Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
MARTIN GRUNIN,
Defendant.
16
17
18
I.
The Court has entered default judgment against defendant Martin Grunin per an order
19
20
21
22
23
24
Introduction
issued on January 8, 2014 (Order). (Dkt. No. 76.) Pursuant to the Order, plaintiff Facebook,
Inc. now submits this brief and the accompanying sworn declarations of Mat Henley and Judith
B. Jennison identifying the claimed damages and fees sought in its Complaint and Motion for
Default Judgment.
II.
Compensatory Damages
25
A.
Breach of Contract
26
Facebook seeks damages for Grunins breach of contract. See Order at 5 (finding Grunin
27
liable for breach of contract). For the breach of an obligation arising from contract, the measure
28
-1LEGAL124730947.6
of damages . . . is the amount which will compensate the party aggrieved for all the detriment
proximately caused thereby, or which, in the ordinary course of things, would be likely to result
therefrom. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code 3300. Damages for breach of contract must be certain. Cal.
Civ. Proc. Code 3301 (No damages can be recovered for a breach of contract which are not
Grunin purchased but for which he has not paid. (Compl. 53, 63); Henley Decl. 10 and
Exhibit C. (This sum does not include the costs for ads purchased under the Thinkmodo and
Imprezzio Marketing accounts referenced in the Complaint. (Compl. 10.) These amounts are
10
11
12
as its internal costs of identifying and terminating his fake and compromised accounts, and of
13
documenting his breaches for preparation of the Complaint. Facebook also suffered damage to its
14
relationships with users and business partners as a result of Grunins ads that violated the
15
Advertising Guidelines. However, to avoid a lengthy submission to the Court, Facebook has
16
17
B.
18
Facebook seeks damages for Grunins fraud. See Order at 6 (finding Grunin liable for
Fraud
19
fraud against Facebook). Facebook may recover the actual, out-of-pocket damages it suffered
20
as a result of Grunins fraudulent behavior. Auble v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 55 F. Supp. 2d 1019,
21
1022 (N.D. Cal. 1999). These damages are measured as the amount which will compensate for
22
all the detriment proximately caused [by the defendants fraud], whether it could have been
23
anticipated or not. Therefore, damages are measured as the actual losses suffered because of
24
the misrepresentation. Auble, 55 F. Supp. 2d at 1022. Facebook has identified the following
25
26
27
28
-2LEGAL124730947.6
2
3
C.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
18 U.S.C. 1030 et seq. (CFAA), and the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access
and Fraud Act, Cal. Penal Code 502. See Order at 9 (finding Grunin liable for claims under
both statutes). Under the CFAA, Facebook is entitled to recover any loss it has incurred as a
result of Grunins violating behavior. See, e.g., AtPac, Inc. v. Aptitude Solutions, Inc., 730 F.
Supp. 2d 1174, 1185 (E.D. Cal. 2010). These losses include impairment of or damage to the
computer system that was accessed without authorization, and the costs associated with
assessing a hacked system for damage [and] upgrading a systems defenses to prevent future
unauthorized access. Id.; see also Multiven, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., 725 F. Supp. 2d 887, 89495
(N.D. Cal. 2010) (Costs associated with investigating intrusions into a computer network and
taking subsequent remedial measures are losses within the meaning of the statute.); PNC Mortg.
v. Superior Mortg. Corp., No. CIV.A. 09-5084, 2012 WL 627995, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2012).
Under Cal. Penal Code 502, Facebook is similarly entitled to damages resulting from loss
associated with Grunins unlawful behavior. See Cal. Penal Code 502(e)(1).
Facebook seeks $8,516.50 in pre-litigation attorneys fees associated with investigating
19
20
Mr. Grunins activities and sending him cease and desist letters. (Jennison Decl. 68.) 1
In sum, Facebook requests a total of $513,432.91 in compensatory damages for breach of
21
22
23
24
25
Facebook seeks damages for Grunins violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,
5
6
Punitive Damages
Facebook is also entitled to punitive damages for Grunins fraud. See Cal Code Civ. Proc.
3294(a) (for claim of fraud, in addition to the actual damages, [a plaintiff] may recover
26
27
28
Facebook would also be entitled to recover the $116,067.41 for the Thinkmodo ads and
$300,032.49 for the Imprezzio Marketing ads as damages for the CFAA/ 502 claims, but does not include
them here because they are already included as damages for Grunins fraud.
-3LEGAL124730947.6
damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant.). Facebook is also
entitled to punitive and exemplary damages under Cal. Penal Code 502(e)(4) because Grunins
violation included fraudulent behavior. Cal. Penal Code 502(e)(4) (citing Cal Code Civ. Proc.
3294).
Facebook does not know how much money Grunin made as a result of his unlawful
activities (though it was likely significant given the civil and criminal risks Grunin took to get it).
We do know that before this lawsuit was filed, Grunin routinely bragged on the Internet about his
wealth. As set forth in detail in Facebooks Opposition to Motion to Set Aside Default, Dkt. No.
47, Grunin has publicly stated that money drives [him] completely. Opp. to Mot. to Set Aside
10
Default at 4. Grunin boasted about purchasing a luxury automobile with cash, keeping a BMW as
11
an everyday car, and has posted photos of his Rolex watch, boat, and high-end vacations. Id. at
12
45.
Without knowing how much money Grunin made from his illegal activities, it is hard to
13
14
know how much will deter him from doing it again. But we know Grunin does not yet appreciate
15
the gravity of what he has done because of the way he has participated in this case. His attempts
16
to disavow the authority of the Court and hamper the effective prosecution of this case
17
demonstrate he is not taking his actions seriously. For these reasons Facebook requests punitive
18
19
seeks.
20
IV.
21
Attorneys Fees
Cal. Penal Code 502(e)(1) expressly provides for recovery of reasonable attorneys
22
fees for claims brought under Cal. Penal Code 502(c). Cal. Penal Code 502(e)(2) (In any
23
action brought pursuant to this subdivision the court may award reasonable attorneys fees.).
24
Facebook seeks its attorneys fees for work done prior to preparing and litigating the Complaint
25
as costs under the CFAA and Cal. Penal Code 502. (See Section II.B above.) This section
26
focuses on Attorneys fees sought in connection with the litigation, which includes preparing and
27
filing the Complaint, and all subsequent case administration and motion practice. Facebooks
28
-4LEGAL124730947.6
attorneys fees are more than one would expect in a typical default judgment case because this
case isnt typical: Grunins early representation by non-lawyer Robert Costello, his filing of
bogus, nonsensical documents, his attempt to set aside his default, and ultimately the entry of his
default judgment, all required much more work than if he had not appeared at all.
Facebook has incurred the following attorneys fees and costs:
$317,841.50: Perkins Coies attorneys fees associated with preparing, filing, and
918.)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
V.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, as well as those stated in the Henley Declaration, the Jennison
Declaration and in Facebooks Motion for Default Judgment and the Courts Order, Facebook
seeks $513,432.91 in compensatory damages, $500,000 in punitive damages and $326,129.11 in
attorneys fees and costs.
17
18
19
By:
20
21
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FACEBOOK, INC.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5LEGAL124730947.6