Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TECHNICAL PAPER
Deflection
to be considered
Deflection
limitation
ln/180
ln/360
ln/480
ln/240
INTRODUCTION
The object of structural design is to achieve acceptable
probabilities that structures will perform satisfactorily
during their intended service life. For safety, the structure
must have adequate strength with a low probability of
collapse. The required probability against collapse is
achieved by increasing the specified loads by appropriate
load factors and reducing the member strengths by strength
or behavior reduction factors. Although safety is the most
important limit state, it is not sufficient without satisfying the
requirements of serviceability. Service load deflections/
curvatures may be excessive, or long-term deflections/
curvatures due to sustained loads may cause damage to
partitions, visual discomfort, and/or perception. With the
increasing use of higher strength concretes and reinforcing
steels, as well as more efficient design procedures, there is a
tendency toward designing shallower section members in
reinforced concrete structures with attendant reductions in
stiffness and, hence, larger deflections. The recent (2005)
reductions in the ACI load factors have decreased member
sizes, increasing the service load/design ultimate load ratio
and the possibility of deflection serviceability problems.
Most codes offer two methods for control of deflections.
The designer may choose to calculate the deflections and
check that these computed deflections are less than specified
allowable limits. Calculating the immediate deflections of
reinforced concrete members is difficult due to the concrete
cracking in the tension zones due to early-age construction
loads or being under service load. Calculating the additional
deflections due to shrinkage, creep, and the consequent
redistribution of stress is extremely difficult. Alternatively,
the codes give specified maximum span-depth ratios for
which serviceability can be assumed to be satisfied and
deflections do not need to be calculated.
ACI Structural Journal/July-August 2011
RESEARCH SIGNIFICANCE
Codes give specified maximum span/thickness or span/
effective depth ratios for which serviceability can be
assumed to be satisfied and deflections do not need to be
calculated. The use of higher strength reinforcing steel, more
efficient calculation methods, faster construction schedules, and
changes in load factors increase the possibility of deflection
serviceability problems and warrant a review of current
code provisions.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
FOR DEFLECTION CONTROL
ACI 318-08Building Code Requirements for
Reinforced Concrete; CSA A23.3-04Design of
Concrete Structure for Buildings
The American Code, ACI 318-08,1 and the Canadian
Code, CSA A23.3-04,2 are the commonly used design codes
for reinforced concrete structures in North America. For
beams, their provisions are effectively identical to those in
ACI 318-71. The deflection limits are given in Table 1. The
minimum thicknesses of beams and one-way slabs not
supporting, or attached to, partitions likely to be damaged by
large deflections required by both codes are reproduced in
Table 2. No guidance is given for beams and slabs
supporting or attached to partitions likely to be damaged by
deflections. Table 3 is an extended version of Table 2
recommended by ACI Committee 435,3 which distinguishes
between members that support, or are attached to, nonstructural
elements likely to be damaged by large deflections and those
that do not. Grossman4 noted that the minimum member
ACI Structural Journal, V. 108, No. 4, July-August 2011.
MS No. S-2009-389.R1 received May 3, 2010, and reviewed under Institute
publication policies. Copyright 2011, American Concrete Institute. All rights reserved,
including the making of copies unless permission is obtained from the copyright proprietors.
Pertinent discussion including authors closure, if any, will be published in the May-June
2012 ACI Structural Journal if the discussion is received by January 1, 2012.
453
( 0.8 + f y /A )
h min l n --------------------------36 + 9
Noel J. Gardner, FACI, is a member of ACI Committees 209, Creep and Shrinkage of
Concrete; 231, Properties of Concrete at Early Ages; 347, Formwork for Concrete; and
435, Deflection of Concrete Building Structures. His research interests are early-age
member behavior, shrinkage, creep, deflection serviceability, and formwork pressures.
( 0.6 + f y /B )
h min l n --------------------------30 + 4 m
Member
(3)
(1)
(2)
ln /20
ln /24
ln /28
ln/10
Beams or ribbed
one-way slabs
ln/16
ln/18.5
ln /21
ln/8
( 0.6 + f y /B ) 2x d
h min l n --------------------------- -------- ( h d h s )
30
ln
(4)
Note: For fy other than 60,000 psi (414 MPa), the values shall be multiplied by 0.4 +
fy /100,000 psi units (0.4 + fy /690 SI units).
Table 3Minimum thickness of beams and one-way slabs used in roof and floor construction
(ACI Committee 435 1978)
Member
Simply
supported
One end
continuous
Both ends
continuous
Cantilever
Simply
supported
One end
continuous
Both ends
continuous
Cantilever
Roof slab
ln/22
ln/28
ln/35
ln/9
ln/14
ln/18
ln/22
ln/5.5
ln/18
ln/23
ln/28
ln/7
ln/12
ln/15
ln/19
ln/5
ln/14
ln/18
ln/21
ln/5.5
ln/10
ln/13
ln/16
ln/4
Table 4Minimum thickness of slabs without interior beams unless deflections are computed
(ACI 318-08)
Without drop panels
Exterior panels
Exterior panels
Interior panels
fy, MPa
fy, psi
280
40,000
ln/33
ln/36
ln/36
ln/36
ln/40
ln/40
420
60,000
ln/30
ln/33
ln/33
ln/33
ln/36
ln/36
520
75,000
ln/28
ln/31
ln/31
ln/31
ln/34
ln/34
*Slabs
454
with beams along exterior edges. The value of f for the edge beam shall not be less than 0.8.
Rectangular sections
Flanged beams
bw /b < 0.3
Cantilever
5.6
Simply supported
20
16.0
Continuous
26
20.8
0
1
l
--- K 11 + 1.5 f ck /A ------------- + ------ f ck /A ----0
d
12
if < 0
(5a)
if > 0
(5b)
Steel service
stress
MPa
ksi
100
14.5
150
21.8
200
29.0
250
36.3
300
41.8
307
44.5
1.0
14
20
18
26
1.5
20
30
1.2
17
24
Cantilever
0.4
1/3
(6)
1/3
(7)
Gardner and
Using a layered, nonlinear finite element program,
Gardner and Zhang10 determined the span thickness
requirements to satisfy a specified deflection limit in
terms of specified, or characteristic, concrete strength;
tension and compression steel ratios; and the ratio of the
sustained moment to the moment capacity of the beam. A
hybrid method was used to calculate the long-term behavior
using a reduced modulus to account for creep; a conventional
time-dependent load vector was used for shrinkage. The
positive reinforcement was reduced at the theoretical 50%
cutoff point. Characteristic concrete strengths of 20, 30,
and 40 MPa (2900, 4400, and 5800 psi) were considered. To
take advantage of the mean concrete strengths being larger
than the characteristic concrete strengths, the mean concrete
456
Factor
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
0.35
1/3
(8)
all
-------l
(9)
k 1 k 2 l n 38
- ------ ---------h --------53.4 t 0.2
f cm28
o
(10)
where k() = (1.20 0.20) > 0.9 and is the ratio of longer
clear span to shorter clear span.
Thompson and Scanlon5 also recommended that the
minimum slab thickness could be reduced by 10% for flat
slabs with drop panels whose thickness is greater than or
equal to 1.25 times the slab thickness, or by 20% if the
drop panel thickness is greater than 1.50 times the slab
thickness. Thompson and Scanlon5 did not investigate the
effect of age at which the construction load was applied
on the calculated deflections.
Ofosu-Asamoah and Gardner14flat slabs
The deflection serviceability of flat slabs is determined by
the loads imposed during the construction process (method
and rate of construction), taking account of the concrete
strength available when the construction loads are imposed,
and the expected sustained service load. The shore-reshore
procedure used to construct many reinforced concrete flat slab
ACI Structural Journal/July-August 2011
1.4
+ 1.7L/D------------------------------2.25
0.25
( 1.15 0.15 )
(11)
ln
h min ----- k()
30
0.6
k 1 k 2 l n 5500
- ------ -----------h --------f cm28
96.7 t 0.2
o
0.6
1.4 + 1.7L/D
-------------------------------2.25
0.25
( 1.15 0.15 )
(A11)
M = 50% Mu
M = 70% Mu
, %
, %
fck = 30 MPa
(4400 psi)
20 MPa
(2900 psi)
30 MPa
(4400 psi)
40 MPa
(5800 psi)
20 MPa
(2900 psi)
30 MPa
(4400 psi)
40 MPa
(5800 psi)
< 0.5
12.7
8.2
9.8
10.9
7.9
9.8
10.3
1.0
11.1
8.4
9.9
10.8
6.8
8.5
9.9
1.5
10.8
7.7
8.8
10.1
6.4
8.1
9.2
2.0
9.7
7.1
8.3
9.3
5.9
7.4
8.3
*For
1.5
0.5
13.9
11.0
11.6
12.7
8.8
10.7
11.5
2.0
0.5
12.6
9.9
10.8
11.6
8.0
9.7
10.3
2.5
0.5
11.8
9.2
10.2
10.8
7.7
8.7
9.5
2.0
1.0
15.0
12.6
13.3
14.2
10.2
11.9
12.7
2.5
1.0
14.2
11.5
12.4
12.6
9.9
10.8
11.3
3.0
1.0
13.7
11.0
11.4
12.3
9.2
10.1
10.6
2.5
1.5
16.6
14.0
15.0
14.6
12.3
13.2
13.5
3.0
1.5
14.7
13.3
13.7
14.0
11.2
12.2
13.0
, %
ACI
318-08*
CSA
A23.3
BS
Eurocode Gardner
8110-97
2||
and Zhang#
< 0.5
16
16
21.2
17
19.6
16
16
16.9
13.2
19.8
1.5
16
16
14.8
11.9
17.6
16
16
13.5
11.3
16.6
1.5
0.5
16
16
16.9
13.5
23.2
2.5
0.5
16
16
14.3
11.6
20.4
2.5
16
16
15.6
12.4
24.8
*Steel
ACI-CSA
BS 8110
AS 3600
Eurocode
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.4
0.5
0.35
0.4
0.4
0.35
2
n
wl
-------11
wl
--------n
14
wl
--------n
16
Cantilever
wl
--------n
2
Table 12Comparison flat slab interior panel span/thickness ratios without drop panels
Span, m
Span, ft
ACI 318-08
CSA A23.3-04
BS 8110-97
AS 3600-09
Eurocode*
20
33
30
34
26.7
37
36.0
31.3
7.00
23
33
30
34
25.6
37
33.9
28.9
8.50
28
33
30
34||
24.4||
37||
31.5
26.8
20
33
lb/ft2
(4.8 kPa)
30
33.8
25.3
37
33.8
28.9
24.4
37
31.9
27.3
23.7||
37||
29.7
25.4
+10%
+10%
7.00
23
33
30
33.5
8.50
28
33
30
33.1||
+10%
+20%
sequence. The provisions of AS 3600-099 and OfusoAsamoah and Gardner14 (3-day construction cycle) are more
conservative than the other proposals.
All the provisions except ACI 318 and CSA A23.3 require
iteration to determine the limiting deem-to-satisfy spandepth ratio either by calculating/assuming steel ratio or the
member self-weights. Tables 8, 9, 10, and 12, however, can
be used as design aids.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The live loads for which deflections should be calculated
should be clearly specified in the codes, taking note of the
difference between expected live load and extreme or
characteristic live load. For purposes of calculating the
incremental deflections, it is suggested that the service load
be calculated from the equation that follows, which is a
compromise between the provisions of BS 8110-97 and
AS 3600-2009.
service load = D + L
where = 0.4 for offices, apartments, etc.; and 0.8 for storage.
ACI Structural Journal/July-August 2011
460