Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
12/09/99
Forward
This position policy statement is in compliance with and supports BCOI Welding and NDE Services /
CR&T programs and applicable Construction Codes.
The following provides information necessary to make decisions as to the placement and use of
gamma access plugs (ports) in piping weld joints that require the performance of field radiography. It
must be understood that a variety of considerations are necessary and certain assumptions are made
when evaluating this information. The data presented in the following tables is based on the most
commonly applied radiographic techniques in use on Bechtel projects and as required by the governing
design / fabrication code(s). When questions exist as to the feasibility of implementing certain
radiographic techniques, a Bechtel Radiographic Level III should be consulted for further evaluation. In
making the recommendations contained herein, radiographic exposure source strengths (Ir192) based
on those commonly available in most global regions were considered. Certain regions may not have
readily available radiographic isotopes (sources); availability of radiographic exposure sources should
be a bullet item to consider when evaluating an NDE subcontractor for potential procurement of
services to be supplied to the project.
Additionally, several cases have been encountered whereupon projects have opted to eliminate the use
of gamma ports from shop fabricated piping based on the assumption that "the availability of strong
isotopes in the U.S. negates the need for the gamma ports"; the fact is that no strength of isotope
(Iridium192) can overcome the constraints imposed by diameter and wall thickness. While varying
conditions can affect the use of gamma ports, the decision to eliminate their use altogether should not
be made without a detailed evaluation by CR&T / Welding & NDE Services personnel.
Panoramic exposures take significantly less time due to less steel to penetrate (thus less radiation
absorption) and less distance between the source and the film. Gamma access ports, which allow the
source to be positioned in a centered position inside the pipe, must be installed to facilitate
performance of this radiographic exposure technique.
An extreme example of how the joint configuration (diameter & wall thickness) can impact exposure
time is included on the attached exposure data sheets. Main Steam piping welds, which are
radiographed during the progression of generating station construction, could take 20 hours without the
utilization of a panoramic exposure technique (24" diameter, 2.344" T wall). Exposure using a
panoramic technique yields an 8 minute exposure time.
The benefit in the use of gamma ports is facilitation of Fast-Track Project Schedules, in the field,
whether in the U.S. or overseas!
Making a decision to eliminate the use of gamma ports without knowledgeable input from informed
personnel could subject a project to lengthy exposure times, imposing unnecessary scheduling conflicts
which can be difficult, if not impossible, to overcome.
The data and recommendations following should be considered by CR&T / Welding & NDE Specialists,
project engineering personnel, and the appropriate purchasing representatives prior to finalizing
decisions regarding the use of gamma ports in subject piping.
II.
The following table contains data needed to effectively evaluate exposure times of double-wall contact
(Figure 1-A, B) and panoramic techniques (Figure 2-A, B). 80 curie and 40 curie source (Ir192) activity
strengths are included to demonstrate the significant difference in resultant exposure times when
isotopes of these activity levels are utilized for the performance of radiography.
Page 2 of 11
Nominal
Pipe Size
Dia. /
O.D.
Exposure
Source
Type /
Strength
8/
8.625
Ir192 80 Cu
10 /
10.75
Ir192 80 Cu
12 /
12.75
Ir192 80 Cu
Table 1; Nominal Wall Thickness, Cumulative Exposure Time (:SS, MM:SS, or HH:MM:SS), Source Activity
Sch.40
Wall, T (in.)
Ir192 40 Cu
Ir192 40 Cu
Ir192 40 Cu
.322
.365
.406
Ir192 80 Cu
14
Ir192 40 Cu
.438
Ir192 80 Cu
16
Ir192 40 Cu
.500
Ir192 80 Cu
18
Ir192 40 Cu
.562
Ir192 80 Cu
20
Ir192 40 Cu
.594
Sch.80
Exp Time,
DWC
Exp Time,
Panoramic
:06
NA
:12
NA
:20
:03
:40
:05
:32
:04
1:04
:08
:55
:06
1:50
:12
1:20
:08
2:40
:16
2:18
:11
4:36
:22
3:18
:14
6:36
:28
Wall, T (in.)
.500
.594
.688
.750
.844
.938
1.031
Ir192 80 Cu
22
Ir192 40 Cu
1.125
Non-Std
Ir192 40 Cu
Ir192 80 Cu
24
12/09/99
.688
7:56
:38
15:52
1:16
1.219
Sch.120
Exp Time,
DWC
Exp Time,
Panoramic
:12
NA
:24
NA
:40
:04
1:20
:07
1:20
:06
2:40
:12
2:05
:08
4:10
:17
3:45
:12
7:30
:24
7:42
:18
15:24
:36
11:42
:25
23:24
:50
19:50
:33
39:40
1:07
33:22
:48
1:06:44
1:36
Wall, T (in.)
.719
.844
1.000
1.094
1.219
1.375
1.500
1.625
1.812
Sch.160
Exp Time,
DWC
Exp Time,
Panoramic
:24
NA
:48
NA
1:24
:05
2:48
:10
2:56
:09
5:52
:17
5:50
:13
11:40
:27
10:30
:21
21:00
:42
33:12
:36
1:06:24
1:12
46:30
:52
1:33:00
1:44
1:31:00
1:07
3:02:00
2:14
3:02:00
1:54
6:04:00
3:48
Wall, T (in.)
.906
1.125
1.312
1.406
1.594
1.781
1.969
2.125
2.344
Exp Time,
DWC
Exp Time,
Panoramic
:42
NA
1:24
NA
2:40
:07
5:20
:14
6:24
:14
12:48
:28
13:30
:18
27:00
:36
32:30
:34
1:05:00
1:08
1:30:00
:57
3:00:00
1:54
3:24:00
1:36
6:48:00
3:12
5:57:00
2:15
11:54:00
4:30
9:48:00
3:56
19:36:00
7:52
Ir192 80 Cu
26
Ir192 40 Cu
Ir192 80 Cu
28
Ir192 40 Cu
Ir192 80 Cu
30
Available Std Schedule 10 or XStrong Only / Evaluate Use of Gamma Ports for Sch 10 on Case-by-Case Basis;
Use Gamma Ports for Thickness Greater than Sch 10 (> .312") in all cases.
Ir192 40 Cu
Ir192 80 Cu
30
Ir192 40 Cu
Ir192 80 Cu
32
Ir192 40 Cu
.688
18:00
:42
36:00
1:24
Non-Std
Assumptions: Kodak AA Film, 2.5 resultant density (1.4 Exposure Factor), Iridium192; 80 curie and 40 curie source activity, Manual Film Processing. Number of
Double-Wall Contact exposures used for calculations is shown in Table 2. Exposure Set-up time must be considered in addition to times shown (see Table 2).
Page 3 of 11
12/09/99
Assumptions made to facilitate calculation of the times shown in Table 1 are as follows:
Kodak AA Film
III.
Considerations
Location; in the U.S. availability of radiographic isotopes (sources) is generally not an issue while it
can be in many regions outside of the U.S. Use of weaker isotopes can significantly prolong
exposure times. In some regions of the world, X-ray tubes are utilized more commonly; this can
affect whether gamma ports are necessary.
In a past instance, a Bechtel client has placed a specific restriction of 15 curies as to the strength of
radioactive sources (Ir192) which may be utilized for the performance of radiography by subcontractors
on the jobsite. This is of particular concern where existing client operations personnel may be in control
of plant equipment or have other activities ongoing in the area of construction. Such restrictions should
be made clear in preliminary discussions; if not, prolonged exposure times and schedule setbacks may
be incurred during completion of the scope of work.
IV.
Recommendations
A.
CR&T / Welding & NDE Services recommends the use of gamma ports in accordance with Table 3. It
should be noted that evaluation of gamma plug installation can be considered on a case-by-case basis
due to factors such as material "weldability", distortion, material type, and associated properties, if
questions or special circumstances are incurred. The recommendations of Table 3 are based on
consideration of radiographic exposure times and minimizing exposure times during field installation
activities as well as production factors associated with the installation of the plugs themselves. Many
radiographic factors affect exposure times, and it is based on commonly applied techniques that this
recommendation is based. As shown in Table 1, a "double-wall" exposure can take significantly longer
than a panoramic exposure, depending on configuration details. The radiographic subcontractor should
be made aware of the type of gamma port(s) in use as they must provide the appropriate "J-tube" and
associated fittings compatible with the plugs.
Page 4 of 11
12/09/99
Table 2
Min. Number of Exposures and Min. Expected Set-Up Time
Using a Double-Wall Contact Exposure Technique
Pipe Diameter
Min. Number of
Exposures (DWC)
< 3 1/2
:20
3 1/2 8
:20
10, 12
:25
14, 16
:30
18, 20
:35
22, 24
:40
26, 28
:45
30, 32
:50
34, 36
10
:55
Table 3
Recommended Use of Gamma Ports
Pipe Diameter (in.)
3 1/2
Not Applicable
14
16
18
20
> 20
(Note 1) Use of gamma ports on Sch. 10 piping should be evaluated on a case-bycase basis. Use Gamma Ports for Thickness Greater than Sch 10 ( > .312") in all
cases.
B.
Gamma plug design for Bechtel projects is currently in accordance with the Pipe Fabrication Institute
(PFI) Standard ES-16. This standard should be consulted for specific details regarding gamma plug
design and installation. A gamma plug offset of 6" (4" min) is acceptable to accommodate the
performance of a panoramic exposure of girth welds. Typically, this offset is 6" with 4" being the
minimum offset. Consideration should be given to the plug location and PWHT if material requiring
PWHT is used; with a 4" offset, the plug attachment weld will be very close to the girth weld.
Additionally, if the performance of ultrasonic examination (UT) of these welds is required, the gamma
plug offset would be a restriction to scanning.
Page 5 of 11
V.
12/09/99
An explanation of radiographic exposure techniques and attached figures are included to provide a
better understanding of exposure techniques. "Panoramic" exposures require the use of gamma ports.
TABLE 4
RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES
Nominal
Outside
Diameter
3 "
and
less
Type of
Exposure
Technique
Ellliptical
Contact
Superimposed
Contact
Over
3 "
Panoramic
Type of
Minimum
Exposure and
Number of
Viewing
Exposures
Dbl. Wall Exp.
2
Dbl. Wall Viewing
(at 0 & 90)
Dbl. Wall Exp.
3
Sgl. Wall Viewing (120 degrees apart)
Dbl. Wall Exp.
3
Dbl. Wall Viewing
(0, 60 & 120)
Dbl. Wall Exp.
3
Sgl. Wall Viewing (120 degrees apart)
Sgl. Wall Exp.
1
Sgl. Wall Viewing
Sgl. Wall Exp.
Sgl. Wall Viewing
(Note 1)
Sgl. Wall Exp.
Sgl. Wall Viewing
(Note 1)
Figure
1(E)
1(A,B,
C or D)
1(F)
1(A
or B)
2(A
or B)
2(C
or D)
2(E
or F)
(Note 1): An adequate number of exposures shall be made to demonstrate that the
required coverage has been obtained.
Page 6 of 11
Source
12/09/99
Source
IQI
IQI
Film
Film
(B)
(A)
Alternate Source
Locations
Alternate Source
Locations
IQI
Film
(C)
(D)
Source
Source
IQI
(E)
IQI
Film
IQI
Film
(F)
Film
FIGURE 1
DOUBLE-WALL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES
Page 7 of 11
12/09/99
Source
Source
IQI
IQI
Film
Film
(A)
(B)
Source
(C)
Source
IQI
Film
Source
(D)
IQI
Film
Source
IQI
IQI
Film
Film
(F)
(E)
FIGURE 2
SINGLE-WALL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES
Page 8 of 11
VI.
12/09/99
It is appropriate to include explanations and examples of the effects of source size and the resultant
effect on the geometric unsharpness of the exposed radiograph. Not only is source strength a critical
factor to efficient performance of radiography in the field, but also is source size. The following tables
attempt to portray how this relationship impacts code required factors governing geometric
unsharpness. As shown in Tables 4 and 5, a reduction in the source to object distance and use of too
large of a source can adversely affect the geometric unsharpness. Pre-job audits of the NDE
subcontractor should include a thorough review of source strengths and sizes.
ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code Section III places limitations on factors governing
geometric unsharpness more demanding than other design codes commonly used on Bechtel projects.
The following tables detail how factors of exposure geometry can affect the performance of radiography
when required to meet ASME III. It becomes very clear that the use of exposure sources of the
appropriate size can significantly affect the exposure technique acceptability of the final radiographs.
Exposure sources with a dimension of .171" are commonly used by radiographic subcontractors but
may not allow for meeting of geometric unsharpness requirements. Exposure sources with a dimension
of .156" will normally meet geometric unsharpness requirements but may require a special order by the
radiographic subcontractor. Since procurement of the isotope typically requires considerable advance
notice, careful consideration must be given the relationship between piping diameters, wall (weld)
thickness, and source size(s) to be utilized for the performance of radiography on the project.
Geometric unsharpness, "Ug," equals source size times object-to-film distance divided by the object-tosource distance.
Ug =
Ug =
F=
d=
D=
Fxd
D
Geometric Unsharpness
Source size in inches, the maximum projected dimension of the radiating source (or effective focal spot).
The manufacturer's certification of the source size may be used for this dimension.
Distance in inches from the source side of the weld to the film.
Distance in inches from the source of radiation to the source side of the weld being examined.
For ASME III, Geometric unsharpness (Ug) shall not exceed the following:
Material Thickness
Ug Maximum,
Inches
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.070
For ASME I, VIII, B31.1, and B31.3, Geometric unsharpness (Ug) shall not exceed .070".
Page 9 of 11
12/09/99
Table 4
Effects of Source Size & Geometric Unsharpness (Double-Wall Contact Technique)
Pipe Outside Diameter, SourceFilm-Distance (SFD)
Wall Thickness
ASME I,III,VIII,B31.X
.156" Source
ASME I,VIII,B31.X
.171" Source
8.625
0.322
OK
OK
OK
8.625
0.500
OK
OK
OK
8.625
0.719
OK
OK
OK
8.625
0.906
Ug Exceeded
OK
OK
10.75
0.365
OK
OK
OK
10.75
0.594
OK
OK
OK
10.75
0.844
OK
OK
OK
10.75
1.125
OK
OK
OK
12.75
0.406
OK
OK
OK
12.75
0.688
OK
OK
OK
12.75
1.000
OK
OK
OK
12.75
1.312
OK
OK
OK
14
0.438
OK
OK
OK
14
0.750
OK
OK
OK
14
1.094
OK
OK
OK
14
1.406
OK
OK
OK
16
0.500
OK
OK
OK
16
0.844
OK
OK
OK
16
1.219
OK
OK
OK
16
1.594
OK
OK
OK
18
0.562
OK
OK
OK
18
0.938
OK
OK
OK
18
1.375
OK
OK
OK
18
1.781
OK
OK
OK
20
0.594
OK
OK
OK
20
1.031
OK
OK
OK
20
1.500
OK
OK
OK
20
1.969
OK
OK
OK
22
1.125
OK
OK
OK
22
1.625
OK
OK
OK
22
2.125
OK
OK
OK
24
0.688
OK
OK
OK
24
1.219
OK
OK
OK
24
1.812
OK
OK
OK
24
2.344
OK
OK
OK
32
0.688
OK
OK
OK
Ug = Geometric Unsharpness
Page 10 of 11
12/09/99
Table 5
Effects of Source Size & Geometric Unsharpness (Panoramic Technique)
Pipe Outside
Diameter
Wall
Thickness
Source-Film-Distance
(SFD)
8.625
0.322
4.3125
8.625
0.5
4.3125
OK
OK
OK
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
8.625
0.719
4.3125
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
8.625
0.906
4.3125
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
10.75
0.365
5.375
OK
OK
OK
10.75
0.594
5.375
Ug Exceeded!
OK
OK
10.75
0.844
5.375
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
10.75
1.125
5.375
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
12.75
0.406
6.375
OK
OK
OK
12
0.688
6.375
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
12
6.375
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
12
1.312
6.375
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
14
0.438
OK
OK
OK
14
0.75
Ug Exceeded!
OK
OK
14
1.094
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
14
1.406
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
16
0.5
OK
OK
OK
16
0.844
Ug Exceeded!
OK
OK
16
1.219
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
16
1.594
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
18
0.562
OK
OK
OK
18
0.938
OK
OK
OK
18
1.375
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
18
1.781
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
20
0.594
10
OK
OK
OK
20
1.031
10
OK
OK
OK
20
1.5
10
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
20
1.969
10
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
22
1.125
11
OK
OK
OK
22
1.625
11
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
22
2.125
11
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
24
0.688
12
OK
OK
OK
24
1.219
12
OK
OK
OK
24
1.812
12
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
24
2.344
12
Ug Exceeded!
Ug Exceeded!
OK
28
0.312
14
OK
OK
OK
30
0.312
15
OK
OK
OK
32
0.688
16
OK
OK
OK
Ug = Geometric Unsharpness
Page 11 of 11