Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. I NTRODUCTION
Voltage oriented control (VOC) is one of the most used
techniques for the operation and control of any equipment
connected to the grid through a DC-AC controlled converter,
such as a distributed power generation system, uninterruptible power supply or active lter. The correct value of
the fundamental-frequency positive-sequence voltage vector
of the electric grid is essential for achieving good control
performance when using VOC. This information is usually
obtained by using a phase locked loop (PLL). The PLL must
be capable of following the fundamental-frequency positivesequence voltage vector as fast as possible for eliminating the
impacts of the grid signal imperfections, even during voltage
sags or if the grid voltages are distorted and unbalanced [1][2].
The synchronous reference frame PLL (SRF-PLL) is frequently used in three-phase systems and for balanced undistorted grid conditions, good results can be reached [3]. The
SRF-PLL can also operate correctly if only high order harmonics are present in the grid voltages, by reducing its bandwidth
to attenuate these harmonics [4]. However, under unbalanced
conditions, the second harmonic content of the dq voltage
vector, caused by the negative-sequence components, makes
the reduction of the bandwidth an inefcient solution, since
the dynamics of the PLL would become very slow for such
a narrow bandwidth. A better performance under unbalanced
conditions can be achieved by separating the positive and
negative-sequence components of the voltage vector. This is
made by the double synchronous reference frame PLL (DSRFPLL) that uses a decoupling cell to isolate the positive and
1115
[s+ ] =
A1 = C1 =
A3 = C3 =
1
120
1 120
1
[M ]
1
Sa
120
Sb
1 120
1
Sc
a
S
S = 1
b
3
c
S
1
1 60
1 60
1 60
1
1 60
1 60
1 60
1
[M ]
a+
S
S+ = 1
b
3
c+
S
1
1 60
1 60
1 60
1
1 60
[s ] =
[s60 ] =
a
S
b
S
c
S
(2)
1 60
1 60
1
[M+ ]
Sa
Sb .
Sc
(3)
(4)
1
[s ] = {B1 [s] + B2 [s90 ]}
3
(5)
1
[s+ ] = {C1 [s] + C2 [s60 ] + C3 [s60 ]}
3
(6)
(1)
and
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
B2 = D2 =
1
0
0
+
S
1
1
S =
1
3
1
0
S
(7)
where
1
{D1 [s] + D2 [s90 ]} ,
3
s
a
s
b
s
c
sa60
sb60
sc60
1
0
0
0
23
3
2
0
0
1
, A2 = C2 =
1
2
1
2
, B1 = D1 =
3
2
+
, [s ] =
, [s90 ] =
1
0
0
1
2
3
2
, [s] =
0
s+
a
s+
b
s+
c
sa90
sb90
sc90
1
sa
sb
sc
, [s60 ] =
sa60
sb60
sc60
, [s90 ] =
0
1
0
1
2
1
2
1
2
23
3
2
0
0
1
,
,
sa90
sb90
sc90
.
1116
Table I
G AINS OF THE MATHEMATICAL OPERATIONS FOR THE ODD HARMONICS
Operation
1 seq+
1 seq3 seq+
3 seq5 seq+
5 seq7 seq+
7 seq9 seq+
9 seq11 seq+
11 seq13 seq+
13 seq15 seq+
15 seq-
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
-
C
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1
0
1 0
1 0
1 0
D
1 0
AB
1 0
1 0
1 0
-
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1
0
1 0
1 0
CD
1 0
sd
s
q
s+
d
s+
q
1
= C1dq
3
=
cos
sin
cos( 120 )
sin( 120 )
1
2
1
2
cos( + 120 )
sin( + 120 )
1
2
A3dq = C3dq =
[s]
(8)
where is the d axis angular position and using (4) and (8), the
negative-sequence instantaneous components in an arbitrary dq
reference frame can be calculated as follows:
1
T [s ] = {T A1 [s] + T A2 [s60 ] + T A3 [s60 ]} .
3
Thus,
[s
dq ] =
1
T A1 T 1 [sdq ] + T A2 T 1 [sdq60 ] + T A3 T 1 [sdq60 ]
3
(9)
[sdq ] =
[sdq60 ] =
sd
sq
s0
sd60
sq60
s060
sd60
sq60
+
1
D2dq
2
1
+ C3dq
6
sd90
sq90
(11)
sd60
,
sq60
(12)
(13)
1
0
3
1
1
3
0
1
3
,
1
, B2dq = D2dq =
0
1
1
0
.
(14)
sh = Sh cos(ht + h )
,
sh = Sh sin(ht + h )
, [s
dq ] =
s
d
s
q
s
0
, [sdq60 ] =
sh + jsh = Sh ej(ht+h ) .
sd60
sq60
s060
(15)
=
1
A1dq
3
sd
sq
1
+ A2dq
6
sd60
sq60
1
+ A3dq
6
(16)
sd90
sq90
where
sd
sq
A2dq = C2dq =
2
3
1
+ C2dq
6
1
D1dq
2
1
B2dq
2
[sdq ] =
sd
sq
sd
sq
1 0
1 0
s+
d
s+
q
1
B1dq
2
sd60
.
sq60
(10)
Sh
=
3
s
=
Sh
3
sin(
) 23 cos(h h120o ) 12 sin(h h120o )
h
3
2 cos(h h60o ) + 12 sin(h h60o ) ,
(17)
1117
j(ht+h )
s
+ js = Sh e
o
o
1
1 + ej(1+h)120 + ej(1+h)60 .
3
Then,
s
+ js = (sh + jsh )
o
o
1
1 + ej(1+h)120 + ej(1+h)60 ,
3
s
js = (sh jsh )
GA+
(18)
where GA+ is the gain of the operation Adq for positivesequence signals.
Considering a three-phase balanced negative-sequence signal of order h (h = 1, 2, 3, . . .), it can be shown that:
s
js
o
o
1
= (sh jsh )
1 + ej(1+h)120 + ej(1+h)60 , (19)
3
Sh
2
(20)
j(ht+h )
s
+ js = Sh e
1
1 + ej(1+h)90
2
s
+ js = (sh + jsh )
o
1
1 + ej(1+h)90 ,
2
Then,
(21)
GB +
s
js = (sh jsh )
1
1 + ej(1+h)90 ,
2
(22)
GB
s
+ js = (sh + jsh )
vabc
abc
ab
Cdq
o
o
1
1 + ej(1h)60 + ej(1h)120 , (23)
3
Ddq
GC +
Adq
dq
Bdqdq
s
js = (sh jsh )
(24)
1
1 + ej(1h)90 ,
2
(25)
GD +
o
1
1 + ej(1h)90 ,
2
(26)
GD
MDC vd
q+
V vd + vq
2
LPF
LPF
Figure 1.
GC
s
+ js = (sh + jsh )
vq
ab
GA
s
s
o
o
1
1 + ej(1h)60 + ej(1h)120 ,
3
vd
vq
1118
vq* = 0
+
vabc
dq
PI
abc
q+
w+
+
wff
1
s
=
1
A1dq
3
sDC
d
sDC
q
1
A2dq
6
sDC
d
sDC
q
1
+ A3dq
6
sDC
d
sDC
q
s
d
s
q
1
1
B1dq A3dq
2
3
1
=
6
sDC
d
sDC
q
(1 3)
(1 3)
+
1
1
B2dq A3dq
2
3
sDC
d
sDC
q
DC
(1 + 3)
sd
.
sDC
(1 3)
q
(28)
Then, the matrix [MDC ] that must multiply the signal coming
from the operation Bdq is:
1
1
6
150
(29)
(1 3)
(1 + 3)
(1 3) (1 3)
3 (1 3) (1 3)
[MDC ] =
.
(1 3)
4 (1 + 3)
[MDC ] =
(%)
abc
s
d
s
q
In order to verify the proposed algorithm effectiveness, simulations were carried out for obtaining the positive-sequence
fundamental-frequency voltages from unbalanced and distorted input signals. The fundamental-frequency of the grid is
+1
= 1 0 p.u. is the pre-fault grid
50 Hz. In all situations, vpf
voltage. In the rst case, the unbalanced and distorted grid
voltage during the fault consisted of v +1 = 0.747 14 p.u.,
v 1 = 0.163 171.37 p.u., v 5 = 0.07 60 p.u., v +7 =
0.05 30 p.u.. In the second case, v +1 = 2.5v 1 = 1 0 p.u.,
+1
v +h = v h = 0.6vh , h = 2, 3, . . . , 25. Figures 2 and 3
show the simulation results. In both gures, the rst graphic
shows the input voltages, the second graphic shows the output
voltages, the third graphic shows the voltages (vd , vq ) and the
fourth graphic shows the error.
-150
40
80
40
80
120
160
200
240
120
160
200
240
t(ms)
100
(%)
+
abc
sDC
d
sDC
q
1
A3dq
3
-100
0
t(ms)
150
100
+
q
50
+
d
s
d
s
q
v , v (%)
0
-50
40
80
40
80
120
160
200
240
120
160
200
240
t(ms)
1
0.5
Then,
s
d
s
q
= - (rad)
-0.5
Figure 2.
-1
t(ms)
1119
(%)
abc
450
300
150
0
-150
40
80
120
t(ms)
160
200
Table II
C OMPARISON OF THE SYNCHRONIZATION METHODS
240
THD(1)
THD(2)
response time(1)
response time(2)
response time(3)
compense offset
+
abc
(%)
100
-100
0
40
80
120
t(ms)
160
200
240
SRF
2.98%
17.67%
No
DSRF
1.16%
23.04%
49.44ms
DSOGI
1.10%
19.25%
42.78ms
36.67ms
No
42.72ms
No
Proposed
0.01%
0.24%
32.06ms
7.78ms
31.89ms
Yes
100
+
d
+
q
v , v (%)
150
0
-50
= - (rad)
V. C ONCLUSION
50
40
80
40
80
120
160
200
240
120
160
200
240
t(ms)
1
0.5
0
-0.5
-1
Figure 3.
t(ms)
1120
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
1121