Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page
By taking advice at these critical stages you will ensure that your actions are consistent with
the approach taken throughout the Council, ensure, that all relevant issues are covered in
the necessary documents and that any potential weaknesses in procedure or findings are
identified at an early stage.
Dealing with suspected financial irregularities
Financial Regulations require that the Director of Resources or his representative should be
made aware immediately of any suspected irregularity affecting the finances or property of
the Council. Audit staff will give guidance on how and by whom the financial aspects of the
case should be investigated.
Where the financial irregularity is significant the Director of Resources will consult with
Legal Services about referring the matter to the police.
Dealing with suspected incidents where a child or vulnerable adult has been harmed
or put at risk of harm
Any complaints or concerns in relation to a child or vulnerable adult being harmed or put at
risk of harm must be notified immediately to the appropriate safeguarding officer. The
relevant officer will give advice on how the investigation should be carried out.
Involving the police
The police may also need to be involved where serious misconduct or irregularities are
alleged to have occurred which do not involve the Council's finances or property, such as
assault or threatening behaviour. In such cases you should contact Legal Services about
referring the matter to the police.
The police may refuse to become involved until an internal investigation has shown that
there is a real possibility of a crime having been committed. In such cases, an initial internal
investigation should be carried out to establish whether or not this is the case. If a crime
appears to have been committed, consultations about police involvement should be
resumed.
Whenever the police are involved in a case care should be taken not to impede their
investigations. It is very rarely necessary to await the result of any criminal prosecution that
might ensue unless the police or the Crown Prosecution Service specify this.
Is it capability or is it discipline?
It is sometimes very difficult to tell the difference between capability and disciplinary issues.
There are two simple phrases which distinguish between capability and disciplinary issues:Capability is "I would if I could but ..."
and a possible reason might be:I haven't been trained,
my back won't let me,
I haven't got a licence; or,
I don't understand what you mean.
Discipline is "I can but I won't ..." and a possible reason might be:I don't care what you say,
why should I?,
I'm their boss so I can do what I like!
Some things are obviously dealt with automatically under disciplinary such as fraud, theft,
physical assault against a colleague or client, dishonesty, harassment, abuse of position
and bullying.
THE NOMINATED OFFICER
Powers of Nominated Officers
Only people nominated by the Chief Officer are empowered to take formal action under the
Capability and Disciplinary Procedure. A list of accredited officers authorised to take action
under these procedures is maintained by the Human Resource Service and is available on
the intranet.
Duties of Nominated Officers
The duties of the Nominated Officer are two-fold:
to ensure that any employee who is the subject of a capability or disciplinary issue is
treated fairly and reasonably.
Selecting a Nominated Officer
A Nominated Officer should be allocated for each case as it arises, taking into account the
apparent seriousness of the issue and the experience of the Nominated Officer. In practice,
the Chief Officer may delegate the allocation of individual cases to one of the very senior
Nominated Officers.
Impartiality is essential and the Nominated Officer should, where reasonably practicable, be
a person who has not been previously involved in the matter.
Selecting an Investigating Officer
One of the first tasks of the Nominated Officer is to select an Investigating Officer, normally
from their own Directorate. An Investigating Officer is used in order to provide some
separation between the functions of "prosecutor" and "judge". The person who carries out
the investigation of a complaint should not conduct the capability or disciplinary hearing.
In both capability and disciplinary cases it is often appropriate for the employee's line
manager to be the Investigating Officer. However, there will be occasions when the nature
of the issue under investigation or the relationship between the employee and the line
manager make it inappropriate for the line manager to undertake that role. The Human
Resource Service can provide advice and guidance in selecting Investigating Officers.
When choosing an Investigating Officer you should consider that they will need to present
the case at the capability or disciplinary hearing (if there is to be one). If the case proceeds
to Employment Tribunal it is likely that they will be called as one of the key witnesses for the
Council.
Briefing the Investigating Officer
The Nominated Officer should ensure that the Investigating Officer understands the scope
and depth of the investigation required. This may change depending upon the findings of
the initial investigation.
ROLE OF THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER
The Investigating Officer has three distinct duties.
To be impartial and careful to weigh all the evidence obtained before coming to a
conclusion.
To prepare a report once all of the evidence has been gathered and make a
recommendation to the Nominated Officer about whether a formal hearing should be
convened.
To present the case for management if the Nominated Officer decides that a formal
hearing should be convened..
Conducting the investigation
In its simplest form, "investigating the case" could be as basic as asking someone to obtain
an employee's absence record and to report on whether or not all the absences were
correctly recorded and authorised. However, for more serious cases, the Investigating
Officer may need to draw up a plan for the investigation which should be carried out as
soon as possible.
The requirements set out in the document entitled Procedures for Hearings and
Appeals concerning notice of hearings DO NOT apply when arranging investigation
interviews or similar meetings. All that is required is to give reasonable warning of the
meeting. If an employee is unable to travel or be transported to work, the interview should
take place in a Council property convenient to the employees home, if practicable.
The rights and duties of employees
The document entitled Information for Employees sets out the basic information required
by an employee under suspension or investigation, the employee should be given a copy of
that document.
One of the most important implied terms in a contract of employment is mutual trust and
confidence. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that all employees will be honest when
being questioned and that the Council will conduct its investigations and hearings honestly
and in good faith. A breach of that trust is frequently fatal to the contract of employment
but employees are often and understandably reluctant to "incriminate" themselves or their
colleagues. However, whereas a person under investigation might understandably not wish
to answer certain questions, the employer has the right to expect all employees to cooperate fully in all reasonable enquiries. Therefore, it may sometimes be necessary to bring
to the employee's attention the fact that concealment, dishonesty or any attempt to prevent
the Council from undertaking a proper investigation could in itself result in disciplinary
action being taken against the person concerned.
An interviewee can be accompanied by a trade union official or a work colleague but that
person is not a representative and must not answer questions on the interviewee's behalf.
It is, however, legitimate for that person to make representations to the interviewer if (s)he
considers that the questioning is oppressive or unfair. It is also in order for that person to
suggest a particular line of questioning to the Investigating Officer in order to ensure that all
relevant issues are covered.
Interviewing
Normally, it is better to interview all those who can throw any light on the alleged poor
performance or conduct before speaking to the person under investigation. Careful notes
need to be taken. Consideration may be given to taking along a note-taker in more complex
cases, however, it is best practice to type up notes of the interview and to sign and date
them. The rough or hand-written notes should be retained on file for future reference.
Verbatim transcripts of interviews are not necessary. A copy of the interview notes should
be sent to the interviewee.
Before commencing the interview, the Investigating Officer should set the scene by
informing the interviewee of:
the purpose of the interview.
check whether they wish to be accompanied by their trade union representative or a
colleague if they are unaccompanied.
Remind the interviewee that they must tell the truth.
Investigating Officers should be systematic in their questioning. It is advisable to prepare
some key questions in advance. In addition to attempting to discover what actually
happened, the Investigating Officer also needs to establish what should have happened.
For example, if a task has been done incorrectly clarify how it should have been done and
how the individual would know this. Finally, they should summarise to test their own
understanding of what has been said.
Investigating complaints against Investigating or Enforcement Officers
Complaints against Investigating or Enforcement Officers should be investigated in the
same way as any other investigation.
The purpose of many of these complaints maybe to discredit the veracity of a Council
witness when giving evidence in a criminal prosecution. The defence will make allegations
against the investigating or enforcement officer. The officer, under cross-examination in the
witness box will have to admit that they are the subject of a disciplinary investigation and
the intention is to discredit the Council's evidence.
If the investigation reveals that there is substance to the complaint then a disciplinary
hearing must be convened under the procedure. If the complainant refuses to put the
complaint in writing or if there is no substance to the complaint then the officer will be able
to state under cross-examination that the complainant refused to elaborate or that the
complaint was made but not substantiated.
Suspension pre or post Investigation
There may be a need to suspend an employee from duty without prejudice and without loss
of remuneration if initially the view is that it may constitute gross misconduct, gross
incapability or where an investigation into the alleged offence might be impeded by the
presence at work of the employee. The Nominated Officer will determine this. Consultation
with the Human Resource Service is advisable.
Other staff (where appropriate) should be informed of the suspension and investigation in
clear, unambiguous terms and it should be stressed that there is to be no assumption of
guilt.
In many cases, especially those involving alleged or suspected assault or abuse, the letter
suspending the employee from duty may prohibit contact with a named client or pupil or
with the establishment and its staff for a period of time. This step should only be taken
where the Nominated Officer feels it is necessary.
Where an employee is suspended, it is important to ensure that their trade union or work
colleague representative is given reasonable facilities to prepare a defence, including
access to the Council employees who might be called as witnesses for the employee.
The document entitled Information for Employees sets out the basic information required
by an employee under suspension or investigation and the employee should be given a
copy of that document.
In some instances where an employee is suspended where it is suspected that a
vulnerable person has been harmed or put at risk of harm notification must be made to the
appropriate regulatory body e.g. POVA, POCA, GSCC, GTC.
DEALING WITH THE FINDINGS OF AN INVESTIGATION
Preparing the report for the Nominated Officer
The report to the Nominated Officer should be prepared in the knowledge that it might be
produced in evidence in an Employment Tribunal. The following is likely to form part of the
report;
the brief given to the Investigating Officer and the name of the Nominated Officer
a brief statement on the background to the investigation,
if relevant, a brief section covering the structure of the unit or section in which the
employee works, the employee's start date and previous record and any working
and other relationships with people who have figured in the same investigation as
complainants or witnesses,
information relating to the people interviewed during the course of the
investigation,
copy of the key documents examined, considered or consulted,
a statement of what happened as far as is known, including reference to any
imponderables and uncertainties,
a statement of what should have happened; and
a recommendation about whether there should be any further action under the
Capability and Disciplinary Procedure and, if so, the degree of seriousness of that
case. However, the Investigating Officer should not express an opinion on the
sanction which (s)he expects to be taken.
pages should be numbered for ease of reference
interview notes attached as appendix
date of report and the name of the Investigating Officer
The final report should assist the Nominated Officer and the employee to understand the
issues being raised. Where appropriate it should contain cross-references to attached
documents.
The Nominated Officer chairs the hearing. They should introduce all the participants and
explain their roles in the process. They should control the pace of the proceedings so that
everybody has a fair hearing and that, as far as possible, every issue of uncertainty is
thoroughly examined. They should allow either side reasonable opportunity to adjourn if
necessary. They may also wish to call an adjournment to take advice from the HR advisor, if
present.
Normally, only one representative is allowed but to facilitate the training of trade union, HR
and management staff, an extra representative or member of staff may be permitted purely
in an observational capacity.
Ensuring the rights of the employee during the hearing
The employee has the following rights during the hearing: to be represented or accompanied by a trade union or fellow worker in accordance
with the document entitled Procedures for Hearings and Appeals,
to question the presenter on the statements made against the employee (note that
the presenter must be prepared to bring evidence to support the assertions being
made),
to question the presenter's witnesses (if any),
to bring his or her own witnesses (assuming they are relevant to the case),
to have his or her case and explanation heard; and
to remain silent. However, if the employee adopts this stance, you must make it
clear that by remaining silent, you will only have heard the presenter's side of the
story and that you will have to make up your mind on the outcome based only
upon the evidence presented. It is also important to bring to the employee's
attention the fact that concealment, dishonesty or any attempt to prevent the
Council from undertaking a proper investigation could, in itself, result in disciplinary
action being taken.
Dealing with the organisations witnesses
Where either side intends to call relevant witnesses they should give advance notice that
they intend to do this.
The presence of a witness to give personal evidence is usually more convincing than a
written statement; particularly in appeal situations. Therefore, it is advisable to have at least
one witness if there is likely to be a conflict of evidence at the hearing.
Where the presenter intends to rely on a written statement from a witness, the employee
(or their representative) may ask for the witness to be present so that questions can be put
directly. If the witness is a Council employee the request may be agreed. If a witness is
not a Council employee they cannot be compelled to attend.
Dealing with the employee's witnesses
An employee may bring witnesses to a hearing or submit written statements from witnesses
to support their case. It is the employees responsibility to ensure that a witness is willing
to appear on their behalf or give a statement. However where the evidence is strongly
against the employee, the employer is entitled to refuse to listen to all or some of the
witnesses on the grounds that their evidence will not affect the outcome of the disciplinary
proceedings. This may be true in the following situations: where witnesses are not denying the facts of an incident but are merely
expressing personal opinions regarding the effects
where witnesses are "outside experts" brought in by the trade union to express
behalf and have no evidence relevant to the actual complaints being made.
Where there is any uncertainty over whether a witness should be called or not the Human
Resource Service should be consulted with.
Managing challenges to witness statements
If either side challenges a written witness statement, the Nominated Officer may allow the
witness to attend in person in order to clarify the matter in dispute and avoid delays.
However, the Nominated Officer should not compel the attendance of a witness in these
circumstances, especially if the witness is a pupil, a client or some other person requiring
sensitive treatment.
THE CONCLUSION OF A CAPABILITY OR DISCIPLINARY HEARING
Coming to a decision
Each case will be decided on its own particular circumstances. The standard of proof
required is that there are "reasonable grounds to believe" from the evidence presented that
the matter complained of did occur. This is not a criminal case where the case has to be
proven "beyond reasonable doubt". In reaching a decision the following should be taken
into consideration:
the nature of the complaint
the nature of the employees work
the employees level of responsibility and seniority
the employees previous capability and disciplinary record
any mitigating factors including the health of the employee
action taken in previous similar cases
sanctions available under the procedure
Your HR advisor will be able to provide advice and guidance.
Communicating the decision
When giving the decision at the end of the hearing it is advisable to write key points for
decision beforehand. This will ensure that the oral and written decisions are the same and
will avoid confusion.
It is important to remember to notify the appropriate regulatory body e.g. POVA, POCA,
GSCC, GTC re the outcome of the hearing for cases where an individual has been
suspended and/or dismissed.
Securing improvement
In most cases involving capability or discipline a reasonable employer will be expected to
take appropriate steps to bring about an improvement in the employee's performance or
conduct as well as issuing the necessary caution or warning. Where capability cautions or
disciplinary warnings are being issued, the Nominated Officer's decision will have to
incorporate the steps that need to be taken to achieve the required standard of work e.g.
closer supervision, more training. These steps must be included in the caution or warning
letter.
10
The person making the arrangements should ensure that the management and the
appellant statements of case are sent out on the same day to ensure that neither party can
build its case upon the submission of the other party.
If management witnesses gave evidence in person at the original hearing (and their
evidence made a significant contribution) they may also attend the appeal hearing. If the
employee wishes to bring witnesses who did not attend the original hearing, this should be
allowed; provided that their identity is properly disclosed in advance.
Preparing and presenting the case
Chief Officers should consider carefully who should present the management case at
appeal and may wish to consult the Human Resource Service on this matter. Normally, the
person chosen will be the Nominated Officer who heard the original case. An appropriate
member of the Human Resource Service may be available to assist the presenting officer in
the preparation of the case and may also be available to accompany the presenting officer
at the appeal hearing if required. Where a member of the Human Resource Service
assists, normally a different officer from the Human Resource Service will advise the appeal
body.
The employees grounds for appeal
The employees case must be based solely on the grounds of appeal disclosed in their
letter of appeal. The appeal body should disregard any matter not directly related to the
original grounds of appeal.
Conduct of the appeal hearing
The guidance given on conduct in capability and disciplinary hearings above applies
equally to appeals.
Dealing with appeals during employees probationary period
Where an employee has less than twelve months continuous service with the Council any
appeal against dismissal can be heard by the employees Director, unless the Director took
the original decision to dismiss. Otherwise the appeal must be heard by another Director.
Late witnesses or documentation
Requests to produce new witnesses or documentation during the hearing or the appeal
should normally be declined. If, for some very good reason, witness or documentation is
allowed, great care should be exercised when considering the testimony.
Coming to a decision
Situations where an appeal might succeed can be summarised as:a) where new facts, which were not known at the time of the original decision,
emerge which clearly shift the balance of probabilities in favour of the employee;
or,
b) where the original decision appears in all the circumstances of the case to have
been unfair.
If an admissible statement is made by either party during the hearing that raises genuine
doubts about the facts of the case, the appeal body should consider adjourning the hearing
to allow the other party to investigate the new claims.
11
12
field of education or social care are informed if there are serious concerns about the
employee in respect of pupils or clients.
Lifting monitoring arrangements
There are some cases, particularly in capability situations, where the manager may decide
to discontinue close monitoring of performance before the formal end of the caution period
in view of the fact that good progress has been made. If this is done, the employee should
be informed in writing of this fact but should also be informed that the caution will not expire
until the date previously notified.
SPECIAL SITUATIONS
Cases involving alcohol or drugs
Where a manager feels that an alcohol or drugs problem is involved in a capability or
discipline case they should consult the Human Resource Service before taking further
action.
Whilst alcohol and drugs problems are correctly recognised as medical problems requiring
treatment and support, where this course of action does not achieve the desired result it will
be necessary to invoke the capability and discipline procedure in order to seek an
improvement.
Where serious capability or conduct problems are involved it may be necessary to invoke
the capability and disciplinary procedures immediately. In more minor cases, the outcome
may be to defer a decision or action pending the employee undergoing appropriate
treatment. However, where gross misconduct is involved it will not normally be necessary to
defer a decision.
If an underlying alcohol or drug problem is suspected, but denied by the employee, the
capability or disciplinary process is unaffected.
CONDITIONS OF SERVICE ISSUES
Attendance at a hearing or interview
Where an employee is invited to attend a disciplinary or capability hearing or an
investigatory interview they are entitled to receive payment for the period involved in
attending the hearing or interview and any excess travel incurred travelling to and from it.
Where the hearing or interview is convened outside the employee's normal working hours
the employee is entitled to additional payment or time off in lieu as well as the
reimbursement of any additional traveling expenses incurred.
13
Payment of a higher grade, rate of pay or number of hours than an employees normal
contract of employment provides for, will only be made when on the day immediately prior
to suspension the employee had been receiving the payment for a minimum period of three
calendar months.
Annual leave during periods of suspension
During a period of suspension, an employee is expected to be available to take part in the
investigation at any reasonable time as required by management. Prior leave commitments
will need to be observed. Where it is anticipated that the period of suspension may be
prolonged, non-conflicting leave requests should be approved and encouraged. In
circumstances where the granting of leave will unnecessarily prolong the resolution of a
case it should be refused. All annual leave taken during suspension will count against the
employees entitlement.
Where an employee on suspension is "unavailable" during their normal working hours or is
on unauthorised leave, the period in question should be counted against their annual leave
entitlement and disciplinary action should be considered.
Where prolonged suspension is involved, or where the end of the leave year is
approaching, the employee should be encouraged to take annual leave, depending on the
stage of the investigation.
Sick leave during periods of suspension
Where an employee who has been suspended goes on sick leave they are subject to the
normal rules relating to a period of sickness absence. Although they may claim that it is the
suspension itself that has caused the sickness, the time certified as sickness absence
counts against their allowance. This means that on occasions the employee will drop to half
pay or even no pay during a period of suspension where the length of service is relatively
short or where there have been previous periods of absence.
Suspended employees who are in receipt of an essential car user allowance and who
subsequently go on sick leave should have their lump sum withdrawn as set out in
Paragraph 6.3 of the Green Book. Under this provision the lump sum is paid in full for the
remainder of the first month of absence and for the following three months. For the next
three months it is reduced to 50% and, following that, no payment is made.
Entitlement to sick pay arising from disciplinary matters
Where the Occupational Health Physician certifies that an employees absence on sick
leave is as a direct result of their misconduct, including anxiety about the consequences of
their actions, consideration should be given to recovering moneys paid in relation to
occupational sick pay (and to suspending future payments) at the point that disciplinary
action is taken.
Applications for employment during periods of suspension
Applications from employees suspended from duty prior to a hearing should be treated in
exactly the same way as if the employee was at work. This includes the giving or receiving
of references, as appropriate.
Return to work after maternity leave
14
An employee whose dismissal prevents her from completing the necessary three month
period of employment following maternity leave will be required to refund moneys paid in
respect of occupational maternity pay. Any notice period will count towards the three month
period of employment.
Reinstatement and calculation of back-pay
When an employee is reinstated (rather than re-engaged) on appeal, the following should
be considered in the calculation of retrospective payments:
a) if employee received any sickness related benefits from the DSS then, for the
period in question, they should be regarded as having been on sick leave and be
paid in accordance with the sick pay scheme;
b) if the employee obtained other employment during the period between the date of
dismissal and the decision to reinstate, details should be obtained from the
employee and deducted from the salary adjustment on the basis that the Council
only needs to make good any overall loss of earnings that has occurred. The
alternative would be to make no payment for any period when the employee was
in other paid employment. However, any such period will not be treated as a
break in continuous service.
Reinstatement and the carry over of annual leave entitlement or lieu days
Suspension is not considered to be an exceptional circumstance warranting the carry over
of outstanding leave between leave years. However, as with sickness or maternity leave,
should an employee return from suspension shortly before the end of the leave year and
be prevented from taking all or part of outstanding leave due to the demands of the service,
then that part can be carried forward and taken within a reasonable period.
In the case of lieu days e.g. where an employee has worked an additional shift prior to
suspension and is due a day off in lieu, entitlement to such days is not time limited and
therefore unaffected by the restrictions on carry over placed on annual leave.
Payments on dismissal
Where the dismissal is the consequence of the accrual of a number of warnings, except in
cases of theft or fraud, the question of withholding payments will not arise, and all
contractual entitlements are honoured. In the case of outstanding leave or lieu time,
employees should be required to take the time off during the notice period and only when
the notice period is insufficient to allow this to happen should payments in lieu be made. In
many cases following their dismissal, employees will not be required to work their notice
and will spend the period on "garden leave" during which any outstanding leave or lieu
days will be taken.
Where dismissal is as a consequence of gross misconduct, the question of withholding
payments may arise. Effectively, unless the written agreement of the employee has been
obtained, in the majority of cases this will only allow for the withholding of expenses
payments. It also allows for the non-payment of outstanding contractual leave entitlement,
although statutory leave entitlement must be paid.
Restitution in cases of fraud or theft
Where an employee has been dismissed as a consequence of an act of fraud or theft,
directorates may wish to consider whether it is appropriate to deduct the value of the
moneys and goods involved from any outstanding payments due to the employee with the
employee's agreement. Small sums can be recovered in this way, or by raising an invoice.
Where substantial sums are involved, the matter should be referred to Internal Audit to
15
consider whether it is appropriate to recover the moneys from the employees frozen
pension contributions under the Occupational Pensions Schemes (Assignments,
Forfeiture, Bankruptcy, etc.) Regulations 1997.
Capability cases - other sanctions available
Where an employee's work performance is unsatisfactory, serious consideration should be
given to adopting some or all of the following, as appropriate.
Annual increments - withhold annual increments.
Career grade - halt progression through the grade.
Sick notes - insist on their production for every sickness absence in cases where
there is excessive use of self-certification.
Occupational sick pay - withhold payment if the employee breaches any of the
qualifying conditions.
In most capability situations, it would be inconsistent to allow annual increments or
progression within a career grade. Furthermore, if incremental or career grade progression
is later reinstated, it should be from the current date and should not be back-dated.
Discipline cases - effects on pay and future promotion
Where disciplinary action has been taken against an employee, this will not normally have
implications for increments or progression through a career grade, although there may be
circumstances where such action can be reasonably justified. Directorates are advised to
consult HR Services where such action is being contemplated.
There have been cases where, having been issued with a formal warning or final warning,
an employee has applied for another post (sometimes, even a promotion post) during the
life of the warning. This is a difficult issue on which to issue specific guidance. The
Appointing Officer is entitled to consider the employee's disciplinary record in deciding
whether to interview or to make an appointment. There will be occasions when, because of
the nature of the post, e.g. infrequent supervision, it will be appropriate to expect an
employee to prove themselves trustworthy during the life of a warning before being
considered for such a post.
SAMPLE LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS
The wording and content of letters are extremely important. Disciplinary decisions and the
employee's rights in such circumstances must be conveyed in an accurate and
unambiguous manner. For this reason the procedure sets out the essential elements to be
included in all warning and dismissal letters. Nominated Officers should always refer to the
procedure when drafting letters. As a further aid, several example letters and documents
are attached.
16
Letter to confirm agreed action plan pre formal capability or disciplinary action being
taken
PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
Dear M_ ________,
Further to our discussion earlier today I have set out below the main points upon which we
agreed:1
All telephone calls should be answered with the minimum of delay and the Council's
telephone performance standards (copy attached) should be achieved.
All telephone calls should be answered with a clear and cheerful voice and the
following words should be used "Good morning (or afternoon), XXX Directorate, John
Smith speaking, how can I help you?"
If you are unable to deal with the caller yourself you must ensure that the call is
passed to a person who is able to deal with it or, if that is not possible, you must offer
to take a message for that person.
If you take a message from a telephone caller you must ensure that it is accurate and
legible and that it is placed prominently on the recipient's desk without delay.
At the earliest opportunity, I will arrange for you to receive telephone training in order
that you will be able to use the appropriate facilities on the new system.
You were advised that this letter would be sent to you. As explained, these are informal
targets, outside of the formal Capability [or Disciplinary, if appropriate] Procedure.
However, if matters do not improve, the formal procedure will be instigated.
Signed
[manager] _
Signed
[employee]
Date
_______________________
17
Dear M_ ________,
Further to our meeting earlier today to discuss your failure to complete your job cards
correctly you informed me that this had been common practice for several years and had,
in the past, been condoned by certain members of the management team.
I have looked into this claim and find that it was indeed the case. However, I am writing to
confirm that you must, from now onwards, ensure that you complete your job cards on
completion of each job and ensure that they are signed by the customer before you leave
the premises.
I have also seen your colleagues and have written to them along similar lines so that there
can be no misunderstanding in the future.
If you experience any problems in meeting these new requirements you should contact me
at the earliest opportunity.
Yours sincerely,
[Manager]
18
Dear M_ ________,
I have been informed by M_ ________, the ________ of an incident that took place on
[date] involving yourself and M_ ________.
An investigation will be carried out into this incident by M_ ________ as soon as possible
and I enclose a copy of a document entitled Information for Employees which sets out
your rights and duties under the Councils Capability and Disciplinary Procedures and also
gives information which you may find useful.
Yours sincerely,
[Nominated Officer]
cc Human Resource Service
19
Dear M_ ________,
I have been informed by M_ ________, the ________ of an incident that took place on
[date] involving yourself and M_ ________. An investigation has been carried out into this
incident by M_ ________and a copy of the report is appended to this letter. The
investigation report indicates that M_ ________spoke to you about your failure to carry out
your duties as previously instructed and in response you:a) suggested that the work was allocated to you because it was particularly arduous,
b) used foul and abusive language when told again to carry out the work without delay;
and,
c) subsequently left the workplace without authorisation, at 3:40 p.m. and did not return to
work that day.
I write to inform you that a disciplinary hearing is to be held and you should attend my office
on [date] at [time] to discuss the above allegations in accordance with the Disciplinary
Procedure (copy enclosed). Also enclosed is a document entitled PROCEDURES FOR
HEARINGS AND APPEALS.
You are advised that the possible consequences arising from this hearing might be: [eg a
written warning, a final written warning, dismissal].
[Include the following paragraph if appropriate]
You are advised that if the allegation(s) is (are) found to be proven, and taking into account
the Final Written Warning you received on [Enter date], your employment may be
terminated.
[Include the following paragraph if appropriate]
You are advised that if the allegation(s) is (are) found to be proven, it will be considered
Gross Misconduct under the Councils Capability and Disciplinary Procedure and your
employment may be summarily terminated without notice.
You have the right to be represented or accompanied by a trade union official or a work
colleague.
Please let me know the identity of the trade union official or work colleague who will be
representing or accompanying you and confirm that you will be attending the hearing. You
should note that if you fail to attend without notice a decision will be made in your absence.
Yours sincerely,
[Nominated Officer]
cc Human Resource Service
20
21
22
23
24
25
I write to inform you that, in view of these complaints, you should attend my office on [date]
at [time] for a hearing to be held under the Capability Procedure (a copy of which is
enclosed). Also enclosed is a document entitled PROCEDURES FOR HEARINGS AND
APPEALS. The purpose of the hearing will be to establish whether or not there is a lack of
capability on your part and, if so, how to proceed.
You are advised that the possible consequences arising from this hearing might be: [eg a
written caution, a final caution, dismissal].
[Include the following paragraph if appropriate]
You are advised that if the allegation(s) is (are) found to be proven, and taking into account
the Final Caution you received on [Enter date], your employment may be terminated.
[Include the following paragraph if appropriate]
You are advised that if the allegation(s) is (are) found to be proven, it will be considered
Gross Incapability under the Councils Capability and Disciplinary Procedure and your
employment may be summarily terminated without notice.
You have the right to be represented or accompanied by a trade union official or a work
colleague.
[If applicable, add:- As you have indicated that you are to be represented by M_ ________,
a copy of this letter has been sent to your representative in accordance with the capability
procedure.]
Please let me know the identity of the trade union official or work colleague who will be
representing or accompanying you and confirm that you will be attending the hearing. You
should note that if you fail to attend without notice a decision will be made in your absence.
Yours sincerely,
[Nominated Officer]
cc Human Resource Service
26
27
28
29
30
31
You are entitled to be represented or accompanied at the appeal hearing by your trade
union representative or a work colleague.
When preparing and presenting your appeal, you must restrict your case to the grounds
of appeal which you notified to me in your letter.
If your full statement of case is not received by me by the deadline given above, you will
not be entitled to receive the management statement of case in advance of the hearing.
Any assertion made in the written or oral presentation of your case must be supported
by evidence in person or in writing.
You will not be able to produce a document in support of your case at the hearing
unless you have provided me with a copy of it in advance as requested above.
Similarly, you will not be allowed to call a witness in support of your case unless that
persons identity has been disclosed to me in advance as requested above.
Please let me know the identity of the trade union official or work colleague who will be
representing or accompanying you and confirm that you will be attending the hearing. You
should note that if you fail to attend without notice a decision will be made in your absence.
Yours sincerely,
[person arranging the appeal]
cc Human Resource Service
32
33
34