Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
1. Introduction 3
2. Employee Empowerment and Participative work redesign 4
3. Workplace Challenges 7
2
INTRODUCTION
Helping people grow and achieve their dreams is the fastest route to
success; both theirs and yours."
- T. Harv Eker
Growth was never an individual prerogative and never will be. The
limits of human capabilities still remain undiscovered. How much a person
can develop and realize his or her potential is a function of the
circumstances that govern his or her freedom and history stands testimony
to the fact that human potential generally suffers under degrading and
imperial conditions. The above statement by motivational speaker T. Harv
Eker indicates the importance of helping people discover and develop their
innate potential, which is the safest and surest way to achieving overall
growth which especially stands to be true in context of the age-old
organisational relationship between subordinate and superior.
This essay intends to support the worker centrality of the remit and
need to embody empowerment theories in organisational programmes for
development via participation, consultation and cooperation. Then, the
various impediments facing workplace and organisational restructuring will
be discussed in terms of extent and scope. The last part includes directives
that can be implemented into organisational strategy to effect change that
makes workforce empowerment as effective as possible.
3
EMPLOYEE EMPOWERMENT AND PARTICIPATIVE WORK REDESIGN
A historic account and the need for empowerment
4
In 1908, Ford’s assembly line concept in his car making business,
that shot him to fame applied needs theory practically, when financial
incentives like ‘five dollar a day’ and ‘Americanisation program’ were
introduced in order to affect workers’ Psychological and Esteem needs
based on Maslow’s theory. The reason for Ford and his company’s
resounding success in the 1900’s was the economic condition that was
presented to his methods. The labour was malleable and in need of
financial help. The ‘low skill’ requirement agenda and better pays formed
the basis of employee attraction. His deskilling methods via job division
brought price of cars to widely affordable levels and hence his company
survived competition. However, adverse labour conditions in his factories
overtime caused increasing absenteeism, mental and physical health
concerns and counter productivity due to rigid labour behaviour in times of
buoyant markets3. In addition, his labour management methods were highly
criticised as being dehumanising and opportunistically imperial by critics of
Taylorism like Harry Braverman and Anthony Gramsci,
Ford could be easily accused to follow Taylor’s ideas in his car
manufacturing organisation for labour management. The main ideas of
labour division, work segmentation, surveillance and financial incentives for
motivation11 used by Ford could be directly correlated with Taylorism.
Although appreciated for the profits they bore, overtime, incompetence and
non-humanistic facets emerged because of two reasons; first being the
effect of changing markets on the way management dealt with their
employees and effect of this on an informed customers’ perspective. The
second reason was increasing awareness of the workforce about their
rights and demand for humane and worker centred management practices.
5
The outcome of these ideas was a more responsive system of
management that, as a turnaround from Taylorism and Fordism, offered
autonomy of working groups and freedom of thought. It was intended to
promote “meaningful, enriching and productive experience”3 to the workers.
More specifically; Managers were asked to assign their workers with more
meaningful work so that they have a sense of achievement. The workers
were allowed to move between jobs and to work in groups to develop
responsive and critical thinking. Job contents were revised from a worker
point of view because it was the worker who knew the job and details of its
performance. But these “suffered serious setbacks in times of recession
and corporate instability, confronting frequent backpedalling and fluctuating
patterns of managerial responsiveness”3. This indicated the need for
progressive management idea that enjoins pragmatic change patterns
which obviate the effects of the aforementioned factors of prior failures.
Empowerment is being proposed as one such progressive management
idea.
Illustrating the effects of offering autonomy of decisions and freedom
to act as a part of the psychological contract from the Loeb centre for
Nursing and Rehabilitation located in New York, Susan Bower-Ferres,
assistant director of the Loeb Centre describes it as one that offers the
registered nurse to develop her role in a system facilitated unencumbered
environment. Organisationally facilitated environment for participative
working was able to affect “nurse accountability and coordination between
physicians, other departments and outside agencies.”5 The result was a
statistically proven improvement record of active service the centre had
rendered in a four year span. This proves the reliability of empowerment in
a dynamic setting of a nursing centre where service demands are often
unpredictable and sudden.
6
WORKPLACE CHALLENGES
7
specifics of empowerment entail as identified by Jay Conger and Rabindra
Kanugo:
“Despite the recognized role of empowerment in management theory
and practice, our understanding of the construct is limited and often
confusing. For example, most management theorists have dealt with
empowerment as a set of managerial techniques and have not paid
sufficient attention to its nature or the processes underlying the
construct. This may reflect the pragmatic or practice orientation of
theorists, and the result may be an inadequate understanding of the
notion of empowerment and its theoretical rationale for related
practices.”
Conger and Kanugo6
This takes the discussion further to those existing contradictions and
misconceptions clouding empowerment concept.
8
lacks analytical commitment6 that was seen in Taylor’s work with Scientific
Management. It is not wrong, with this piece of evidence, to say that most
of the empowerment jargon that exists out there covers its idea only in
words and labels using glossy language and does little towards its analysis
in practical contexts.
• To what extent does job enrichment and enlargement affect the top
and middle management’s job description?
• How can the bequest of power down the hierarchy be promoted or
does it really require acquisition of power for those being
empowered?
• Can empowerment not entail loss of responsibility by some (usually
middle managers)?
• What is the scope of its implications? Is it the origin of autonomy or
simply an offer of increased say in management or just a choice
among the options laid out by management?
Most issues like these aren’t attended to as“ the burgeoning prescriptive or
celebratory literature on empowerment is replete with equivocation,
tautology and contradiction in equal measure about what ‘empowerment’ is,
for whom, to what extent, where and why empowerment should occur and
what else accompanies it.”8. The contrast between the portrayal of
empowerment as a new-age philosophy and the ambiguous nature of its
concepts, usually prescriptive, casts doubt on the much celebrated strength
of this philosophy to cause positive change.4 Thus, following Chris Argyris,
empowerment is after all “emperors’ new clothes.”1
9
necessary for realising new ways of managing organisations. From what
we know, there has always been a hierarchy, a method of doing things on
the job, a code of conduct, idea of where information or knowledge must or
should come from and who hold it, so on and so forth. These attitudinal
hurdles prevent absolute realisation of empowerment. Grassroots of
fundamentals cannot be affected unless this flawed conceptualisation of
organisations is corrected or adjusted to create space for worker centrality
to survive and develop within the system, promoting the system’s growth
too.
10
The employees on the other hand, the stars of the show called
empowerment or at least who are made to feel like one, are, as Chris
Argyris observed ambivalent. This is a natural result of unspoken
scepticism because of the much abused command-and control model that
binds employees to ‘them and us’ mentality. From employees’ view point,
this behaviour is quite logical because the main ideology of empowerment
is provision of power and an employee who had gotten used to being
controlled by his superiors in the first place, feels the rabbit hole getting
deeper when he is offered power and the accountability for it at the same
time. It is therefore, obvious to expect scepticism and mixed responses. In
all of this, the main premise of empowerment again suffers.
These are the very general issues that empowerment faces in its
implementation as an accepted management concept. As we delve deeper,
it is inevitable to realise presence of specific impediments both while
understanding and applying the concept and its general interpretations.
The solution lies in committed resolve and a set of underpinning guidelines
that provide direction to achieve attitudinal, organisational and motivational
conformation that sets the pace of empowerment as a philosophy of
beneficial change.
Recognition
12
and/or sceptical view of managerial actions. Following Conger and
Kanugo, managers should take the initiative and recognise:
Corrective measures
13
staying clear of capitalist ideologies of growth should encompass intentions
that help establish an environment that is replete with mutual trust and
encouragement of individual growth.
14
• Improving awareness and removal of
✔ Factors that seem to enhance bureaucratic climate
✔ Systems that overtly impress employee dependence on
superiors
✔ Structures that limit discretion, freedom and fearlessness
✔ Job designs that fail to motivate
• Appraisal of
✔ Restructured tasks especially promoters of worker discretion
✔ Measures that enhance worker motivation
✔ Employee attitudes to identify those which are retrograde
✔ Deviations that recede intended outcomes
SUMMARY
ANNEXURE 1:
Extracted from F. Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene theory
16
17
REFERENCES:
18