Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A
the time of the final collapse of the short or
historical chronology it is important to be able to
compare the calibrated l4C-dates with as detailed
and elaborated relative chronological data as possib
le. Therefore it is still necessary to draw attention to
some problems with the final Neolithic and Early
Copper Age in the Carpathian basin. Although this is
not, in fact, a poorly researched area, I have found
the following unclarified points that are worth to
mention.
1. Did the process of Chalcolithisation happen sud
denly in Transdanubia, caused by immigrant
groups of people as assumed earlier, or was it
similar to that of the Tisza region?
2. Why did they not happen at about the same time?
To begin with some general remarks, the transition
between the Late Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods
should be considered as evidence. While Western
Hungary was filled with the Lengyel II - later the
Lengyel - III population, in the Tisza region the late
Tisza-Herply-Csszhalom groups were in the main
living in tell settlements, which survived till the Early
Tiszapolgr culture. The slow process of Chal
colithisation is well-known, since the Proto-Tiszapolgr-horizon has been identified in the Herply mo
und (KALICZ-RACZKY 1984.33.). It is an established
fact that tell settlements were abandoned gradually,
thus the Early Copper Age began with a slow struc
tural change (PATAY 1983.49.).
Meanwhile, since these periods have been the
focal point of archaeological interest, it has become
clear that instead of concentrated tells, several smaller
provisional settlements came into use together with
separate cemeteries and circular ditches intended for
non profane purposes (KLLAY 1990).
There is also a consensus of opinion in the nomina
tion since the early works of I. Kutzin and later those
of P. Patay (KUTZIN 1963.535-538; KUTZIN 1972.
183-188; PATAY 1974.) that the Copper Age begins with
the Tiszapolgr culture and the Middle Copper Age is
represented by the Bodrogkeresztr culture.
In short, it is fairly well-known when and how
structural change happened in Eastern Hungary. Its
relative chronological situation is reinforced by its
Eszter BNFFY
rectangular oil lamps or little altarpieces, some tiny
pieces of furniture, a larger cult vessel with four long
heads, probably those of animals, and a double
headed ram applied to a clay lid, all fit into the
Lengyel spiritual inheritance well.
There are two phenomena to show that our previous knowledge of the youngest Lengyel phase was
unsufficient: firstly, the pottery is not limited to
thick-walled, undecorated and roughly elaborated
types, rather, a fairly large percentage of the material
belongs to extremely thin, so-called china"-ware,
consisting of small cups, and very often miniature
versions of large vessel types. Secondly, in the socalled unpainted" Lengyel phase there are in many
cases traces of monochrome red paint observable,
especially on the fine ware, on pedestalled vessels
or on altarpieces.
These observations agree with the concept that at the
time of the Tiszapolgr culture one has to reckon on a
retarded Neolithic development in Transdanubia.
292
293
Eszter BNFFY
100km
294
Eszter BNFFY
Institute of Archaeology of the
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1250 Budapest Pf. 14.
Hungary
295
Eszter BNFFY
A Dunntl s Kelet-Magyarorszg
a kora rzkorban
BANFFY Eszter
BNFFY Eszter
Magyar Tudomnyos Akadmia
Rgszeti Intzet
1250 Budapest Pf. 14.
296