You are on page 1of 35

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 35 Page ID #:1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP


Marcus J. Bradley, Esq. (SBN 174156)
Kiley L. Grombacher, Esq. (SBN 245960)
29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208
Agoura Hills, California 91301
Telephone: (818) 991-8080
Facsimile: (818) 991-8081
mbradley@marlinsaltzman.com
kgrombacher@marlinsaltzman.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Heather Schourup
(Additional counsel on next page)

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
PRIVATE LABEL
)
NUTRACEUTICALS LLC d/b/a
)
)
MRITZMAYER
)
LABORATORIES, a Georgia
)
limited liability company; and DOES )
)
1 through 10, inclusive,
)
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
HEATHER SCHOURUP, on behalf
of herself and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

CASE NO.
CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES,
EQUITABLE, DECLARATORY AND
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF:
1. Breach of Express Warranty in
Violation of Commercial Code 2313;
2. Deceit in Violation of Civil Code
1710(2);
3. Concealment in Violation of Civil Code
1710;
4. Violation of the Unfair Competition
Law, Bus. & Prof. Code 17200, et
seq.;
5. Violation of the False Advertising Law,
Bus. & Prof. Code 17500, et seq.;
6. Violation of the Consumers Legal
Remedies Act, Civil Code 1750, et
seq.;
7. Breach of Implied Warranties;
8. Breach of Implied Warranty of Fitness;
9. Violation Of Magnuson Moss Warranty
Act, 15 U.S.C. 2301, et seq.; and,
10. Negligence
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

28

Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 2 of 35 Page ID #:2


1

Additional Attorneys for Plaintiff

HARTMANN & KANANEN


Ronald A. Hartmann, Esq. (Bar No. 115683)
Kurt E. Kananen, Esq. (Bar No. 156136)
Kenneth King, Esq. (Bar No. 245961)
5743 Corsa Avenue, Suite 119
Westlake Village, California 91362
Telephone: (818) 710-0151
Facsimile: (818) 710-0191
constructiondefects@sbcglobal.net
kurtkananen@sbcglobal.net
kkinghk@sbcglobal.net

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 3 of 35 Page ID #:3


1

Plaintiff Heather Schourup brings this action against Defendants Private

Label Nutraceuticals LLC d/b/a Mritzmayer Laboratories (Private Label) and

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive (collectively Defendants), as follows:

This is a class action on behalf of California and Nationwide consumers

who, within the last four (4) years, purchased Defendants green coffee

bean extract product. Defendants green coffee bean extract product is sold

throughout the United States, including California.

among other things, equitable and injunctive relief, restitution of all

amounts illegally retained by Private Label, and disgorgement of all ill-

10

gotten profits from Private Labels wrongdoing.

11

1.

This action seeks,

Plaintiff Heather Schourup (Plaintiff) is currently, and at all times

12

relevant was, a resident of San Dimas, California. Within the last four (4) years,

13

Plaintiff purchased several bottles of Defendants green coffee bean extract

14

products for personal use.

15

2.

Private Label Nutraceuticals LLC d/b/a Mritzmayer Laboratories is

16

a limited liability company with its principal place of business in Roswell,

17

Georgia. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that a substantial

18

portion of the activities at issue in this Complaint occurred in California.

19

3.

The use of the term Defendant or Defendants in any of the

20

allegations in this Complaint, unless specifically alleged otherwise, is intended to

21

include and charge, both jointly and severally, not only the Defendants identified

22

in this Complaint, but also all Defendants designated as DOES 1 through 10,

23

inclusive, as though the term Defendants was followed in each and every

24

instance throughout this Complaint with the phrase "and each of them jointly and

25

severally, including all named Defendants and Defendants included herein and

26

sued under the fictitious names of DOES 1 through 10, inclusive.

27
28

4.

Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendants, at all times herein mentioned, were the partners, joint venturers,
1
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 4 of 35 Page ID #:4


1

subsidiaries, successors in interest, managing agent, merged entities, agents, alter

egos, part of a jointly owned, managed, and/or operated business enterprise,

and/or employees of each other Defendant and in doing the acts, omissions, and

things alleged herein were acting as such and within the scope of their authority as

such agents and employees and with the permission and consent of all other

Defendants.

Defendants have, and at all times herein mentioned had, a joint economic and

business interest, goal and purpose in the Private Labels Green Coffee Extract

Product line of supplements that are the subject of this lawsuit.

10
11

Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

JURISDICTION AND VENUE


5.

This Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

12

1332(d)(2), as amended by the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, because the

13

matter in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds the sum or value of

14

$5,000,000, and is a class action where Plaintiff and class members are from a

15

different state than Defendants.

16

citizens of a state different from Defendants. This Court also has original

17

jurisdiction under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

18

'1331 and 2310(d)(1)(b). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the state

19

law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367.

20

6.

Further, all other members of the class are

This Court also has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

21

1332(a)(1) because Plaintiff and the putative class are citizens of the State of

22

California, Defendants reside in the state of Georgia and the amount in

23

controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs.

24
25
26

7.

Personal jurisdiction is derived from the fact that Defendants conduct

business within the State of California and within this judicial district.
8.

Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2)

27

because many of the acts and transactions occurred in this district and because

28

Defendants:
2
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 5 of 35 Page ID #:5


1

a.

are authorized to conduct business in this district and have

intentionally availed themselves of the laws and markets within this district

through the promotion, marketing, distribution and sale of their products in

this district;

b.

do substantial business in this district;

c.

advertise to consumers residing in this district; and

d.

are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

9.

Green coffee bean extract has garnered national attention as a

10

purported weight-loss supplement. "Green coffee" refers to the raw or unroasted

11

seeds (beans) of Coffea fruits. In the typical roasting process of coffee beans, a

12

chemical called chlorogenic acid is reduced. Researchers theorize that chlorogenic

13

acid may be responsible for the pharmacological effects of green coffee extract.

14

10.

It is theorized that chlorogenic acid may promote weight loss by

15

blocking fat absorption in the body as well as by boosting metabolism. See

16

http://www.privatelabelnutra.com/private-label-nutraceuticals-expands-top-

17

selling-green-coffee-bean-extract-product-line-i-50.html (last viewed January 13,

18

2015)

19

11.

Defendants have developed, marketed and distributed supplements

20

which purportedly contain green coffee extract. Such products include, but are

21

not limited to: Mritzmayer Laboratories Green Coffee Bean Extract, Pure

22

Ultra**Green Coffee Bean Extract, Pure Super Green Coffee Extract, Pure Green

23

Coffee Bean Extract Lean, Super Green Coffee Bean Extra (Private Labels

24

Green Coffee Extract Product Line).

25

12.

By making the Green Coffee Extract" claims, Defendants were

26

attempting to tap into the growing market for the perceived health benefits of

27

"Green Coffee Extract" in order to promote the sale of Private Labels Green

28

Coffee Extract Product.


3
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 6 of 35 Page ID #:6


1

13.

At all times relevant to the matters alleged in this Complaint,

Defendants have made, and continue to make, misrepresentations and/or

omissions regarding the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product Line of

supplements. Specifically, Defendants represent, through marketing, advertising,

packaging, labeling, and other forms of marketing, advertising, and promotions,

that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product Line contains green coffee

extract. This representation is featured on the front label of all the products subject

to this litigation. The representation also appears on the side label of the

packaging for the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product Line. The side

10

representation provides the quantity of green coffee extract which Defendants

11

represent and warrant that the product contains. The weight-loss benefits are

12

reinforced with the imagery of a trim waist with a tape measure around it.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

14.

In fact, the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product Line of

24

supplements: (1) contain little to no chlorogenic acidthe effective ingredient in

25

green coffee extract; (2) contain a sugar compound similar to Maltose; and (3) do

26

not contain green coffee extract.

27
28

15.

At all relevant times, Defendants knew, or reasonably should have

known, that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product Line of products did
4
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 7 of 35 Page ID #:7


1

not contain chlorogenic acid and/or only contained trace amounts of chlorogenic

acid and did not truly contain green coffee extract as represented by Defendants

and Defendants purposely failed to disclose these material facts to its customers.

Additionally, Defendant failed to disclose the presence of contaminants such as

sugar compounds. Despite that Defendants knew, or should have known, that the

Private Labels Green Coffee Extract Product did not contain chlorogenic acid

and/or only contained trace amounts of chlorogenic acid and did not truly contain

green coffee extract, Defendants at all relevant times, labeled, marketed,

advertised, and promoted the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of

10

products as containing "green coffee extract. To this day, Defendants have taken

11

no meaningful steps to clear up Plaintiffs and members of the classes

12

misconceptions regarding their Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products.

13

16.

At all relevant times, Defendants represented that their Private Label

14

Green Coffee Extract Products were green coffee extract and contained 800mg

15

of green coffee extract per serving. Instead, Defendants Green Coffee Extract

16

Product did not contain green coffee extract and only contained trace amounts of

17

chlorogenic acid. One study commissioned by Plaintiff and performed by a third

18

party lab shows that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product Line

19

contained a sugar compound similar to Maltose.

20

disclosed the presence of the sugar compound.

21

17.

Defendants labeling never

By claiming that Private Labels Green Coffee Extract Product were

22

green coffee extract and that the products contain 800 mg of green coffee

23

extract per serving, Private Label's statements and representations of the

24

standards, qualities, nature, ingredients, characteristics, grade, affirmations of fact,

25

and promises regarding Private Labels Green Coffee Extract Product

26

supplements, as alleged in this Complaint, constituted a warranty and

27

representation to consumers.

28

18.

Plaintiff and reasonable consumers must and do rely on supplement


5
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 8 of 35 Page ID #:8


1

companies such as Private Label to honestly state the nature of a supplements

qualities and ingredients, and companies such as Private Label intend and know

that consumers rely upon statements made on packaging and labels in making

their purchasing decisions. Such reliance by consumers is reasonable because

companies are prohibited from making false or misleading statements on their

products' labels under federal and state law.

19.

Defendants labeling, marketing, promoting, advertised, etc., of the

Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products as containing green coffee extract

violates the following laws, among others:

10

21 CFR 1.Cal. Commercial Code 2313;

11

Cal. Civ. Code 1710;

12

Cal. Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Civil Code 1750, et seq.);

13

Cal. Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17200, et seq.);

14

Cal. False Advertising Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17500, et seq.);

15

California common law of express and implied warranties;

16

Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act;

17

Other laws, including the California Common Law.

18

20.

Defendants selected the products name and designed the labels and

19

packaging in order to maximize the label's/packagings deceptive impact upon

20

Plaintiff and members of the Class. Federal laws and FDA regulations did not

21

require Defendants to choose the phrase "Green Coffee Bean Extract" and place

22

that phrase prominently on the packaging for the Private Label Green Coffee

23

Extract products.

24

strategy.

25

product contains green coffee extract.

26

advertising, labeling, as well as their statements of the standards, qualities,

27

characteristics, grade, affirmations of fact, and promises, is designed to cause

28

consumers to buy the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products as a result of

Defendants made that decision because of their marketing

Defendants' marketing misleads consumers into believing that their


Defendants' marketing, promotion,

6
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 9 of 35 Page ID #:9


1

this deceptive message. Consumers' confusion is reasonable given that some

companies are selling supplements that contain green coffee extract. Defendants

affirmative decision to label the subject products "Green Coffee Extract" was and

is misleading, given that the subject products contain a sugar compound similar to

Maltose and not green coffee extract. The FDA does not require Defendants to

make the affirmations of fact and label their products as Green Coffee Extract.

The foregoing affirmations of fact and statements of quality are voluntarily placed

on the subject products labels.

21.

Defendants representations regarding the subject Private Label

10

Green Coffee Extract Product supplements are false, misleading and/or fail to

11

disclose material facts. Defendants knew, or should have known, and/or were

12

reckless in not knowing and disclosing, that the Private Label Green Coffee

13

Extract Products contained a sugar compound and/or contained only trace

14

amounts of chlorogenic acid. Defendants knew, or should have known, that their

15

representations of standards, qualities, characteristics, grade, affirmations of fact,

16

and promises regarding the subject supplements were likely to deceive consumers

17

into believing they were purchasing a supplement that contained green coffee

18

extract.

19

22.

Within the last 4 years, Plaintiff purchased for personal use several

20

bottles of Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product directly from Defendants.

21

Such product was shipped from Defendants directly to her home in California.

22

Prior to purchase, Plaintiff believed that Private Label Green Coffee Extract

23

Products contained green coffee extract.

24

23.

Plaintiff has caused bottles of Private Label Green Coffee Extract

25

Product to be tested by two independent labs. The results of these studies confirm

26

that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product do not conform to the

27

advertisements, representations and warranties of by Defendants regarding green

28

coffee extract in the product.


7
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 10 of 35 Page ID #:10


1

24.

Had Plaintiff known the truth, namely, that the Private Label Green

Coffee Extract Products contained only trace amounts of chlorogenic acid and

contained little to no green coffee extract, she would not have purchased the

Private Label Green Coffee Extract. As a consequence, Plaintiff has lost money

in the form of paying for the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products rather

than not buying the product at all. Plaintiff did not receive the product for which

she bargained.

25.

As a consequence of Defendants unfair, unlawful and deceptive

practices as alleged in this Complaint, Plaintiff and members of the Class have

10

purchased the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products under the false

11

impression that products contained green coffee extract. Each consumer has been

12

exposed to the same material misrepresentations, misleading representations,

13

and/or omissions which are displayed on the product packaging for the Private

14

Label Green Coffee Extract Product line, prior to purchasing the product.

15

26.

As a result of Defendants representations and/or omissions regarding

16

the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products, Plaintiff and members of the

17

Class overpaid for the product because the value of the product was diminished at

18

the time it was sold to consumers. Had Plaintiff and members of the Class been

19

made aware that the product contained a sugar compound similar to Maltose and

20

not green coffee extract, they would not have purchased the product, would have

21

paid less for it, or would have purchased another competing product. For the

22

reasons alleged in this Complaint, the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product

23

was worth less than what Plaintiff and members of the Class paid for it. Plaintiff

24

and members of the Class purchased Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products

25

instead of competing products based on the false statements, misrepresentations

26

and omissions described herein.

27

receive what they paid for, and Plaintiff and the Class members have suffered an

28

injury in fact as a result of Defendants mislabeling, misrepresentations and/or

Thus, Plaintiff and Class members did not

8
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 11 of 35 Page ID #:11


1

omissions.

27.

On February 11, 2015, Plaintiff, behalf of herself and all Class

members, pursuant to the California Legal Remedies Action ("CLRA"), California

Civil Code 1750, et seq., notified Defendants of the matters alleged in this

Complaint, namely, that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products have

been falsely and misleadingly labeled as Green Coffee Bean Extract" and

represented that the products contained green coffee bean extract.

written CRLA notice to Defendants requested that Defendants take the following

steps to cure this defect: remove the green coffee bean extract representations,

10

provide an accounting of Defendants profits from the sale of Private Label Green

11

Coffee Extract Products, pay restitution to Plaintiff and all other putative Class

12

members, recall the mislabeled products, and agree not to promote, market,

13

advertise, and/or label the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products as

14

containing green coffee bean extract. The statutory time period for Defendants to

15

comply has not yet lapsed. Should Defendant fail to cure these defects, Plaintiff

16

intends to amend her complaint in order to seek damages under the CLRA.

17

28.

Plaintiff's

In June of 2012, Plaintiff gave notice of the alleged defect in the

18

products and thus, satisfies any pre-suit filing notice requirements in relation to

19

her warranty claims.

20

CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

21

29.

Plaintiff brings this suit as a class action on behalf of herself and on

22

behalf of others similarly situated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), 23(b)(2),

23

and/or 23(b)(3). Subject to additional information obtained through further

24

investigation and/or discovery, the foregoing definition of the Class may be

25

expanded or narrowed. Plaintiff brings this suit on behalf of a proposed nation-

26

wide class and a California Sub-Class (collectively the Classes) defined as

27

follows:

28

///
9
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 12 of 35 Page ID #:12


1

Class:

All persons residing in the United States who purchased any of

Private Labels Green Coffee Extract Product products within four

(4) years of the date this Complaint is filed. Excluded from the Class

are (1) the defendants, the defendants' employees, officers, directors,

principals, legal representatives, successors, assigns, subsidiaries,

affiliates, officers, or directors; (2) any entity which any defendant

has a controlling interest; and (3) the judge(s) to whom this action is

assigned and any members of their immediate families.

10

California Sub-Class:

11

All persons residing in the State of California who purchased any of

12

Private Labels Green Coffee Extract Products within four (4) years

13

of the date this Complaint is filed. Excluded from the Class are

14

(1) the defendants, the defendants' employees, officers, directors,

15

principals, legal representatives, successors, assigns, subsidiaries,

16

affiliates, officers, or directors; (2) any entity which any defendant

17

has a controlling interest; and (3) the judge(s) to whom this action is

18

assigned and any members of their immediate families.

19

30.

20
21

This action has been brought and may properly be maintained as a

class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 23, and the case law thereunder.
31.

Numerosity: The members of the Classes are so numerous that

22

joinder of all members is impracticable. The Classes are comprised of hundreds of

23

consumers throughout the United States.

24

32.

Commonality: Common questions of law and fact exist as to all

25

members of the Classes.

26

questions affecting only individual members of the Classes. These common legal

27

and factual questions include, but are not limited to, the following:

28

a.

These common questions predominate over the

Whether Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products contain


10
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 13 of 35 Page ID #:13


1
2

green coffee bean extract.


b.

Whether Defendants labeling/packaging of Private Label

Green Coffee Extract Product as "Green Coffee Bean Extract" is untrue, is

misleading, or is reasonably likely to deceive.

c.

Whether Defendants statements and representations of the

standards, qualities, characteristics, grade, affirmations of fact, and

promises regarding the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products as

alleged in this Complaint, are unlawful.

d.

Whether Defendants conduct constitutes an unlawful,

10

deceptive, and/or unfair act or practice within the meaning of California

11

Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq.

12

e.

Whether Defendants advertising, marketing, promotions, and

13

labeling is untrue and/or misleading within the meaning of California

14

Business & Professions Code 17500, et seq.

15
16
17

f.

Whether Defendants engaged in deceptive or unfair acts and

practices in violation of California Civil Code 1750, et seq.


g.

Whether Defendants statements and affirmations of fact are

18

common law and/or statutory express warranties, and whether Defendants

19

breached the express warranties.

20

h.

Whether Defendants breached the implied warranties.

21

i.

Whether Defendants, through their conduct alleged in this

22

Complaint, received money that, in equity and good conscience, belongs to

23

members of the proposed Classes.

24

j.

Whether Plaintiff and the other members of the Classes are

25

entitled to equitable relief including, but not limited to, restitution and/or

26

disgorgement.

27

k.

28

disgorgement.

The appropriate measure of damages and/or restitution

11
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 14 of 35 Page ID #:14


1

l.

Whether Plaintiff and members of the Classes are entitled to

injunctive relief, and if so, the appropriate injunctive relief.

33.

Predominance: These and other questions of law or fact which are

common to the members of the Classes predominate over any questions affecting

only individual members of the Classes.

34.

Typicality: Plaintiff's claims are typical of the claims of the members

of the Classes as all members of the Classes are similarly affected by Defendants

wrongful conduct. Plaintiff, like other members of the Classes, purchased Private

Label Green Coffee Extract Product after exposure to the same material

10

misrepresentations and/or omissions appearing on the product packaging, and

11

received a product that contains a sugar compound instead of green coffee bean

12

extract. Plaintiff is advancing the same claims and legal theories on behalf of

13

herself and all absent members of the Classes.

14

35.

Adequacy: Plaintiff's claims are made in a representative capacity on

15

behalf of the other members of the Classes. Plaintiff has no interests antagonistic

16

to the interests of the other members of the proposed Classes and is subject to no

17

unique defenses. Plaintiff is committed to the vigorous prosecution of this action

18

and has retained competent counsel experienced in the prosecution of class

19

actions.

20

Classes and will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Classes.

21

36.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is an adequate representative of the proposed


Superiority: A class action is superior to other available means for

22

the fair and efficient adjudication of this dispute. Joinder of all members is

23

impracticable. The damages suffered by each individual members of the Classes

24

likely will be relatively small, especially given the relatively small cost of the

25

supplements at issue and the burden and expense of individual prosecution of the

26

complex litigation necessitated by Defendants conduct.

27

virtually impossible for members of the Classes individually to effectively redress

28

the wrongs done to them. Moreover, even if members of the Classes could afford

Thus, it would be

12
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 15 of 35 Page ID #:15


1

individual actions, it would still not be preferable to class-wide litigation. The

burden of individual litigation on the court system would be significant.

Individualized actions present the potential for inconsistent or contradictory

judgments. By contrast, a class action presents far fewer management difficulties

and provides the benefits of single adjudication, economies of scale, and

comprehensive supervision by a single court. Moreover, given the relatively

small cost of the products at issue and the burden and expense attendant to

litigating the claims at issue in this litigation, in the absence of class litigation, it

would be virtually impossible for individual Class members to get redress.

10

37.

This suit may be maintained as a class action under Fed. R. Civ. Pro.

11

23(b)(2) because Defendants have acted, and/or refused to act, on grounds

12

generally applicable to the Classes, thereby making appropriate final injunctive

13

relief. Specifically, injunctive relief is necessary and appropriate to require

14

Defendants to:

15

a.

Discontinue advertising, marketing, promoting, labeling,

16

packaging and otherwise representing the Private Label Green Coffee

17

Extract Products as Green Coffee Bean Extract, and as containing green

18

coffee extract;

19

b.

Undertake an immediate public information campaign to

20

inform members of the proposed Classes as to their conduct as alleged in

21

this Complaint; and

22

c.

Correct any erroneous impression consumers may have

23

obtained concerning the nature, characteristics, or qualities of Private Label

24

Green Coffee Extract Products including without limitation, the placement

25

of corrective marketing, advertising, promoting, labeling, and packaging,

26

and providing written notice to the public.

27

///

28

///
13
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 16 of 35 Page ID #:16


1

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

BREACH OF EXPRESS WARRANTY,

CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL CODE 2313

(By Plaintiff and the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

5
6
7

38.

Plaintiff incorporates by reference each allegation contained in

preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.


39.

At all times relevant to the matters alleged in this Complaint,

Defendants have made, and continue to make, misrepresentations and/or

omissions regarding the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of

10

supplements. Specifically, Defendants represent, through marketing, advertising,

11

packaging, labeling, and other forms of marketing, advertising, and promotions,

12

that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of supplements is Green

13

Coffee Bean Extract and contains green coffee bean extract. These

14

representations and affirmations of fact constitute a part of the description of the

15

Green Coffee Extract Product line of supplements marketed and sold by

16

Defendants that became part of the basis of the bargain between Defendants, on

17

the one hand, and Plaintiff and all others similarly situated members of the

18

Classes, on the other hand.

19
20

40.

Commercial Code 2313 provides that:


(1) Express warranties by the seller are created as follows:

21

(a) Any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the

22

buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of

23

the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall

24

conform to the affirmation or promise.

25

(b) Any description of the goods which is made part of the

26

basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods

27

shall conform to the description.

28

(c) Any sample or model which is made part of the basis of the
14
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 17 of 35 Page ID #:17


1

bargain creates an express warranty that the whole of the goods

shall conform to the sample or model.

(2) It is not necessary to the creation of an express warranty that

the seller use formal words such as "warrant" or "guarantee" or

that he have a specific intention to make a warranty, but an

affirmation merely of the value of the goods or a statement

purporting to be merely the seller's opinion or commendation of

the goods does not create a warranty.

41.

Defendants breached the above warranties because they voluntarily

10

and affirmatively have made, and continue to make, misrepresentations and/or

11

omissions regarding the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of

12

supplements. Specifically, Defendants represent, through marketing, advertising,

13

packaging, labeling, and other forms of marketing, advertising, and promotions,

14

that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of supplements is a

15

Green Coffee Bean Extract and contained green coffee bean extract. In fact, the

16

Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of supplements contains a sugar

17

compound similar to Maltose, does not contain or contains only trace amounts of

18

chlorogenic acid and not green coffee bean extract. Defendants were aware of

19

these defects in their Green Coffee Extract Product line of supplements and, at all

20

relevant times, chose not to cure them.

21

42.

Plaintiff and other members of the Classes have been damaged by

22

Defendants breach of their express warranty obligations in an amount to be

23

determined at trial.

24

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

25

DECEIT IN VIOLATION OF CIVIL CODE 1710(2)

26

(By Plaintiff and the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

27
28

43.

Plaintiff incorporates by reference each allegation contained in

preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.


15
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 18 of 35 Page ID #:18


1

44.

Defendants have broadly disseminated and continue to make

misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the Private Label Green Coffee

Extract Product line of supplements. Specifically, Defendants represent, through

marketing, advertising, packaging, labeling, and other forms of marketing,

advertising, and promotions, that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product

line of supplements is a Green Coffee Bean Extract and/contains green coffee

bean extract. In fact, the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of

supplements contains a sugar compound similar to Maltose, contains no or only

trace amounts of chlorogenic acid and does not contain green coffee bean extract.

10
11
12

45.

Defendants knew that their assertions were false, but asserted such

facts nonetheless, with the intent to procure each consumer's business.


46.

Had Plaintiff and the members of the Classes known that Defendants

13

assertion was untrue, Plaintiff and the members of the Classes would not have

14

purchased Defendants Private Label Green Coffee Bean Extract line of

15

supplements.

16

47.

As a proximate result of Defendants deceit, as set forth above,

17

Plaintiff and each members of the Classes purchased Defendants Green Coffee

18

Extract Product line of supplements and have been damaged in an amount to be

19

proven at trial.

20

48.

Plaintiff and the members of the Classes are entitled to punitive

21

damages since Defendants willfully and fraudulently acted with malice,

22

oppression, and/or in conscious disregard for Plaintiff's and the members of the

23

Classes legal rights as a result of Defendants deceit, as set forth above.

24

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

25

CONCEALMENT CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 1710(3)

26

(By Plaintiff and the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

27
28

49.

Plaintiff incorporates by reference each allegation contained in

preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.


16
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 19 of 35 Page ID #:19


1

50.

At all times relevant to the matters alleged in this Complaint,

Defendants have made, and continue to make, misrepresentations and/or

omissions regarding the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of

supplements. Specifically, Defendants represent, through marketing, advertising,

packaging, labeling, and other forms of marketing, advertising, and promotions,

that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product line of supplements is Green

Coffee Bean Extract and contains green coffee bean extract.

Defendants Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products contain only trace

amounts of chlorogenic acid (or less), contains a sugar compound and does not

10

contain green coffee extract. Defendants were aware of these defects in their

11

Green Coffee Extract Product line of supplements and, at all relevant times, chose

12

not to cure them.

13

51.

Instead,

Defendants suppressed these facts from Plaintiff and the members of

14

the Classes with the intent to reap the financial windfall from the sale of

15

Defendants Green Coffee Extract Products that do not effectively perform as

16

represented.

17

52.

As a proximate result of Defendants concealment, as set forth above,

18

Plaintiff and each member of the Classes purchased Defendants Green Coffee

19

Extract Products and have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.

20

53.

Plaintiff and each members of the Classes are entitled to punitive

21

damages since Defendants willfully and fraudulently acted with malice,

22

oppression, and/or in conscious disregard for Plaintiffs and the members of the

23

Classes legal rights as a result of Defendants deceit, as set forth above.

24

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

25

VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA

26

BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE 17200, ET SEQ.

27

(By Plaintiff and the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

28

54.

Plaintiff hereby incorporates the above allegations by reference as if


17
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 20 of 35 Page ID #:20


1
2
3
4

set forth fully herein.


55.

Plaintiff brings this cause of action on behalf of herself and on behalf

the Classes.
56.

The Unfair Competition Law, Business & Professions Code 17200,

et seq. ("UCL"), prohibits any "unlawful," "fraudulent" or "unfair" business act or

practice and any false or misleading advertising.

57.

Defendants conduct as alleged in this Complaint constitutes

unlawful, unfair and/or fraudulent business acts and practices. By engaging in the

acts and practices alleged in this Complaint, Defendants have committed one or

10

more acts of unfair competition within the meaning of California Business &

11

Professions Code 17200, et seq.

12

58.

Plaintiff is a person within the meaning of Business & Professions

13

Code 17204 as defined by Business & Professions Code 17201 and therefore,

14

she has standing to sue for any violation of Business & Professions Code 17200,

15

et seq. on behalf of herself and on behalf of the general public pursuant to

16

Business & Professions Code 17204.

17

59.

Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

18

Defendants, as indicated by their conduct alleged in this Complaint, engaged in

19

unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business practices by selling Private Label Green

20

Coffee Extract Product by misrepresenting the product as containing green

21

coffee extract.

22

60.

In the course of conducting business, Defendants committed

23

unlawful business practices by, inter alia, making the representations (which also

24

constitutes advertising within the meaning of the UCL) and omissions of material

25

facts, as alleged in this Complaint

26

61.

Defendants business practices, as alleged in this Complaint, are

27

"unfair" because they offend established public policy and/or are immoral,

28

unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous and/or substantially injurious to consumers as


18
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 21 of 35 Page ID #:21


1

alleged in this Complaint. Among other things, consumers are led to believe that

the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products contain green coffee bean extract

which is a quality and characteristic that they do not have. Defendants acts and

omissions violate and offend California public policy against engaging in false,

deceptive, and misleading advertising, marketing, labeling, unfair competition and

deceptive conduct towards consumers. Defendants represented that the Private

Label Green Coffee Extract Products are Green Coffee Bean Extract and

contain green coffee bean extract when, in fact, the products contain a sugar

compound similar to Maltose, contains trace amounts (or less) of chlorogenic acid

10

and do not contain green coffee bean extract. The injury to Plaintiff and members

11

of the Classes and consumers greatly outweighs any alleged countervailing benefit

12

to Plaintiff, members of the Classes, consumers or competition under all of the

13

circumstances.

14

62.

Defendants conduct, as alleged in this Complaint, was and is

15

fraudulent, false, misleading and likely to deceive the consuming public within the

16

meaning of California Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq. At all

17

times relevant, as alleged in this Complaint, Defendants' conduct regarding

18

Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products was unlawful, deceptive, untrue,

19

misleading and likely to deceive the public and/or has deceived the Plaintiff and

20

members of the Classes by representing that the product was Green Coffee Bean

21

Extract and contained green coffee bean extract. Defendants knew and failed to

22

disclose that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products contain a sugar

23

compound similar to Maltose, contain only trace amounts (or less) of chlorogenic

24

acid and do not contain green coffee extract. Defendants conduct misleads and

25

deceives consumers.

26

63.

Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products labeled as Green

27

Coffee Bean Extract and as containing green coffee bean extract, violates the

28

following laws, among others:


19
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 22 of 35 Page ID #:22


1

21 CFR 1.21

Cal. Commercial Code 2313;

Cal. Civ. Code 1710;

Cal. Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Civil Code 1750, et seq.);

Cal. Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17200, et seq.);

Cal. False Advertising Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17500, et seq.);

California common law of express and implied warranties;

Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act;

Other laws, including the California Common Law.

10

64.

Plaintiff and the Classes reserve the right to allege other violations of

11

law, which constitute other unlawful business acts or practices. Such conduct is

12

ongoing and continues.

13
14
15
16
17

65.

There were reasonably available alternatives to further Defendants

legitimate business interests, other than the conduct alleged in this Complaint.
66.

Plaintiff and the Classes have, in fact, been deceived as a result of

their reliance on Defendants' conduct as alleged in this Complaint.


67.

As alleged in this Complaint, Plaintiff and the Classes have suffered

18

injury in fact and lost money or property as a result of Defendants conduct.

19

Plaintiff and members of the Classes have been injured because they overpaid for

20

Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products labeled as Green Coffee Bean

21

Extract and as containing green coffee bean extract. Since the value of the

22

product was diminished at the time of sale, Plaintiff and members of the Classes

23

have been injured because had they been made aware that the subject product did

24

not contain green coffee bean extract, they would not have purchased the product,

25

would have paid less for it, or purchased another similar product.

26

68.

Defendants, through their acts of unfair competition, have been able

27

to reap unjust revenue and profit, and have unfairly acquired money from Plaintiff

28

and the Classes. Plaintiff requests that this Court restore this money, with interest,
20
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 23 of 35 Page ID #:23


1

and enjoin Defendant from continuing to violate California Business &

Professions Code 17200, 17203, et seq.

69.

Unless restrained and enjoined, Defendants will continue to engage

in the conduct alleged in this Complaint. Accordingly, injunctive relief is

appropriate.

70.

Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendants to undertake a public

information campaign to inform members of the Classes of its prior acts or

practices.

71.

10

Plaintiff also seeks attorneys fees and costs pursuant to, inter alia,

Civil Code 1021.5.

11

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

12

FALSE AND MISLEADING ADVERTISING IN VIOLATION OF

13

CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE 17500, ET SEQ.

14

(By Plaintiff and the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

15
16
17
18
19

72.

Plaintiff hereby incorporates the above allegations by reference as if

set forth fully herein.


73.

Plaintiff brings this cause of action on behalf of herself and on behalf

of the Classes.
74.

Defendants conduct, misrepresentations, acts and non-disclosures of

20

the material facts alleged in this Complaint constitute false and misleading

21

advertising and therefore constitute a violation of Cal. Business & Professions

22

Code 17500, et seq.

23

75.

At all times relevant, Defendants' advertising and promotion

24

regarding Private Label Green Coffee Extract Product was untrue, misleading and

25

likely to deceive the public and/or has deceived the Plaintiff and consumers by

26

representing that the product contained green coffee bean extract. Defendants

27

knew and failed to disclose that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products

28

contain a sugar compound similar to Maltose, contain only trace amounts (or less)
21
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 24 of 35 Page ID #:24


1
2

of chlorogenic acid and do not contain green coffee extract.


76.

Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products labeled as "Green

Coffee Bean Extract and as containing green coffee bean extract violates the laws

set forth in this Complaint and incorporated herein.

77.

Defendants engaged in the false and/or misleading advertising and

marketing alleged herein with an intent to directly or indirectly induce the

purchase of Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products, labeled as Green

Coffee Bean Extract and/or as containing green coffee bean extract but which

actually contain a sugar compound similar to Maltose, contain trace amounts (or

10
11

less) of chlorogenic acid and do not contain green coffee bean extract.
78.

In making and disseminating the statements and/or omissions alleged

12

herein, Defendants knew or should have known that the statements and/or

13

omissions were untrue or misleading, and acted in violation of California Business

14

& Professions Code 17500, et seq.

15

79.

Plaintiff and the Classes have, in fact, been deceived as a result of

16

their reliance on Defendants' conduct as alleged in this Complaint. Plaintiff and

17

members of the Classes have suffered injury in fact and have lost money or

18

property as a result of Defendants false advertising and unfair competition, as

19

more fully set forth herein. Plaintiff and members of the Classes have been

20

injured Green Coffee Bean Extract and/or as containing green coffee extract, but

21

which actually contain a sugar compound similar to Maltose and do not

22

containing green coffee bean extract, since the value of the product was

23

diminished at the time of sale. Plaintiff and members of the Classes have been

24

injured because had they been made aware that the subject product did not contain

25

green coffee bean extract they would not have purchased the product, would have

26

paid less for it, or purchased another similar product.

27
28

80.

Defendants, through their acts of unfair competition, have been able

to reap unjust revenue and profit, and have unfairly acquired money from Plaintiff
22
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 25 of 35 Page ID #:25


1

and the Classes. Plaintiff requests that this Court restore this money, with interest,

and enjoin Defendant from continuing to violate California Business &

Professions Code 17200, 17203, et seq.

81.

Unless restrained and enjoined, Defendants will continue to engage

in the conduct alleged in this Complaint.

appropriate.

82.

Accordingly, injunctive relief is

Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendants to undertake a public

information campaign to inform members of the Classes of its prior acts or

practices.

10

83.

11

Plaintiff also seeks attorneys fees and costs pursuant to, inter alia,

Civil Code 1021.5.

12

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

13

VIOLATIONS OF CONSUMERS LEGAL REMEDIES ACT,

14

CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 1750, ET SEQ.

15

(By Plaintiff and the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

16
17
18
19

84.

Plaintiff hereby incorporates the above allegations by reference as if

set forth fully herein.


85.

This cause of action is brought pursuant to the California Consumers

Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code 1750, et seq. (the "CLRA").

20

86.

21

Code 1761(d).

22

87.

23
24
25
26

Plaintiff and the Classes are consumers as defined by California Civil


Defendants' Private Label Green Coffee Products are "goods" as

defined by California Civil Code 1761(a).


88.

Defendants conduct as alleged herein constitutes a "transaction"

within the meaning of Civil Code 1761(e).


89.

The CLRA applies to Defendants actions and conduct described

27

herein because it extends to transactions that are intended to result, or which have

28

resulted, in the sale of goods to consumers for personal, family or household use.
23
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 26 of 35 Page ID #:26


1
2

Civil Code 1761(a) and (d).


90.

The CLRA was designed and enacted to protect consumers from

unfair and deceptive business practices. To this end, the CLRA sets forth a list of

unfair and deceptive acts and practices in Civil Code 1770.

91.

The CLRA, as set forth in Civil Code 1760, shall be liberally

construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes, which are to protect

consumers against unfair and deceptive business practices and to provide efficient

and economical procedures to secure such protection.

92.

Defendants have engaged in unfair and deceptive practices to the

10

detriment of Plaintiff and members of the Classes. Plaintiff and members of the

11

Classes have suffered harm as a proximate result of the violations of law and

12

wrongful conduct of Defendants as alleged in this Complaint.

13

93.

Defendants have violated, and continue to violate, the CLRA in at

14

least the following respects:

15

a.

In violation of Civil Code 1770(a)(5), Defendants have

16

represented that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products have

17

characteristics, uses and benefits it does not have;

18

b.

In violation of Civil Code 1770(a)(7), Defendants have

19

represented that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products are of a

20

particular standard, quality or grade when they are not;

21

c.

In violation of Civil Code 1770(a)(9), Defendants have

22

advertised the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products with an intent

23

not to sell them as advertised; and

24

d.

In violation of Civil Code 1770(a)(16), Defendants have

25

represented that the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products have been

26

supplied in accordance with a previous representation when it has not.

27

94.

28

Defendants conduct constitutes intentional misrepresentation, deceit,

and concealment of a material fact known to Defendants with the intention of


24
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 27 of 35 Page ID #:27


1

thereby depriving Plaintiff and members of the Classes of property or otherwise

causing injury.

95.

Unless Defendants are permanently enjoined from continuing to

engage in such violations of the CLRA, other consumers will be damaged by its

acts and practices in the same way as have Plaintiff and members of the Classes.

96.

Plaintiff and members of the Classes further request this Court to

enjoin Defendants from continuing to employ the unlawful methods, acts and

practices alleged above in whatever context it occurs, pursuant to Civil Code

1780(a)(2).

10

97.

Pursuant to Civil Code 1782, Plaintiff gave Defendants notice by

11

letter dated February 11, 2015, by certified mail, of the particular violations of

12

Civil Code 1770. The Notice requested that Defendants rectify the problems

13

associated with the actions alleged in this Complaint, and give notice to all

14

affected consumers of its intent to so act. Defendants have failed to cure these

15

problems within the statutory time period. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks damages

16

for such deceptive practices pursuant to Civil Code 1782 and restitution,

17

pursuant to Civil Code 1780(a)(3).

18
19

98.

Plaintiff and members of the Classes request the Court to award them

their costs and reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to Civil Code 1780(d).

20

SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

21

BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES

22

(By Plaintiff Individually and

23

the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

24
25

99.

Plaintiff hereby incorporates the above allegations by reference as if

set forth fully herein.

26

100. Defendants, in marketing, promoting, advertising, labels, packaging,

27

and other means, made statements and representations of the standards, qualities,

28

nature, ingredients, characteristics, grade, affirmations of fact, and promises to the


25
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 28 of 35 Page ID #:28


1

Public, the Plaintiff, and the Classes, that Private Label Green Coffee Extract

Products are of a certain standard, quality, nature, characteristic, grade, with

certain ingredients, and without certain ingredients, namely, that Private Label

Green Coffee Extract Products did or do contain green coffee bean extract among

other statements and representations.

101. Defendants were and are merchants with respect to the Private Label

Green Coffee Bean Products, which were sold to Plaintiff and members of the

Classes, and there was, in the sale in the stream of commerce to Plaintiff and

members of the Classes, an implied warranty that the subject products were of a

10

certain standard, quality, nature, characteristic, grade, with certain ingredients, and

11

without certain ingredients, specifically, that Private Label Green Coffee Extract

12

Products contain green coffee bean extract among other statements and

13

representations.

14

102. Defendants were and are merchants with respect to the Private Label

15

Green Coffee Products that were sold to Plaintiff and members of the Classes, and

16

there was in the sale in the stream of commerce to Plaintiff and members of the

17

Classes an implied warranty that the subject products were merchantable.

18

103. Defendants breached that implied warranty in that Private Label

19

Green Coffee Extract Products contain green coffee bean extract and are not

20

merchantable as represented, and as alleged in this Complaint.

21
22

104. As a result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff and members of the


Classes did not receive the goods as Defendants impliedly warranted.

23

105. As a proximate result of Defendants breach of implied warranties,

24

Plaintiff and members of the Classes have been damaged in an amount to be

25

determined at trial.

26

///

27

///

28

///
26
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 29 of 35 Page ID #:29


1

EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION

BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS

(By Plaintiff Individually and

the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

5
6

106. Plaintiff hereby incorporates the above allegations by reference as if


set forth fully herein.

107. The Uniform Commercial Code 2-314 provides that "[g]oods to be

merchantable must be at least such as.Conform to the promises or affirmations

of fact made on the container or label if any." Cal.Com.Code 2314(2)(f).

10

108. Defendants,

in

marketing,

promoting,

advertising,

labeling,

11

packaging, and other means, made statements and representations of the

12

standards, qualities, nature, ingredients, characteristics, grade, affirmations of fact,

13

and promises to the Public, the Plaintiff, and the Classes, that the Private Label

14

Green Coffee Extract Products are of a certain standard, quality, nature,

15

characteristic, grade, with certain ingredients, namely, that Private Label Green

16

Coffee Extract Products contained green coffee bean extract among other

17

statements and representations.

18

109. Defendants were and are merchants with respect to the Private Label

19

Green Coffee Extract Products, which were sold to Plaintiff and members of the

20

Classes, and there was in the sale in the stream of commerce to Plaintiff and

21

members of the Classes an implied warranty that the subject products were of a

22

certain standard, quality, nature, characteristic, grade, with certain ingredients, and

23

without certain ingredients, and conformed to the promise on the label that the

24

product contained green coffee extract.

25

110. Defendants breached that implied warranty in that Private Label

26

Green Coffee Extract Products do not conform to the label as they do not contain

27

green coffee bean extract and contain only trace amounts of chlorogenic acid as

28

alleged in this Complaint.


27
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 30 of 35 Page ID #:30


1
2

111. As a result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff and members of the


Classes did not receive the goods as Defendants impliedly warranted.

112. As a proximate result of Defendants breach of the implied warranty

of fitness, Plaintiff and members of the Classes have been damaged in an amount

to be determined at trial.

NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION OF MAGNUSON MOSS

WARRANTY ACT, 15 U.S.C. 2301, ET SEQ.

(By Plaintiff Individually and

10

the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

11
12

113. Plaintiff hereby incorporates the above allegations by reference as if


set forth fully herein.

13

114. The Magnuson Moss Warranty Act (MMWA), 15 U.S.C. 2301,

14

et seq., creates a private federal cause of action for breach of a "written warranty"

15

as defined by the Act. 15 U.S.C. 2301(6) and 2310(d)(1).

16

115. The subject products are "consumer products" as that term is defined

17

by 15 U.S.C. 2301(1), as they constitute tangible personal property which is

18

distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family or

19

household purposes.

20

116. Plaintiff and members of the Classes are "consumers" as defined by

21

15 U.S.C. 2301(3), since they are buyers of subject products for purposes other

22

than resale.

23

117. Defendants are entities engaged in the business of making its food

24

products available, either directly or indirectly, to consumers such as Plaintiff and

25

the Classes. As such, Defendants are a supplier as defined in 15 U.S.C.

26

2301(4).

27

118. Through their labeling, Defendants gave and offered a written

28

warranty to consumers relating to the nature and quality of the ingredients in the
28
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 31 of 35 Page ID #:31


1

subject products, as well as the overall quality of the subject products. As a result,

Defendants are warrantors within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. 2301(5).

119. Defendants provided a written warranty within the meaning of

15 U.S.C. 2301(6) for the subject product by stating affirmations of fact and

written promises prominently on the labels and packaging that the subject

products contained green coffee bean extract for a specific period of time (as

defined by the expiration date imprinted on each bottle) as alleged in this

Complaint. Defendants statements and representations of the standards, qualities,

nature, characteristics, ingredients, grade, affirmations of fact, and promises

10

regarding the Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products constituted, and were

11

intended to convey to purchasers, a written promise that the product contained

12

green coffee bean extract and were of a certain standard (pure). As such,

13

Defendants statements and representations of the standards, qualities, nature,

14

characteristics, ingredients, grade, affirmations of fact, and promises regarding the

15

Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products, were written promises and were part

16

of the basis of Plaintiff's and the Classes' bargain with Defendants in purchasing

17

the subject products.

18

120. Defendants breached the written warranty by failing to provide and

19

supply the subject products for the specified period of time.

20

Defendants failed to provide green coffee bean extract in its products until the

21

expiration date listed on the product. Defendants likewise failed to provide and

22

supply a pure supplement for the time period ending with the expiration date

23

printed by Defendants on each bottle. Since ingredients in the subject products

24

did not have the requisite qualities and character promised by Defendants written

25

warranties for the specified period of time, the subject products did not comply

26

with Defendants obligation under the written warranty to supply pure green

27

coffee bean extract, to Plaintiff and to members of the Classes.

28

Specifically,

121. Plaintiff and the Classes therefore for this claim seek and are entitled
29
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 32 of 35 Page ID #:32


1

to recover damages and other legal and equitable relief and costs and expenses

(including attorneys' fees based upon actual time expended) as provided in

15 U.S.C. 2310(d).

122. Defendants were provided notice and a reasonable opportunity to

cure the defects in the subject products and remedy the harm to Plaintiff and the

Classes, but failed to do so, as alleged in this Complaint.

123. Plaintiff and members of the Classes were injured by Defendants

failure to comply with its obligations under the written warranties, since Plaintiff

and members of the Classes paid for products that did not have the promised

10

ingredients, qualities and nature, paid a premium for the subject products when

11

they could have instead purchased other less expensive alternative products, and

12

lost the opportunity to purchase and consume other products which truly

13

contained green coffee bean extract.

14

TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

15

NEGLIGENCE

16

(By Plaintiff Individually and

17

the Members of the Classes Against All Defendants)

18
19

124. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every prior paragraph of


this Complaint as though set forth in full in this cause of action.

20

125. At all times herein mentioned, Defendants had a duty to exercise

21

reasonable care in the research, development, testing for safety, formulation,

22

manufacture, hiring of and use of qualified scientific or medical personnel,

23

labeling, packaging, promotion, advertising, marketing, distribution, sale, and

24

otherwise releasing into the stream of commerce Private Label Green Coffee Bean

25

Product.

26

126. Defendants, and each of them, breached their duty of reasonable care

27

to Plaintiff and the members of the Classes in that they negligently designed,

28

developed, manufactured, tested, inspected, packaged, promoted, distributed,


30
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 33 of 35 Page ID #:33


1

labeled and/or sold Private Label Green Coffee Bean Product. Specifically,

Defendants failed to exercise reasonable care in ways which included, but were

not limited to, one or more of the following particulars:

a.

In their failure to warn or instruct and/or adequately warn or

adequately instruct the public and consumers, including Plaintiff herein, of

the defective characteristics of Private Label Green Coffee Bean Product;

7
8

b.

contamination or purity of Private Label Green Coffee Bean Product;

9
10

In failing to perform appropriate, reliable and valid testing for

c.

In failing to monitor or require good manufacturing processes

of Private Label Green Coffee Bean Product;

11

d.

In failing to perform appropriate post-market surveillance of

12

Private Label Green Coffee Bean Product.

13

127. Defendants, and each of them, knew or should have known that

14

consumers, such as Plaintiff herein, would foreseeably suffer injury as a result of

15

the Defendants failure to exercise reasonable and ordinary care.

16

128. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants carelessness and

17

negligence, and of the defective characteristics of Private Label Green Coffee

18

Bean Product, Plaintiff and the members of the Classes suffered pecuniary loss.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

PRAYER FOR RELIEF


Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and on behalf of the members of the Classes
defined herein, prays for judgment and relief on all Causes of Action as follows:
1.

An order certifying that the action may be maintained as a class

action as defined herein;


2.

An order awarding Plaintiff and the proposed Class members

damages;
3.

A temporary, preliminary and/or permanent order for injunctive relief

27

requiring Defendants to discontinue advertising, marketing, packaging and

28

otherwise representing Private Label Green Coffee Extract Products as containing


31
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 34 of 35 Page ID #:34


1
2

Green Coffee Extract;


4.

An order requiring imposition of a constructive trust and/or

disgorgement of Defendants ill-gotten gains and to pay restitution to Plaintiff and

all members of the Classes and to restore to the Plaintiff and members of the

Classes all funds acquired by means of any act or practice declared by this Court

to be an unlawful, fraudulent or unfair business act or practice, a violation of laws,

statutes or regulations, or constituting unfair competition;

8
9
10

5.

Distribution of any monies recovered on behalf of members of the

Classes via fluid recovery or cy pres recovery where necessary and as applicable,
to prevent Defendants from retaining the benefits of their wrongful conduct;

11

6.

Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;

12

7.

Reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to, inter alia, Code of Civil

13

Procedure, 1021.5 and Civil Code 1780(d);

14

8.

Costs of this suit; and

15

9.

Such other and further relief as the Court may deem necessary or

16

appropriate.

17
18

DATED: February 11, 2015

19
20
21
22

MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP


HARTMANN & KANANEN
By: /S/ Kiley Lynn Grombacher
Marcus J. Bradley, Esq.
Kiley Lynn Grombacher, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff

23
24
25
26
27
28

32
Complaint
Case No. _____

Case 2:15-cv-01026-TJH-AJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 35 of 35 Page ID #:35


1
2

JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

3
4

DATED: February 11, 2015

5
6
7
8

MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP


HARTMANN & KANANEN
By: /S/ Kiley Lynn Grombacher
Marcus J. Bradley, Esq.
Kiley Lynn Grombacher, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

33
Complaint
Case No. _____

You might also like