Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21
Century Learning
Flow
Engaged Learners
Motivation
Curiosity
Interest
Deep
Learning
ORGANIZATION
NOVELTY/ VARIETY
CHOICE
LEARNING
ENVIRONMENTSAFFILIATION
AFFIRMATION
THAT ENGAGE:
Web 2.0
PRODUCT STANDARDS
AUTHENTICITY
PRODUCT FOCUS
INTELLECTUAL SAFETY
*Based in part on the work of Philip Schlechty (2001) and Jennifer Fredricks (2004)
Technological
Innovations
Research on
How People
Learn
21st Century
Learning/
Learner
21st Century
Skills
Technological
Innovations
Democratization
Digital Tools
Research on
How People
Learn
21st Century
Learning/
Learner
Authenticity
21st Century
Critical Thinking
Skills
Collaboration
Democratization of Knowledge
Digital Innovation
Digital Resources
www.ted.com/speakers/david_bolinsky.html
Animation of a Cell.
Harvard Biovisions
Slide 40
Digital Animation
http://www.hippocampus.org/
http://www.hippocampus.org/
SimCalc
http://www.simcalc.umassd.edu/
SimCalc
http://www.simcalc.umassd.edu/software/
Questions
Will our schools be sufficiently adept and
visionary to embrace this democratization?
More complex
Thinking Critically
1.What
is the
Goal?
Dispositions
2. What is
Known?
Challenges
No
4. Have You
Reached
Your Goal?
Yes
Success
Reflection
3. Which Thinking
Skills Will Get You
To Your Goal?
Deductive
Reasoning
Argument Analysis
Hypothesis Testing
Uses of Probability
Decision Making
Problem Solving
Creative Thinking
A Culture of Thinking
Model Explain Interact Provide feedback
S. Tishman, et al.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Language of thinking
Thinking dispositions
Thinking strategies
Self-direction
Higher order
knowledge/Transfer
Amelia Earhart
What do
you think
happened?
What are
your ideas?
LANGUAGE OF THINKING
Guess
Hypothesize
Conclude
_________
Confirm
Criticize
Comprehend
__________
Demonstrate
Opinion
__________
__________
Question
Imply
Analyze
Interpret
___________
___________
International Newspapers
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Authorship
Format
Audience
Content
Purpose
GapMinder
Intrique engagement
Mass Collaboration
Crowd sourcing
Acquisition
(the Individual)
Participation
(the group, community,
network, culture)
Knowledge
Creation
(the innovative
knowledge community)
Kai Hakkarainen, et al
Communities of Practice
Collaboration
TRUMPS
Competition
TRUMPS
Individual learning
Collaboration in Learning
1. Balance of formal and informal
2. Positive interdependence which promotes
personal responsibility
3. Considerable promotive interaction
4. Shared workspace
5. Iterative group reflection and processing to
improve effectiveness
Sustained Discussion?
S
S
S
Teacher
S
S
S
Teacher
S
S
Sustained Discussion
Interesting Query
Interesting Results
Voice Thread
Student Honesty
Wikis in Education
Interactive Gaming
Stem Cell Research
School Prayer
Health Care
Death Penalty
Design Principles
Personalization
Adult world connection
Common intellectual mission
Technological
Innovations
Research on
How People
Learn
21st Century
Learning/
Learner
21st Century
Skills
Technological
Innovations
Infrastructure
Research on
How People
Learn
21st Century
Learning/
Learner
Principles
Technology Tools
Web 2.0/Digital Platform
21st Century
Skills
New Skills
Habits of Mind
2 3
Todays
Status
Research
Tomorrows
Vision
2 3
Todays
Status
Research
Tomorrows
Vision
2 3
Todays
Status
Research
What system
changes/capacity building
will ensure success?
Educator
Effectiveness
Professional
Learning
Tomorrows
Vision
Metrics
Access &
Infrastructure
Culture of
Innovation
6 1
Summative
assessment
??
Formative
assessment
2 3
Todays
Status
Research
What system
changes/capacity building
will ensure success?
Educator
Proficiency
Professional
Learning
Tomorrows
Vision
Metrics
Access &
Infrastructure
Culture of
Innovation
6 1
Summative
assessment
??
Formative
assessment
Research to Practice
Envision/study 21st Century Learning
Develop common vision and principles
Identify and celebrate successes
Add new dimensions to existing lessons/units
Develop or identify new units
- Perfection
Sustainability - Robust Design - Mutation
Spread - Reduction in Resource Load - Optimality
Shift - Move beyond brand - Origination
Evolution - Learn from Adapters - Unlearning
Depth - Evaluation/Research
- Perfection
Sustainability - Robust Design - Mutation
Spread - Reduction in Resource Load - Optimality
Shift - Move beyond brand - Origination
Evolution - Learn from Adapters - Unlearning
Depth - Evaluation/Research
Principle:
Personalization
The it:
Personal Device
2 3
Todays
Status
Research
What system
changes/capacity building
will ensure success?
Educator
Proficiency
Professional
Learning
Tomorrows
Vision
Metrics
Access &
Infrastructure
Culture of
Innovation
6 1
Summative
assessment
??
Formative
assessment
Dimensions21
AUDIT SYSTEM
FRAMEWORK
The Classroom, School & District Indicators
A Forward-Thinking, Shared Vision
Systems Thinking
Student
Surveys
ANALYSIS,
INSIGHTS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
Student Engagement
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
DEFIANT WITHDRAWN COMPLIANT TACTICAL INTRINSIC
COGNITIVE
Students investment in the effort required to
comprehend complex ideas and master
difficult skills.
SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL
Students reactions, interactions, and
interdependencies/ties with classmates,
academics, teachers, and school.
BEHAVIORAL
Students participation with classmates, academics,
teachers, school and after-school activities.
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
DEFIANT WITHDRAWN COMPLIANT TACTICAL INTRINSIC
Baseline 2007-08
100%
Spring 2008
80%
65
60%
49
40%
35
20
20%
6
0%
Engaged
Tactically
engaged
Compliant
Withdrawn
Defiant
Indeterminate
Interpreting Data
Flow
Engaged Learners
Motivation
Curiosity
Interest
Deep
Learning
ORGANIZATION
NOVELTY/ VARIETY
CHOICE
LEARNING
ENVIRONMENTSAFFILIATION
AFFIRMATION
THAT ENGAGE:
Web 2.0
PRODUCT STANDARDS
AUTHENTICITY
PRODUCT FOCUS
INTELLECTUAL SAFETY
*Based in part on the work of Philip Schlechty (2001) and Jennifer Fredricks (2004)
www.metiri.com
THEN
NOW
Managers
Leaders
Follow rules
Compete
Team/Collaborate
Communicate F2F,
mostly with text
Degree = career
Degree = interview