Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ELSEVIER
Journal of Petroleum
ofGeology and Geophysics, The University of Calgaary.Calgary, Alberta T2N IN4, Canada
Received22 September1994;accepted22 September1994
Abstract
Investigation of the relationships between two-dimensional pore geometrical data, from image analysis of thin sections, and
initial water saturation, measured by conventional laboratory techniques on core plugs, reveals that the volumes of small pores
within the pore space have strong influences on initial water saturation. A North American and a North Sea reservoir were
investigated and empirical models specific to each reservoir show that 72% and 73% of the variance in initial water saturation
can be explained by image data. The average amount that estimated initial water saturation differs from the experimentally
measured initial water saturation is + 3% and f 3.5%, respectively, for the two reservoirs.
It is also shown that the negative relationship between porosity or permeability and initial water saturation, which commonly
have been used for prediction of saturation, are not universal but depend on the degree of pore size variation. Significant negative
relationships between permeability and initial water saturation occur for rocks with relatively uniform pore systems but different
pore sizes. For rocks with varying degrees of non-uniform pore systems, quantitative determination of pore structure is essential
in order to estimate initial water saturation.
The porosity classification technique used in this study is shown to be useful for determining the pore geometrical parameters
which are significant for the prediction of initial water saturation. This technique could be used to evaluate initial water saturations
of larger numbers of samples including samples too small for conventional testing.
1. Introduction
Initial water saturation occurs during the immiscible
displacement of water by another fluid (oil or gas) in
a porous medium. The mechanism of immiscible fluid
displacement involves capillary action. The amount of
water (as a wetting phase) removed from a porous
medium is related to externally applied pressure and
can be illustrated with a capillary pressure drainage
curve (Fig. 1). The pressure required to remove the
* Correspondingauthor.
0920-4105/95/$09.50
0 1995
SSDIO920-4105(94)00051-4
296
S.B. Coskun, N. C. Wardlaw /Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 12 (1995) 295-308
are relatively easy to measure and more widely available, to estimate Swiof reservoir rocks (Amyx et al.,
1960; Buckles, 1965; Morrow et al., 1969; Chilingarian
and Yen, 1987). Although, in general, there are negative relationships between these parameters and Swi,
porosity and permeability do not always correlate well
with S,i.
Pore properties have a major effect on S,i. Quantitative pore geometrical data have been difficult to
obtain and many workers have used qualitative or semiquantitative petrographic data obtained from thin sections (grain size, framework mineral composition and
diagenetic minerals) to understand the effects of pore
geometry on the entrapment of water in reservoir rocks
(Morrow, 1970, 1971; Morgan and Gordon, 1970;
Wardlaw and Cassan, 1978). Through recent advances
in computer based image analysis of rock samples, it
is now possible to quantify the two dimensional (2-D)
aspects of pore geometry rapidly and effectively by
Petrographic Image Analysis (PIA) (Ehrlich et al.,
1984, 1991a).
A pore system is a three-dimensional network of
spaces which consists of individual pores connected
through constrictions or throats. In a 2-D slice of a rock
impregnated with colored epoxy, a pore system appears
as discrete areas that have been referred to as porosity
elements, or porels (Ehrlich et al., 1991a). Porels
Fig. 2. Capillary pressure drainage curves for two samples with the
same initial water saturation but significantly different pore throat
sizes. The Curve-l represent a coarser grained sample with large
pore sizes. Curve-2 represents a finer grained sample with smaller
pore sizes. initial water saturation is 13.3% for Curve- 1 and 20.5%
for Curve-2 at a capillary pressure A.
2. Methods
Sandstone core plugs were vacuum impregnated
with blue-dyed epoxy and thin sections were prepared.
The thin sections were digitized using an ARIES-II
Image analyzer and an EIKONIX camera. Images were
produced at a resolution of 5 mm per pixel. The size of
the imaged view for each sample was 3290 X 1500 pixels ( 1.6 X 0.75 centimeters). Binary images segmenting porous and non-porous areas were created based
on light intensities. The Erosion-Dilation (E-D) algorithm of Petrographic Image Analysis (PIA) (Ehrlich
et al., 1991a) was used to generate quantitative size
and shape data from porels in each thin section. Successive iterations of the E-D process were used to produce three pore1 size distributions; ( 1) total pore1 size;
291
(2) smooth pore1 size; and (3) rough pore1 size. The
smooth pore1 size is approximately equal to the area of
the maximum inscribed circle for most porels. The
remaining part of the pore1 is termed the rough pore1
area. The total of smooth and rough pore1 areas is the
total pore1 area. The ratio of total pore1 area to total
digitized area is a measure of optical porosity and is
termed Image Porosity. The smooth portions of
porels give size information, and the ratio of smooth to
rough porosity and the scale of rough porosity carry
shape and connectivity information. Each pore1 has a
single size for the smooth component but may have
many sizes for the rough components.
Porosity observed in thin sections was objectively
classified using a pattern recognition algorithm of PIA
(Ehrlich et al., 1991a). In PIA, porosity is classified
into several pore types defined by characteristic distributions of sizes and shapes present in the thin sections.
The classification procedure is based on Q-Mode factor
analysis using smooth and rough pore1 size distributions. The number of pore types represents compositionally the most distinct pores (in terms of size and
shape) within the analyzed samples and the pore structure of each sample is explained in terms of the proportions of these pore types. A detailed explanation of
the porosity classification procedure and its theoretical
basis can be found in Ehrlich et al. (1984, 1991a) and
Full et al. ( 1981, 1982, 1984).
In order to understand the effects of rock properties
on the trapping of water and to develop a statistical
model to estimate initial water saturations from pore
structure, all factors other than rock properties must be
constant. Initial water saturations in both data sets were
obtained using an ultracentrifuge under oil. The core
handling, core aging, temperature, fluid properties (oil
and water) and pressure during the centrifuge treatments were similar for all experiments within each data
set. The maximum capillary pressure achieved during
the ultracentrifugal rotation was 520 kilopascals and
the initial water saturation measurements were obtained
at this pressure for all samples.
The NA sandstones were determined as slightly
water wet, whereas the NS sandstones were determined
as mixed wet, by the operating oil companies, based on
the results of AMOIT tests.
Regression analysis was used to establish empirical
relationships between measured initial water saturations and pore geometrical parameters by using SPSS /
298
S.B. Coskun. N.C. Wardlaw / Journal ojPetroleum Science and Engineering I2 (1995) 295-308
generally
of porosity, permeability
of initial water
Mean
St. deviation
Minimum
Maximum
characteristics
of kaolinite
spar and other unstable or soluble grains is very extensive in some samples. The mineral composition, type
Table 1
Distribution
minor amounts
4(B)
log, k (mD)
s,, (%)
4(B)
log, k (mD)
SW, (%)
18.0
5.0
6.4
28.4
5.65
1.80
0.74
8.30
14.0
5.0
6.2
25.3
21.0
2.0
15.8
24.7
6.85
1.51
4.28
9.13
14.0
6.0
2.7
24.8
C#I
= core measured porosity (percentage)
(millidarcy)
S.B. Coskun, N.C. Wardlaw / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 12 (1995) 295-308
299
PT.1
PT-2
PT-3
PT-4
.I
454
-;:.
.
PT.5
iid
Y
PT-7
Fig. 3. Smooth and rough pore1 size spectra and binary images of seven pore types for the North American Sandstones. Darker bars represent
smooth pore1 size distribution and the patterned bars represent the rough pore1 size distribution for each pore type. Numbers are the largest pore1
diameter (n X 10 Fm) associated with each bin. See Table 2 for the average size, petrographic description and occurrence of the pore types.
300
Table 2
Porosity classification
Petrographic
sandstones
description
and occurrence
(pm)
I (PTI)
2(PT2)
24
38
3 (PT3)
54
4 (PT4)
77
5 (PTS)
104
6 (PT6)
208
7(PT7)
211
Small, isolated pores in tightly carbonate cemented sandstones. Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio = O.SO/O.SO.
Small intergranular pores in finer grained sandstones and in poorly sorted coarse grained sandstones. Smooth
to rough pore1 area ratio = 0.56/0.44.
Extremely well connected small to medium pores. Most common in fine to medium grained sandstones and is
developed where the early carbonate cementation prevented grain compaction,and where the subsequent
dissolution of carbonates created well connected channel-type pores. Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio = 0.09/
0.91.
Intermediate size, intergranular pores. Most common in well consolidated, well sorted, medium grained
sandstones. Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio = 0.66/0.43.
Well connected, intermediate-size intergranular pores in loosely consolidated, medium to coarse grained
sandstones. Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio = 0.20/0.80.
Large, poorly connected moldic pores. Most abundant in carbonate-cemented,
coarse grained sandstones.
Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio = 0.61/0.39.
Large, well connected, secondary-intergranular
pores related to dissolution of carbonate and unstable grains.
Most common in coarse grained, poorly sorted sandstones. Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio=0.33/0.67.
4. Pore variables
Porosity of the NA and NS sandstones were classified using PIA and the resulting proportions of pore
types were used in regression analysis to assess the
relative importance of pore geometrical variables in
controlling SWi. In addition to the proportions of pore
types, the following global pore geometrical variables
(defined as variables which have single values for each
sample) were used as independent variables in the
regression analyses. These variables are:
( 1) The fraction of core porosity not accounted for
by image analysis (&). This parameter is calculated
using the formula:
4f=(+c_4i)/4r
(1)
5. Quantitative characterization
of pore structure
S.B. Coskun, N.C. Wardlaw / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 12 (1995) 295-308
301
PT-1
PT-2
1s
_.._._.._
- _ _ __
- ._..
so
2s
---
*0
-.-._-
IS
-.-.-
.____. -_--.-.._
- ..-
---.-._
PT-4
r41:
--.-
10
I
0
4 t l,azsa
a ,
6 ,
._._.._
_ _.._.
-.--.._.__-.._.._.
- ._._
._._.
-._._.._.._
_.-.-._,___.._.
-._._
---._ -.-._._
----.--._.._.
-- _
.._.._..-.--.._.__
- ._-.
1 IJun
1 2
PT-5
Fig. 4. Smooth and rough pore1 size spectra and binary images of five pore types for the North Sea Sandstones. Darker bars represent smooth
pore1 size distribution and the patterned bars represent the rough pore1 size distribution for each pore type. Numbers are the largest pore1 diameter
(n X 10 pm) associated with each bin. See Table 3 for the average size, petrographic description and occurrence of the pore types.
302
S.B. Coskun, N.C. Wardlaw/ Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 12 (1995) 295-308
Table 3
Porosity classification
Petrographic
description
and occurrence
(pm)
1 (PTI)
2 (PT2)
38
Small, intergranularpores in fine grained sandstones. Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio=O.43/0.56.
14
3 (PT3)
172
4 (PT4)
206
5 (PT5)
299
Small to intermediate-size, interganular pores. Most common in finer grained sandstones. Smooth to rough
pore1 area ratio = 0.22/0.78.
Intermediate to large size, intergranular pores. Most common in laminated sandstones. Smooth to rough pore1
area ratio = 0.30/0.70.
Large, well connected, intergranular pores in coarse grained sandstones. Smooth to rough pore1 area
ratio = 0.35/0.64.
Very large, well connected pores. Most common in loosely consolidated conglomeratic sandstones and
conglomerates. Smooth to rough pore1 area ratio = 0.39/0.61.
have the determining influence on the pore type classification and the size of a pore type is not necessarily
related to grain size. For instance, Pore Type- 1 ( PTI ) ,
which is the smallest pore type, is associated with carbonate cement and occurs most commonly in tightly
cemented, coarse grained sandstones. On the other
hand, Pore Type-3 (PT,) and Pore Type-7 (PT,) are
closely related to the grain size but are the results of
the dissolution of carbonate cement in both finer
Table 4
Correlation coefficients (r) between initial water saturations and 2D image data-porosity-permeability
for the 30 North American sandstones and 16 North Sea sandstones
Variables
PT,
PT>
PT,
PT,
PTs
PT,
PT,
4,
&I
SR
HR
4
lo&. k
North American
0.57**
0.11
- 0.39
-0.59**
-0.24
-0.11
-0.23
0.49
0.53
-0.08
- 0.07
- 0.43 *
- 0.5 I *
data set
pore
303
Table 5
Statistics for the regression analysis between 2-D image data and initial water saturations for the North American and North Sea data sets
Data set
North American
Notth Sea
Number of samples
30
16
Coefficient of determination
(r?
(s)
0.72
0.73
0.030
0.035
16.25
18.01
0.0000
0.0002
F= F-value for the F-scatisric; LY= significance level for the F-statistic
Kviw,4,=0.13+0.25(PT,)
-0.46(PT,)
+1.26(&J
swi(N!)
-0.023+0.25(PT,)
+0.12($,)
+2.10(#~&
(2)
(3)
1- 3~0%b(Swi(NA)(uue))
Swi(NS)(estimate)
= f3.5%(Swi(NS)ftme~)
(4)
(5)
The average S,i for the NA sandstones and NS sandstones are both 14% (Table 1) . The analyses of residuals in both regressions indicate that variance of errors
are uniform, and that errors are normally distributed.
Durbin-Watson d-statistic (Younger, 1979) indicates
that the errors in both regression analyses are independent at the significance level of 0.0 1. Figs. 5 and 6
show the cross plots between measured and estimated
S,i values for the NA and NS sandstones, respectively.
7. Discussion
304
of Petroleum
Science and
Engineering I2 (1995)295-308
and initial
Permeability (k) is directly proportional to the effective pore radius squared and capillary pressure is
inversely proportional to pore radius. Inasmuch as wetting phase saturation decreases as capillary pressure
increases, a negative relationship between k and water
saturation (Swi) is not surprising for rocks with relatively uniform pore systems but differing pore sizes.
However, if significant volumes of small pores or
microporosity are present in a rock, the effect on k may
be small but the effect on SW;is likely to be large. Thus,
the relationship between k and S,i for rocks with varying degree of non-uniform pore systems can be weak.
The pore systems in the rocks of the NA reservoir
have been affected by differences in grain sorting, varying mineral compositions,
variable compaction
effects, and complex diagenetic events in varying
degrees. As a result, the relationships between k and
SWi are weak for the 30 samples (correlation coefficients (r) = - 0.5 1; Fig. 7; Table 4). Indeed, the exclusion of three samples from the data set (the three
samples which have k of less than 10 mD in Fig. 7),
causes r for the remaining 27 samples to fall to - 0.08.
The three excluded samples are tightly cemented,
coarse grained sandstones. Their porosity consists
mainly of small pores (PT, and PT,) . Consequently,
their & is higher and permeabilities are lower than the
other sandstones of the set. The remaining 27 samples
are not tightly cemented and have differing degrees of
grain size sorting, diagenesis and dissolution. In other
words, there is large variability of pore types among
28%T
;25;
_*
.P
;;23L
'
3
_
220-
.
.
.
.
l
.L
. .
4 RA
Permeability
(md)
Fig. 7. Cross plot between k and & for the 30 NA Sandstones. The
correlation coefficient (r) is 0.52 for all samples and is - 0.08 for
the 27 samples with k higher than 10 mD.
25SC
.620-
z
%
m15-
.
~.
305
Porosity
(W)
Porosity
Range
30Sk
I
1000
100
Permeability
10000
(md)
19-24
.o
F
I%
= 25-0
Group-l
120-
CE
.
.
;154
,j lo.c
c
u
Y
Group-2
*.
.
.
.
' Group-3
5-
2
$
r
15
~"~,"~~,JI~~/JIII,IJII/
17
Pokity
23
25
!A)
Fig. 10. Cross plot between 4 and S,, for the 16 NS Sandstones. The
correlation coefficient (r) is - 0.26. Groups 1.2 and 3 are arbitrarily
chosen to represent rocks with high, intermediate and low S,,,,,respectively. Distribution of smaller and larger pore types for rocks having
porosity range between 19 and 24% are determined for each group
(see Table 6).
S.B. Coskun, N.C. Wardlaw /Journal @Petroleum Science and Engineering 12 (1995) 295-308
306
Table 6
Distributions of smaller (PT, and PTz) and larger pore types (FT,and PT5) for the NS sandstones having C#J
between 19% and 24% and from
SW,groups of I, 2 and 3 shown in Fig. IO. The average 4 of samples from the three groups are almost equal, whereas proportional volumes of
smaller pores increase and those of larger pores decrease with increasing S,i for the three groups *
Number of samples
Group- I
Group-2
Group-3
4
4
4
Mean I#J
Mean S,,
(%o)
(%)
(%)
(%)
21
22
22
21
12
06
69
40
35
24
38
49
Group-l includes the samples with S,, more than 15% of pore volume. Group-2 includes the samples with S,, between 8% and 14.99% of pore
volume. Group-3 includes the samples with S,, less than 8% of pore volume.
8. Conclusions
( 1) Petrographic Image Analysis (PIA) is used to
characterize the pore structures of two reservoir sandstones (a North American (NA) and a North Sea (NS)
oil reservoir) using two-dimensional thin section data.
Pore systems of each reservoir are defined by pore types
which have characteristic sizes and shapes. Seven pore
types for the NA reservoir and five pore types for the
NS reservoir are necessary to capture the pore characteristics.
S.B. Coskun. N.C. Wardlaw / Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 12 (1995) 295-308
(2) The regression analysis between two-dimensional pore geometrical data and core measured initial
water saturation (S,i), which is defined as water saturation at a constant, high capillary pressure, indicates
that initial water saturation is closely related to the
volumes of small pores. Increasing volumes of small
pores within the pore space increases initial water saturation for samples from both reservoirs.
(3) Empirical regression models, specific to each
reservoir, explain 72% and 73% of variations in initial
water saturations for the NA and NS reservoirs, respectively. Both reservoirs have mean values of Swi of
= 14% and the average amount that actual S,i values
differ from the estimated average S,i is 3% and 3.5%
for the NA and NS reservoirs, respectively.
(4) Negative relationships between permeability
(k) and & are not universal as is commonly assumed.
Permeability can be a significant parameter for S,i prediction only where rocks have relatively uniform pore
systems but differing average pore sizes. In such cases,
k values provide an index for the relative pore size
differences among a suite of rocks. Rocks with low k
have smaller pores and larger Swi.As a result, a negative
relationship can occur between k and Swi,as is the case
for the NS reservoir. For rocks with varying degree of
non-uniform pore systems with relatively large, continuous flow channels and variable volumes of microporosity, k is affected by the large flow channels which
do not indicate the relative abundance of small pores
and no relationship between k and S,i exists. This is
the case for the NA reservoir. For these sandstones,
information about the volume of small pores within the
pore space is essential for the estimation OfS,i and PIA
provides a quantitative and efficient method to obtain
this information.
(5) Relationships between porosity (4) and S,i are
weak for both reservoir sandstones because variation
in 4 does not indicate the overall pore size differences
or the degree of non-uniformity of pore systems among
a suite of samples. Rocks with dominantly large pores
may have similar 4 but significantly lower Swi than
rocks with dominantly smaller pores. The information
about the distribution of small and large pore types
within the rocks is more important for S,i prediction
than the information about the total void space (porosity).
301
Acknowledgements
References
Amyx, J.W., Bass, D.M. and Whiting, R.L., 1960. Petroleum Reservoir Engineering. McGraw-Hill, Toronto, Ont., 610 pp.
Beard, DC. and Weyl, P.K., 1973. Influence of texture on porosity
and permeability of unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bull., 57(2):
349-369.
Bonnie, J.H.M. and Fens, T.W., 1992. Porosity and permeability
from SEM based image analysis of core materials. SPE Pap.
23619:4558, presented at 2nd SPE Latin American Petroleum
Engineering Conference, Caracas, Venezuela, March 8-l 1.
Buckles, R.S., 1965. Correlating and averaging connate water saturation data. J. Can. Pet. Technol., 4: 42-52.
Chilingarian, G.V. and Yen, T.F., 1987. Note on carbonate rocks,
No. 5: Interrelationship among various properties of carbonates.
Energy Sources, 9( 1): 51-65.
Coskun, S.B. and Wardlaw, N.C., 1993. Estimation of permeability
from image analysis of reservoir sandstones. J. Pet. Sci. Eng.,
10: 1-16.
Coskun, S.B., Wardlaw, N.C. and Haverslew, B., 1993. Effects of
composition, texture and diagenesis on porosity. permeability
and oil recovery in a sandstone reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 8:
219-292.
Ehrlich, R., Crabtree, S.J., Kennedy, SK. and Cannon, R.L.,1984.
Petrographic image analysis I-analysis of reservoir pore complexes. J. Sediment. Petrol., 54(4): 1365-1378.
Ehrlich, R., Crabtme, S.J., Horkowitz, K.O. and Horkowitz, J.P.,
1991a. Petrography and reservoir physics I: Objective classification of reservoir porosity. AAPG Bull., 75( 10): 1547-1562.
Ehrlich, R., Etris, E.L., Brumfield, D.S., Yuan, L.P. and Crabtree
S.J., 1991b. Petrography and reservoir physics III: Physical models for permeability and formation factor. AAPG Bull., 75( 10):
1579-1592.
Etris, E.L., 1991. Investigations into the control of pore/throat structure on capillary pressure imbibition, and its relevance to resistivity index and relative permeability in reservoir rocks. Ph.D.
diss., Univ. South Carolina, 338 pp.
Full, W.E., Ehrlich, R. and Klovan, J.E., 1981. EXTENDED QMODEL-objective definition of external end members in the analysis of mixtures. Math. Geol., 13(4): 331-344.
Full, W.E., Ehrlich, R. and Bezdek, J.C., 1982. FUZZY QMODEL
- a new approach for linear unmixing. Math. Geol., 14(3):
259-270.
308
ojPetroleum
Full. W.E., Ehrlich, R. and Kennedy, S.K., 1984. Optimal configuration and information
and reservoir physics If: Relating thin section porosity to capillary pressure. AAPG Bull., 75( 10): 1563-1578.
Morgan, J.T. and Gordon,
on water-oil
relative
J. Pet. Technol.,
22( 10):
1199-1208.
Morrow, N.R., Huppler, I.D. and Simmons, A.B.111, 1969. Porosity
and permeability
of unconsolidated,
porous
12 (1995) 295-308
in porous
sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bull., 55 (3):5 14-522.
SPSS/PC+,
1988. SPSS/PC+
V2 Base Manual: SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., 605 pp.
Tjolsen, C.B., Scheie, A. and Damsleth, E., 1991. A study of the
correlation between relative permeability, air permeability and
depositional environment on the core-plug scale. Presented at
EROCAS II, London.
Wardlaw, N.C. and Cassan, J.P., 1978. Estimation of recovery efficiency by visual observation of pore systems in reservoir rocks,
Bull. Can. Pet. Geol., 26(4): 572-585.
Weibel, E.R., 1979. Stereological Methods, Vol. Il. Theoretical
Foundations. Academic Press, London, 430 pp.
Younger, M.S., 1979. A Handbook for Linear Regression, Duxbury
Press, Massachusetts, 569 pp.