Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: Marginalized people have little control over their lives which makes them handicap in delving
contribution to society. They are prevented from participating in local life, which in turn leads to further
isolation. It has a tremendous impact on development of human life, as well as on society at large. In this paper,
we have systematically reviewed the scientific literature on marginalization, its nature, types of marginalization,
marginalized groups and then we have focused on one marginalized group who suffer from HIV/AIDS related
stigma. We have highlighted promising strategies to address stigma related issues. We have focused on the
following key challenges: defining and reducing HIV/AIDS related stigma as well as assessing the impact of
stigma on the effectiveness of HIV prevention and treatment programs. Based on the literature and personal
observation we have concluded by offering a set of recommendations that may represent important next steps
that how can we bring this marginalized group into national stream through communication.
I.
Introduction
The term 'marginalization' describes the overt actions or tendencies of human societies, where people
who they perceive to objectionable or without useful function are excluded, i.e., marginalized. The people who
are marginalized are outside the existing systems of protection and integration. This limits their opportunities
and means for survival. The term has been defined in the different ways:
Merriam-Webster's online dictionary defines the term, marginalize , is "to consign to an insignificant,
or powerless position within a society or group".Laitin describes that marginality is demeaning for economic
growth, human dignity and for physical security. Marginalized people face irrevocable discrimination by
members of dominant society.These definitions are mentioned in different contexts, and show that
marginalization is a slippery and multilayered concept. To further clarify the meaning and concept we will
discuss certain features of marginalization.
Sometimes, whole societies can be marginalized at national and global levels, while classes and
communities can be marginalized from the dominant social order within the local level. In some other contexts,
the same community can be marginalized in certain country (Jews in Germany or Russia) whereas they are not
marginalized in another country (Jews in the U.S.A.).
Marginalization also increases or decreases at certain stages of life cycle. For example, the
marginalized status of children and youth may decrease as they get older; the marginalized status of adults may
increase as they become older; the marginalized status of single mother may change as their children grow up.
Individuals or groups might enjoy high social status at some point of time, but as social change takes place, they
may lose this status and become marginalized.
Thus, marginalization is a complex as well as shifting phenomenon linked to social status. The purpose
of this paper is to describe marginalization and to propose a new conceptual framework to help inform thinking
about the processes of stigma & discrimination, about the way these processes relate to HIV/AIDS, and about
potential interventions to address stigma & discrimination and minimize their impact through communication.
To do this, the paper: i. describes the nature and types of marginalization. ii. Defines marginalized groups. iii.
Analyzes the sources of Stigma & Discrimination and, its consequences. iv. Proposes an agenda for bringing
this marginalized group into national stream through communication.
Nature of Marginalization
Marginalization is a multidimensional, multi causal, historical phenomenon. There are no general laws
to understand and comprehend the complex nature of marginalization. The analytical tools that can be used in
most cases include class, in relation to specific social, cultural, economic and political conditions, as well as
ideological systems, social awareness, and human action. The nature of marginalization varies in different
settings for example, the marginalization of women in India is not the same as Iraq, though they broadly share
some features. The religious, ideological system, political economy of a country, and the overall social system
have an impact on the marginalization of specific groups or an individual.
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20117882
www.iosrjournals.org
78 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
79 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
80 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
81 | Page
II.
Conclusion
Marginalization is a complex phenomenon which is link to social status. Marginalized people are
largely deprived of social opportunities. There are several marginalized groups and people living with
HIV/AIDS also one of them. HIV/AIDS related stigma and discrimination is considered a major barrier to
effective responses to the HIV epidemic. Yet, there is little or no consensus among policy makers and
intervention program implementers about how to define measure and diminish this phenomenon. This paper
argues that we need a new way of understanding about stigma related intervention programs and through
communication we can bring marginalized population into national stream.
For marginalized communities, increased community empowerment through access to information,
improved networking and opportunities for women, access to medical information for isolated communities and
new employment opportunities are only a few of the examples that have bolstered the belief that these
technologies have a key role to play in the development of these communities.While the work described in this
paper doesnt claim to offer the last word on the above mentioned matters, it does highlight a series of practical
steps that can be taken in programming, policy and research.
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
[19].
[20].
[21].
[22].
[23].
[24].
[25].
[26].
[27].
AFAO (Australian Federation of AIDS Organizations). 1997. Human rights: from policy to practice, National AIDS Bulletin
11(5):28-29.
Aggleton, P. and I. Warwick. 1999. Household and Community Responses to HIV and AIDS in Developing Countries: Findings
from Multi-site Studies: Geneva, UNAIDS.
Bharat, S. and P. Aggleton. 1999. Facing the challenge: Household responses to AIDS in India, AIDS Care 11:33-46.
Byrne, L. 1992. Health risks of Rios street children, British Medical Journal 304:1459-50.
Crocker, S. 2003. The Fogo Process: Participatory Communication in a Globalizing World in Shirley White (ed) Participatory
Video: Images that Transform and Empower. Sage Publications, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, London.
.Daniel, H. and R. Parker. 1993. Sexuality, Politics and AIDS in Brazil. London: Falmer Press.
De Bruyn, T. (1999) HIV/AIDS and discrimination 2. Stigma and discrimination: definitions and concepts. Ottawa, Canadian
HIV/AIDS Legal Network and the Canadian AIDS Society.
Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: notes on the management of a spoiled identity. New York, Simon and Schuster.
Gilmore, N. and M.A. Somerville. 1994. Stigmatisation, scapegoating and discrimination in sexually transmitted diseases,
overcoming them and us, Social Science and Medicine 39:1339- 1358.
Kanbur, Ravi. (2007), Conceptualizing Economic Marginalization, (Key-notes for the Living at the Margins Conference Cape
Town, March 26, 2007), www.people.cornell.edu/pages.
Kegeles, S.M., Coates, T.J., Christopher, T.A. & Lazarus, J.L. (1989) Perceptions of AIDS, the continuing saga of AIDS-related
stigma, AIDS, 3 (suppl.1):S253-S258.
Malcolm, A. et al. 1998. HIV and AIDS-related stigmatization and discrimination: its form and contexts, Critical Public Health
8(4):347-370.
McGrath, J.W. (1992) the biological impact of social responses to the AIDS epidemic, Medical Anthropology, 15:63-79.
Mejia, M. (1988) SIDA, historias extraordinarias de siglo XX. In: Gavan Diaz, F., ed. El SIDA en Mxico, los efectos sociales.
Mexico City, Mexico, Universidad Autnoma Metropolitana.
Misra, S. 1999. Social discrimination and rejection in Cambodia, posting to SEA-AIDS, Tue, 29 Jun 1999.
Murshed. Marlsoob (ed.) (2002), Globalization, Marginalization, and Development, London, New York: Routledge.
Mpundu, M. 1999. Ignorance, denial, fear and violence: stigmatisation and discrimination in African communities-Zambia,
posting to SEA-AIDS.
.Mujeeb, S. 1999. Human right violations of PLWA/HIV by their family members, posting to SEA-AIDS, Tue, 06 Jul 1999.
Omangi, H.G. (1997) Stigmatization and discrimination in the context of HIV and AIDS in Kenya, Newsletter of African Network
on Ethics, Law and HIV, 3:4-5.
PANOS. 1990. The 3rd Epidemic: Repercussions of the Fear of AIDS. London: Panos Institute.
Parker, R.G. and J. Galvo (ed.). 1996. Quebrando o Silncio: Mulheres e AIDS no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Relume-Dumar.
.Parker R.G., D. Easton, and C. Klein. 2000. Structural barriers and facilitators in HIV prevention: a review of international
research, AIDS 14(Suppl. 1):S22-S32.
Peterson, C. 1990. Prostitutes and public health services co-operate on AIDS prevention in Brazil, Hygiene 9:29-31.
Plummer, K. 1975. Sexual Stigma: An Interactionist Approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
UNAIDS. 2000. HIV and AIDS-related stigmatization, discrimination and denial: forms, contexts and determinants, research
studies from Uganda and India (prepared for UNAIDS by Peter Aggleton). Geneva, UNAIDS.
Warwick, I. et al. 1998. Household and community responses to AIDS in developing countries, Critical Public Health 8(4):291 310.
Weeks, J. 1981. Sex, Politics and Society: The Regulation of Sexuality since 1800. New York: Longman.
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20117882
www.iosrjournals.org
82 | Page