Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How can scientists, engineers, and citizens be better prepared to cope with
earthquake hazards? Can scientists protect Earth's population by predicting
earthquakes? Through hands-on activities, students will explore the fascinating
world of earthquake forecasting: why and how earthquakes happen,
uncertainty and chaos theory in earthquake prediction, cutting-edge research in
earthquake forecasts, and important debates about quake predictability.
Grade/Subject
Earth Science
Objectives
Time
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
5 min
15 min
15 min
10 min
15 min
25 min
5 min
Variable
Variable
Materials
21st Century
Curriculum
Instructional
Strategies
1. Please note that in addition to the strategies outlined here, script &/or
additional hints are included in the Notes for individual slides in the
PowerPoint presentation for this lesson
2. Anticipatory set: Noteworthy Quakes
Use the PowerPoint presentation. Slide 2 presents the lesson objectives.
Slide 3 emphasizes the point that we seem always to be hearing or seeing news
about earthquakes somewhere in the world and its because earthquakes are
always happening! Click on the photo to load & play an animation showing
earthquake activity in the Western U.S. during just one week in March 2006.
Color key for the quakes is: yellow = Magnitude <2, orange = Magnitude 2-5,
red = Magnitude >5
Slides 4 & 5 summarize information about the deadly Sichuan, China,
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
earthquake of May 2008, and Slides 6-9 highlight the destructive earthquake
and tsunami of December 2004.
Even Virginia has had its share of recent noteworthy earthquakes. Slides 10 &
11 present information about two relatively large Virginia earthquakes during
2003. On Slide 11 point out the extensive area of light blue on the map, of
Mercalli Intensity IV (good opportunity to reinforce Mercalli Scale), in which
people experienced light shaking. Students in Richmond and the surrounding
area may have felt one or both of these quakes. Ask students to share their own
experiences with these quakes.
Slide 12 indicates that the December 2003 Virginia quake is on a USGS list of
most felt earthquakes. Ask the students why they think our quake is #3, also
why places like Tennessee & Indiana are also in the Top Ten, why so many of
the quakes in the Top Ten are relatively low magnitude none of these places
being earthquake hotbeds and only one is from the western U.S., where there
is much more seismic activity. (Very likely Virginians noted & reported that
they felt the quake because it was a very unusual experience, whereas in places
where there are many frequent small quakes that many people get used to them
& probably pay little attention to them.)
3. ACTIVITY: Quake Quiz Part 1 and Discussion
After displaying Slide 13, distribute the Quake Quiz Are You the Next
Principal Prestigious Prognosticator of Tremulous Terrain? and have the
students complete Part 1 (on the front of the paper). This will normally take
only a few minutes.
After students have completed the quiz, show Slides 14-16. All four statements
in Part 1 are true. Slides 17 & 18 are a tongue-in-cheek review of each of the
statements. Slides 19-28 and their accompanying notes explain in more detail
how this works, i.e., why the statements are true. Slides 20-26 contain USGS
earthquake data, selected from an average month with no major
newsmaker quakes. As you progress through these slides, make sure to relate
their information to the statements in Part 1 of the quiz.
For Slide 20, ask the students about the distribution of quakes shown on the
map. They should note that most of the quakes are concentrated in certain
zones, and that these zones mark plate boundaries. Have students review the
types of boundaries and how/why quakes happen at these boundaries.
Depending on prior topics covered in class, you may wish to ask them to
indicate locations on the map that are examples of each of the three major types
of plate boundaries.
Slides 22-24 present the specific data for the earthquakes shown graphically on
the map in Slide 21.
For Slide 25, ask students why so many of the quakes are concentrated in
California & Alaska. Also note the 2 quakes in the New Madrid area, and
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
either point out the relationship to the 1811-1812 New Madrid activity, or if
you have previously discussed the New Madrid quakes of 1811-12 in class, ask
the students why there is quake activity in the middle of the continent.
Slides 27 & 28 demonstrate that even in Virginia, which is not seismically very
active, one could still predict earthquake activity relatively well just by
guessing, because the patterns of quake activity provide fairly good probability
of coincidence.
Slide 29 makes the important point that all three pieces of information time,
location, and size of earthquake are necessary for true prediction and that
each of the statements in Part 1 of the quiz is missing at least one of these three
pieces.
4. ACTIVITY: Quake Quiz Part 2 and Discussion
After displaying Slide 30, have students complete Part 2 of the Quake Quiz (on
the back of the sheet). When they have finished Part 2, show Slides 31 & 32,
reading each bulleted statement aloud as it is displayed on the screen and
discussing additional information contained in the PowerPoint notes.
5. Modern Research: Forecasting and Preparedness
Slide 33 lists some quake precursors, with detailed explanation in the notes for
the slide. However, these precursors have usually been recognized after a
quake has happened, and their patterns vary considerably, depending on
specific site conditions. Slide 34 points out that it is highly unlikely that
scientists will ever be able to truly predict earthquakes, i.e., exact time PLUS
location PLUS size, and that it makes more sense to spend time and money on
advanced monitoring & data collection, improved modelling, engineering &
planning techniques and approaches (such as quake-resistant construction) for
earthquake prone areas, public education, and various earthquake preparedness
measures. Slides 35-40 illustrate some examples of these efforts.
The first animation in Slide 35 illustrates the use of INSAR technology for
detecting extremely slight ground bulges associated with stress buildup prior to
earthquakes. The second animation is a simulation, from INSAR and a great
variety of other earthquake data, of this characteristic type of ground bulging,
as reconstructed for 1000 years of earthquake history on the San Andreas Fault.
Have the students observe how there are certain repetitions of locations and
sizes of quakes almost in a pattern but the pattern then gets disrupted this
observation will be an important basis for later discussion of chaos. Have them
also note places where there is constant flickering of very small bulges in
areas like Hollister CA (NW-central part of the fault), where the fault is
constantly moving and releasing stress in frequent small quakes.
Slide 36 is an example of how the approach illustrated in the animations was
combined with probability analyses to forecast increased likelihood of quakes
by decade in areas of California affected by faults and earthquake activity.
Although the method did not predict exact place, time, and size of any quakes,
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
Also prior to showing the animation, on the photo at right, point out the timer
and the color code for shaking intensity (Mercalli Scale numbers), and tell
students to observe these during the animation how intense is the shaking in
Long Beach, and how much time is required for shaking to travel from the
epicenter to Long Beach would people have much time to evacuate?
Then click the center of the aerial view of Long Beach to open and play the
simulation.
6. Modelling Earthquake Activity: Chaos Theory & Cellular Automata
Slide 41 reviews two important concepts related to earthquakes. Have students
recall the colorful 1000 year animation of the San Andreas and the way the
quakes exhibited certain patterns, but that the patterns were not repeated
exactly and identically.
1) The overall general patterns result from the continuous
movement along the fault, which is a major plate boundary (strike-slip,
or transform). However, minor variations in local geology will result in
slightly different responses to stress buildup in the rocks along the fault
and different rock behavior. If time and lesson pacing permit, use the
wood blocks, wooden & plastic rulers, and Silly Putty, as described in
the notes for the slide, to demonstrate these different responses and how
they would result in different sizes and motions of their associated
earthquakes. These local differences in rock behavior are the reason
why the patterns of quake activity do not repeat exactly.
2) Scientists are using a fascinating new field of mathematics called
chaos theory to help understand earthquakes and several other complex
natural phenomena that are impossible to precisely predict for
instance long term climate patterns, also the paths of hurricanes. The
major concept behind chaos theory is that although many natural
phenomena follow certain general patterns (e.g., quakes on the San
Andreas Fault) , a very small change in initial conditions (different local
rock and geologic factors) can cause large deviations in the final
outcome (the resulting quakes dont repeat patterns exactly).
Slide 42 illustrates that hurricanes are another example of a natural
phenomenon exhibiting chaos, or chaotic behavior.
Slide 43 discusses self-organized criticality, the type of behavior on earthquake
faults that is associated with the use of chaos theory in quake forecasting. Slide
44 provides an excellent non-nature example of self-organized criticality.
So how do scientists use chaos and self-organized criticality to model
earthquake activity? One way is to construct physical models such as that
illustrated in Slide 45.
However, advances in personal computer technology have facilitated
development of much more powerful a mathematical and computer modeling
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
Slide 66 illustrates the case where a bingo square accumulates more than 4
tick marks worth of stress.
When you reach Slide 67, instruct the students to begin the exercise and assist
them as they work. Have them generate BingoQuakes for 15-20 minutes and
then answer the first 2 questions on the student worksheet.
Slide 68 So What Now? Using the students results and the Answer Key for
the BingoQuakes exercise, discuss the results of the BingoQuakes activity and
specifically Questions 1 & 2 on the student worksheet.
8.. Closure
Slide 69 So What Now? The Final Question. Discuss the question asked at
the end of the student worksheet: How is the Bingo Box doing as a model for
earthquakes?
Practice
Extensions
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
http://www.mathinscience.info/public/population_pattern/pop_pattern_lesson.htm
For students interested in further applications of cellular automata in the natural
sciences, several activities in this lesson from the MathScience Innovation Center
use cellular automata to model the forest growth and forest fires.
Assessment
PaperPencil
Quiz
4,7,9
Teaching Tips
Product/
Performance
1,3,8, 10
4,7
4,7
2,5,6
Student
Project and
Rubric
1. Media players and Internet access. (QuickTime, Flash, and Real players
are needed to display videos & animations in this presentation; Internet
connection is needed for the hyperlinks in Slides 47 and 50.)
2. Check hyperlinks
Check PowerPoint hyperlinks to videos and animations, and re-link them if
necessary.
3. Quake Quiz
Parts 1 & 2 of the Quake Quiz may be printed as a double-sided sheet or as 2
sheets stapled together. Students should complete the separate parts in the
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info
Earthquake Forecasting
http://mathinscience.info