Chapter 1. 1D Plasticity Models v1.0

Computational Solid Mechanics
Computational Plasticity
Chapter 1. 1D Plasticity Models

C. Agelet de Saracibar
ETS Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politcnica de Catalua (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Barcelona, Spain
1D Plasticity Models > Contents
Contents
Contents
1. 1D Rate independent plasticity models
1.
2.
3.
Motivation
Perfect plasticity model
Hardening plasticity model
2. 1D Rate dependent plasticity models

1.
2.
3.
April 1, 2015
Motivation
Carlos Agelet de Saracibar
Contents
Contents
1.
2.
3.
Motivation

1.
2.
3.
April 1, 2015
Motivation
1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models
Motivation
Physical and rheological models: Linear elastic spring
April 1, 2015
Motivation
Physical model: Rigid block sliding on a rough surface.
Coulombs frictional law
April 1, 2015
F < N
0
=
F = N
F > N
no equilibrium
Motivation
Rheological model: Coulombs frictional device
0
< e =
= e 0
> e not admissible
April 1, 2015
Motivation
Rheological model: Elastic spring + frictional device
< e f =0, e = , =E e , =E e =E ( f )
=
e e =0, f = , =0, =E e =E ( f )
> e not admissible
April 1, 2015
Motivation
Rheological model: Elastic spring + frictional device
April 1, 2015

Hypothesis
Within the framework of the infinitesimal deformation theory,
we introduce the following hypothesis for a 1D rate-independent
linear elastic-perfect plastic model, within the incremental
theory of plasticity:
H1. Additive split of the infinitesimal strain
= e + p
H2. Set of plastic internal variables: plastic strain
E p := { p }
April 1, 2015

H3. Free energy per unit of volume: quadratic elastic potential
1
e 2
=
( ) : W=
( ) 2 E ( )
e
H4. Clausius-Planck inequality. Linear elastic constitutive

equation, and reduced plastic dissipation inequality
D := ( e ) 0
e
D=: =
e
0
( )
e
=
=
E e , D :=
p 0
e
April 1, 2015
10

H5. Space of admissible stresses, elastic domain, and yield
surface. Yield function.
{
int ( ) := {
:= {
}
< 0}
= 0}
:= f ( ) = Y 0
April 1, 2015
f ( ) = Y
f ( ) = Y
11

H6. Associative plastic flow rule
p =
> 0 if =
Y > 0
p
= < 0 if = Y < 0
p = f ( ) = sgn ( ) if > 0,
f ( ) = Y =0
H7. Kuhn-Tucker loading/unloading conditions
if > 0 then
if
f ( ) < 0 then =
0 Elastic loading/unloading
0,
April 1, 2015
f ( ) =
0 Plastic loading
f ( ) 0, f ( ) =
0
12

H8. Plastic consistency condition
if
if
f ( ) =
0 and > 0 then f ( ) =
0 Plastic loading
0 Elastic unloading
f (=) 0 and f ( ) < 0 then =
f ( )= 0 then 0,
if
f ( ) 0, f ( )= 0
Plastic loading: plastic consistency (or persistency) condition
=
f ( ) 0 and > 0 =
f ( ) 0
f =
f =
sgn ( ) E sgn ( ) E p =
sgn ( ) E E =
0
=
E 1 sgn ( ) E > 0
April 1, 2015
13

Trial stress rate
trial
=
: E , =
: trial E p
Plastic loading: plastic multiplier (or plastic consistency)

parameter
f = f = f trial f E p = f trial E = 0
=
E 1 f trial =
E 1 sgn ( ) trial > 0
=
E 1 f trial =
E 1 sgn ( ) trial 0
April 1, 2015
14

Plastic loading/elastic unloading from the yield surface
Case 1
if
if
f trial < 0 then =

0 Elastic unloading
f trial < 0 then

if > 0 then f =
f trial E < 0, f < 0 =
0
Case 2
if
if
f trial > 0 then > 0 Plastic loading
f trial > 0 then

if =
0 then f =
f trial E > 0 > 0,
April 1, 2015
f =
0
15

Geometric interpretation
trial
f ( )
trial
trial
Y
Elastic unloading
trial
Y
Elastic unloading
Plastic loading
April 1, 2015
f ( )
Plastic loading
16

Stress-strain curve for a rate-independent elastoplastic model
with linear elastic and perfect plastic response
April 1, 2015
17

Stress-strain curve: hardening plasticity
April 1, 2015
18

Stress-strain curve: Bauschinger effect (kinematic hardening)
April 1, 2015
19

Stress-strain curve: isotropic/kinematic hardening
April 1, 2015
20

Hypothesis
we introduce the following hypothesis for a 1D rate-independent
elastoplastic model with linear elastic response, and linear
isotropic and kinematic hardening, within the incremental
= e + p
H2. Set of plastic internal variables
E p := { p , , }
April 1, 2015
21

H3. Free energy per unit of volume: quadratic elastic, isotropic
hardening and kinematic hardening potentials
( e , =
, ) : W ( e ) + ( ) + ( )
1
e 2
W ( ) = E ( ) Elastic potential
2
1
( ) =
K 2 Isotropic hardening potential
2
1
( ) =
H 2 Kinematic hardening potential
2
e
E + K + H > 0, E + K > 0, E + H > 0

April 1, 2015
22

equation, linear hardening equations and reduced plastic
dissipation
D := ( e , , ) 0
D=: e
e
0
p
( )
= = E e , q := = K , q := = H
D =: p + q + q 0
e
April 1, 2015
23

Linear isotropic hardening
q := = K
Nonlinear isotropic hardening
(1) Exponential saturation law + linear isotropic hardening
q := := ( Y ) (1 exp ( ) ) K
(2) Power law
q := := Y k1 ( k2 + )
April 1, 2015
24

{
int ( ) := { , q, q
:= { , q, q
}
+ q < 0}
+ q = 0}
:= , q, q f ( , q, q ) = q Y + q 0
( Y q q )
April 1, 2015
f ( , q , q ) = q Y
f ( , q , q ) = q Y
Y q + q
25

if
> 0,
f ( , q, q ) = q Y + q = 0 then
p =
f ( , q , q ) =
sgn ( q )
=
f ( , q , q ) =
=
q f ( , q , q ) =
sgn ( q )
April 1, 2015
26

if > 0 then
if
f ( , q, q ) < 0 then =
0 Elastic loading/unloading
0,
April 1, 2015
f ( , q , q ) =
0 Plastic loading
f ( , q, q ) 0, f ( , q, q ) =
0
27

H8. Plastic consistency condition
if
f ( , q , q ) =
0 and > 0 then f ( , q, q ) =
0 Plastic loading
f (=
, q, q ) 0 and f ( , q, q ) < 0 the
n 0 Elastic unloading
=
if
f ( , q , q ) =
0 then 0,
if
f ( , q, q ) 0, f ( , q, q ) =
0
f (=
, q, q ) 0 and > 0
April 1, 2015
f (=
, q, q ) 0
28

f = f + q f q + q f q
= sgn ( q ) + q sgn ( q ) q
= sgn ( q ) E sgn ( q ) E p K + sgn ( q ) H
=sgn ( q ) E sgn 2 ( q ) E K sgn 2 ( q ) H
H) 0
= sgn ( q ) E ( E+K +=
April 1, 2015
( E+K +H )
sgn ( q ) E > 0
29

Trial stress rate
trial
=
: E , =
: trial E p
Plastic loading: plastic multiplier parameter
f = f + q f q + q f q
trial
p
= f f E q f K q f H
= f trial ( E+K +H ) =0
( E+K +H ) f trial =
1
( E+K +H )
April 1, 2015
f trial =
( E+K +H ) sgn ( q ) trial > 0

1
( E+K +H )
sgn ( q ) trial 0
30

Case 1
0 Elastic unloading
f trial < 0 then =
if
f trial < 0 and
if
> 0 then
f = f trial ( E+K +H ) < 0, f < 0 =0

Case 2
f trial > 0 then > 0 Plastic loading
if
f trial > 0 and
if
=
0 then
f = f trial ( E+K +H ) > 0 > 0,

April 1, 2015
f =0
31

trial f ( , q, q ) trial
trial
( Y q q )
Elastic unloading
trial
Y q + q
Elastic unloading
Plastic loading
April 1, 2015
f ( , q , q )
Plastic loading
32

Isotropic hardening
Geometric interpretation: expansion (without translation) of the
yield surface
( Y q )
April 1, 2015
Y q
33

Kinematic hardening
Geometric interpretation: translation (without expansion) of the
yield surface
( Y q )
April 1, 2015
Y + q
34

Isotropic + Kinematic hardening
Geometric interpretation: expansion and translation of the yield
surface
( Y q q )
April 1, 2015
Y
Y q + q
35

with linear elastic and linear isotropic hardening plasticity
April 1, 2015
36

with linear elastic and linear kinematic hardening plasticity
April 1, 2015
37

with linear elastic, linear isotropic/linear kinematic hardening
plasticity
April 1, 2015
38

Reduced plastic dissipation
Plastic dissipation rate per unit of volume
D := p + q + q
= ( sgn ( q ) + q q sgn ( q ) )
= ( ( q ) sgn ( q ) + q )
= ( q + q)
= ( f ( , q , q ) + Y )
= Y 0
April 1, 2015
39

Maximum plastic dissipation principle
Given a strain rate and a rate of the plastic internal variables
:
=
E
p : p , ,
, 0, 0} , E
{=
{ }
the maximum plastic dissipation principle states that the stress

state satisfies
p
p
D S, E D T , E
where,
=
S:
, q, q } , T : { , p, p}
{=
p : SE
p, D T , E
p : TE
p
=
D S, E
=
April 1, 2015
40

Maximum plastic dissipation
)
) :=
p D T ,E
p
D S, E
p
D S T ,E
T
E
(
) 0 T
Constrained minimization problem
(
) T
)) T
arg min ( D (T , E
S arg max D T , E
=
S
April 1, 2015
41

Maximum plastic dissipation, given by,
( (
p
=
S arg min D T , E
))
is equivalent to associative plastic flow rule, Kuhn-Tucker

loading/unloading conditions, and convexity of the yield surface,
given by,
p= f (S )
E
S
0,
(T
April 1, 2015
f (S) 0, f (S) =
0
S ) S f (S ) f (T ) f (S ) T
42

Proof 1. Maximum plastic dissipation implies associative plastic
flow rule and Kuhn-Tucker loading/unloading conditions
Constrained minimization problem
( (
p
=
S arg min D T , E
))
Unconstrained minimization problem: Lagrange multipliers
p
p
,
,
:
,
T
E
D
T
E
(
)
(
) + f (T
S arg min L
April 1, 2015
T
,
E
, ) T
(
43

The optimality conditions of the unconstrained minimization
problem yield
TL
p ,
T, E
p
= T D T, E
=
T S=
T S
+ T f ( T ) T =S
p + f (S) =0
= E
S
p= f (S )
E
S
0,
April 1, 2015
f (S) 0, f (S) =
0
44

Proof 2. Maximum plastic dissipation implies convexity of the
yield surface
Unconstrained minimization problem
(
)
) + f (S ) D (T , E
) + f (T )
D (S, E
) D (S, E
) ( f (T ) f (S ) )
D (T , E
p , L
S, E
T
,
E
, ) T
(
T
T
(T S ) S f (S ) ( f (T ) f (S ) ) T
if
> 0 then
April 1, 2015
(T
S ) S f (S ) f (T ) f (S ) T
45

Proof 3. Associative plastic flow rule, Kuhn-Tucker loading/
unloading conditions and convexity of the yield surface implies
maximum plastic dissipation
Using associative plastic flow rule
p = f (S )
E
S
S
E
T
(
) = ( T S ) S f ( S ) T
Using convexity of the yield surface

p
T
S
E
(
) ( f (T ) f (S) ) T
April 1, 2015
46

Maximum plastic dissipation: elastic unloading (trivial case)
0 then
if=
T
S
E
(
) 0 and
p D T ,E
p
D S, E
Maximum plastic dissipation: plastic loading
> 0 then
if
f (S ) =
0 and
T
S
E
(
) f (T ) 0 T
p D T ,E
p
D S, E
April 1, 2015
47

Hypothesis
H3. Free energy per unit of volume
equation, linear hardening equations and reduced dissipation
April 1, 2015
48

Hypothesis
H3. Free energy per unit of volume
equation, linear hardening equations and reduced dissipation
H6. Maximum plastic dissipation
April 1, 2015
49
Contents
Contents
1.
2.
3.
Motivation

1.
2.
3.
April 1, 2015
Motivation
50
1D Plasticity Models > Rate Dependent Plasticity Models
Motivation
Rheological model: dashpot
April 1, 2015
51
Motivation
Rheological model: elastic spring + frictional device |
dashpot
No se puede mostrar la imagen en este momento.
e
p
= e + p
ex :=
Y sgn ( ) =
f ( ) sgn ( )
=
p
April 1, 2015
=
ex
f ( ) sgn =
( )
f ( ) f ( )
52

Hypothesis
we introduce the following hypothesis for a1D rate-dependent
linear elastic-perfect plastic model, within the incremental
= e + p
H2. Set of plastic internal variables: plastic strain
E p := { p }
April 1, 2015
53

H3. Free energy per unit of volume: quadratic elastic potential
1
e 2
=
( ) : W=
( ) 2 E ( )
e

equation, and reduced plastic dissipation inequality
D := ( e ) 0
e
D=: =
e
0
( )
e
=
=
E e , D :=
p 0
e
April 1, 2015
54

H5. Elastic domain, plastic domain, and yield surface. Yield
function.
{
ext ( ) := {
:= {
}
> 0}
= 0}
:= f ( ) = Y 0
April 1, 2015
f ( ) = Y
f ( ) = Y
55

=
p
f ( ) f ( =
)
f ( ) sgn ( )
The associative plastic flow rule can be cast as
1
=
f ( ) =
sgn ( ) , =f ( ) 0
p
1
1
1
= f ( ) f ( ) = Y sgn ( ) = ( Y sgn ( ) )
p
April 1, 2015
56

Closest-point-projection (cpp)
Y sgn ( ) if ext
* P=
=

if

Natural relaxation time
:= E 1
Associative plastic flow rule
April 1, 2015
E 1 ( *)
57

Associative plastic flow rule: geometric interpretation
p
=
E 1 ( *)
* = PE ( )
* = PE ( )
April 1, 2015
58

Stress-strain curve for a rate-dependent linear elastic, perfect
plastic model
April 1, 2015
59

Perzyna model
The associative plastic flow rule given by
=
p
f ( ) f ( =
)
f ( ) sgn ( )
is equivalent to the maximization of a regularized plastic

dissipation, and can be obtained as the solution of the following
unconstrained minimization problem
arg min D ( , p )
=
1
D=
( , ) : D ( , ) 2 f ( )
p
April 1, 2015
60

Perzyna model
Proof. The solution of the unconstrained minimization problem
reads,
=
arg min D ( , p )
2
1
D=
( , ) : D ( , ) 2 f ( )
1
p
p
D ( , ) :=
D ( , )
f ( ) f ( ) =
0
p
:=
p
April 1, 2015
f ( ) f ( ) = 0
61

Duvaut-Lions model
The associative plastic flow rule given by
=
p
E 1 ( *)
is equivalent to the maximization of a regularized plastic

dissipation, and can be obtained as the solution of the following
unconstrained minimization problem written in terms of the cpp
arg min D ( , p )
=
1
D ( , =
) : D ( , ) 2 *
p
April 1, 2015
2
E 1
62

Closest-point-projection (cpp)
The closest-point-projection is obtained as the solution of the
following constrained minimization probem, written in terms of
the complementary energy
=
* arg min ( * ) *
( * ) =
1
2
2
E 1
1
2
( * ) E ( * )
1
Using the Lagrange multipliers method it can be transformed

into the following unconstrained minimization problem
( ,* ; * ) *
L ( , * ; * ) :=
( * ) + * f (* )
* arg min L
April 1, 2015
63

Proof 1. The solution of the unconstrained minimization problem
reads,
=
arg min D ( , p )
D ( , =
) : D ( ,
p
D ( , p
) *
0
D ( , ) E ( * ) =
) :=
p
1
2
E 1
:= p 1 E 1 ( * ) = 0
=
April 1, 2015
E 1 ( * )
64

Proof 2. The solution of the closest-point-projection, obtained as
the solution of an unconstrained minimization probem written in
terms of the complementary energy, reads,
* arg min L
( ,* ; * )
( * ) + * f (* )
( , * ; * ) :=
* L ( , * ; * ) :=* ( * ) + * * f (* ) =0
:= E 1 ( * ) + * * f (* ) =
0
* 0, f ( * ) 0, * f ( * ) =
0
April 1, 2015
65

The solution of the unconstrained minimization problem yields
the following results for the closest-point-projection,
0
E 1 ( * ) + * * f (* ) =
* + E* * f (* ) =
* sgn * + E * sgn * =
sgn
( *
sgn
+ E * ) sgn * =
sgn
* =
E * , sgn * =
April 1, 2015
66

For the non-trivial case (plastic loading), using the Kuhn-Tucker
complementarity conditions for the cpp, the Lagrange multiplier
reads,
if
* > 0 then
f (* ) = * Y = 0
f (* ) = E* Y = f ( ) E* = 0
=
* E 1 f ( ) > 0
and the closest-point-projection takes the form,
* =
f ( ) =
Y , sgn * =
sgn
* =
=
* sgn * Y sgn
April 1, 2015
67

Hypothesis
we introduce the following hypothesis for a 1D rate-dependent
linear elastic-hardening plasticity model, within the incremental
= e + p
E p := { p , , }
April 1, 2015
68

H3. Free energy per unit of volume: quadratic elastic, isotropic
hardening and kinematic hardening potentials
( e , =
, ) : W ( e ) + ( ) + ( )
1
e 2
W ( ) = E ( ) Elastic potential
2
1
( ) =
K 2 Isotropic hardening potential
2
1
( ) =
H 2 Kinematic hardening potential
2
e
E > 0, E + K + H > 0, E + K > 0, E + H > 0

April 1, 2015
69

equation, linear isotropic/linear kinematic hardening, and
reduced plastic dissipation inequality
D := ( e , , ) 0
D=: e
e
e + e 0
= = E e , q := = K , q := = H
D =: p + q + q 0
e
April 1, 2015
70

H5. Elastic domain, plastic domain, and yield surface. Yield
function
{
ext ( ) := { , q, q
:= { , q, q
}
+ q > 0}
+ q = 0}
:= , q, q f ( , q, q ) = q Y + q 0
( Y q q )
April 1, 2015
f ( , q , q ) = q Y
f ( , q , q ) = q Y
Y q + q
71

p =
f ( , q , q ) =
sgn ( q )
=
f ( , q , q ) =
=
q f ( , q , q ) =
sgn ( q )
H7. Plastic multiplier
April 1, 2015
f ( , q , q ) 0
72

Reduced plastic dissipation
Plastic dissipation rate per unit of volume
D := p + q + q
= ( sgn ( q ) + q q sgn ( q ) )
= ( ( q ) sgn ( q ) + q )
= ( q + q)
= ( f ( , q , q ) + Y )
= ( + Y ) 0
April 1, 2015
73

Perzyna model
The plastic flow rule can be obtained as the solution of an
unconstrained minimization problem, arising from the
maximization of a regularized plastic dissipation, given by,
p
S=
arg min D T , E
))
1
p
p
D=
S, E : D S, E
f (S )
2
April 1, 2015
74

The solution of the unconstrained minimization problem, arising
from the maximization of a regularized plastic dissipation, yields
the following plastic flow rule,
p
S=
arg min D T , E
))
2
1
p
p
SD S, E :=
SD S, E
f (S )
2
1
p
:=
f (S ) S f (S ) =
0
E
1
p
=
E
f (S ) S f (S )
April 1, 2015
75

Duvaut-Lions model
The plastic flow rule can be obtained as the solution of an
unconstrained minimization problem, arising from the
maximization of a regularized plastic dissipation, given by,
p
S=
arg min D T , E
))
1
p
p
, E : D S, E (S S*)
=
D S
1
2
p
=: D S, E
S S* C 1
2
April 1, 2015
76

The solution of the unconstrained minimization problem, arising
from the maximization of a regularized plastic dissipation, yields
the following associative plastic flow rule,
p
S=
arg min D T , E
))
1 1
p
p
SD S, E :=
SD S, E C (S S*)
1 1
p
:=E C (S S*) =0
1 1
p
=
E
C (S S*)
April 1, 2015
77

Closest-point-projection
The closest-point-projection (cpp) is obtained as the solution of
the following constrained minimization problem, written in
terms of the complementary energy as,
S
=
* arg min (S T *) T *
(S S*) =
1
2
S S* C 1 =
2
1
2
(S S*) C (S S*)
1
Using the Lagrange multipliers method, it can be transformed

into the following unconstrained minimization problem
(S, T *; *) T *
L (S, S*; *) :=
(S S*) + *f (S*)
S* arg min L
April 1, 2015
78

The solution of the unconstrained minimization problem,
defining the closest-point-projection, yields,
(S, T *; *) T *
S*L (S, S*; *) :=S* (S S*) + * S* f (S*)
:=
C 1 (S S*) + * S* f (S*) =
0
S* arg min L
S* =
S * C S* f (S*)
* 0,
April 1, 2015
f (S*) 0, * f (S*) =
0
79

S* =
S * C S* f (S*)
* =
*E * f ( *, q*, q *) =
*E sgn ( * q *)
q* =
q *K q* f ( *, q*, q *) =
q *K
q * =
q *H q* f ( *, q*, q *) =+
q *H sgn ( * q *)
* 0,
April 1, 2015
f ( *, q*, q*) 0, * f ( *, q*, q*) =

0
80

* q * = q * ( E + H ) sgn ( * q *)
* q * sgn ( * q *) = q sgn ( q )
* ( E + H ) sgn ( * q *)
( * q * + * ( E + H ) ) sgn ( * q *) = q sgn ( q )
* q * = q * ( E + H ) , sgn ( * q *) = sgn ( q )
April 1, 2015
81

For the non-trivial case, using the Kuhn-Tucker complementarity
conditions for the cpp, the Lagrange multiplier reads,
* 0,
if
f ( *, q*, q*) 0, * f ( *, q*, q*) =

0
* > 0 then
f ( *, q*, q*) = * q* Y + q* = 0
f ( *, q*, q*) = q * ( E + H ) Y + q*
= q * ( E + H ) Y + q *K
= q * ( E + K + H ) Y + q
= f ( , q, q ) * ( E + K=
+H) 0
* = ( E + K + H )
April 1, 2015
f ( , q, q ) > 0
82

S* =
S * C S* f (S*)
1
f ( , q, q ) sgn ( q )
f ( , q, q )
* = E ( E + K + H )
q* =q K ( E + K + H )
q* =q + H ( E + K + H )
April 1, 2015
f ( , q, q ) sgn ( q )
83

The associative plastic flow rule takes the form,
1 1
p
=
E
C (S S*)
=
p
( *=)
( E+K +H )
f ( , q, q ) sgn ( q )
1 1
1
1
= K ( q q*=
) ( E+K +H ) f ( , q, q )
1 1
1
1
= H ( q q *) = ( E+K +H ) f ( , q, q ) sgn ( q )
April 1, 2015
84

The associative plastic flow rule equations can be recast in the
form,
=
p sgn ( q )
=
=
sgn ( q )
( E+K +H )
f ( , q, q )=
f ( , q, q )
where the relaxation time takes the form,
:= ( E+K +H )
1
April 1, 2015
85

Chapter 1. 1D Plasticity Models v1.0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 1. 1D Plasticity Models v1.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Computational Solid Mechanics

Chapter 1. 1D Plasticity Models

1D Plasticity Models > Contents

2. 1D Rate dependent plasticity models

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Contents

2. 1D Rate dependent plasticity models

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

H4. Clausius-Planck inequality. Linear elastic constitutive

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

H7. Kuhn-Tucker loading/unloading conditions

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

Plastic loading: plastic consistency (or persistency) condition

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

Plastic loading: plastic multiplier (or plastic consistency)

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

f trial < 0 then =

f trial < 0 then

f trial > 0 then > 0 Plastic loading

f trial > 0 then

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Perfect plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Hardening plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Hardening plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Hardening plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models

Hardening plasticity model

Carlos Agelet de Saracibar

1D Plasticity Models > Rate Independent Plasticity Models