Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RULE 1: There must be three terms and only three- the major term, the minor term and the
middle term.
For 2 terms to be counted as they must have exactly the same meaning and used exactly in the
same way in each occurrence.
Name of violation: FALLACY OF FOUR TERMS OR FALLACY OF EQUIVOCATION
RULE 2: Each term must occur in two propositions. The major term must occur in the
conclusion, as predicate, and in one of the two premises, which is called the major premise.
The minor term must occur in the conclusion, as subject, and in the other premise, which is
called the minor premise. The middle term must occur in both premises but not in the
conclusion.
Two propositions are necessary for the middle term to be able to fulfill its function of uniting or
separating the major and minor terms and a third proposition is required to express the union or
separation of the minor and major terms.
There being no name for the violation, just write : Violates Rule 2
RULE 3: The major and minor terms may not be universal in the conclusion unless they are
universal in the premises.
We may not conclude about all the inferiors of a term if the premise has given us information about
only some of them.
Name of violation: ILLICIT PROCESS OF THE MAJOR TERM OR ILLICIT PROCESS OF THE
MINOR TERM
RULE 4: The middle term must be universal at least once.
When the middle term is particular in both premises, it might stand for two different portion of its
extension in each occurrence and thus be equivalent to two terms and thereby fail to perform its
function of uniting or separating the major and minor terms.
Name of violation: FALLACY OF THE UNDISTRIBUTED MIDDLE
For the middle term to be able to fulfill its function of uniting or separating the major and minor
terms, it must be united with at least one of them. If both premises are negative the middle term
is not united with either the major term or the minor term. Thus, no conclusion can be drawn from
the premises.
Name of the violation: FALLACY OF NEGATIVE PREMISES
EXAMPLES OF SYLLOGISMS
VALID
Every statute is a law
But, the IPRA is a statute
Therefore, the IPRA is a law
RULE 1
A ruler is an instrument for drawing straight lines
But President Aquino is a ruler
Therefore, President Aquino is an instrument for drawing straight lines
Rule 2
No atheist is an agnostic
But, an atheist is a non-Christian
Therefore, a non-Christian is a non-believer
Rule 3
Artists, without exception, are individuals attuned to their emotions
But, some writers are not artists
Therefore, some writers are not individuals attuned to their emotions
All of the ballerinas are professionals
But, most of the ballerinas are graceful dancers
Therefore, all professionals are graceful dancers
Rule 4
A monkey is banana-eater
But, you are a banana-eater
Therefore, you are a monkey
Rule 5
All prisoners in state penitentiaries are convicted criminals
But, some convicted criminals are incorrigible
Therefore, some convicted criminals are not incorrigible
Rule 6
A crow is never a white bird
But, a dove is a white bird
Therefore, a dove is a crow
Rule 7
No opinion is an absolute statement of a truth
But, not all absolute statements of a truth are facts
Therefore, no opinion is a fact
Rule 8
Almost all bar questions are not multiple choice questions
But some bar questions are difficult questions
Therefore, most multiple choice questions are not difficult questions
Rule 9
Each notarized document is a document with legal character
But some documents with legal character are deeds of conveyances
Therefore, all deeds of conveyances are notarized documents