Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are a number of reasons for paralleling generator sets, including redundancy, ease
of maintenance, load management, and speed of load acquisition. However, once you
have a paralleled emergency generator system, the challenge is how to make sure that
each of the generators carries its portion of the total load on the system.
Following are several of the more common systems for load apportioning and their
operating characteristics. The engineer must evaluate their particular installation to
determine how sensitive their critical loads are to voltage and frequency variation, how
often the loads start and stop, and whether the generators are perfectly matched, so that
he can select the appropriate control system.
Proportional control of the loads on a group of paralleled generators is key to smooth,
trouble-free operation, whether for standby or prime-power applications. Control
schemes that are commonly used to achieve load sharing are the:
Droop control system
Isochronous control system
Reactive droop compensation system
Cross-current compensation system.
Each of these systems has pros and cons for simplicity and operational characteristics,
and when engineering a generator paralleling system, the engineer must carefully
consider these characteristics so that the system provides power that is suitable for the
connected loads.
Load sharing history
Historically, load sharing on paralleled generators was not a big issue, because the
generators were, typically, the same full-load capacity, the same governor, the same
operating characteristicspretty much identical units. As long as the mechanical
governors were calibrated so the same load change would result in the same throttle
position adjustment, the generators would share loads equally.
As the systems transitioned to electronic controls and those became more sophisticated,
load sharing became possible with differing generator sizes and, in some cases, different
control components. As early as 1984, control systems were available that would allow
varying sized generators that were remotely located from one another, to parallel to a
common bus.
Load sharing today
In contrast to droop control, the isochronous system maintains a constant engine speed
with either a constant or varying load. Thus the frequency and voltage of the system
remains constant, providing much higher power quality than that of the droop control
system. As with the droop control system, the generator sizes and controls may vary in
manufacturer and will still load share. To permit each generator to carry its proportion
of the total load, an isochronous load sharing control (ILS) will sample the voltage and
current information from each generator. With this information from each of the
generator sets, the ILS can calculate correction signals for each generator governor and
adjust the fuel rate, which allows proportioning the total load to each generator,
according to its capability (Figure 2).
In contrast to the generator size and manufacturer variations, the communications
network must typically use the same governors, the same load sharing controls, and
even the same model of communications interface. This is due to the lack of industry
standards for the communications systems so that when the ILS interfaces with each
generator via this network, every component must match.
Droop control systems may be designed to mitigate some of the inherent system
problems by using a reactive load sharing (RLS) control system. (Also known as
reactive droop compensation; Figure 3.) Each generator will have a current transformer
that allows the control system to proportion the load provided to the system by each
generator. Thus, if the total load on the system is 50% of system capacity, then each
generator will supply one-half of its respective full load current to the system.
The RLS still has a wider voltage regulation range than an individual isochronous
generator because the individual generator will be in the 1% range for voltage
regulation while the RLS may be as high as 4%. Since the voltage regulation is
measured from no load to full load, the system load will have a droop closer to 2%
(with 50% loading).
Cross-current compensation
To improve the generator system voltage regulation, the RLS may be modified to a
control system referred to as cross-current compensation (CCC). With CCC, changes in
the load do not affect the steady state voltage, which dramatically improves the system
voltage regulation. (Figure 4)
For the CCC system to operate properly, all of the voltage regulators must be the same
because the load feedback from one generator adjusts the speed of another unit, not the
unit from which the feedback is derived (which results in calling it a cross-current
system).
In conclusion, selection of the right load-sharing control system depends on the sizes of
the generators, their governors and voltage regulators, the sensitivity of the loads to
voltage and frequency, and desired system reliability. The engineer must consider all of
these factors during the design and specification process. This will assure that the
system will operate correctly, provide the necessary voltage and frequency stability, and
have the generators share their proportion of the total load.
Lovorn is president of Lovorn Engineering Assocs. and a member of the ConsultingSpecifying Engineer editorial advisory board. Divine is project manager and electrical
engineer at Smith Seckman Reid Inc.