The rense.com web site had two entries on Tim Vawter's lawsuit.

This
is the second one, dated August 11, 2009
http://www.rense.com/general87/mislead.htm

Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

Misleading - Preliminary Injunction To Halt

Mandatory
Flu Vaccination In The US Has Been Issued
From Devvy Kidd
8-11-9

I try to avoid whizzing matches, but this latest post has my blood boiling
because it is so misleading. It is also being forwarded all over the Internet
as truth. My mail box has been filing up all day with Victory! because of
the article linked below.

Reading this article on Natural News.com leads people to believe there

was an injunction issued by a Federal Court when the court shows no
such action.

At the bottom is email forwarded to me with these headlines:

Preliminary Injunction to Halt Mandatory Flu Vaccination in the U.S. Has

Been Issued

http://www.naturalnews.com/026818_vaccination_vaccines_flu_vaccine.
html

"(NaturalNews) -- A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory

vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New
Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was
filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the
federal government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary
Injunction, it will stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any
state to take flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or
local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any
person who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or
constitutional rights. Vawter's filings included a Complaint, and several
pages of evidentiary Exhibits."

_______________

I can find zero proof a Priminary Injunction has been issued. Mr. Vawter
filed documents with the court, but as of three hours ago, nothing has
been issued by a judge and there has been no hearing.

I asked my friend who has been an attorney over 30 years (mostly in the
federal courts) and subscribes to PACER to obtain the docket for me so I
could verify the claims made in the Natural News piece. He said no
injunction has been issued by the court.

But, wait, what does it also say above? "When the judge signs the
Preliminary Injunction..." You can't have it both ways. "Has been issued"
and "When the judge signs" are two different things in the legal world.

Here is the only action on that case number from the court's own docket:

Date Filed # Docket Text

07/31/2009 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2

Summons, # 3

Application IFP)(eaj) # 4 Text of Proposed Order) (Entered: 07/31/2009)

07/31/2009 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction To Forbid Forced Flu

Vaccinations by

TIM VAWTER. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(eaj) (Entered:

07/31/2009)l Query l Reportsv l Utilitiesv l Logout

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

08/07/2009 3 Letter from Tim Vawter with Exhibit H. (Exhibit H is a

DVD and has been forwarded to Chambers) (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit
of Tim Vawter)(gxh)

(Entered: 08/07/2009)
Where is proof stated in the paragraphs below from the Natural News
article posted today? Where is notification of a hearing? Where is this
order signed by either Judge Joel A. Pisano or Magistrate Judge Tonianne
J. Bongiovanni? If Ms. Minton, the author of the piece, has such proof,
why wasn't it linked in her piece?

Preliminary Injunction will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations in

the U.S.

"The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read
the papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it
appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of
negligence with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the
flu vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence
submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of
the flu vaccines.

"The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing
any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that
person's free will and free choice. The government will not allow any
state or local government, or any party, to force any person to be required
to take any influenza vaccination against that person's free will and free
choice."

"It is further ordered that the government shall not deny any constitutional
rights.." What order?

According to the court's own docket, the court has heard nothing. The
court has not ordered "the government shall be forbidden...."

The last action listed on the court's docket is by Mr. Vawter on August 7,
2009. A letter forwarded by him to Chambers.

Mr. Vawter filed a set of papers requesting the court stop mandatory
vaccinations in the U.S.

There is no such requirement at this time except those covered by the

states under their mandatory programs, primarily for health care workers.
Neither the CDC, Congress, the usurper president or any other agency has
issued a mandatory vaccination order, edit, decree or otherwise for the
N1H1 flu.
I wrote a short piece about Mr. Vawter's filing and why I believe the court
will throw it out:

http://www.rense.com/general87/ss.htm

This is the direct link to the first set of documents:

http://www.wakenews.net/html/us-files.html

Both filings have been given the same case number:

District of New Jersey [LIVE] (Trenton)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:09-cv-03803-JAP-TJB

VAWTER v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

At the bottom of the Natural News piece it gives a site which has posted a
similar document, but that one is 11 pages plus two pages of exhibits
listed; it also calls for monetary damages, the original three page
submission does not.

http://www.safetylawsuits.com/complaint.html

I sent Ms. Minton an email requesting she provide copies of the court
order and hearing to substantiate her statements.

Devvy

Natural News Pulls Article - Apologizes

Preliminary Injunction to Halt Mandatory Flu Vaccination in the U.S. Has

Been Issued (correction)

(NaturalNews) Editor's Note -- It has come to our attention that the

following article is factually incorrect. It was written by a contributing
writer, then approved by an in-house editor who did not catch the
significant errors in this article. As a result of these significant errors, and
due to our commitment to publishing only true and accurate information
to the best of our ability, we have made an editorial decision to reject
further articles from this author.

NaturalNews deeply regrets this unintentional error, and we are

brainstorming new ways to put in place tighter fact-checking oversight so
that the same mistake does not happen again in the future. We thank all
those who have brought this important matter to our attention, and we
pledge to increase our efforts to reject stories that contain factual
inaccuracies. We only include the full text of the story below so that
readers may reference what the original article incorrectly stated, even
though we now know the article is factually incorrect. Thank you, - Mike
Adams, editor of NaturalNews

http://www.naturalnews.com/026818_vaccination_vaccines_flu_vaccine.
html

Disclaimer

Donate to Rense.com Subscribe To RenseRadio!

Enormous Online Archives,
Support Free And Honest
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files,
Journalism At Rense.com
Highest Quality Live Programs

MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros