Introduction
Standardization of management systems and its endproduct, meta-standards, constitute a clear example
of a multidimensional phenomenon which has implications of an extremely varied nature. It is for this
reason that they have been studied from the perspective of a variety of disparate but related disciplines,
such as international economics, management studies (and, more specifically, the study of operations
management) and organizational sociology.
In this section of the paper, an attempt will be made
to produce a synthesis of these approaches.1 First, the
different theoretical approaches will be structured in
three main groups: (1) technical approaches, in which
we would place the standpoint of Operation Management and other technical standpoints involving a
study of the meta-standards that refer to more or less
general, mature fields such as Quality Management,
Environmental Management and System Thinking,
among others; (2) non-technical approaches, with
the following four sub-approaches: self-regulation,
decentralized institutions and signalling models,
cartels and clubs and New Institutionalism; and (3)
other approaches, in which we have grouped various
pieces of research based on eclectic works and which
are, consequently, difficult to classify.
The following two subsections focus on the
presentation of the first two general approaches.
The main works published in the literature could
be included in them. In the research perspective that
we have generically named other approaches, we
include other works from various different standpoints, such as works of a pragmatic nature carried
out from the standpoint of international economics
and international business, those that focus on the
same standpoint but which are clearly critical (e.g.
Clapp 2001), highlight new challenges regarding
1
At this point we would like to express our gratitude for the

guidance provided by one of the three reviewers of this
paper, as this helped us in the complex structuring work of
the different standpoints referred to in the study that have
analysed meta-standards.
These approaches focus on the practical implications

of meta-standards for organizations (e.g. Anderson
et al. 1999; Benner and Veloso 2008; Casadess and
Karapetrovic 2005; Corbett and Kirsch 2001; Corbett
and Yeung 2008; Martnez-Costa et al. 2008, 2009;
Terziovski et al. 2003). Thus, a great deal of research
has focused on the measurement of meta-standards
impacts in the field of operations management,
quality management, environmental management and
supply chain management (for a recent review of the
works published on ISO 9001 from this perspective,
see Sampaio et al. 2009). This measurement generally
uses quantitative surveys, which have played a dominant role in the literature. Studies on the impacts
of meta-standards have been conducted in various
countries, often using a very similar methodology
(e.g. questionnaire). Certain surveys have also been
conducted from a transnational perspective (e.g.
Corbett and Kirsch 2001). Various studies have analysed the motivations behind adopting meta-standards
(e.g. Bansal and Roth 2000; Martnez-Costa et al.
2008; Sampaio et al. 2009; Yin and Schmeidler
2009). The effect on the performance of organizations has also been widely debated (e.g. Carlsson and
Carlsson 1996; Corbett et al. 2005; Dick et al. 2008;
Huarng et al. 1999; Martnez-Costa et al. 2008;
Terziovski et al. 2003). For example, the benefits of
ISO 9001 implementation have been widely studied.
Thus, the ISO 9001 adoption has been associated
with productivity and effectiveness (Douglas and
Glen 2000; Jang and Lin 2008), quality improvement (Escanciano et al. 2001; Sun 2000), customer
satisfaction (Gonzlez-Torre et al. 2001; MoatazedKeivani et al. 1999) and employee motivation
(Kunnanatt 2007; Santos and Escanciano 2002). The
same type of study has been undertaken with regard to
the benefits of ISO 14001 (Bansal and Hunter 2003;
Delmas 2001; Gonzlez-Benito and Gonzlez-Benito
2005; Yin and Schmeidler 2009).
2
This is a sub-approach with a clear link to that of selfregulation, but which is put together in a different way as it
has far less theoretical basis.
2012 The Authors

51
In short, this first standpoint also includes in

quantitative terms an extremely far-ranging literature, and is also the approach that was developed
first, at a very early stage (in the early 1990s in
the case of ISO 9001). Generally speaking, technical
approaches tend to encourage organizations to adopt
meta-standards by shedding light on their positive
impacts, measured through quantitative studies
carried out in various regions and sectors of activity.
Nevertheless, these studies tend to overlook certain
pitfalls and pervasive effects that can result from the
adoption of meta-standards: paperwork, superficial
implementation and lack of internal motivation
(Boiral 2003, 2007; Christmann and Taylor 2006;
Jiang and Bansal 2003; Walgenbach 2001). Moreover, technical approaches tend to focus on the
standard implications for the organization and to
neglect more global issues that can explain their
international development and institutionalization
throughout various sectors of activity, such as the
use of meta-standards as self-regulation mechanisms, their role as signalling models and their social
legitimacy in the eyes of certain stakeholders.
the inability of some countries to establish a system

of public regulation in relation to particular fields of
activity such as the environment or employees rights,
has intensified companies interest in self-regulation,
a subject which is also of great relevance in the field
of management standards. Despite liberalization, the
global economy continues to be governed by rules,
but the rules are changing, and international standards point to one such set of changes (Nadvi and
Wltring 2004). If it is true, in fact, that in modern
nation-states the main burden of regulatory activity is
assumed by the public administration, which for this
purpose has at its disposal various powers to sanction
or to encourage, the new supranational organizations
which have arisen out of the decline of the nationstate, such as the European Union, the United Nations
or the OECD, do not benefit from the same hierarchical authority and power to sanction, which has led
to the emergence of new regulatory institutions
that do not belong to the traditional sphere of public
regulation. For Mendel (2001), standardization thus
represents a form of coordination and hybrid governance that is on the increase. All in all, from this
perspective, standardization is thus perceived as a
new form of alternative to traditional public regulation. The absence of a regulatory power of a global
public nature the task of designing, implementing
and enforcing standards tends to be assumed by
different regional or global institutions of a nongovernmental nature in areas that have traditionally
belonged to the area of regulation by the authorities
(Abbott and Snidal 2001; Brunsson and Jacobsson
2000; Neumayer and Perkins 2005). Among these
new regulatory institutions, special mention should
be made of the International Organization for
Standardization. This body, known by its acronym
ISO (International Standardization Organization),3
together with the IEC (International Electrotechnical
Commission) and the ITU (International Telecommunication Union), form the main international organizations for standardization. The three bodies have, in
conjunction with the WTO (World Trade Organization), formed a strategic alliance with the common
aim of promoting the creation of a free and equitable
global trading system. This agreement, known as the
Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, provides
for the establishment of a code of conduct for the
Non-technical approaches
These approaches are essentially focused on the
analysis of the development, rationality and social
legitimacy of meta-standards, from a more global
and theoretical perspective. Through the adoption of
meta-standards and their certification, legitimacy is
awarded to the organizations adopting them, and this
grants benefits beyond pure technical or efficiency
advantages (Beck and Walgenbach 2005). This standpoint is most salient in New Institutionalism, although
it can be argued that it is also present in other
approaches and, on occasions, even in works which, in
terms of both the views they express and the journals
in which they are published, could be included among
technical approaches (e.g. Nair and Prajogo 2009).
This does not really come as a shock, above all if one
takes into account that, according to some authors,
third-party certification, like other forms of auditing
certification, is primarily aimed at creating trust and
social legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders (Boiral
and Gendron 2011; Power 2003).
Self-regulation refers to the adoption of voluntary
standards (e.g. environmental standards such as ISO
14001) beyond the requirements of government regulation (Christmann and Taylor 2006; King and Lenox
2000; Prakash and Potoski 2007). As is underlined by
ORourke (2006) and Christmann and Taylor (2001),
The International Organization for Standardization was

reconstituted as the successor organization to the short-lived
International Standards Association, which had already been
established in the 1920s (Braun 2005).
2012 The Authors

52
preparation, adoption and application of standards

based on both the principles of non-discrimination
and harmonization and the stated objective of preventing international standards becoming unnecessary technical barriers to free trade.
In short, what stands out in this standpoint is
the notion of meta-standards as moving towards a
global regulation tool. Within this standpoint, it would
also be interesting to explain, among other things, the
differences from the sub-standpoint associated with
works that analyse the link between meta-standards
and private international business regulation and
soft law (e.g. Abbott and Snidal 2006; Vogel 2008).
This sub-standpoint of soft laws differs from others in
that it focuses on an analysis of the legitimacy and
enforcement mechanism of initiatives such as ISO
14001, compared with hard law (Roht-Arriaza 2000;
Vogel 2008).
Another perspective featuring in management
studies, closely related to that referred to above, is
the analysis of meta-standards from the perspective
of decentralized institutions and signalling models,
based on Michael Spences theory of market signalling (King and Toffel 2009; Terlaak and King 2006).
This perspective concentrates on analysing the role
of meta-standards and their certification and the
elimination of asymmetries in information. For this
perspective, meta-standards can be seen as signals of
supplier characteristics that lower search and monitoring costs in supply chains (Christmann and Taylor
2001; King et al. 2005). More specifically, Terlaak
and King (2006) argue that many studies carried
out from the perspective of the technical approach
that have tried to analyse companies motivation for
adopting meta-standards have failed to explain fully
the nature of certified management standards. These
authors affirm that, from a theoretical perspective,
the aforementioned studies do not explain why
organizations implement and certify such metastandards, given that, since the requirements of the
standards are public and consultancy firms are available to aid the adoption of practices, companies do
not need to certify the systems that they implement in
order to gain an operational benefit (Terlaak and
King 2006). In other words, they underline the idea
that an organization does not need a certificate in
order to make the standard work and that there must
be non-technical reasons that explain the existence of
meta-standards. Therefore, Terlaak and King (2006)
argue that certified management standards constitute
a form of private decentralized institution, because
participation is voluntary and because a wide variety
of stakeholders, rather than a single central authority,

provide rewards for participating or sanctions for not
participating. They emphasize the process of certification itself, which is, in their opinion, the distinguishing element of these decentralized institutions:
certification as a critical determinant of the function
of management standards (Terlaak and King 2006,
p. 1092). The importance given to the notion of
information asymmetry could be identified as a
distinguishing feature of the standpoint, which
stresses that the raison dtre of meta-standards is to
reduce information asymmetries between potential
exchange partners.
Following an approach clearly related to that above,
the phenomenon of meta-standards has also been
studied (especially in relation to ISO 14001) from
the viewpoint of the theory of cartels and clubs which
can be applied to voluntary programmes in which
certifiable meta-standards may also be included
(particularly noteworthy for these purposes are the
contributions from Diaye et al. (2007), Kerret (2008)
and Potoski and Prakash (2004, 2005)). Basing their
observations on the theoretical model proposed by
Buchanan, Potoski and Prakash (2005) point out
that, for companies, the benefits of membership (the
so-called club goods) are the excludable branding
certification that allows members to publicize their
club membership and thus claim credit for their
pro-environment activities. The key conceptual distinction made by the authors is that
clubs excludable benefits are not the rewards
members receive from external audiences for taking
specific environmental action. Rather, excludable
benefits stem from membership in ISO 9001 or
ISO 14001, which provides a credible signal of
a companys overall approach to environmental
governance. (Potoski and Prakash 2005)
The notion of information asymmetries is also

present in this standpoint, although one of the most
obvious distinguishing features that can be established in this case is the importance given to the study
of costs and benefits associated with meta-standard
certification the additional costs and the excludable branding benefits (Prakash and Potoski 2006).
It is also highlighted that international trade buyers
face higher transaction costs in identifying quality
exporters because of spatial, cultural, and linguistic
distances and that, as a result, meta-standards such as
ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 were explicitly designed to
solve the information asymmetry problem in international trade (Potoski and Prakash 2009).
2012 The Authors

53
Meta-standards have also been analysed from the

perspective of New Institutionalism. This approach
to the study of the adoption of meta-standards
takes as its reference point institutional and neoinstitutional theories of the study of organizations
and suggests that firms obtain legitimacy by conforming to the dominant practices within their organizational field. In their seminal work, DiMaggio and
Powell (1991) maintain that there are three types
of external pressure that lead organizations towards
isomorphism or homogeneity: coercive, mimetic
and normative.4 First, coercive isomorphism may
result from the pressure of external stakeholders to
adopt meta-standards. For example, pressure from
customers is one of the main drivers of ISO 9001
certification (Boiral 2003; Buttle 1997; Carlsson and
Carlsson 1996). Second, mimetic isomorphism tends
to occur when meta-standards are viewed by companies as exemplary forms of management practices.
The imitation of organizations adopting these exemplary management practices tends to propagate
certain standards such as ISO 9001 and ISO 14001
across national borders (e.g. Beck and Walgenbach
2005; Boiral 2007; Boiral and Amara 2009; Guler
et al. 2002; Vasconcelos and Vasconcelos 2003).
Third, for several authors, normative isomorphism
occurs when an accreditation institution has the right
to evaluate and inspect other organizations, granting
the use of a seal or label certifying that the authorized
organization follows the processes prescribed by
the authorizer, and certificates such as ISO 9001 and
ISO 14001 fall into this category (Guler et al. 2002;
Mendel 2002; Vasconcelos and Vasconcelos 2003).
Generally speaking, organizations seek support
and legitimacy in their institutional fields by adopting structural models that are perceived to be the
best available. In that way, entities such as ISO are
key players in defining the isomorphic properties of
many institutional fields. One of the most prominent
aspects of this sub-approach is that it focuses on
analysing the cross-national dissemination of metastandards and the institutional pressures that explain
why companies certify. This standpoint emphasizes
the importance of coercive, normative and mimetic
forces and the mechanisms of international dissemination of the ISO 9001 standard (Casper and Hancke
1999; Guler et al. 2002; Mendel 2001). In short, the
distinguishing feature of this sub-approach is that

New Institutionalism explains what meta-standards
are by focusing on the institutional pressures that
encourage their adoption. Nevertheless, according to
critical approaches based on New Institutionalism,
meta-standards can be superficially implemented
when organizations are mostly driven by the quest for
social legitimacy rather than the search for improvements of internal practices (Boiral 2007; Christmann
and Taylor 2006; Walgenbach 2001).
Other followers of this line of theory maintain that these

processes can be divided into coercive, normative and cognitive mechanisms leading to organizational isomorphism
(Braun 2005; Guler et al. 2002; Mendel 2002).
A research agenda on meta-standards

As already pointed out by Uzumeri (1997) more than
a decade ago, meta-standards could lead to fundamental changes in management practice, since they
represent a new management technology that may
have a profound impact on the short-term evolution
of management practice. This author also declared
that scholars, practitioners and policy-makers should
begin the serious task of mapping and analysing their
broader implications (Uzumeri 1997).
It seems clear that the American scholars wish
has only partly come true. Although academic literature on the subject of meta-standards has grown in
recent years, it is surprising that its volume has not
increased even more, especially in view of the observation made by Corbett and Yeung (2008) to the
effect that, Once one considers that literally millions
of organizations worldwide are directly impacted by
such meta-standards, it is surprising that not more
scholarly research exists on most of these standards
(Corbett and Yeung 2008, p. 1). In our opinion,
however, the principal shortfall lies in the badly
structured and insufficiently incremental manner in
which academic research into the phenomenon has
developed.
Table 1 summarizes the principal research areas
that are currently being produced through the
medium of specialized academic literature, in an
attempt to carry out a mapping exercise that may be
of interest to researchers working in this research
field.
Regarding research area 1, the complex process
by which standards are created, along the lines of
the complete work undertaken by Haufler (1999),
carried out from a critical perspective, in relation to
ISO 14001, should be studied further. As Nadvi and
Wltring (2004) point out, global meta-standards formulated by private and public/private initiatives such
as ISO imply new forms of global governance in the
2012 The Authors

54
Table 1. Academic study of meta-standards: an integrative review

Research areas
Representative works
(theoretical approach/es)a
Main research results

(representative works)
1. Creation of
meta-standards
and implications
for global
governance
Haufler (1999) [O]

Clapp (2001) [O]
Summers (2003) [NI]
Nadvi and Wltring (2004) [O]
Giovannucci and Ponte (2005) [NI]
Nadvi (2008) [O]
Ruwet (2011) [O]
Creation of meta-standards is a complex political process (Clapp

2001; Haufler 1999)
Meta-standards imply new forms of global governance in the
world economy (Summers 2003)
Meta-standards are frequently launched without the real
participation of the developing countries (Giovannucci and Ponte
2005; Nadvi and Wltring 2004)
2. International
Terlaak and King 2006 [SR]
diffusion process Corbett and Kirsch (2001) [TA]
of meta-standards Guler et al. (2002) [NI]
Delmas (2002) [NI]
Saraiva and Duarte (2003) [TA]
Poksinska et al. (2003) [C&C]
Franceschini et al. (2004) [TA]
Vastag (2004) [SR]
Neumayer and Perkins (2004 2005) [O]
Corbett (2006) [TA]
Marimn et al. (2006) [TA]
Alburquerque et al. (2007) [TA]
Potoski and Prakash (2009) [DIS]
Delmas and Montes (2008) [NI]
Positive correlation between certificates and macro-economic

variables (Neumayer and Perkins 2004; Potoski and Prakash
2004)
ISO 14001 and ISO 9001 meta-standards had followed similar
diffusion patterns (Corbett 2006; Corbett and Kirsch 2001)
ISO 14001 certification levels by country depend on ISO 9001
certification levels, export propensity, and environmental attitudes
(Corbett and Kirsch 2001)
Bilateral trade and geographical proximity are drivers of ISO
9001, while cultural similarity drives for ISO 14001
(Alburquerque et al. 2007)
The diffusion models for innovations fit well (Alburquerque et al.
2007; Franceschini et al. 2004; Marimn et al. 2006)
3. Motivations to
adopt
meta-standards
Bansal and Roth (2000) [NI,TA]

Gonzlez-Benito and Gonzlez-Benito
(2005) [TA]
Beck and Walgenbach (2005) [NI]
King et al. (2005) [DIS]
Darnall and Edwards (2006) [NI]
Yin and Schmeidler (2009) [TA]
Martnez-Costa et al. (2008) [TA]
Sampaio et al. (2009) [TA]
Nair and Prajogo (2009) [NI,TA]
Prajogo (2011) [NI,TA]
Different typology of motivation: internal vs external

(Gonzlez-Benito and Gonzlez-Benito 2005); functionalist vs
institutional (Nair and Prajogo 2009).
Isomorphic pressures are important drivers (Bansal and Roth
2000; Beck and Walgenbach 2005)
Firms seek certification when their partners lack credible
information (King et al. 2005)
Customer pressure and the external image are the main drivers
(Darnall and Edwards 2006)
4. Benefits of
adoption(A) and
impact on
performance(B)
(A) Carlsson and Carlsson (1996) [TA]

Buttle (1997) [TA]
Brown and Van der Wiele (1995, 1996) [TA]
Huarng et al. (1999) [TA]
Bansal and Bogner (2002) [TA]
Melnyk et al. (2002) [TA]
Terziovski et al. (2003) [NI,TA]
Casadess and Karapetrovic (2005) [TA]
Prajogo (2011) [NI,TA]
Boiral and Amara (2009) [NI,TA]
Boiral (2011) [NI,TA]
Heras-Saizarbitoria et al. (2011a) [NI,TA]
(B)Rondinelli and Vastag (2000)[O]
King and Lenox (2001) [SR]
Russo and Harrison (2001) [NI]
Bansal and Bogner (2002) [O]
Corbett et al. (2005) [NI,TA]
Potoski and Prakash (2005) [C&C]
King et al. (2005) [DIS]
Dick et al. (2008) [TA]
Benner and Veloso (2008) [NI,TA]
Martnez-Costa et al. (2008) [TA]
Heras-Saizarbitoria et al. (2011b) [NI,TA]
Main benefits of ISO 9001: improvement of operational

performance; greater customer satisfaction; improved
relationships within the organization; improvement in the internal
efficiency of the company; improved image for competitors and
stakeholders (Brown and Van der Wiele 1996; Casadess and
Karapetrovic 2005; Terziovski et al. 2003)
Main benefits of ISO 14001: reduction in the consumption of
resources and improved image for competitors and stakeholders
(Bansal and Bogner 2002; Melnyk et al. 2002)
Positive impact of meta-standards in business performance
(Bansal and Bogner 2002; Corbett et al. 2005; Dick et al. 2008;
King et al. 2005; Martnez-Costa et al. 2008; Potoski and Prakash
2005; Russo and Harrison 2001; Heras-Saizarbitoria et al. 2011b)
Significantly positive relationship between the drivers for
adopting the meta-standards and the benefits and/or the business
performance (Boiral 2007, 2011; Prajogo 2011; Terziovski et al.
2003; Heras-Saizarbitoria et al. 2011a)
Paradoxical impacts of ISO 9001 certification and different
performance configurations based on criteria related to
effectiveness and internal problems Boiral and Amara (2009)
2012 The Authors

55
Table 1. Continued
Research areas
Representative works
(theoretical approach/es)a
Main research results

(representative works)
5. Differences in
adoption levels
(internalization)
Boiral (2003, 2007) [NI]

Naveh and Marcus (2004) [O]
Boiral and Roy (2007) [NI,TA]
Boiral (2007) [NI]
Nair and Prajogo (2009) [NI,TA]
Christmann and Taylor (2006) [SR]
Jang and Lin (2008) [NI,TA]
Yin and Schmeidler (2009) [NI,TA]
Boiral and Amara (2009) [NI,TA]
Heras-Saizarbitoria 2011 [NI, TA]
Different internalization levels of both ISO 9001 and ISO 14001

(Boiral and Roy 2007; Jang and Lin 2008; Naveh and Marcus
2004)
Discrepancy between written document and daily practices and
ritualistic/Symbolic adoption (Boiral 2003 2007; Christmann and
Taylor 2006)
Internalization rationale depending on institutional pressures and
internal involvement (Boiral 2007)
Internal drivers positively correlated to the depth of adoption
(Boiral and Amara 2009; Jang and Lin 2008; Yin and Schmeidler
2009) and Internalization with operational performance (Nair and
Prajogo 2009)
Heterogeneous internalization of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001
standards (Boiral 2007; Christmann and Taylor 2006;
Heras-Saizarbitoria 2011; Yin and Schmeidler 2009)
6. Integration of
standards
Karapetrovic and Willborn (1998) [TA]

Wilkinson and Dale (1999) [O]
Beckmerhagen et al. (2003) [TA]
Zutshi and Sohal (2005) [TA]
Zeng et al. (2006) [TA]
Salomone (2008) [TA]
Bernardo et al. (2009) [TA]
Academic controversy about integration models (Karapetrovic

and Willborn 1998; Wilkinson and Dale 1999)
Integration is often confused with the mere fusion of both
systems documentation procedures (Bernardo et al. 2009)
Different perspectives towards integrating ISO 9001 and ISO
14001 (Zeng et al. 2006; Zutshi and Sohal 2005)
7. Consultancy(A) and (A) Sakofsky (1993) [TA]

auditing(B) for
Vloeberghs and Bellens (1996) [O]
meta-standards
Marimn et al. (2002) [TA]
(B) Chan et al. (1993) [TA]
Williamson et al. (1996) [TA]
Terziovski and Power (2007) [O]
Boiral and Gendron (2011) [NI,O]
Gap between clients expectations and their perception of the

quality of the consulting service (Marimn et al. 2002)
The role of the auditor is critical for the adoption of
meta-standards (Williamson et al. 1996)
Quality auditors are frequently unfamiliar with the clients
industry and process or products/services (Terziovski and Power
2007)
Misconceptions of the certification and auditing practices in the
area of accountability for sustainable development (Boiral and
Gendron 2011)
a
TA, Technical Approaches; SR, self-regulation; DIS, decentralized institutions and signalling models; C&C, theory of cartels and clubs;
NI, New Institutionalism; O, Others (see the classification used in the paper).
world economy, subject to potential conflicts that may

arise as a consequence of the competing interests of
private businesses and civil society stakeholders, an
aspect which could constitute an extremely interesting subject for study and which has been little
exploited to date in relation to meta-standards. Similarly, the problem of developing countries limited
capacity to exert an influence on the process of creation of meta-standards is also a subject of great interest on which outstanding work has already been
carried out (e.g. Clapp 2001; Giovannucci and Ponte
2005; Nadvi 2008; Nadvi and Wltring 2004;
Summers 2003), despite the fact that there is still
much evidence to gather. In this research area, there is
no clear dominating theoretical approach.
In the second research area, there are several
studies carried out from the perspective of operations
management (Casadess et al. 2008; Corbett 2006;

Franceschini et al. 2004; Marimn et al. 2006;
Poksinska et al. 2003; Saraiva and Duarte 2003)
which have tried to model the diffusion of metastandards and have confirmed the existence of
similar diffusion patterns for different types of metastandard (e.g. ISO 9001, ISO 14001). In contrast,
other studies carried out from other non-technical
approaches have tried to analyse which factors
explain geographical differences in the diffusion of
meta-standards (Alburquerque et al. 2007; Corbett
2006; Corbett and Kirsch 2001; Delmas 2002; Grolleau et al. 2008; Guler et al. 2002; Neumayer and
Perkins 2005; Potoski and Prakash 2004; Terlaak and
King 2006; Vastag 2004). These studies stress that
a positive correlation exists between the number of
certificates and macro-economic variables such as
2012 The Authors

56
the volume of direct overseas investment and the

tendency to export to the EU. Alburquerque et al.
(2007) conclude that ISO 9001 is driven primarily by
geography and bilateral trade relations, whereas ISO
14001 is driven by geography and cultural similarity.
In short, although many interesting results have been
obtained, clear answers are still waiting to be found
to such elementary questions. In this research area,
the contributions made from a technical perspective
are the dominant ones, with a noteworthy influence
also from the approach of New Institutionalism.
The third research area is also very closely linked
to that of the previous section, i.e. with the study of
the pattern of diffusion of meta-standards. While the
majority of existing studies on this subject are of
an empirical character, with little development of
a theoretical framework, there are nonetheless a
certain number of noteworthy studies undertaken in
the context of a clear and consistent conceptual and
theoretical framework. In short, it can be said that
there are two main theoretical approaches to this
issue. From one perspective, based on the theoretical
model established by New Institutionalism, it is suggested that meta-standards are adopted due to pressures of an external nature (Braun 2005; Christmann
and Taylor 2001; Corbett and Kirsch 2001; Delmas
2002; Guler et al. 2002). This analytical perspective
is criticized by academics, who argue that organizations are dynamic and active and are able to respond
in different ways, according to their resources and
capacities (Balzarova and Castka 2008; Beck and
Walgenbach 2005; Christmann and Taylor 2003;
Darnall and Edwards 2006; King and Lenox 2001;
Nair and Prajogo 2009; Yin and Schmeidler 2009).
Other more pragmatic and technical contributions
have tried to establish a classification of the motivating forces that lead companies to implement and
certify meta-standards (e.g. Bansal and Roth 2000;
Gonzlez-Benito and Gonzlez-Benito 2005). In this
type of empirical literature, there is no clear consensus among specialists as to the main driving forces
behind meta-standards (on this issue, MartnezCosta et al. 2008; Prajogo 2011; Sampaio et al. 2009
are to be recommended for the extensive review that
is included of the literature on this subject).
In research area 4, the most quoted empirical
studies carried out from the technical perspective
have corroborated the positive effects or benefits of
both ISO 9001 (e.g. Arauz and Suzuki 2004; Briscoe
et al. 2005; Brown and Van der Wiele 1995, 1996;
Buttle 1997; Carlsson and Carlsson 1996; Casadess
and Karapetrovic 2005; Huarng et al. 1999; Jones
et al. 1997; Tsiotras and Gotzamani 1996) and ISO

14001 (e.g. Bansal and Bogner 2002; Corbett and
Russo 2001; Florida and Davidson 2001; King and
Lenox 2001; Melnyk et al. 2002; Montabon et al.
2000; Rondinelli and Vastag 2000; Russo and Harrison 2001;). Regarding the impact on performance,
several studies on ISO 9001 (e.g. Benner and Veloso
2008; Corbett et al. 2005; Dick et al. 2008; Hversj
2000; Martnez-Costa et al. 2008; Wayhan and
Balderson 2007) and ISO 14001 (e.g. Andrews
et al. 2003; Jiang and Bansal 2003; King et al. 2005;
Melnyk et al. 2003; Potoski and Prakash 2005;
Russo 2002) have used objective or factual measures
(i.e. accounting data, data on emissions), while the
majority of studies have used perceptual measures
obtained by surveys (i.e. based on questionnaires) to
analyse the impact of meta-standards on performance.5 Overall the results are mixed, but in a majority
of studies a significant positive relationship is
found between the adoption of meta-standards and a
companys performance. In this research area, the
contributions made from a technical perspective are
also the dominant ones.
Regarding research area 5, although the majority
of studies into the adoption of meta-standards assume
homogeneous adoption they concentrate on the
question of whether or not a company has third-party
certification as the sole criterion to demonstrate that
implementation has been completed more and more
studies are now beginning to emphasize the heterogeneity of their adoption both in the case of ISO 9001
(Boiral 2003; Vasconcelos and Vasconcelos 2003;
Arauz and Suzuki 2004; Naveh and Marcus 2004;
Biazzo 2005; Beck and Walgenbach, 2005; Briscoe
et al. 2005; Christmann and Taylor 2006; Boiral and
Roy 2007; Jang and Lin 2008; Nair and Prajogo 2009;
Heras-Saizarbitoria 2011) and for ISO 14001 (Boiral
2001; Boiral, 2007; Yin and Schmeidler 2009; HerasSaizarbitoria et al. 2011a). In the case of this research
area, it is clear that the theoretical approach of New
Institutionalism is the prevalent one.
The sixth research area is a more pragmatic/
operational one. The success of the diffusion of
management standards in various different fields of
company management has led organizations to consider their implementation in a single integrated
5
For a review of this type of study, Benner and Veloso

(2008), Martnez-Costa et al. (2009), Molina-Azorn et al.
(2009) and Sampaio et al. (2009) are interesting in the case
of ISO 9001, and Molina-Azorn et al. (2009) and HerasSaizarbitoria et al. (2011b) in the case of ISO 14001.
2012 The Authors

57
management system (Beckmerhagen et al. 2003;

Karapetrovic 2003; Karapetrovic and Willborn 1998;
Wilkinson and Dale 2001). At the same time, the
first studies analysing these aspects have begun to be
published in the academic world (Bernardo et al.
2009; Fresner and Engelhardt 2004; Salomone 2008;
Zeng et al. 2006; Zutshi and Sohal 2005). Given
the technical specialist nature of the theme, in this
research area it is also clear that the technical perspective is the dominant theoretical approach.
Finally, research area 7 deals with specialist consultancy and the third-party auditing and registration
industry related to meta-standards. Various studies of
the field have confirmed the importance of external
consultancy services in the process of adoption of
meta-standards (e.g. Marimn et al. 2002; Sakofsky
1993; Vloeberghs and Bellens 1996). Similarly,
although it is stressed that the role of the auditor is
critical for the adoption of meta-standards (Sakofsky
1993; Terziovski and Power 2007; Williamson et al.
1996) and requires careful interpretation and training, several studies point out that quality auditors
are frequently unfamiliar with the clients industry,
quality system and process or products/services, and
that this results in a poor-quality audit (Chan et al.
1993; Hutchins 1993; Williamson et al. 1996). In a
recent paper, Boiral and Gendron (2011) point out
that, although audit failure crises have not been as
prominent in the context of the audits of metastandards as they have been in the context of financial audits, There is a significant gap between the
imagery of rationality and infallibility surrounding
ISO audits and what these audits can actually deliver
(Boiral and Gendron 2011, p. 14). However, it should
be taken into account that the conclusions drawn
by the authors are not based on sufficient empirical
evidence, as they themselves acknowledge, which
is why empirical work will need to be carried out on
this interesting and controversial research area. In
this area, special mention should also be made of the
contributions made from a technical theoretical perspective, although attention should also be drawn to
the fact that interesting contributions are starting to
be published from the New Institutionalism perspective (e.g. Boiral and Gendron 2011), based on a more
developed and complex framework.
ture on meta-standards and the avenues for future

research, based on the most significant knowledge
gap identified. The concept of management standard
or meta-standard is complex, multi-faceted and
has been extensively analysed in the literature
from various perspectives, including operations
management, strategic management, international
economics, economic geography and organizational
sociology. The level of analysis has ranged from a
pragmatic approach to the more theoretical level, but
without much inter-relation between the various different research areas.
It can be stated that the conclusions drawn from
the extensive body of academic literature available
on the subject have helped us to understand better
why and how these standards have been developed
and disseminated. In this sense, the non-technical
contributions have proved to be of special interest
owing to the solid nature of the basic theoretical
principles they put forward. Nevertheless, there still
remain many issues to be explored and a set of key
knowledge gaps on which research should focus in
the future, using both quantitative and qualitative
research methods (see Table 2).
Regarding the diffusion of meta-standards,
since the temporal aspects of the adoption of metastandards might also be important, there could be a
link between these studies and others of a theoretical
and empirical nature which have already become
established features in the field of management, and
deal in particular with the influence of fashionable
practices in business management (Abrahamson
1991, 1996). It may also interesting to analyse the
impact of the global financial and economic crisis
on the decertification process, which has recently
started to be analysed in the relevant literature
(Casadess et al. 2008; Marimn et al. 2009)
something that concerns, above all, the ISO itself
(ISO 2005).
However, although many interesting results have
been obtained, clear answers are still waiting to be
found to such elementary questions as the relationship between the economic competitiveness of countries and the number of ISO certificates awarded.
Thus, very competitive economies such as Germany
and Finland have a relatively low level of certificates,
whereas less competitive countries (e.g. Italy, Spain,
Israel) have a very high level of certificates. In our
opinion, in order to make progress in this research
area, importance should be given to approaches
with a more pragmatic vision, which might be able
to throw light on this phenomenon, such as, for
Discussion and conclusion

The objective of this paper was to analyse, through
an integrative study, the main findings of the litera-
2012 The Authors

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews on the main pitfalls of meta-standards integration

Case studies on the difficulties faced by certified organizations depending on the implementation
model
Longitudinal studies on the evolution of standards integration and its main difficulties
Participant observation of certification audits
Interviews among certification auditors on the audits preparation, realization and following-up
Qualitative studies on the certification ethical issues based on the view of various stakeholders
(auditors, consultants, certified organizations, certification bodies.)
Cross-country comparative studies on the main characteristics of auditors: training, experience,
qualifications
Semi-directive interviews among various stakeholders (employees, managers, customers) on the
reliability and trustfulness of certification audits
Focus groups with financial and ISO auditors to shed light on the similarities and differences
between financial and ISO audits (preparation, ethical issues, commercial aspects)
The global crisis and its impact on the decertification process

Diffusion of meta-standards and management fads and fashions
Why are some countries or regions more receptive to meta-standards than others?
The importance of national goals and campaigns (public administrations prescriptive role)
The adaptation of meta-standards to specific cultures and social contexts (resistance to models
developed in wealthy countries, issues related to literacy degree)
The role of national organizations for standardization in the development of specific standards
Difficulties companies face during the integration process

Whether the implementation model pursued conditions the process
Analyse the consistency of external consultancy and auditing services

Is there a more helpful auditing style, or is there a race to the bottom?
For ISO 14001, do the third-party audits lead to the outsourcing of public environmental
inspection?
Ethical issues of certification process: conflicts of interests, lack of auditors independence
Relationships and differences between meta-standard certification and financial audits
Perception of the reliability and trustfulness of certification in the eyes of different stakeholders
The impact of training, qualifications and professionalism of auditors and consultants on the
certification process
3. Motivations to adopt
meta-standards
4. Benefits of adoption
and impact on
performance
5. Differences in adoption
levels (internalization)
6. Integration of standards
7. Consultancy and
auditing for
meta-standards
Symbolic adoption of CSR meta-standards

Role of certification process in the internalization of meta-standards
Different levels of internalization inside the same organization
Contingency factors explaining the meta-standards integration levels
Different configurations of internalization
Changes over time in the dominant adoption models
Confusion in the attribution of causation

Employees perceptions of meta-standards impacts
Costs and benefits of the certification process
Role of auditors and consultants in improving the effectiveness of meta-standards
The impact of global crisis
Impacts of new meta-standards such as ISO 26000
Impacts of integrating multiple meta-standards such as ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certification
Critical success factors in meta-standards implementation
No clear consensus to identify the main drivers

Most of the previous surveys are based on the opinion of managers (potential bias)
Regional differences in the motivation for adopting specific standards
The motivations for choosing not to renew certification
2. International diffusion
process of
meta-standards
Case studies on the different levels of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 adoption inside the same
organization
Longitudinal case studies on the evolution of the meta-standards dominant adoption models
Interviews performed outside the workplace in order to reduce bias related to organizational
rhetoric of success
Cross-country comparative studies on the differences in adoption levels
Case studies on the costs and benefits of the certification process

Longitudinal studies on long-range impacts of certification
Quantitative studies on the impacts and success factors of integrating both ISO 9001 and ISO
14001 standards
Quantitative studies on the impact of global crisis on ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 integration
Cross-country comparative studies on the impacts of meta-standards
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews on the effectiveness of certifiable standards
Cross-country comparative studies on the motivations for the adoption of meta-standards

Perceptions of various stakeholders (employees, customers) of the main drivers for certification
Case studies on the reasons for certification renewal
Cross-country comparative studies on the reasons explaining the decertification process

Quantitative studies based on the international distribution and tendencies concerning the number
of certified organizations
Qualitative studies of national organizations for standardization on challenges raised by the
cultural adaptation of various meta-standards
Case studies and comparative analysis of certified organizations from various countries
Semi-directive interviews among members of ISO technical committees in charge of the

development of new meta-standards
Participant observation at meetings organized by ISO technical committees
Content analysis of documents from organizations for standardization
Complex process of creation of many meta-standards (e.g. SA 8000, ISO 26000)

Study the complex networks of public and private stakeholders related to meta-standards and
their potential conflicts
Mechanisms to overcome the developing countries inability to influence the process
1. Creation of
meta-standards and
implications for global
governance
Possible research methods
Knowledge gaps
Research areas
Table 2. Knowledge gaps on meta-standards: a research agenda
58
2012 The Authors

59
example, those approaches which gather specific

evidence linked to the various different public and
private programmes to promote meta-standards that
have been established in an international context.
As far as studies that attempt to analyse the
motivation behind adopting meta-standards are concerned, the perceptions of not only general managers,
but also of internal stakeholders (such as middle
managers or workers themselves who do not perform
management tasks) and those outside the company
(customers, suppliers, consultants and auditors)
should be taken into account. In this way, a richer
and more complete view of a process as complex as
the one we are faced with could be obtained. In the
case of studies that attempt to analyse the impact on
performance based on perceptual or self-reporting
measurements, problems of bias should be taken
into account. Thus, Corbett et al. (2005), Heras et al.
(2002), Wayhan and Balderson (2007), Wayhan et al.
(2002) and Yin and Schmeidler (2009) have pointed
out possible bias related to performance variables
based on managers ratings or on data supplied by
the companies themselves, since the person providing the information has a personal interest in overvaluing it. Thus, when it is possible, it seems better to
ensure the use of more objective data or indicators
from existing records (e.g. commercial databases
containing economic and financial information,
or publicly available databases with information
on environmental performance). Furthermore, as
stressed by Christmann and Taylor (2006), future
research on the drivers for the adoption of metastandards should go beyond treating customers as
a homogeneous group by including the types of
requirements and preferences that different customers impose on suppliers.
However, there is no doubt that one of the most
thought-provoking research areas owing to its
diverse implications is that related to the internalization of meta-standards (research area 5). There is a
clear knowledge gap in this field, and empirical
studies (especially those based on quantitative
methodology) are necessary in order to analyse the
perceptions of the various stakeholders with regard
to the process of adoption and internalization of
meta-standards. Furthermore, as both Christmann
and Taylor (2006) and Nair and Prajogo (2009) have
pointed out, owing to the increasing importance of
context dependence, future research should explore
the sources of variation in the quality of implementation of meta-standards in cross-country studies
with different cultures and political environments. As
Christmann and Taylor (2006) underlined, researchers need to acknowledge the limitation of certification as a measure, and need to evaluate how
variations in the quality of standard implementation
may affect their results.
Finally, for future work, research should also focus
on studying audits by third parties one of the processes that characterize the phenomenon of metastandards and one which has not received much
attention from researchers in recent years. It would be
interesting to analyse the consistency of external
auditing services rigorously, limited as they are by the
fact that they are contracted and paid for by the
company that wishes to become certified. This issue
has already been analysed in other areas of business
as a result of the accounting scandals that occurred in
the US a few years ago and, more recently, with the
problems facing credit-rating institutions in the financial crisis that arose in 2008. Indeed, as has been
demonstrated by recent scandals in the accountancy
sector and the financial market, third-party audit
of meta-standards an activity that shares certain
features with that of account auditing and creditrating is no guarantee of honesty (Boiral and
Gendron 2011; King et al. 2005). This question might
be related to a possible erosion of the prestige and
credibility of management standards, a danger which
has been pointed out ever since the phenomenon
began (Askey and Dale 1994). Thus, with a view to the
future it would also be interesting to analyse whether,
as a result of the rapid expansion in the diffusion of
meta-standards, the quality of audits has improved,
with better-trained and better-qualified auditors being
able to provide a more helpful auditing style, as some
authors maintain (e.g. Terziovski and Power 2007),
or whether it is rather the case that a rapid decline in
quality has taken place. As pointed out by Brumm
(1997), the existence of many entities capable of
performing the required audits and issuing the relevant certificates was pointed out as a weakness that
favoured instrumental implementation practices, contributing to the erosion of the prestige and credibility
of meta-standards, as recently stressed by several
authors (e.g. Boiral and Gendron 2011; Christmann
and Taylor 2006; Yeung and Mok 2005).
In short, further critical and rigorous empirical
studies are necessary in order to analyse the real
perceptions of the various stakeholders (consumers,
managers, suppliers, intermediary clients, workers
and public administration) regarding the adoption of
meta-standards and their effects. However, in order
for the results of such research to constitute a clear
2012 The Authors

60
contribution to an improvement in knowledge about

this phenomenon, the multidisciplinary orientation
of these studies is an essential requirement.
Meta-standards regulate management practices
in a broad range of companies around the globe. The
study of the complex role of the adoption of these
meta-standards by researchers of very different backgrounds and different cultural and political environments could provide valuable contributions to a
better understanding of their real role, for both academic and practitioner purposes.
Lastly and as far as the limitations of the review
of literature conducted are concerned, we wonder
whether the concept of meta-standard has sufficient
maturity or, in other words, has a sufficiently solid
conceptual foundation, given the continued fragmentation of the management field (Hodgkinson 2001).
Nevertheless, as we have attempted to argue in this
paper, we understand that, despite its complexity
and clearly multi-faceted nature, the concept of
meta-standard meets these requirements and is a
sufficiently mature, clear and well-defined management concept. Furthermore, we must also consider
whether the possible subjective bias in the work is a
limitation. Indeed, as is the case with all integrative
reviews about a multi-faceted and complex subject
matter such as the one studied here, in which reviews
are not of an obviously systematic nature, it is clear
that other ways of mapping the academic knowledge
in the field might well exist. For example, other
authors might define approaches that have tended
to study meta-standards in the academic literature
differently. Despite the limitations referred to, we
understand that reviews such as the one contained in
this work are necessary to the field, to give, among
other reasons, other researchers who are interested in
reviewing this complex line of work cause to make
further contributions that may start to clarify and
provide evidence of the maturity of this field.
References
Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D. (2001). International standards
and international governance. Journal of European Public
Policy, 8, pp. 345370.
Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D. (2006). The governance
triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow
of the state. Working Paper, Global Governance Project,
Oxford University.
Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fad and fashion:
the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of
Management Review, 16, pp. 586612.
Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of

Management Review, 21, pp. 254285.
Alburquerque, P., Bronnenberg, B.J. and Corbettt, C.J.
(2007). A spatiotemporal analysis of the global diffusion
of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 certification. Management
Science, 53, pp. 451468.
Anderson, S.W., Daly, J.D. and Johnson, M.F. (1999). Why
firms seek ISO 9000 certification: regulatory compliance
or competitive advantage? Production & Operations
Management, 8, pp. 2843.
Andrews, R.N., Amaral, D., Darnall, N., Gallagher, D.R.,
Edwards, D. Jr, Huston, A., Amore, C.D., Sun, L. and
Zhang, Y. (2003). Environmental management systems:
do they improve performance? Available at http://www.
c2e2.org/documents/emsivolumei.pdf (accessed 5 March
2012).
Antonelli, C. (1998). Localized technological change and
the evolution of standards as economic institutions. In
Chandler, A.D., Hagstrm, P. and Slvell, . (eds), The
Dynamic Firm The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arauz, R. and Suzuki, H. (2004). ISO 9000 performance
in Japanese industries. Total Quality Management &
Business Excellence, 15, pp. 333.
Askey, J.M. and Dale, B.G. (1994). From ISO series
registration to total quality management: an examination.
Quality Management Journal, 1, pp. 6776.
Balzarova, M.A. and Castka, P. (2008). Underlying mechanisms in the maintenance of ISO 14001 environmental
management system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16,
pp. 19491957.
Bansal, P. and Bogner, W. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001:
economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35, pp. 269290.
Bansal, P. and Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic explanations
for the early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business
Ethics, 46, pp. 289299.
Bansal, P. and Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a
model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp. 717736.
Beck, N. and Walgenbach, P. (2005). Technical efficiency of
adaptation to institutional expectations? The adoption of
ISO 9000 standards in the German mechanical engineering industry, Organization Studies, 26, pp. 841866.
Beckmerhagen, I., Berg, H., Karapetrovic, S. and Willborn,
W. (2003). Integration, of management systems: focus on
safety in the nuclear industry, International Journal of
Quality and Reliability Management. 20, pp. 209227.
Benner, M.J. and Veloso, F.M. (2008). ISO 9000 practices
and financial performance: a technology coherence
perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26,
pp. 611629.
Bernardo, M., Casadesus, M., Karapetrovic, S. and Heras, I.
(2009). How integrated are environmental, quality and
other standardized management systems? An empirical
study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, pp. 742750.
2012 The Authors

61
Biazzo, S. (2005). The new ISO 9001 and the problem of

ceremonial conformity: how have audit methods evolved?
Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16,
pp. 381400.
Boiral, B. and Gendron, Y. (2011). Sustainable development
and certification practices: lessons learned and prospects.
Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, pp. 331347.
Boiral, O. (2001). ISO 14001 certification in multinational
firms: the paradoxes of integration. Global Focus, 13,
pp. 7994.
Boiral, O. (2003). ISO 9000, outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14, pp. 720737.
Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a
rational myth? Organization Science, 18, pp. 127146.
Boiral, O. (2011). Managing with ISO systems: lessons from
practice. Long Range Planning, 3, pp. 197220.
Boiral, O. and Amara, N. (2009). Paradoxes of ISO 9000
performance: a configurational approach.Quality Management Journal, 16, pp. 3660.
Boiral, O. and Roy, M.J. (2007). ISO 9000: integration rationales and organizational impacts. International Journal of
Operations & Production Management, 27, pp. 226247.
Braun, B. (2005). Building global institutions: the diffusion
of management standards in the world economy an
institutional perspective. In Alvstam, C.G. and Schamp,
E.W. (eds), Linking Industries across the World. London:
Ashgate, pp. 327.
Briscoe, J.A., Fawcett, S.E. and Todd, R.H. (2005). The
implementation and impact of ISO 9000 among small
manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Small Business
Brown, A. and Van der Wiele, T. (1995). Industry experience
with ISO 9000. Asia Pacific Management, 4, pp. 818.
Brown, A. and Van der Wiele, T. (1996). A typology of
approaches to ISO certification and TQM. Australian
Journal of Management, 21, pp. 5772.
Brumm, E. (1997). Managing records for ISO9000 compliance. Quality Progress, 28, pp. 7377.
Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B. (2000). The contemporary
expansion of standardization. In Brunsson, N. and
B. Jacobsson (eds), A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 117.
Buttle, F. (1997). ISO 9000: marketing motivations and
benefits, International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Carlsson, M. and Carlsson, D. (1996). Experiences of
implementing ISO 9000 in Swedish industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,
13, pp. 3647.
Casadess, M. and Karapetrovic, S. (2005). Has ISO 9000
lost some of its lustre: a longitudinal impact study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, pp. 580596.
Casadess, M., Marimn, F. and Heras, I. (2008). ISO 14001
diffusion after the success of the ISO 9001 model. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 16, pp. 17111822.
Casper, S. and Hancke, B. (1999). Global quality norms

within national production regimes: ISO 9000 standards
in the French and German car industries. Organizational
Studies, 20, pp. 961985.
Chan, F.Y., Willborn, W., Xiao, H. and Li, H. (1993).
Research report: an expert system for quality management auditing. Asia Pacific Journal of Quality Management, 2, pp. 6572.
Christmann, P. and Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization of
the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation
in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32,
pp. 439458.
Christmann, P. and Taylor, G. (2003). Environmental
self-regulation in the global economy: the role of firm
capabilities. Multinationals, Environment and Global
Competition, 9, pp. 119145.
Christmann, P. and Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation
through international certifiable standards: determinants
of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal
of International Business Studies, 37, pp. 863883.
Clapp, J. (2001). ISO environmental standards: industrys
gift to a polluted globe or the developed worlds
competition-killing strategy? In Bergesen, H.O., Parmann,
G. and Thommessen, .B. (eds), Yearbook of International
Cooperation on Environment and Development 2001.
London: Earthscan Publications, pp. 2733.
Corbett, C.J. (2006). Global diffusion of ISO 9000 certification through supply chains. Manufacturing and Service
Operations Management, 8, pp. 330350.
Corbett, C.J. and Kirsch, D.A. (2001). International
diffusion of ISO 14000 certification. Production and
Corbett, C.J. and Russo, M. (2001). ISO 14001: irrelevant
or invaluable. ISO Management Systems, December,
pp. 2329.
Corbett, C.J. and Yeung, A.C.L. (2008). Special issue
on meta-standards in operations management: crossdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of
Production Economics, 113, pp. 12.
Corbett, C.J., Montes-Sancho, M.J. and Kirsch, D. (2005).
The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the
United States: an empirical analysis. Management
Science, 51, pp. 10461059.
Darnall, N. and Edwards, J.D. (2006). Predicting the cost
of environmental management system adoption: the role
of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 301320.
Delmas, M. (2001). Stakeholders and competitive advantage: the case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations
Delmas, M. (2002). The diffusion of environmental
management standards in Europe and in the United
States: an institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35,
pp. 91119.
Delmas, M.A. and Montiel, I. (2008). The diffusion of voluntary international management standards: responsible
2012 The Authors

62
care, ISO 9000 and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry.

Policy Studies Journal, 1, pp. 6593.
Diaye, M.-A., Ghabri, S., Greenan, N. and Pekovic, S.
(2007). ISO 9000 norm as a club good: network effect
evidence from French employer survey, public economics
and the provision of global public goods. INFER Workshop, Galway City, September.
Dick, G.P.M., Heras, I. and Casadess, M. (2008). Shedding
light on causation between ISO 9001 and improved business performance. International Journal of Operations &
Production Management, 28, pp. 687708.
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1991). The Iron Cage
Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective
Rationality in Organizational Fields. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Douglas, A. and Glen, D. (2000). Integrated management
systems in small and medium enterprises. Total Quality
Escanciano, C., Fernandez, E. and Vazquez, C. (2001).
ISO 9000 certification and quality management in Spain:
results of a national survey. TQM Magazine, 13, pp. 192
200.
Florida, R. and Davidson, D. (2001). Gaining from green
management: environmental management systems inside
and outside the factory. California Management Review,
43, pp. 6484.
Franceschini, F., Galetto, M. and Gianni, G. (2004). A new
forecasting model for the diffusion of ISO 9000 standard
certifications in European countries. International Journal
of Quality & Reliability Management, 21, pp. 3250.
Fresner, J. and Engelhardt, G. (2004). Experiences with integrated management systems for two small companies in
Austria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, pp. 623631.
Furusten, S. (2000). The knowledge base of standards. In
Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B. (eds), A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 7184.
Giovannucci, D. and Ponte, S. (2005). Standards as a new
form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the
coffee industry. Food Policy, 30, pp. 284301.
Gonzlez-Benito, J. and Gonzlez-Benito, O. (2005). An
analysis of the relationship between environmental motivations and ISO 14001 certification. British Journal of
Gonzlez-Torre, P., Adenso-Daz, B. and Gonzlez, B.
(2001). Empirical evidence about managerial issues of
ISO certification. TQM Magazine, 13, pp. 355360.
Grolleau, G., Lamri, J. and Mzoughi, N. (2008). Dterminants de la diffusion internationale de la norme ISO
14001, Economie Prvision, 185, pp. 123138.
Guler, I., Guillen, M.F. and MacPherson, J.M. (2002). Global
competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: the international spread of ISO 9000
quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47,
pp. 207232.
Haufler, V. (1999). Negotiating International Standards
for Environmental Management Systems: the ISO 14000
Standards. New York: UN Vision Project on Global Public

Policy Networks, UN.
Hversj, T. (2000). The financial effects of ISO 9000
registration for Danish companies. Managerial Auditing
Journal, 15, pp. 4752.
Heras, I., Dick, G.P.M. and Casadess, M. (2002). ISO 9000
registrations impact on sales and profitability: a longitudinal analysis of performance before and after accreditation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2011). Internalization of ISO 9000:
an exploratory study. Industrial Management & Data
Systems, 111, pp. 12141237.
Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Arana, G. and Molina-Azorn, J.F.
(2011a). Do drivers matter for the benefits of ISO 14001?
International Journal of Operations & Production
Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Molina-Azorn, F.J. and Dick, G.P.
(2011b). ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: Selection effect versus treatment effect. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 19, pp. 112.
Hodgkinson, G.P. (ed.) (2001). Facing the future: the nature
and purpose of management research re-assessed. British
Journal of Management, 12, pp. 180.
Huarng, F., Horng, C. and Chen, C. (1999). A study of ISO
9000 process, motivation and performance. Total Quality
Hutchins, G. (1993). ISO 9000: a Comprehensive Guide to
Registration, Audit Guidelines and Successful Certification. Williston, VT: Oliver Wight.
ISO (2005). The ISO Survey of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000
Certifications: 14th cycle. Geneva: ISO.
ISO (2011). The ISO Survey of Certifications 2010. Geneva:
ISO.
Jang, W. and Lin, C. (2008). An integrated framework
for ISO 9000 motivation, depth of ISO implementation
and firm performance. The case of Taiwan. Journal of
Manufacturing Technology Management, 19, pp. 194
216.
Jiang, R.J. and Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO
14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40, pp. 1047
1067.
Jones, R., Arndt, G. and Kustin, R. (1997). ISO 9000
amongst Australian companies: impact of time and
reasons for seeking certification on perceptions of
benefits received. International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management, 14, pp. 650660.
Karapetrovic, S. (2002). Strategies for the integration of
management systems and standards. TQM Magazine, 14,
pp. 6167.
Karapetrovic, S. (2003). Musings on integrated management systems. Measuring Business Excellence, 7,
pp. 413.
Karapetrovic, S. and Willborn, W. (1998). Connecting
internal management systems in service organizations.
Managing Service Quality, 8, pp. 256271.
2012 The Authors

63
Kerret, D. (2008). ISO 14001 as an environmental capacity

building tool variations among nations environmental
science. Technology, 42, pp. 27732779.
King, A.A. and Lenox, M.J. (2000). Industry self-regulation
without sanctions: the chemical industrys responsible
care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43,
pp. 698716.
King, A.A. and Lenox, M.J. (2001). Who adopts management standards early? An examination of ISO 14001
certifications. Academy of Management Proceedings.
Washington DC: Academy of Management, pp. A1A6.
King, A.A. and Toffel, M.W. (2009). Self-regulatory institutions for solving environmental problems: perspectives
and contributions from the management literature. In
Delmas, M. and Young, O. (eds), Governance for the
Environment: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, pp. 193215.
King, A.A., Lenox, M.J. and Terlaak, A.K. (2005). The
strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring
certification with the ISO 14001 management standard.
Academy of Management Journal, 48, pp. 10911106.
Kunnanatt, J.T. (2007). Impact of ISO 9000 on organizational climate: strategic change management experience
of an Indian organization. International Journal of
Manpower, 28, pp. 175192.
Macpherson, A. and Jones, O. (2010). Editorial: strategies
for the development of international journal of management reviews. International Journal of Management
Reviews., 12, pp. 107113.
Marimn, F., Casadess, M. and Heras, I. (2002). Do quality
consultants offer a quality service? Total Quality Management, 13, pp. 797811.
Marimn, F., Casadess, M. and Heras, I. (2006). ISO 9000
and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion
model. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26, pp. 141165.
Marimn, F., Heras, I. and Casadess, M. (2009). ISO 9000
and ISO 14000 standards: a projection model for the
decline phase. Total Quality Management & Business
Excellence, 1, pp. 121.
Martnez-Costa, M., Choi, T.Y., Martnez, J.A. and
Martnez-Lorente, A.R. (2009). ISO 9000/1994, ISO
9001/2000 and TQM: the performance debate revisited.
Journal of Operations Management, 27, pp. 495511.
Martnez-Costa, M., Martnez-Lorente, A.R. and Choi, T.Y.
(2008). Simultaneous consideration of TQM and ISO
9000 on performance and motivation: an empirical study
of Spanish companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, pp. 2339.
Melnyk, S.A., Sroufe, R.P., Calantone, R.L. and Montabon,
F.L. (2002). Assessing the effectiveness of US voluntary
environmental programs: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Research, 40, pp. 1853
1878.
Melnyk, S.A., Sroufe, R.P., Calantone, R.L. and Montabon,
F.L. (2003). A model of site-specific antecedents of ISO
14001 certification. Production and Operations Management, 12, pp. 417.

Mendel, P.J. (2001). Global Models of Organization:
International Management Standards, Reforms, and
Movements. Dissertation, Department of Sociology.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Mendel, P.J. (2002). International standardization and
global governance: the spread of quality and environmental management standards. In Hoffman, A. and
Ventresca, M. (eds), Organizations, Policy, and the
Natural Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press, pp. 407434.
Moatazed-Keivani, R., Ghanbari-Parsa, A.R. and Kagaya, S.
(1999). ISO 9000 standards: perceptions and experiences
in the UK construction industry. Construction Management & Economics, 17, pp. 107119.
Molina-Azorn, J.F., Tar, J.J., Claver-Corts, E. and
Lpez-Gamero, M.D. (2009). Quality management.
Environmental Management, 11, pp. 197222.
Montabon, F., Melnyk, S.A., Sroufe, R. and Calantone, R.J.
(2000). ISO 14000: assessing its perceived impact on
corporate performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(2), pp. 416.
Nadvi, K. (2008). Global standards, global governance
and the organization of global value chains. Journal of
Economic Geography, 8, pp. 323343.
Nadvi, K. and Wltring, F. (2004). Making sense of global
standards. In Schmitz, H. (ed.), Local Enterprises in the
Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 5394.
Nair, A. and Prajogo, D. (2009). Internalisation of ISO
9000 standards: the antecedent role of functionalist
and institutionalist drivers and performance implications. International Journal of Production Research, 47,
pp. 45454568.
Naveh, E. and Marcus, A.A. (2004). When does the ISO 9000
quality assurance standard lead to performance improvement? Assimilation and going beyond. IEEE Transactions
on Engineering management, 3, pp. 352363.
Neumayer, E. and Perkins, R. (2004). What explains the
uneven takeup of ISO14001 at the global level? A panel
data analysis. Environment, 36, pp. 823839.
Neumayer, E. and Perkins, R. (2005). Uneven geographies
of organizational practice: explaining the cross-national
transfer and adoption of ISO 9000. Economic Geography,
81, pp. 237259.
ORourke, D. (2006). Multi-stakeholder regulation: privatizing or socializing global labor standards? World Development, 34, pp. 899918.
Poksinska, B., Dahlgaard, J.J. and Eklund, J.A.E. (2003).
Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits
and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of
Quality & Reliability Management, 20, pp. 585606.
Potoski, M. and Prakash, A. (2004). Regulatory convergence
in nongovernmental regimes: cross-national adoption of
ISO 14001 certification. Journal of Politics, 66, pp. 885
905.
2012 The Authors

64
Potoski, M. and Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with

weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities environmental
performance. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 24,
pp. 745769.
Potoski, M. and Prakash, A. (2009). Information asymmetries as trade barriers: ISO 9000 increases international
commerce. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,
28, pp. 221238.
Power, M. (2003). Auditing and the production of
legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28,
pp. 379394.
Prajogo, D.I. (2011). The roles of firms motives in affecting
the outcomes of ISO 9000 adoption. International Journal
of Operations & Production Management, 31, pp. 78100.
Prakash, A. and Potoski, M. (2006). The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary
Environmental Regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prakash, A. and Potoski, M. (2007). Collective action
through voluntary environmental programs: a club theory
perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 35, pp. 773792.
Roht-Arriaza, N. (2000). Soft law in a hybrid organization:
the international organization for standardization. In
Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: the Role
of Non-Binding Norms in the International System.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 263281.
Rondinelli, D. and Vastag, G. (2000). Panacea, common
sense or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management
Journal, 18, pp. 499510.
Russo, M. and Harrison, A. (2001). An empirical study
of the impact of ISO 14001 registration on emissions
performance. Paper presented at the Ninth Greening of
Industry Network Annual Conference, 2124 Janaury,
Bangkok, Thailand.
Russo, M.V. (2002). Institutional change & organizational
strategy: ISO 14001 and emissions in the electronics
industry. Paper presented at the 62nd Meeting of the
Academy of Management, Denver, CO, August.
Ruwet, C. (2011). Towards a democratization of standards
development? Internal dynamics of ISO in the context of
globalization, New Global Studies, 5, pp. 126.
Sakofsky, S. (1993). Twelve ways to make a quality audit
work for you. Journal of Quality and Participation, 16,
pp. 3032.
Salomone, R. (2008). Integrated management systems:
experiences in Italian organizations. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 16, pp. 17861806.
Sampaio, P., Saraiva, P. and Rodrigues, A.G. (2009). ISO
9001 certification research: questions, answers and
approaches. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26, pp. 3858.
Santos, L. and Escanciano, C. (2002). Benefits of the ISO
9000: 1994 system: some considerations to reinforce
competitive advantage. International Journal of Quality
& Reliability Management, 19, pp. 321344.
Saraiva, P.M. and Duarte, B. (2003). ISO 9000: some

statistical results for a worldwide phenomenon. TQM &
Business Excellence, 14, pp. 11691178.
Summers, S.S. (2003). Perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy
in international environmental management standards:
the impact of the participation gap, Global Environmental
Politics, 3, pp. 4773.
Sun, H. (2000). Total quality management, ISO 9000 certification and performance improvement, International
Journal of Quality Reliability Management, 17, pp. 168
179.
Terlaak, A. and King, A.A. (2006). The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: a
signalling approach. Journal of Economics Behavior &
Organization, 60, pp. 579602.
Terziovski, M. and Power, D. (2007). Quality audit roles
and skills: perceptions of non-financial auditors and
their clients. Journal of Operations Management, 28,
pp. 7377.
Terziovski, M., Power, D. and Sohal, A. (2003). The longitudinal effects of the ISO 9000 certification process on
business performance. European Journal of Operational
Research, 143, pp. 580595.
Tsiotras, G. and Gotzamani, K. (1996). ISO 9000 as an entry
key to TQM: the case of Greek industry. International
Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 13,
pp. 6476.
Uzumeri, M. (1997). ISO 9000 and other meta-standards:
principles for management practice? Academy of Management Executive, 11, pp. 2136.
Vasconcelos, I.F.G. and Vasconcelos, F.C. (2003). ISO9000,
consultants and paradoxes: a sociological analysis of
quality assurance and human resource techniques. RAC,
Revista De Administraion Contemporanea, 7, pp. 173
194.
Vastag, G. (2004). Revisiting ISO 14001 diffusion: a new
look at the drivers of certification. Production and
Vloeberghs, D. and Bellens, J. (1996). Implementing the
ISO 9000 standards in Belgium. Quality Progress, 29,
pp. 4348.
Vogel, D.J. (2008). Private global business regulation.
Annual Review of Political Science., 11, pp. 261282.
Walgenbach, P. (2001). The production of distrust by means
of producing trust. Organization Studies, 22, pp. 693714.
Wayhan, V.B. and Balderson, E.L. (2007). TQM and financial performance: what has empirical research discovered? Total Quality Managemen & Business Excellence,
18, pp. 403412.
Wayhan, V.B., Kirche, E.T. and Khumawala, B.M. (2002).
ISO 9000 certification: the financial performance implications. Total Quality Management, 7, pp. 217231.
Wilkinson, G. and Dale, B.G. (1999). Models of management system standards: a review of the integration
issues. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3,
pp. 279298.
2012 The Authors

65
Wilkinson, G. and Dale, B.G. (2001). Integrated management systems: a model based on a total quality approach.
Managing Service Quality, 11, pp. 318330.
Williamson, A., Rogerson, J.H. and Vella, A.D. (1996).
Quality system auditors attitudes and methods: a survey.
International Journal of Quality Reliability and Management, 13, pp. 3952.
Yeung, G. and Mok, V. (2005). What are the impacts of
implementing ISOs on the competitiveness of manufacturing industry in China? Journal of World Business, 40,
pp. 139157.
Yin, H. and Schmeidler, P.J. (2009). Why do standardized
ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to
heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, pp. 469486.
Zeng, S., Shi, J. and Lou, G. (2006). A synergetic model
for implementing an integrated management system: an
empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production,
15, pp. 17601767.
Zutshi, A. and Sohal, A. (2005). Integrated management
system. The experience of three Australian organizations.
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16,
pp. 211232.
2012 The Authors


18 - (2013) Heras-Saizarbitoria &amp; Boiral - IsO 9001 and ISO 14001

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

18 - (2013) Heras-Saizarbitoria &amp; Boiral - IsO 9001 and ISO 14001

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

bs_bs_banner

International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 15, 4765 (2013)

ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a

Iaki Heras-Saizarbitoria and Olivier Boiral1

responsibility (e.g. SA 8000). These standards tend

2012 The Authors

I. Heras-Saizarbitoria and O. Boiral

and thus improve academic knowledge, which is

propose various avenues for future research based

Standardization and meta-standards

2012 The Authors

Research Agenda on Management System Standards

ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: the first

2012 The Authors

I. Heras-Saizarbitoria and O. Boiral

of the world economy, which requires the adoption of

Approaches to the academic study

governance and regulation2 (e.g. Haufler 1999), those

At this point we would like to express our gratitude for the

These approaches focus on the practical implications

2012 The Authors

Research Agenda on Management System Standards

In short, this first standpoint also includes in

the inability of some countries to establish a system

The International Organization for Standardization was

2012 The Authors

I. Heras-Saizarbitoria and O. Boiral

preparation, adoption and application of standards

of stakeholders, rather than a single central authority,

The notion of information asymmetries is also

2012 The Authors

Research Agenda on Management System Standards

Meta-standards have also been analysed from the

distinguishing feature of this sub-approach is that

Other followers of this line of theory maintain that these

A research agenda on meta-standards

2012 The Authors

I. Heras-Saizarbitoria and O. Boiral

Table 1. Academic study of meta-standards: an integrative review

Main research results

Haufler (1999) [O]

Creation of meta-standards is a complex political process (Clapp

Positive correlation between certificates and macro-economic

Bansal and Roth (2000) [NI,TA]

Different typology of motivation: internal vs external

(A) Carlsson and Carlsson (1996) [TA]

Main benefits of ISO 9001: improvement of operational

2012 The Authors

Research Agenda on Management System Standards

Main research results

Boiral (2003, 2007) [NI]

Different internalization levels of both ISO 9001 and ISO 14001

Karapetrovic and Willborn (1998) [TA]

Academic controversy about integration models (Karapetrovic

7. Consultancy(A) and (A) Sakofsky (1993) [TA]

Gap between clients expectations and their perception of the

world economy, subject to potential conflicts that may

management (Casadess et al. 2008; Corbett 2006;

2012 The Authors

I. Heras-Saizarbitoria and O. Boiral

the volume of direct overseas investment and the

et al. 1997; Tsiotras and Gotzamani 1996) and ISO

For a review of this type of study, Benner and Veloso

2012 The Authors

18 - (2013) Heras-Saizarbitoria & Boiral - IsO 9001 and ISO 14001

18 - (2013) Heras-Saizarbitoria & Boiral - IsO 9001 and ISO 14001