Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A skyscraper is a tall, continuously habitable building of many floors, usually designed for office,
commercial and residential use. There is no official definition or height above which a building
may be classified as a skyscraper and at which height it may not be considered a high-rise
anymore. For buildings above a height of 300 m (984 ft), the term Super tall can be used;
skyscrapers reaching beyond 600 m (1,969 ft) are classified as Mega tall.
A relatively small building may be considered a skyscraper if it protrudes well above its built
environment and changes the overall skyline. The maximum height of structures has progressed
historically with building methods and technologies and thus what is today considered a
skyscraper is taller than before.
High-rise buildings are considered shorter than skyscrapers. There is no clear definition of any
difference between a tower block and a skyscraper though a building lower than about thirty
stories is not likely to be a skyscraper and a building with fifty or more stories is certainly a
skyscraper.
The term "skyscraper" was first applied to buildings of steel framed construction of at least 10
stories in the late 19th century, a result of public amazement at the tall buildings being built in
major cities like Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, Detroit, and St. Louis. The structural
definition of the word skyscraper was refined later by architectural historians, based on
engineering developments of the 1880s that had enabled construction of tall multi-story
buildings. This definition was based on the steel skeletonas opposed to constructions of loadbearing masonry, which passed their practical limit in 1891 with Chicago's Monadnock Building.
The Emporis Standards Committee defines a high-rise building as "a multi-story structure between
35100 meters tall, or a building of unknown height from 1239 floors and a skyscraper as "a
multi-story building whose architectural height is at least 100 m or 330 ft." Some structural
engineers define a highrise as any vertical construction for which wind is a more significant load
factor than earthquake or weight. Note that this criterion fits not only high-rises but some other
tall structures, such as towers.
The word skyscraper often carries a connotation of pride and achievement. The skyscraper, in
name and social function, is a modern expression of the age-old symbol of the world center or
axis mundi: a pillar that connects earth to heaven and the four compass directions to one
another.
A loose convention of some in the United States and Europe draws the lower limit of a skyscraper
at 150 m or 490 ft.
How is the height of a building determined?
The original design height of One World Trade Center (Freedom Tower) was a symbolic 1776
feet. David Childs' redesign of 1WTC accomplished this height with a spire and not with
occupied space. Does the spire count? How is height measured? The Council on Tall Buildings
and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) defines height in three ways:
Architectural Top: Includes permanent spires, but not functional or technical equipment, such as
antennae, signs, flag poles, or radio towers that can be removed or replaced
Highest Occupied Floor: Height to the top space used by occupants, other than areas for
servicing mechanical equipment
Highest Point of the Building: Height to the tip of the top, no matter what it is. However, the
structure has to be a building. A tall building must have at least 50% of its height occupied as
usable, habitable space. Otherwise, the tall structure may be considered a tower for
observation or telecommunications.
When ranking the height of skyscrapers, CTBUH considers architectural height and measures a
building's height from "the lowest, significant, open-air, pedestrian entrance." Other people or
organizations may argue that buildings are to be used by people and should be ranked by the
highest Occupied Space. Still others may say that height is simply from the bottom to the top
but then do you exclude underground floors?
Tall, Super tall, and Mega tall
The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) has established definitions that can be
used as a starting point for discussing skyscrapers:
Tall: "a building of perhaps 14 or more stories or over 50 meters (165 feet)"
Super tall: a building over 984 feet (300 meters)
Mega tall: a building over 1,968 feet (600 meters)
Contributing Factors
Contributing Persons
William Kelly, had held a patent for "a system of air blowing the carbon
out of pig iron" another method of steel production. Bankruptcy forced
Kelly to sell his patent to Henry Bessemer, who had been working on a
similar process for making steel.
The Flatiron Building was one of New York City's first skyscrapers
(Broadway and 23rd), built in 1902 by Fuller's building company. Daniel H.
Burnham was the chief architect.
The world's tallest building when it opened in 1913, architect Cass Gilbert's 793-foot Woolworth
Building was considered a leading example of tall building design.
Another signature element of Sullivan's work is the massive, semi-circular arch. Sullivan employed
such arches throughout his careerin shaping entrances, in framing windows, or as interior
design.
All of these elements can be found in Sullivan's widely-admired Guaranty Building, which he
designed while partnered with Adler. Completed in 1895, this office building in Buffalo, New York
is in the Palazzo style, visibly divided into three "zones" of design: a plain, wide-windowed base
for the ground-level shops; the main office block, with vertical ribbons of masonry rising
unimpeded across nine upper floors to emphasize the building's height; and an ornamented
cornice perforated by round windows at the roof level, where the building's mechanical units
(like the elevator motors) were housed. The cornice crawls with Sullivan's trademark Art Nouveau
vines; each ground-floor entrance is topped by a semi-circular arch.
The American Surety Building, designed by Bruce Price and completed in 1896, gave New York
the title of tallest building for many years.
The ideas of structural engineer Fazlur Khan were also influential in this movement, in particular
his introduction of a new structural system of framed tubes in skyscraper design and
construction. The first building to apply the tube-frame construction was the DeWitt-Chestnut
Apartment Building which Khan designed and was completed in Chicago by 1966.
partitions. In the years from 1889 to 1891, he displayed his system in the construction of the
Second Leiter Building, also in Chicago.
According to popular story, one day he came
home early and surprised his wife who was
reading. She put her book down on top of a bird
cage and ran to meet him. He strode across the
room, lifted the book and dropped it back on
the bird cage two or three times. Then, he
exclaimed: "It works! It works! Dont you see? If
this little cage can hold this heavy book, why
cant an iron or steel cage be the framework for
a whole building?" Jenney applied his new idea
to the construction of the Home Insurance
Building, the first skyscraper in the world, which
was erected in 1884 at the corner of LaSalle and
Monroe Streets in Chicago. The Home Insurance
Building was the first example of a steel skeleton building, the first grid of iron columns, girders,
beams and floor joists ever constructed.
Evolution of Skyscraper
Montgomery Schuyler (1899)
the eminent critic of the Architectural Record, wrote an article on the subject of progressive
American Architecture called "The Skyscraper Up-to-Date," in which he lamented that the
element of experiment seemed to have disappeared from the design of the skyscraper.
He recalled the early days, especially in the first half of the 1880s, when much "wild work" was
done. But now, he said, architects seemed to have settled down to a tripartite formula involving
a base, shaft, and capital composed of certain groupings of stories. This formula, he went on to
say, may be clothed in a variety of historic styles.
in Scribner's Magazine, Schuyler reported again on "The Evolution of the Skyscraper"
In the article, Schuyler explained the advances in technology that made possible the rapid rise
of building heights. These included the elevator, cage and skeleton construction, fireproof
protection for columns and beams, isolated footings and caisson foundations, and the rest.
He further suggested that these changes of shape resulted from the increasing size and height
of the skyscraper and were made possible by technological advances under the pressure of a
strong surge for profits. He made it clear that change in form was not basically a matter of style.
Once the frame was formulated, the exterior details could be borrowed from Romanesque or
Baroque architecture, or neoclassical architecture, or any one of a number of other historical
styles.
While recognizing the impact of technology and the presence of revival styles, Schuyler was
aware of an underlying set of conditions that produced a sequence of solutions.
The first he identified with the "wild work" being done in the 1880s.
The second was a tripartite pattern beginning about 1890.
The third, in the form of a tower, evolved largely in the pre-World War I period.
Schuyler seemed aware that the size and height of buildings and their relationship to urban
requirements would of necessity produce a new form or forms that could be viewed historically
as distinct phases.
View of skyscraper divided into seven chapters or phases.
Phase 1
A pre-skyscraper phase, dated roughly between 1849 and 1870, composed of buildings
containing the essential elements of the skyscraper but not as yet assembled into a single
structure.
Phase 2
Starting with the Equitable Life Assurance Building, of 1868-70, which contains the necessary
ingredients for the early skyscraper but where the compositional features of Phase 1 still persist.
Phase 3
Beginning about 1878, when the French mansardic mode gives way to a flat-roofed formula
involving a free and varied grouping of stories producing, in Schuyler's words, much "wild work."
Phase 4
Starting in the late 1880s and characterized by a tripartite system of composition corresponding
to the parts of a classic column with its base, shaft, and capital.
Phase 5
Dealing with the skyscraper in tower form. In this category three variants are recognized: the
"isolated" tower, conceived as early as 1888 but not realized until 1894-95; a "mounted" tower,
dating about 1911, as exemplified by the Woolworth Building; and a "set-back" tower, resulting
from the rights provided by the revision of the zoning codes from 1916 onward.
Phase 6
Associated with the "setback" form of skyscraper, dictated by the zoning-code revisions effective
after 1916.
Phase 7
Dating from 1930 and represented by Rockefeller Center, features a solution with limited space
development, park-like setting, and often of multiblock dimensions.
Haughwout Store and Elevator (NYC) (1857) by John P. Gaynor, Elisha Otis.
Phase 2
Equitable Life Assurance Building (NYC) (1868-70) by Gilman & Kendall.
Western Union Building (NYC) (1873-5) by George B. Post.
Tribune Building (NYC) (1873-5) by Richard Morris Hunt.
Evening Post Building (NYC) (1854) by Charles F. Mengelson.
Phase 3
Mills Building (NYC) (1881-3) by George B. Post.
Produce Exchange (NYC) (1881-4) by George B. Post.
Home Life Insurance Building (Chicago) (1884-5) by William Le Baron Jenney.
Rookery (Chicago) (1885-6) by Burnham & Root.
Tacoma Building (Chicago) (1889) by Holabird & Roche.
Marshall Field Warehouse (Chicago) (1885-7) by H. H. Richardson.
Chamber of Commerce Building (Chicago) (1888-9) by Baumann & Huehl.
Phase 4
Union Trust Building (NYC) (1897) George B. Post.
Wainwright Building (St. Louis) (1892-3) Adler & Sullivan.
Havemeyer Building (NYC) (1891-2) George B. Post.
Washington Life Building (NYC) (1897) by Cyrus L. W. Eidlitz.
Broadway-Chambers Building (NYC) (1899-1900) by Cass Gilbert.
Flat-iron Building (NYC) (1902) by Daniel H. Burnham & Company.
Phase 5
Guaranty Building (Buffalo) (1894) by Adler & Sullivan.
American Surety Building (NYC) (1894-96) Bruce Price.
Singer Building (NYC) (1906-8) Ernest Flagg.
Metropolitan Tower (NYC) (1909) Napoleon Le Brun & Sons.
Woolworth Building (NYC) (1911-13) Cass Gilbert.
Empire State Building (NYC) (1929-31) Shreve, Lamb & Harmon.
CBS Building (NYC) (1965) Eero Saarinen & Associates.
Phase 6
Daily News Building (NYC) (1929) Howells & Hood.
Indemnity Building (NYC) Buchman & Kahn.
Chanin Building (NYC) (1929) Sloan & Robertson.
Lincoln Building (NYC) (1930) J. E. Carpenter & Associates.
Phase 7
Rockefeller Center (NYC) (1930-40) Hofmeister, Hood, Godley & Fouilhoux.
World Trade Center (NYC) (1969-70) Yamasaki & Assoc; Emery Roth & Sons.
Embarcadero Center (San Francisco) (1971-89) John Portman & Associates.
Lever House (NYC) (1952) Skidmore, Owings & Merrill.
Seagram Building (NYC) (1954-58) Van der Rohe and Philip Johnson.
Tripartite Pattern
The tripartite division associated with the classic column, which Schuyler noted in 1899. This can
be considered Phase 4. As stated earlier, Schuyler felt that an early example of this formula was
George B. Post's Union Trust Building.
The facade not only has the base, shaft, and capital but also a transitional story between the
base and the shaft and a similar one between the shaft and the capital. An equally early
instance is George H. Edbrooke's Hammond Building, Detroit's first skyscraper, which features the
three-part system.
A more successful solution, because of its height, can be seen in the Havemeyer Building.
Here, the shaft is given greater emphasis by being seven stories tall rather than five. The base is
three stories, as is the capital, while the transitional stories are one each.
Substantially the same method was employed in Robert Maynicke's building at 715-727
Broadway. The two-story base carries the transitional story leading to a six-story shaft surmounted
by another transitional story with heavy cornice and topped by a two-story capital. The
difference between this solution and that of the Havemeyer Building is that in the former, the
shaft is composed of a colonnade instead of an arcade.
A Chicago version of the Phase 4 formula without the upper transitional story is to be seen in a
building for the New York Life Insurance Company. A St. Louis variant is the Union Trust Company
Building, where the arcade is used in the shaft and where there are no transitional stories, merely
a base and capital elegantly articulated.
Into this category one should also put Adler & Sullivan's Wainwright Building. In his book on Louis
Sullivan (1856-1924), Hugh Morrison says that Sullivan's composition was dictated by function and
the desire to achieve a "soaring" effect in a building of such height.
Apparently, the tripartite concept played little or no part in determining the design of the
elevation. A rental plan of the Wainwright Building discovered recently in the St. Louis Free
Library shows, however, that the second floor was identical with the floors above, excepting the
top story, so that the heavy molding that appears to separate the second story from the third
was introduced not for a functional but an aesthetic purpose. The ten-story facade obviously
looked better with a two-story base, a seven-story shaft, and a taller-than-average capital
housing various services.
The tripartite pattern is repeated in the Schiller Building, where there is little indication on the
facade that the structure houses a theatre. It occurs in the Marquette Building, which has a twostory base, a transitional story, an eleven-story shaft, and a one-story transition and capital.
A final aspect of the tripartite phase needs noting. This is well illustrated by the American Surety
Building. Here we have a three-story base with Ionic order and a caryatid story, an eleven-story
shaft, and then an extremely elaborate and tall capital.
Just when this practice began it is difficult to say. But it appears to have been popular in the
late 1890s and was used well into the twentieth century. A good example, with highly decorated
base, capital, and transitional stories, is the Washington Life Building, where the simple eight-story
shaft offers an effective foil for the ornament above and below.
At the very end of the nineteenth century, Cass Gilbert designed the Broadway-Chambers
Building, which offers one of the best examples of this shaft treatment of the tripartite formula.
Not only do we have a decorous capital with base and transitional stories but the three essential
parts are distinguished by a difference in material and colour. The shaft is dark-brown brick, the
capital a warm marble, and the base a gray granite. When Daniel H. Burnham & Company was
commissioned to do the Flatiron Building in New York between 1901-3, the firm's design proved
that the tripartite arrangement was still fashionable. It was without question the most widely used
solution for the design of a skyscraper in the United States at that time, being practiced in all
regions of the country.
Tower Designs
The concept of a tower had been associated with the skyscraper. We have seen it used by
Hunt in the Tribune Building. Earlier, in pre-skyscraper days, William L. Johnston (181149) had
used a two-story Gothic version in the Jayne Building. In both examples, the towers were mere
appendages, essentially expressive symbols. Height had an economic value, and a tower atop
a business building was the cheapest way to achieve it.
When Bradford Gilbert (1853-1911) was commissioned to do an office structure in 1887 for a
narrow site at 50 Broadway, he was successful in having the building code revised to permit the
use of skeleton construction. The 21-foot-6-inch-wide facade was designed as a Romanesque
tower, and it was thought appropriate to call it the Tower Building. But, in fact, it was not a
tower. The structure was about 108 feet deep and when seen from the side its form was actually
slab-like.
Philadelphia had an earlier version of this form in the Tower Building by Samuel Sloan (1815-84)
of 1855. Thus, it appears that a reference to towers had an appeal that was aesthetic and
expressive. How widespread was its use may be realized by its employment in religious, civic,
domestic, and exhibition architecture, railway stations, and the like. Its appearance, in
commercial buildings, is, therefore, to be expected.
It is thought that the first free-standing tower to be erected was the American Surety Building by
Bruce Price, because the architect expressed his preoccupation with the tower concept
verbally.
Composition of Facade: Windows, Stories
Most characteristic, however, is the method of grouping the stories as a means of achieving a
sense of order in a facade involving so many windows, piers, spandrels, mullions, and so on.
In the Boreel Building, of 1878-79, Stephen Hatch follows Mengelson's lead in dividing his
elevation vertically and horizontally. The piers create a composition of five bays with the
windows arranged in a 3-2-2-2-3 pattern, while broad-banded moldings and cornice group the
stories in a 2-3-3-1 scheme. As in the Evening Post, decoration is minimized, with a central accent
provided by a two-story entrance and a Queen Anne pediment over the attic story.
The ten-story Morse Building is a variation on this theme. The roof-line is fiat. The piers make for a
three-bay, 4-2-4 solution. And the stories are grouped 2-1-2-1-2-1 by double-string courses
running past the piers. The tenth story is in the form of a corbeled arcade topped off by a
modest cornice.
The Mills Building is larger in size but follows the same principle of design. Here, two wings flank a
central entrance and light court. These are subdivided on the Broad Street facade into four bays
each, two windows wide. The horizontal division is 1-1-2-3-2-1. Of interest is an earlier solution of
1880, which presented an unbroken facade of eight bays, each three windows wide, with the
stories grouped in a 1-1-3-1-1-2 pattern. The terminating stories are in the form of a mansard with
colossal dormers. The formula shown in the rendering reflects the transition from Phase 2 to Phase
3, with a flat-roofed scheme replacing the mansard.
The Produce Exchange introduces the other way of achieving unity during this time. In this
instance, horizontal grouping is 1-4-2-1-1. But the four-story arcade, the two-story arcade above
it, and a single floor below the cornice and the attic story are arranged in a vertical geometric
progression of 1-2-4 windows. The architect must have felt the need of a solution of this sort to
attain a sense of order in a structure of so many parts and of such massive size. By employing this
progression, he managed to avoid monotony and to relate the elements in a most agreeable
way.
In the Auditorium building, Sullivan again makes use of this solution in the upper seven floors but
varies the vertical composition to a 4-2-1 and the horizontal into a 1-2-3 progression.
The more typical design system, however, during this period was the one described earlier,
namely, an arbitrary and seemingly capricious grouping of stories designed to produce the most
attractive composition. The Rookery by Burnham & Root uses a 1-2-3-3-1 pattern. Cobb & Frost in
the Chicago Opera House prefer a 2-2-4-2. Baumann & Huehl employ a 2-3-3-4-1 formula in the
Chamber of Commerce Building, and Shepley, Rutan & Coolidge favour a 1-2-5-3-1-1 for the
Ames Building, of 1889-91, in Boston.
Zoning Codes: Revision of the N.Y. Building Code (1916)
It is necessary to note one other factor that played a part in producing the tower-with-base
formula. This was the revision of the N.Y. building code in 1916.
Brought on by the ill effects these gigantic buildings were having on the city and the public, the
code introduced a zoning ordinance that necessitated a set-back system based on the width of
the street.
Most dramatic examples are the Art Deco skyscrapers the Chrysler Building by William Van Alen
(1883-1954), of 1929-32, that rose 67 stories and 808 feet, and the Empire State Building by
Shreve, Lamb & Harmon, of 1930-31, which tops all others at 102 stories and 1,250 feet.
The introduction of zoning codes in New York and other cities produced a new form of
skyscraper, constituting Phase 6. The period began in 1916 and continues to the present, though
its heyday was in the 1920s, between the end of World War I and the depression of 1929.
Multi-Block Sites
Current examples of the multiblock formula include the pre-9/11 World Trade Center in New
York by Yamasaki & Associates and Emery Roth & Sons, with its two gigantic towers placed in an
open plaza and surrounded by far smaller structures. Another is John Portman & Associates'
Embarcadero Center in San Francisco, which is composed of a series of thin slab towers of
various heights, set in an irregularly shaped green belt studded with low units.
Less spectacular, but a part of Phase 7, is the kind of solution, represented by Lever House,
where a more limited site is involved, often of block size or less.
This category would include the Seagram Building, of 1956-57, by Mies van der Rohe and Philip
Johnson (1906-2005), with plaza and reflecting pools.
It would also include Pittsburgh's U.S. Steel Corporation Building, of 1967, by Harrison,
Abramovitz & Abbe, which features a triangular tower on stilts set on a terrace flanked by shrubs
and a pool, and Skidmore, Owings & Merrill's Hartford Plaza, completed in 1967 in San Francisco.
Period 1850-1970
Advances in technology can, in large part, explain the growing height of the skyscraper up to
about 1900, when the skeleton frame was widely accepted, but it cannot account for the
dramatic changes that took place afterwards.
New construction methods, such as bolted, riveted, then welded frames had virtually no effect
on skyscraper appearance. Faster, smoother, and, finally, automatic elevators improved service
but did not influence form.
The electric light, better plumbing, more dependable heating systems and the telephone
made life more comfortable and business easier to conduct, but these had virtually no effect on
the shape of the structure.
Mid/Late 20th Century Skyscrapers
If the First Chicago School is associated with the earliest types of skyscraper towers, the
Second Chicago School of architecture is closely linked to the minimalist International Style,
championed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe.
Chicago-born firms like Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, and C.F.Murphy & Associates, later 20th
century architects have adopted a series of new construction techniques for supertall buildings.
Although non-load-bearing curtain walls are used in all skyscraper towers, tubular designs have
been introduced for the supporting steel frame, in order to reduce the amount of steel used. The
108-story Willis Tower (1970-4), for instance, uses one third less steel than the 102-story Empire
state building. Tube-frame structures were first used by Fazlur Khan (1929-82), a partner in
Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, in the building of the DeWitt-Chestnut Apartment Building,
Chicago (1963).
Thereafter it was employed for the 100-story John Hancock Center and the World Trade
Center. Variants of the tube frame include the "framed tube", "trussed tube" and "bundled tube"
systems. The bundled tube system, for instance, in which a number of interconnected tube
frames are used, was used in the Willis Tower in Chicago (still commonly referred to as the Sears
Tower) used this design. The bundle tube design also permitted a more flexible formulation of
architectural space.
Skyscraper towers were no longer obliged to be box-like; the tube-units could form different
shapes. The trussed tube system was employed by Khan in the Onterie Center, Chicago (1986).
For more about contemporary trends,Postmodernist Art (1970 onwards).
ADVENT OF SKYSCAPER IN 19TH CENTURY
In the 19th Century, a new kind of structure was developed, using an iron or steel internal
structure (instead of the outer walls) to bear the building's weight. The taller of these buildings
are called skyscrapers.
Skyscrapers have always represented the rising industrial age of American society in the
1900s, and when people think of the skyscraper they imaging massive, fifty stories plus, high-rise
structures. However, the term skyscraper was first applied to the first ten to twenty story buildings
that began to rise in New York in the 1880s. While in contemporary culture these building may
not compete with the high-rising giants that line the skyline of New York and Chicago, during the
time they were built very few building could go up beyond 8 stories without facing serious
structural issues.
The skyscrapers themselves served two major historical functions: they were a symbol for
Americas rising social, global, and industrial power and they solved geographical and social
issues that were rising in the early 1900s. In the late 1800s and early 1900s America was rising as
one of the major world powers in the world. Socially and economically they were becoming
world leaders, and in the area of technology they were leading the world with new
advancements. The skyscraper was a monumental symbol of Americas technological triumphs,
as the system of supports that skyscrapers are based off of was developed in America, and in
New York the major international gate of America during this time skyscrapers were heavily
ornamented with this in mind. The skyscraper served in all respects as massive monumental
symbols to Americas rising power and glory in the world. However, skyscrapers also served a
practical purpose as they solved the issues of over population in major metropolitan areas and
the issue of the vulnerability to the elements that prior building had.
SKYSCRAPERS IN NEW YORK AND CHICAGO
Since the early days of the skyscrapers invention, New York and Chicago have been two
of the worlds premier skyscraper cities.
With the rise in American success the issue of overpopulation began to develop,
particularly in cities like New York and Chicago that were major hubs in America at the time.
With the advent of the skyscraper, however, this problem became controllable as city designers
could now develop buildings that could hold hundreds of office spaces and apartments all in a
compact area, thus conserving and utilizing as much space as possible. Moreover, skyscrapers
could be built far sturdier and more resilient than previous building, as their materials and
structural design could withstand the destructive effects of the elements, and after the Chicago
fire of 1871 this attribute became a major focal point.
Cities in the United States were traditionally made up of low-rise buildings, but significant
economic growth after the Civil War and increasingly intensive use of urban land encouraged
the development of taller buildings beginning in the 1870s. Technological improvements
enabled the construction of fireproofed iron-framed structures with deep foundations, equipped
with new inventions such as the elevator and electric lighting. These made it both technically
and commercially viable to build a new class of taller buildings, the first of which, Chicago's 138foot (42 m) tall, Home Insurance Building, opened in 1884. Their numbers grew rapidly and by
1888 they were being labeled skyscrapers. Chicago initially led the way in skyscraper design,
with many constructed in the center of the financial district during the late 1880s and early
1890s. Sometimes termed the products of the Chicago school of architecture, these skyscrapers
attempted to balance aesthetic concerns with practical commercial design, producing large,
square palazzo-styled buildings hosting shops and restaurants on the ground level and
containing rentable offices on the upper floors. In contrast, New York's skyscrapers were
frequently narrower towers which, more eclectic in style, were often criticized for their lack of
elegance. In 1892, Chicago banned the construction of new skyscrapers taller than 150 feet
(46 m), leaving the development of taller buildings to New York.
After an early competition between Chicago and New York City for the world's tallest
building, New York took the lead by 1895 with the completion of the American Surety Building,
leaving New York with the title of the world's tallest building for many years.
Asymmetry
Pointed arches
Large pointed windows with tracery and colored glass
Built
1870
Name
Equitable Life Building
Location
New York
1884
Chicago
1890
New York
1894
New York
1895
Milwaukee
1896
New York
1899
New York
Height
40 metres
(130 ft)
42 metres
(138 ft)
94 metres
(308 ft)
100 metres
(330 ft)
108 metres
(354 ft)
103.02 metres
(338 ft)
Current Status
Destroyed by
fire in 1912
Demolished in
1931
Demolished in
1955
Demolished in
1963
Standing
119 metres
(390 ft)
Standing
Standing
BUILDING EXAMPLE
Reliance Building Chicago, USA, in 1895, (15 stories)
Lever House building, New York, 1952 (24 stories)
225 West Washington building,Chicago, 1986 (40 stories)
BUILDING EXAMPLE
Chicago Civic CenterBuilding, 1965 (UP TO 40 stories)
First Wisconsin Center Building,1974 (60 stories)
BUILDING EXAMPLE
Water Tower Place Chicago, USA,( 74 stories)
Aon Center Chicago, USA, (83 stories)
PBCom Tower
6795 Ayala Avenue corner V.A. Rufino Street, Salcedo Village,
Makati City, Philippines
Type: Office Building
Construction Started: 1998
opened: 2000
Owner: Philippine Bank of Communications
Height
Antenna spire 259 m (849.7 ft)
Roof
241 m (790.7 ft)
Technical details
Floor count
Floor area
Lifts/elevators 17
52 aboveground, 7 belowground
119,905 m2 (1,291,000 sq ft)
Developer
Structural engineer
Main contractor
Height
Roof
Technical details
Floor count
Floor area
ft)
Lifts/elevators 8
73
118,000 m2 (1,270,141.43 sq
Structural engineer
Kong)
Discovery Primea
6749 Ayala Ave, Makati, 1226 Metro Manila
Type: Residential
Construction Started: 2010
Opened: 2014
Owner: JKTC Land developer
Height
Roof
238 m
Technical details
Floor count
68
Developer
JKTC, Inc.
Height
Antenna spire 221 m (725 ft)
Roof
Top floor
Technical details
Floor count
Floor area
Lifts/elevators 10
Design and construction
Architect
R. Villarosa Architects
Developer
St. Francis Square Group of
Companies
Structural engineer
Main contractor
217 m
Technical details
Floor count
64
Architect :
Casas + Architects
Sy^2 + Associates
Substructure :
Aecom
MEPF :
GT INTERNATIONAL TOWER
6813 Ayala Avenue corner H.V. dela Costa Street,
Makati City, Philippines
Type: Office Building
Construction Started: 1999
opened: 2001
Owner: Philippine Securities Corporation
Height
Antenna spire 217.3 m (712.93 ft)
Roof
181.1 m (594.16 ft)
Technical details
Floor count
underground
47 above ground, 5
Floor area
Lifts/elevators 15
Design and construction
Architect
GF & Partners Architects, Recio
+
Casas Architects,
Gozar Planners
Phils.
Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates
(design consultant)
Developer
Structural engineer
Main contractor
Height
Antenna spire 212.88 m (698.4 ft)
Technical details
Floor count
belowground
60 aboveground, 5
Lifts/elevators 7
Design and construction
Architect
Casas
Developer
Structural engineer
Ltd.
Main contractor
EEI Corporation
Height
Roof
Technical details
Floor count
60 aboveground, 4 belowground
Developer
Corp.
Structural engineer
Petron Megaplaza
358 Senator Gil Puyat Avenue, Makati City,
Philippines
Type: Office
opened: 1998
Owner: Megaworld corporation
Height
Antenna spire 210 m (689.0 ft)
Technical details
Floor count
belowground
45 aboveground, 5
Lifts/elevators 18
Design and construction
Architect
LLP
Developer
Megaworld Corporation
Structural engineer
Inc. in
Ove Arup &
Main contractor
UnionBank Plaza
Meralco Avenue corner Onyx & Sapphire Streets,
Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Philippines
Type: Office
opened: 2004
Owner: Union Bank of the Philippines
Height
Roof
Technical details
Floor count
belowground
49 aboveground, 6
Lifts/elevators 15
Design and construction
Architect
RTKL
consultant)
Developer
Structural engineer
Origenes