Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah is the English translation of
al-maqaasid al-istiqraa'iyyah. In fact, both the original and the English
equivalent have been used interchangeably throughout the paper. This also
applies to other terms and expressions. (Translator's Note)
Dr. Noor-ud-deen Al-Khaadimee is currently professor of Jurisprudence and
its Sources in Az-Aaitunah University, Tunisia. He was formerly professor of
jurisprudence in the College of Sharee'ah in Riyadh.
Introduction
Importance of Study
The inductive goals and objectives are those goals and objectives
which have been established through induction. Induction is a process
of thought that uses known facts to produce general rules or principles.
In the domain of the goals and objectives of Islamic law (Maqaasid ashSharee'ah), it means observing the details with a view to arriving at the
inductive goals and objectives.
Therefore, the inductive goals and objectives represent a type of the
goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah, as has been explained above.
The issue of studying the inductive goals and objectives gets its
weight from the importance of studying the goals and objectives of the
Sharee'ah itself. For Muslim scholars, past and present, have shown a
great deal of interest in the goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah and have
dealt with this particular issue at numerous religious and
jurisprudential levels. They have shown interest in them at the level of
understanding the legal injunctions and the texts of the Qur'an and the
Sunnah, at the level of deducing rulings and activating them in reality
and at the level of compiling, teaching, propagating as well as
establishing principles and rules.
As a reminder, interest in the goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah
has considerably increased in recent years at the level of universities and
faculties, at the level of compilation by individuals and institutions and
at the level of issuing religious verdicts and exercising independent
reasoning in various scientific and juristic academies and bodies.
It is for this reason that I have considered writing on this significant
issue with a view to clarifying the reality of the paradigm of the goals
and objectives of the Sharee'ah as well as its theories and importance in
our contemporary life and in the Islamic law.
Plan of Study
The present study comprises an introduction and three main
sections. In the introduction, I have presented the definition of
induction, its types and authority as well as some examples of induction.
54 Al-Adl (33)
In the first section, I have explained the reality of inductive goals and
objectives as to their definition, examples, domains and names. In the
second section, I have delineated the authority of inductive goals and
objectives, stating that they represent ultimate legal evidence. I have also
brought to light the reality of the overall legal evidence according to the
past and present scholars as well as its authority and relation to the
inductive goals and objectives. In the third section, I have shown the
regulations governing the inductive goals and objectives. These
regulations are: (1) regulations of the competent scholar who conducts
induction, (2) regulations relating to the inducted details and (3)
regulations relating to the inductive outcomes.
Past Studies on the Subject
It is more than likely, in my estimation, that there has never been a
study that has thoroughly dealt with the inductive goals and objectives.
I know for sure, like every one else, that the subject matter of the present
study has been part of a number of studies and research papers;
therefore, past studies on the subject can be generally found in the
following sources:
In the books of usool,3 under, istiqraa' being a mode of istinbaat
(inference, the process of extracting laws) as well as under ta'leel
(justification, explanation), hikmah (wisdom) and maslahah
(consideration of public interest), amongst other things.
In the books of Al-maqaasid Ash-Shar'iyyah (goals and objectives of
the Sharee'ah), particularly with regard to ways of arriving at these
goals and objectives or ways of bringing them to light. In fact,
istiqraa' (induction) is considered the most prominent of these ways.
In books and researches which deal with the reality of istiqraa' and
anything related to it. In fact, such books and researches do contain
some information about maqaasid, albeit with some difference in
terms of the number of times they are mentioned, whether they are
55 Al-Adl (33)
This means independent reasoning and analytical thought. Ijtihaad may involve the
interpretation of the source materials, inference of rules from them, or giving a legal
verdict or decision on any issue on which there is no specific guidance in the Qur'an
and the Sunnah. (Translator's Note)
56 Al-Adl (33)
worlds'; and may Allah's peace and blessings be upon our Prophet, guide
and beloved Muhammad.'
Reality of Istiqraa'
Definition of Istiqraa'
The definition of the term 'istiqraa'' has been furnished linguistically
and technically as follows:
Linguistic Definition
Linguistically, the word 'istiqraa'' is derived from qara'a and iqtara'a,
which means 'to follow up and carry out a minute examination of
something'. Therefore, it generally refers to thorough examination and
investigation.5
Technical Definition in the Terminology of Usooliyyoon6
It is worth mentioning here that the usooliyyoon's interest in the
terminology of istiqraa' was rather limited as to subtlety,
comprehensiveness, detail and expansion. 7 There were some definitions,
however, which serve as fundamental preliminaries to extracting an
accurate, scientific and practical definition.
The following are definitions furnished by past usooliyyoon:
Abu Haamid Al-Ghazaalee defined istiqraa' as "the examination
of particular instances in order to reach a decision concerning a
matter that comprises these instances through the use of the
See Lisaan Al-'Arab, 3/79; Al-Mu'jam Al-Waseet, 2/731; and Al-Qaamoos Al-Mubayyin Fee
Istilaahaat Al-Usooliyyeen, p. 83.
6 See footnote 2. (Translator's Note)
7 To clarify, an example of this is that some past usooliyyoon did not make a distinction
between perfect and imperfect istiqraa' as to their definitions, analogy, authority and
application. Nor did they compare them to some terms in the field of usool, such as
analogy and istidlaal. Some contemporary scholars have examined the definitions of
istiqraa' as past usooliyyoon understood it and have revealed their inadequacies and
expressed some objections to them. See, for instance, Al-'Umoom Al-Ma'nawee 'inda AlUsooliyyeen, a master's thesis written by the researcher Muhammad Abdul-Kareem,
College of Sharee'ah, Riyadh. Dr. Omar Al-Omaireenee said, "It is obvious that they
did not give much attention to the issue of Istiqraa as a term used to signify one of the
various types of evidence." See Al-Istidlaal 'Inda Al-Usoooliyyeen, p.193.
5
57 Al-Adl (33)
Al-Mustasfaa, 1/51.
Mi'yaar Al-'Ilm Fee Fann Al-Mantiq, p.115.
10 Mi'yaar Al-'Ilm, p.116.
11 Sharh Tanqeeh Al-Fusool, p. 448.
12 Sharh Al-AsfahaaneeLi Minhaaj Al-Baidhaawee, 2/759.
13 Ar-Radd 'Alal-Mantiqiyyeen, p. 6, as has been quoted by Dr. Mahdee Fadlullaah in his
book Madkahl Ilaa 'Ilm Al-Mantiq, p. 245.
14 Haashiyat At-Tawdheeh Wat-Tasheeh Li Mushkilaat At-Tanqeeh, 2/224, as has been quoted
in Turuq Al-Kashf 'An Maqaasid Ash-Shaari', p. 295.
15 Madkahl Ilaa 'Ilm Al-Mantiq, p. 244.
8
9
58 Al-Adl (33)
59 Al-Adl (33)
20
60 Al-Adl (33)
62 Al-Adl (33)
acceptable and its proof is binding. Ibn Muflif said, "Istiqraa' signifies
a definitive state and acting upon it is necessary."24 Al-Ghazaalee
said, "It is well-known that the Lawmaker considers the most likely
states of things to be in the same position as the intended matters.
Sleep, for instance, which is the most likely state of causing ritual
impurity, is considered a state of ritual impurity.25
Investigating all the particular instances is rather impossible due to
the fact that it is next to impossible to limit the huge number and
rapid development of these particular instances and whatever
circumstances and reasons related to them that arouse controversy
and trigger off heated debates amongst scholars as to whether or not
they could be considered particulars that can follow the universal
propositions, not to mention the non-existent or unknown particular
instances which crop up every now and then and which are
considered particular instances that have been inducted and
investigated with a view to establishing the universal rule that is
extracted through induction. Had it been a condition to investigate
all the particular instances, the effect of istiqraa' would have been to
no avail and its benefitrepresented in formulating the universal
outcomes and general rules and assessing new developments and
occurrences and making them follow the universal propositions and
ruleswould also be in vain. Al-Mudhaffar said, "There is no doubt
that most of the general rules consist of unlimited cases and thus it is
impossible to realise perfect induction in them."26 Defining istiqraaa',
Ibn 'Aashoor also said, "It is to investigate the particular instances to
establish a universal rule. In fact, it has been considered a proof
because universality has not been established and nothing indicates
this universality except the investigation of particular instances and
also because it is used as evidence concerning the rules of the
unknown particular instances after they have been established."27
63 Al-Adl (33)
28Abdur-Rahmaan
64 Al-Adl (33)
have the same weight as the majority and that the inconsiderable
amount of such instances can follow the majority.
Al-Asfahaanee said, "Acting on supposition (dhann) is necessary, as
it is clear that supposition occurs when it is established in most
particular instances."29
Al-Ghazaalee said, "When the rules increase in number, supposition
becomes stronger, and the more varied the particular instances become,
supposition becomes stronger."30
Ash-Shaatibee also said, "The universal can only be established as
such when most or all of the particular instances have been inducted." 31
Second Opinion: Only Some Particular Instances are Sufficient in
Istiqraa' Naaqis
Those who hold this view maintain that it is possible to restrict
oneself to some particular instances with a view to establishing their
universal rule because the reason behind istiqraa' is the universal rule
through the investigation of some of its samples and particular instances
only. Another reason is that the rest of the samples and particular
instances follow the rule of the universal rule extracted through
induction.
Dr. Ismaa'eel Al-Husainee mentioned that some scholars have gone
as far as to give up limiting themselves to the majority when defining
istiqraa' and they even used the word 'some' in their definitions of the
word. They based this action of theirs on the fact that inductive evidence
in a number of juristic issues in which jurists employed the process of
istiqraa' did not represent a majority or even reach half of them. 32
It has also been mentioned that Al-Ghazaalee did not state a majority
of particular instances as a condition in the induction process. He only
mentioned the phrase 'many particular instances'. In fact, he said in his
definition of istiqraa', "It means to examine numerous particular
instances which are included under a general sense, or rule. When a
65 Al-Adl (33)
33
34
66 Al-Adl (33)
ba'dhee does not hold unless there is some kind of legal support that
strengthens it.35
Ar-Raazee (Latin Rhazes) said, "It is obvious that this proportion will
be of no avail without separate evidence."36 Yusuf Badawee said,
"Istiqraa' is not to be relied on unless it is supported with
ijmaa'(unanimous agreement)."37
If scholars find it is impossible to realize istiqraa' Aghlabee, then they
can have recourse to istiqraa' ba'dhee.38 It is also well known that the rarer
and fewer the particular instances inducted are, the weaker and less
preponderant the levels of istiqraa' ba'dhee become. In fact, such istiqraa'
can reach a severe point of weakness with less weight and thus without
authority whatsoever according to the unanimous agreement of
scholars.39
Outcomes of Istiqraa': Examples
Outcomes of induction are the general rules or universal laws
reached through the process of istiqraa'. There are many examples of
such outcomes, and they are to be found in numerous epistemological
and scientific domains, such as the legal, linguistic, mathematical and
natural domains. We will confine ourselves to the following general
domains:
Principles of the Arabic language and the rules of grammar,
morphology and prosody
35
The same thing applies to istiqraa' in Aristotelian logic. It has been established that
istiqraa' alone cannot prove beneficial to knowledge and that it ought to be supported
by a priori rational principles so that the whole will constitute a syllogism which
proves the existence of a causal relationship to establish a definitive universal rule
than can be applicable to all similar cases. For more details, see Turuq Al-Kashf 'An
Maqaasid Ash-Shar', p. 240.
Al-Mahsool, 6/161.
Maqaasid Ash-Sharee'ah 'Inda Ibn Taymiyyah, p. 204.
38 An example of this is to follow up the age of maturity or the periods of menstruation.
The universal proposition in this respect cannot be reached by following the cases of
the majority of women and the majority of adults, not even half or a quarter of their
numbers. Observation of such individuals has been confined to only some of them.
39 Fore more information on this issue, see Dhawaabit Al-Ma'rifah, pp. 188-9.
36
37
67 Al-Adl (33)
68 Al-Adl (33)
45
The expression Maqaasid Ash-Sharee'ah refers to the goals and objectives of the
Sharee'ah. (Translator's Note)
69 Al-Adl (33)
An example of this is Ash-Shaatibee's use of the term 'istiqraa'' about a hundred times.
Ibn Al-Qayyim also mentioned scores of examples and proofs with regard to the
explanations of the Qur'an and the Sunnah; and Ibn 'Aashoor also mentioned a large
number of examples concerning the general fixed maqaasid (plural of maqsad) that are
established through istiqraa'. See Nadhariyyat Al-Maqaasid 'Inda Ash-Shaatibee, p. 283;
Manhaj Fahm Al-Kitaab Was-Sunnah, p.104; and Nadhariyyat Al-Maqaasid 'Inda Ibn
'Aashoor, p. 363.
47 Dr. Mahmood Taa Haa, Al-Qaamoos Al-Mubeen, p. 109.
46
70 Al-Adl (33)
71 Al-Adl (33)
Some of the past and present scholars mentioned differences between these three
words, but I have confined myself to the general principle, in line with the general
nature of this issue.
53 Ibn 'Aashoor mentioned that the goal and objective of the Sharee'ah with regard to
marriage is based on two principles. The first one is perpetuity and the second one is
that it must not be conditional on making it last for a certain time only. See Maqaasid
Ash-Sharee'ah, p. 158.
52
72 Al-Adl (33)
73 Al-Adl (33)
It has also been reported that Omar ibn Al-Khattaah (may Allah be
pleased once said, "When did you start to enslave the people although
they were born free by their mothers?"
An example of the various injunctions commanding the believers to
observe are: Islam prescribes laws relating to setting slaves free,
engaging in such noble practices as much as possible and encouraging
such a good deed. It also allows purchasing slaves and freeing them for
the sake of Allah as a way of spending one's zakaat. In fact, Islam
considers manumission of slaves as a form of expiation for
manslaughter, intentionally breaking one's fast in Ramadhan,
committing the sin of dhihaar or breaking one's vows. Islam also
commands the believers not to refuse a slave a written deed to pave the
way for his freedom, as Almighty Allah says, "And if any of your slaves
ask for a deed in writing [to enable them to earn their freedom for a
certain sum], give them such a deed if you know any good in them;
yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which Allah
has given to you."61
Indeed, Almighty Allah commends the act of setting slaves free, as
the Qur'an says, "But he has not made haste on the path that is steep;
and what will explain to you the path that is steep?]It is] freeing the
bondman."62
Ibn 'Aashoor said, "Similar to this is the frequent command [in the
Qur'an] to free slaves, which only makes it clear to us that one of the
ultimate goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah is the realization of
freedom."63
Domains of the Inductive Goals and Objectives of the Sharee'ah
The domain of the inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah
comprise the body of the Islamic data (proofs, rulings, intents,
inferences, etc.) which are investigated with a view to arriving at the
inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah. Past scholars, however,
tackled this issue but they never explicitly used such designation. These
74 Al-Adl (33)
75 Al-Adl (33)
Muslims, the body of texts agreed upon, legal credible intents in legal
rulings, the general proofs, and the like. Researcher Yusuf badawee
discussed this matter in this domain in detail in his book Maqaasid AshSharee'ah according to Ibn Taymiyyah. Following are some examples:
He supported the principle of sadd ad-daraa'i' (blocking of means) by
citing countless proofs.69
He established the fact that acts of worship can only be proved by
the Sharee'ah, and he supported this view by inducting the
fundamentals of the Sharee'ah.70
He decided that hiyyal (legal stratagems) are invalid in two ways; the
first one included thirty proofs and the second one included twelve
judgments.71
Domains of the Inductive Goals and Objectives of the Sharee'ah
according to Al-Ghazaalee
This domain includes the Qur'an, the Sunnah, and the inferences of
cases and the differentiation of signs.72
Domains of the Inductive Goals and Objectives of the Sharee'ah
according to Ibn 'Aashoor
This domain includes what Ibn 'Aashoor termed tasarrufaat ashsharee'ah (conduct of the Sharee'ah). He mentioned that the researcher
who delves into the goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah must not
specify any goal and objective of the Sharee'ah without first inducting the
conduct of the Sharee'ah in the type from which he intends to extract the
goal and objective of the Sharee'ah. He should also follow in the footsteps
of the leading jurists to be enlightened by their [deep] understanding [of
the issue] and be aware of their practices as to the rules of the Sharee'ah.
If he does this, he will definitely acquire the ability of extracting rules
through which he will be able to understand the intent of the
Lawgiver."73
Maqaasid Ash-Sharee'ah'Inda Ibn Taymiyyah, p. 208. The author referred to Ibn
Taymiyya's Majmoo' Al-Fataafaa, 21/508.
70 Maqaasid Ash-Sharee'ah'Inda Ibn Taymiyyah, p. 210.
71 Maqaasid Ash-Sharee'ah'Inda Ibn Taymiyyah, p. 208. The author referred to Ibn
Taymiyya's Bayaan Ad-Daleel, p. 353.
72 Al-Mustasfaa, 2/311.
73 Maqaasid Ash-Sharee'ah, p. 40.
69
76 Al-Adl (33)
77 Al-Adl (33)
That is, he has the right to return it if found undesirable. (Translator's Note)
78 Al-Adl (33)
on the authority of Ma'mar who narrated that the Prophet (may Allah's
peace and blessings be upon him) said, "Whoever monopolizes foodstuff
is a sinner", is the decrease in the quality of foodstuffs in the market.
With this kind of investigation, it becomes clear that the marketability of
foodstuff and accessibility to it is one of the ultimate goals and objectives
of the Sharee'ah. We, therefore, consider this maqsad a fundamental and
say that marketability is realized through different forms of
mu'aawadhaat (commutative contracts on the basis of 'do ut des') and the
non-marketability is also realized through different forms of
mu'aawadhaat; for people never give up concluding transactions. Apart
from mu'aawadhaat non-marketability is not to be feared, and that is
why we stated that partnership, appointment and deposition in
foodstuff before receiving it is permissible. Similar to this is the oftrepeated command [in the Qur'an] to set slaves free, which only
indicates that the realization of freedom is one of the ultimate goals and
objectives of the Sharee'ah (maqaasid)."80
We conclude from what has been mentioned above that the domain
of istiqraa' with regard to the goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah
comprises the legal particular instances and data that are related to the
goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah. It is obvious that these particular
instances and data comprise texts, consensuses, legal rulings and proofs,
the statements of the early generations of Muslims, their independent
reasoning and analytical thought, the fundamentals, occurrences and the
various legal proofs and inferences.81 This domain also includes
whatever is related to all that, such as the circumstances of texts and
proofs as to explicitness, generality, particularity, and the evidence as to
explicitness, implicitness, justification, worship, addition, limitation,
criticism, opposition, and the like.
Each one of these, however, has an effect on the istiqraa' process, its
levels and degrees and its authority as to strength and weakness and its
being definitive or speculative. Therefore, the mujtahidoon and those
who carry out induction (istiqraa') are required to engage in careful,
80
81
79 Al-Adl (33)
deep observation and reflection, to make huge efforts and to have the
best of intentions with a view to conducting the discretionary inductive
processes in the best possible manner, establishing the best operative
universal rules and using them as criteria and thus adding whatever
deserves to be added to them.
Appellations of the Inductive Goals and Objectives of the Sharee'ah
Every now and then, scholars give the expression al-maqaasid alistiqraa'yah (inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah) appellations
that are superficially distinct but similar in meaning.
These appellations include al-istiqraa' al-ma'nawee (abstract
induction), al-'umoom al-ma'nawee (abstract whole), at-tawaatur alma'nawee (abstract frequency), al-masaalih al-kulliyyah (universal
benefits), ad-daleel ash-sar'ee al-kullee (universal legal proof), ad-daleel al'aam (universal proof), ad-daleel al-ijmaalee (comprehensive evidence), addaleel al'ba'eed (distant evidence), ad-daleel al-'aalee (sublime evidence), alqiyyaas al-kullee (comprehensive analogy) and qiyyaas al ma'aanee
(analogy of intents).82
They have been termed al-istiqraa' al-ma'nawee, as Ash-Shaatibee
states, "The evidence for this is: The [command to] apply the istiqraa'
process on the Sharee'ah, to observe its universal and particular proofs
and to examine these general matters which it comprises to reach the
state of an abstract induction (istiqraa' ma'nawee) which cannot be
established with a particular proof, but rather with [a number of] proofs
added to each other."83
They have been termed al-'umoom al-ma'nawee: "Al-'umoom alma'nawee (the abstract whole) is a comprehensiveness which examines
the particular instances within it in a universal manner through istiqraa',
See Ali Hasb Allah, At-Tashree' Al-Islaamee, p.149; Az-Zarqaa, Al-Istislaah Wal-Masaalih
Al-Mursalah, p.29 as has been quoted from Ibn Taymiyyah's Al-Istislaah, p.199; and my
research paper titled Al-Munaasabah Ash-Shar'iyyah Wa Tatbeeqaatuhaa Al-Mu'aasirah,
p.242ff (under print).
83 Al-Muwwafaqaat, 2/21.
82
80 Al-Adl (33)
'urf84, or evidence which is connected with the word and thus takes on
the general meaning of the word."85
They have been termed al-amr al-kullee al'aam: "If universality is established,
it is not necessary for it to be established through the wordings of universality
only; rather, it has two ways. The first one is the wording if it is availableand
this is the well known opinion of usooliyyoon; the second one is the induction of
the contexts of the ma'naa until a universal comprehensive rule (amr kullee aam)
is formulated in the mind and thus its ruling takes the same course as that of
the universality understood from the wordings."86
Researcher Muhammad Al 'Abd Al-Kareem has mentioned a number of
statements, which he attributed to those who expressed them, and indicated
their use of the expression al-'umoom al-ma'nawee (the abstract whole) or 'umoom
al-ma'naa (the universality of intent) explicitly or through allusion.87
They have also been termed al-ma'naa (intent) or ma'aanee al-usool (the
fundamentals' intents): "It is well known that Ash-Shaafi'ee's school of thought
adheres to the ma'naa even if this latter is not based on a fundamental as long as
it is closed to ma'aanee al-usool."88
There are many other appellations of al-maqaasid al-istiqraa'yah, which are
readily available in the books of past and present scholars.
The observer should not be concerned with adhering to the different
appellations and expressions of al-maqaasid al-istiqraa'yah. Rather, he ought to
consider the reality of these maqaasid (goals and objectives), their essential
nature and adopt them in the processes of induction and qiyaas89 as well as in
deciding on the preponderant opinion (tarjeeh). What is, therefore, the reality of
al-maqaasid al-istiqraa'yah in these processes?
'Urf: Local custom which is `recognizably' good. In the absence of anything to the
contrary, derivation of the law from the common and approved mores of a people.
(Translator's Note)
85 Muhammad Al 'Abd Al-Kareem, Al'Umoom Al-Ma'nawee 'Inda Al-Usooliyyeen, p.75
86 Al-Muwwafaqaat, 3/278.
87 These scholars include Ibn Taymiyyah, Al-Qarraafee, Ibn As-Sam'aanee and Ibn AlQayyim. See Al-'Umoom Al-Ma'nawee, p. 66ff.
88 Al-Juwwenee, Al-Burhaan, 2/1114.
89 Qiyaas: Analogical deduction or reasoning. Recourse to analogy is only warranted if
the solution of a new case cannot be found in the Qur'an and the Sunnah. Analogy
then consists in extending a principle (asl) derived from the Qur'an and the Sunnah to
the new case. Analogical deduction cannot operate independently of the nusoos.
(Translator's Note)
84
81 Al-Adl (33)
Daleel (plural: adillah): Proof, indication, evidence. Every ruling or judgment needs to
be substantiated by the appropriate daleel in the first instance from the Qur'an and the
Sunnah. (Translator's Note)
82 Al-Adl (33)
It has largely been used, however, to refer to the textual evidence of the
Qur'an and the Sunnah as well as ijmaa'. That is, evidence concerning a
particular ruling, such as the use of such-and-such verse as evidence of a
certain ruling, and the use of a hadeeth to prove a certain ruling. The daleel is
also used among scholars as evidence concerning general issues, but with a
difference as to explicitness or allusion, number of times of its use and the
difference in giving it various appellations and expressions, such as alqaa'idah al-'aammah (universal rule), al-asl al-kullee (universal fundamental),
al-mabda' ash-shar'ee (legal principle) and al-jins al-'aalee (exalted species).
From all these uses and meanings, the researcher can establish the two
types of the daleel.
The Two Types of the Daleel
These are the partial legal daleel (proof) and the universal legal daleel.
1. Partial Legal Daleel (Daleel Shar'ee Juz'ee)
This refers to the daleel which, when used, automatically signifies the
text of the Qur'an, text of the hadeeth, Sunnah fi'liyyah96, Sunnah
Taqreeriyyah97 or specific consensus (ijmaa' khaas)98. In fact, this type of daleel
is the one that is commonly used in the various circles, including, those who
exercise ijtihaad, those who issue legal verdicts, those who give sermons as
well as judges. Statements of past and present scholars confirm this fact.
This usage becomes more evident when dealing with the daleel. That is why
whenever these scholars mention the legal or juristic ruling, they associate it
with its partial daleel from the Qur'an, the Sunnah, or specific consensus; or
both the Qur'an and the Sunnah; or from the Qur'an, the Sunnah and ijmaa'.
The faqeeh (jurist) would say, for example, "Trade is lawful and the daleel for
this is Allah's saying, 'Allah has made trade lawful.'"99
That is, it has to do with the actions of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be
upon him). (Translator's Note)
97 That is, one indicating the tacit approval of the Prophet (may Allah's peace and
blessings be upon him). (Translator's Note)
96
Ijmaa' khaas here means consensus concerning a specific issue and which shows a
partial ruling, such as the scholars' consensus regarding the necessity of the guardian
when marrying a very young girl. There is another type of consensus known as ijmaa'
kullee (general consensus) or dhimmee (implicit), which refers to consensus on a general
rule. For more details, see Ad-Daleel 'Inda Adh-Dhaahiriyyah, by the present author, pp.
280-1.
99 Surat Al-Baqarah, 2:275.
98
83 Al-Adl (33)
84 Al-Adl (33)
For further deatils, see Adeeb Saalih, Tafseer An-Nusoos FilFiqh Al-Islaamee, 1/591ff.
Surat Al-An'aam, 6:38.
85 Al-Adl (33)
86 Al-Adl (33)
87 Al-Adl (33)
Al-Muwwaafaqaat, 2/21.
Ibid., 3/298.
116 Ibid., 3/10.
117 Ibid., 3/298.
118Ibid., 3/209.
114
115
88 Al-Adl (33)
89 Al-Adl (33)
al-kulliyyaat al-istiqraa'iyyah128 (inductive universals); istidlaal (deduction); almaslahah al-mursalah (public interests of the greater good)129; al-qawaa'id alkulliyyah (universal rules); al-asl al-kullee130 (universal fundamental); al-ajnaas
al-'aaliyah (sublime genera) and different other appellations and
expressions.131
Indeed, the appellations furnished by present-day researchers and
scholars with regard to the universal legal daleel are numerous. They are
expounded in their books, research papers and articles, and they are
commonly used in their gatherings, symposia and discussions, hence the
important position of this type of daleel and its role in understanding,
istinbaat and tarjeeh. These appellations also bring into view the position of
al-maqaasid al-istiqraaiyyah (inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah)
and their role in tackling present-day issues through the processes of idraaj,
haml and qiyaas.
Of all these numerous statements, we are going to cite a few of them
with a view to gaining more assurances and satisfaction, activating it and
establishing it in the present time as well as researching its problems and
occurrences.
Al-maslahah al-mursalah (public interests of the greater good) 132 is the
interest that is based on the appropriate mursal (greater good),
which is the appropriate description of the goals and objectives
which are devoid of a specific proof indicating consideration of the
validity of basing rulings on it, or indicating otherwise. Allah knows
best.133
[Al-masaalih] al-mursalah does not constitute analogical reasoning,
for analogical reasoning is a specific fundamental, while these are
Milood Farroojee, Minhaaj Fahm Al-Kitaab Was-Sunnah, p. 105.
Maslahah mursalah (plural: al masaalih al mursalah): A consideration which is proper
and harmonious with the objectives of the Lawgiver; it secures a benefit or prevents a
harm, but the Sharee'ah provides no indication as to its validity or otherwise. For
example, the Companions decided to issue currency, to establish prisons, and to
impose a tax on agricultural lands despite the fact that no textual authority could be
found for these measures. (Translator's Note)
130 Al-Wasf Al-Munaasib Li Shar' Al-Hukm, p. 252.
131 For further details, see Shalabee, Ta'leel Al-Ahkaam and Ar-Rabee'ah, Adillat AtTashree'.
132 See definition above.
133 Al-Wasf Al-Munaasib Li Shar' Al-Hukm, p. 251.
128
129
90 Al-Adl (33)
recognised not only by one single proof (daleel) but with numerous
proofs from the Qur'an, the Sunnah, concomitants and the
differentiation of signs. That is why it is called maslahah mursalah.134
By inducting the sources and references of the Sharee'ah, we find
that it places the genus of the consideration of benefits into the
genus of rulings in general.135
Authority of the Universal Legal Daleel
The expressions 'authority', 'wisdom' or 'reality' of the universal legal
daleel are all related to the position of this daleel and its role in the processes
of istinbaat and ijtihaad and its function in bringing about rulings, legal
verdicts and solutions to issues related to real life situations. The question
that arises here is, can we consider this daleel one of the sources of
jurisprudence and a path of istinbaat?
This question and its answer and the provision of evidence for its
support is common in the legal and usool136 studies; for it is the general
practice of the usooliyyoon to present the binding proof and authority of
such-and-such term, display its proofs, and respond to objections and
refutations directed to it, putting forth arguments by analogy with it and
other established and well known practices in this respect.
In fact, part of this issue has been discussed in the present paper, but
this discussion that does not rise to the level of sufficient clarification as to
raising this question and responding to it and establishing the position of
this legal daleel and the role it plays in the processes of istinbaat and ijtihaad.
Past and present scholars are generally agreed on what is known as
'umoom al-adillah ash-shar'iyyah (generality of the legal proofs), al-qawaa'id al'aammah lish-sharee'ah (general rules of the Sharee'ah) and al-khasaa'is alkubraa lil-Islaam (salient characteristics of Islam). They are also agreed that
these terms ought to be taken into consideration in the religion of Almighty
Allah and in the process of deriving rules (istinbaat), deciding on the most
preponderant ones (tarjeeh) as well as in implementing and activating them.
They also decide that these terms are extractions of the various proofs of
the Sharee'ah, the details of its instructions and guidance, the ramifications
of its rulings, 'ilal137 and wisdom, the various inferences, intents and signs,
Asaas Al-Qiyaas, p. 98.
AbdulKareem An-Namlah, Ithaaf Dhawee Al-Basaa'ir, 7/229.
136 This refers to the fundamentals of Islamic jurisprudence. (Translator's Note
137 Plural of 'illah.
134
135
91 Al-Adl (33)
and every ruling that is apparent, succinct, general and absolute, and
whatever contributes to the formulation and creation of these terms.
They also determine that that these terms have numerous appellations
and expressions that are generally and largely in agreement or at least
closely related, and this is due to the difference in understanding and
scholarship among scholars, jurists and mujtahidoon138. They also attribute
this to the multiplicity of paths of istinbaat and the wider scope of
observation and deduction (istidlaal), the vast domains of life, the wide
variety of its issues, the growing number of incidents, and similar matters.
These learned scholars have proved the authority and binding proof of
this daleel and demonstrated the validity in matters relating to istinbaat and
tadleel (establishing evidence). All these proofs have been grouped under
what is commonly known as al-manqool wal-ma'qool (the text and the
intellect), or adillat an-nass wal-ijmaa' wa kalaam assalaf wal-khalaf (the
evidence of the text, ijmaa', and the statements of the ancestors and the
successors), shawaahid al-hiss wal-waaqi' (proofs of intuition and real life),
qawaa'id al-'aql wal-mantiq (rules of the intellect and logic), and many other
expressions.
In view of that, it has become unquestionable that the universal legal
daleel is generally a legal rule and guide and a religious fundamental
whereby rulings are identified, solutions are found and choices and
opinions become preponderant.
The existing difference among Muslim scholars and researchers,
however, is related to the degree of this presupposition and approbation;
that is, it is related to the degree of its cogency in the processes of istinbaat
and tadleel. This is known among these scholars and researchers as the
oscillation of the authority of this daleel between being described as qat'ee
(definitive) and dhannee (speculative). This means that this daleel can be
described as qat'ee and dhannee according to some scholars and as highly
dhannee and preponderant according to others. This difference in authority
is attributed to the foundation upon which this daleel has been based. It is
well known that this daleel has been founded on istiqraa'; that is, it has been
extracted through the investigation of its particular instances, branches and
premises. It is also well known that scholars are not agreed as to the
138
92 Al-Adl (33)
139
140
93 Al-Adl (33)
94 Al-Adl (33)
predominant state of qat' or dhann denote that and lead to it. In fact,
speculative (dhannee) rulings are valid and undisputed; likewise, the
prevalent definitive (qat'ee) rulings are valid and unquestionable. Scholars,
past and present, have established that high probability and predominance
of speculation is to be adopted in jurisprudence, independent reasoning and
the fundamentals of Islamic jurisprudence. Had it not been for this
predominance of speculation, analogical reasoning, aahaad reports144 and the
process of extracting laws would not have been approved, branches and
rulings would not have branched out from these fundamentals and the
aspects, occurrences and phenomena characterizing life in each period
would not have become known.
Preponderance of speculation can be ascribed to a number of things
including the following:
The multiplicity of particular instances and data investigated, for
the universal legal daleel (evidence) has been extracted from the
totality of these particular instances, cases and data inducted.
Religious texts and unanimous agreements among scholars give
support to the universal legal daleel , especially if such a daleel has
been extracted through the investigation of a small number of
particular instances; in which case its authority and weight diminish
in cogency.
The qualified scholar who conducts istiqraa' feels satisfied and at
ease about the rules he has managed to extract after the effort,
energy and endurance he put in to reach this goal. In this case, the
mujtahid is in a win-win situation all around, for he will be
rewarded whether he is successful or otherwise in his efforts.
Activating legal rulings in real life situations; the necessity of
solving people's problems, providing answers to their queries and
furnishing them with legal alternatives; blocking the way in the face
of self-styled scholars who attempt to effect changes in the Religion
of Allah by perverting words form their proper places in religious
texts and taking in exchange that which is superior to that which is
A prophetic report categorized as khabar al-Aahaad is that whose narrators do not
reach anywhere near the number for miutawaatir. The latter refers to the hadeeth
reported by a large number of narrators whose agreement upon a lie is inconceivable.
(Translator's Note)
144
95 Al-Adl (33)
The sect known as Dhaahiriyyah divides ijmaa' into the following groups: ijmaa' khaass
(specific consensus), ijmaa' juz'ee (partial consensus), ijmaa' sareeh (explicit consensus),
ijmaa''Aamm (general consensus), ijmaa' kullee (universal consensus) and ijmaa'
dhimnee (implicit consensus). See Ad-Daleel ;Inda Adh-Dhaahiriyyah, p. 280ff.
145
96 Al-Adl (33)
97 Al-Adl (33)
149
150
98 Al-Adl (33)
These include knowledge of the Noble Qur'an, the Sunnah, controversial issues, issues
agreed upon by Muslim scholars, knowledge of the Arabic language, and reports of
the Prophet's companions and their successors (may Allah be pleased with them).
152 These include analogical reasoning, justifications of views, establishing preponderant
views, and understanding of the existing circumstances.
153 This refers to the piety and righteousness of the mujtahid inwardly and outwardly.
151
99 Al-Adl (33)
154
See the Domains of the Inductive Goals and Objectives of the Sharee'ah in the present
paper.
155
156
Second Regulation
The second regulation is that the amount of the particular instances
investigated must be complete and sufficient enough to reach the level
of high probability and certainty. This amount, however, varies in
quantity and quality depending on the amount of the legal proofs and
rulings available to the mujtahid as well as the various objections157 to
them, interpretations, revisions and the circumstances surrounding
them. That is why we mentioned earlier158 that the more numerous the
particular instances to be investigated are or the more they are
supported with religious texts and consensusesalbeit small in number,
the more definitive and authoritative istiqraa' becomes.
Regulations Governing
Inductive Outcomes
The inductive outcomes are the universal rules and laws extracted
after observing and investigating the particular instances investigated.
Such outcomes are known in the domain of the goals and objectives of
the Sharee'ah as al-maqaasid al-istiqraa'iyyah (i.e. the inductive goals and
objectives of the Sharee'ah). These goals and objectives have regulations
and constraints, which are bound to convince the researcher and the
observer of the important position of these goals and objectives and the
importance of relying on them and employing them in finding Islamic
legal solutions to the various issues of the universe, life and human
problems and circumstances. These regulations and constraints are as
follows:
First Regulation
The inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah ought to be legal
and governed by the dictates of the Sharee'ah. They have to confirm with
the principle of worshipping Allah alone and completely submitting to
His Will and Rule as well as with the paradigm of the Islamic
obligations established by the noble revelation and the authentic
reasoning and analytical thought.
Second regulation
The inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah ought to be
rational159 and realistic; that is, they have to be approved by sound
human minds. They also ought to respond to the needs of real life
Rationality of the inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah have been mentioned
by Muslim scholars under what is termed al-munaasabah (suitability) and al-wasf almunaasib (suitable description), which is acceptable to the intellect and approved by it.
Abu Zayd Ad-Dappoosee said, "Al-Munaasib is the one that is acceptable to the mind
when it is presented to it." See Ihkaam Al-Aamidee, 2/270; Ibn Al-Haajib, Ail-Muntahaa,
p. 182. In fact, al-munaasabah is considered one of the paths of the inductive goals and
objectives of the Sharee'ah. For further details concerning this point, see Al-Munaasabah
Ash-Shar'iyyah Wa Tatbeeqaatuhaa Al-Mu'aasirah, by the present author, p. 266ff.
159
The best case in point in our present century is that the western mind has reached, at
various stages, a high degree of deviation from morals, a state of affairs which has
made people consider decency and modesty as a form of odd character and moral
decadence as a accepted and favorable and civilized practice. This is a clear indication
that the deviant mind is not fit to infer an inductive goal or objective, let alone judging
it and supporting it; for it has no good in it, nor does it bring any good.
160
goal, namely, to realize worship of Allah alone and to reform the created
beings in this life and in the hereafter.
Third Regulation
The inductive goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah embrace ultimate
public interests in that they endeavour to realise all genuine benefits and
avoid all possible evils in this life and in the hereafter.
Public interests here are judged by the criteria of the Sharee'ah and
determined in the light of its conclusive evidence and in accordance
with its teachings and rulings. That is, the benefits to be realized and the
evils to be averted must be governed by the noble teachings of the
Sharee'ah and must not follow the dictates of personal whims and desires
or satanic whisperings.
It is well known that the goals and objectives of the Sharee'ah are to
meet a number of conditions which have been set by past and present
scholars. These conditions are as follows:
For more details on these regulations, see Al-Ijtihaad Al-Maqaasidee, 2/119ff and Fusool
Fil-Fikr Al-Islaamee, p. 150.
161