Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
In the decade that has seen a general acceptance of internet-based solutions for key business
management tasks, the phrase Brand Management has passed into the language to denote
a common, if specialist, sub-discipline somewhere in the overlap between Marketing Asset
and Marketing Resource Management systems.
But the brand itself has long been recognised as a valuable contributor to business success.
The certainties enshrined in the venerable tradition of the Brand Book demonstrate that
consistent application from both compliance and customer perspectives lie at the heart
of successful brand activation programs.
After a couple of centuries of sedate progress from cows hindquarters to catchy logo
and tagline, the brand has exploded into the world of digital communication. The mass
replication of image and opinion redefines brand reputation and value from minute to minute
in an open-door laboratory to which every part of any business - if it can get a word
in edgeways - has a mission-critical contribution to make.
So what sensible approaches can organisations take towards managing the risks
and opportunities that this new world of brand-centred possibilities brings with it?
There are two aspects to consider when answering this question:
1. An exploration of the function and reach of the modern brand
2. An assessment of the kind of tools that can offer more effective brand management
B = v(P) x C
The brand promise (P) is, of course, scaled directly to the ambition behind it. Its resonance
and accuracy in answering or creating a need will produce a more or less compelling call to
action across all stakeholder groups.
For the purposes of this illustration, though, we can see just how sensitive the equation is
to any deficiency in consistency (C), which immediately reduces any value associated with the
promise, and directly diminishes the stature of the brand.
How brand value is measured, although not the subject of this paper, is an increasingly exact
science driven by reporting standards that require, for instance, a brand value to be given
when accounting for mergers and acquisitions in Europe and North America.
Various models exist, using discounted cash flow or debt plus equity measures to arrive at
figures as great as a contribution of 40% of market value.
The lesson here is that brand ideas contribute hugely to the underlying value of any business,
and that value can be measured. It follows too, that with the right tools, brand value can be
effectively managed for optimum performance.
2014. Adgistics. All rights reserved.
The home of intelligent brands
A potential consequence of this approach is to silo and isolate business functions, and therefore
to reduce common ground for the cultivation of interdisciplinary links and the innovation they
encourage. In these circumstances, the brand fulfills an essential role in expressing a shared
language and culture that aligns widely diverse operational groups. It forms a medium for the
distillation and expression of best practice in all departments and disciplines.
Far wider than the single-minded pursuit of paying customers through marketing channels,
the brand extends its reach into all areas of business practice.
Governance and compliance, product design, business planning, human resources, operations,
supply chain, quality control, IT, training and recruitment form only a partial list of those
functions upon which the brand can have a direct bearing - and vice-versa.
As a container for and concentrator of value, the brand takes on the function of an operating
system for business, the connective tissue that integrates and defines the whole. It follows,
then, that some attention can be usefully given to understanding and managing its extent, with
the aim of optimising its performance and the multiplier effect it can have on business value.
This can present a problem to the systematic mind of an IT architect who is looking to aggregate
and streamline as many processes as possible into a pre-conceived information design. Systems
that are prescriptive due to simplicity at the low end or detailed design at the high end are,
therefore, most prevalent in the market.
Clearly a degree of architectural flexibility, both in the overall framework of the system and
in the extent to which its necessarily wide-ranging functionality can be custom-configured
(at low cost), is a critical requirement for a tool that will serve in the long term.
To test for these conditions, a useful perspective is to measure the fitness of any system
against elements common to all brand processes, irrespective of the nature of the
brand asset under consideration, be it advertising campaign or HR policy. In this regard
we have established a benchmark for a generalised brand supply process as follows:
analysis
strategy
implementation
production
delivery
measurement
In setting out to select a single system to integrate analysis and strategy with execution and
measurement its clear that market choices are limited, and the chances of failure and cost
of replacement are high.
Purchasing patterns amongst many larger brand organisations suggest that business teams
are sensible to this risk, and buying more tightly focused piecemeal tools and applications
is a frequent response.
However, this in turn creates the potential for leakage in the system, with loss of data
and insight occurring at the joins between different systems.
analysis
strategy
implementation
production
delivery
measurement
System A
System C
?
?
System B
This incomplete account can introduce inaccuracies into the brand delivery process as a whole,
and most detrimentally at the point of analysis and integration into new strategy, which may
not reflect reality and thereby lead to performance loss.
In the delivery of Brand Value Management solutions, the aim is to conceive and build a
toolset that routes around both the risky single solution and lossy multiple solution problems.
This is achieved with the implementation of a Brand Centre, a lightweight and flexible
rules-based storage and delivery framework that maintains its adaptiveness
and flexibility through a single-minded focus on the brand.
The institution of a Brand Centre begins by establishing the key elements of brand value in the
organisation. While the most immediate candidates are often visual, marketing-based assets,
a clear consultancy program is designed to ensure that the correct priorities have been
identified in effect an audit of existing brand strategy and/or its development
or refinement as required.
From a technical perspective, the Brand Centre is then configured to enable input and output
to other systems that perform various functions in the brand process.
The key is not necessarily to drive these processes from within the Brand Centre, but to
provide a single platform where the outputs of specialist activities can be effectively captured,
analysed and shared across the wider business.
analysis
strategy
implementation
production
delivery
measurement
System A
System C
System B
BRAND CENTRE
This intent is reflected in the interface design, tone of voice and navigational strategy of the
Brand Centre, which should as far as possible conform to the existing expression of the brand
within the organisation and require no specific training for use.
Once the basic functionality of the Brand Centre is laid down, providing secure access to
relevant assets and the rules for their activation, a number of additional functions, delivered
as interoperable modules, can be implemented.
These can cover specialist functions within the business for which there is no IT-based process,
or complement existing systems - workflow, approval cycles, collaboration delivery and
research tasks are common examples.
STRATEGISE
IMPLEMENT
Research &
mapping
systems
Planning &
Development
processes
Brand Centre
Measurement
tools
DAM &
Activation Tools
MEASURE
Brand
Consultancy
Delivery
systems
DELIVER
The integrated picture then becomes a cyclical rather than linear process, where findings
can be built into course-correct strategy at any time, and the resultant changes in execution
implemented directly.
By providing common access to the brand in an environment designed to advocate its values,
encouraging multi-disciplinary collaboration and measuring outcomes in a quantifiable and
reportable way, the Brand Centre embodies the operating system which any brand must
become to maximise its contribution to organisational success.
The consequent impact upon more directly commercial matters is then most likely to be the one
associated with famous brands, whose value is a clear expression of their promise, consistently
applied: adding scale to growth and building resilience in adversity.
James Waite is a founder and Executive Chairman of Adgistics Ltd., a business with a 15-year record in the
successful implementation of brand management systems. In recent months he has pioneered a joint venture
with Canadian brand advisers Level5 Strategy Group to design and deliver a brand strategy and measurement
service designed specifically to integrate with the Brand Centre.
Head Office
Americas
5 Copper Row
Tower Bridge Piazza
London, SE1 2LH
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7378 6777