Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Throats in
vacuum?
1
1 National
Carlos A. Conde,
Abstract
This work pretend to clarify the existence conditions of wormholes throats and wormholes as global
configurations in general relativity under the assumptions of cylindrical and spherical symmetries. As
a brief review, is pointed out that cylindrical symmetric and static wormholes could exist without a
violation of the weak or null energy near the throat and can appear with less exotic sources than throats
with a spherical topology. Furthermore, is also mentioned that throats can exist in rotating cylindrical
wormholes with ordinary matter or even in vacuum, however there are some difficulties in obtainning
asymptotically flat wormholes configurations without exotic matter.
Introduction
and the purpose was to explain the fundamental particles such as electrons, in terms of space-times tunnels called Einstein-Rosen bridges later named as wormholes by John Wheleer as was mentioned. However
this study was abandoned because the wormhole radius was extremely small in such a way that even
the particles couldnt traverse. Later, this topic begins to called attention with a publication that was
written in 1987 by Michael Morris, Kip Thorne and
Uri Yertsever of the intitute of technology in California. This article came as a solicitude by Carl Sagan
to Thorne because he was looking a way to transport the heroin of his novel called contact through
interstellar distances at higher speed than light speed.
Thorne gave this problem to his students and teachers Michael Morris and Uri Yertsever who investigated that was possible to make this trip if a black
hole could remain open the necessary time for a spaceship traverse it. Thorne, Morris and Yertsever conlcude that for wormholes mantain open they needed
matter with negative energy density and thus violate
all the energy conditions which will be studied after.
This hypothetical matter was called exotic matter.
The possible appearence of a wormhole geometry is
ilustrated by figure 1:
In figure 1 the picture (a) depict flat configurations that contains a part having the shape of a thin
tube that join different universes, similarly in (b) appears a join between spherical universes (a dumbbelllike configuration) or a flat one with a spherical one
(c) ( a hanging-drop configuration) also distant regions of the same universe as (d) and (e). Having introducing these type of wormholes its appropriate to
define with more detail the taxonomy of wormholes.
The major phyletic division is the distinction between
To give some ideas on how wormholes became an important topic of study let begin with some historical
developments that gave rise to the advance in wormholes knowledge. The term wormhole was introduced by J.A. Wheleer in 1955 and today its adopted
as one feature of the space-time that connects two different large or infinite regions through a throat. The
term came from the following analogy: imagine that
the universe is the skin of an apple and a worm travels
on its surface. The distance between two points that
are located in diametrically opposite positions its
equal to half circumference of the apple if the worm
travels between this points. But instead of that, the
worm could dig a hole inside the apple and go directly
to the other point without walking around the surface. Clearly the distance in this case is like a shortcut between the points of displacement. As we see
later, wormholes seems to be tunnels or bridges that
could connect regions of the same Universe or also
regions of different Universes under some geometrical space-time configurations. The beginnings of
the wormholes arises shortly after Einstein published
his General Theory of Relativity when a Viennese
physicist called Ludwig Flamm noticed the simplest
and possible form of a black hole : the Schwarzschild
black hole. He discovered that Einstein equations admits a second solution, known as a white hole which
is connected to the entrance of a black hole through a
space-time duct. The entrance of the black hole and
the exit of the white hole could be in different parts of
the same Universe or in different Universes. In 1935,
Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen studied in detail
these connections (intra-universe and inter-universe)
processes. Besides, wormholes can divided into micrscopic and macroscopic subespecies, as an example
of micrscopic ones we have Wheleer wormholes, deriving their existence form the assumed vacuum fluctuations taking place in the spacetime foam and they
are also typically transient. In the other hand, one
can consider macroscopic wormholes a Lorentzian wormhole that is quasi-permanent and might be suitable
for human beings: traversable wormholes.
Figure 1: Wormholes configurations.
1.2
While there is nothing in principle to prevent Euclidean wormholes being quasi-permanent, objects of
this type are rarely considered. One either has to
restrict the class of manifolds under consideration
by assuming compatibility with the existence of a
Lorentzian metric or one has to face loss of the various topology change theorems. Euclidean wormholes are typically transient and they are commonly
thought of as instantons in the gravitational field.
They also have been of considerable interest to the
particle physics and relativity communities. Although
some authors like Matt Visser considered that the
theory of Eculidean wormholes seems to have some
speculative character. It rest on the dynamics and
the Euclidean formulation of quantum gravity. If
they do exist, their effects may be by those of some
more exotic configurations.
Lorentzian and Euclidian wormholes. This merely reflects whether or not the manifold in which the wormholes resides is a Lorentzian (pseudo Riemannian)
manifold or a true Riemannian manifold with Euclidian signature. As it is known, a Riemannian space
(or space-time) is a differentiable manifold of arbitrary dimension D equipped with a metric g of arbitrary signature. If it is positive-definite [the signature
(+ +...+)], the space is called Riemannian, in other
cases it is called pseudo-Riemannian. Physics seems
to study more space-time with Lorentzian signature
that means non positive-definite like (-,+,+,+) or
(+,-,-,-). As a preview working definition taken from
Visser, we say that a wormhole is any compact region of space-time with a topologically simple boundary but a topologically nontrivial interior. Let introduce some types of wormholes in which definitions
are taken from the book Lorentzian Wormholes, from
Einstein to Hawking. of Matt Visser.
1.1
Euclidean Wormholes
1.3
Lorentzian Wormholes
Lorentzian wormholes speciation occurs into permanent (quasipermanent) and transient verieties, each of which has intra-universe and interuniverse that we have mentioned before. Also each
subespecies arises in microscopic and macroscopic
varieties. A quasipermanent type of wormhole is in
essential a three-dimensional objects that exist for
a finite non-zero lenght of time. If one slices a region of space-time into spacelike hypersurfaces, and
each slice of space, thought as a three-dimensional
Riemannian manifold, contains a wormhole, then the
wormhole can be thought of as existing throughout
a certain duration of time. As opposed to quasipermanent one could imagine the possibility of a truley permanent wormhole that mantained the toplogical estrcture in time. Other type of wormhole is
the ones known as transient wormholes because they
pop into and out of existence, they are intrinsically
4-dimensional objects. Transient wormholes, beacuse
they certainly do not satisfy the classical topology
change theorems, require mutilation of classical general relativity to permit classical topology changing
2
= (c2 ) 2( + )/r
= b /(c2 r2
The proper time required to traverse the wormhole must be in a finite reasonably short time
(less than a year) measured by the traveler and
the observers that wait the return.
p = (r/2)[(pc2 ) ]
The matter and fields that generates the spaceMorris and Thorne also was very clever in their
time curvature cant violate the fundamental procedure to solve the field equations. Usually the
laws of physics and so the energy-momentum order was first assume some type of matter that one
tensor is constraint by the above conditions.
knows that can result in the searching geometry, then
calculate the corresponding energy-momentum ten Their formation must required a very less mass sor and derive state equations based on the physics
and time compared with these ones about the of that source. With the energy-momentum tensor
Universe.
one could generate in principle, solutions to Einstein
field equations. However, since they were looking for
1.3.1 Effects on the properties of geometry solutions with specific geometrical properties, they
and matter
change the procedure of solving these equations in
The metric required is the spherically symmetric and the following way: first assumed the existence of a
very well geometry behavior imposing some condistatic one in the form:
tions to b and functions based on the proporties
dr2
of traversable wormholes, then solve the field equa2
2
2
2
2
2 2 2
ds =
+ r (d + sin ()d ) e c dt
1 b/r
tions and analyzed the implications about , and p,
that means discuss if the energy-matter distribution
where = (r) and b = b(r) are arbitrary functions is reasonable.
called redshift and shape function respectively. An
imposed condition was that the field decay radially Spatial Geometry:
very fast so the space-time turns asymptotically flat,
i.e. :
Taking an equatorial slice of the geometry i.e. with
b/r 0
0 ;
when r
The procedure in obtaining the following equations is omitted in this text because is out of the
main purpose of the discussion, but one can deduce
them by taking account the spherically symmetric
metric given before and using the components of the
energy-momentum tensor in the Einstein equations
to obtain:
b = c2 r2
0
= (b r3 /[2r(r b)]
T U U =
(4)
T l l = ( + p)(U l )2 (6)
0 0 c2
> 0 (throat neighborhoodi.e.r = b = b0 )
|0 c2 |
(3)
This is the most important contraint, the problem
can be seen better with the energy density measured
by an observer that is moving through throat with a
radial velocity close to speed light:
T00 = 2 (0 c2 0 ) + 0
(5)
Energy Conditions
Before we start the analysis of some specific interested symmetries of wormholes , its important to
mentioned the concept of Energy conditions that is
associated with the Stress-Energy Tensor (SET) behaviour . As its known the SET (T ) is used to
described the flux of energy and lineal momentum of
a continuous distribution of matter being neccesary
in Einsteins equations. Consider for instance, what
are the conditions that T need to have in order
to satisfied the Einsteins equation. In general, one
could say that any metric is valid to solve the Einsteins equation. This is, compute the Einsteins tensor at first (G )with this metric and then demand
that T be equal to G so by Bianchis identity
T is conserved. However, this is just a mathematical consistence, but in the universe we must consider
some type of realistic sources of energy and momentum. So it is convenient to impose some energy
conditions that limit the arbitrariness of T . These
Some conditions are illustrated in figure 3 for per- the circles) are not part of the 2-D surface illustrated
fect fluids:
(7)
where u being an arbitrary admissible radial coordinate and d2 = d2 + sin2 d2 the element of solid
angle. The functions , and are independent of
the angular coordinates (, ) to maintain spherical
Figure 3: Energy conditions as applied to perfect symmetry, otherwise we just have different metrics
fluids, expressed as allowed regions of energy density for different points of this curved space-time. Furthermore, one can always choose the reference frame
and pressure p
(RF) in such a way that , and depend only on
.
the radial coordinate u and one can fix the choice of
this radial coordinate by postulating a relation be, ,. Also its usual the no3 Spherically symmetric spacetimes tween the functions
where dots and primes stand for /t and /u, respectively. One can see that if the metric is static
(time independence), the Ricci tensor is diagonal and
takes the new form:
h 00
i
0
0
0
0
R00 = e2 + (2 + )
h 00
i
00
0
0
0
0
0
R11 = e2 2 + + 2 2 + 2 (2 + )
h 00
i
0
0
0
0
R22 = e2 + (2 + ) = R33
(9)
If we calculate the curvature quantities as Riemann, Ricii, curvature scalar, Einstein tensor, in vacuum (T = 0), the solution of Einsteins equation
becomes the Schwarzschilds solution:
2GM
2GM 1 2 2 2
2
ds = 1
dt 1
dr r d
Furthermore, one also can compute the Einstein tenr
r
(10) sor components G and here its shown the components G11 and G11 that is of interest since it does not
2(u)
2(u)
2
3. e
= e
u : Isotropic coordinates, in contain second-order derivatives in u, thus for a static
which the spatial part of the metric is written in a metric:
comformally flat form:
0
0
0
G00 = e2 + e2 ( 2 )
(13)
dl2 = e2(u) (du2 + u2 d2 ) = e2(u) d~x2
(11)
2
where, in the three-dimensional linear element, Cartesian coordinates have been introduced: ~x = (x1 , x2 , x3 ).
4. (u) = 2(u) + (u) the harmonic coordinate
u is very convenient for solving problems with scalar
fields.
5. (u) = (u): the quasiglobal coordinate u.
G11 = e2 + e2 ( + 2 )
(14)
1
6. (u) = (u) the u is sometimes called torG = R g R
(16)
2
toise coordinate because in many important cases
the metric functions change very slowly when ex- Multiplying equation (15) by g it becomes:
pressed in terms of u.
1
Now, With the metric in (9) one could calculate
g R g g R + g g = g T (17)
2
the Ricci tensor with a mathematical symbolic pro
gram like Maple 16 and check that R as a matrix Thus,
1
array in the form:
(18)
R R + = T
2
0
1
2
3
R0
R0
R0
R0
Exchanging equation 18 becomes:
R1
1
R11
R12
R13
(19)
R R + = T
R =
(12)
2
R0
R21
R22
R23
2
Thus,
G + = T
(20)
R30
R31
R32
R33
with
with non-zero components:
1
G = R R
(21)
h
i
2
R00 = e2 2 +
+ 2 2 + 2 (2
+ )
+
So with equation (21) one can obtain (13) and (14).
h 00
i
0
0
0
0
2
Then, if one substitute (13) and (14) into (20):
e
+ (2 + )
h 0
i
0
0
0
0 0 ) 0
R01 = 2e2 (
G00 + = e2 +e2 ( 2 )+ = T00 (22)
h 0
i
0 0 ) 0
0
0
0
R10 = 2e2 (
G11 + = e2 +e2 ( +2 )+ = T11 (23)
h
i
R11 = e2
+ (2
+ )
+
h 00
i
where the prime denotes d/dr while the SET (Stress00
0
0
0
0
0
e2 2 + + 2 2 + 2 (2 + )
Energy
Tensor) in the present case corresponds to the
h
i
2
2
electromagnetic
field.
R2 = e
+ (2 + )
+
h 00
i
0
0
0
0
e2 + (2 + ) = R33
6
2 Sm
4
T =
;
S
=
L
gd
x
(25)
m
r(A 1) = r2 8GT0 0 r2 dr
g g
Z
r3
One obtain the following result for the SET:
= 8G T0 0 r2 dr
3
h
i
T = 4F F + F F
(26)
Z
r2
G
(A 1) =
8
T0 0 r2 dr
The Maxwell equations F = 0 must now be
3
r
written for the spherically symmetric case, so that
among the components of F only the ones describZ
r2
G
ing a radial electric field (F01 = F10 ) and a radial
A(r) = 1
8
T0 0 r2 dr
(33)
3
r
magnetic field (F23 = F32 ) can be nonzero. Let restrict to an electric field, so the Maxwell equations
By equation (27) and solving the integral:
yields
Z
Q2 2
r2
G
Qe+
Qe
A(r)
=
1
8
r dr
01 0
01
( gF ) = 0 F =
, F10 =
3
r
8r4
2
2
4r
4r
Z
where the constant Q is interpreted as an electric
1
r2 G 2
charge (using Heaviside units in electrodynamic). Fi Q
dr
A(r) = 1
3
r
r2
nally, the SET takes the form:
1 0 0
0
r2
G
2
A(r)
=
1
+ 2 Q2 + C
(34)
Q
0
1
0
0
3
r
T =
(27)
4
0
0
1
0
8r
Furthermore if we substract (28) and (29)
0 0 0 1
"
!
!#
0
0
Q2
0
1
1
2
1
2
.
Thus, T0 = T1 =
e2
+
=0
(35)
8r4
r2
r
r2
r
Its very convenient to solve the Einsteins equations
in curvature coordinates as was described. Thus, Thus,
i
2e2 h 0
0
equations (22) and (23) takes the form:
+ =0
(36)
r
!
0
0
0
1
2
1
Implies that + = 0 =
0
2
0
G0 + = e
=
T
(28)
0
r2
r
r2
As a result of the integration in (32), the metric
finally
takes the generally form:
!
0
1
2
1
G11 + = e2
2 + = T11 (29)
+
dr2
2
r
r
r
r2 d2
ds2 = A(r)dt2
(37)
A(r)
1
1
00
0
where r e = lnr ; = ; = 2 .
where:
r
r
Lets write equation (28) in a different form, so first
if we calculate the quantity:
d 2
0
r(e
1) = e2 2 re2 1
dr
A(r) = 1
(38)
(30)
Its easy to verify the Schwarzschild solution by making in the equation (38): = 0, Q = 0 and so the
metric (37) turns into equation (10) as expected.
1)
= ( + T0 0 )
r2 dr
r2 2GM
G
+ 2 Q2
3
r
r
(31)
3.1
(40)
00
= 2A = 8G( + pr )
(48)
r
where it differs from the Minkowski flat-space met0
1
ric only by the emergence of the term a2 . However, where T0 = and T1 = pr . Taking in mind the
this drastically changes the geometry: at a = 0 we conditions in equations (43), so that implies that if:
have the Minkowski space-time, and the coordinate
00
r
u changes from zero to infinity, u = 0 is a regular
2A > 0
( + pr ) < 0
(49)
r
center, and an extension to negative values of u is
meaningless. But, if a > 0, the valueu = 0 is a regu1
lar minimum of the function r(u) = u2 + a2 , i.e., a Now, computing the component G1 of the Einsteins
throat, nothing prevents consideration of u < 0 and tensor one obtain:
i
1 h
0
0
0
u is again a spatial infinity of the same kind
G11 = 2 1 + A rr + Ar 2 = 8Gpr
(50)
r
as that at u +.
So, the other condition implies that:
Assume the the general form of the SET compatipr < 0
(51)
ble with this kind of symmetry is :
R00
(u)
0
0
0
0
p
(u)
0
0
r
=
0
0
p (u)
0
0
0
0
p (u)
R11
Furthermore, the condition in (49) implies the viNotice that in the last equations for the metric
olation of Null Energy Condition (NEC). For all null (54) its shown the non-zero components in a general
vectors:
form without specifying the choice of the radial coordinate u. Furthermore, is helpful to identify the
T l l 0, l : l l = 0
(52) component G1 because does not contain any second1
order derivatives. In particular, if we choose u as
In the metric (39), for the null vector
a harmonic radial coordinate i.e. making (u) =
l = (e , e , 0, 0) this condition takes the form: (u) + (u) + (u) the expressions for R00 , R22 , R33
do not contain first-order derivatives. Computing the
T00 T11 0
(53) Ricci components with u as the harmonic radial coordinate:
And for the tensor (41) it reads + pr 0 contrary
00
to (49). Thus the wormhole existence requires NEC R00 = e222
violation.
R11 =
h 00
i
00
00
0
0
0
0 0
e222 + + + 2 2 2
00
2
222
As in the case of spherically symmetry one could find R2 = e
a metric for a cylindrical symmetry in the form:
00
R33 = e222
0
0
0
compute the non-zero components of the Ricci tensor
0 pr
0
0
(55)
T =
that are simply the diagonal:
0
0
pz
0
h 00
0
i
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
R00 = e2 + + +
Also the Einsteins equations can be written as:
00
00
00
0
0
0
R11 = e2 [ + + + 2 + 2 + 2
1
0
0
0
0
R = T ;
T = T T
(56)
( + + )]
2
i
0
h 00
0
0
0
0
R22 = e2 + + +
Replacing R33 in the last equation (56):
i
h 00
0
0
0
0
0
R33 = e2 + + +
R33 = T33
1 3
3
= T3 3 T
where the prime denotes d/du. Computing also the
2
non-zero components of the Einsteins tensor G =
1
3
1
= T3 T
R R :
2
2
1 0
3
1
2
3
= T3
T + T1 + T2 + T3
G00 =h
2 0
i
00
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
0
e2 + 2 + + 2 +
1 0
1
2
3
= T0 + T1 + T2 T3
2
h 0 0
i
0 0
0 0
0
1
2
G1 = e
+ +
= T0 + T11 + T22 T33
2
But, R33 < 0 thus T00 + T11 + T22 T33 < 0 beG22 =h
i
00
0
0 0
0 0
00
0 0
0
cause > 0. Therefore with (55):
e2 + 2 + + + 2
pr pz + p < 0
G33 =h
i
00
0
0 0
0 0
00
0 0
0
e2 + 2 + + + 2
(57)
The last result implies the violation of the Dom- Thus, pr < 0. In addition, substituting + = 0
inant Energy Condition (DEC, see page 4) if one as- into the Einstein equation G11 = T11 is obtained:
sume, as usual, 0. The condition above is known
0
0 0
0 0
G11 = e2 + +
as a r-throat. Now let discuss another type of throat
| {z }
=0
in terms of the area function a(u) instead of r(u). In
0 0 2
0
this case one call it an a-throat for clarity.
=e
= 2 e2 0
|{z}
Definition: In a space-time with the metric (54),
an a-throat is a cylinder u = u1 where the function
a(u) = e(u)+(u) has a regular minimum.
Thus |{z}
T11 0 T11 0 that means:
>0
(r throat)
(59)
< pr 0
(a throat)
(60)
Thus, for a regular minimum the necessary conditions
are:
Thus, an r-throat does not necessarily requiere violation of any of the standard energy conditions, whereas
0
0
00
00
+ = 0 ; + > 0.
(58) at and near an a-throat there is always a region with
negative energy density .
The minimum occurs in terms of any admissible coordinate u, in particular, in terms of the harmonic
All that concerned only local conditions at the throat.
coordinate ( = + + ). Taking into account the
However, to describe a wormhole as a global entity,
conditions in (58) one can calculate R22 + R33 :
it is mandatory to consider the geometry far form
the throat, on both sides of it. One can consider
=0
a situation in which the wormhole is observed as a
z }| {
00
0
0
0
0
0
stringlike source of gravity form an otherwise very
R22 + R33 = e2 + + +
weakly curved or even flat environment. Thus, it
00
is required the existence of two spatial infinities on
0
0
0
0
0
+ + + +
both sides of the throat, i.e. such values u = u
| {z }
=0
that r = e and the metric is either flat or cor
00
0
0
0
responds to the gravitational field of a cosmic string.
= e2 +
First, at u u , a correct behaviour of clocks
00
and rulers requires || < and || < i.e:
0
0
0
+ +
const, const as u u . Choosing proper
scales, one can turn this constants to zero, but if
00
00
0
0
0
0
2
=e
+ + +
a wormhole has two such asymptotics, this opera| {z }
=0
tion, in general , can be done only at one of them.
00
00 2
In the other hand, at large r it is required that:
= + e
<0
0
| {z }
| |e 1 , = const < 1 as x x . So
>0
that the circumference-to-radius ratio for the circles
On the other hand, using equation (56) and comput- u = const, z = const tends to 2(1 ) instead
ing R22 + R33 :
of 2 wich should be the case if the space-time is
asymptotically
flat. Thus, the parameter is an an
0
1
2
3
2
3
gular defect. Uunder the last asymptotic conditions
R2 + R3 =
T0 + T1 + T2 T3
2
with > 0 and = 0 the solution can simulate
a cosmic string and a flat spatial respectively. No+ T00 + T11 T22 + T33
tice that negative values of are also not a priori
0
1
excluded,
they correspond to an angular excess. Sec= |{z}
T0 + T1 < 0
ond, the Riemann curvature tensor, hence the Ricci
>0
tensor, should vanish at large r, and, due to the
Einstein equations, all SET components must decay
quickly enough. One could verify that in the coordinates ( = + + ) a regular asymptotic (in
10
Where all metric coefficients depend on the radil coordinate u and the presence of the term dtd indicates the rotational effect in coordinate. If one
5.1 Tetrads
make t = const in the metric (63) one obtain the 3-D
In the standard approach, General Relativity is for- metric in the spatial coordinates:
mulated as a theory of the metric i.e. the main
BD + E 2 2
variable is the metric tensor g, while the connection
dl2 = Adu2 + Cdz 2 +
d
(64)
D
and the curvature are expressed in terms of the metric. There is an alternative formulation of General The development of the following procedure is to disRelativity that replaces the choice of a coordinate cuss the general conditions for the existence of cylinbasis by the less restricted choice of a local basis for drical wormholes with the stationary metric in (63)
the tangent bundle, i.e. a locally defined set of four with rotation and try to obtain a wormhole model
linearly independent vector fields called a tetrad. The with two flat asymptotic regions without invoking exadvantage of the tetrad formalism over the standard otic matter.
coordinate-based approach to general relativity lies
in the ability to choose the tetrad basis to reflect im- 5.2 Basic relations for stationary rotating
cylindrically symmetric space-times
portant physical aspects of the spacetime. For convenience, we will restrict attention on a 4-D manifold
Rewriting equation (63) in a slightly different notawith a Lorentzian metric signature (+ ). Gention, singling out the 3-D linear element:
eralizations in other dimensions with different metrics
can be made also.
ds2 = Adu2 + Cdz 2 + r2 d2 D[dt (E/D)d]2
Let M a differential manifold with a metric ten= e2 du2 + e2 dz 2 + e2 d2 e2 (dt Ee2 d)2
sor g so one can always choose an ortonormal ba(65)
sis {e0 (p), e1 (p), e2 (p), e3 (p)} in each tangent space
Tp M so the elements of the ortonormal basis are vec- where A,B,C,D,E as well as , , , are functions
tor fields and p represent the specific point in M. of the radial coordinate x1 = u, x4 = t is the time
Because one choose a Lorentzian signature for g one coordinate and the different notations are related by:
of the tetrad vector mus be time-like and the other
A = e2
C = e2
D = e2
three must be spacelike. Is useful to choose e0 as the
e = r(u)
r2 = /D
= BD + E 2
(66)
timelike vector and the other three spacelike so:
g(ea , eb ) = ab diag(1, 1, 1, 1)
g = |det(g )| = AC = e2+2+2+2
(67)
where ab is understood as a fixed matrix (which
is numerically the same as the standard metric in
In the gauge A = C ( = ) the vortex =
Minkowski spacetime).
is:
0
11
E D ED
1
0
= (Ee2 ) e .
2
2D A
(68)
00
00
02
02
= 8G
R11 = e2 [ + + + + + ( + )]+2 2
(69)
0
0
0
2
2 00
R2 = e
[ + ( + )]
(70)
0
#
"
0
0
h 0
i0
DB + EE
3
= e+ Ee
gR3 =
2
(71)
" 0
#0
0
h 0
i0
D B + EE
4
gR4 =
= e+ Ee
2
(72)
"
#0
0
0
0
DE + ED
3
gR4 =
= e2+
(73)
2
" 0
#0
0
B E + BE
4
gR3 =
(74)
2
E 3
(R R44 )
(82)
D 3
Thus, if the diagonal components of the Einsteins
equations have been solved the component (43 ) holds
and need not be considered. The same relations holds
for the SET components T34 .
R34 =
0
(Ee ) = 202 e3 = 2 2 e2++ = 2 2 g. (76) of u containing u0 , all metric functions in (65) are
smooth and finite (which guarantees regularity and
Also, in an arbitrary gauge the diagonal components absence of horizons). The cylinder u = u0 is then
called a throat (or an r-throat).
of the Ricci tensor can be written as follows:
The diagonal part of the T in the most general
00
00
02
02
02
1
2 00
form:
R1 = e
[ + + + + +
0
( + + )] + 2 2
R22
(77)
= 1
(78)
R33
= 1 + 2
R44
= 1 2 2
() G
T22 = pz ,
T33 = p ,
T44 = . (83)
0
0 0
where for any f (u), 1 f = g 1/2 [ gg 11 f ] =
00
0
0
0
0
0
e2 [f + f ( + + )]. The Ricci tensor
can split into the static part (s) R and the rotational
part () R = 2 diag(2, 0, 2, 2). The coordinates
are ordered as follows: (u, z, , t). The corresponding Einstein tensor G splits in a similar manner,
G = [(s) G ]+[() G ],
T11 = pr ,
= 2 diag(1, 1, 1, 3).
(81)
Where the tensors (s) G and () G satisfy the conservation law G = 0 with respect to the static
metric (65) with E 0.
pr pz + p 2 2 / < 0
(84)
12
the existence conditions of an a-throat. By definition this case three of the four diagonal components of
0
0
00
00
2, at u = u1 one have + = 0 and + = 0. (90) for a masless scalar field give:
The minimum occurs in any admissible coordinate u,
00
R2 22 = 0 = 0
(92)
in particular, in temrs of the armonic coordinate. Using it in the Einsteins equation and with (78), (79)
00
00
00
R33 = 0 2 2 e2 = 0
(93)
it is found that the condition + implies:
00
4
2 2
R4 = 0 + 2 e = 0
(94)
00
00
R22 + R33 = e2 ( + ) + 2 2 < 2 2
(85)
Thus, it follows:
And thus,
= mu [with a certain choice of z scale] (95)
T11 + T44 = pr < 2 2 /
0
(86)
02
G11 = e2 + 2 = e2 + 2 2
(87)
00
00
= 402 e22
(97)
k > 0, u R+ ;
k sinh(ku),
to have a regular asymptotic behavior far form the
u,
k = 0, u R+ ;
throat i.e. const while r , then it will be a s(k, u) =
1
k sin(ku),
k < 0, 0 < u < /|k|.
wormhole geometry by both definitions.
And thus,
5.4
Vacuum and massless scalar field sogration constants have been suppressed by choosing
lutions
=
0,
whence = Cu (fixing the inessential zero
And it is very convenient to use Einsteins equations
point
of
);
the constant C has the meaning of scalar
in the form:
charge density. Lastly, the Einstein equation G11 =
1
1
R = (T T ) = ( V ). (91) T1 which is first-order, leads to a relation between
2
the integration constants:
References
[1] M. Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes: from Einstein
to Hawking (AIP, Woodbury, 1995).
[2] K. A. Bronnikov and S. G. Rubin, Black Holes,
Cosmology and Extra Dimensions (World Scientific,
2012).
[3] K. A. Bronnikov and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev.
D 79, 104019 (2009); arXiv: 0902.2360.
[4] V. G. Krechet and D. V. Sadovnikov, Grav.
Cosmol. 15, 337 (2009), arXiv: 0912.2181.
[5] K. A. Bronnikov, V. G. Krechet, and J. P. S.
Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 87, 084060 (2013); arXiv:
1303.2993.
[6] K. A. Bronnikov, M.V. Skvortsova; arXiv:
1404.5750.
[7] V. G. Krechet, Izv. Vuzov, Fiz. No. 10, 57
14