Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Report
CREEP MOVEMENT AND SOIL MOISTURE STRESS IN
FORESTED VS. CUTOVER SLOPES: RESULTS OF FIELD STUDIES
Donald H. Gray
administered through:
DIVISION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN
August 1977
16
1.1.01.1,1
PO
L.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
vi
ABSTRACT
xi
INTRODUCTION
C.
III.
C.
D.
IV.
SLOPE INSTRUMENTATION
Measurement of Soil Mantle Creep
Measurement of Soil Moisture Stress
iii
6
8
9
20
21
29
29
30
30
32
36
36
37
43
43
45
49
49
50
50
52
54
54
54
56
56
69
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figures
View of clear-cut site, Happy Camp Ranger
District, Klamath National Forest.
11
12
15
16
18
19
24
25
31
33
34
38
39
40
41
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table
Examples of measured rates of natural creep on
forested slopes in the Pacific Northwest.
Summary of average downslope creep rates measured at field research sites.
27
121
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figures
View of clear-cut site, Happy Camp Ranger
District, Klamath National Forest.
11
12
15
16
18
19
24
25
31
33
34
38
39
40
41
vi
Page
Location of field site at the U. S. Naval
Station, near Arlington, Washington.
44
46
47
Down valley view showing extent of denudation of slopes at U. S. Naval Radio Station.
48
51
59
60
62
64
65
66
67
installation.
71
73
Page
Creep profiles, Watershed No. 10, Tube #2,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
74
75
76
77
78
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
91
92
93
viii
Page
Creep profiles, cutover slope, Tube #7, U.S.
Naval Radio Station.
94
95
96
97
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
107
108
109
62. Soil moisture suction vs. antecedent precipitation, Tensiometer #2, Watershed No. 10
(forested), H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest. 110
ix
Page
Figure
Soil moisture suction vs. antecedent precipitation, Tensiometer #2, Watershed No. 10
(forested), H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
111
Comparison of soil moisture suction vs. threemonth antecedent precipitation (forested and
cutover), Tensiometer #2, Watershed No. 10,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
112
Comparison of soil moisture suction vs. threemonth antecedent precipitation (forested and
cutover), Tensiometer #4, Watershed No. 10,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
113
Comparison of soil moisture suction vs. threemonth antecedent precipitation (forested and
cutover), Tensiometer #6, Watershed No. 10,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
114
116
117
119
126
ABSTRACT
Evidence for a cause and effect relationship between
clear-cutting and accelerated mass erosion is reviewed.
Clear-cutting is a timber harvesting procedure commonly
employed on forest lands in many parts of the United States.
The report describes the results of 8-years of creep monitoring and soil moisture stress measurements in forested
and clear-cut slopes. The field data was obtained from
instrumented sites located on steep mountain slopes of the
Cascade Range in Central Oregon; the Klamath Mountains of
Northern California; and the North Cascade Range of Washington.
Trees enhance the strength and stability of soil on
steep slopes mainly through mechanical reinforcement by the
root system and through soil moisture depletion by transpiration. Large scale removal or cutting of trees on steep
.slopes, on the other hand, tends to increase rates of masserosion or mass-soil movement. An emerging concensus in
. the published literature supports this conclusion as do the
results of the study reported herein.
Two types of monitoring studies were established at the
field sites, viz., "side-by-side" comparisons of forested and
adjacent cutover areas and "before-and-after" comparisons at
a single site, initially forested and subsequently clear-cut.
Creep rates were generally higher in cutover or clear-cut
areas as opposedtoadjacent forested_ areas. Creep rates
also tended to increase at sites which were initially
forested and were subsequently clear-cut. Soil creep functions as a primary or initial link in the natural transport
of soil and rock downslope. Acceleration in creep rates
ultimately results in increased rates of mass-erosion and
sedimentation.
Removal of slope vegetation tended to produce wetter
conditions in the instrumented slopes. Wetter soil conditions
are consistent with observed increases in creep rate. Creep
ABSTRACT (Concluded)
rates are also strongly influenced by precipitation patterns
which likewise affect the moisture regime in the soil. In
this regard, the far West has been afflicted with consecutive years of drought which coincided with the post clearcutting monitoring period at several of the sites. Even so,
increases in creep rate were still detected. It is highly
recommended, however, that monitoring of these sites continue in order to observe the creep response under similar
climatic conditions following clear-cutting.
xii
I. INTRODUCTION
A storm of controversy has swirled about the practice
of clear-cutting, a timber harvesting procedure widely employed in many parts of the United States. This practice
became the focus of hearings on management practices in
national timberlands held by the U. S. Senate Committee on
Interior and Insular Affairs in Washington, D.C. in 1971.
The record of these hearings (U. S. Senate Subcommittee on
Public Lands, 1971) provides a wealth of background information on this controversial issue.
The underlying purpose of the study described herein
was to examine only one facet of the clear-cutting controversy, viz., its impact on the stability of natural slopes.
Stability in this case refers to the deep seated stability
of slopes, i.e., resistance to mass wasting rather than
surficial erosion. A specific goal of the study was to
examine creep rates and soil moisture stress in forested as
opposed to cutover slopes.
Soil creep functions as a primary link in the natural
transport of soil and sediment to streams by mass wasting
processes. Creep, a slow downhill movement of the soil
mantle, tends to destabilize midslope areas. Accelerated
creep triggers slump-earth flows which may constrict drainage
channels. This in turn can lead to debris slides and torrents
which scour channel bottoms and deposit debris downstream.
Increased creep rates thus result ultimately in increased
rates of mass wasting and downstream sedimentation.
1
condition
have not
been exposed to the same climatic regime. The ideal situation would have been at least a year of post-cutting precipitation equal to the largest, annual pre-cutting rainfall.
On the other hand, there is also "side-by-side" data available
from sites in Oregon and
Washington to
.111alt
^M.
levels.
Recent studies (Bailey, 1971; Rice and Krammes, 1970;
Swanson and Dyrness, 1975; Dodge et al, 1976; Swanston and
Swanson, 1976) all show a cause and effect relationship between timber harvesting and slope instability. Steep, metastable slopes underlain by weak rock and soils are particularly sensitive to disturbances by man such as road building,
clear-cutting, and vegetation manipulation. Many investigators (Dyrness, 1967; Gonsior and Gardner, 1971; and USDA,
1971)
maintain
instances
both
manipulation
or conversion of
Conversion from
All of these mechanisms except the last, i.e., buttressing action, were investigated in detail by Brown and Sheu
(1975) who showed that the first two were probably the most
important. Surcharge from the weight of trees can have
either a beneficial or adverse effect upon stability depending
on circumstances, but in any event plays only a minor role.
Wind throwing has an adverse influence on stability but likewise plays a minor role (Brown and Sheu, 1975). Buttressing
or soil arching action from tree trunks may actually be an
(1)
= root density
t
m
(2)
= c m + a tan (1)
= a +
(3)
= angle of
internal
empirical
constants
AsR
s R=0
x 100
(4)
Only
Recorder
Normal
Load
'strb,SSN.N
.'N
Anchorage
Shear
Load
Load
Cell
Shear
Box
11
12
containing roots.
Manbeian concluded from his tests that the degree of
contribution of roots to strength is a function of combined
effects of root density, size, root tensile strength, root
morphology, and plant type. Duration of the contribution
was dependent on whether plants were perennial or annual, and
on the rate of root decay. The author did not attempt, however, to delineate these functional relationships nor did he
carry out any tests with woody plants, i.e., shrubs or trees.
Wu (1976) has proposed a simple model to take into
account the contribution of root tensile strength to soil
shear strength. A root's contribution to shear strength
according to this model is given by the expression
As R = t R (cos 6 tan 0 + sin 6)
(5)
Burroughs and Thomas (1976) have recently obtained detailed data on the tensile strength
in the ground
for these two species. With this type of information it
should now be possible to make fairly accurate predictions
and Walkotten, 1970; Rice and Krammes, 1970; and Gray, 1974).
In general these investigators credit tree roots with increasing the stability of soil mantles on steep slopes to
varying extent. The
c 600
O
CI-
cf;
o 500
nc
64.1400
1-cn
w 300
oc
(.7)
E 200
I-
2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10
ROOT DIAMETER INSIDE BARK , Millimeters
Figure 4. Tensile strength of roots of coastal Douglas fir
as a function of time after felling and size of root (after
Burroughs and Thomas, 1976).
s 250
a.
1 200
0
0
La 150
cr)
IT) 100
cc
-J
(7)
50
I-
0
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10
ROOT DIAMETER INSIDE BARK, Millimeters
16
Swanston excavated tree stumps hydraulically in order to determine the distribution of tree roots in a slope. A good
idea of the root morphology and potential for soil reinforcement is shown diagramatically in Figure 6 from the work of
Curtis (1964). A photo of the exposed root system of a
Ponderosa pine in a roadcut is shown in Figure 7. The remarkable vertical roots and extensive lateral root system
have helped to buttress and stabilize the road cut shown in
the photo.
To the extent that live tree roots provide reinforcement; conversely, dead roots will cause loss of strength and
resulting instability. Bishop and Stevens (1964) and Swanston and Walkotten (1970) conclude that the effectiveness of
rooting as a factor in soil shear strength decreases with
age and that soils on oversteepened slopes reach their minimum effective strength due to root anchorage approximately
five years after cutting. This conclusion is based on observations of slopes supporting old growth Sitka spruce-western hemlock stands of timber.
Rice and Krammes (1970) suggest a more slowly deteriorating site (with respect to landslides) following logging.
Their view is supported by observations of logged areas in
the north coast of California. The authors present interesting
photographic evidence of site deterioration commencing and
accelerating some fifteen years after logging. Root strength
decline after tree felling is probably species and site
dependent. The results of laboratory strength tests on
17
1-i
..-
(Swanston,
1967; Bailey and Rice, 1969; Gray, 1970; and Gray and Brenner,
1970).
It is also well established that trees deplete soil
moisture through
condition
?0
Soil creep is a slow, downslope movement or plastic defOrmation of soil on a slope. Soil creep does not necessarily
mean slope failure; in fact, some investigators (Wilson, 1970)
maintain it is difficult to differentiate between plastic
deformation (creep) and incipient failure.
Other investigators (Saito and Uezawa, 1961) disagree,
suggesting that it is possible to forecast slope failure by
21
(6)
m and C = constants
This relationship was found to be valid over a wide
range of strain rate (10
-3
to 10
(7)
Therefore, creep rupture life or time to failure is inversely proportional to strain rate. This relationship was
22
SURCHARGE ,
hr
RIGIDITY
ZONE
HYPOTHETICAL
CREEP PROFILE
CREEP
ZONE
Figure
iFAILURE
13
260
qo = 0.5
12
Mils 4.W =MP iM.
TSF
'240
qo = 0 (NO SURCHARGE)
11
I
VV
-220
'200 w
I0
-180
160
Cl)
tx
a,
or
140
7
h=g6m
I20
100
80 ce
I
,
.1
3
5
CD
Cr ,,,
c
1.
0
--
/
/
1
T
CD
Ii''
60 ta
40
//
2A
ow. woo
8 hp
METERS
Figure 9. Surface creep rate as a function of piezometric
level and surcharge (from Ter-Stepanian, 1963).
25
climates. Kojan (1969) has measured an average downhill velocity of about 11 mm/year (0.44 in/yr) on an average slope of
about 17 in the Northcoast Ranges of California. Swanston
(1969) cites a rate of approximately 6.4 mm/yr (0.25 in/yr)
in the top 6-12 inches of soil in southeast Alaska. Creep
studies (Wilson, 1970) carried out in Western Washington indicate a surface creep rate of approximately 8.1 mm/yr (0.32
in/yr) averaged over a 10-year period. This rate was mea-
26
significant
Location
Coyote Creek
South Umpqua
River drainage,
Cascade Range
of Oregon,
site C-1
Blue River
drainage-Lookout Creek
H. J. Andrews Exp.
Forest, Central
Cascades of Oregon,
site A-1
Blue River
drainage IBP
Experimental
Watershed 10,
Parent Material
Little Butte
Volcanic Series:
deeply weathered
caly-rich andesitic
dacitic volcaniclastic rocks
Little Butte Series:
(same as above)
Little Butte
movement
(m)
At the
surface
(mm/yr)
In zone of
accelerated
movement
(mm/yr)
7.3
14.0
10.9
5.6
7.9
7.1
Volcanic Series
0.5
Baker Creek,
Coquille River,
Coast Range,
Oregon,
Site B-3
Otter Point
Formation:
highly sheared
and altered clay-
7.3
10.4
10.7
Bear Creek,
Nestucca River,
Coast range,
Oregon,
site N-1
Nestucca
Formation:
deeply weathered
pyroclastic rocks
and interbedded,
shaly siltstones
and claystones
15.2
14.9
11.7
Redwood Creek,
Coast Range,
northern Calif.,
site 3-B
Kerr Ranch
Schist:
sheared, deeply
weathered clayey
schist
2.6
15.2
10.4
site No. 4
27
Ter-Stepanian's (1963) theoretical analysis graphically illustrated in Figures 8 and 9 which show that the downslope
creep rate of an inclined soil layer is exponentially related
to the piezometric level in the slope.
Kojan (1969) estimated that in the Eel River drainage
of California, soil creep was producing about 260 metric tons
of sediment per square kilometer of drainage basin. This
volume is about 30 percent of the suspended load which Wallis
(1965) has estimated for the area. This estimate, furthermore, was based on a conservative downhill velocity of only
6 mm per year for a 2.4-meter thick mantle; a much lower rate
than many measured by either Kojan (1969) or Swanston and
Swanson (1976).
Summing up: it appears that soil creep is generally the
most ubiquitous and persistent of all mass erosion processes.
Acceleration in creep rate is a possible precursor of impending slope failure, and increases in creep rate can lead
to increased rates of mass wasting and sediment loading to
streams. The linkage between these processes is shown
schematically in Figure 75. Creep rates are primarily dependent on slope angle, soil characteristics, and soil moisture stress. Trees and vegetation are likely to affect creep
rates by modifying the latter two factors. For all of these
reasons, field measurements of soil creep before and after
cutting are a useful method of assessing the impact of clearcutting and vegetation removal on the stability of slopes.
28
L..
III'
Salem
111Wp
a
44.et.
IND
Riwel
Eugene
/ottage Grove
(I
,111101,
L.
Role
Scale in Miles
5
0
5
10 15 20 25
1-Fm-14-1==mm--
*Watershed No. 2-3 is a forested slope loca J ed between Watersheds Nos 2 and 3.
32
EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHEDS,
H. J. ANDREWS EXPERIMENTAL FOREST.
STUDY AREAS
WATERSHED 3
CLEAR-CUT
SITE
1/4
PRECIPITATION
GAGES
1/2 MILE
2100
2000
Instrumented
1900
60 1800 Plot
1700
11111!111' 2100
1600
111.1111111
11:11:11
1111
1141
11
1500
I I I I I I I 1 II 1 "
e.
1700
2000
I I I I I 114t((
1800
WATERSHED 10
0 100 200 300 400
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL- 25 FEET
formed from agglomerates, tuff, and breccia--is characteristic of midslope and low-ridge positions. This soil is very
unstable and easily disturbed by road construction. The
third soil, a clay loam formed from colluvial materials,
occupies gentle slopes and benches. All three soil types
support forest vegetation and are strongly acid.
Slope instability appears to be strongly correlated
with soil type. Dyrness (1967) examined the relationship between mass-movement events and various site factors. He
found that mass soil movements occurred much more frequently
in areas of pyroclastic rocks (tuffs and breccias) than in
areas where the bedrock is comprised of basalt or andesite.
In addition, greenish tuffs and breccias appeared to be more
unstable than their reddish counterparts. The unstable nature
of these materials is even more apparent when one notes that
64 percent of the mass-movements were on greenish tuffs and
breccias which make up only 8 percent of the total area.
Soil instability is partly related to clay mineralogy. Dominant clay minerals are montmorillonite, kaolinite, and chloritic intergrades. The more unstable soils are those containing
montmorillomite as the principal clay mineral (Paeth, 1970).
The instrumented site in Watershed No. 1 is located on
largely colluvial material whereas the site in Watershed No.
10 is located on a residual soil derived from tuff. The
thickness of soil or depth to bedrock at these sites ranges
from 11 to 16 feet.
35
37
38
40
41
42
litityLikt
23
Z
19
22
21
4 ,^ i
I
I
29
Ii
.--./VA'V
AL
1-:
.
-0-7. - . --- --- ,:-.:1 ",- 4 frim -_
1- nol i
.
A,
'
;
. .. .,
r i...'
--.,-1.
',...f.,
's.
1.4
5
3 4d
RESEIRVATIUN
-
;1
4.
T
I
.1.
81
I
18
Blur Mount.sin
17
lc
73/N
15
14
0 I o
21
22
23
28
32
33
-14
R7
Figure 17. Location of field site at the U. S. Naval Radio Station,
near Arlington, Washington (from USGS Granite Falls quadrangle).
44
46
"?,.
'-
:v
1441%
v..-" , - ea";
kit
!:
...
Jt
4:14'74-
'
sr`0.-tt,.
4,'!" ;
4.
e
t.- r
.j,
* v*.
-,
44
7
.#
-t :.. .
1::1,...=t-.4
rt
'-.';'*:.':VP..*4!:'`'
s. sj7
4*
Pk: ' 1...1. A
"
4A."tia.% '''..
;t.,44.A
44144 121-::
tkvi:4:47..r..trok-
.'"+,401A'
T
V'....i.L.... -... ....VI 11.1.1.!,
..--,.. 1' '.j.
,.~-t4"......,
-;44
..
pr...,,0..
:**
.t 1,..70:7;
11,...?
..i.7
/..lci .4:744t7
:. . 1417.41.
. 47t47:
.t.;:.:1'.
1:...
.,::;:r;:.i.....:: ...:.....:1.11.:171.1"lie
lt..1-4..
......
..c.
:71.::"
..::
:7
.,..:11
.:..
11
A.
-.ito
, ' 417.1 ,/,-,'" 4,."' *
.; : - 4.... ' . - ..,1, . %*: . ,.,,,,..t,
.
P A ' i'i.
* .t.'14 14, , ..'.
,'.! ... i -,).. ..- ,t.. "......".
7-1-..1,1
'-:,....0-41it 44:+3.11
Th(tat--. 1114.,,r, ...-,31:4'!. ! . .1'. AV
."e
.......
. 41: .4:144 1-.,,', ; 7...:;144.....".".
.. , .,7.- '"e:".."
.
, '.. t 2. 7;
..17.ll `; .te.: )4.; ''' ''.. 7Z i'f .r.,5P . I .,..nr".,
'(.. it"4. tb..;1. 0...
15Vii-:i;.: :-11..
':"t71.....,..-.t7;61
r` t... . P; '..- 7Ii4
-4:;..4\e..
..i.jte
:,^..4.
-.1-.
1- 2."e:
.:1:
..t
--1' ..... ....... I
'S :: - If tic.,
47
48
Figure 21. Location of field study sites in the Klamath National Forest
(from USFS recreation map, Happy Camp Ranger District).
51
landslide which was cute., e,.- several years ago. The influence
of tree removal on the vciocity of downslope movement in this
slope is unknown because no recor.is on observations were made
prior to timber harvesting. Fossil slides often develop deep
soils and are relatively stable under wouern, climatic conditions. Unfortunately, logging and road construction in the
region sometimes reactivates slippage (Hicks and Collins,
1970). The other site in the Little South Fork area (referred
to as the Little South Fork annex) is nearly adjacent and is
an active slide. It still retains a tree cover, although
many trees are canted at extreme angles as a result of deep
seated movement. Both these sites were instrumented to obtain an estimate of the extent and rate of deformation in
slide areas.
The Clearview sale site was originally forested and was
instrumented in 1970 in order to obtain a "before-and-after"
comparison of creep rates following clear-cutting. This site
was clear-cut during the summer of 1974.
2. Soils and Geology
The geology of the Klamath Mountains is complex; they
consist essentially of metamorphic rocks intruded by granitic
and ultramatic masses. The metamorphic rocks are mainly
schist, phyllite, slate, chert, and marble. The granitic
rocks are granodiorite, quartz diorite, and hornblende diorite.
Thrust faults, trending north-south and dipping east, separate
major lithologic boundaries. Many of the ultramafic bodies
were intruded along the thrust faults.
52
53
54
55
instrumentation
were measurement of creep rates and soil moisture stress before and after clear-cutting. This section describes the
field instrumentation and procedure used to measure rates
of downslope movement or soil mantle creep.
A commercially available inclinometer known as a Slope
Indicator was selected for this purpsoe. Inclinometers are
used extensively in civil engineering practice to investigate
the performance of embankments and to monitor earth movements
in natural slopes. These devices basically consist of a
pendulum-activated transducer enclosed in a watertight torpedo, which is lowered down a near-vertical casing. The inclination from vertical is measured at successive intervals
down the casing. Lateral movements in a slope deflect the
casing, thus changing its inclination. Changes in
inclina-
tion with time can be translated back into a deformation versus depth curve which varies with time. From these curves it
is then possible to calculate creep rates in the soil mantle.
The inclinometer (or Slope Indicator) used in the present study has been described in detail by Wilson (1962). it
consists of a pendulum-actuated Wheatstone-bridge circuit enclosed in a wheel-mounted torpedo whose azimuth is controlled
by vertical grooves formed in the walls of special extruded
aluminum casing. The output from the
sensing element
of the
%L.
Figure 22. Slope indicator, control box, and top of casing or tubing.
60
61
62
63
Figure 25. Douglas fir snag (dead tree) located next to inclinometer
tube No. 4, Watershed Nh. 10, H. J. Andre,:b Experithentn1 Forest.
ACCESS ROAD TO
TOP -t.U.S.4# 10
TRAIL
REF. BASELINE
(AZ. FROM I.P =130)
tr
2830'
RIDGE LINE
B.M.#1
#2
#3
X#4
3, *5 #6..
17
98'11..
.....
Well No.2
#7
14/
#8
52'5"
41' II"
#9
Well No.1
Well No.3
to
3 %. 3
#14
/23'4"
#11
ell Na 5 38'liC
#13
Well No.4
60'0"
I
I
#12
NOTE:
All lengths shown are
slope distances
* 15 Well No.6
GRID
LINE 2-S
65
5B
4B
3B
1B
2B
Trail No. 3310
Watershed No. 1
FORESTED
#8 N
100' 1-160
I
CUTOVER
17,
.0
# IA
150 '-14
#5
18'
80'+ 70
i) # 4
41
#2
TRAI
#6
300'
SLIP
SLIDE
LD3I
BURMA RD.
MAG. Az = 350
HOLE B
TUBE
INCL.
DIRT ROAD
MAG. Az = 34
BLDG. 11
#15
TO TRANS. STN. 0
"Annex"
Slide
Old Slide
.oul
Little South Fork
Logging
Road
vuo
Logging
Road
C. Condrey Mountain
Figure 29. Siting pattern for inclinometer tubes installed at various
sites in the Klamath National Forest.
68
centibars compared to 1 or 2 millibars for the mercury,manometer type, but they are far more rugged. The tensiometers
were installed with their measuring tips 5 feet below the
surface of the ground and their tops recessed about a foot
below the ground surface in a 4-inch diameter cased hole.
Figure 30 is a schematic illustration of a typical tensiometer
installation.
Tensiometers will cavitate and eventually lose their
70
/Cased Hole
Tensiometer
s.\\N
sN
SOIL
Porous Tip
MANTLE
BEDROCK
71
0.0
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
.04
1T
.08
.12
.16
I
.20
I
TUBE NO. I
INSTALLED 7 / 69
CLEAR CUT 7 /
Figure 31. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 10, Tube #1, H. J.
Andrews Experimental Forest.
73
0.00
II1IIIII
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
.20
.10
'70 '72
'73
'7H '75
.30
.40
'76
,,--'-'77
TUBE NO. 2
INSTALLED 7 / E
CLEAR CUT 7 /75
Figure 32. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 10, Tube #2, H. J.
Andrews Experimental Forest.
74
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
-.02
I
0.00
.02
1-
'70
.0L1
1
'7L1
.06
1
.08
1
'75 '76
TUBE ND. 3
INSTALLED 7 /S9
CLEAR CUT 7 /75
Figure 33. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 10, Tube *3, H. J.
Andrews Experimental Forest.
75
.10
1
0 . 00
1
'70
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
. 10
.20
.30
I
I.
'72
'73 '7'i
.40
I
i
'7E '7E
TUBE NO. 4
INSTALLED 7 / ES
CLEAR CUT 7 / 75
Figure 34. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 10, Tube #4, H. J.
Andrews Experimental Forest.
76
O.021
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
.
.
.IS
I1I
/ 71
/72 / 73
/7L1
TUBE NO.
I NM-FILLED 7 / BB
CLEAR CUT 7 /
Figure 35. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 10, Tube #6, H. J.
Andrews Experimental Forest.
77
. 20
North Downslope
90
13'
80
70
12'
60
50
Numerals Indicate
Height Above Bottom
of Tubing
40
11'
30
20
Well No. 4
10'
6'
4'
West
-30
10
2'
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CUMULATIVE DIAL CHANGE READINGS IN-S I
East
Figure 36. Polar diagram of total creep movement (1973), Watershed No. 10
some instances they were omitted from the figures for clarity
of presentation or simply because no inclinometer readings
were taken in a particular hole that year. In a very few
instances a profile was omitted because of an obvious error
in taking the readings. Occassionally profiles for subsequent
years lie uphill of the preceding years. This behavior is
shown for example in Figure 42 by Tube #3B, Watershed 2-3,
and in Figure 33 by Tube #3, Watershed 10. The most likely
explanation for this behavior is that the affected profiles
lie within each other's error band, and hence an apparent but
spurious uphill movement may be indicated for a particular
year. Another source of apparent but steady uphill movement
of the profile is rotational movement in the ground. Rotational movement occurring within or near the base of a slide
mass will cause an imbedded inclinometer to tilt backwards.
If the base of the inclinometer tube does not penetrate beyond the sliding surface, and apparent and steady uphill
movement or backward tilting will be reflected in the creep
profiles as shown, for example, in Figure 54 by Tube #1,
Little South Fork site, Klamath National Forest. This tube
was one of several imbedded in a large landslide.
The influence of tree removal or clear-cutting on creep
movement can be ascertained by careful study of the creep
profiles themselves. This topic is also discussed in a subsequent section of the report in which the creep data have
been replotted in order to compare creep rates more readily
between forested and cutover slopes. A fairly pronounced
80
81
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
. 04 r1
TUBE NO . 2 -R
INSTALLED B / 68
Figure 37. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 1 (clear-cut), Tube #2A,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
0.00
TUBE DEFLECTIONINCHES
,05
. 221
1
.0
.321
is I
'ES '721
177
TUBE ND. 3 H
INSTALLED
BB
Figure 38. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 1 (clear-cut), Tube #3A,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
83
-.02
.0.00
t.t
72
I ,c4, 1 cL
1 .02 .03XS
.04
.0S . 0 .OW.09
.0
II
I I.:, 1 ,4, I : _
.10
fps
59
10
TUBE ND . 6 II
I NETFILLED 8 / 58
Figure 39. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 1 (clear-cut), Tube #6A,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
84
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
.10
.0S
TUBE NO B -R
INSTALLED B / BB
Figure 40. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 1 (clear-cut), Tube #8A,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
85
-.02
0.00
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
I
.02
.04
.0S
.08
.10
TUBE NO. 2 -B
INSTALLED B /
Figure 41. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 2-3 (forested), Tube #2B,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
86
6.1
gima
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
I
.21H
.Be
I
.12
1
12
' SS 1 76 \1 75
'se
73
'77
1E1
TUBE NO . 3 -B
1 NSTRLLED B / EB
Figure 42. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 2-3 (forested), Tube #3B,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
87
-.02
0.00
Ilir
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
.02
.04
.0S
.08
.lo
iss
I N5TALLED B / EB
Figure 43. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 2-3 (forested), Tube #4B,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
88
-.02
I
. 0 . 00
.02
I
.0e
.06
.I0
.0H
11111111
61 6e
TUBE ND. E -B
I NETALLED 8 / El
Figure 44. Creep profiles, Watershed No. 2-3 (forested), Tube #5B,
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.
89
. 221
.132
1
11
. 011-1.
1
PJF
I
. P18
I
. 113
I
. 12
1
.
1
I
"78
TUBE NO . 2
INSTALLED 7 /
Figure 45. Creep profiles, cutover slope, Tube #2, U.S. Naval
Radio Station.
91
ga.om
TUBE DEFLECTIDN-INCHES
I
.0H
1
.013
1
.12
1
.1E
1
.20
1
TUBE ND. 3
INSTALLED 7 /7E1
Figure 46. Creep profiles, cutover slope, Tube #3, U.S. Naval
Radio Station.
92
.2H
1
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
-.131
1
0.00
1
.01
1
.02
I
.03
1
.0L1
1
73 '7H
47
TUBE NO. E
INSTALLED 7 /70
Figure 47. Creep profiles, cutover slope, Tube #5, U.S. Naval
Radio Station.
93
.05
1
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
0.00
-.05
I
1
I
.05
1
.10
1
.15
1
.20
1
.25
1
.30
1
"7,477
TUBE NO. 7
INS-FILLED 7 /70
Figure 48. Creep profiles, cutover slope, Tube #7, U.S. Naval
Radio Station.
0.00
. io
I
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
I
.20
I
.30
I
.'10
'I
TUBE NO. B
I NSTALLED 7 / 70
Figure 49. Creep profiles, forested slope, Tube #8, U.S. Naval
Radio Station.
95
.50
I
0.00
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
.20
. 10
.30
TUBE NO.
INSTALLED 7 / 70
Figure 50. Creep profiles, forested slope, Tube #9, U.S. Naval
Radio Station.
96
1-10
GRID AZIMUTH:+139
-50 0
+00
+200
1
I
12/28/56
....
..I
I
12/28/66
.%
,7
TOP
OF CASING4-0
GROUND
SURFACE
5
10
Li)
tit
0
U.1
.t[z
i34:r
_Jo
W.T. 12/28/66 a
2/19/70
\)
10/24/58
- ------ .., ...,
..... ....
.44-2/19/70'
_.;.
1
f
i
#
,= ,,
--1
i
7/24/ 76
..."
25
CHANGES IN DIAL READINGS
cr
Iti
20
i
.?
15
o:
;1
:,
..i: : i, i
:
- /
W.T. II/1/56
/- <I
C.,
LLI <
0 -.1
0 (-9
06
i
4
<
to
!
i 12/28/6
I"- 2/19/70
:!
2 Z
0 <
C.) CC
0
>-J
2.0
1.0
+300 0
*."--12/28/6
.,10/24/58
30
MOVEMENT(INCHES)
I
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
.0S
I
.10
1
.20
1 76
'73
'75
12
13
ILl
1E
16
7
19
20
TUBE NO . I
NSTFILLED 8 / 7I
CLEAR CUT 8/ 74
Figure 52. Creep profiles, Clearview site, Tube #1, Klamath
National Forest.
99
-.03
1
0.00
.03
I
2
3 '72
.06
I
.09'
1
`73
4
E
7
9
iD
12
13
11-1
1E
IS
17
18
1
TUBE I111 2
INSTALLED 8 l 71
Figure 53. Creep profiles, Clearview site, Tube #2, Klamath
National Forest.
100
.12
1
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-.E
-1.0
21.0
.dr
i
172
17E
E
6
7
8
9
IFJ
11
12
13
TUBE NO .1
1 NSTFILLEEY /7 1
Figure 54. Creep profiles, Little South Fork landslide, Tube #1,
Klamath National Forest.
101
0.0
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
5.0
I'
10.0
15.0
20:0
1
25.0
`75
TUBE NO. 2
INSTALLED 7 /71
Figure 55. Creep profiles, Little South Fork landslide, Tube #2,
Klamath National Forest.
102
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
-5.21
0.21
E.0
10.0
1E.0
20.0
25.0
175
172
13
TUBE NO. 4
I NSTRLLED 7 / 7 I
Figure.56. Creep profiles, Little South Fork landslide, Tube #4,
Klamath National Forest.
103
TUBE DEFLECTION-INCHES
-I .0 0.0
1
1
'72 '73
17
3
LI
S
7
10
11
12
13
17
TUBE NO. 5
1 NSTFILLED 7 / 71
Figure 57. Creep profiles, Little South Fork landslide, Tube #5,
Klamath National Forest.
104
-1.0 0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
L1.0
E.0
6.0
7.0
'72 '73
-2
_3
_s
-10
-11
-12
MBE ND. 7
INSTALLED 8 / 7I
Figure 58. Creep profiles, Little South Fork landslide, Tube #7,
Klamath National Forest.
105
#1
106
40
PRECIPITATION RECORD
H.J. ANDREWS FOREST
OREGON
35
30
E 25
i-_-_- 20
a:
cr
15
10
5
(85)
0
(107)
1970
(121)
1971
(60)
(119)
_J
1972
92)\A (99)
(43)
1975
1973
1974
ELAPSED TIME , Years
1976
1977
90
80
70
Tensiometer No. 2
x Tensiometer No. 4
60
50
L.L.1
40
30
20
0
--1 10
0
24
22
20
6
4
2
J ASOND JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND
1969
1970
1971
Figure 60.
1 08
90 i '
80' 4,
70 70
Tensiometer No. 2
x Tensiometer No. 4
Tensiometer No. 1
Tensiometer No. 6
() 60-1?
50
)17. 40b
w 30
v" 20
[No Readings
r Taken
10
0
24
22
20
v., 18
L.,
C..) 16
z
zI
I=
14
12
10
8
6
4
109
80
(/)
.,:c
= 60
One Month
CC
IV)
20
0
00
9,1)
20
10
30
40
50
CUMULATIVE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION (INCHES 1
80
20
3
00
10
20
30
40
50
CUMULATIVE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION ( INCHES I
80
<
O z
(-3
40
20
0
00
0 0
0
co
0 co
0cP
0
10
20
30
40
50
CUMULATIVE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION (INCHES )
110
80
a) 6)
60
Four Months
40
00
20
0
tf)
0
CD
80--
1--
L.)
=
tr) 60
Lo c,
= <
_
co
(r) e.._ 40
5
....,
10
0 0
00
0
fl
IU
0 ap
0
I
0/
20
40
30
50
60
CUMULATIVE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION ( INCHES I
00 00
70
Five Months
(--) 20--
t/1
0
0
00
1 ap0 0
1
10
40
50
20
30
60
CUMULATIVE ANTECEDENT PREC I PITAT ION ( I NCHES 1
1 0
I
70
100
(.4
80
03
C.)
---
LAJ
ce
Tensiometer No. 2
60
0 Forested
Clear-Cut
40
20
-\\V
oo
a V.4
A "V,PA t
1,41.4Vvit4 "Ivor vir
.44.0.k.taltta
e Jr tie rtt'
. 0,
10
20
'
30
=272Z
40
50
112
Tensiometer No. 4
Forested
A Clear-Cut
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
113
100
Tensiometer No. 6
Forested
,ti
Clear-Cut
CD
-J
-0
U1
20
10
20
30
40
I
50
114
as inverse mirror images of the precipitation curves; as precipitation increases soil suction drops off and vice versa.
An attempt was made to look for a relationship between
soil suction and antecedent precipitation of different duration using the data from tensiometer No. 2 as shown in Figures
62 and 63. A three-month antecedent precipitation total
appeared to give the best relationship although scatter of
data was still considerable. Soil suction vs. three-month
antecedent precipitation for all the tensiometers is shown
plotted in Figures 64 through 66. Suction vs. precipitation
for the slope in both a forested and clear-cut condition are
shown plotted in these figures.
2. U.S. Naval Radio Station
Monthly precipitation totals at the U.S. Naval Station
during the period 1970-1977 are plotted in Figure 67. Annual
totals for the same period are also shown. The precipitation
pattern at the Station differs from the Oregon site in
several respects. The
annual totals
40
PRECIPITATION RECORD
JIM CREEK U.S. NAVAL STN
WASHINGTON
35
u, 30
.cua)
5. 25
Z.
o
- rz. 20
<
I-a_ 15
0
Lii
x
a. 10
5
0
1970
(i01)
1
1971
000)
1
(4)
9 A (77)
1
1
(72)
(96)
(51)
1976
1975
1974
1972
1973
ELAPSED TIME, Years
A
'\
1977
i1
I'
Total
Surface
Creep:
-0-.060"
Ave Slope
Angle:
38
.190"
. 058:"
. 006"
37
330
320
7/7/ /
.051"
32
32
7/ / / /
No. 1
No. 7
. 021"
No. 3
ry)
No. 5
(E
No. 2
No. 6
Horizontal Scale: 1 CM = 20'
Vertical Scale:
1 CM = 2'
Figure 68. Piezometric levels (July 1973) and surface creep movements measured
in inclinometer tubes located on cutover slope, U. S. Naval Radio Station.
Iles
40
PRECIPITATION RECORD
35 HAPPY CAMP RANGER STATION
CALIFORNIA
cU
C
30
. 25
Z
0
1
-:-- 20
.tt
Fa:
5 15 Y._
w
w
a. 10
..
I
5
0 (59
( 5 9)
1970
1971
38)
1
(89)
1972
1973
1975
1974
ELAPSED TIME , Years
21
1976
1977
120
Status
Tube
No.
Creep Rate
@ Surface
mm/yr
Watershed No. 1
H. J. Andrews, Oregon
clearcut
2A
3A
6A
8A
slope ave.
.41
.91
.40
.64
0.59
forested
2B
3B
4B
5B
slope ave.
.13
.32
.10
.42
0.24
Watershed No. 10
H. J. Andrews, Oregon
forested
(except @
Tube #4)
#1
#2
#4
#6
slope ave.
(excl. #4)
.69
1.14
1.38
.88
0.90
cutover
slope
#1
#2
#3
#5
#7
slope ave.
(excl. #1 & 5)
.08
.57
.95
.08
.61
0.71
forested
slope
#3
#9
slope ave.
.91
.57
0.74
cutover
slope
Test pit
#2
8.16
121
0.50
0.45
L0 0.40
c
F..-
z
L.,
0.35
2
w 0.30
>
0
2 0.25
a.
LL.,
Li.i
x 0.20
(..)
Lii
c.)
0.15
Cr
D
Cr) 0.10
0.05
1968
1969
1970
1971
1974
1973
ELAPSED TIME, Y ears
1972
1975
1976
1977
0.45
tn 0.40
Q)
2 0.35
0.30
0 0.25
TUBE # 2B (9')
TUBE # 3B (9')
TUBE #4B (6')
TUBE # 5B (41
La 020
w
o
o=
w 0.15
cr 0.10
U)
0.05
4111.0...
*MIND 01 11110 OIMMMO IMIMM 11 MI
AWM ......
1968
1969
1970
OmMmm
1972
1973
1974
1971
ELAPSED TIME, Years
1975
1976
197 7
0.50
0.45
al 0 . 4 0
E-7
WATERSHED NO. 10
H.J. ANDREWS FOREST
OREGON
CUTOVER
0.35
TUBE #4
(14')
0.30
2 0.25
a_
f
FORESTED
TUBE #2
(91)
..) 0.20
105-
LI 0.15
CC
(1)
0.10
TUBE #1
(15')
0.05
0
5
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
ELAPSED TIME , Years
1975
1976
1977
I. ,
0.45
0.40
.100
as
von'
am/
0.35
Fi
L.LJ
0.30
ON= AMID 4011 =1.
Cutover Slope
Forested Slope
0.25
a_
J
cn
-4Le
0.20
015
0 0.10
0.05
0
1970
1971
1972
1975
1974
1973
ELAPSED TIME , Years
1976
1977
f)) 6
LL.1
a_ 3
z2
7
12
17
".1 I II II II hi
1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976
ELAPSED TIME ,Years
Figure 74. Creep movement at various depths vs. elapsed time,
slope above transmitter building, U.S. Naval Radio Station.
127
all three field sites as discussed previously. This observation was always made, however, in the summer. During this
time of year the absence of significant precipitation coupled
with the presence of transpiring slope vegetation can indeed
result in a moisture deficit in the ground and the development of higher soil moisture suction in forested as opposed
to cutover sites. Results of the present field study corroborate the findings of other investigators in this regard,
e.g., Bethlahmy (1962), Patric et al (1968), and Hallin (1967)
A more critical question with regard to slope stability
is what happens to soil moisture stress in forested as compared to cutover slopes in the winter when intense and frequent storms tend to saturate the ground and when transpiration is reduced. This is the time that is critical for slope
stability because of the loss of tension in the pore water
and the development of piezometric heads which can greatly
reduce shear resistance and stability. No "side-by-side"
comparisons of soil moisture stress are available from the
present study to answer this question. There are however the
results of soil moisture measurements in Watershed No. 10,
H. J. Andrews Forest, which were obtained while the slopes
were in both a forested and clear-cut condition.
Precipitation patterns will also affect soil moisture
stress response. In order to use the results of the tensiometer measurements in Watershed 10 for comparison it is
necessary to take into account climatic differences between
the two monitoring periods. This was done by plotting soil
126
130
H I LL SLOPE
A4,F3A,7
STREAM
CHAN N ELT-
.1
TORRENT
.%
11ww...
.w.weam
/.
..%
...
'..
'131
132
with time after felling. From this work plus the earlier
studies by Swanston (1970) it is clear that sufficient time
must elapse before loss of root strength will manifest itself
in accelerated creep rates and other forms of mass-wasting
or erosion. Both Watershed No. 10, H. J. Andrews Forest,
and the Clearview site, Klamath National Forest, thus have
not been observed over a sufficiently long enough period of
time following cutting to detect effects of significant root
deterioration. It is very important, therefore, that monitoring continue for at least another 3 years at these sites.
A second reason for this continued monitoring is to observe
the creep response of these sites during a wetter climatic
season. The post cutting monitoring period at the two sites
has so far coincided with record dry years. The creep record
from Tube #4 which was installed originally in an area of
dead trees in the midst of a forested slope (Watershed No. 10,
H. J. Andrews Forest) provides some clue or indication of the
effects of root deterioration. Creep rates have been consistently higher at this location over a 7-year monitoring
period relative to rates measured in neighboring tubes installed in forested portions of the slope.
133
VII. CONCLUSIONS
134
135
136
VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The research described herein was supported by Grants
Nos. ENG 74-02427 and GK-24747 from the National Science
Foundation. The Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment
Station, U.S. Forest Service, kindly made available the study
areas in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest. Logistical
aid and manpower assistance were furnished by U.S. Forest
Service personnel in the Klamath National Forest. The permission of the U.S. Navy to instrument a site at the Naval
Radio Station at Jim Creek likewise is acknowledged.
Several persons in the U.S. Forest Service have been
particularly helpful and instrumental in making the field
studies possible. They include Ross Mersereau, Field Research
Supervisor, and Dick Fredriksen, Soil Scientist, both with
the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station;
and Bill Hicks, Engineering Geologist, presently with the
Rogue River National Forest.
Peter Bosscher assisted with the analysis of field data,
plotting of creep profiles, and preparation of this report.
Roger Gray and Peter Brenner provided photographic assistance.
Last but not least the assistance of the many students, both
graduate and undergraduate, who assisted with the early field
work is greatly acknowledged. Installation of the inclinometers
on steep slopes often without benefit of existing trails was a
demanding task. Persons assisting in this capacity over a
four-year period include Peter Brenner, In-Kuin Kim, Ted Webster,
Steve Flodin, Jerry Carignani, Maurice Cooper, and Dana Bayuk.
137
IX. REFERENCES
Bailey, R. G. and Rice, R. M. (1969), "Soil Slippage: An
Indicator of Slope Instability on Chapparal Watersheds
of Southern California," The Professional Geographer,
Vol. XXI, No. 3, pp. 172-177.
Bailey, R. G. (1971), "Landslide Hazards Related to Land Use
Planning in the Teton National Forest, Northwest
Wyoming," U.S. Forest Service publication, Intermountain
Region, Ogden, Utah, 131 pp.
Bethlahmy, N. (1962), "First Year Effects of Timber Removal
on Soil Moisture," Int. Assn. Sci. Hydrol. Bull., Vol.
7, No. 2, pp. 34-38.
Brown, C. B. and Sheu, M. S. (1975), "Effects of Deforestation on Slopes," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering
Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, pp. 147-165.
Burroughs, E. P. and Thomas, R. R. (1976), "Root Strength of
Doulgas-fir as a Factor in Slope Stability," USDA,
Forest Service, review draft INT 1600-12 (9/66), 30 pp.
Crandell, D. R. and Waldron, H. H. (1952), "Geology of Part
of the U.S. Naval Radio Station," Arlington, Washington,
U.S. Geological Survey, Dept. of the Interior, 25 pp.
(May).
Curtis, J. D. (1964), "Roots of a Ponderosa Pine," USDA
Forest Service, Research Paper INT-9, 10 pp.
Dodge, et al (1976), "An Investigation of Soil Characteristics
and Erosion Rates on California Forest Lands," State of
California Resources Agency, Department of Forestry,
105 pp.
139
140
141