Department of Computer Sc.

& Engineering
Rubrics for training project evaluation:
Rubric #1:
a

Industry
Orientation

Identify problem
domain

Requirement
analysis and
feasibility of the
proposed work

Study of the
existing systems

Objectives of the
proposed work

Methodology of
the proposed
work

Excellent
Extensive knowledge
of all departments,
processes, products &
work culture of the
company
Detailed and extensive
explanation of the
purpose and need of
the project

Acceptable
Moderate knowledge
of departments,
processes, products &
work culture of the
company
Moderate explanation
of the purpose and
need of the project

Technical, operational
and economic aspects
of the proposed work
are properly analysed

Unacceptable
Minimal knowledge
of departments,
processes, products &
work culture of the
company
Minimal explanation
of the purpose and
need of the project

Technical, operational
and economic aspects
of the proposed work
are moderatly
analysed
Detailed and extensive Moderate explanation
explanation of the
of the specifications
specifications and the and the limitations of
limitations of the
the existing systems
existing systems
All objectives of the
Some objectives of the
proposed work are
proposed work are
well defind
well defind

Technical, operational
and economic aspects
of the proposed work
are not properly
analysed
Minimal explanation
of the specifications
and the limitations of
the existing systems

Steps to be followed
to solve the defind
problem are clearly
specified

Steps to be followed
to solve the defind
problem are not
properly specified

Steps to be followed
to solve the defind
problem are
moderately specified

Objectives of the
proposed work are
either not identified or
not well defind

Rubric #2:
a

Design
methodology

Excellent
Divison of problem
into modules

Acceptable
Partial divison of
problem into modules

Selection of good

Inappropriate

Page 1 of 3

Unacceptable
Modular approach not
adopted and design
methodology not

computing framework

c
d

Appropriate design
methodology properly
defined
Planning of
Time frame properly
specified and being
project work
followed
and team
Appropriate
structure
distribution of project
work
Formatting of
Project report is
Mid-term
according to the
Report
specified format
Description of
Appropriate
technical details
description of the
technical
requirements of the
project till mid-term
Approriate
Objectives achieved
coverage of work as per time frame

selection of
defined
computing framework
Design methodology
not properly defined
Time frame properly
specified, but not
being followed
Un-even distribution
of project work
Project report is not
fully according to the
specified format
In-sufficient
description of the
technical
requirements of the
project till mid-term
Insufficient
achievement of
objectives as per time
frame

Time frame not

properly specified
In-appropriate
distribution of project
work
Project report not
prepared according to
the specified format
Poor description of
the technical
requirements of the
project till mid-term
Objectives not
achieved as per time
frame

Rubric #3:
A Project
Execution

Presentation

Excellent
All defined objectives
are achieved
Each module working
well and properly
demonstrated
All modules of project
are well integrated and
system working is
satisfactory
Contents of
presentations are
appropriate and well
delivered
Proper eye contact
with audience and
clear voice with good
spoken language

Acceptable
Unacceptable
Some of the defined
Defined objectives
objectives are
are not achieved
achieved
Modules are not in
Modules are working
proper working form
well in isolation and
properly demonstrated that further leads to
failure of integrated
Modules of project
system
are not properly
integrated
Contents of
presentations are not
appropriate
Eye contact with few
people and cleat
voice with good
spoken language

Page 2 of 3

Contents of
presentations are not
appropriate and not
well delivered
Poor delivery of
presentation

Rubric #4:
a
b

Excellent
Acceptable
Formatting of
Project report is
Project report is not
project report
according to the
fully according to the
specified format
specified format
Description of
Complete explanation Explanation of the key
concepts and
of the key concepts
concepts with little
technical details Strong description of
relevant literature
In-sufficient
the technical
requirements of the
description of the
project
technical
requirements of the
project
Conclusions and Results are presented Results are presented
Discussion
in very appropriate
in good manner
manner
Project work is not
Project work is well
well summerised and
summerised and
concluded
concluded
Future extensions in
Future extensions in
the project are
the project are well
specified
specified
Blog
Blog well maintained Blog maintained but
on daily basis
not complete

Page 3 of 3

Unacceptable
Project report not
prepared according to
the specified format
Inapproiate
explanation of the
key concepts
Poor description of
the technical
requirements of the
project
Results are not
presented properly
Project work is not
summerised and
concluded
Future extensions in
the project are not
specified
Blog not maintained